DJing Discussion
NAMM 2015...Serato has a booth this year!
This area is for discussion about DJing in general. Please remember the community rules when posting and try to be polite and inclusive.
NAMM 2015...Serato has a booth this year!
Rebelguy
1:51 AM - 12 November, 2014
So I was looking over the exhibitor list for this year and just noticed that Serato has a booth this year.
Let the predictions begin as to what may be coming out from this time around.
I am thinking we are going to see some Serato made hardware products this time around. Possibly their own audio interfaces since the Rane deal is over.
Also...who's going?
Let the predictions begin as to what may be coming out from this time around.
I am thinking we are going to see some Serato made hardware products this time around. Possibly their own audio interfaces since the Rane deal is over.
Also...who's going?
Joee
2:19 AM - 12 November, 2014
interesting ……surely they wouldn't have a booth just to showcase software?
they could cut the legs form under rane buy offering a serato branded sound card at half price of rane
they could cut the legs form under rane buy offering a serato branded sound card at half price of rane
lvmez
2:22 AM - 12 November, 2014
Who cares about half price, will it be the same quality as Rane? I doubt it.
Joee
2:49 AM - 12 November, 2014
we are talking sound card here IE sl2,3,4……how hard is it to make a quality sound card ,even so a lot of the new up and coming people that have no knowledge of rane/quality it won't matter
example (when djing with scratchLive) when does anyone say aw you using rane? they always said you using SERATO!
that serato name alone is enough to sell the product, or better yet what if they jump into bed with another hardware company?
Quote:
Who cares about half price, will it be the same quality as Rane? I doubt it.we are talking sound card here IE sl2,3,4……how hard is it to make a quality sound card ,even so a lot of the new up and coming people that have no knowledge of rane/quality it won't matter
example (when djing with scratchLive) when does anyone say aw you using rane? they always said you using SERATO!
that serato name alone is enough to sell the product, or better yet what if they jump into bed with another hardware company?
Joee
2:51 AM - 12 November, 2014
other example, we are on the serato forum not rane
with all the complaints about serato dj and the end of scratchLive the serato name still stands for something
with all the complaints about serato dj and the end of scratchLive the serato name still stands for something
MPC O.G.
2:58 AM - 12 November, 2014
That would be great then Rane could make gear for other DVS systems....
By the way did you see that VDJ 8 can be used with ANY soundcard. Only Serato and Traktor are still locked to certain hardware. Sooner or later everything will be a free for all. I'm thinking it's going to be sooner.
By the way did you see that VDJ 8 can be used with ANY soundcard. Only Serato and Traktor are still locked to certain hardware. Sooner or later everything will be a free for all. I'm thinking it's going to be sooner.
Rebelguy
3:21 AM - 12 November, 2014
A new Rane updated soundcard minus the Serato Tax would be interesting.
MPC O.G.
8:37 AM - 12 November, 2014
Actually that's a great idea. All they have to do is take Serato off the box, and change the graphics....
Quote:
A new Rane updated soundcard minus the Serato Tax would be interesting.Actually that's a great idea. All they have to do is take Serato off the box, and change the graphics....
DJ DisGrace
12:46 PM - 12 November, 2014
with all the complaints about serato dj and the end of scratchLive the Rane name still stands for something
fixed
Quote:
other example, we are on the serato forum not ranewith all the complaints about serato dj and the end of scratchLive the Rane name still stands for something
fixed
Dj-M.Bezzle
2:43 PM - 12 November, 2014
Yall trippin, why would Serato put out a soundcard at this point when their focus is on controllers, toys, and stickers. Mark my words, whatever they show will be aimed at the autosync, out the box, look how easy it is, dj market.
Joee
2:44 PM - 12 November, 2014
your saying there going to show a serato made controller?
Quote:
Yall trippin, why would Serato put out a soundcard at this point when their focus is on controllers, toys, and stickers. Mark my words, whatever they show will be aimed at the autosync, out the box, look how easy it is, dj market.your saying there going to show a serato made controller?
DJ GaFFle
2:48 PM - 12 November, 2014
LoL!
Quote:
Yall trippin, why would Serato put out a soundcard at this point when their focus is on controllers, toys, and stickers. Mark my words, whatever they show will be aimed at the autosync, out the box, look how easy it is, dj market.LoL!
Dj-M.Bezzle
3:45 PM - 12 November, 2014
your saying there going to show a serato made controller?
No, you def wont see any "serato made" hardware...mabye a serato branded one
Quote:
Quote:
Yall trippin, why would Serato put out a soundcard at this point when their focus is on controllers, toys, and stickers. Mark my words, whatever they show will be aimed at the autosync, out the box, look how easy it is, dj market.your saying there going to show a serato made controller?
No, you def wont see any "serato made" hardware...mabye a serato branded one
Joee
3:51 PM - 12 November, 2014
either way it will be interesting to see what they have, i really don't think they would have a booth just to showcase software
Quote:
No, you def wont see any "serato made" hardware...mabye a serato branded oneeither way it will be interesting to see what they have, i really don't think they would have a booth just to showcase software
Dj-M.Bezzle
3:55 PM - 12 November, 2014
either way it will be interesting to see what they have
I dout it. They're probably just hocking a new line if shirts and phone covers
Quote:
Quote:
No, you def wont see any "serato made" hardware...mabye a serato branded oneeither way it will be interesting to see what they have
I dout it. They're probably just hocking a new line if shirts and phone covers
s3kn0tr0n1c
4:20 PM - 12 November, 2014
By the way did you see that VDJ 8 can be used with ANY soundcard. Only Serato and Traktor are still locked to certain hardware. Sooner or later everything will be a free for all. I'm thinking it's going to be sooner.
That shud be the way to go.....buy hardware (- serato tax)
Then use whatever software you want buy buying it ;)
Any soundcard can be used.
Quote:
That would be great then Rane could make gear for other DVS systems....By the way did you see that VDJ 8 can be used with ANY soundcard. Only Serato and Traktor are still locked to certain hardware. Sooner or later everything will be a free for all. I'm thinking it's going to be sooner.
That shud be the way to go.....buy hardware (- serato tax)
Then use whatever software you want buy buying it ;)
Any soundcard can be used.
skinnyguy
5:15 PM - 12 November, 2014
Why would hardware without a serato tax be at the Serato booth? If it unlocks serato's software, it'll definitely have a tax and most likely appear at the booth.
And they've already jumped in bed with all the main hardware companies.
And they've already jumped in bed with all the main hardware companies.
Rebelguy
5:18 PM - 12 November, 2014
Rumors I heard last year were that Serato signed a distribution deal with a major hardware distributor. I'm sure it wasn't for control vinyl and t-shirts.
Joee
6:22 PM - 12 November, 2014
serato is why i choose serato over traktor it's the software not the mixer/soundcard
Quote:
Rane is why I chose Serato over Traktor.serato is why i choose serato over traktor it's the software not the mixer/soundcard
Systemaddict
6:43 PM - 12 November, 2014
serato is why i choose serato over traktor it's the software not the mixer/soundcard
When I mix I use a... wait for it... mixer.
Quote:
Quote:
Rane is why I chose Serato over Traktor.serato is why i choose serato over traktor it's the software not the mixer/soundcard
When I mix I use a... wait for it... mixer.
Joee
6:48 PM - 12 November, 2014
but you can mix with any mixer numark rane allen heath vestax…….& when you mix you mix with ….serato…..software right?
Quote:
When I mix I use a... wait for it... mixer.but you can mix with any mixer numark rane allen heath vestax…….& when you mix you mix with ….serato…..software right?
Dj-M.Bezzle
6:56 PM - 12 November, 2014
Yes but that wouldnt be "serato made" hardware would it?
Quote:
Rumors I heard last year were that Serato signed a distribution deal with a major hardware distributor. I'm sure it wasn't for control vinyl and t-shirts.Yes but that wouldnt be "serato made" hardware would it?
Systemaddict
6:59 PM - 12 November, 2014
but you can mix with any mixer numark rane allen heath vestax…….& when you mix you mix with ….serato…..software right?
Some of us are actual turntablists and the choice of mixer is the most important part of any configuration, I would say even more than the turntables and definitely more than the software.
If you're putting Numark and Rane in the same category than perhaps this is not a discussion you should be participating in.
Quote:
Quote:
When I mix I use a... wait for it... mixer.but you can mix with any mixer numark rane allen heath vestax…….& when you mix you mix with ….serato…..software right?
Some of us are actual turntablists and the choice of mixer is the most important part of any configuration, I would say even more than the turntables and definitely more than the software.
If you're putting Numark and Rane in the same category than perhaps this is not a discussion you should be participating in.
djcrap
7:00 PM - 12 November, 2014
There is going to be nothing new at the serato booth. its all going to be bragging rights about the end of scratchlive and the new chapter of serato dj plus things that are already out. like flip, serato remote, pitch n time. sticker sync, am mode and dvs pack then , pioneer sz and all the controllers out
no new hardware is going to be at namm y'all keep dreaming
no new hardware is going to be at namm y'all keep dreaming
Joee
7:10 PM - 12 November, 2014
yo mean like this here?
imageshack.com
i'll give you that, i was using a rane ttm 52 back when people were still using vestax 05 pro because i knew rane made a superior product
see above statement!
Quote:
Some of us are actual turntablists and the choice of mixer is the most important part of any configurationyo mean like this here?
imageshack.com
Quote:
I would say even more than the turntables and definitely more than the software.i'll give you that, i was using a rane ttm 52 back when people were still using vestax 05 pro because i knew rane made a superior product
Quote:
If you're putting Numark and Rane in the same category than perhaps this is not a discussion you should be participating in.see above statement!
blackavenger
7:57 PM - 12 November, 2014
I could see that happening.
Quote:
SeratoDJ / Bridge2 demos all day longI could see that happening.
pdidy
8:34 PM - 12 November, 2014
If you're putting Numark and Rane in the same category than perhaps this is not a discussion you should be participating in.
Oh snap, no he did not go there.....lol
Quote:
If you're putting Numark and Rane in the same category than perhaps this is not a discussion you should be participating in.
Oh snap, no he did not go there.....lol
Rebelguy
8:40 PM - 12 November, 2014
Yes but that wouldnt be "serato made" hardware would it?
I'm thinking something along the lines of what Native Instruments does now.
Quote:
Quote:
Rumors I heard last year were that Serato signed a distribution deal with a major hardware distributor. I'm sure it wasn't for control vinyl and t-shirts.Yes but that wouldnt be "serato made" hardware would it?
I'm thinking something along the lines of what Native Instruments does now.
Dj-M.Bezzle
8:51 PM - 12 November, 2014
Yes but that wouldnt be "serato made" hardware would it?
I'm thinking something along the lines of what Native Instruments does now.
The big difference us Native Instruments is a hardware company, a diverse hardware company at that, seratos just software (a not so diverse one at that) and I dont see them changing that.
no new hardware is going to be at namm y'all keep dreaming
nah, theyll have some new bullshit, like a new numark/serato controller that has hungry hungry hippos built in so you wont be as bored while their software mixs for you. Or mabye a pioneer/serato new launchpad that lets you do cam shows for quarters at your gigs.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Rumors I heard last year were that Serato signed a distribution deal with a major hardware distributor. I'm sure it wasn't for control vinyl and t-shirts.Yes but that wouldnt be "serato made" hardware would it?
I'm thinking something along the lines of what Native Instruments does now.
The big difference us Native Instruments is a hardware company, a diverse hardware company at that, seratos just software (a not so diverse one at that) and I dont see them changing that.
Quote:
There is going to be nothing new at the serato booth. its all going to be bragging rights about the end of scratchlive and the new chapter of serato dj plus things that are already out. like flip, serato remote, pitch n time. sticker sync, am mode and dvs pack then , pioneer sz and all the controllers outno new hardware is going to be at namm y'all keep dreaming
nah, theyll have some new bullshit, like a new numark/serato controller that has hungry hungry hippos built in so you wont be as bored while their software mixs for you. Or mabye a pioneer/serato new launchpad that lets you do cam shows for quarters at your gigs.
Joee
9:05 PM - 12 November, 2014
man he don't make me no never mind ,I've probably owned rane products since he was in dippers
point i was making was the hole reason we are on these rane mixer is serato, if numark or another company would have had the deal that rane did with serato than all of us dj's would have been on those mixers instead if rane….why because sreato scratchLive was a major game changer for the dj community …..it even brought some dj's like yourself out of retirement ……it would not have mattered what mixer it was on
stanton final scratch opened the dj serato perfected it with SSL….so you se homeboy is trying to act smart right? while i speak facts!!!!!!
Quote:
Oh snap, no he did not go there.....lolman he don't make me no never mind ,I've probably owned rane products since he was in dippers
point i was making was the hole reason we are on these rane mixer is serato, if numark or another company would have had the deal that rane did with serato than all of us dj's would have been on those mixers instead if rane….why because sreato scratchLive was a major game changer for the dj community …..it even brought some dj's like yourself out of retirement ……it would not have mattered what mixer it was on
stanton final scratch opened the dj serato perfected it with SSL….so you se homeboy is trying to act smart right? while i speak facts!!!!!!
Dj-M.Bezzle
9:07 PM - 12 November, 2014
man he don't make me no never mind ,I've probably owned rane products since he was in dippers
point i was making was the hole reason we are on these rane mixer is serato, if numark or another company would have had the deal that rane did with serato than all of us dj's would have been on those mixers instead if rane….why because sreato scratchLive was a major game changer for the dj community …..it even brought some dj's like yourself out of retirement ……it would not have mattered what mixer it was on
stanton final scratch opened the dj serato perfected it with SSL….so you se homeboy is trying to act smart right? while i speak grammer horribly!!!!!!
fixed
Quote:
Quote:
Oh snap, no he did not go there.....lolman he don't make me no never mind ,I've probably owned rane products since he was in dippers
point i was making was the hole reason we are on these rane mixer is serato, if numark or another company would have had the deal that rane did with serato than all of us dj's would have been on those mixers instead if rane….why because sreato scratchLive was a major game changer for the dj community …..it even brought some dj's like yourself out of retirement ……it would not have mattered what mixer it was on
stanton final scratch opened the dj serato perfected it with SSL….so you se homeboy is trying to act smart right? while i speak grammer horribly!!!!!!
fixed
Joee
9:09 PM - 12 November, 2014
^ you still here misquoting people? you must not have found the new miss beezzle yet
Dj-M.Bezzle
9:21 PM - 12 November, 2014
Oh I found one, she wanted me to tell you shes gonna be late picking you up from school cause your brother needs a ride to soccer.
Quote:
^ you still here misquoting people? you must not have found the new miss beezzle yetOh I found one, she wanted me to tell you shes gonna be late picking you up from school cause your brother needs a ride to soccer.
Joee
9:30 PM - 12 November, 2014
^ is that a take on a your mama joke…….lame
what are you 10 years old…….o wait never mind were talking about bezzle here, you see that behavior is the reason the old miss bezzle probably left you & also the reason the only action you probably see right hand while
make sure to use plenty of lotion ;)
what are you 10 years old…….o wait never mind were talking about bezzle here, you see that behavior is the reason the old miss bezzle probably left you & also the reason the only action you probably see right hand while
make sure to use plenty of lotion ;)
Dj-M.Bezzle
9:52 PM - 12 November, 2014
fixed!
FALSE, my left hand is a BEAST!
Quote:
you probably see is you right handfixed!
FALSE, my left hand is a BEAST!
Joee
9:55 PM - 12 November, 2014
man stop it, you know you like to cheat on you left hand with your right hand
but yea you just confirmed it! ;)
Quote:
FALSE, my left hand is a BEAST!man stop it, you know you like to cheat on you left hand with your right hand
but yea you just confirmed it! ;)
O.B.1
10:14 PM - 12 November, 2014
man stop it, you know you like to cheat on you left hand with your right hand
but yea you just confirmed it! ;)
I hope you're all talking about skratching...
Quote:
Quote:
FALSE, my left hand is a BEAST!man stop it, you know you like to cheat on you left hand with your right hand
but yea you just confirmed it! ;)
I hope you're all talking about skratching...
O.B.1
10:15 PM - 12 November, 2014
I'm actually VERY excited to see what the RANE booth will be unveiling at NAMM this Jan!
Rebelguy
10:15 PM - 12 November, 2014
The big difference us Native Instruments is a hardware company, a diverse hardware company at that, seratos just software (a not so diverse one at that) and I dont see them changing that.
Native Instruments started as a software company. Their company started in 1996 with software synthesizers. Their first hardware product wasn't until 2004 and it was Guitar Rig.
Quote:
The big difference us Native Instruments is a hardware company, a diverse hardware company at that, seratos just software (a not so diverse one at that) and I dont see them changing that.
Native Instruments started as a software company. Their company started in 1996 with software synthesizers. Their first hardware product wasn't until 2004 and it was Guitar Rig.
Gio Alex
10:18 PM - 12 November, 2014
your saying there going to show a serato made controller?
No, you def wont see any "serato made" hardware...mabye a serato branded one
I think M.Bezzle is right. Their maine focus has been pumping out serato on as many controllers as possible. I see no reason to have a new mixer anyway. People are cheap about DJ gear nowadays anyway. Companies make way more money pumping out cheap shit then stuff like a 68 mixer that most new jacks won't even look at anyway.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Yall trippin, why would Serato put out a soundcard at this point when their focus is on controllers, toys, and stickers. Mark my words, whatever they show will be aimed at the autosync, out the box, look how easy it is, dj market.your saying there going to show a serato made controller?
No, you def wont see any "serato made" hardware...mabye a serato branded one
I think M.Bezzle is right. Their maine focus has been pumping out serato on as many controllers as possible. I see no reason to have a new mixer anyway. People are cheap about DJ gear nowadays anyway. Companies make way more money pumping out cheap shit then stuff like a 68 mixer that most new jacks won't even look at anyway.
Joee
10:19 PM - 12 November, 2014
lol…...
same here
Quote:
I hope you're all talking about skratching...lol…...
Quote:
I'm actually VERY excited to see what the RANE booth will be unveiling at NAMM this Jan!same here
Rebelguy
10:20 PM - 12 November, 2014
Probably nothing.
Quote:
I'm actually VERY excited to see what the RANE booth will be unveiling at NAMM this Jan!Probably nothing.
pdidy
10:20 PM - 12 November, 2014
Well thats a fact.....
Quote:
.why because sreato scratchLive was a major game changer for the dj community …..it even brought some dj's like yourself out of retirementWell thats a fact.....
Rebelguy
10:25 PM - 12 November, 2014
point i was making was the hole reason we are on these rane mixer is serato, if numark or another company would have had the deal that rane did with serato than all of us dj's would have been on those mixers instead if rane….why because sreato scratchLive was a major game changer for the dj community …..it even brought some dj's like yourself out of retirement ……it would not have mattered what mixer it was on
stanton final scratch opened the dj serato perfected it with SSL….so you se homeboy is trying to act smart right? while i speak facts!!!!!!
From what I've heard Serato was turned down by every major company and ended up at Rane. From my understanding Serato was what saved Rane. I believe they were up for sale before this deal happened. I'm actually curious to see what happens to them in the next couple of years.
Quote:
point i was making was the hole reason we are on these rane mixer is serato, if numark or another company would have had the deal that rane did with serato than all of us dj's would have been on those mixers instead if rane….why because sreato scratchLive was a major game changer for the dj community …..it even brought some dj's like yourself out of retirement ……it would not have mattered what mixer it was on
stanton final scratch opened the dj serato perfected it with SSL….so you se homeboy is trying to act smart right? while i speak facts!!!!!!
From what I've heard Serato was turned down by every major company and ended up at Rane. From my understanding Serato was what saved Rane. I believe they were up for sale before this deal happened. I'm actually curious to see what happens to them in the next couple of years.
pdidy
10:32 PM - 12 November, 2014
Fact
As shitty as behringer is im pretty sure they out sell serato and rane combined.....
Quote:
Companies make way more money pumping out cheap shit then stuff like a 68 mixer that most new jacks won't even look at anyway.Fact
As shitty as behringer is im pretty sure they out sell serato and rane combined.....
Rebelguy
10:38 PM - 12 November, 2014
Fact
As shitty as behringer is im pretty sure they out sell serato and rane combined.....
Well they made enough money to buy Klark Teknik, Turbosound & Midas so I think they are doing okay.
Quote:
Quote:
Companies make way more money pumping out cheap shit then stuff like a 68 mixer that most new jacks won't even look at anyway.Fact
As shitty as behringer is im pretty sure they out sell serato and rane combined.....
Well they made enough money to buy Klark Teknik, Turbosound & Midas so I think they are doing okay.
Dj-M.Bezzle
10:48 PM - 12 November, 2014
Native Instruments started as a software company. Their company started in 1996 with software synthesizers. Their first hardware product wasn't until 2004 and it was Guitar Rig.
understood, they made in house synth and over a 18 year period grew that to a very diverse portfolio if hardware and software VS Serato, who over a 10 year period, has managed to male a software that slows down and speed up tracks and released it.....twice. The second time being the exact same as the first with a bunch of bugs added and features removed.
Quote:
Quote:
The big difference us Native Instruments is a hardware company, a diverse hardware company at that, seratos just software (a not so diverse one at that) and I dont see them changing that.Native Instruments started as a software company. Their company started in 1996 with software synthesizers. Their first hardware product wasn't until 2004 and it was Guitar Rig.
understood, they made in house synth and over a 18 year period grew that to a very diverse portfolio if hardware and software VS Serato, who over a 10 year period, has managed to male a software that slows down and speed up tracks and released it.....twice. The second time being the exact same as the first with a bunch of bugs added and features removed.
Dj-M.Bezzle
10:50 PM - 12 November, 2014
your saying there going to show a serato made controller?
No, you def wont see any "serato made" hardware...mabye a serato branded one
I think M.Bezzle is right. Their maine focus has been pumping out serato on as many controllers as possible. I see no reason to have a new mixer anyway. People are cheap about DJ gear nowadays anyway. Companies make way more money pumping out cheap shit then stuff like a 68 mixer that most new jacks won't even look at anyway.
THIS, dude the days of top knotch groundbreaking gear are over. Prepare yourself for the release of Seratos new line of controller and software skins.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Yall trippin, why would Serato put out a soundcard at this point when their focus is on controllers, toys, and stickers. Mark my words, whatever they show will be aimed at the autosync, out the box, look how easy it is, dj market.your saying there going to show a serato made controller?
No, you def wont see any "serato made" hardware...mabye a serato branded one
I think M.Bezzle is right. Their maine focus has been pumping out serato on as many controllers as possible. I see no reason to have a new mixer anyway. People are cheap about DJ gear nowadays anyway. Companies make way more money pumping out cheap shit then stuff like a 68 mixer that most new jacks won't even look at anyway.
THIS, dude the days of top knotch groundbreaking gear are over. Prepare yourself for the release of Seratos new line of controller and software skins.
pdidy
10:52 PM - 12 November, 2014
Fact
As shitty as behringer is im pretty sure they out sell serato and rane combined.....
Well they made enough money to buy Klark Teknik, Turbosound & Midas so I think they are doing okay.
oh so you already know ;)
I was completely flabbergasted when they brought Turbosound img1.wikia.nocookie.net
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Companies make way more money pumping out cheap shit then stuff like a 68 mixer that most new jacks won't even look at anyway.Fact
As shitty as behringer is im pretty sure they out sell serato and rane combined.....
Well they made enough money to buy Klark Teknik, Turbosound & Midas so I think they are doing okay.
oh so you already know ;)
I was completely flabbergasted when they brought Turbosound img1.wikia.nocookie.net
Dj-M.Bezzle
10:53 PM - 12 November, 2014
The booth is probably just there for Dubcowboy to have a place to put all his collectors swag
Rebelguy
10:58 PM - 12 November, 2014
understood, they made in house synth and over a 18 year period grew that to a very diverse portfolio if hardware and software VS Serato, who over a 10 year period, has managed to male a software that slows down and speed up tracks and released it.....twice. The second time being the exact same as the first with a bunch of bugs added and features removed.
Plus one of the top time stretching and pitch shifting plug-ins for Pro Tools. Also you forgot the cool t-shirts and control vinyl.
Quote:
understood, they made in house synth and over a 18 year period grew that to a very diverse portfolio if hardware and software VS Serato, who over a 10 year period, has managed to male a software that slows down and speed up tracks and released it.....twice. The second time being the exact same as the first with a bunch of bugs added and features removed.
Plus one of the top time stretching and pitch shifting plug-ins for Pro Tools. Also you forgot the cool t-shirts and control vinyl.
Rebelguy
10:58 PM - 12 November, 2014
The need more than one booth.
Quote:
The booth is probably just there for Dubcowboy to have a place to put all his collectors swagThe need more than one booth.
Joee
11:00 PM - 12 November, 2014
that was funny…lol
but this was hilarious ………lmao
Quote:
The booth is probably just there for Dubcowboy to have a place to put all his collectors swagthat was funny…lol
Quote:
The need more than one booth.but this was hilarious ………lmao
DJ Reflex
11:20 PM - 12 November, 2014
Gotta agree with this - from my end at least. Heck, if Behringer had vynal emulation back in the day I would have bought into it. I never heard of Rane before Serato. Now I don't go around talking about how Rane mixers are the best ever... I have had little comparison. (original Radio Shack mixer, some old Peavey, Behringer DJX700... and now Rane TTM57). Originally, Serato was just a small black box (SL1) you plugged your turntables into and viola - digital DJ. Only thing the Rane mixer did for me personally was INTEGRATE Serato.
I would like to see some revolutionary stuff at NAMM, but like most here have said, the days of innovative new technologies are dwindling. Only a handful of features on existing controllers/programs left to add. Maybe Beamz integration???
Quote:
point i was making was the hole reason we are on these rane mixer is serato, if numark or another company would have had the deal that rane did with serato than all of us dj's would have been on those mixers instead if rane….why because sreato scratchLive was a major game changer for the dj community …..it even brought some dj's like yourself out of retirement ……it would not have mattered what mixer it was onGotta agree with this - from my end at least. Heck, if Behringer had vynal emulation back in the day I would have bought into it. I never heard of Rane before Serato. Now I don't go around talking about how Rane mixers are the best ever... I have had little comparison. (original Radio Shack mixer, some old Peavey, Behringer DJX700... and now Rane TTM57). Originally, Serato was just a small black box (SL1) you plugged your turntables into and viola - digital DJ. Only thing the Rane mixer did for me personally was INTEGRATE Serato.
I would like to see some revolutionary stuff at NAMM, but like most here have said, the days of innovative new technologies are dwindling. Only a handful of features on existing controllers/programs left to add. Maybe Beamz integration???
Gio Alex
11:25 PM - 12 November, 2014
your saying there going to show a serato made controller?
No, you def wont see any "serato made" hardware...mabye a serato branded one
I think M.Bezzle is right. Their maine focus has been pumping out serato on as many controllers as possible. I see no reason to have a new mixer anyway. People are cheap about DJ gear nowadays anyway. Companies make way more money pumping out cheap shit then stuff like a 68 mixer that most new jacks won't even look at anyway.
THIS, dude the days of top knotch groundbreaking gear are over. Prepare yourself for the release of Seratos new line of controller and software skins.
Yup! Those days are definitely over. When I started I had to get two techs, a mixer, some PAs for those cheap outdoor or school parties I made no money one, some studio monitors for the home gig, and weekly spending on records. which set me back a couple grand to start plus 100-400 bucks a month on records.
The new generation can step in with a 200-300 controller and get the job done. Most of them are probably never going to do a mobile gig anyway. If they're too cheap to spend money on CDJs or TTS, then they're definitely too cheap to spend dough on PAs.
To reiterate, a few years back I worked at a spot that eventually had to liquidate all SL boxes and Rane mixes because since the rise of controllers your average person didn't want to invest that much in gear. That, and then I've had the same TTs for over a decade. My 909 and 57SL for mad years. Only thing that's really changed is changing needles and upgrading to a current SL box like an SL3. Gear like that was meant to last. So companies lose on on quality gear. It's cheaper to make less expensive gear and sell em by the truck load.
It's a new day. With all that said, it would be nice to see some eyebrow raising equipment, but I feel like all companies are all just putting the same shit anyway with the same quality, it almost doesn't even matter about brands anymore.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Yall trippin, why would Serato put out a soundcard at this point when their focus is on controllers, toys, and stickers. Mark my words, whatever they show will be aimed at the autosync, out the box, look how easy it is, dj market.your saying there going to show a serato made controller?
No, you def wont see any "serato made" hardware...mabye a serato branded one
I think M.Bezzle is right. Their maine focus has been pumping out serato on as many controllers as possible. I see no reason to have a new mixer anyway. People are cheap about DJ gear nowadays anyway. Companies make way more money pumping out cheap shit then stuff like a 68 mixer that most new jacks won't even look at anyway.
THIS, dude the days of top knotch groundbreaking gear are over. Prepare yourself for the release of Seratos new line of controller and software skins.
Yup! Those days are definitely over. When I started I had to get two techs, a mixer, some PAs for those cheap outdoor or school parties I made no money one, some studio monitors for the home gig, and weekly spending on records. which set me back a couple grand to start plus 100-400 bucks a month on records.
The new generation can step in with a 200-300 controller and get the job done. Most of them are probably never going to do a mobile gig anyway. If they're too cheap to spend money on CDJs or TTS, then they're definitely too cheap to spend dough on PAs.
To reiterate, a few years back I worked at a spot that eventually had to liquidate all SL boxes and Rane mixes because since the rise of controllers your average person didn't want to invest that much in gear. That, and then I've had the same TTs for over a decade. My 909 and 57SL for mad years. Only thing that's really changed is changing needles and upgrading to a current SL box like an SL3. Gear like that was meant to last. So companies lose on on quality gear. It's cheaper to make less expensive gear and sell em by the truck load.
It's a new day. With all that said, it would be nice to see some eyebrow raising equipment, but I feel like all companies are all just putting the same shit anyway with the same quality, it almost doesn't even matter about brands anymore.
Joee
11:27 PM - 12 November, 2014
I would like to see some revolutionary stuff at NAMM, but like most here have said, the days of innovative new technologies are dwindling. Only a handful of features on existing controllers/programs left to add.
i'm wit you here 100%
but this baawhwhwhwhwwhwhwwhwhwwhhwhw, maybe they ail have grandmaster jay in the serato booth
BAWHAHAHHAHAAHHHAAHAHHAAHAH!!!!!!
Quote:
Gotta agree with this - from my end at least. Heck, if Behringer had vynal emulation back in the day I would have bought into it. I never heard of Rane before Serato. Now I don't go around talking about how Rane mixers are the best ever... I have had little comparison. (original Radio Shack mixer, some old Peavey, Behringer DJX700... and now Rane TTM57). Originally, Serato was just a small black box (SL1) you plugged your turntables into and viola - digital DJ. Only thing the Rane mixer did for me personally was INTEGRATE Serato.I would like to see some revolutionary stuff at NAMM, but like most here have said, the days of innovative new technologies are dwindling. Only a handful of features on existing controllers/programs left to add.
i'm wit you here 100%
Quote:
Maybe Beamz integration???but this baawhwhwhwhwwhwhwwhwhwwhhwhw, maybe they ail have grandmaster jay in the serato booth
BAWHAHAHHAHAAHHHAAHAHHAAHAH!!!!!!
Niro
5:43 AM - 13 November, 2014
I would say Rane is a huge part of Serato being where it's at right now. Rane's reputation along with its support staff helped get people trusting and using Scratchlive. There were a few DVS options, torg, final scratch, vdj, numark's thingy....etc. but Serato was associated with Rane, which was known for their quality gear. Overall it was beneficial to both parties involved.
pdidy
6:34 AM - 13 November, 2014
The irony is most djs think a Serato box is made by Serato and the mixers are Serato mixers.
Most are clueless as to how important rane is.
I think the informed users are actually the minority while the majority just blindly follows OUR lead.
Most are clueless as to how important rane is.
I think the informed users are actually the minority while the majority just blindly follows OUR lead.
Niro
7:36 AM - 13 November, 2014
Paris Hilton just won Female DJ of the year award by NRJ, not sure what an NRJ is thou.
DJ Remix Detroit
11:37 AM - 13 November, 2014
very good point.... i think it's like that now in just about every other aspect in life as well.
Quote:
I think the informed users are actually the minority while the majority just blindly follows OUR lead.very good point.... i think it's like that now in just about every other aspect in life as well.
Taipanic
6:12 PM - 13 November, 2014
For the existing DJs at the time when Serato came out, being associated with Rane was a big sign of quality & being a top notch, professional product. The Rane MP24 was the only modern, high quality mixer to use for most of a decade before Serato came out. If you saw a Rane mixer in the booth, you know that club did things right.
Going forward I am sure Rane will not be selling as many DJ mixers so it will be interesting to see what directions they go in. They also sell a lot of contractor equipment, effects & processors so the DJ mixer business may not be the make or break product most DJs think it is for them.
Going forward I am sure Rane will not be selling as many DJ mixers so it will be interesting to see what directions they go in. They also sell a lot of contractor equipment, effects & processors so the DJ mixer business may not be the make or break product most DJs think it is for them.
skinnyguy
6:21 PM - 13 November, 2014
surprise. serato will go back to supporting scratchlive and serato dj separately. =P
Dj-M.Bezzle
6:38 PM - 13 November, 2014
im not gonna lie, I had never even heard of RANE until I got serato, it was all pioneer where Im from. As a matter of fact I passed on getting a 57 early on because I had never heard of rane and thought it looked like a toy in the product adds lol
Quote:
I would say Rane is a huge part of Serato being where it's at right now. Rane's reputation along with its support staff helped get people trusting and using Scratchlive. There were a few DVS options, torg, final scratch, vdj, numark's thingy....etc. but Serato was associated with Rane, which was known for their quality gear. Overall it was beneficial to both parties involved.im not gonna lie, I had never even heard of RANE until I got serato, it was all pioneer where Im from. As a matter of fact I passed on getting a 57 early on because I had never heard of rane and thought it looked like a toy in the product adds lol
Niro
7:14 PM - 13 November, 2014
Rane was and still is a small company, making all of it's equipment in a factory in Mukilteo. They were know for quality product amongst high end users. Their mixers were out of reach for many, most people DJing back then would crap bricks spending $800 on a 2 channel mixer.
Even thou you didn't know about Rane, back then, it's reputation weighted a ton. It's push and distribution along with the support staff helped people who knew adopt Scratchlive. In turn helping others to adopt Scratchlive. Rane mixers have always been about business, Vestax made some of the sexiest mixers out (07isp, whoo) but construction and sound quality were always top notch and that is still there motto. They are tried and true and stay away from the gimmicks.
Even thou you didn't know about Rane, back then, it's reputation weighted a ton. It's push and distribution along with the support staff helped people who knew adopt Scratchlive. In turn helping others to adopt Scratchlive. Rane mixers have always been about business, Vestax made some of the sexiest mixers out (07isp, whoo) but construction and sound quality were always top notch and that is still there motto. They are tried and true and stay away from the gimmicks.
Rebelguy
9:23 PM - 13 November, 2014
It's posted on the NAMM app. They are listed as booth 6464. Actually the map is working now and it shows them sharing the booth with a bunch of other people (Allen & Heath, Novation, Focusrite, Reloop, etc.) so it may or may not be that big of a deal. Either way this is the first year they have officially had a booth at the convention.
An Allen & Heath Serato mixer would be interesting although I can't see Pioneer letting this happen.
Quote:
Wait..where have you seen NAMM 2015 exhibitors list ???It's posted on the NAMM app. They are listed as booth 6464. Actually the map is working now and it shows them sharing the booth with a bunch of other people (Allen & Heath, Novation, Focusrite, Reloop, etc.) so it may or may not be that big of a deal. Either way this is the first year they have officially had a booth at the convention.
An Allen & Heath Serato mixer would be interesting although I can't see Pioneer letting this happen.
Gio Alex
9:28 PM - 13 November, 2014
I can't see Pioneer really caring. Their controllers run serato Dj anyway. Pretty much every major company has a serato controller.
Quote:
I can't see Pioneer letting this happen.I can't see Pioneer really caring. Their controllers run serato Dj anyway. Pretty much every major company has a serato controller.
Dj-M.Bezzle
9:37 PM - 13 November, 2014
Ya, the whole point of leaving Rane in the cold was so serato can be a strong independent black woman who dont need no man!
Gio Alex
9:39 PM - 13 November, 2014
LOL
Watchwww.youtube.com
Quote:
Ya, the whole point of leaving Rane in the cold was so serato can be a strong independent black woman who dont need no man!LOL
Watchwww.youtube.com
Sally Jessy Raphael
9:39 PM - 13 November, 2014
Totally original
Quote:
Ya, the whole point of leaving Rane in the cold was so serato can be a strong independent black woman who dont need no man!Totally original
Dj-M.Bezzle
9:44 PM - 13 November, 2014
Totally original
Hey, theres a shocker, you copying someone elses material!
Quote:
Quote:
Ya, the whole point of leaving Rane in the cold was so serato can be a strong independent black woman who dont need no man!Totally original
Hey, theres a shocker, you copying someone elses material!
Rebelguy
10:04 PM - 13 November, 2014
I can't see Pioneer really caring. Their controllers run serato Dj anyway. Pretty much every major company has a serato controller.
I am talking Mixers...not controllers. It was assumed that Pioneer is who stopped the Xone DB4 from getting Traktor certification when it was released. Mainly because of the DJM-900.
Quote:
Quote:
I can't see Pioneer letting this happen.I can't see Pioneer really caring. Their controllers run serato Dj anyway. Pretty much every major company has a serato controller.
I am talking Mixers...not controllers. It was assumed that Pioneer is who stopped the Xone DB4 from getting Traktor certification when it was released. Mainly because of the DJM-900.
Gio Alex
10:17 PM - 13 November, 2014
I can't see Pioneer really caring. Their controllers run serato Dj anyway. Pretty much every major company has a serato controller.
I am talking Mixers...not controllers. It was assumed that Pioneer is who stopped the Xone DB4 from getting Traktor certification when it was released. Mainly because of the DJM-900.
Trust me, I know you're talking mixers, but how many people do you know who personally own the 900SRT? I don't know any. I have plenty of friends who copped a 62 though. If you think about it, even the SZ or the SX can be considered a mixer anyway, but those price points made sense.
I just don't see Pio worrying that much about any Serato mixer. They seem to be really trying to push this rekordbox thing further though. I mean if Allen & Heath does one it's just gonna be another overpriced DVS mixer. Real competition would be if DJ-Tech, Numark or a company like that drops one. Then you'd see results like when NI dropped the Z2 where everyone bought one, even Serato users.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I can't see Pioneer letting this happen.I can't see Pioneer really caring. Their controllers run serato Dj anyway. Pretty much every major company has a serato controller.
I am talking Mixers...not controllers. It was assumed that Pioneer is who stopped the Xone DB4 from getting Traktor certification when it was released. Mainly because of the DJM-900.
Trust me, I know you're talking mixers, but how many people do you know who personally own the 900SRT? I don't know any. I have plenty of friends who copped a 62 though. If you think about it, even the SZ or the SX can be considered a mixer anyway, but those price points made sense.
I just don't see Pio worrying that much about any Serato mixer. They seem to be really trying to push this rekordbox thing further though. I mean if Allen & Heath does one it's just gonna be another overpriced DVS mixer. Real competition would be if DJ-Tech, Numark or a company like that drops one. Then you'd see results like when NI dropped the Z2 where everyone bought one, even Serato users.
djcrap
10:31 PM - 13 November, 2014
Watchm.youtube.com
I see your point
Lmao
Quote:
Ya, the whole point of leaving Rane in the cold was so serato can be a strong independent black woman who dont need no man!Watchm.youtube.com
I see your point
Lmao
Rebelguy
10:45 PM - 13 November, 2014
Trust me, I know you're talking mixers, but how many people do you know who personally own the 900SRT? I don't know any. I have plenty of friends who copped a 62 though. If you think about it, even the SZ or the SX can be considered a mixer anyway, but those price points made sense.
I know about 12 people personally with the 900SRT. I know about 2-3 people with a 62 and one of those wants to sell if for a 900. Not the SRT model though.
Quote:
Trust me, I know you're talking mixers, but how many people do you know who personally own the 900SRT? I don't know any. I have plenty of friends who copped a 62 though. If you think about it, even the SZ or the SX can be considered a mixer anyway, but those price points made sense.
I know about 12 people personally with the 900SRT. I know about 2-3 people with a 62 and one of those wants to sell if for a 900. Not the SRT model though.
Gio Alex
10:56 PM - 13 November, 2014
I know about 12 people personally with the 900SRT. I know about 2-3 people with a 62 and one of those wants to sell if for a 900. Not the SRT model though.
Fair enough. I guess different preferences.
I still feel that they've mostly just been repurposing the same products and parts. 800-900-900nexus, 900SRT. But I regress, I still feel the real competition would be in brands that are less expensive as mentioned before. Z2 did pretty well sales wise. Imagine a Serato Mixer under a grand.
Quote:
Quote:
Trust me, I know you're talking mixers, but how many people do you know who personally own the 900SRT? I don't know any. I have plenty of friends who copped a 62 though. If you think about it, even the SZ or the SX can be considered a mixer anyway, but those price points made sense.Fair enough. I guess different preferences.
I still feel that they've mostly just been repurposing the same products and parts. 800-900-900nexus, 900SRT. But I regress, I still feel the real competition would be in brands that are less expensive as mentioned before. Z2 did pretty well sales wise. Imagine a Serato Mixer under a grand.
Gio Alex
11:30 PM - 13 November, 2014
It's a step in the right direction, but I mean a real mixer though. That joint looks like fisher price toy.
It's a step in the right direction, but I mean a real mixer though. That joint looks like fisher price toy.
pdidy
11:37 PM - 13 November, 2014
not a bad toy a nearly 1/5 the price of a 62. Now if were plug & play no license required i would already own one as the perfect mixer backup.
Dj Shamann
11:38 PM - 13 November, 2014
Speak for yourself, the whole reason I'm on Serato is because of Rane
Quote:
point i was making was the hole reason we are on these rane mixer is serato, if numark or another company would have had the deal that rane did with serato than all of us dj's would have been on those mixers instead if raneSpeak for yourself, the whole reason I'm on Serato is because of Rane
Rebelguy
11:56 PM - 13 November, 2014
Doesn't Serato have a booth every year?
Nope. First time.
Quote:
Anyway, on topic:Doesn't Serato have a booth every year?
Nope. First time.
Joee
12:02 AM - 14 November, 2014
so if serato scratchLive was not associated with rane mixers/soundcards you would not be using sracthLive?
Quote:
Speak for yourself, the whole reason I'm on Serato is because of Raneso if serato scratchLive was not associated with rane mixers/soundcards you would not be using sracthLive?
MPC O.G.
2:01 AM - 14 November, 2014
Since Serato has gone away exclusivity with RANE, THEIR product has suffered. SDJ vs SSL proves it. Just MY opinion.
Joee
2:03 AM - 14 November, 2014
i'm one of those people that has never EVER had one single issue with SDJ
Quote:
Since Serato has gone away exclusivity with RANE, THEIR product has suffered. SDJ vs SSL proves it. Just MY opinion.i'm one of those people that has never EVER had one single issue with SDJ
DJ Remix Detroit
2:07 AM - 14 November, 2014
i'm one of those people that has never EVER had one single issue with SDJ
You need to play the lotto soon.
Quote:
Quote:
Since Serato has gone away exclusivity with RANE, THEIR product has suffered. SDJ vs SSL proves it. Just MY opinion.i'm one of those people that has never EVER had one single issue with SDJ
You need to play the lotto soon.
Joee
2:09 AM - 14 November, 2014
lol……..never one single issue since i started using SDJ with 1.3
Quote:
You need to play the lotto soon.lol……..never one single issue since i started using SDJ with 1.3
Dj Shamann
2:27 AM - 14 November, 2014
so if serato scratchLive was not associated with rane mixers/soundcards you would not be using sracthLive?
Did I say that? No, you wanted to speak for all of us and say we'd be on Numarks or something else if that's who made the deal, and I said no.
I was on Rane for years by the time there were rumors of Serato moving into the full on DVS game.
Secondly, when Scratch Live dropped, it was on a box/soundcard, not a mixer, so we were all on our regular mixers regardless of who they partnered with.
Quote:
so if serato scratchLive was not associated with rane mixers/soundcards you would not be using sracthLive?
Did I say that? No, you wanted to speak for all of us and say we'd be on Numarks or something else if that's who made the deal, and I said no.
I was on Rane for years by the time there were rumors of Serato moving into the full on DVS game.
Secondly, when Scratch Live dropped, it was on a box/soundcard, not a mixer, so we were all on our regular mixers regardless of who they partnered with.
Dj Shamann
2:30 AM - 14 November, 2014
Doesn't Serato have a booth every year?
Nope. First time.
Hmmm, I guess they've always partnered in the Rane booth then, because they usually have their presence there at least.
Quote:
Quote:
Anyway, on topic:Doesn't Serato have a booth every year?
Nope. First time.
Hmmm, I guess they've always partnered in the Rane booth then, because they usually have their presence there at least.
monchi
2:40 AM - 14 November, 2014
lol……..never one single issue since i started using SDJ with 1.3
Laptop specs, OS version and hardware, thanks
Quote:
Quote:
You need to play the lotto soon.lol……..never one single issue since i started using SDJ with 1.3
Laptop specs, OS version and hardware, thanks
Joee
3:30 AM - 14 November, 2014
you right ,but humor me what if there were no sound card when serato was released & you needed to use a compatible mixer & that mixer was a numark this would be the only way to use scratchLive
would you have not given scratchLive a try because it was a numark mixer & if you been djing since the 80's or 90's than you remember numark used to make really good mixers
i purchased the original TTM52 when it first dropped
2.2 i7 8gigs ram 60 gig solid state osx lion SDJ 1.7 ddj sx/ddj sr
Quote:
Secondly, when Scratch Live dropped, it was on a box/soundcard, not a mixer, so we were all on our regular mixers regardless of who they partnered with.you right ,but humor me what if there were no sound card when serato was released & you needed to use a compatible mixer & that mixer was a numark this would be the only way to use scratchLive
would you have not given scratchLive a try because it was a numark mixer & if you been djing since the 80's or 90's than you remember numark used to make really good mixers
Quote:
I was on Rane for years by the time there were rumors of Serato moving into the full on DVS game.i purchased the original TTM52 when it first dropped
Quote:
Laptop specs, OS version and hardware, thanks2.2 i7 8gigs ram 60 gig solid state osx lion SDJ 1.7 ddj sx/ddj sr
Rebelguy
3:40 AM - 14 November, 2014
Hmmm, I guess they've always partnered in the Rane booth then, because they usually have their presence there at least.
Not officially but yes they were there.
Quote:
Hmmm, I guess they've always partnered in the Rane booth then, because they usually have their presence there at least.
Not officially but yes they were there.
deejdave
3:58 AM - 14 November, 2014
i'm one of those people that has never EVER had one single issue with SDJ
You need to play the lotto soon.
It has been my experience that this by NO means a coincidence and is quite easy to achieve if the will is there.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Since Serato has gone away exclusivity with RANE, THEIR product has suffered. SDJ vs SSL proves it. Just MY opinion.i'm one of those people that has never EVER had one single issue with SDJ
You need to play the lotto soon.
It has been my experience that this by NO means a coincidence and is quite easy to achieve if the will is there.
Dj-M.Bezzle
5:04 AM - 14 November, 2014
Doesn't Serato have a booth every year?
Nope. First time.
Hmmm, I guess they've always partnered in the Rane booth then, because they usually have their presence there at least.
Ya, Seratos always piggybacked on other companys booth the same way they do with hardware, so if you see a serato only booth watch out cause its got termites and might fall 9n ya
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Anyway, on topic:Doesn't Serato have a booth every year?
Nope. First time.
Hmmm, I guess they've always partnered in the Rane booth then, because they usually have their presence there at least.
Ya, Seratos always piggybacked on other companys booth the same way they do with hardware, so if you see a serato only booth watch out cause its got termites and might fall 9n ya
Dj-M.Bezzle
5:04 AM - 14 November, 2014
Did I say that? No, you wanted to speak for all of us and say we'd be on Numarks or something else if that's who made the deal, and I said no.
I was on Rane for years by the time there were rumors of Serato moving into the full on DVS game.
Secondly, when Scratch Live dropped, it was on a box/soundcard, not a mixer, so we were all on our regular mixers regardless of who they partnered with.
the box/soundcard was still RANE
Quote:
Quote:
so if serato scratchLive was not associated with rane mixers/soundcards you would not be using sracthLive?Did I say that? No, you wanted to speak for all of us and say we'd be on Numarks or something else if that's who made the deal, and I said no.
I was on Rane for years by the time there were rumors of Serato moving into the full on DVS game.
Secondly, when Scratch Live dropped, it was on a box/soundcard, not a mixer, so we were all on our regular mixers regardless of who they partnered with.
Dj-M.Bezzle
5:06 AM - 14 November, 2014
i'm one of those people that has never EVER had one single issue with SDJ
You need to play the lotto soon.
It has been my experience that this by NO means a coincidence and is quite easy to achieve if the will is there.
So serato DJ works the same way as the green lanterns ring?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Since Serato has gone away exclusivity with RANE, THEIR product has suffered. SDJ vs SSL proves it. Just MY opinion.i'm one of those people that has never EVER had one single issue with SDJ
You need to play the lotto soon.
It has been my experience that this by NO means a coincidence and is quite easy to achieve if the will is there.
deejdave
5:10 AM - 14 November, 2014
LOL. Could be. BTW I am not aiming at the typical "Serato crashes........... it's all YOUR fault" thing. I am just saying what do you do about it if it does happen?
Dj Shamann
6:34 AM - 14 November, 2014
What does that have to do with what was originally said?
Let me slow it down...
Joee said, the "whole reason we're all on Rane mixers now, is because of Serato".
I said "speak for yourself, I'm on Serato because of Rane".
What is it that you think you're contradicting me on?
You guys go around in circles so much trying to prove each other wrong/catch in contradiction, that it's too hard for you to keep track of the actual conversation.
When Joee got his 52, I had this: dj.rane.com
(pre-"i" version)
Before that I used this: dj.rane.com
And this: www.rane.com
^ Not only was that a standard in clubs, it allowed guys like me to reverse the CF before anybody knew what hamster was.
You personally never heard of Rane before Serato, but the majority of DJs who'd ever played a high end system/club install (years before DVS) knew what Rane was. Serato didn't lend credibility to Rane, Rane lent credibility to Serato. Before that they were a Pro Tools plugin.
I was on Rane before Scratch Live, I was on Rane before Scratch Studio, I was on Rane before Pitch N Time. Serato has nothing to do with why I'm on Rane, did all the guys who like Pio mixers stop using them because of Serato?
Quote:
the box/soundcard was still RANEWhat does that have to do with what was originally said?
Let me slow it down...
Joee said, the "whole reason we're all on Rane mixers now, is because of Serato".
I said "speak for yourself, I'm on Serato because of Rane".
What is it that you think you're contradicting me on?
You guys go around in circles so much trying to prove each other wrong/catch in contradiction, that it's too hard for you to keep track of the actual conversation.
When Joee got his 52, I had this: dj.rane.com
(pre-"i" version)
Before that I used this: dj.rane.com
And this: www.rane.com
^ Not only was that a standard in clubs, it allowed guys like me to reverse the CF before anybody knew what hamster was.
You personally never heard of Rane before Serato, but the majority of DJs who'd ever played a high end system/club install (years before DVS) knew what Rane was. Serato didn't lend credibility to Rane, Rane lent credibility to Serato. Before that they were a Pro Tools plugin.
I was on Rane before Scratch Live, I was on Rane before Scratch Studio, I was on Rane before Pitch N Time. Serato has nothing to do with why I'm on Rane, did all the guys who like Pio mixers stop using them because of Serato?
Dj Shamann
6:52 AM - 14 November, 2014
It wouldn't matter to me, I was strictly clubs those days, I wouldn't be able to just bring in a mixer and tear it out and swap with an install. So I would've had to use Final Scratch, which I considered except that I still had up to date records at that point, for multiple genres. Anything that was truly hard to find, there was always CDJs in the booth, Final Scratch wasn't that imperative at that point.
TBH I didn't buy a Scratch Live mixer until 2010, 5 years after already using Serato.
But they didn't make good mixers when SSL dropped, so it doesn't matter.
Quote:
you right ,but humor me what if there were no sound card when serato was released & you needed to use a compatible mixer & that mixer was a numark this would be the only way to use scratchLiveIt wouldn't matter to me, I was strictly clubs those days, I wouldn't be able to just bring in a mixer and tear it out and swap with an install. So I would've had to use Final Scratch, which I considered except that I still had up to date records at that point, for multiple genres. Anything that was truly hard to find, there was always CDJs in the booth, Final Scratch wasn't that imperative at that point.
TBH I didn't buy a Scratch Live mixer until 2010, 5 years after already using Serato.
Quote:
would you have not given scratchLive a try because it was a numark mixer & if you been djing since the 80's or 90's than you remember numark used to make really good mixersBut they didn't make good mixers when SSL dropped, so it doesn't matter.
Niro
9:54 AM - 14 November, 2014
I personally know about 30 or more dudes with 62s and 0 with an 900srt.
blackavenger
11:18 AM - 14 November, 2014
Yup, that's the mixer I learned on. I hated that effing thing! Though the sound quality was proper, the EQing section & Crossfader left A LOT to be desired. It was effing expensive too....paid nearly a Grand for it!!! I got more enjoyment out of this....
dj.rane.com
Quote:
And this: www.rane.comYup, that's the mixer I learned on. I hated that effing thing! Though the sound quality was proper, the EQing section & Crossfader left A LOT to be desired. It was effing expensive too....paid nearly a Grand for it!!! I got more enjoyment out of this....
dj.rane.com
blackavenger
11:21 AM - 14 November, 2014
Yup, at least in the beginning. Now in the digital age of DJing, I would say that Serato are keeping Rane relevant.
Quote:
Serato didn't lend credibility to Rane, Rane lent credibility to Serato.Yup, at least in the beginning. Now in the digital age of DJing, I would say that Serato are keeping Rane relevant.
GKIL
11:40 AM - 14 November, 2014
they could cut the legs form under rane buy offering a serato branded sound card at half price of rane
mind = blown!
Quote:
interesting ……surely they wouldn't have a booth just to showcase software?they could cut the legs form under rane buy offering a serato branded sound card at half price of rane
mind = blown!
DJ Remix Detroit
1:48 PM - 14 November, 2014
im guessing this is the gold mine, because I've used SDJ with mavericks and yosemite, and there's more dropouts than a high school full of weed heads.
Quote:
osx lionim guessing this is the gold mine, because I've used SDJ with mavericks and yosemite, and there's more dropouts than a high school full of weed heads.
Joee
1:56 PM - 14 November, 2014
im guessing this is the gold mine, because I've used SDJ with mavericks and yosemite, and there's more dropouts than a high school full of weed heads.
my 13" retina has osx moutain lion no issues there either i use it every friday/saturday not one single problem with music or video
Quote:
Quote:
osx lionim guessing this is the gold mine, because I've used SDJ with mavericks and yosemite, and there's more dropouts than a high school full of weed heads.
my 13" retina has osx moutain lion no issues there either i use it every friday/saturday not one single problem with music or video
DJ Remix Detroit
2:07 PM - 14 November, 2014
im guessing this is the gold mine, because I've used SDJ with mavericks and yosemite, and there's more dropouts than a high school full of weed heads.
my 13" retina has osx moutain lion no issues there either i use it every friday/saturday not one single problem with music or video
yeah, I'm pretty sure lion and mountain lion are stable as can be... i don't recall seeing any real issues with lion or mountain lion. Seems most of the issues are with Mavericks and Yosemite.
but then again you have to factor that SSL works flawless on anything... so i know SDJ has a lot to do with a lot of the existing problems.
Serato has definitely taken a bigger bite than they can handle with the whole SDJ and taking on 5 million controllers. Ive read some bug threads where Serato has admitted to knowing about certain issues but still releasing the software anyway. (usb dropout light being too sensitive)
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
osx lionim guessing this is the gold mine, because I've used SDJ with mavericks and yosemite, and there's more dropouts than a high school full of weed heads.
my 13" retina has osx moutain lion no issues there either i use it every friday/saturday not one single problem with music or video
yeah, I'm pretty sure lion and mountain lion are stable as can be... i don't recall seeing any real issues with lion or mountain lion. Seems most of the issues are with Mavericks and Yosemite.
but then again you have to factor that SSL works flawless on anything... so i know SDJ has a lot to do with a lot of the existing problems.
Serato has definitely taken a bigger bite than they can handle with the whole SDJ and taking on 5 million controllers. Ive read some bug threads where Serato has admitted to knowing about certain issues but still releasing the software anyway. (usb dropout light being too sensitive)
Dj-M.Bezzle
3:38 PM - 14 November, 2014
I was on Rane before Scratch Live, I was on Rane before Scratch Studio, I was on Rane before Pitch N Time. Serato has nothing to do with why I'm on Rane, did all the guys who like Pio mixers stop using them because of Serato?
I did.
So if serato had made an exclusive deal with numark, would still be on RANE gear today?
Quote:
I was on Rane before Scratch Live, I was on Rane before Scratch Studio, I was on Rane before Pitch N Time. Serato has nothing to do with why I'm on Rane, did all the guys who like Pio mixers stop using them because of Serato?
I did.
So if serato had made an exclusive deal with numark, would still be on RANE gear today?
Dj Shamann
3:59 PM - 14 November, 2014
So because you did, everybody did?
I already answered that question, adequately. I don't know why you keep trying to hammer at that point for.
I also said that I didn't even buy an SL equipped mixer until 5 years after using Serato. To add to the Numark question since you're so fixated on it, I bought an NS6 as soon as it dropped, it's still sitting in the box.
I've also looked at Traktor on Rane hacks before.
Your problem is you try and turn things into something they're not. Joee said what he said, I said "speak for yourself", nothing more... and that's all you're going to get out of me Bezz, pick an argument with somebody who hasn't been around, it'll get you further. I mean you're still using a a hypothetical situation in which you've had to actually alter history just to bait me into contradicting what I said to Joee, take a break man ;p
Quote:
I did.So because you did, everybody did?
Quote:
So if serato had made an exclusive deal with numark, would still be on RANE gear today?I already answered that question, adequately. I don't know why you keep trying to hammer at that point for.
I also said that I didn't even buy an SL equipped mixer until 5 years after using Serato. To add to the Numark question since you're so fixated on it, I bought an NS6 as soon as it dropped, it's still sitting in the box.
I've also looked at Traktor on Rane hacks before.
Your problem is you try and turn things into something they're not. Joee said what he said, I said "speak for yourself", nothing more... and that's all you're going to get out of me Bezz, pick an argument with somebody who hasn't been around, it'll get you further. I mean you're still using a a hypothetical situation in which you've had to actually alter history just to bait me into contradicting what I said to Joee, take a break man ;p
Joee
4:09 PM - 14 November, 2014
a friend that i sold my 2008 pre unibody macbook pro 15" uses mavericks every week serato dj 1.7.0 no issues at all……i whipped the drive and did a clean install of mavericks
it's a 2.4 core two dual with only 4 gigs of rams
Quote:
yeah, I'm pretty sure lion and mountain lion are stable as can be... i don't recall seeing any real issues with lion or mountain lion. Seems most of the issues are with Mavericks and Yosemite.a friend that i sold my 2008 pre unibody macbook pro 15" uses mavericks every week serato dj 1.7.0 no issues at all……i whipped the drive and did a clean install of mavericks
it's a 2.4 core two dual with only 4 gigs of rams
Dj Shamann
4:14 PM - 14 November, 2014
LOL all of this had me remember something (possibly relevant?)
I was once offered a local sponsorship to use Numark products on TV about 2 years before Serato dropped, I refused. They even brought me in to the distribution office to demo the brand new TT's, I still refused.
I was simultaneously offered Vestax PDX 2000s and mixer to use on the show, I tried them, didn't like them (the decks) and I was given a week with them to try and change my mind, I did actually warm up to them and used them, but I refused the mixer and made the TV show buy me a Rane, just as I did with another show before them.
I use what I use because it works for me and I trust it, the software and marketing hype is secondary.
I was once offered a local sponsorship to use Numark products on TV about 2 years before Serato dropped, I refused. They even brought me in to the distribution office to demo the brand new TT's, I still refused.
I was simultaneously offered Vestax PDX 2000s and mixer to use on the show, I tried them, didn't like them (the decks) and I was given a week with them to try and change my mind, I did actually warm up to them and used them, but I refused the mixer and made the TV show buy me a Rane, just as I did with another show before them.
I use what I use because it works for me and I trust it, the software and marketing hype is secondary.
deejdave
4:44 PM - 14 November, 2014
I use all three Rekordbox, Traktor & Serato so I have open availability with hardware. I used Rane PRIOR to Serato. I now STILL have Rane Mixers but Prefer Pio. I believe this is due to my shift in music/play style. I have the benefits of Rane Sound..................... when I need it and Pioneer technology/FX..................... when I need it. There are certainly trends but I don't know if any of this is so cut & dry nor is it applicable to ALL DJ's.
I do know for a fact that If Serato originally made a deal with Numark I would probably NOT be here today.
I do know for a fact that If Serato originally made a deal with Numark I would probably NOT be here today.
Dj-M.Bezzle
4:46 PM - 14 November, 2014
I was once offered a local sponsorship to use Numark products on TV about 2 years before Serato dropped, I refused. They even brought me in to the distribution office to demo the brand new TT's, I still refused.
I was simultaneously offered Vestax PDX 2000s and mixer to use on the show, I tried them, didn't like them (the decks) and I was given a week with them to try and change my mind, I did actually warm up to them and used them, but I refused the mixer and made the TV show buy me a Rane, just as I did with another show before them.
I use what I use because it works for me and I trust it, the software and marketing hype is secondary.
I agree, thats why I still use my trusty numark dxm 09! lol
Quote:
LOL all of this had me remember something (possibly relevant?)I was once offered a local sponsorship to use Numark products on TV about 2 years before Serato dropped, I refused. They even brought me in to the distribution office to demo the brand new TT's, I still refused.
I was simultaneously offered Vestax PDX 2000s and mixer to use on the show, I tried them, didn't like them (the decks) and I was given a week with them to try and change my mind, I did actually warm up to them and used them, but I refused the mixer and made the TV show buy me a Rane, just as I did with another show before them.
I use what I use because it works for me and I trust it, the software and marketing hype is secondary.
Gio Alex
5:07 PM - 14 November, 2014
Lol... all jokes aside though, the DXMPRO was more than a decent mixer.
Quote:
I agree, thats why I still use my trusty numark dxm 09! lolLol... all jokes aside though, the DXMPRO was more than a decent mixer.
Dj-M.Bezzle
5:39 PM - 14 November, 2014
Lol... all jokes aside though, the DXMPRO was more than a decent mixer.
Im not even joking lol, the dxmpro was just a dxm 09 with a better faceplate
Quote:
Quote:
I agree, thats why I still use my trusty numark dxm 09! lolLol... all jokes aside though, the DXMPRO was more than a decent mixer.
Im not even joking lol, the dxmpro was just a dxm 09 with a better faceplate
Sally Jessy Raphael
6:50 PM - 14 November, 2014
Lol... all jokes aside though, the DXMPRO was more than a decent mixer.
Im not even joking lol, the dxmpro was just a dxm 09 with a better faceplate
Totally original
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I agree, thats why I still use my trusty numark dxm 09! lolLol... all jokes aside though, the DXMPRO was more than a decent mixer.
Im not even joking lol, the dxmpro was just a dxm 09 with a better faceplate
Totally original
Dj-M.Bezzle
7:33 PM - 14 November, 2014
Lol... all jokes aside though, the DXMPRO was more than a decent mixer.
Im not even joking lol, the dxmpro was just a dxm 09 with a better faceplate
Totally original
It is actually...
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I agree, thats why I still use my trusty numark dxm 09! lolLol... all jokes aside though, the DXMPRO was more than a decent mixer.
Im not even joking lol, the dxmpro was just a dxm 09 with a better faceplate
Totally original
It is actually...
Sally Jessy Raphael
9:30 PM - 14 November, 2014
Lol... all jokes aside though, the DXMPRO was more than a decent mixer.
Im not even joking lol, the dxmpro was just a dxm 09 with a better faceplate
Totally original
It is actually...
Just like I said.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I agree, thats why I still use my trusty numark dxm 09! lolLol... all jokes aside though, the DXMPRO was more than a decent mixer.
Im not even joking lol, the dxmpro was just a dxm 09 with a better faceplate
Totally original
It is actually...
Just like I said.
Dj-M.Bezzle
9:33 PM - 14 November, 2014
Lol... all jokes aside though, the DXMPRO was more than a decent mixer.
Im not even joking lol, the dxmpro was just a dxm 09 with a better faceplate
Totally original
It is actually...
Just like I said.
Naturally
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I agree, thats why I still use my trusty numark dxm 09! lolLol... all jokes aside though, the DXMPRO was more than a decent mixer.
Im not even joking lol, the dxmpro was just a dxm 09 with a better faceplate
Totally original
It is actually...
Just like I said.
Samuel S
11:03 PM - 25 November, 2014
Hey team,
Sorry to disappoint but this isn't accurate, we don't have a booth at NAMM 2015. We will be there in force though as usual and will be hanging out on our partner stands :)
Cheers,
Sam.
Sorry to disappoint but this isn't accurate, we don't have a booth at NAMM 2015. We will be there in force though as usual and will be hanging out on our partner stands :)
Cheers,
Sam.
Rebelguy
12:47 AM - 26 November, 2014
Sorry to disappoint but this isn't accurate, we don't have a booth at NAMM 2015. We will be there in force though as usual and will be hanging out on our partner stands :)
Cheers,
Sam.
Boo. Damn NAMM directory.
Quote:
Hey team,Sorry to disappoint but this isn't accurate, we don't have a booth at NAMM 2015. We will be there in force though as usual and will be hanging out on our partner stands :)
Cheers,
Sam.
Boo. Damn NAMM directory.
DJ GaFFle
1:45 AM - 26 November, 2014
Sorry to disappoint but this isn't accurate, we don't have a booth at NAMM 2015. We will be there in force though as usual and will be hanging out on our partner stands :)
Cheers,
Sam.
LoL, nearly 1/2 a month and over a hundred posts later...
Quote:
Hey team,Sorry to disappoint but this isn't accurate, we don't have a booth at NAMM 2015. We will be there in force though as usual and will be hanging out on our partner stands :)
Cheers,
Sam.
LoL, nearly 1/2 a month and over a hundred posts later...
Rebelguy
4:57 AM - 26 November, 2014
Sorry to disappoint but this isn't accurate, we don't have a booth at NAMM 2015. We will be there in force though as usual and will be hanging out on our partner stands :)
Cheers,
Sam.
LoL, nearly 1/2 a month and over a hundred posts later...
Maybe they were still deciding. Maybe whatever they are going to release isn't going to be ready.
Quote:
Quote:
Hey team,Sorry to disappoint but this isn't accurate, we don't have a booth at NAMM 2015. We will be there in force though as usual and will be hanging out on our partner stands :)
Cheers,
Sam.
LoL, nearly 1/2 a month and over a hundred posts later...
Maybe they were still deciding. Maybe whatever they are going to release isn't going to be ready.
Joee
12:21 PM - 26 November, 2014
they have a controller with moving platers………shhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!
& they got the licensing to make the mini 1200, like the ones biz mark was using……shhhhh!!!
keep that between us……shhhhh!!!!!!!!
Quote:
Maybe they were still deciding. Maybe whatever they are going to release isn't going to be ready.they have a controller with moving platers………shhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!
& they got the licensing to make the mini 1200, like the ones biz mark was using……shhhhh!!!
keep that between us……shhhhh!!!!!!!!
Dj-M.Bezzle
3:50 PM - 26 November, 2014
Sorry to disappoint but this isn't accurate, we don't have a booth at NAMM 2015. We will be there in force though as usual and will be hanging out on our partner stands :)
Cheers,
Sam.
LoL, nearly 1/2 a month and over a hundred posts later...
I told yall
Quote:
Quote:
Hey team,Sorry to disappoint but this isn't accurate, we don't have a booth at NAMM 2015. We will be there in force though as usual and will be hanging out on our partner stands :)
Cheers,
Sam.
LoL, nearly 1/2 a month and over a hundred posts later...
I told yall
Zach S
6:58 PM - 26 November, 2014
Serato has had their own booth in the past. Its only been the last 3 or 4 years that they piggy back off of their hardware partners.
Now to answer this:
Rane was definitely not the last hardware manufacturer Serato tried to team up with. They went after the quality companies at the time and fortunately for all they were able to team up with Rane. Rane was NEVER up for sale or in danger of shutting down. At the time Rane was was still doing very good with TTM56 sales, live gear, and Dragnet.
Before I worked for Rane I worked at a record store. When I saw Final Scratch come out I was immediately intrigued but also heard that Rane was going to put out a similar system. I waited because I new that Rane products were/are top notch... unlike Stanton.
I trusted Rane.. and still very much do.
The trust that I and others had for Rane was a HUGE contributor to the success of Scratch Live. The partnership was definitely good for both companies but without Rane's worldwide distribution channels, top notch support (and we all know supporting software is of the utmost importance), and trust Rane had with their users it would have been much harder for Serato to come forth as a leader in the game.
Now to answer this:
Quote:
From what I've heard Serato was turned down by every major company and ended up at Rane. From my understanding Serato was what saved Rane. I believe they were up for sale before this deal happened. I'm actually curious to see what happens to them in the next couple of years.Rane was definitely not the last hardware manufacturer Serato tried to team up with. They went after the quality companies at the time and fortunately for all they were able to team up with Rane. Rane was NEVER up for sale or in danger of shutting down. At the time Rane was was still doing very good with TTM56 sales, live gear, and Dragnet.
Before I worked for Rane I worked at a record store. When I saw Final Scratch come out I was immediately intrigued but also heard that Rane was going to put out a similar system. I waited because I new that Rane products were/are top notch... unlike Stanton.
I trusted Rane.. and still very much do.
The trust that I and others had for Rane was a HUGE contributor to the success of Scratch Live. The partnership was definitely good for both companies but without Rane's worldwide distribution channels, top notch support (and we all know supporting software is of the utmost importance), and trust Rane had with their users it would have been much harder for Serato to come forth as a leader in the game.
Samuel S
7:59 PM - 26 November, 2014
Sorry to disappoint but this isn't accurate, we don't have a booth at NAMM 2015. We will be there in force though as usual and will be hanging out on our partner stands :)
Cheers,
Sam.
LoL, nearly 1/2 a month and over a hundred posts later...
Maybe they were still deciding. Maybe whatever they are going to release isn't going to be ready.
I wouldn't read between the lines too much guys. We're having the same presence we've had the last few years. I'm guessing that's a mistake in the listings.
Sam.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Hey team,Sorry to disappoint but this isn't accurate, we don't have a booth at NAMM 2015. We will be there in force though as usual and will be hanging out on our partner stands :)
Cheers,
Sam.
LoL, nearly 1/2 a month and over a hundred posts later...
Maybe they were still deciding. Maybe whatever they are going to release isn't going to be ready.
I wouldn't read between the lines too much guys. We're having the same presence we've had the last few years. I'm guessing that's a mistake in the listings.
Sam.
Rebelguy
2:39 AM - 27 November, 2014
Now to answer this:
Rane was definitely not the last hardware manufacturer Serato tried to team up with. They went after the quality companies at the time and fortunately for all they were able to team up with Rane. Rane was NEVER up for sale or in danger of shutting down. At the time Rane was was still doing very good with TTM56 sales, live gear, and Dragnet.
Sorry. This information was told to me by a distributor at the last NAMM. They have been in the business awhile so I had no reason to not believe them.
Quote:
Serato has had their own booth in the past. Its only been the last 3 or 4 years that they piggy back off of their hardware partners.Now to answer this:
Quote:
From what I've heard Serato was turned down by every major company and ended up at Rane. From my understanding Serato was what saved Rane. I believe they were up for sale before this deal happened. I'm actually curious to see what happens to them in the next couple of years.Rane was definitely not the last hardware manufacturer Serato tried to team up with. They went after the quality companies at the time and fortunately for all they were able to team up with Rane. Rane was NEVER up for sale or in danger of shutting down. At the time Rane was was still doing very good with TTM56 sales, live gear, and Dragnet.
Sorry. This information was told to me by a distributor at the last NAMM. They have been in the business awhile so I had no reason to not believe them.
DJUnknown
2:43 AM - 1 December, 2014
Now to answer this:
Before I worked for Rane I worked at a record store. When I saw Final Scratch come out I was immediately intrigued but also heard that Rane was going to put out a similar system. I waited because I new that Rane products were/are top notch... unlike Stanton.
I trusted Rane.. and still very much do.
I saw Final Scratch come out and bided my time, waited for Rane, and was one of the first DJ's in my area to get it. Rane rocks, always had excellent service from them, I used to have an MP22 went through like 3 faders, sprayed everything you could think of in my mixer/fader to get rid of bleeding and static. I finally called them up one day to complain, and they said send in the mixer and the faders. They cleaned the mixer out replaced the circuit board (cause what I sprayed was eating away at it), put a new fader in there, and sent me two extra new faders. Called me up and told me the damage I caused (in a nice way), and didn't charge me one red cent, even joked that they had my fader on display as an example of what not to do with your mixer. This was all before the 52 and 54 even dropped, and then when they came out the 56 with magnetic faders...game over...they addressed and resolved the achilles problem. Rane is indeed the reason I went digital.
Quote:
Serato has had their own booth in the past. Its only been the last 3 or 4 years that they piggy back off of their hardware partners.Now to answer this:
Quote:
Before I worked for Rane I worked at a record store. When I saw Final Scratch come out I was immediately intrigued but also heard that Rane was going to put out a similar system. I waited because I new that Rane products were/are top notch... unlike Stanton.
I trusted Rane.. and still very much do.
I saw Final Scratch come out and bided my time, waited for Rane, and was one of the first DJ's in my area to get it. Rane rocks, always had excellent service from them, I used to have an MP22 went through like 3 faders, sprayed everything you could think of in my mixer/fader to get rid of bleeding and static. I finally called them up one day to complain, and they said send in the mixer and the faders. They cleaned the mixer out replaced the circuit board (cause what I sprayed was eating away at it), put a new fader in there, and sent me two extra new faders. Called me up and told me the damage I caused (in a nice way), and didn't charge me one red cent, even joked that they had my fader on display as an example of what not to do with your mixer. This was all before the 52 and 54 even dropped, and then when they came out the 56 with magnetic faders...game over...they addressed and resolved the achilles problem. Rane is indeed the reason I went digital.
Rebelguy
1:28 AM - 19 January, 2015
Anyone else hear a rumor about the 57 being revised and the Sixty One being phased out?
DJ GaFFle
2:10 AM - 19 January, 2015
Figures... you've got all-world turntablists like DJ Precision wishing they had never sold theirs.
Quote:
Anyone else hear a rumor about the 57 being revised and the Sixty One being phased out?Figures... you've got all-world turntablists like DJ Precision wishing they had never sold theirs.
Joee
1:20 AM - 20 January, 2015
this would be a good thing
?? only if they didn't sell well, come to think about it the 62 is definitely worth $300 more! maybe they didn't sell that well
Quote:
Anyone else hear a rumor about the 57 being revisedthis would be a good thing
Quote:
and the Sixty One being phased out??? only if they didn't sell well, come to think about it the 62 is definitely worth $300 more! maybe they didn't sell that well
Cuervo
1:48 AM - 20 January, 2015
this would be a good thing
?? only if they didn't sell well, come to think about it the 62 is definitely worth $300 more! maybe they didn't sell that well
What do you think that they are going to do with the TTM57? I have the TTM57 and i love it, i wish we can replace the internal serato box... anyway I like Serato SL more than Serato DJ.
Quote:
Quote:
Anyone else hear a rumor about the 57 being revisedthis would be a good thing
Quote:
and the Sixty One being phased out??? only if they didn't sell well, come to think about it the 62 is definitely worth $300 more! maybe they didn't sell that well
What do you think that they are going to do with the TTM57? I have the TTM57 and i love it, i wish we can replace the internal serato box... anyway I like Serato SL more than Serato DJ.
Joee
1:51 AM - 20 January, 2015
if they do make a new ttm57 mk2……best believe it will be for serato dj only!!!!
Quote:
What do you think that they are going to do with the TTM57?if they do make a new ttm57 mk2……best believe it will be for serato dj only!!!!
Dax
8:04 AM - 20 January, 2015
i hear theres a new mixer on the way,looks like its going to be a rotary but dont know if its a desk top or rack
Quote:
I'm actually VERY excited to see what the RANE booth will be unveiling at NAMM this Jan!i hear theres a new mixer on the way,looks like its going to be a rotary but dont know if its a desk top or rack
Code:E
8:36 AM - 20 January, 2015
I'm hoping Serato at least lets us know if they will support the new Pioneer control in Serato DJ. Maybe take advantage of the screen built in.
blackavenger
12:10 PM - 20 January, 2015
Do you mean this?
www.djtechtools.com
Quote:
I'm hoping Serato at least lets us know if they will support the new Pioneer control in Serato DJ. Maybe take advantage of the screen built in.Do you mean this?
www.djtechtools.com
Joee
2:26 PM - 20 January, 2015
Yeah, I don't think so.
put a serato dj logo on there & people just might believe it
Quote:
^ With a ScratchLIVE logo? ^Yeah, I don't think so.
put a serato dj logo on there & people just might believe it
Jordabella
7:21 PM - 20 January, 2015
So true....I also must say, that the support staff at RANE has been nothing but top notch. To be honest, I'm not a huge fan of SDJ. SSL has been rock steady for me; however, I felt that with support stopping soon, I may as well try my hand with the NEW and So-Called IMPROVED Software. I have never gone into a set worrying if/when SSL was going to crash. It seems as if now, I'm praying to the software Gods to help me make it through the night.
Quote:
Since Serato has gone away exclusivity with RANE, THEIR product has suffered. SDJ vs SSL proves it. Just MY opinion.So true....I also must say, that the support staff at RANE has been nothing but top notch. To be honest, I'm not a huge fan of SDJ. SSL has been rock steady for me; however, I felt that with support stopping soon, I may as well try my hand with the NEW and So-Called IMPROVED Software. I have never gone into a set worrying if/when SSL was going to crash. It seems as if now, I'm praying to the software Gods to help me make it through the night.
Code:E
10:43 PM - 20 January, 2015
seems like a mockup someone did years ago... I wouldn't see a mixer like that coming out anymore.
Quote:
i did say "might be"seems like a mockup someone did years ago... I wouldn't see a mixer like that coming out anymore.
Rebelguy
2:00 AM - 21 January, 2015
So true....I also must say, that the support staff at RANE has been nothing but top notch. To be honest, I'm not a huge fan of SDJ. SSL has been rock steady for me; however, I felt that with support stopping soon, I may as well try my hand with the NEW and So-Called IMPROVED Software. I have never gone into a set worrying if/when SSL was going to crash. It seems as if now, I'm praying to the software Gods to help me make it through the night.
SDJ has been very stable for me on the SL-3/turntable and DDJ-SX systems I use. I actually prefer SDJ over SSL any day of the week.
Quote:
Quote:
Since Serato has gone away exclusivity with RANE, THEIR product has suffered. SDJ vs SSL proves it. Just MY opinion.So true....I also must say, that the support staff at RANE has been nothing but top notch. To be honest, I'm not a huge fan of SDJ. SSL has been rock steady for me; however, I felt that with support stopping soon, I may as well try my hand with the NEW and So-Called IMPROVED Software. I have never gone into a set worrying if/when SSL was going to crash. It seems as if now, I'm praying to the software Gods to help me make it through the night.
SDJ has been very stable for me on the SL-3/turntable and DDJ-SX systems I use. I actually prefer SDJ over SSL any day of the week.
ral
3:42 PM - 21 January, 2015
So true....I also must say, that the support staff at RANE has been nothing but top notch. To be honest, I'm not a huge fan of SDJ. SSL has been rock steady for me; however, I felt that with support stopping soon, I may as well try my hand with the NEW and So-Called IMPROVED Software. I have never gone into a set worrying if/when SSL was going to crash. It seems as if now, I'm praying to the software Gods to help me make it through the night.
SDJ has been very stable for me on the SL-3/turntable and DDJ-SX systems I use. I actually prefer SDJ over SSL any day of the week.
computer specs? usb buffer? enabled plugin?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Since Serato has gone away exclusivity with RANE, THEIR product has suffered. SDJ vs SSL proves it. Just MY opinion.So true....I also must say, that the support staff at RANE has been nothing but top notch. To be honest, I'm not a huge fan of SDJ. SSL has been rock steady for me; however, I felt that with support stopping soon, I may as well try my hand with the NEW and So-Called IMPROVED Software. I have never gone into a set worrying if/when SSL was going to crash. It seems as if now, I'm praying to the software Gods to help me make it through the night.
SDJ has been very stable for me on the SL-3/turntable and DDJ-SX systems I use. I actually prefer SDJ over SSL any day of the week.
computer specs? usb buffer? enabled plugin?
Rebelguy
5:08 PM - 21 January, 2015
So true....I also must say, that the support staff at RANE has been nothing but top notch. To be honest, I'm not a huge fan of SDJ. SSL has been rock steady for me; however, I felt that with support stopping soon, I may as well try my hand with the NEW and So-Called IMPROVED Software. I have never gone into a set worrying if/when SSL was going to crash. It seems as if now, I'm praying to the software Gods to help me make it through the night.
SDJ has been very stable for me on the SL-3/turntable and DDJ-SX systems I use. I actually prefer SDJ over SSL any day of the week.
computer specs? usb buffer? enabled plugin?
Mid 2012 MBP
2.7 GhZ Intel Core i7
16 GB Ram
1gb Video Card
USB Buffer: 5ms
Enabled Plugins:
Serato Video
Pitch N Time
SP-6 Sample Player
I also use Mix Emergency.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Since Serato has gone away exclusivity with RANE, THEIR product has suffered. SDJ vs SSL proves it. Just MY opinion.So true....I also must say, that the support staff at RANE has been nothing but top notch. To be honest, I'm not a huge fan of SDJ. SSL has been rock steady for me; however, I felt that with support stopping soon, I may as well try my hand with the NEW and So-Called IMPROVED Software. I have never gone into a set worrying if/when SSL was going to crash. It seems as if now, I'm praying to the software Gods to help me make it through the night.
SDJ has been very stable for me on the SL-3/turntable and DDJ-SX systems I use. I actually prefer SDJ over SSL any day of the week.
computer specs? usb buffer? enabled plugin?
Mid 2012 MBP
2.7 GhZ Intel Core i7
16 GB Ram
1gb Video Card
USB Buffer: 5ms
Enabled Plugins:
Serato Video
Pitch N Time
SP-6 Sample Player
I also use Mix Emergency.
deejdave
5:13 PM - 21 January, 2015
Never had a single crash. No issues of any kind since 1.7 for me. This applies for four machines (all I7 MacBook Pro's 2012 & newer) with hardware from DJM-900SRT, SX, Akai AMX, Rane 64 & quite a bit more. As far as Plugins & expansions go............ all of them except for the SDJ upgrade as I currently do NOT own any SDJ Intro controllers. I rarely use Video but have for testing purposes. No ME though unfortunately.
lvmez
10:45 PM - 21 January, 2015
Anything from Rane? On there Instagram, they hinted about something coming out.
Joee
11:31 PM - 21 January, 2015
he just confirmed something new is coming out
Quote:
I can't give anything away, sorry guys.he just confirmed something new is coming out
woody008
11:34 PM - 21 January, 2015
A pimped out digital 56 with a 8x8 sound card, RGB buttons and MIDI/HID controls galore would be effing tits.
I'd sell my Pio DJM T1 if that happens.
I'd sell my Pio DJM T1 if that happens.
Shaun W
11:39 PM - 21 January, 2015
he just confirmed something new is coming out
Yep, totally :)
I have a feeling everyone will be happy (*fingers crossed*)
Quote:
Quote:
I can't give anything away, sorry guys.he just confirmed something new is coming out
Yep, totally :)
I have a feeling everyone will be happy (*fingers crossed*)
Joee
11:55 PM - 21 January, 2015
I have a feeling everyone will be happy (*fingers crossed*)
he just confirmed a revised ttm 57
Quote:
new ttm 57sdj maybeQuote:
Yep, totally :)I have a feeling everyone will be happy (*fingers crossed*)
he just confirmed a revised ttm 57
Shaun W
12:06 AM - 22 January, 2015
I have a feeling everyone will be happy (*fingers crossed*)
he just confirmed a revised ttm 57
LOL!
(nm)
Quote:
Quote:
new ttm 57sdj maybeQuote:
Yep, totally :)I have a feeling everyone will be happy (*fingers crossed*)
he just confirmed a revised ttm 57
LOL!
(nm)
Joee
12:09 AM - 22 January, 2015
I have a feeling everyone will be happy (*fingers crossed*)
he just confirmed a revised ttm 57
LOL!
(nm)
he did it again…….lol
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
new ttm 57sdj maybeQuote:
Yep, totally :)I have a feeling everyone will be happy (*fingers crossed*)
he just confirmed a revised ttm 57
LOL!
(nm)
he did it again…….lol
nik39
12:21 AM - 22 January, 2015
Really? Is that what you call customer service??
Then I have to switch to Traktor!!
Quote:
I can't give anything away, sorry guys.Really? Is that what you call customer service??
Then I have to switch to Traktor!!
Shaun W
12:23 AM - 22 January, 2015
Really? Is that what you call customer service??
Then I have to switch to Traktor!!
Muhaha....my plan is working ;)
Quote:
Quote:
I can't give anything away, sorry guys.Really? Is that what you call customer service??
Then I have to switch to Traktor!!
Muhaha....my plan is working ;)
Rebelguy
12:34 AM - 22 January, 2015
I have a feeling everyone will be happy (*fingers crossed*)
he just confirmed a revised ttm 57
LOL!
(nm)
Confirmed.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
new ttm 57sdj maybeQuote:
Yep, totally :)I have a feeling everyone will be happy (*fingers crossed*)
he just confirmed a revised ttm 57
LOL!
(nm)
Confirmed.
woody008
1:03 AM - 22 January, 2015
Nothing wrong with that. If Rane is to continue on a viable path they ought to innovate and explore new endeavours. Otherwise they'll wind up like Alesis.
deejdave
1:23 AM - 22 January, 2015
LMAO!!
Quote:
Did Shaun just say that they are releasing a Traktor mixer??LMAO!!
djdannyd
4:04 AM - 22 January, 2015
he just confirmed something new is coming out
Yep, totally :)
I have a feeling everyone will be happy (*fingers crossed*)
Shaun,
When will "it" be available and how much? I'll PM you my address and credit card number ;)
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I can't give anything away, sorry guys.he just confirmed something new is coming out
Yep, totally :)
I have a feeling everyone will be happy (*fingers crossed*)
Shaun,
When will "it" be available and how much? I'll PM you my address and credit card number ;)
DJ dVO
1:19 PM - 22 January, 2015
Well, it's Jan 22.....should be okay to spill the beans no? :) Oiy, I am more than excited about new Rane product.
Shaun W
2:36 PM - 22 January, 2015
We're announcing two different things today at 10am (Pacific). Availability for one will be February and the other late Feb or early March.
Only 3 1/2 hours to go! Eeek!
Only 3 1/2 hours to go! Eeek!
Joee
2:37 PM - 22 January, 2015
Only 3 1/2 hours to go! Eeek!
man thats old news, you already said a revised ttm57sdj is on the way…….lol
Quote:
We're announcing two different things today at 10am (Pacific). Availability for one will be February and the other late Feb or early March.Only 3 1/2 hours to go! Eeek!
man thats old news, you already said a revised ttm57sdj is on the way…….lol
Dj-M.Bezzle
2:43 PM - 22 January, 2015
he just confirmed something new is coming out
Yep, totally :)
I have a feeling everyone will be happy (*fingers crossed*)
Updated RANE measuring tape?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I can't give anything away, sorry guys.he just confirmed something new is coming out
Yep, totally :)
I have a feeling everyone will be happy (*fingers crossed*)
Updated RANE measuring tape?
Matt P
4:23 PM - 22 January, 2015
Really Excited to Talk about the new Rane "thing" too!
I have a feeling its gonna be a very popular item this year :)
I have a feeling its gonna be a very popular item this year :)
deejdave
4:27 PM - 22 January, 2015
I have a feeling its gonna be a very popular item this year :)
This would pretty much clarify it is NOT the Traktor partnership. Did anyone actually think that is what it was?
Quote:
Really Excited to Talk about the new Rane "thing" too!I have a feeling its gonna be a very popular item this year :)
This would pretty much clarify it is NOT the Traktor partnership. Did anyone actually think that is what it was?
boabmatic
4:31 PM - 22 January, 2015
aaaaaargh ....
Namm is looking better than last year already..
Was about to get a used ableton push but the novation pro looks nice at about the same price as I was looking to pay for the push.
or keep my pennies for the new rane "thing" :)
Namm is looking better than last year already..
Was about to get a used ableton push but the novation pro looks nice at about the same price as I was looking to pay for the push.
or keep my pennies for the new rane "thing" :)
Rebelguy
4:39 PM - 22 January, 2015
Fixed.
Quote:
Its 10 already. When are "they" getting announced?Fixed.
Shaun W
4:55 PM - 22 January, 2015
I have bad news, we're pushing the announcement date back until......just kidding. ONE more hour to GO!
boabmatic
4:59 PM - 22 January, 2015
Rane seam to have their announcement locked down, everything else is leaking onto the web like crazy at the moment.
djdannyd
5:00 PM - 22 January, 2015
Shaun, will Rane's website be updated right away with "these" new products? I'm curious about the specs and details...
jprime
5:04 PM - 22 January, 2015
I'm curious if there's someone there feeding Twitter with updates all day for those of us stuck at work :)
deejdave
5:27 PM - 22 January, 2015
WTF did I think I had to hit CTRL along with F5? LOL Learned something new!!! hahaha
Shaun W
5:28 PM - 22 January, 2015
Yes, as soon as the clock hits 10am, we'll update our website dj.rane.com and post stuff to Facebook, Twitter and Instagram :)
Quote:
Shaun, will Rane's website be updated right away with "these" new products? I'm curious about the specs and details...Yes, as soon as the clock hits 10am, we'll update our website dj.rane.com and post stuff to Facebook, Twitter and Instagram :)
deejdave
5:28 PM - 22 January, 2015
My Serato page actually reloads pretty fast automatically though. I get a Ping on my phone for new e-mail then about 5-10 seconds later I get the new message on Serato. LOL
djdannyd
5:31 PM - 22 January, 2015
Yes, as soon as the clock hits 10am, we'll update our website dj.rane.com and post stuff to Facebook, Twitter and Instagram :)
Thanks, I'm monitoring all Rane sites :)
Quote:
Quote:
Shaun, will Rane's website be updated right away with "these" new products? I'm curious about the specs and details...Yes, as soon as the clock hits 10am, we'll update our website dj.rane.com and post stuff to Facebook, Twitter and Instagram :)
Thanks, I'm monitoring all Rane sites :)
boabmatic
5:43 PM - 22 January, 2015
after all this .. I need to pop out for 30mins now so gonna miss the announcement :)
dj-freestyle
5:50 PM - 22 January, 2015
well serato dj is open to anybody doing boxes so wouldnt suprise me. not exlsuive to rane
DJ dVO
5:57 PM - 22 January, 2015
Smoke! I love you Rane. Was looking at 62 but this is for me. Was really hoping for a controller from Rane but oh well....
DJKayce
6:01 PM - 22 January, 2015
Hope Rane comes out with something special cos am tiered of all these companies merging with Serato DJ just to get a piece of the cake & forgetting to keep it professional like RANE. What happened to the good ol days of SSL?
Even Hercules, Gemini & so on are jumping in. Hmmm......
Even Hercules, Gemini & so on are jumping in. Hmmm......
DJ dVO
6:02 PM - 22 January, 2015
I was looking at 62 as a new mixer for me. I couldn't do the Sixty-One but this 57MK2 does it for me right here! P&A please....
Dj Shamann
6:02 PM - 22 January, 2015
But are those joysticks?
On the new 57 I mean...
Quote:
Why no channel LEDs?But are those joysticks?
On the new 57 I mean...
djdannyd
6:03 PM - 22 January, 2015
Shaun, No Rane turntable this year? That's ok, I'll PM you my credit card # for the 57Mk2
Quote:
Here we go! dj.rane.comShaun, No Rane turntable this year? That's ok, I'll PM you my credit card # for the 57Mk2
deejdave
6:03 PM - 22 January, 2015
But are those joysticks?
On the new 57 I mean...
Looks like it.
Quote:
Quote:
Why no channel LEDs?But are those joysticks?
On the new 57 I mean...
Looks like it.
deejdave
6:04 PM - 22 January, 2015
Doubt it. It says dedicated SDJ and there is also the "Things to know" SSL Vs. SDJ difference link right on the page.
dj-freestyle
6:05 PM - 22 January, 2015
ok cool so thats why i love my 62 i get both but would like those colored pads in my 62 :)
Rebelguy
6:06 PM - 22 January, 2015
I am going to say that the scratch live party is probably officially over and this mixer probably won't support it.
Quote:
shaun will new 57 with scratch live and serato dj ??????I am going to say that the scratch live party is probably officially over and this mixer probably won't support it.
Gio Alex
6:07 PM - 22 January, 2015
I'm so happy to see a 57 refresh without all the skittles LEDs. THANK YOU RANE! A professional looking mixer. Simplicity of the old school design with new features, YES!!!
deejdave
6:07 PM - 22 January, 2015
I am going to say that the scratch live party is probably officially over and this mixer probably won't support it.
They pretty much flat out said no. Also I am not sure how much sense it would make in terms of moving forward. No shot against SSL as it IS what got us to where we are...........
Quote:
Quote:
shaun will new 57 with scratch live and serato dj ??????I am going to say that the scratch live party is probably officially over and this mixer probably won't support it.
They pretty much flat out said no. Also I am not sure how much sense it would make in terms of moving forward. No shot against SSL as it IS what got us to where we are...........
deejdave
6:08 PM - 22 January, 2015
But are those joysticks?
On the new 57 I mean...
Looks like it.
For the joysticks that is. The channel LED's are located up top seemingly.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Why no channel LEDs?But are those joysticks?
On the new 57 I mean...
Looks like it.
For the joysticks that is. The channel LED's are located up top seemingly.
DJ dVO
6:08 PM - 22 January, 2015
Second that!
Quote:
I'm so happy to see a 57 refresh without all the skittles LEDs. THANK YOU RANE! A professional looking mixer. Simplicity of the old school design with new features, YES!!!Second that!
Detroitbootybass
6:09 PM - 22 January, 2015
I love the rotary 2015!
The TTM57mkII is also nice.
Nice job, Rane!
The TTM57mkII is also nice.
Nice job, Rane!
Gio Alex
6:11 PM - 22 January, 2015
So does the 61 sell for the price of the 56s now? Which it should lol
Dj Shamann
6:11 PM - 22 January, 2015
Oh shit, I missed that! (just woke up)
I was going to say on first impression, two cons, one major and one minor.
1. No channel LED (but that's solved)
2. Possibly not able to support SSL (I know it's on it's way out but I still use it)
Quote:
The channel LED's are located up top seemingly.Oh shit, I missed that! (just woke up)
I was going to say on first impression, two cons, one major and one minor.
1. No channel LED (but that's solved)
2. Possibly not able to support SSL (I know it's on it's way out but I still use it)
deejdave
6:13 PM - 22 January, 2015
www.numark.com
Someone in Product Development lost their minds.
Yeah this is LITERALLY NS7II with the triple screen setup that Numark offered years ago. LOL
Quote:
Someone in Product Development lost their minds.
Yeah this is LITERALLY NS7II with the triple screen setup that Numark offered years ago. LOL
deejdave
6:14 PM - 22 January, 2015
Oh shit, I missed that! (just woke up)
I was going to say on first impression, two cons, one major and one minor.
1. No channel LED (but that's solved)
2. Possibly not able to support SSL (I know it's on it's way out but I still use it)
Yeah and 2.) is seemingly a def. It seemed that way in the original link but dj.rane.com this confirms.
Quote:
Quote:
The channel LED's are located up top seemingly.Oh shit, I missed that! (just woke up)
I was going to say on first impression, two cons, one major and one minor.
1. No channel LED (but that's solved)
2. Possibly not able to support SSL (I know it's on it's way out but I still use it)
Yeah and 2.) is seemingly a def. It seemed that way in the original link but dj.rane.com this confirms.
dj-freestyle
6:15 PM - 22 January, 2015
and shaun a kit to add those pads to our 62's .............:)
Joee
6:16 PM - 22 January, 2015
i would guess the 57mk2 is going to list for the same price as the original 57
Quote:
I wonder what it's going to costi would guess the 57mk2 is going to list for the same price as the original 57
DJFree
6:19 PM - 22 January, 2015
Please and thank you.
Quote:
and shaun a kit to add those pads to our 62's .............:)Please and thank you.
dj-freestyle
6:19 PM - 22 January, 2015
rane guys say wont fit 62/ silicone rgb and back lit. so nice
deejdave
6:21 PM - 22 January, 2015
Was just gonna say. I am assuming the actual button mechanism (not what you can see but what is BELOW the surface) is different unfortunately.
Quote:
rane guys say wont fit 62/ silicone rgb and back lit. so niceWas just gonna say. I am assuming the actual button mechanism (not what you can see but what is BELOW the surface) is different unfortunately.
Dj Shamann
6:23 PM - 22 January, 2015
I'm hoping we can map these differently though, I'd rather use the INT as CUE1 (just a workflow for me)
Quote:
Classic joystick controls toggle slip, instant doubles, internal mode, censor, and transformI'm hoping we can map these differently though, I'd rather use the INT as CUE1 (just a workflow for me)
bboysupafly
6:24 PM - 22 January, 2015
Here’s the bottom line — the Rane TTM57MKII will be available late March/early April for $2199, which is around the same price as the Sixty Two.
Source: djworx.com
Source: djworx.com
Gio Alex
6:25 PM - 22 January, 2015
True. But it'll have to be in between the price of a 61 and 62, no?
Personally I don't even care for the two USBs. I feel like they did that so the would have to justify the pricing not being close to the price of a 61.
Quote:
it has 2 sound cards dont count on itTrue. But it'll have to be in between the price of a 61 and 62, no?
Personally I don't even care for the two USBs. I feel like they did that so the would have to justify the pricing not being close to the price of a 61.
blackavenger
6:26 PM - 22 January, 2015
Bummed that there has been no Advanced SP-6 announced. I thought for sure Serato was gonna drop that on us for this NAMM :-/
bboysupafly
6:29 PM - 22 January, 2015
$2199 MSRP but it will probably go down after they get hit with the reality of people wanting to pay what its actually worth.
Gio Alex
6:31 PM - 22 January, 2015
That is a lot :/
They should've just kept one usb and made it the same price as the original 57.
Quote:
Ridiculous priceThat is a lot :/
They should've just kept one usb and made it the same price as the original 57.
deejdave
6:32 PM - 22 January, 2015
Not for nothing the 64 retailed at $2199 as well but I got mine for $1799 the week of release. Just do the homework and it will be found for less. I doubt for the $1799 as said retailer coincidentally no longer carries Rane products lol BUT I am thinking $1850-$1900 won't be all that hard to find. Start saving now so no payment plans are needed and you have more leverage in your bargain hunting!!
Quote:
$2199 MSRP but it will probably go down after they get hit with the reality of people wanting to pay what its actually worth.Not for nothing the 64 retailed at $2199 as well but I got mine for $1799 the week of release. Just do the homework and it will be found for less. I doubt for the $1799 as said retailer coincidentally no longer carries Rane products lol BUT I am thinking $1850-$1900 won't be all that hard to find. Start saving now so no payment plans are needed and you have more leverage in your bargain hunting!!
Detroitbootybass
6:35 PM - 22 January, 2015
Nobody pays MSRP... I guess this will be around $1800 USD.
MPC O.G.
6:37 PM - 22 January, 2015
A lot of dudes are going to blow their tax refunds.....Thanks Rane. That Rotary mixer is INSANE. You want to talk about club installs now? The old school dudes will have this on their riders. Bet the house and kids on that.
DJFree
6:39 PM - 22 January, 2015
Exactly. This should be around 1700 MSRP. Although you won't pay the 2199 price you will still spend at least 1700.
Quote:
still i would take a 62 over this for that price.Exactly. This should be around 1700 MSRP. Although you won't pay the 2199 price you will still spend at least 1700.
deejdave
6:39 PM - 22 January, 2015
You guys see this shit!!! An SL2 made by Denon. Who the "F" allowed this one?? LMAO denondj.com
deejdave
6:40 PM - 22 January, 2015
The sixty four is a better deal.
The sixty four is a better deal.
100% agreed
Quote:
That is way over priced!!The sixty four is a better deal.
Quote:
That is way over priced!!The sixty four is a better deal.
100% agreed
Gio Alex
6:41 PM - 22 January, 2015
Well, SSL & Rane was a partnership/marriage.... not SDJ. Hence SDJ being available on other companies' controllers. Remember the whole itch thing.
Quote:
You guys see this shit!!! An SL2 made by Denon. Who the "F" allowed this one?? LMAO denondj.comWell, SSL & Rane was a partnership/marriage.... not SDJ. Hence SDJ being available on other companies' controllers. Remember the whole itch thing.
Davideon
6:43 PM - 22 January, 2015
Serato whoring it up
Quote:
You guys see this shit!!! An SL2 made by Denon. Who the "F" allowed this one?? LMAO denondj.comSerato whoring it up
deejdave
6:44 PM - 22 January, 2015
Well, SSL & Rane was a partnership/marriage.... not SDJ. Hence SDJ being available on other companies' controllers. Remember the whole itch thing.
Absolutely. I am just having a hard time find any real differences between SL2 and DS1 besides the SSL compatibility. The DS1 will be $299 and the SL2 is still $499 MSRP? Seems a bit sneaky IMO. I dunno.
Quote:
Quote:
You guys see this shit!!! An SL2 made by Denon. Who the "F" allowed this one?? LMAO denondj.comWell, SSL & Rane was a partnership/marriage.... not SDJ. Hence SDJ being available on other companies' controllers. Remember the whole itch thing.
Absolutely. I am just having a hard time find any real differences between SL2 and DS1 besides the SSL compatibility. The DS1 will be $299 and the SL2 is still $499 MSRP? Seems a bit sneaky IMO. I dunno.
geeunot
6:45 PM - 22 January, 2015
hahhah wtf!!!! thats so weird. to see another box.
Quote:
You guys see this shit!!! An SL2 made by Denon. Who the "F" allowed this one?? LMAO denondj.comhahhah wtf!!!! thats so weird. to see another box.
Rebelguy
6:48 PM - 22 January, 2015
I feel like every time Rane releases a new product people are complaining about pricing. You are paying for a top audio quality made in the USA product with an incredible 3 year warranty and a great support staff.
Rebelguy
6:51 PM - 22 January, 2015
Well, SSL & Rane was a partnership/marriage.... not SDJ. Hence SDJ being available on other companies' controllers. Remember the whole itch thing.
Absolutely. I am just having a hard time find any real differences between SL2 and DS1 besides the SSL compatibility. The DS1 will be $299 and the SL2 is still $499 MSRP? Seems a bit sneaky IMO. I dunno.
The main differences will probably be build quality and sound quality.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You guys see this shit!!! An SL2 made by Denon. Who the "F" allowed this one?? LMAO denondj.comWell, SSL & Rane was a partnership/marriage.... not SDJ. Hence SDJ being available on other companies' controllers. Remember the whole itch thing.
Absolutely. I am just having a hard time find any real differences between SL2 and DS1 besides the SSL compatibility. The DS1 will be $299 and the SL2 is still $499 MSRP? Seems a bit sneaky IMO. I dunno.
The main differences will probably be build quality and sound quality.
Shaun W
6:52 PM - 22 January, 2015
FYI MSRP is always WAY more than what the MAP (Minimum Advertised Price) is going to be.
deejdave
6:52 PM - 22 January, 2015
Yeah I was staring it at first like >................................................. uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh?????
I would expect this from Gemini or Behringer etc. but not Denon. I was hopeful for something to get them back in the game.
IMO so far this year.
1.) Rane
2.) Pioneer
3.) Numark
4.) Hercules/Korg
5.) Denon
JUST my opinions though and probably too early to call anyways.
I would expect this from Gemini or Behringer etc. but not Denon. I was hopeful for something to get them back in the game.
IMO so far this year.
1.) Rane
2.) Pioneer
3.) Numark
4.) Hercules/Korg
5.) Denon
JUST my opinions though and probably too early to call anyways.
deejdave
6:55 PM - 22 January, 2015
As we noted above. IMO It's all good with the pricing. Rane earns every dollar they make. I wish my other brands all handled their support as Rane does.
In favor of the SL2. I agree. BUT you think this matters to DJ "ScratchNsniff" who is just starting out on his 9 month career of DJing today? LOTS of these dudes LOL.
Quote:
FYI MSRP is always WAY more than what the MAP (Minimum Advertised Price) is going to be.As we noted above. IMO It's all good with the pricing. Rane earns every dollar they make. I wish my other brands all handled their support as Rane does.
Quote:
The main differences will probably be build quality and sound quality.In favor of the SL2. I agree. BUT you think this matters to DJ "ScratchNsniff" who is just starting out on his 9 month career of DJing today? LOTS of these dudes LOL.
Dj-M.Bezzle
7:07 PM - 22 January, 2015
Ya but what about the new 57 warrants it costing as much as a 62 when it does less?
Quote:
I feel like every time Rane releases a new product people are complaining about pricing. You are paying for a top audio quality made in the USA product with an incredible 3 year warranty and a great support staff.Ya but what about the new 57 warrants it costing as much as a 62 when it does less?
AustinG
7:07 PM - 22 January, 2015
I'm assuming this will be cheaper than a 62 but I'm not sure why rane would want to market this and take away sales from the 61/62. Real life, it's not much of a difference than the 62.. Don't get me wrong I love my 57 and my 62 just trying to understand the reasoning, why market 2 mixers that are very similar and probably not that far apart MSRP wise..
dj-freestyle
7:08 PM - 22 January, 2015
The new club kit thing is dope. no more switching boxes out on a nexus 900
DJFree
7:09 PM - 22 January, 2015
Ya but what about the new 57 warrants it costing as much as a 62 when it does less?
Quote:
Quote:
I feel like every time Rane releases a new product people are complaining about pricing. You are paying for a top audio quality made in the USA product with an incredible 3 year warranty and a great support staff.Ya but what about the new 57 warrants it costing as much as a 62 when it does less?
dj-freestyle
7:09 PM - 22 January, 2015
and from rane its not replacing 62 . 62 still has features 57 mk2 doesnt
Gio Alex
7:11 PM - 22 January, 2015
Well, SSL & Rane was a partnership/marriage.... not SDJ. Hence SDJ being available on other companies' controllers. Remember the whole itch thing.
Absolutely. I am just having a hard time find any real differences between SL2 and DS1 besides the SSL compatibility. The DS1 will be $299 and the SL2 is still $499 MSRP? Seems a bit sneaky IMO. I dunno.
Well the SL2 will be more because Rane and Serato want to make the most money out of a partnership. It's always been sneaky. I always said this about the mixer pricing on rane/serato mixers. It's not that they're these amazing expensive mixers, it's that both companies wanna walk out with the most bank.
I feel like like if you don't use SSL then a DS1 would suit you rather than an SL2. Price wise.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You guys see this shit!!! An SL2 made by Denon. Who the "F" allowed this one?? LMAO denondj.comWell, SSL & Rane was a partnership/marriage.... not SDJ. Hence SDJ being available on other companies' controllers. Remember the whole itch thing.
Absolutely. I am just having a hard time find any real differences between SL2 and DS1 besides the SSL compatibility. The DS1 will be $299 and the SL2 is still $499 MSRP? Seems a bit sneaky IMO. I dunno.
Well the SL2 will be more because Rane and Serato want to make the most money out of a partnership. It's always been sneaky. I always said this about the mixer pricing on rane/serato mixers. It's not that they're these amazing expensive mixers, it's that both companies wanna walk out with the most bank.
I feel like like if you don't use SSL then a DS1 would suit you rather than an SL2. Price wise.
Dj-M.Bezzle
7:12 PM - 22 January, 2015
Ya but what about the new 57 warrants it costing as much as a 62 when it does less?
Quote:
I feel like every time Rane releases a new product people are complaining about pricing. You are paying for a top audio quality made in the USA product with an incredible 3 year warranty and a great support staff.Ya but what about the new 57 warrants it costing as much as a 62 when it does less?
Dj-M.Bezzle
7:14 PM - 22 January, 2015
ya, bit what does 57 have the 62 dosent
Quote:
and from rane its not replacing 62 . 62 still has features 57 mk2 doesntya, bit what does 57 have the 62 dosent
geeunot
7:14 PM - 22 January, 2015
what new club kit thing?
Quote:
The new club kit thing is dope. no more switching boxes out on a nexus 900what new club kit thing?
Gio Alex
7:15 PM - 22 January, 2015
This is where things got weird. I agree. My theory is that the 61 was supposed to replace the 57, but it didn't match in specs because they wanted to keep selling the 57 stock. They'll probably do the same with the 61 and phase it out or make a lower msrp.
Quote:
I'm assuming this will be cheaper than a 62 but I'm not sure why rane would want to market this and take away sales from the 61/62. Real life, it's not much of a difference than the 62.. Don't get me wrong I love my 57 and my 62 just trying to understand the reasoning, why market 2 mixers that are very similar and probably not that far apart MSRP wise..This is where things got weird. I agree. My theory is that the 61 was supposed to replace the 57, but it didn't match in specs because they wanted to keep selling the 57 stock. They'll probably do the same with the 61 and phase it out or make a lower msrp.
deejdave
7:15 PM - 22 January, 2015
MY GOD so was I. I LOVE my S8 but every day I wish it was Serato screens I was looking at instead!!
what new club kit thing?
Was wondering the same thing myself? What is this now?
Quote:
Was really hoping for a 4 channel dvs ready Twitch/S8 like unit.MY GOD so was I. I LOVE my S8 but every day I wish it was Serato screens I was looking at instead!!
Quote:
Quote:
The new club kit thing is dope. no more switching boxes out on a nexus 900what new club kit thing?
Was wondering the same thing myself? What is this now?
Rebelguy
7:17 PM - 22 January, 2015
Ya but what about the new 57 warrants it costing as much as a 62 when it does less?
But it doesn't cost as much as a 62. The MSRP on the 57 MK2 is $2199. The MSRP on the 62 is $2499.
Quote:
Quote:
I feel like every time Rane releases a new product people are complaining about pricing. You are paying for a top audio quality made in the USA product with an incredible 3 year warranty and a great support staff.Ya but what about the new 57 warrants it costing as much as a 62 when it does less?
But it doesn't cost as much as a 62. The MSRP on the 57 MK2 is $2199. The MSRP on the 62 is $2499.
Rebelguy
7:18 PM - 22 January, 2015
This is where things got weird. I agree. My theory is that the 61 was supposed to replace the 57, but it didn't match in specs because they wanted to keep selling the 57 stock. They'll probably do the same with the 61 and phase it out or make a lower msrp.
I posted above yesterday the rumor I had heard about the 57 Mk2 being released and the 61 being phased out. That may be the plan.
Quote:
Quote:
I'm assuming this will be cheaper than a 62 but I'm not sure why rane would want to market this and take away sales from the 61/62. Real life, it's not much of a difference than the 62.. Don't get me wrong I love my 57 and my 62 just trying to understand the reasoning, why market 2 mixers that are very similar and probably not that far apart MSRP wise..This is where things got weird. I agree. My theory is that the 61 was supposed to replace the 57, but it didn't match in specs because they wanted to keep selling the 57 stock. They'll probably do the same with the 61 and phase it out or make a lower msrp.
I posted above yesterday the rumor I had heard about the 57 Mk2 being released and the 61 being phased out. That may be the plan.
Samuel S
7:19 PM - 22 January, 2015
what new club kit thing?
Was wondering the same thing myself? What is this now?
serato.com
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The new club kit thing is dope. no more switching boxes out on a nexus 900what new club kit thing?
Was wondering the same thing myself? What is this now?
serato.com
Gio Alex
7:21 PM - 22 January, 2015
This is where things got weird. I agree. My theory is that the 61 was supposed to replace the 57, but it didn't match in specs because they wanted to keep selling the 57 stock. They'll probably do the same with the 61 and phase it out or make a lower msrp.
I posted above yesterday the rumor I had heard about the 57 Mk2 being released and the 61 being phased out. That may be the plan.
Ah I see, I think the 61 sold poorly due to pricing and lack features. I could be wrong on the sales, but I don't know anyone who owns one. They either kept their 57 or bought the 62.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I'm assuming this will be cheaper than a 62 but I'm not sure why rane would want to market this and take away sales from the 61/62. Real life, it's not much of a difference than the 62.. Don't get me wrong I love my 57 and my 62 just trying to understand the reasoning, why market 2 mixers that are very similar and probably not that far apart MSRP wise..This is where things got weird. I agree. My theory is that the 61 was supposed to replace the 57, but it didn't match in specs because they wanted to keep selling the 57 stock. They'll probably do the same with the 61 and phase it out or make a lower msrp.
I posted above yesterday the rumor I had heard about the 57 Mk2 being released and the 61 being phased out. That may be the plan.
Ah I see, I think the 61 sold poorly due to pricing and lack features. I could be wrong on the sales, but I don't know anyone who owns one. They either kept their 57 or bought the 62.
Rebelguy
7:22 PM - 22 January, 2015
Club Kit info...
serato.com
Shit just got serious...
Allen & Heath DB2, DB4 and Xone: K1 Support
• A new collaboration between Serato and Allen & Heath will allow users of their flagship DB2 & DB4 mixers to take advantage of Serato DJ and Serato DVS, without the need for an external interface. Users can create a powerful DVS setup with the addition of the Xone: K1, which will also have Official Serato Accessory support in a forthcoming release of Serato DJ.
• The Allen & Heath DB2 and DB4 will work plug-and-play with Serato DJ, with the one-off purchase of the Serato DJ Club Kit.
serato.com
Shit just got serious...
Allen & Heath DB2, DB4 and Xone: K1 Support
• A new collaboration between Serato and Allen & Heath will allow users of their flagship DB2 & DB4 mixers to take advantage of Serato DJ and Serato DVS, without the need for an external interface. Users can create a powerful DVS setup with the addition of the Xone: K1, which will also have Official Serato Accessory support in a forthcoming release of Serato DJ.
• The Allen & Heath DB2 and DB4 will work plug-and-play with Serato DJ, with the one-off purchase of the Serato DJ Club Kit.
DJ Dynamight
7:23 PM - 22 January, 2015
The TTM57mkII is missing hardware FX--which both the Sixty-Two and Sixty-Four have built-in.
Gio Alex
7:24 PM - 22 January, 2015
what new club kit thing?
Was wondering the same thing myself? What is this now?
serato.com
I'm so confused lol. Why two more DJM serato mixers? So now 3?
You make a great point! They can't possibly ask as much considering the other mixers have hardware FX.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The new club kit thing is dope. no more switching boxes out on a nexus 900what new club kit thing?
Was wondering the same thing myself? What is this now?
serato.com
I'm so confused lol. Why two more DJM serato mixers? So now 3?
Quote:
The TTM57mkII is missing hardware FX--which both the Sixty-Two and Sixty-Four have built-in.You make a great point! They can't possibly ask as much considering the other mixers have hardware FX.
blackavenger
7:24 PM - 22 January, 2015
Totally agree, Ragman......DB2/4 support is HUGE!!!! Damn, Traktor sure did screw up not making them Traktor Scratch certified!!!
Rebelguy
7:26 PM - 22 January, 2015
Yup. The got into bed with Pioneer and blew it.
Quote:
Totally agree, Ragman......DB2/4 support is HUGE!!!! Damn, Traktor sure did screw up not making them Traktor Scratch certified!!!Yup. The got into bed with Pioneer and blew it.
Samuel S
7:26 PM - 22 January, 2015
I'm so confused lol. Why two more DJM serato mixers? So now 3?
Not new mixers :) The DJM-900NXS and DJM-850 are club standard mixers which now will support Serato DJ via USB with the Serato Club Kit license pack.
You can now head to the club if they have one of these mixers and connect directly, without the need for a separate interface.
The Pioneer DJM-900SRT still remains the flagship Serato DJ supported Pioneer mixer and doesn't require any extra license as it's plug-and-play.
Sam.
Quote:
I'm so confused lol. Why two more DJM serato mixers? So now 3?
Not new mixers :) The DJM-900NXS and DJM-850 are club standard mixers which now will support Serato DJ via USB with the Serato Club Kit license pack.
You can now head to the club if they have one of these mixers and connect directly, without the need for a separate interface.
The Pioneer DJM-900SRT still remains the flagship Serato DJ supported Pioneer mixer and doesn't require any extra license as it's plug-and-play.
Sam.
Rebelguy
7:28 PM - 22 January, 2015
what new club kit thing?
Was wondering the same thing myself? What is this now?
serato.com
I'm so confused lol. Why two more DJM serato mixers? So now 3?
You make a great point! They can't possibly ask as much considering the other mixers have hardware FX.
Price breakdown.
Rane Sixty Four MSRP: $2749
Rane Sixty Two MSRP: $2499
Rane 57 MK2 MSRP: $2199
The 57 will be cheaper.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The new club kit thing is dope. no more switching boxes out on a nexus 900what new club kit thing?
Was wondering the same thing myself? What is this now?
serato.com
I'm so confused lol. Why two more DJM serato mixers? So now 3?
Quote:
The TTM57mkII is missing hardware FX--which both the Sixty-Two and Sixty-Four have built-in.You make a great point! They can't possibly ask as much considering the other mixers have hardware FX.
Price breakdown.
Rane Sixty Four MSRP: $2749
Rane Sixty Two MSRP: $2499
Rane 57 MK2 MSRP: $2199
The 57 will be cheaper.
Gio Alex
7:28 PM - 22 January, 2015
Not new mixers :) The DJM-900NXS and DJM-850 are club standard mixers which now will support Serato DJ via USB with the Serato Club Kit license pack.
You can now head to the club if they have one of these mixers and connect directly, without the need for a separate interface.
The Pioneer DJM-900SRT still remains the flagship Serato DJ supported Pioneer mixer and doesn't require any extra license as it's plug-and-play.
Sam.
Thanks for clarifying that.
Quote:
Quote:
I'm so confused lol. Why two more DJM serato mixers? So now 3?You can now head to the club if they have one of these mixers and connect directly, without the need for a separate interface.
The Pioneer DJM-900SRT still remains the flagship Serato DJ supported Pioneer mixer and doesn't require any extra license as it's plug-and-play.
Sam.
Thanks for clarifying that.
lvmez
7:31 PM - 22 January, 2015
what new club kit thing?
Was wondering the same thing myself? What is this now?
serato.com
I'm so confused lol. Why two more DJM serato mixers? So now 3?
You make a great point! They can't possibly ask as much considering the other mixers have hardware FX.
Price breakdown.
Rane Sixty Four MSRP: $2749
Rane Sixty Two MSRP: $2499
Rane 57 MK2 MSRP: $2199
The 57 will be cheaper.
If you use the equation of getting the mixers about $1K cheaper than the 57MKII will be had for $1200.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The new club kit thing is dope. no more switching boxes out on a nexus 900what new club kit thing?
Was wondering the same thing myself? What is this now?
serato.com
I'm so confused lol. Why two more DJM serato mixers? So now 3?
Quote:
The TTM57mkII is missing hardware FX--which both the Sixty-Two and Sixty-Four have built-in.You make a great point! They can't possibly ask as much considering the other mixers have hardware FX.
Price breakdown.
Rane Sixty Four MSRP: $2749
Rane Sixty Two MSRP: $2499
Rane 57 MK2 MSRP: $2199
The 57 will be cheaper.
If you use the equation of getting the mixers about $1K cheaper than the 57MKII will be had for $1200.
nik39
7:33 PM - 22 January, 2015
REally excited to see and try the new pads on the 57mk2.
NEW pads, DUAL USB. Great!
NEW pads, DUAL USB. Great!
Gio Alex
7:33 PM - 22 January, 2015
Serato is turning into NI. Putting out so many products that due almost the same thing. I miss the days where you had 2-3 options. And those options were very different and clear as day.
Cheap - Prosumer - Pro
Now it's all over the place. It's all sales, sales, sales. You get comfortable with something for a year then they drop another the next year to make your old joint feel worthless lol.
Pioneer's move though is interesting. Making an existing mixer serato capable. Very interesting. So if only the original 57 had a usb 2.0 sound card they could've done the same thing.
Cheap - Prosumer - Pro
Now it's all over the place. It's all sales, sales, sales. You get comfortable with something for a year then they drop another the next year to make your old joint feel worthless lol.
Pioneer's move though is interesting. Making an existing mixer serato capable. Very interesting. So if only the original 57 had a usb 2.0 sound card they could've done the same thing.
deejdave
7:34 PM - 22 January, 2015
@ Samuel S
Please look at this picture www.facebook.com
Now tell me again what makes my SRT better than my 900Nexus in terms of Serato? Define this flagship title please?
I do NOT see any reason to be happy about this. This actually means that the most money I have ever spent on a DJ mixer was now in vain, no?
Quote:
The Pioneer DJM-900SRT still remains the flagship Serato DJ supported Pioneer mixer and doesn't require any extra license as it's plug-and-play.Please look at this picture www.facebook.com
Now tell me again what makes my SRT better than my 900Nexus in terms of Serato? Define this flagship title please?
I do NOT see any reason to be happy about this. This actually means that the most money I have ever spent on a DJ mixer was now in vain, no?
Gio Alex
7:35 PM - 22 January, 2015
Please look at this picture www.facebook.com
Now tell me again what makes my SRT better than my 900Nexus in terms of Serato? Define this flagship title please?
I do NOT see any reason to be happy about this. This actually means that the most money I have ever spent on a DJ mixer was now in vain, no?
Isn't that the case when you buy any Pioneer product. They've been in this habit for years now.
Quote:
@ Samuel SQuote:
The Pioneer DJM-900SRT still remains the flagship Serato DJ supported Pioneer mixer and doesn't require any extra license as it's plug-and-play.Please look at this picture www.facebook.com
Now tell me again what makes my SRT better than my 900Nexus in terms of Serato? Define this flagship title please?
I do NOT see any reason to be happy about this. This actually means that the most money I have ever spent on a DJ mixer was now in vain, no?
Isn't that the case when you buy any Pioneer product. They've been in this habit for years now.
deejdave
7:37 PM - 22 January, 2015
IMO this was NOT Pioneer's doing. This was Serato. SUCH a bad taste left in my mouth right now................. I spent a LOT of money on this thing.................... why?
Quote:
Isn't that the case when you buy any Pioneer product. They've been in this habit for years now.IMO this was NOT Pioneer's doing. This was Serato. SUCH a bad taste left in my mouth right now................. I spent a LOT of money on this thing.................... why?
Gio Alex
7:37 PM - 22 January, 2015
Hold up! So why did they need to release a 900SRT when all you had to do is make the software available for your 900NX and you're 850?
Weren't there people that sold their 900nxs to but an SRT?
Now i'm confused again. lol
Weren't there people that sold their 900nxs to but an SRT?
Now i'm confused again. lol
Samuel S
7:38 PM - 22 January, 2015
Please look at this picture www.facebook.com
Now tell me again what makes my SRT better than my 900Nexus in terms of Serato? Define this flagship title please?
I do NOT see any reason to be happy about this. This actually means that the most money I have ever spent on a DJ mixer was now in vain, no?
You don't require any extra license, it's supported by Serato DJ plug-and-play.
It's also not in vain, if you bought the DJM-900NXS it'd be almost the same thing, except you would have to also purchase the Serato Club Kit.
Sam.
Quote:
@ Samuel SQuote:
The Pioneer DJM-900SRT still remains the flagship Serato DJ supported Pioneer mixer and doesn't require any extra license as it's plug-and-play.Please look at this picture www.facebook.com
Now tell me again what makes my SRT better than my 900Nexus in terms of Serato? Define this flagship title please?
I do NOT see any reason to be happy about this. This actually means that the most money I have ever spent on a DJ mixer was now in vain, no?
You don't require any extra license, it's supported by Serato DJ plug-and-play.
It's also not in vain, if you bought the DJM-900NXS it'd be almost the same thing, except you would have to also purchase the Serato Club Kit.
Sam.
djsmuve415
7:39 PM - 22 January, 2015
"The new TTM57 MK2 keeps the same design as the original, adding a set of dual USB 2.0 audio/MIDI ports"
Are we not seeing USB 3.0 these days? this thing will be already outdated in 12 months.
Are we not seeing USB 3.0 these days? this thing will be already outdated in 12 months.
Rebelguy
7:40 PM - 22 January, 2015
S
Cheap - Prosumer - Pro
Now it's all over the place. It's all sales, sales, sales. You get comfortable with something for a year then they drop another the next year to make your old joint feel worthless lol.
Pioneer's move though is interesting. Making an existing mixer serato capable. Very interesting. So if only the original 57 had a usb 2.0 sound card they could've done the same thing.
This was because they had an exclusive with Rane. Now they can get that money. I am really not sure what the problem is. The Pro stuff is the expensive stuff...haha.
I could care less about the Pioneer move. I am more interested in the Allen & Heath move.
Traktor is pretty much screwed at this point. Serato is working with everybody which is going to widen their user base. Pioneer is probably trying to cover their bases with Recordbox as they don't have the exclusivity with Serato that Rane did.
Quote:
Serato is turning into NI. Putting out so many products that due almost the same thing. I miss the days where you had 2-3 options. And those options were very different and clear as day.Cheap - Prosumer - Pro
Now it's all over the place. It's all sales, sales, sales. You get comfortable with something for a year then they drop another the next year to make your old joint feel worthless lol.
Pioneer's move though is interesting. Making an existing mixer serato capable. Very interesting. So if only the original 57 had a usb 2.0 sound card they could've done the same thing.
This was because they had an exclusive with Rane. Now they can get that money. I am really not sure what the problem is. The Pro stuff is the expensive stuff...haha.
I could care less about the Pioneer move. I am more interested in the Allen & Heath move.
Traktor is pretty much screwed at this point. Serato is working with everybody which is going to widen their user base. Pioneer is probably trying to cover their bases with Recordbox as they don't have the exclusivity with Serato that Rane did.
Gio Alex
7:41 PM - 22 January, 2015
Please look at this picture www.facebook.com
Now tell me again what makes my SRT better than my 900Nexus in terms of Serato? Define this flagship title please?
I do NOT see any reason to be happy about this. This actually means that the most money I have ever spent on a DJ mixer was now in vain, no?
You don't require any extra license, it's supported by Serato DJ plug-and-play.
It's also not in vain, if you bought the DJM-900NXS it'd be almost the same thing, except you would have to also purchase the Serato Club Kit.
Sam.
$169 is not a lot to add serato to an existing mixer. Way less than buying an SL3 or SL4. Way less a hassle selling your 900nxs to buy a 900srt, no? I imagine some 900nxs owners did this when the 900srt came out. That's kind of messed up.
Quote:
Quote:
@ Samuel SQuote:
The Pioneer DJM-900SRT still remains the flagship Serato DJ supported Pioneer mixer and doesn't require any extra license as it's plug-and-play.Please look at this picture www.facebook.com
Now tell me again what makes my SRT better than my 900Nexus in terms of Serato? Define this flagship title please?
I do NOT see any reason to be happy about this. This actually means that the most money I have ever spent on a DJ mixer was now in vain, no?
You don't require any extra license, it's supported by Serato DJ plug-and-play.
It's also not in vain, if you bought the DJM-900NXS it'd be almost the same thing, except you would have to also purchase the Serato Club Kit.
Sam.
$169 is not a lot to add serato to an existing mixer. Way less than buying an SL3 or SL4. Way less a hassle selling your 900nxs to buy a 900srt, no? I imagine some 900nxs owners did this when the 900srt came out. That's kind of messed up.
Rebelguy
7:44 PM - 22 January, 2015
Are we not seeing USB 3.0 these days? this thing will be already outdated in 12 months.
USB 2.0 has no problem handling up to 24 channels of audio and has a wider user base. Also...can you name any company that has released an audio interface using USB 3.0.
Quote:
"The new TTM57 MK2 keeps the same design as the original, adding a set of dual USB 2.0 audio/MIDI ports"Are we not seeing USB 3.0 these days? this thing will be already outdated in 12 months.
USB 2.0 has no problem handling up to 24 channels of audio and has a wider user base. Also...can you name any company that has released an audio interface using USB 3.0.
deejdave
7:46 PM - 22 January, 2015
@ Samuel S
But I was plenty happy with my Nexus. I just wanted the Serato connectivity without external SL box. Explain to me now why my purchase of the SRT WHILE owning the Nexus WAS a good move now?
Don't get me wrong I am a constant defender of Serato (ask anyone here) but I fail to see how this should not make me upset.
Quote:
It's also not in vain, if you bought the DJM-900NXS it'd be almost the same thing, except you would have to also purchase the Serato Club Kit.But I was plenty happy with my Nexus. I just wanted the Serato connectivity without external SL box. Explain to me now why my purchase of the SRT WHILE owning the Nexus WAS a good move now?
Don't get me wrong I am a constant defender of Serato (ask anyone here) but I fail to see how this should not make me upset.
Gio Alex
7:46 PM - 22 January, 2015
Are we not seeing USB 3.0 these days? this thing will be already outdated in 12 months.
USB 2.0 has no problem handling up to 24 channels of audio and has a wider user base. Also...can you name any company that has released an audio interface using USB 3.0.
He doesn't understand usb 2.0-3.0. To him it's just a higher number and doesn't understand how audio works. You're right, there are no usb 3.0 interfaces. Most if anything, went thunderbolt to free up ports. Also the pro ones like universal audio will have dual thunderbolt for daisy chaining.
Quote:
Quote:
"The new TTM57 MK2 keeps the same design as the original, adding a set of dual USB 2.0 audio/MIDI ports"Are we not seeing USB 3.0 these days? this thing will be already outdated in 12 months.
USB 2.0 has no problem handling up to 24 channels of audio and has a wider user base. Also...can you name any company that has released an audio interface using USB 3.0.
He doesn't understand usb 2.0-3.0. To him it's just a higher number and doesn't understand how audio works. You're right, there are no usb 3.0 interfaces. Most if anything, went thunderbolt to free up ports. Also the pro ones like universal audio will have dual thunderbolt for daisy chaining.
Gio Alex
7:48 PM - 22 January, 2015
But I was plenty happy with my Nexus. I just wanted the Serato connectivity without external SL box. Explain to me now why my purchase of the SRT WHILE owning the Nexus WAS a good move now?
...and that's where they get ya. It's all about money and sales.
Quote:
@ Samuel SQuote:
It's also not in vain, if you bought the DJM-900NXS it'd be almost the same thing, except you would have to also purchase the Serato Club Kit.But I was plenty happy with my Nexus. I just wanted the Serato connectivity without external SL box. Explain to me now why my purchase of the SRT WHILE owning the Nexus WAS a good move now?
...and that's where they get ya. It's all about money and sales.
nik39
7:50 PM - 22 January, 2015
IMO this was NOT Pioneer's doing. This was Serato. SUCH a bad taste left in my mouth right now................. I spent a LOT of money on this thing.................... why?
The 900SRT also has *four* phono inputs/pre-amps!
Quote:
Quote:
Isn't that the case when you buy any Pioneer product. They've been in this habit for years now.IMO this was NOT Pioneer's doing. This was Serato. SUCH a bad taste left in my mouth right now................. I spent a LOT of money on this thing.................... why?
The 900SRT also has *four* phono inputs/pre-amps!
djsmuve415
7:51 PM - 22 January, 2015
Are we not seeing USB 3.0 these days? this thing will be already outdated in 12 months.
USB 2.0 has no problem handling up to 24 channels of audio and has a wider user base. Also...can you name any company that has released an audio interface using USB 3.0.
He doesn't understand usb 2.0-3.0. To him it's just a higher number and doesn't understand how audio works. You're right, there are no usb 3.0 interfaces. Most if anything, went thunderbolt to free up ports. Also the pro ones like universal audio will have dual thunderbolt for daisy chaining.
be it as it may.. all I know is fuckers complaining about the first one all the time with its 1.0 - so how is this still not 2 years late to the party?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
"The new TTM57 MK2 keeps the same design as the original, adding a set of dual USB 2.0 audio/MIDI ports"Are we not seeing USB 3.0 these days? this thing will be already outdated in 12 months.
USB 2.0 has no problem handling up to 24 channels of audio and has a wider user base. Also...can you name any company that has released an audio interface using USB 3.0.
He doesn't understand usb 2.0-3.0. To him it's just a higher number and doesn't understand how audio works. You're right, there are no usb 3.0 interfaces. Most if anything, went thunderbolt to free up ports. Also the pro ones like universal audio will have dual thunderbolt for daisy chaining.
be it as it may.. all I know is fuckers complaining about the first one all the time with its 1.0 - so how is this still not 2 years late to the party?
nik39
7:51 PM - 22 January, 2015
But are those joysticks?
Any comments on the missing VU meter?
Quote:
Why no channel LEDs?But are those joysticks?
Any comments on the missing VU meter?
Rebelguy
7:53 PM - 22 January, 2015
You don't require any extra license, it's supported by Serato DJ plug-and-play.
It's also not in vain, if you bought the DJM-900NXS it'd be almost the same thing, except you would have to also purchase the Serato Club Kit.
Sam.
My problem with this is that a DJM-900SRT costs about $300 more than a DJM-900NXS for what is essentially the same mixer with Serato support. You can now get this same support for $169 so new buyers have no reason to buy an SRT and SRT owners basically paid more for something that is basically a software code and two extra phono inputs.
Quote:
You don't require any extra license, it's supported by Serato DJ plug-and-play.
It's also not in vain, if you bought the DJM-900NXS it'd be almost the same thing, except you would have to also purchase the Serato Club Kit.
Sam.
My problem with this is that a DJM-900SRT costs about $300 more than a DJM-900NXS for what is essentially the same mixer with Serato support. You can now get this same support for $169 so new buyers have no reason to buy an SRT and SRT owners basically paid more for something that is basically a software code and two extra phono inputs.
Logisticalstyles
7:54 PM - 22 January, 2015
But are those joysticks?
Any comments on the missing VU meter?
They aren't missing. They are there.
Quote:
Quote:
Why no channel LEDs?But are those joysticks?
Any comments on the missing VU meter?
They aren't missing. They are there.
Gio Alex
7:57 PM - 22 January, 2015
Are we not seeing USB 3.0 these days? this thing will be already outdated in 12 months.
USB 2.0 has no problem handling up to 24 channels of audio and has a wider user base. Also...can you name any company that has released an audio interface using USB 3.0.
He doesn't understand usb 2.0-3.0. To him it's just a higher number and doesn't understand how audio works. You're right, there are no usb 3.0 interfaces. Most if anything, went thunderbolt to free up ports. Also the pro ones like universal audio will have dual thunderbolt for daisy chaining.
be it as it may.. all I know is fuckers complaining about the first one all the time with its 1.0 - so how is this still not 2 years late to the party?
That's because USB 1 actually prevented it from certain features even at the time. Even then, NI's audio interface and other companies were using usb 2.0. Never really understand why rane or serato went that route.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
"The new TTM57 MK2 keeps the same design as the original, adding a set of dual USB 2.0 audio/MIDI ports"Are we not seeing USB 3.0 these days? this thing will be already outdated in 12 months.
USB 2.0 has no problem handling up to 24 channels of audio and has a wider user base. Also...can you name any company that has released an audio interface using USB 3.0.
He doesn't understand usb 2.0-3.0. To him it's just a higher number and doesn't understand how audio works. You're right, there are no usb 3.0 interfaces. Most if anything, went thunderbolt to free up ports. Also the pro ones like universal audio will have dual thunderbolt for daisy chaining.
be it as it may.. all I know is fuckers complaining about the first one all the time with its 1.0 - so how is this still not 2 years late to the party?
That's because USB 1 actually prevented it from certain features even at the time. Even then, NI's audio interface and other companies were using usb 2.0. Never really understand why rane or serato went that route.
deejdave
7:58 PM - 22 January, 2015
This would be a good selling point for someone who wanted to connect four TT's. I have six and have not connected any more than two in the past 5 years or so.
4 phono inputs, LED colors, magnetic fader on the SRT that's about it. NONE of these justify the almost $2,000 this mixer cost me.
I remember when the SRT came out it was tough enough justifying the purchase of the SRT when you had the Nexus. Now.................. IMPOSSIBLE. There is NO justification. I got my Nexus for 1,150. The expansion costs what $100 at the most? Instead $2,000 on now what would be considered almost the same exact mixer!!!???!!??
1.) Rane
2.) Pioneer
3.) Numark
4.) Hercules/Korg
5.) Denon
JUST my opinions though and probably too early to call anyways.
See it WAS too early to call I just didn't think it would be ................... this.
Pioneer's announcements - Cool
Rane's announcements - Awesome
Numark, Hercules, Korg, etc - ehhh
Serato's announcements - F....M....L!!!!
4 phono inputs, LED colors, magnetic fader on the SRT that's about it. NONE of these justify the almost $2,000 this mixer cost me.
I remember when the SRT came out it was tough enough justifying the purchase of the SRT when you had the Nexus. Now.................. IMPOSSIBLE. There is NO justification. I got my Nexus for 1,150. The expansion costs what $100 at the most? Instead $2,000 on now what would be considered almost the same exact mixer!!!???!!??
Quote:
IMO so far this year.1.) Rane
2.) Pioneer
3.) Numark
4.) Hercules/Korg
5.) Denon
JUST my opinions though and probably too early to call anyways.
See it WAS too early to call I just didn't think it would be ................... this.
Pioneer's announcements - Cool
Rane's announcements - Awesome
Numark, Hercules, Korg, etc - ehhh
Serato's announcements - F....M....L!!!!
Rebelguy
7:58 PM - 22 January, 2015
be it as it may.. all I know is fuckers complaining about the first one all the time with its 1.0 - so how is this still not 2 years late to the party?
People are complaining because Serato no longer supported it because they said it wasn't compatible with Serato DJ. I am guessing there are other reasons as the DDJ-SX is USB 1.0 and works perfectly fine with Serato DJ. I can understand your concern but realistically the 57 was an 8 years old product. Most companies are assuming you are going to get 3 years on a product if that. if the 57 MK2 last 8 years it is another classic.
Quote:
be it as it may.. all I know is fuckers complaining about the first one all the time with its 1.0 - so how is this still not 2 years late to the party?
People are complaining because Serato no longer supported it because they said it wasn't compatible with Serato DJ. I am guessing there are other reasons as the DDJ-SX is USB 1.0 and works perfectly fine with Serato DJ. I can understand your concern but realistically the 57 was an 8 years old product. Most companies are assuming you are going to get 3 years on a product if that. if the 57 MK2 last 8 years it is another classic.
djsmuve415
7:58 PM - 22 January, 2015
It's also not in vain, if you bought the DJM-900NXS it'd be almost the same thing, except you would have to also purchase the Serato Club Kit.
Sam.
My problem with this is that a DJM-900SRT costs about $300 more than a DJM-900NXS for what is essentially the same mixer with Serato support. You can now get this same support for $169 so new buyers have no reason to buy an SRT and SRT owners basically paid more for something that is basically a software code and two extra phono inputs.
yeah, this does seemed kinda jacked up.
Quote:
Quote:
You don't require any extra license, it's supported by Serato DJ plug-and-play.It's also not in vain, if you bought the DJM-900NXS it'd be almost the same thing, except you would have to also purchase the Serato Club Kit.
Sam.
My problem with this is that a DJM-900SRT costs about $300 more than a DJM-900NXS for what is essentially the same mixer with Serato support. You can now get this same support for $169 so new buyers have no reason to buy an SRT and SRT owners basically paid more for something that is basically a software code and two extra phono inputs.
yeah, this does seemed kinda jacked up.
Gio Alex
7:59 PM - 22 January, 2015
It's also not in vain, if you bought the DJM-900NXS it'd be almost the same thing, except you would have to also purchase the Serato Club Kit.
Sam.
My problem with this is that a DJM-900SRT costs about $300 more than a DJM-900NXS for what is essentially the same mixer with Serato support. You can now get this same support for $169 so new buyers have no reason to buy an SRT and SRT owners basically paid more for something that is basically a software code and two extra phono inputs.
BING BING BING!!!! lol That's pioneer or srt for ya. I say pioneer because they're a greedy company who pumps out products every other month.
Quote:
Quote:
You don't require any extra license, it's supported by Serato DJ plug-and-play.It's also not in vain, if you bought the DJM-900NXS it'd be almost the same thing, except you would have to also purchase the Serato Club Kit.
Sam.
My problem with this is that a DJM-900SRT costs about $300 more than a DJM-900NXS for what is essentially the same mixer with Serato support. You can now get this same support for $169 so new buyers have no reason to buy an SRT and SRT owners basically paid more for something that is basically a software code and two extra phono inputs.
BING BING BING!!!! lol That's pioneer or srt for ya. I say pioneer because they're a greedy company who pumps out products every other month.
DJ Irv
8:07 PM - 22 January, 2015
Serato is getting their money right. They will have almost every DJ out there buy the Serato Club Kit for $169. Think about how genius a move it is. They are basically selling you the right to use Serato DJ on a mixer we knew all along would work with Serato DJ.
Despite the BS they serve us about magic fairy dust inside Serato DJ certified mixers Serato DJ will work on almost any mixer with a USB soundcard. Serato = pimps DJ = whores
Despite the BS they serve us about magic fairy dust inside Serato DJ certified mixers Serato DJ will work on almost any mixer with a USB soundcard. Serato = pimps DJ = whores
deejdave
8:10 PM - 22 January, 2015
While I agree Pioneer has a completely reckless release schedule which basically shits on all current owners (then again this is the way of life and profit) this to me seems more like a Serato decision. Plainly put (at this point) the SRT should have NEVER happened and the support should have just been added from the start. I would have done anything for a glimpse into the future knowing this would happen.
There were even threads on this where most of us agreed "nah they'd never do that to us" and "how would current SRT owners feel if this happened" BAM!!!
Quote:
BING BING BING!!!! lol That's pioneer or srt for ya. I say pioneer because they're a greedy company who pumps out products every other month.While I agree Pioneer has a completely reckless release schedule which basically shits on all current owners (then again this is the way of life and profit) this to me seems more like a Serato decision. Plainly put (at this point) the SRT should have NEVER happened and the support should have just been added from the start. I would have done anything for a glimpse into the future knowing this would happen.
There were even threads on this where most of us agreed "nah they'd never do that to us" and "how would current SRT owners feel if this happened" BAM!!!
Gio Alex
8:12 PM - 22 January, 2015
If that's the direction things are going...
So, serato, can I get support for my DJM-T1 and my Denon DN-X600? :) I'll gladly pay 169 each.
I doubt it though. Wishful thinking.
So, serato, can I get support for my DJM-T1 and my Denon DN-X600? :) I'll gladly pay 169 each.
I doubt it though. Wishful thinking.
deejdave
8:14 PM - 22 January, 2015
I don't want to believe this. After all the money I have put into MOSTLY Serato gear. Now peeps who spent WAY less with NO intention of using Serato EVER will have the same capabilities I do for what $170
So, serato, can I get support for my DJM-T1 and my Denon DN-X600? :) I'll gladly pay 169 each.
Seriously though. At this point where is the line drawn?
Quote:
Despite the BS they serve us about magic fairy dust inside Serato DJ certified mixers Serato DJ will work on almost any mixer with a USB soundcard. Serato = pimps DJ = whoresI don't want to believe this. After all the money I have put into MOSTLY Serato gear. Now peeps who spent WAY less with NO intention of using Serato EVER will have the same capabilities I do for what $170
Quote:
If that's the direction things are going...So, serato, can I get support for my DJM-T1 and my Denon DN-X600? :) I'll gladly pay 169 each.
Seriously though. At this point where is the line drawn?
Gio Alex
8:20 PM - 22 January, 2015
I don't want to believe this. After all the money I have put into MOSTLY Serato gear. Now peeps who spent WAY less with NO intention of using Serato EVER will have the same capabilities I do for what $170
So, serato, can I get support for my DJM-T1 and my Denon DN-X600? :) I'll gladly pay 169 each.
Seriously though. At this point where is the line drawn?
Seriously right!!? Lol
Probably can't be on discontinued mixers even though i just got a djm-t1. its a big ass two channel mixer. Would love to not have to bring an sl3 on top of that for mobile gigs.
Quote:
Quote:
Despite the BS they serve us about magic fairy dust inside Serato DJ certified mixers Serato DJ will work on almost any mixer with a USB soundcard. Serato = pimps DJ = whoresI don't want to believe this. After all the money I have put into MOSTLY Serato gear. Now peeps who spent WAY less with NO intention of using Serato EVER will have the same capabilities I do for what $170
Quote:
If that's the direction things are going...So, serato, can I get support for my DJM-T1 and my Denon DN-X600? :) I'll gladly pay 169 each.
Seriously though. At this point where is the line drawn?
Seriously right!!? Lol
Probably can't be on discontinued mixers even though i just got a djm-t1. its a big ass two channel mixer. Would love to not have to bring an sl3 on top of that for mobile gigs.
lvmez
8:21 PM - 22 January, 2015
I don't want to believe this. After all the money I have put into MOSTLY Serato gear. Now peeps who spent WAY less with NO intention of using Serato EVER will have the same capabilities I do for what $170
So, serato, can I get support for my DJM-T1 and my Denon DN-X600? :) I'll gladly pay 169 each.
Seriously though. At this point where is the line drawn?
Your first mistake was thinking there was a line. These companies are about making profits. Nothing else.
Quote:
Quote:
Despite the BS they serve us about magic fairy dust inside Serato DJ certified mixers Serato DJ will work on almost any mixer with a USB soundcard. Serato = pimps DJ = whoresI don't want to believe this. After all the money I have put into MOSTLY Serato gear. Now peeps who spent WAY less with NO intention of using Serato EVER will have the same capabilities I do for what $170
Quote:
If that's the direction things are going...So, serato, can I get support for my DJM-T1 and my Denon DN-X600? :) I'll gladly pay 169 each.
Seriously though. At this point where is the line drawn?
Your first mistake was thinking there was a line. These companies are about making profits. Nothing else.
deejdave
8:27 PM - 22 January, 2015
Honestly I mean this. I always put Serato in a different category. Always have. I can not believe how wrong I have been. As little as this may seem to some this to me is as ruthless as it gets. The Denon DS1 thing I mentioned earlier yeah kinda a slap in the face towards Rane mostly but this one helps EVERYONE involved (Serato & Pioneer) while burning who?
That's all I'm gonna say about this. It's not like I am trying to start an uprising. It's not like I can do anything about this (well probably could ........... but won't) and in the end I am just at a loss.
Quote:
Your first mistake was thinking there was a line. These companies are about making profits. Nothing else.Honestly I mean this. I always put Serato in a different category. Always have. I can not believe how wrong I have been. As little as this may seem to some this to me is as ruthless as it gets. The Denon DS1 thing I mentioned earlier yeah kinda a slap in the face towards Rane mostly but this one helps EVERYONE involved (Serato & Pioneer) while burning who?
That's all I'm gonna say about this. It's not like I am trying to start an uprising. It's not like I can do anything about this (well probably could ........... but won't) and in the end I am just at a loss.
dj-freestyle
8:30 PM - 22 January, 2015
Companys become comapnys to make money first. always rememebr that and the exclsive deal with rane is over so why not expand. makes sense.
DJ Irv
8:33 PM - 22 January, 2015
Serato is starting feel like the Goldman Sachs of DJ'ing. I wish I had their business sense.
Gio Alex
8:36 PM - 22 January, 2015
Honestly I mean this. I always put Serato in a different category. Always have. I can not believe how wrong I have been. As little as this may seem to some this to me is as ruthless as it gets. The Denon DS1 thing I mentioned earlier yeah kinda a slap in the face towards Rane mostly but this one helps EVERYONE involved (Serato & Pioneer) while burning who?
That's all I'm gonna say about this. It's not like I am trying to start an uprising. It's not like I can do anything about this (well probably could ........... but won't) and in the end I am just at a loss.
The pioneer 900SRT vs 900NXS is a real dirty move though. That one's really messed up. Like MAJOR messed up.
Quote:
Quote:
Your first mistake was thinking there was a line. These companies are about making profits. Nothing else.Honestly I mean this. I always put Serato in a different category. Always have. I can not believe how wrong I have been. As little as this may seem to some this to me is as ruthless as it gets. The Denon DS1 thing I mentioned earlier yeah kinda a slap in the face towards Rane mostly but this one helps EVERYONE involved (Serato & Pioneer) while burning who?
That's all I'm gonna say about this. It's not like I am trying to start an uprising. It's not like I can do anything about this (well probably could ........... but won't) and in the end I am just at a loss.
The pioneer 900SRT vs 900NXS is a real dirty move though. That one's really messed up. Like MAJOR messed up.
geeunot
8:38 PM - 22 January, 2015
Honestly I mean this. I always put Serato in a different category. Always have. I can not believe how wrong I have been. As little as this may seem to some this to me is as ruthless as it gets. The Denon DS1 thing I mentioned earlier yeah kinda a slap in the face towards Rane mostly but this one helps EVERYONE involved (Serato & Pioneer) while burning who?
That's all I'm gonna say about this. It's not like I am trying to start an uprising. It's not like I can do anything about this (well probably could ........... but won't) and in the end I am just at a loss.
The pioneer 900SRT vs 900NXS is a real dirty move though. That one's really messed up. Like MAJOR messed up.
yeah man wtf!!!!!!! there go the sales on the SRT.....i see a rise in the nexus ones now. damn that sucks for SRT owners.
i want a 57mkII asap! was close to getting a 62 at one point but i like the 57 more.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Your first mistake was thinking there was a line. These companies are about making profits. Nothing else.Honestly I mean this. I always put Serato in a different category. Always have. I can not believe how wrong I have been. As little as this may seem to some this to me is as ruthless as it gets. The Denon DS1 thing I mentioned earlier yeah kinda a slap in the face towards Rane mostly but this one helps EVERYONE involved (Serato & Pioneer) while burning who?
That's all I'm gonna say about this. It's not like I am trying to start an uprising. It's not like I can do anything about this (well probably could ........... but won't) and in the end I am just at a loss.
The pioneer 900SRT vs 900NXS is a real dirty move though. That one's really messed up. Like MAJOR messed up.
yeah man wtf!!!!!!! there go the sales on the SRT.....i see a rise in the nexus ones now. damn that sucks for SRT owners.
i want a 57mkII asap! was close to getting a 62 at one point but i like the 57 more.
DJ Irv
8:38 PM - 22 January, 2015
if your 900NXS is under warranty than flash it with the 900SRT firmware. If it breaks send it back and you don't know what happened. If it works then no need to buy a BS expansion pack.
blackavenger
8:39 PM - 22 January, 2015
No new advancements announced for SeratoDJ = MAJOR DISAPPOINTMENT!!!
All we have here is more hardware and licensing.
All we have here is more hardware and licensing.
Papa Midnight
8:39 PM - 22 January, 2015
Are we not seeing USB 3.0 these days? this thing will be already outdated in 12 months.
USB 2.0 has no problem handling up to 24 channels of audio and has a wider user base. Also...can you name any company that has released an audio interface using USB 3.0.
He doesn't understand usb 2.0-3.0. To him it's just a higher number and doesn't understand how audio works. You're right, there are no usb 3.0 interfaces. Most if anything, went thunderbolt to free up ports. Also the pro ones like universal audio will have dual thunderbolt for daisy chaining.
While he may not have formulated his argument correctly, his question should not be dismissed. So there aren't a high number of USB 3.0 interfaces right now. That doesn't mean that it's not a viable path to take.
USB 3.0 offers several advantages over USB 2.0 that I think manufacturers should take a serious look at. As an example, USB 3.0 has eliminated polling, and replaced it with asynchronous timing. USB 3.0 increases the allotted power specification for devices.
While there are several other improvements (some obvious, such as the increased bandwidth capacities), the biggest one here that will probably affect audio manufacturers is that USB 3.0 is FULL Duplex (as opposed to USB 2.0 having been half-duplex).
The other problem you're faced with, in terms of Thunderbolt, is adoption. Despite being an Intel technology, Thunderbolt does not appear on most Intel devices outside of the Apple space; and contrary to what most people believe, Audio Manufacturers actually have noticed that there is another segment of consumers that use their products.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
"The new TTM57 MK2 keeps the same design as the original, adding a set of dual USB 2.0 audio/MIDI ports"Are we not seeing USB 3.0 these days? this thing will be already outdated in 12 months.
USB 2.0 has no problem handling up to 24 channels of audio and has a wider user base. Also...can you name any company that has released an audio interface using USB 3.0.
He doesn't understand usb 2.0-3.0. To him it's just a higher number and doesn't understand how audio works. You're right, there are no usb 3.0 interfaces. Most if anything, went thunderbolt to free up ports. Also the pro ones like universal audio will have dual thunderbolt for daisy chaining.
While he may not have formulated his argument correctly, his question should not be dismissed. So there aren't a high number of USB 3.0 interfaces right now. That doesn't mean that it's not a viable path to take.
USB 3.0 offers several advantages over USB 2.0 that I think manufacturers should take a serious look at. As an example, USB 3.0 has eliminated polling, and replaced it with asynchronous timing. USB 3.0 increases the allotted power specification for devices.
While there are several other improvements (some obvious, such as the increased bandwidth capacities), the biggest one here that will probably affect audio manufacturers is that USB 3.0 is FULL Duplex (as opposed to USB 2.0 having been half-duplex).
The other problem you're faced with, in terms of Thunderbolt, is adoption. Despite being an Intel technology, Thunderbolt does not appear on most Intel devices outside of the Apple space; and contrary to what most people believe, Audio Manufacturers actually have noticed that there is another segment of consumers that use their products.
Gio Alex
8:47 PM - 22 January, 2015
Are we not seeing USB 3.0 these days? this thing will be already outdated in 12 months.
USB 2.0 has no problem handling up to 24 channels of audio and has a wider user base. Also...can you name any company that has released an audio interface using USB 3.0.
He doesn't understand usb 2.0-3.0. To him it's just a higher number and doesn't understand how audio works. You're right, there are no usb 3.0 interfaces. Most if anything, went thunderbolt to free up ports. Also the pro ones like universal audio will have dual thunderbolt for daisy chaining.
While he may not have formulated his argument correctly, his question should not be dismissed. So there aren't a high number of USB 3.0 interfaces right now. That doesn't mean that it's not a viable path to take.
USB 3.0 offers several advantages over USB 2.0 that I think manufacturers should take a serious look at. As an example, USB 3.0 has eliminated polling, and replaced it with asynchronous timing. USB 3.0 increases the allotted power specification for devices.
While there are several other improvements (some obvious, such as the increased bandwidth capacities), the biggest one here that will probably affect audio manufacturers is that USB 3.0 is FULL Duplex (as opposed to USB 2.0 having been half-duplex).
The other problem you're faced with, in terms of Thunderbolt, is adoption. Despite being an Intel technology, Thunderbolt does not appear on most Intel devices outside of the Apple space; and contrary to what most people believe, Audio Manufacturers actually have noticed that there is another segment of consumers that use their products.
You bring up some good points.
I actually first saw thunderbolt on an HP. Not trying to start a PC vs Mac war, I appreciate them both, but if you're doing production or DJing, it's waaaaaaaay less of a headache on a mac. Like a said, the pro level audio interfaces use thunderbolt and there's a good reason for that.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
"The new TTM57 MK2 keeps the same design as the original, adding a set of dual USB 2.0 audio/MIDI ports"Are we not seeing USB 3.0 these days? this thing will be already outdated in 12 months.
USB 2.0 has no problem handling up to 24 channels of audio and has a wider user base. Also...can you name any company that has released an audio interface using USB 3.0.
He doesn't understand usb 2.0-3.0. To him it's just a higher number and doesn't understand how audio works. You're right, there are no usb 3.0 interfaces. Most if anything, went thunderbolt to free up ports. Also the pro ones like universal audio will have dual thunderbolt for daisy chaining.
While he may not have formulated his argument correctly, his question should not be dismissed. So there aren't a high number of USB 3.0 interfaces right now. That doesn't mean that it's not a viable path to take.
USB 3.0 offers several advantages over USB 2.0 that I think manufacturers should take a serious look at. As an example, USB 3.0 has eliminated polling, and replaced it with asynchronous timing. USB 3.0 increases the allotted power specification for devices.
While there are several other improvements (some obvious, such as the increased bandwidth capacities), the biggest one here that will probably affect audio manufacturers is that USB 3.0 is FULL Duplex (as opposed to USB 2.0 having been half-duplex).
The other problem you're faced with, in terms of Thunderbolt, is adoption. Despite being an Intel technology, Thunderbolt does not appear on most Intel devices outside of the Apple space; and contrary to what most people believe, Audio Manufacturers actually have noticed that there is another segment of consumers that use their products.
You bring up some good points.
I actually first saw thunderbolt on an HP. Not trying to start a PC vs Mac war, I appreciate them both, but if you're doing production or DJing, it's waaaaaaaay less of a headache on a mac. Like a said, the pro level audio interfaces use thunderbolt and there's a good reason for that.
Rebelguy
8:48 PM - 22 January, 2015
Are we not seeing USB 3.0 these days? this thing will be already outdated in 12 months.
USB 2.0 has no problem handling up to 24 channels of audio and has a wider user base. Also...can you name any company that has released an audio interface using USB 3.0.
He doesn't understand usb 2.0-3.0. To him it's just a higher number and doesn't understand how audio works. You're right, there are no usb 3.0 interfaces. Most if anything, went thunderbolt to free up ports. Also the pro ones like universal audio will have dual thunderbolt for daisy chaining.
While he may not have formulated his argument correctly, his question should not be dismissed. So there aren't a high number of USB 3.0 interfaces right now. That doesn't mean that it's not a viable path to take.
USB 3.0 offers several advantages over USB 2.0 that I think manufacturers should take a serious look at. As an example, USB 3.0 has eliminated polling, and replaced it with asynchronous timing. USB 3.0 increases the allotted power specification for devices.
While there are several other improvements (some obvious, such as the increased bandwidth capacities), the biggest one here that will probably affect audio manufacturers is that USB 3.0 is FULL Duplex (as opposed to USB 2.0 having been half-duplex).
The other problem you're faced with, in terms of Thunderbolt, is adoption. Despite being an Intel technology, Thunderbolt does not appear on most Intel devices outside of the Apple space; and contrary to what most people believe, Audio Manufacturers actually have noticed that there is another segment of consumers that use their products.
At this present time there are manufacturers like RME doing Amazon things with USB 2.0. I'm not knocking your comment but USB 2.0 is more established, has a wider user base and is more than sufficient for what these mixers require.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
"The new TTM57 MK2 keeps the same design as the original, adding a set of dual USB 2.0 audio/MIDI ports"Are we not seeing USB 3.0 these days? this thing will be already outdated in 12 months.
USB 2.0 has no problem handling up to 24 channels of audio and has a wider user base. Also...can you name any company that has released an audio interface using USB 3.0.
He doesn't understand usb 2.0-3.0. To him it's just a higher number and doesn't understand how audio works. You're right, there are no usb 3.0 interfaces. Most if anything, went thunderbolt to free up ports. Also the pro ones like universal audio will have dual thunderbolt for daisy chaining.
While he may not have formulated his argument correctly, his question should not be dismissed. So there aren't a high number of USB 3.0 interfaces right now. That doesn't mean that it's not a viable path to take.
USB 3.0 offers several advantages over USB 2.0 that I think manufacturers should take a serious look at. As an example, USB 3.0 has eliminated polling, and replaced it with asynchronous timing. USB 3.0 increases the allotted power specification for devices.
While there are several other improvements (some obvious, such as the increased bandwidth capacities), the biggest one here that will probably affect audio manufacturers is that USB 3.0 is FULL Duplex (as opposed to USB 2.0 having been half-duplex).
The other problem you're faced with, in terms of Thunderbolt, is adoption. Despite being an Intel technology, Thunderbolt does not appear on most Intel devices outside of the Apple space; and contrary to what most people believe, Audio Manufacturers actually have noticed that there is another segment of consumers that use their products.
At this present time there are manufacturers like RME doing Amazon things with USB 2.0. I'm not knocking your comment but USB 2.0 is more established, has a wider user base and is more than sufficient for what these mixers require.
Papa Midnight
9:20 PM - 22 January, 2015
Are we not seeing USB 3.0 these days? this thing will be already outdated in 12 months.
USB 2.0 has no problem handling up to 24 channels of audio and has a wider user base. Also...can you name any company that has released an audio interface using USB 3.0.
He doesn't understand usb 2.0-3.0. To him it's just a higher number and doesn't understand how audio works. You're right, there are no usb 3.0 interfaces. Most if anything, went thunderbolt to free up ports. Also the pro ones like universal audio will have dual thunderbolt for daisy chaining.
While he may not have formulated his argument correctly, his question should not be dismissed. So there aren't a high number of USB 3.0 interfaces right now. That doesn't mean that it's not a viable path to take.
USB 3.0 offers several advantages over USB 2.0 that I think manufacturers should take a serious look at. As an example, USB 3.0 has eliminated polling, and replaced it with asynchronous timing. USB 3.0 increases the allotted power specification for devices.
While there are several other improvements (some obvious, such as the increased bandwidth capacities), the biggest one here that will probably affect audio manufacturers is that USB 3.0 is FULL Duplex (as opposed to USB 2.0 having been half-duplex).
The other problem you're faced with, in terms of Thunderbolt, is adoption. Despite being an Intel technology, Thunderbolt does not appear on most Intel devices outside of the Apple space; and contrary to what most people believe, Audio Manufacturers actually have noticed that there is another segment of consumers that use their products.
You bring up some good points.
I actually first saw thunderbolt on an HP. Not trying to start a PC vs Mac war, I appreciate them both, but if you're doing production or DJing, it's waaaaaaaay less of a headache on a mac. Like a said, the pro level audio interfaces use thunderbolt and there's a good reason for that.
You'll get no argument from me there. I have my thoughts on why this is the case, but those have been explored in other threads before, and this is not the time for that.
Indeed, USB 2.0 does have a very wide userbase. However, USB 3.0 is also backwards compatible with USB 2.0 - granted, that may present some difficulties to the manufacturer.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
"The new TTM57 MK2 keeps the same design as the original, adding a set of dual USB 2.0 audio/MIDI ports"Are we not seeing USB 3.0 these days? this thing will be already outdated in 12 months.
USB 2.0 has no problem handling up to 24 channels of audio and has a wider user base. Also...can you name any company that has released an audio interface using USB 3.0.
He doesn't understand usb 2.0-3.0. To him it's just a higher number and doesn't understand how audio works. You're right, there are no usb 3.0 interfaces. Most if anything, went thunderbolt to free up ports. Also the pro ones like universal audio will have dual thunderbolt for daisy chaining.
While he may not have formulated his argument correctly, his question should not be dismissed. So there aren't a high number of USB 3.0 interfaces right now. That doesn't mean that it's not a viable path to take.
USB 3.0 offers several advantages over USB 2.0 that I think manufacturers should take a serious look at. As an example, USB 3.0 has eliminated polling, and replaced it with asynchronous timing. USB 3.0 increases the allotted power specification for devices.
While there are several other improvements (some obvious, such as the increased bandwidth capacities), the biggest one here that will probably affect audio manufacturers is that USB 3.0 is FULL Duplex (as opposed to USB 2.0 having been half-duplex).
The other problem you're faced with, in terms of Thunderbolt, is adoption. Despite being an Intel technology, Thunderbolt does not appear on most Intel devices outside of the Apple space; and contrary to what most people believe, Audio Manufacturers actually have noticed that there is another segment of consumers that use their products.
You bring up some good points.
I actually first saw thunderbolt on an HP. Not trying to start a PC vs Mac war, I appreciate them both, but if you're doing production or DJing, it's waaaaaaaay less of a headache on a mac. Like a said, the pro level audio interfaces use thunderbolt and there's a good reason for that.
You'll get no argument from me there. I have my thoughts on why this is the case, but those have been explored in other threads before, and this is not the time for that.
Quote:
At this present time there are manufacturers like RME doing amazing things with USB 2.0. I'm not knocking your comment but USB 2.0 is more established, has a wider user base and is more than sufficient for what these mixers require.Indeed, USB 2.0 does have a very wide userbase. However, USB 3.0 is also backwards compatible with USB 2.0 - granted, that may present some difficulties to the manufacturer.
the SOUNDINSURGENT
9:29 PM - 22 January, 2015
It's about time other boxes are made for SDJ, RANE prices are just crazy!!
I welcome this!!
I welcome this!!
Gio Alex
10:00 PM - 22 January, 2015
Something tells me this Serao DJ club Kit will only be available for the mixers listed and ones to be released in the near future.
Something about the name 'Club Kit" though. Would be really nice if they supported other mixers though.
Something about the name 'Club Kit" though. Would be really nice if they supported other mixers though.
Djaward
10:06 PM - 22 January, 2015
I just recently purchased an SRT... Now Im left feeling like a jackass for buying it.
At least give the SRT owners a free CLUB KIT.
At least give the SRT owners a free CLUB KIT.
DJ Irv
10:09 PM - 22 January, 2015
At least give the SRT owners a free CLUB KIT.
I don't have an SRT but, totally agree with you here.
Quote:
I just recently purchased an SRT... Now Im left feeling like a jackass for buying it.At least give the SRT owners a free CLUB KIT.
I don't have an SRT but, totally agree with you here.
the SOUNDINSURGENT
10:10 PM - 22 January, 2015
They should just go ahead and open it up to ALL Pioneer mixers.......... Would really love to use my DJM T1 with the SL3.
nik39
10:13 PM - 22 January, 2015
4 phono inputs, LED colors, magnetic fader on the SRT that's about it. NONE of these justify the almost $2,000 this mixer cost me.
I remember when the SRT came out it was tough enough justifying the purchase of the SRT when you had the Nexus. Now.................. IMPOSSIBLE. There is NO justification. I got my Nexus for 1,150. The expansion costs what $100 at the most? Instead $2,000 on now what would be considered almost the same exact mixer!!!???!!??
deejaydave, how can you compare a used mixer price to a new mixer price?
MAP difference is about $400. That's $170 for the license, and the remaining $230 would be for the magnetic fader and the additional phono pre-amps. I don't think you are being ripped off. However.. I think Pio+Serato never really explained the price difference in a proper way and therefore I was surprised too when I heard that the 900SRT costs $400 more than the 900NXS.
Quote:
This would be a good selling point for someone who wanted to connect four TT's. I have six and have not connected any more than two in the past 5 years or so.4 phono inputs, LED colors, magnetic fader on the SRT that's about it. NONE of these justify the almost $2,000 this mixer cost me.
I remember when the SRT came out it was tough enough justifying the purchase of the SRT when you had the Nexus. Now.................. IMPOSSIBLE. There is NO justification. I got my Nexus for 1,150. The expansion costs what $100 at the most? Instead $2,000 on now what would be considered almost the same exact mixer!!!???!!??
deejaydave, how can you compare a used mixer price to a new mixer price?
MAP difference is about $400. That's $170 for the license, and the remaining $230 would be for the magnetic fader and the additional phono pre-amps. I don't think you are being ripped off. However.. I think Pio+Serato never really explained the price difference in a proper way and therefore I was surprised too when I heard that the 900SRT costs $400 more than the 900NXS.
nik39
10:14 PM - 22 January, 2015
A question to Serato+Pioneer:
How comes that the 900NXS, the 850 are supported, but not the 750? Are there technical reasons for that?
How comes that the 900NXS, the 850 are supported, but not the 750? Are there technical reasons for that?
nik39
10:15 PM - 22 January, 2015
But are those joysticks?
Any comments on the missing VU meter?
They aren't missing. They are there.
Okay, on the pictures it looks like there aren't any channel LEDs.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Why no channel LEDs?But are those joysticks?
Any comments on the missing VU meter?
They aren't missing. They are there.
Okay, on the pictures it looks like there aren't any channel LEDs.
nik39
10:17 PM - 22 January, 2015
But are those joysticks?
Any comments on the missing VU meter?
They aren't missing. They are there.
Okay, on the pictures it looks like there aren't any channel LEDs.
Doh! They have been moved to the top! This is a change compared to the original 57.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Why no channel LEDs?But are those joysticks?
Any comments on the missing VU meter?
They aren't missing. They are there.
Okay, on the pictures it looks like there aren't any channel LEDs.
Doh! They have been moved to the top! This is a change compared to the original 57.
deejdave
10:33 PM - 22 January, 2015
4 phono inputs, LED colors, magnetic fader on the SRT that's about it. NONE of these justify the almost $2,000 this mixer cost me.
I remember when the SRT came out it was tough enough justifying the purchase of the SRT when you had the Nexus. Now.................. IMPOSSIBLE. There is NO justification. I got my Nexus for 1,150. The expansion costs what $100 at the most? Instead $2,000 on now what would be considered almost the same exact mixer!!!???!!??
deejaydave, how can you compare a used mixer price to a new mixer price?
MAP difference is about $400. That's $170 for the license, and the remaining $230 would be for the magnetic fader and the additional phono pre-amps. I don't think you are being ripped off. However.. I think Pio+Serato never really explained the price difference in a proper way and therefore I was surprised too when I heard that the 900SRT costs $400 more than the 900NXS.
I am not comparing to any dude off the streets. I am saying what my scenario was. As a whole this seems like a great move but IMO there just should have never been an SRT is all I am saying.
The 900Nexus was cheaper for me and especially being that now the 900Nexus is actually the more flexible mixer this is a huge burn.
900Nexus you get Serato DJ, Rekordbox AND Traktor Scratch support with no hacks or anything as all three are officially supported now.
900SRT you get Serato DJ, Rekordbox but only Traktor Pro2 with no DVS.
Quote:
Quote:
This would be a good selling point for someone who wanted to connect four TT's. I have six and have not connected any more than two in the past 5 years or so.4 phono inputs, LED colors, magnetic fader on the SRT that's about it. NONE of these justify the almost $2,000 this mixer cost me.
I remember when the SRT came out it was tough enough justifying the purchase of the SRT when you had the Nexus. Now.................. IMPOSSIBLE. There is NO justification. I got my Nexus for 1,150. The expansion costs what $100 at the most? Instead $2,000 on now what would be considered almost the same exact mixer!!!???!!??
deejaydave, how can you compare a used mixer price to a new mixer price?
MAP difference is about $400. That's $170 for the license, and the remaining $230 would be for the magnetic fader and the additional phono pre-amps. I don't think you are being ripped off. However.. I think Pio+Serato never really explained the price difference in a proper way and therefore I was surprised too when I heard that the 900SRT costs $400 more than the 900NXS.
I am not comparing to any dude off the streets. I am saying what my scenario was. As a whole this seems like a great move but IMO there just should have never been an SRT is all I am saying.
The 900Nexus was cheaper for me and especially being that now the 900Nexus is actually the more flexible mixer this is a huge burn.
900Nexus you get Serato DJ, Rekordbox AND Traktor Scratch support with no hacks or anything as all three are officially supported now.
900SRT you get Serato DJ, Rekordbox but only Traktor Pro2 with no DVS.
Gio Alex
10:56 PM - 22 January, 2015
4 phono inputs, LED colors, magnetic fader on the SRT that's about it. NONE of these justify the almost $2,000 this mixer cost me.
I remember when the SRT came out it was tough enough justifying the purchase of the SRT when you had the Nexus. Now.................. IMPOSSIBLE. There is NO justification. I got my Nexus for 1,150. The expansion costs what $100 at the most? Instead $2,000 on now what would be considered almost the same exact mixer!!!???!!??
deejaydave, how can you compare a used mixer price to a new mixer price?
MAP difference is about $400. That's $170 for the license, and the remaining $230 would be for the magnetic fader and the additional phono pre-amps. I don't think you are being ripped off. However.. I think Pio+Serato never really explained the price difference in a proper way and therefore I was surprised too when I heard that the 900SRT costs $400 more than the 900NXS.
I am not comparing to any dude off the streets. I am saying what my scenario was. As a whole this seems like a great move but IMO there just should have never been an SRT is all I am saying.
The 900Nexus was cheaper for me and especially being that now the 900Nexus is actually the more flexible mixer this is a huge burn.
900Nexus you get Serato DJ, Rekordbox AND Traktor Scratch support with no hacks or anything as all three are officially supported now.
900SRT you get Serato DJ, Rekordbox but only Traktor Pro2 with no DVS.
That's pretty effed up. Didn't realize the 900NXS was a traktor certified mixer.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
This would be a good selling point for someone who wanted to connect four TT's. I have six and have not connected any more than two in the past 5 years or so.4 phono inputs, LED colors, magnetic fader on the SRT that's about it. NONE of these justify the almost $2,000 this mixer cost me.
I remember when the SRT came out it was tough enough justifying the purchase of the SRT when you had the Nexus. Now.................. IMPOSSIBLE. There is NO justification. I got my Nexus for 1,150. The expansion costs what $100 at the most? Instead $2,000 on now what would be considered almost the same exact mixer!!!???!!??
deejaydave, how can you compare a used mixer price to a new mixer price?
MAP difference is about $400. That's $170 for the license, and the remaining $230 would be for the magnetic fader and the additional phono pre-amps. I don't think you are being ripped off. However.. I think Pio+Serato never really explained the price difference in a proper way and therefore I was surprised too when I heard that the 900SRT costs $400 more than the 900NXS.
I am not comparing to any dude off the streets. I am saying what my scenario was. As a whole this seems like a great move but IMO there just should have never been an SRT is all I am saying.
The 900Nexus was cheaper for me and especially being that now the 900Nexus is actually the more flexible mixer this is a huge burn.
900Nexus you get Serato DJ, Rekordbox AND Traktor Scratch support with no hacks or anything as all three are officially supported now.
900SRT you get Serato DJ, Rekordbox but only Traktor Pro2 with no DVS.
That's pretty effed up. Didn't realize the 900NXS was a traktor certified mixer.
deejdave
10:58 PM - 22 January, 2015
Oh yeah. And even though you CAN use the SRT natively with TP2 it is in fact NOT a Traktor Certified Mixer. This means the Nexus is certified on all three major DJ platforms now......... YAY!! LOL.
Quote:
That's pretty effed up. Didn't realize the 900NXS was a traktor certified mixer.Oh yeah. And even though you CAN use the SRT natively with TP2 it is in fact NOT a Traktor Certified Mixer. This means the Nexus is certified on all three major DJ platforms now......... YAY!! LOL.
Gio Alex
11:16 PM - 22 January, 2015
Oh yeah. And even though you CAN use the SRT natively with TP2 it is in fact NOT a Traktor Certified Mixer. This means the Nexus is certified on all three major DJ platforms now......... YAY!! LOL.
Man, if that DJM-T1 can get that Serato DJ Club (Highly doubt it) I can get that TP2 scratch and SDJ action too, without an SL box.
One of the reasons I Still use the 57SL is for road gigs where I don't feel like bringing a box or extra cables.
Quote:
Quote:
That's pretty effed up. Didn't realize the 900NXS was a traktor certified mixer.Oh yeah. And even though you CAN use the SRT natively with TP2 it is in fact NOT a Traktor Certified Mixer. This means the Nexus is certified on all three major DJ platforms now......... YAY!! LOL.
One of the reasons I Still use the 57SL is for road gigs where I don't feel like bringing a box or extra cables.
Djaward
12:48 AM - 23 January, 2015
So should I return the SRT and exchange for a NEXUS?
Im still within my 30 days.
Im still within my 30 days.
Samuel S
12:52 AM - 23 January, 2015
The DJM-900SRT also has other benefits, it's got tempo synced FX and fader start, which the 850/900NXS don't.
It's also got 4 phono inputs, magnetic (MAGVEL) crossfader and is supported as a plug-and-play Serato DJ device - requiring no additional license.
It's a great mixer.
Sam.
It's also got 4 phono inputs, magnetic (MAGVEL) crossfader and is supported as a plug-and-play Serato DJ device - requiring no additional license.
It's a great mixer.
Sam.
Certified Quality Entertainment
1:20 AM - 23 January, 2015
Would have liked to see a rane controller or a better higher end one from Denon. Oh well. Nothing new for me this year.
57mk2 does look dope tho!!
57mk2 does look dope tho!!
SpareChange
4:41 AM - 23 January, 2015
I hope the switches respond like the ones on the original 57 (which were perfect) not the ones on the 61 (which was the most disappointing part of that mixer to me) though they look like the ones on the 61
TelosHedge
5:18 AM - 23 January, 2015
directed straight at djdave: remember me? i was the one whining about this 2 years ago when the srt came out. actually i was whining about this whole srt thing and the no cdj 900 hid support (which has been added, thank you very much). i dont mean to say i told ya so, but i'm sort of glad somebody else is feeling my anger towards this whole industry now.
it's all just software. the rest is pretty lights and marketing. look at your 'new' 57 mk2, ns7III, denon serato box - there are no massive changes here. a second usb port? a screen (that was on an older model i hear?)? a serato box thats the size of your phone? (isn't it cool to have a phone thats bigger now?)
it's just history repeating itself. it's just another sx to an sx2. a scratch live to a serato dj. an iphone 5 to an iphone 6.
im starting to feel like the smartest guys in this game are the ones who bought their techs 20+ years ago and left it at that. my god, i envy you. dave it's clear to me now: we've all gotta draw our own lines and stay behind them. i'm sorry you got burned (and you did get burned), along with all the others that feel this way. i've been there, and while i never owned an srt, i'm not gonna be the one jumping for joy so i can pretend someone did me a favor by making my nexus do what i knew it could do all along.
it's all just software. the rest is pretty lights and marketing. look at your 'new' 57 mk2, ns7III, denon serato box - there are no massive changes here. a second usb port? a screen (that was on an older model i hear?)? a serato box thats the size of your phone? (isn't it cool to have a phone thats bigger now?)
it's just history repeating itself. it's just another sx to an sx2. a scratch live to a serato dj. an iphone 5 to an iphone 6.
im starting to feel like the smartest guys in this game are the ones who bought their techs 20+ years ago and left it at that. my god, i envy you. dave it's clear to me now: we've all gotta draw our own lines and stay behind them. i'm sorry you got burned (and you did get burned), along with all the others that feel this way. i've been there, and while i never owned an srt, i'm not gonna be the one jumping for joy so i can pretend someone did me a favor by making my nexus do what i knew it could do all along.
deejdave
6:24 AM - 23 January, 2015
I do remember. I even brought this up earlier. You too can vouch that I have ALWAYS been one of the biggest supporters for Serato in everything they do and every decision they make. Even when it does not make all that much sense. I always thought to myself there MUST be a reason...................
What happened today was a tough pill to swallow and I for once found myself doubting everything I have thought to be true about a few things.
It is what it is. I can not change the past and can only learn from it and change my aspect for the future.
Quote:
directed straight at djdave: remember me? i was the one whining about this 2 years ago when the srt came out. actually i was whining about this whole srt thing and the no cdj 900 hid support (which has been added, thank you very much). i dont mean to say i told ya so, but i'm sort of glad somebody else is feeling my anger towards this whole industry now.I do remember. I even brought this up earlier. You too can vouch that I have ALWAYS been one of the biggest supporters for Serato in everything they do and every decision they make. Even when it does not make all that much sense. I always thought to myself there MUST be a reason...................
What happened today was a tough pill to swallow and I for once found myself doubting everything I have thought to be true about a few things.
It is what it is. I can not change the past and can only learn from it and change my aspect for the future.
TelosHedge
6:28 AM - 23 January, 2015
you've always been a pretty optimistic and open minded person towards almost every corner of discussion we've had. seeing a guy like you get mad over something like this hits me harder than normal because of how open minded you usually are.
welcome to the dark side, where new christmas lights don't change the way we look at the same old tree anymore :)
Quote:
You too can vouch that I have ALWAYS been one of the biggest supporters for Serato in everything they do and every decision they make.you've always been a pretty optimistic and open minded person towards almost every corner of discussion we've had. seeing a guy like you get mad over something like this hits me harder than normal because of how open minded you usually are.
welcome to the dark side, where new christmas lights don't change the way we look at the same old tree anymore :)
deejdave
6:48 AM - 23 January, 2015
you've always been a pretty optimistic and open minded person towards almost every corner of discussion we've had. seeing a guy like you get mad over something like this hits me harder than normal because of how open minded you usually are.
welcome to the dark side, where new christmas lights don't change the way we look at the same old tree anymore :)
LOL.
Quote:
Quote:
You too can vouch that I have ALWAYS been one of the biggest supporters for Serato in everything they do and every decision they make.you've always been a pretty optimistic and open minded person towards almost every corner of discussion we've had. seeing a guy like you get mad over something like this hits me harder than normal because of how open minded you usually are.
welcome to the dark side, where new christmas lights don't change the way we look at the same old tree anymore :)
LOL.
dj_soo
6:48 AM - 23 January, 2015
from Sam S in the blog post:
They are also built by hand in the good old USA and are of a very high quality.
The Denon DS1 is also very high quality though, but has other differences that set it apart such as 96kHz sample rate support and a very small size!
Sam.
Quote:
The main differences will probably be build quality and sound quality.from Sam S in the blog post:
Quote:
There are definitely reasons the Rane SL 2 is the price that it is. One of them is Rane's unique galvanic isolation, which gives these units a super low signal/noise ratio.They are also built by hand in the good old USA and are of a very high quality.
The Denon DS1 is also very high quality though, but has other differences that set it apart such as 96kHz sample rate support and a very small size!
Sam.
dj_soo
6:56 AM - 23 January, 2015
if anyone didn't see the DJ tech game going to the way of modern electronics and yearly, incremental upgrades years ago, I'm not sure what you were paying attention to.
Same shit is going to happen next year, a bunch of slightly better stuff with maybe one, must-have (or at least people believing they must have it) feature, a slightly better controller or mixer, something slightly cheaper or whatever. Wash, rinse, repeat.
I have no doubt there's a list of features all these companies are purposely delaying in order to rollout a slightly improved version next year. If you're into the updates, you might stick to a 3 year product cycle if you're lucky. If not, be prepared to be pissed at "missing out" on something every year.
Writing has been on the wall for a long time - the days of getting techs and being set for the foreseeable future are long gone.
This is it, the new reality. Find something that fits your style as much as possible and get the best quality you can instead of trying to chase the latest features and you'll probably be happier.
Same shit is going to happen next year, a bunch of slightly better stuff with maybe one, must-have (or at least people believing they must have it) feature, a slightly better controller or mixer, something slightly cheaper or whatever. Wash, rinse, repeat.
I have no doubt there's a list of features all these companies are purposely delaying in order to rollout a slightly improved version next year. If you're into the updates, you might stick to a 3 year product cycle if you're lucky. If not, be prepared to be pissed at "missing out" on something every year.
Writing has been on the wall for a long time - the days of getting techs and being set for the foreseeable future are long gone.
This is it, the new reality. Find something that fits your style as much as possible and get the best quality you can instead of trying to chase the latest features and you'll probably be happier.
djsmuve415
7:19 AM - 23 January, 2015
Been saying this for a minute myself... seeing TOO many dudes in here and around me just wasting money on bullshit. be it for whatever reasons - to brag on FoolTube, to brag among their friends, or they're just gear whores in general. wasted cash. SMH
Quote:
Writing has been on the wall for a long time - the days of getting techs and being set for the foreseeable future are long gone..Been saying this for a minute myself... seeing TOO many dudes in here and around me just wasting money on bullshit. be it for whatever reasons - to brag on FoolTube, to brag among their friends, or they're just gear whores in general. wasted cash. SMH
DJ Irv
1:23 PM - 23 January, 2015
My opinion about the club kit is that if it let me use Serato DJ on the Z2 for $170 I would be using it and so would a lot of other DJ's.
Now that we know the 'Magic Serato Fairy Dust' that makes Serato DJ work with mixers is strait bullsh!t, Serato will have to come up with other excuses on why the Club Kit doesn't work on any mixer with a USB soundcard.
Now that we know the 'Magic Serato Fairy Dust' that makes Serato DJ work with mixers is strait bullsh!t, Serato will have to come up with other excuses on why the Club Kit doesn't work on any mixer with a USB soundcard.
blackavenger
1:28 PM - 23 January, 2015
You already know the answer to that.......... "LICENSING"!!
Quote:
Serato will have to come up with other excuses on why the Club Kit doesn't work on any mixer with a USB soundcard.You already know the answer to that.......... "LICENSING"!!
blackavenger
2:29 PM - 23 January, 2015
At first I was like, "What's the difference"?
Then I saw it, and laughed!
No pitch or line faders.
Then I saw it, and laughed!
No pitch or line faders.
deejdave
2:33 PM - 23 January, 2015
In all fairness he should have gotten rid of the crossfader. At least meatheads know to use the line faders only. How they gonna "throw" up their banger?
Davideon
3:05 PM - 23 January, 2015
Then I saw it, and laughed!
No pitch or line faders.
surely more apt for hip hop?
Quote:
At first I was like, "What's the difference"?Then I saw it, and laughed!
No pitch or line faders.
deejdave
3:11 PM - 23 January, 2015
Then I saw it, and laughed!
No pitch or line faders.
surely more apt for hip hop?
Exacry!! LOL
Quote:
Quote:
At first I was like, "What's the difference"?Then I saw it, and laughed!
No pitch or line faders.
Exacry!! LOL
Averix
3:18 PM - 23 January, 2015
All the hip hop djs I know use actual turntables, be kinda hard to sync hip hop beats since they are all around the place compared to the EDM standard BPM 128 now and days.
Controller djs be like "That's not funny"!
Controller djs be like "That's not funny"!
Papa Midnight
3:33 PM - 23 January, 2015
Controller djs be like "That's not funny"!
Surely you couldn't have been remotely close to serious when you made this post.
Quote:
All the hip hop djs I know use actual turntables, be kinda hard to sync hip hop beats since they are all around the place compared to the EDM standard BPM 128 now and days.Controller djs be like "That's not funny"!
Surely you couldn't have been remotely close to serious when you made this post.
Averix
3:37 PM - 23 January, 2015
Controller djs be like "That's not funny"!
Surely you couldn't have been remotely close to serious when you made this post.
Im just trying to be funny! Im not serious. =) Sorry man, don't mean to hurt your feelings...
Quote:
Quote:
All the hip hop djs I know use actual turntables, be kinda hard to sync hip hop beats since they are all around the place compared to the EDM standard BPM 128 now and days.Controller djs be like "That's not funny"!
Surely you couldn't have been remotely close to serious when you made this post.
Im just trying to be funny! Im not serious. =) Sorry man, don't mean to hurt your feelings...
deejdave
3:57 PM - 23 January, 2015
We all joking up in here!! No harm no foul :)
There are good EDM (although I hate the acronym it is the easiest way to describe) DJ's and I try to be one of them. No denying when you have a good hip-hop DJ they are usually as good as it gets and KNOW there way around a TT. It does NOT happen often but when a DJ knows how to scratch it is like a sweet serenade from the heavens. When a DJ THINKS he knows how to scratch and does NOT it is worse than a bad EDM DJ though too IMO.
There are good EDM (although I hate the acronym it is the easiest way to describe) DJ's and I try to be one of them. No denying when you have a good hip-hop DJ they are usually as good as it gets and KNOW there way around a TT. It does NOT happen often but when a DJ knows how to scratch it is like a sweet serenade from the heavens. When a DJ THINKS he knows how to scratch and does NOT it is worse than a bad EDM DJ though too IMO.
blackavenger
4:41 PM - 23 January, 2015
I am a controller DJ now, and I thought it was funny. Then again, I am NOT uptight about the controller vs. TT debate.
Quote:
Controller djs be like "That's not funny"!I am a controller DJ now, and I thought it was funny. Then again, I am NOT uptight about the controller vs. TT debate.
the SOUNDINSURGENT
4:42 PM - 23 January, 2015
You already know the answer to that.......... "LICENSING"!!
I find that hard to believe. Let's take VDJ for example, they can use ALMOST ANY soundcard on the planet!! Your trying to tell me that they are paying all these companies to be able to do that?? GTFOHWT, Serato is just fucking us!!
After this bullshit with the 900nxs proves they don't give a shit!!
Quote:
Quote:
Serato will have to come up with other excuses on why the Club Kit doesn't work on any mixer with a USB soundcard.You already know the answer to that.......... "LICENSING"!!
I find that hard to believe. Let's take VDJ for example, they can use ALMOST ANY soundcard on the planet!! Your trying to tell me that they are paying all these companies to be able to do that?? GTFOHWT, Serato is just fucking us!!
After this bullshit with the 900nxs proves they don't give a shit!!
blackavenger
4:44 PM - 23 January, 2015
That's sort of what I am saying.....Serato wants that licensing fee.
blackavenger
4:45 PM - 23 January, 2015
Oh, okay, I understand where you're coming from now. Disregard last post.
woody008
5:15 PM - 23 January, 2015
Looking back at historical discount numbers for the most recent Rane mixers I think it would be fair to say that you may be able to get a sweet deal on the 57MKII if you are patient and look hard enough.
Gio Alex
5:20 PM - 23 January, 2015
What's really unfortunate here is that the rane 61 was actually a pretty damn good looking mixers. If only they had added a few more midi/cue buttons own there plus the original 57 ins/outs there wouldn't be a need for the 57MK2. It could've been a 57MK2 by default.
I would gladly take a 57MK2 without the extra usb for the same price of the 61.
I would gladly take a 57MK2 without the extra usb for the same price of the 61.
deejdave
5:25 PM - 23 January, 2015
I'm thinking $1650 but I would LOVE to see your numbers instead ha
Quote:
$1550 - $1600 and $2600 to $2700 with discount. Maybe.I'm thinking $1650 but I would LOVE to see your numbers instead ha
woody008
5:29 PM - 23 January, 2015
I'm thinking $1650 but I would LOVE to see your numbers instead ha
$1575 and $2600 pre-order.
Quote:
Quote:
$1550 - $1600 and $2600 to $2700 with discount. Maybe.I'm thinking $1650 but I would LOVE to see your numbers instead ha
$1575 and $2600 pre-order.
deejdave
5:30 PM - 23 January, 2015
I'm thinking $1650 but I would LOVE to see your numbers instead ha
$1575 and $2600 pre-order.
Confirmed? or guess?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
$1550 - $1600 and $2600 to $2700 with discount. Maybe.I'm thinking $1650 but I would LOVE to see your numbers instead ha
$1575 and $2600 pre-order.
Confirmed? or guess?
Gio Alex
5:33 PM - 23 January, 2015
ha ha ha.
LOL and SL2s. You should see what the used rane mixers go for now. It's ridiculous. Especially on guitar center.
Quote:
Quote:
Buncha Rane 61s popping up on craigslist lol.ha ha ha.
LOL and SL2s. You should see what the used rane mixers go for now. It's ridiculous. Especially on guitar center.
Averix
5:34 PM - 23 January, 2015
Question: Is it necessary to upgrade your mixer? Or is it just a preference to get new gear all the time…
I know a dj who is rocking an old school 19" numark mixer and a couple of turntables, but producing better mixes compared to djs with newer equipment.
Just thinking out loud
I know a dj who is rocking an old school 19" numark mixer and a couple of turntables, but producing better mixes compared to djs with newer equipment.
Just thinking out loud
deejdave
5:35 PM - 23 January, 2015
Nice. I wish my retailer still carried Rane as I like giving them the business. Oh well.
Quote:
Comfirmed for me and just about anyone else.Nice. I wish my retailer still carried Rane as I like giving them the business. Oh well.
Joee
5:38 PM - 23 January, 2015
I'm thinking $1650 but I would LOVE to see your numbers instead ha
$1575 and $2600 pre-order.
if those are agi dj prices expect to get them $200 cheaper
agi sold the 62 for $1,800 on preorder i payed $1,625 on preorder from another store
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
$1550 - $1600 and $2600 to $2700 with discount. Maybe.I'm thinking $1650 but I would LOVE to see your numbers instead ha
$1575 and $2600 pre-order.
if those are agi dj prices expect to get them $200 cheaper
agi sold the 62 for $1,800 on preorder i payed $1,625 on preorder from another store
Gio Alex
5:39 PM - 23 January, 2015
I know a dj who is rocking an old school 19" numark mixer and a couple of turntables, but producing better mixes compared to djs with newer equipment.
Just thinking out loud
It's not. I still use a 909 and 57SL with an SL3 with TTS, but I also have newer mixers that have midi capabilities so every 4-5 years I guess it's good to upgrade to adapt to new features.
Quote:
Question: Is it necessary to upgrade your mixer? Or is it just a preference to get new gear all the time…I know a dj who is rocking an old school 19" numark mixer and a couple of turntables, but producing better mixes compared to djs with newer equipment.
Just thinking out loud
It's not. I still use a 909 and 57SL with an SL3 with TTS, but I also have newer mixers that have midi capabilities so every 4-5 years I guess it's good to upgrade to adapt to new features.
woody008
5:41 PM - 23 January, 2015
ha ha ha.
LOL and SL2s. You should see what the used rane mixers go for now. It's ridiculous. Especially on guitar center.
This must be a regional thing. Here in LA the only Rane products that have lost value in recent time are the SL1 and the original 57. Everything else is holding steady value.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Buncha Rane 61s popping up on craigslist lol.ha ha ha.
LOL and SL2s. You should see what the used rane mixers go for now. It's ridiculous. Especially on guitar center.
This must be a regional thing. Here in LA the only Rane products that have lost value in recent time are the SL1 and the original 57. Everything else is holding steady value.
Rebelguy
5:44 PM - 23 January, 2015
I'm thinking $1650 but I would LOVE to see your numbers instead ha
$1575 and $2600 pre-order.
if those are agi dj prices expect to get them $200 cheaper
agi sold the 62 for $1,800 on preorder i payed $1,625 on preorder from another store
Tough call. If Rane catches wind of a dealer doing major price cuts then they could lose their ability to carry Rane products. Its happened in the past so if you are getting major hookups you may want to keep it on the low.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
$1550 - $1600 and $2600 to $2700 with discount. Maybe.I'm thinking $1650 but I would LOVE to see your numbers instead ha
$1575 and $2600 pre-order.
if those are agi dj prices expect to get them $200 cheaper
agi sold the 62 for $1,800 on preorder i payed $1,625 on preorder from another store
Tough call. If Rane catches wind of a dealer doing major price cuts then they could lose their ability to carry Rane products. Its happened in the past so if you are getting major hookups you may want to keep it on the low.
Gio Alex
5:45 PM - 23 January, 2015
ha ha ha.
LOL and SL2s. You should see what the used rane mixers go for now. It's ridiculous. Especially on guitar center.
This must be a regional thing. Here in LA the only Rane products that have lost value in recent time are the SL1 and the original 57. Everything else is holding steady value.
Definitely regional. I'm in NYC. 850 is the lowest I've seen on CL for 61, and 600+ on Guitar Center. But not sure what state that was in. 62s range from 1200-1650 depending on who's selling. Crazy.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Buncha Rane 61s popping up on craigslist lol.ha ha ha.
LOL and SL2s. You should see what the used rane mixers go for now. It's ridiculous. Especially on guitar center.
This must be a regional thing. Here in LA the only Rane products that have lost value in recent time are the SL1 and the original 57. Everything else is holding steady value.
Definitely regional. I'm in NYC. 850 is the lowest I've seen on CL for 61, and 600+ on Guitar Center. But not sure what state that was in. 62s range from 1200-1650 depending on who's selling. Crazy.
Gio Alex
5:46 PM - 23 January, 2015
I'm thinking $1650 but I would LOVE to see your numbers instead ha
$1575 and $2600 pre-order.
if those are agi dj prices expect to get them $200 cheaper
agi sold the 62 for $1,800 on preorder i payed $1,625 on preorder from another store
Tough call. If Rane catches wind of a dealer doing major price cuts then they could lose their ability to carry Rane products. Its happened in the past so if you are getting major hookups you may want to keep it on the low.
That's why retailers hide the price and do bargains offline, i.e. offer the phone or in person.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
$1550 - $1600 and $2600 to $2700 with discount. Maybe.I'm thinking $1650 but I would LOVE to see your numbers instead ha
$1575 and $2600 pre-order.
if those are agi dj prices expect to get them $200 cheaper
agi sold the 62 for $1,800 on preorder i payed $1,625 on preorder from another store
Tough call. If Rane catches wind of a dealer doing major price cuts then they could lose their ability to carry Rane products. Its happened in the past so if you are getting major hookups you may want to keep it on the low.
That's why retailers hide the price and do bargains offline, i.e. offer the phone or in person.
woody008
5:49 PM - 23 January, 2015
if those are agi dj prices expect to get them $200 cheaper
The second set of numbers ARE the "$200 cheaper".
Quote:
if those are agi dj prices expect to get them $200 cheaper
The second set of numbers ARE the "$200 cheaper".
Gio Alex
5:49 PM - 23 January, 2015
Hahaha word, I won't jinx the deals for other people. Noted.
Let's refrain from continuing this convo before the make the MSRP the actual retail, or worse, we'll only be able to purchase the mixers directly from Rane or Serato. lol
Quote:
^Lets stop talking about this now please thank youHahaha word, I won't jinx the deals for other people. Noted.
Let's refrain from continuing this convo before the make the MSRP the actual retail, or worse, we'll only be able to purchase the mixers directly from Rane or Serato. lol
Joee
5:51 PM - 23 January, 2015
got you, a store other than agi
Quote:
The second set of numbers ARE the "$200 cheaper".got you, a store other than agi
woody008
5:53 PM - 23 January, 2015
Math is math, Numbers are numbers. Call your preffered retailer and ask them for you magic number.
woody008
5:54 PM - 23 January, 2015
got you, a store other than agi
See post above.
Quote:
Quote:
The second set of numbers ARE the "$200 cheaper".got you, a store other than agi
See post above.
Joee
5:59 PM - 23 January, 2015
Hahaha word, I won't jinx the deals for other people. Noted.
Let's refrain from continuing this convo before the make the MSRP the actual retail, or worse, we'll only be able to purchase the mixers directly from Rane or Serato. lol
thats not going to happen everyone always wants to know where they can get the best price, my experience as great agi is there definitely not the best price around
Quote:
Quote:
^Lets stop talking about this now please thank youHahaha word, I won't jinx the deals for other people. Noted.
Let's refrain from continuing this convo before the make the MSRP the actual retail, or worse, we'll only be able to purchase the mixers directly from Rane or Serato. lol
thats not going to happen everyone always wants to know where they can get the best price, my experience as great agi is there definitely not the best price around
woody008
6:00 PM - 23 January, 2015
got you, a store other than agi
I haven't looked into it yet but maybe you can get similar numbers from Pro Audio Star (not that am recommending or endorsing them in any way).
Quote:
Quote:
The second set of numbers ARE the "$200 cheaper".got you, a store other than agi
I haven't looked into it yet but maybe you can get similar numbers from Pro Audio Star (not that am recommending or endorsing them in any way).
Gio Alex
6:06 PM - 23 January, 2015
They've been going for a steady 600-700 from what I've seen, but that's nothing new though. The most I've seen is 800-900, but that was when the 61/62/64 were released.
Quote:
So what will an original Rane 57 go for?They've been going for a steady 600-700 from what I've seen, but that's nothing new though. The most I've seen is 800-900, but that was when the 61/62/64 were released.
woody008
6:06 PM - 23 January, 2015
Hahaha word, I won't jinx the deals for other people. Noted.
Let's refrain from continuing this convo before the make the MSRP the actual retail, or worse, we'll only be able to purchase the mixers directly from Rane or Serato. lol
thats not going to happen everyone always wants to know where they can get the best price, my experience as great agi is there definitely not the best price around
AGI may not be the best price in town but remember; price, customer service, quality. Pick two.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
^Lets stop talking about this now please thank youHahaha word, I won't jinx the deals for other people. Noted.
Let's refrain from continuing this convo before the make the MSRP the actual retail, or worse, we'll only be able to purchase the mixers directly from Rane or Serato. lol
thats not going to happen everyone always wants to know where they can get the best price, my experience as great agi is there definitely not the best price around
AGI may not be the best price in town but remember; price, customer service, quality. Pick two.
Dj-M.Bezzle
6:09 PM - 23 January, 2015
Hahaha word, I won't jinx the deals for other people. Noted.
Let's refrain from continuing this convo before the make the MSRP the actual retail, or worse, we'll only be able to purchase the mixers directly from Rane or Serato. lol
thats not going to happen everyone always wants to know where they can get the best price, my experience as great agi is there definitely not the best price around
AGI may not be the best price in town but remember; price, customer service, quality. Pick two.
The answer is price and quality right
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
^Lets stop talking about this now please thank youHahaha word, I won't jinx the deals for other people. Noted.
Let's refrain from continuing this convo before the make the MSRP the actual retail, or worse, we'll only be able to purchase the mixers directly from Rane or Serato. lol
thats not going to happen everyone always wants to know where they can get the best price, my experience as great agi is there definitely not the best price around
AGI may not be the best price in town but remember; price, customer service, quality. Pick two.
The answer is price and quality right
woody008
6:14 PM - 23 January, 2015
"The answer is price and quality right "
Each person has their own prerogatives and I don't blame folks for looking for the best price they can find, but personally, I am done with bullshit companies that can't own up to their mistakes so I shop with outfits that don't fuck around even if I have to pay a little more.
Each person has their own prerogatives and I don't blame folks for looking for the best price they can find, but personally, I am done with bullshit companies that can't own up to their mistakes so I shop with outfits that don't fuck around even if I have to pay a little more.
Joee
6:18 PM - 23 January, 2015
i get all three from my vendor
but most important is price when you only buy here and there it may not be ,but when you buy like i do it is, example when the 62 came out i bought a total of 5 in less than a year
Quote:
AGI may not be the best price in town but remember; price, customer service, quality. Pick two.i get all three from my vendor
but most important is price when you only buy here and there it may not be ,but when you buy like i do it is, example when the 62 came out i bought a total of 5 in less than a year
woody008
6:23 PM - 23 January, 2015
i get all three from my vendor
Got it. I'd have to agree that it pays to have good relationships with your vendors and service suppliers. Its specially great when you bring them business in bulk.
Quote:
i get all three from my vendor
Got it. I'd have to agree that it pays to have good relationships with your vendors and service suppliers. Its specially great when you bring them business in bulk.
DJ Irv
6:26 PM - 23 January, 2015
Anyone else surprised to not see a new revised version of the Pioneer 909 with a built in dual USB soundcard?
Davideon
6:30 PM - 23 January, 2015
Controller djs be like "That's not funny"!
I've only ever heard EDM mentioned by Americans on dj forums. Never heard it anywhere in the UK. I'm guessing it's like electro house?
Would love to hear what it's meant to be if anyone can link to it.
Still don't see why people would suggest a pitch adjust isn't needed.
Quote:
All the hip hop djs I know use actual turntables, be kinda hard to sync hip hop beats since they are all around the place compared to the EDM standard BPM 128 now and days.Controller djs be like "That's not funny"!
I've only ever heard EDM mentioned by Americans on dj forums. Never heard it anywhere in the UK. I'm guessing it's like electro house?
Would love to hear what it's meant to be if anyone can link to it.
Still don't see why people would suggest a pitch adjust isn't needed.
skinnyguy
6:31 PM - 23 January, 2015
kinda tempting to get that club license and a djm850 now instead of a 900 or 900srt.
.....when i finally cross over to sdj.
i'll still probably get an sl2 for now just cuz of ssl.
.....when i finally cross over to sdj.
i'll still probably get an sl2 for now just cuz of ssl.
Gio Alex
6:33 PM - 23 January, 2015
Nope, the pioneer is in the edm (for lack of a better word) business. They kind of did that with the 900SRT. I don't see them making another 2 Channel mixer even if it's a battle scratch mixer. They'll wanna sell it for 1800 knowing them. Judging the current state of djing and products being released every day and newcomer DJs being cheap as hell, I doubt it'll sell as well as they would like it to.
Look at what happened to the DJM-T1. They introduced it for the same price as the 57SL as an F-You to serato, but Z2 came out and they had to drop price just to compete and then eventually discontinued it.
Quote:
Anyone else surprised to not see a new revised version of the Pioneer 909 with a built in dual USB soundcard?Nope, the pioneer is in the edm (for lack of a better word) business. They kind of did that with the 900SRT. I don't see them making another 2 Channel mixer even if it's a battle scratch mixer. They'll wanna sell it for 1800 knowing them. Judging the current state of djing and products being released every day and newcomer DJs being cheap as hell, I doubt it'll sell as well as they would like it to.
Look at what happened to the DJM-T1. They introduced it for the same price as the 57SL as an F-You to serato, but Z2 came out and they had to drop price just to compete and then eventually discontinued it.
woody008
6:47 PM - 23 January, 2015
Look at what happened to the DJM-T1. They introduced it for the same price as the 57SL as an F-You to serato, but Z2 came out and they had to drop price just to compete and then eventually discontinued it.
Yup. The DJM T1 is an awesome piece of equipment that went under supported software wise. Thats too bad, they could now relaunch a similar product (SDJ and Traktor certified) to compete with the 57MKII, sixty one and sixty two in the professional arena.
Quote:
Look at what happened to the DJM-T1. They introduced it for the same price as the 57SL as an F-You to serato, but Z2 came out and they had to drop price just to compete and then eventually discontinued it.
Yup. The DJM T1 is an awesome piece of equipment that went under supported software wise. Thats too bad, they could now relaunch a similar product (SDJ and Traktor certified) to compete with the 57MKII, sixty one and sixty two in the professional arena.
DJ Irv
6:51 PM - 23 January, 2015
Seems now the the Pioneer DJM 900NXS is the best mixer to have in your club. Serato DJ and Traktor no problem.
Gio Alex
6:51 PM - 23 January, 2015
Truth.
Quote:
Seems now the the Pioneer DJM 900NXS is the best mixer to have in your club. Serato DJ and Traktor no problem.Truth.
Gio Alex
6:55 PM - 23 January, 2015
Yup. The DJM T1 is an awesome piece of equipment that went under supported software wise. Thats too bad, they could now relaunch a similar product (SDJ and Traktor certified) to compete with the 57MKII, sixty one and sixty two in the professional arena.
It would make sense being that they released turntables. A nice battle mixer would be make a great companion, but Pioneer spends too much time making poorly calculated split decisions. They often times release products just for sales and hype then abandon them just as fast.
Quote:
Quote:
Look at what happened to the DJM-T1. They introduced it for the same price as the 57SL as an F-You to serato, but Z2 came out and they had to drop price just to compete and then eventually discontinued it.Yup. The DJM T1 is an awesome piece of equipment that went under supported software wise. Thats too bad, they could now relaunch a similar product (SDJ and Traktor certified) to compete with the 57MKII, sixty one and sixty two in the professional arena.
It would make sense being that they released turntables. A nice battle mixer would be make a great companion, but Pioneer spends too much time making poorly calculated split decisions. They often times release products just for sales and hype then abandon them just as fast.
Rebelguy
6:59 PM - 23 January, 2015
I have a feeling Rane might have a patent on the whold dual usb soundcard in a mixer thing. Has any other company come out with one?
Gio Alex
7:01 PM - 23 January, 2015
Very interesting. It's possible. Never looked at it that way.
Personally, on a dj level, not production, I feel the dual usb thing isn't all that big of a deal. You can switch out in so many other ways, that's the whole point behind it anyway. Does it really merit the several hundred dollars more it costs? Maybe. To me it doesn't.
Quote:
I have a feeling Rane might have a patent on the whold dual usb soundcard in a mixer thing. Has any other company come out with one?Very interesting. It's possible. Never looked at it that way.
Personally, on a dj level, not production, I feel the dual usb thing isn't all that big of a deal. You can switch out in so many other ways, that's the whole point behind it anyway. Does it really merit the several hundred dollars more it costs? Maybe. To me it doesn't.
the SOUNDINSURGENT
7:07 PM - 23 January, 2015
Yup. The DJM T1 is an awesome piece of equipment that went under supported software wise. Thats too bad, they could now relaunch a similar product (SDJ and Traktor certified) to compete with the 57MKII, sixty one and sixty two in the professional arena.
It would make sense being that they released turntables. A nice battle mixer would be make a great companion, but Pioneer spends too much time making poorly calculated split decisions. They often times release products just for sales and hype then abandon them just as fast.
Or Serato can just quit being dicks and give a us a price so I can use it as a soundcard with my tables........ Other then the lack of effects send/return this mixer is solid......
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Look at what happened to the DJM-T1. They introduced it for the same price as the 57SL as an F-You to serato, but Z2 came out and they had to drop price just to compete and then eventually discontinued it.Yup. The DJM T1 is an awesome piece of equipment that went under supported software wise. Thats too bad, they could now relaunch a similar product (SDJ and Traktor certified) to compete with the 57MKII, sixty one and sixty two in the professional arena.
It would make sense being that they released turntables. A nice battle mixer would be make a great companion, but Pioneer spends too much time making poorly calculated split decisions. They often times release products just for sales and hype then abandon them just as fast.
Or Serato can just quit being dicks and give a us a price so I can use it as a soundcard with my tables........ Other then the lack of effects send/return this mixer is solid......
Will08272
7:23 PM - 23 January, 2015
The SZ has two usb ports, its not a stand alone mixer but it is another dj product with dual soundcards.
Quote:
I have a feeling Rane might have a patent on the whold dual usb soundcard in a mixer thing. Has any other company come out with one?The SZ has two usb ports, its not a stand alone mixer but it is another dj product with dual soundcards.
Rebelguy
7:26 PM - 23 January, 2015
Interesting. I was not aware of this. Maybe it not being a standalone mixer bypasses any exclusivity issues.
Will08272
7:30 PM - 23 January, 2015
Not sure if anyone has had this perspective, but blame shouldnt be thrown at serato in the sense that the hardware manufacturers have more to gain from only certain products being marketed as made for serato. Virtual DJ and Mixvibes both work with any usb soundcard but nobody is lining up to make products "specifically" for those programs. Look at traktor before NI locked things down, several scratch certified mixers and a bunch of controllers bundled with traktor le. It could be that the hardware makers rather some software be sort of closed in order for them to better market and sell their products.
Will08272
7:33 PM - 23 January, 2015
Obviously the controllers can be mapped to any software, but to the average person buying the product they are going to use the software its being sold with or look soley at products that are serato made, because the name serato has become a sort of staple it makes it easier for X hardware maker to sell it to customers.
Davideon
7:40 PM - 23 January, 2015
I'd be amazed if you could patent that
Quote:
I have a feeling Rane might have a patent on the whold dual usb soundcard in a mixer thing. Has any other company come out with one?I'd be amazed if you could patent that
Rebelguy
8:03 PM - 23 January, 2015
Apple patented rounded corners on a rectangular device. Anything is possible.
boabmatic
10:11 PM - 23 January, 2015
Very interesting. It's possible. Never looked at it that way.
Personally, on a dj level, not production, I feel the dual usb thing isn't all that big of a deal. You can switch out in so many other ways, that's the whole point behind it anyway. Does it really merit the several hundred dollars more it costs? Maybe. To me it doesn't.
Yes it is worth the extra For the dual usb .. Having the dual in the 62 makes any switch stress free and also allows easy back to back mixing .
Do a lot of gig nights .. Where u are switching out and in between the bands DJ and support DJ's and couldn't go back to one USB anymore.
Quote:
Quote:
I have a feeling Rane might have a patent on the whold dual usb soundcard in a mixer thing. Has any other company come out with one?Very interesting. It's possible. Never looked at it that way.
Personally, on a dj level, not production, I feel the dual usb thing isn't all that big of a deal. You can switch out in so many other ways, that's the whole point behind it anyway. Does it really merit the several hundred dollars more it costs? Maybe. To me it doesn't.
Yes it is worth the extra For the dual usb .. Having the dual in the 62 makes any switch stress free and also allows easy back to back mixing .
Do a lot of gig nights .. Where u are switching out and in between the bands DJ and support DJ's and couldn't go back to one USB anymore.
Gio Alex
10:20 PM - 23 January, 2015
I get that, I do a lot of gigs. All I'm saying is I get for a club installation but for home use or normal gig use, it's not that serious. I just bring like 10 records and an iPod. Sometimes I bring a spare box.
But I hear you though.
But I hear you though.
deejdave
10:36 PM - 23 January, 2015
But I hear you though.
I am 100% with you. Not for nothing I own the Rane 64 and the (as if anyone doesn't know by now) SRT. The Rane 64 has dual USB but for personal use I have used for testing purposes ONLY as I have ZERO urge to share my personal mixer with others.................. have you seen what house gear looks like even after 2-3 months?
The Dual USB makes a ton of sense for club owners etc. but for personal use I can do with or without it.
Quote:
I get that, I do a lot of gigs. All I'm saying is I get for a club installation but for home use or normal gig use, it's not that serious. I just bring like 10 records and an iPod. Sometimes I bring a spare box.But I hear you though.
I am 100% with you. Not for nothing I own the Rane 64 and the (as if anyone doesn't know by now) SRT. The Rane 64 has dual USB but for personal use I have used for testing purposes ONLY as I have ZERO urge to share my personal mixer with others.................. have you seen what house gear looks like even after 2-3 months?
The Dual USB makes a ton of sense for club owners etc. but for personal use I can do with or without it.
Gio Alex
10:41 PM - 23 January, 2015
But I hear you though.
I am 100% with you. Not for nothing I own the Rane 64 and the (as if anyone doesn't know by now) SRT. The Rane 64 has dual USB but for personal use I have used for testing purposes ONLY as I have ZERO urge to share my personal mixer with others.................. have you seen what house gear looks like even after 2-3 months?
The Dual USB makes a ton of sense for club owners etc. but for personal use I can do with or without it.
OMG don't get me started on house gear. I'm fortunate enough that some spots I play at let me bring my own mixer. I don't even touch house mixers given the choice, it's so sad what these kids do to the gear at these venues.
Quote:
Quote:
I get that, I do a lot of gigs. All I'm saying is I get for a club installation but for home use or normal gig use, it's not that serious. I just bring like 10 records and an iPod. Sometimes I bring a spare box.But I hear you though.
I am 100% with you. Not for nothing I own the Rane 64 and the (as if anyone doesn't know by now) SRT. The Rane 64 has dual USB but for personal use I have used for testing purposes ONLY as I have ZERO urge to share my personal mixer with others.................. have you seen what house gear looks like even after 2-3 months?
The Dual USB makes a ton of sense for club owners etc. but for personal use I can do with or without it.
OMG don't get me started on house gear. I'm fortunate enough that some spots I play at let me bring my own mixer. I don't even touch house mixers given the choice, it's so sad what these kids do to the gear at these venues.
Joee
10:59 PM - 23 January, 2015
prices i have found with out haggling on the 57mk2 & rotary
$1540 and $2500
i suspect they can be had for a better price
$1540 and $2500
i suspect they can be had for a better price
Johnny.S
1:16 PM - 24 January, 2015
I don't know about you guys but I would love and Updated Rane Sixty Twoo droollll....
I never was fond of the 57?? I always preferred pioneer 909... or any pioneer mixer.
Please rane! an mK2 of the 62 already.. I want more pads and color on them :) :)
I never was fond of the 57?? I always preferred pioneer 909... or any pioneer mixer.
Please rane! an mK2 of the 62 already.. I want more pads and color on them :) :)
DJ dVO
4:09 PM - 24 January, 2015
Isn't that too soon for a 62 mk2?
I still don't understand why Rane hasn't entered the controller market. They would have made a huge splash, imho.
I still don't understand why Rane hasn't entered the controller market. They would have made a huge splash, imho.
blackavenger
4:58 PM - 24 January, 2015
Because they have ZERO experience with platters of any kind.
Hell, even their 1980's dot matrix display, and hard plastic buttons on the 62 are a joke.
I don't necessarily think that Rane would make a good controller. I'm sure the build quality and wiring would be top notch, but I think it would take several years before they got it right.
Quote:
I still don't understand why Rane hasn't entered the controller market.Because they have ZERO experience with platters of any kind.
Hell, even their 1980's dot matrix display, and hard plastic buttons on the 62 are a joke.
I don't necessarily think that Rane would make a good controller. I'm sure the build quality and wiring would be top notch, but I think it would take several years before they got it right.
deejdave
5:01 PM - 24 January, 2015
Exactly. THIS right here is make or break. Not for nothing even with their EXCELLENT track record with mixers I wouldn't trust one (without extensive testing and research) if they did make a controller. Platters are arguably the largest defining factor of a controller.
Again as per usual this is not something we have to worry about because the largest reason not to expect a controller from them is because they themselves have stated multiple times it will not be happening.
Quote:
Because they have ZERO experience with platters of any kind.Exactly. THIS right here is make or break. Not for nothing even with their EXCELLENT track record with mixers I wouldn't trust one (without extensive testing and research) if they did make a controller. Platters are arguably the largest defining factor of a controller.
Again as per usual this is not something we have to worry about because the largest reason not to expect a controller from them is because they themselves have stated multiple times it will not be happening.
Nick M
5:45 PM - 24 January, 2015
Rane doesn't have a patent, it's just quite hard to do and adds a lot of cost :)
Quote:
I have a feeling Rane might have a patent on the whold dual usb soundcard in a mixer thing. Has any other company come out with one?Rane doesn't have a patent, it's just quite hard to do and adds a lot of cost :)
djcrap
9:36 PM - 25 January, 2015
Rane doesn't have a patent, it's just quite hard to do and adds a lot of cost :)
Pioneer did the dual usb with the ddjsz
Quote:
Quote:
I have a feeling Rane might have a patent on the whold dual usb soundcard in a mixer thing. Has any other company come out with one?Rane doesn't have a patent, it's just quite hard to do and adds a lot of cost :)
Pioneer did the dual usb with the ddjsz
skinnyguy
5:59 PM - 26 January, 2015
pioneer overprices anyways. watch how much the price drops when they're getting ready to discontinue it.
djbigboy
6:08 PM - 26 January, 2015
NAMM was fun. The MP2015 mixer looked awesome in person! There were a lot of great products out there to look at. Pioneer booth was crazy. And the Denon serato box looked awesome. It's very small and because its cheaper than a regular serato box, I suspect more djs to make the leap...we shall see....
Gio Alex
6:10 PM - 26 January, 2015
Yup, lol like the DJM-T1 from 1,899 to what, like 599 i think?
Quote:
pioneer overprices anyways. watch how much the price drops when they're getting ready to discontinue it.Yup, lol like the DJM-T1 from 1,899 to what, like 599 i think?
DJ Remy USA
6:34 AM - 27 January, 2015
I want a updated Pio 909 that runs SDJ and traktor. I think the exclusive sound cards are going bye bye. I really want a new 909 with midi and shit....serato can you guys coerce them into this idea?
Asu
1:32 AM - 31 January, 2015
A Pioneer DJM-S1 with bigger cue RGB buttons/magnetic faders would be excellent along the PLX-1000 for $1499...that would sell quite well too
Quote:
I want a updated Pio 909 that runs SDJ and traktor. I think the exclusive sound cards are going bye bye. I really want a new 909 with midi and shit....serato can you guys coerce them into this idea?A Pioneer DJM-S1 with bigger cue RGB buttons/magnetic faders would be excellent along the PLX-1000 for $1499...that would sell quite well too
DJ GaFFle
5:29 PM - 1 February, 2015
I'm sure this comparison will be done when it hits the wild but what are the pro's and con's to the 57MKII if there are any? I'm asking in comparison to the 62. My intentions are to get the 57MKII.
Samuel S
6:42 PM - 1 February, 2015
Hey DJ GaFFle,
There's a few differences.
Firstly, the 57MKII brings the familiar workflow of the classic TTM-57SL mixer with updated features. The Serato DJ controls are laid out for easy access and controls such as the joysticks give you quick access to instant doubles as well as INT mode, Slip and censor. The pads are also updated from the Sixty-Two and are now vulcanised rubber.
The Sixty-Two has on-board hardware FX though, which the TTM57MKII does not. It's also got controls for 5 cue points rather than the 4 per deck which are available on the 57MKII.
There's a few differences.
Firstly, the 57MKII brings the familiar workflow of the classic TTM-57SL mixer with updated features. The Serato DJ controls are laid out for easy access and controls such as the joysticks give you quick access to instant doubles as well as INT mode, Slip and censor. The pads are also updated from the Sixty-Two and are now vulcanised rubber.
The Sixty-Two has on-board hardware FX though, which the TTM57MKII does not. It's also got controls for 5 cue points rather than the 4 per deck which are available on the 57MKII.
DJ GaFFle
8:31 PM - 1 February, 2015
Hmmm... I love the joystick aspect of the 57 but I didn't like toggling through button sections just to reach the EFX section, then having to reference the screen to see what effects I was dealing with. The problem is I've never used the 62 so I don't know how easy the effects are with it.
deejdave
2:19 AM - 2 February, 2015
I prefer my SP1 over my 64's built in FX layout etc. anyways as I am sure I will with the 57.........
DJFree
8:40 PM - 3 February, 2015
The Sixty Two was my first ever mixer because I just started a year ago and the effects are pretty easy to me. You're seasoned so I'm sure it'll be a breeze for you.
Quote:
Hmmm... I love the joystick aspect of the 57 but I didn't like toggling through button sections just to reach the EFX section, then having to reference the screen to see what effects I was dealing with. The problem is I've never used the 62 so I don't know how easy the effects are with it.The Sixty Two was my first ever mixer because I just started a year ago and the effects are pretty easy to me. You're seasoned so I'm sure it'll be a breeze for you.
Dj-M.Bezzle
9:24 PM - 3 February, 2015
Built in FX > software fx
Quote:
I prefer my SP1 over my 64's built in FX layout etc. anyways as I am sure I will with the 57.........Built in FX > software fx
deejdave
2:31 AM - 4 February, 2015
Built in FX > software fx
I agree with my SRT but not my 64. Don't shoot me it's just my opinion.
Quote:
Quote:
I prefer my SP1 over my 64's built in FX layout etc. anyways as I am sure I will with the 57.........Built in FX > software fx
I agree with my SRT but not my 64. Don't shoot me it's just my opinion.
blackavenger
3:46 AM - 4 February, 2015
Dave, you are considering a DB4......I assure you that you'll change your opinion on the SP-1 w' Isotope/Serato EFX if you end up getting it.
Quote:
I agree with my SRT but not my 64. Don't shoot me it's just my opinion.Dave, you are considering a DB4......I assure you that you'll change your opinion on the SP-1 w' Isotope/Serato EFX if you end up getting it.
deejdave
6:35 AM - 4 February, 2015
Not fully understanding (probably due to not having it yet) what you are saying. I have the SP1 now and fully dig it but are you saying I will like it more than the A&H FX engine or other way around? Don't get me wrong I dig the Izotope FX. I just am so used to Pioneer FX as well and the SRT's ONLY real win as of the club kits announcement is the beat synced hardware FX which apparently will remain exclusive to the SRT for now in regards to the other Pio & A&H mixers.
I have heard great stuff on the DB4's FX so I am hopeful it will be great as well.
I have heard great stuff on the DB4's FX so I am hopeful it will be great as well.
blackavenger
2:16 PM - 4 February, 2015
No, I was saying that you'll prefer the internal EFX of the DB4 to that of Isotope's EFX within Serato. Hell, they even blow away Pioneer's EFX. The DB4 is a BEAST!! The EFX sound so clean/natural that even the most trained ear can't even tell you are engaging them....they just think it's a part of the song.
deejdave
4:26 PM - 4 February, 2015
You just got me excited!!! I have yet to hear a bad thing on the DB4. Anything bad you can think of. Not trying to be a negative person I just like to be real.
deejdave
4:33 PM - 4 February, 2015
Also how will it stack against the SRT specifically regarding the beat quantized FX. Assuming the DB4 like all other mixers will not support tempo synced FX via the software.
Gio Alex
4:41 PM - 4 February, 2015
Not sure if this interests you, but there's a xone DB4 vs. 900NXS vid. I haven't watched it yet though.
Watchwww.youtube.com
Quote:
Also how will it stack against the SRT specifically regarding the beat quantized FX. Assuming the DB4 like all other mixers will not support tempo synced FX via the software.Not sure if this interests you, but there's a xone DB4 vs. 900NXS vid. I haven't watched it yet though.
Watchwww.youtube.com
Gio Alex
4:43 PM - 4 February, 2015
Never mind, this shit ain't even in english lmao and no subs.
Quote:
Also how will it stack against the SRT specifically regarding the beat quantized FX. Assuming the DB4 like all other mixers will not support tempo synced FX via the software.Never mind, this shit ain't even in english lmao and no subs.
deejdave
5:13 PM - 4 February, 2015
LOL I'll watch anyways. blackavenger is one of the guys I trust by default so there is no doubt in my mind the FX on the DB4 romp the Nexus but I am just curious with the consideration of the tempo matching capability of the SRT. It is my understanding the beat detection system of the DB4 is pretty decent anyways so I am curious how they stack against each other.
Thanks for the video though. I try to pretend to be smart enough that I can tell what they are saying by context clues and visuals anyways...................... LMAO here goes!!
Thanks for the video though. I try to pretend to be smart enough that I can tell what they are saying by context clues and visuals anyways...................... LMAO here goes!!
deejdave
5:17 PM - 4 February, 2015
Another Vs. video Watchwww.youtube.com not to fond of when they simply say................... "Yeah I have one too" but never show it in video BUT he has been pretty spot on up to 1:45 thus far.
Rebelguy
5:53 PM - 4 February, 2015
No second mic input like the Xone 92.
No Innofader for the crossfader.
No rotary option.
Quote:
Anything bad you can think of. Not trying to be a negative person I just like to be real.No second mic input like the Xone 92.
No Innofader for the crossfader.
No rotary option.
Gio Alex
5:56 PM - 4 February, 2015
Thanks for the video though. I try to pretend to be smart enough that I can tell what they are saying by context clues and visuals anyways...................... LMAO here goes!!
I watched a different one and the DB4 beat detection is pretty solid, however, it depends on the format. Vinyl has fluctuation.
Quote:
LOL I'll watch anyways. blackavenger is one of the guys I trust by default so there is no doubt in my mind the FX on the DB4 romp the Nexus but I am just curious with the consideration of the tempo matching capability of the SRT. It is my understanding the beat detection system of the DB4 is pretty decent anyways so I am curious how they stack against each other.Thanks for the video though. I try to pretend to be smart enough that I can tell what they are saying by context clues and visuals anyways...................... LMAO here goes!!
I watched a different one and the DB4 beat detection is pretty solid, however, it depends on the format. Vinyl has fluctuation.
Gio Alex
5:58 PM - 4 February, 2015
No second mic input like the Xone 92.
No Innofader for the crossfader.
No rotary option.
If you're speaking about the DB4, I'm almost certain that it wasn't geared towards any scratcher, BUT you can install an innofader pro though.
www.innofader.com
Quote:
Quote:
Anything bad you can think of. Not trying to be a negative person I just like to be real.No second mic input like the Xone 92.
No Innofader for the crossfader.
No rotary option.
If you're speaking about the DB4, I'm almost certain that it wasn't geared towards any scratcher, BUT you can install an innofader pro though.
www.innofader.com
Rebelguy
6:06 PM - 4 February, 2015
If you're speaking about the DB4, I'm almost certain that it wasn't geared towards any scratcher, BUT you can install an innofader pro though.
www.innofader.com
Yes I was talking about the DB4. I know it's not geared towards turntabalists but given the price point they could have went with a high end fader. Pioneer dropped in the MAGVEL CROSS FADER into their DJM-900SRT for enhanced durability.
Quote:
If you're speaking about the DB4, I'm almost certain that it wasn't geared towards any scratcher, BUT you can install an innofader pro though.
www.innofader.com
Yes I was talking about the DB4. I know it's not geared towards turntabalists but given the price point they could have went with a high end fader. Pioneer dropped in the MAGVEL CROSS FADER into their DJM-900SRT for enhanced durability.
deejdave
6:08 PM - 4 February, 2015
Yeah I was under the impression there is the innofader option and some other newer company I am trying to find out about now. As far as the corssfader is concerned I typically don't think this was aimed at scratch DJ's IMO. I actually disable the crossfader on my SRT, SZ, SX etc. via the software. Secondary Mic could be an issue for mobile DJ's but again.......... not sure if that was the target with the DB4.
The no rotary option sucks. Even with the 900 you technically have the option. No official option but VERY easy to mod using the parts of the predecessor DJM-800.
Thanks for that. Anything else you can think of fire away. So far I am leaps N bounds sold on the DB4. I already have the club kit yet I REFUSE to use it with my 900Nexus so it will be nice to have something to use it with when it is supported.
The no rotary option sucks. Even with the 900 you technically have the option. No official option but VERY easy to mod using the parts of the predecessor DJM-800.
Thanks for that. Anything else you can think of fire away. So far I am leaps N bounds sold on the DB4. I already have the club kit yet I REFUSE to use it with my 900Nexus so it will be nice to have something to use it with when it is supported.
deejdave
6:09 PM - 4 February, 2015
I seriously have a tough time noticing the difference on my Nexus and SRT. Maybe if I was more of a scratcher. Was this strictly for durability as in longevity or actual feel of the fading?
Quote:
Pioneer dropped in the MAGVEL CROSS FADER into their DJM-900SRT for enhanced durability.I seriously have a tough time noticing the difference on my Nexus and SRT. Maybe if I was more of a scratcher. Was this strictly for durability as in longevity or actual feel of the fading?
deejdave
6:11 PM - 4 February, 2015
BTW from the few reviews I saw thus far it seems most feel the same way Rebelguy do as well. One of the few gripes on the DB4 seems to be the crossfader and what SHOULD have been included by default with the premium pricing.
Rebelguy
6:13 PM - 4 February, 2015
I seriously have a tough time noticing the difference on my Nexus and SRT. Maybe if I was more of a scratcher. Was this strictly for durability as in longevity or actual feel of the fading?
It's more durability as in longevity.
Quote:
I seriously have a tough time noticing the difference on my Nexus and SRT. Maybe if I was more of a scratcher. Was this strictly for durability as in longevity or actual feel of the fading?
It's more durability as in longevity.
blackavenger
7:45 PM - 4 February, 2015
Well, the DB4 certainly wasn't directed towards the scratching community, but Andy C (arguably the best DnB DJ in the world) uses the DB4 live, and he's a beast at scratching. Though, admittedly, I am not sure if he switched out the crossfader for an innofader. I doubt it though.
WarpNote
1:11 AM - 5 February, 2015
My local DJ store guy says he has more issues/repairs with A&H mixers than others.
And this guy is a vinyl spinning techno DJ btw. The DB4 looks like a beast to me, I'm sure it's gonna be very nice to play on, and AH is well known for great sound quality in general.
Just bringing on what he said, he's a somewhat of a veteran, knows his stuff well, has owned a store for about 15 years, not a typical sales guy, just straight up honest answers.
And this guy is a vinyl spinning techno DJ btw. The DB4 looks like a beast to me, I'm sure it's gonna be very nice to play on, and AH is well known for great sound quality in general.
Just bringing on what he said, he's a somewhat of a veteran, knows his stuff well, has owned a store for about 15 years, not a typical sales guy, just straight up honest answers.
blackavenger
5:46 AM - 5 February, 2015
Being that the DB series is A&H's first foray into the completely digital realm, I could see there being issues. But, as I have stated, my friend has a DB4, and has had nothing but positive things to say about it. I have played on it several times, and I too have thoroughly enjoyed it. Bare in mind, we are using CDJ-2000nxs' with them....no DVS software.....straight Rekordbox.
Djaward
12:48 AM - 6 February, 2015
Is the sound on the 57 MK II going to be better or same as the 62?
Im really thinking about purchasing that mixer but might want to wait for the second batch.
Im really thinking about purchasing that mixer but might want to wait for the second batch.
Rebelguy
12:57 AM - 6 February, 2015
I always thought the first generation 57 was the best of the bunch. The second generation had button issues. The third gen was a bit better.
deejdave
2:26 AM - 6 February, 2015
I didn't have one so understand I am strictly asking.................. but isn't it commonly known that the 57 in general had inferior sound? This is what I have heard throughout the years but I have never asked myself. Being you seem to know a bit more (with generation differences etc.) what would your stance be on this?
Gio Alex
2:36 AM - 6 February, 2015
There have been so many debates and till this day I still don't really get it. Granted, I mostly used the 57 with wax, and never really heard the harsh criticism. I also used it a lot with serato, but I dunno. I don't think it's as bad as people say it was/is. I think a good amount of the criticism started with the 60 series dropped. I will say, I never used it on a big sound system. Mostly small venues and mid-sized lounges.
Quote:
I didn't have one so understand I am strictly asking.................. but isn't it commonly known that the 57 in general had inferior sound? This is what I have heard throughout the years but I have never asked myself. Being you seem to know a bit more (with generation differences etc.) what would your stance be on this?There have been so many debates and till this day I still don't really get it. Granted, I mostly used the 57 with wax, and never really heard the harsh criticism. I also used it a lot with serato, but I dunno. I don't think it's as bad as people say it was/is. I think a good amount of the criticism started with the 60 series dropped. I will say, I never used it on a big sound system. Mostly small venues and mid-sized lounges.
Rebelguy
2:41 AM - 6 February, 2015
It would depend on what you are comparing it against. My main complaint was the headroom.
Quote:
I didn't have one so understand I am strictly asking.................. but isn't it commonly known that the 57 in general had inferior sound? This is what I have heard throughout the years but I have never asked myself. Being you seem to know a bit more (with generation differences etc.) what would your stance be on this?It would depend on what you are comparing it against. My main complaint was the headroom.
Gio Alex
2:43 AM - 6 February, 2015
It would depend on what you are comparing it against. My main complaint was the headroom.
I will agree with this, the 56 as well. Especially compare to the DJM-800 + series. Very little headroom on the 56/57. Shit would max or bleed very easily. On gigs where I would bring my sound I always carried a small mackie mixer.
Quote:
Quote:
I didn't have one so understand I am strictly asking.................. but isn't it commonly known that the 57 in general had inferior sound? This is what I have heard throughout the years but I have never asked myself. Being you seem to know a bit more (with generation differences etc.) what would your stance be on this?It would depend on what you are comparing it against. My main complaint was the headroom.
I will agree with this, the 56 as well. Especially compare to the DJM-800 + series. Very little headroom on the 56/57. Shit would max or bleed very easily. On gigs where I would bring my sound I always carried a small mackie mixer.
deejdave
2:57 AM - 6 February, 2015
Well with the 800 there was no sound card so compared to Rane 62, 64, DJM-900SRT etc. how is the sound quality. Was it strictly the headroom or are the complaints on quality warranted?
I have heard this before. Seems to be the go-to solution for Akai AMX etc. which I would fully recommend over the alternatives. Some have brought up plugging the unit into a powered USB hub. Not sure if this would affect the 57 though being it is powered by default.
Quote:
On gigs where I would bring my sound I always carried a small mackie mixer.I have heard this before. Seems to be the go-to solution for Akai AMX etc. which I would fully recommend over the alternatives. Some have brought up plugging the unit into a powered USB hub. Not sure if this would affect the 57 though being it is powered by default.
Gio Alex
3:15 AM - 6 February, 2015
Back in the day a lot of cats were playing tracks that were 192kbps and in most, if not all cases you can tell the quality. So I can see where this was an issue. Especially old hip hop tracks that were mastered very differently. You can definitely hear all the imperfections. As far as sound goes that's what I noticed, but I'm sure the same goes with any digital track. That's just my experiences with the 57.
And when you were in yellow you really heard the distortion and it was brutal. That's what I also notice with the 56/57 as opposed to the DJM 4CH series that had more headroom so yellow didn't necessarily mean distortion.
Not that extreme, but I'd compare the Akai AMX to something more like the VCI-300. Where I'd definitely recommend a separate mixer to connect to.
Quote:
Well with the 800 there was no sound card so compared to Rane 62, 64, DJM-900SRT etc. how is the sound quality. Was it strictly the headroom or are the complaints on quality warranted?Back in the day a lot of cats were playing tracks that were 192kbps and in most, if not all cases you can tell the quality. So I can see where this was an issue. Especially old hip hop tracks that were mastered very differently. You can definitely hear all the imperfections. As far as sound goes that's what I noticed, but I'm sure the same goes with any digital track. That's just my experiences with the 57.
And when you were in yellow you really heard the distortion and it was brutal. That's what I also notice with the 56/57 as opposed to the DJM 4CH series that had more headroom so yellow didn't necessarily mean distortion.
Quote:
I have heard this before. Seems to be the go-to solution for Akai AMX etc. which I would fully recommend over the alternatives. Some have brought up plugging the unit into a powered USB hub. Not sure if this would affect the 57 though being it is powered by default.Not that extreme, but I'd compare the Akai AMX to something more like the VCI-300. Where I'd definitely recommend a separate mixer to connect to.
deejdave
3:23 AM - 6 February, 2015
That's what I figured. TBH the thing doesn't even have a mic input so to me the choice seems simple. Add separate mixer and gain headroom, mic's and possibly a few more options and inputs. Add USB hub and you are officially now sporting an unsupported setup but you may gain more volume as well LOL.
Gio Alex
3:35 AM - 6 February, 2015
LOL... i dunno, i'd treat the AMX as a bedroom mixer. But that's just me. I just don't trust it for a "professional" gig.
Quote:
That's what I figured. TBH the thing doesn't even have a mic input so to me the choice seems simple. Add separate mixer and gain headroom, mic's and possibly a few more options and inputs. Add USB hub and you are officially now sporting an unsupported setup but you may gain more volume as well LOL.LOL... i dunno, i'd treat the AMX as a bedroom mixer. But that's just me. I just don't trust it for a "professional" gig.
deejdave
3:47 AM - 6 February, 2015
Thats JUST what it is for me LMAO> I'd go one step past and instead of labeling it as a bedROOM mixer it is my bedSIDE mixer haha. Has not left my bedside since I got it and it is awesome for those late night things. Mostly when I have questions and need to reference the online view and don't want to head down to the lab. Not gonna lie I have a lot of gear (SX, SZ, 64, 900SRT, NS7II, and a few more) but the AMX has been seeing more practice than any of the others lately. Just out of convenience I guess.
There are those who are using it for actual gigging though. Again to each his own but I would agree with you on this. TBH I have caught a bit of heat from others when vocalizing (or writing I should say) my similar opinions. Even with a sub controller it just lacks so much. I have enough trouble stepping down to my SZ/SX from my CDJ/Mixer rig.
For the price though I fully recommend the AMX/AFX combo.
There are those who are using it for actual gigging though. Again to each his own but I would agree with you on this. TBH I have caught a bit of heat from others when vocalizing (or writing I should say) my similar opinions. Even with a sub controller it just lacks so much. I have enough trouble stepping down to my SZ/SX from my CDJ/Mixer rig.
For the price though I fully recommend the AMX/AFX combo.
Asu
2:14 PM - 6 February, 2015
The sound issue was mostly soundcard related with 16Bit+Headroom vs 24bit mixers/sound cards that came out after that...NI cards had some amazing/heavy sound compared to the 57...Rane 6X series fixed that.
you could tell the difference even on bigger systems.
Quote:
I didn't have one so understand I am strictly asking.................. but isn't it commonly known that the 57 in general had inferior sound?The sound issue was mostly soundcard related with 16Bit+Headroom vs 24bit mixers/sound cards that came out after that...NI cards had some amazing/heavy sound compared to the 57...Rane 6X series fixed that.
you could tell the difference even on bigger systems.
nik39
4:28 PM - 6 February, 2015
The sound issue was mostly soundcard related with 16Bit+Headroom vs 24bit mixers/sound cards that came out after that...NI cards had some amazing/heavy sound compared to the 57...Rane 6X series fixed that.
you could tell the difference even on bigger systems.
The Rane 57 has actually 24Bit Output.
And when you were in yellow you really heard the distortion and it was brutal. That's what I also notice with the 56/57 as opposed to the DJM 4CH series that had more headroom so yellow didn't necessarily mean distortion.
Are you sure? It was digitally clipping when it hit red, but it was not clipping before.
The 57 is a very good sounding mixer! And it sounds so much better than any of the Pioneer DJM series.
Quote:
Quote:
I didn't have one so understand I am strictly asking.................. but isn't it commonly known that the 57 in general had inferior sound?The sound issue was mostly soundcard related with 16Bit+Headroom vs 24bit mixers/sound cards that came out after that...NI cards had some amazing/heavy sound compared to the 57...Rane 6X series fixed that.
you could tell the difference even on bigger systems.
The Rane 57 has actually 24Bit Output.
Quote:
Back in the day a lot of cats were playing tracks that were 192kbps and in most, if not all cases you can tell the quality. So I can see where this was an issue. Especially old hip hop tracks that were mastered very differently. You can definitely hear all the imperfections. As far as sound goes that's what I noticed, but I'm sure the same goes with any digital track. That's just my experiences with the 57.And when you were in yellow you really heard the distortion and it was brutal. That's what I also notice with the 56/57 as opposed to the DJM 4CH series that had more headroom so yellow didn't necessarily mean distortion.
Are you sure? It was digitally clipping when it hit red, but it was not clipping before.
The 57 is a very good sounding mixer! And it sounds so much better than any of the Pioneer DJM series.
Asu
5:17 PM - 6 February, 2015
where did you hear that? the actual sound card is 16-bit, 44.1kHz from what i know and the NI gear always sounded deeper+louder on the same system...used to play with a buddy on the same house system
Quote:
The Rane 57 has actually 24Bit Output.where did you hear that? the actual sound card is 16-bit, 44.1kHz from what i know and the NI gear always sounded deeper+louder on the same system...used to play with a buddy on the same house system
WarpNote
5:59 PM - 6 February, 2015
Nik's right, it's kinda both though.
The "mixer digital audio" is listed as "24-bit, 44.1 kHz, 102 dB dynamic range" while
the "USB digital audio" is listed as "16-bit, 44.1 kHz, 102 dB dynamic range".
Page 4 in the manual -> www.rane.com
The "mixer digital audio" is listed as "24-bit, 44.1 kHz, 102 dB dynamic range" while
the "USB digital audio" is listed as "16-bit, 44.1 kHz, 102 dB dynamic range".
Page 4 in the manual -> www.rane.com
Asu
7:56 PM - 6 February, 2015
The "mixer digital audio" is listed as "24-bit, 44.1 kHz, 102 dB dynamic range" while
the "USB digital audio" is listed as "16-bit, 44.1 kHz, 102 dB dynamic range".
Page 4 in the manual -> www.rane.com
interesting.
Quote:
Nik's right, it's kinda both though.The "mixer digital audio" is listed as "24-bit, 44.1 kHz, 102 dB dynamic range" while
the "USB digital audio" is listed as "16-bit, 44.1 kHz, 102 dB dynamic range".
Page 4 in the manual -> www.rane.com
interesting.
Gio Alex
10:26 PM - 6 February, 2015
The "mixer digital audio" is listed as "24-bit, 44.1 kHz, 102 dB dynamic range" while
the "USB digital audio" is listed as "16-bit, 44.1 kHz, 102 dB dynamic range".
Page 4 in the manual -> www.rane.com
interesting.
Very.
Quote:
Quote:
Nik's right, it's kinda both though.The "mixer digital audio" is listed as "24-bit, 44.1 kHz, 102 dB dynamic range" while
the "USB digital audio" is listed as "16-bit, 44.1 kHz, 102 dB dynamic range".
Page 4 in the manual -> www.rane.com
interesting.
Very.
Gio Alex
11:17 PM - 6 February, 2015
The "mixer digital audio" is listed as "24-bit, 44.1 kHz, 102 dB dynamic range" while
the "USB digital audio" is listed as "16-bit, 44.1 kHz, 102 dB dynamic range".
Page 4 in the manual -> www.rane.com
Which explains how I always said I had no probs spinning vinyl with it. I honestly think a good portion of the sound complaints came when the 60 series dropped and a bunch of people hopped on the bandwagon of complaints. Some really genuinely noticed it, but a lot were just repeating what they heard people say.
Like I said, my main issue was headroom and when a track was crappy you can REALLY hear it, but I always thought it sounded better than my 909. At least the EQ section. I dunno.
I mean, I do agree that NI adopted higher quality sounds cards long before. I used to have a NI audio 4 with scratch duo and that was a while back. We're talking about something that went for less than an SL1/SL2 but similar specs to an SL3 when an SL1 was the main box. SL2 wasn't even out yet.
Quote:
Nik's right, it's kinda both though.The "mixer digital audio" is listed as "24-bit, 44.1 kHz, 102 dB dynamic range" while
the "USB digital audio" is listed as "16-bit, 44.1 kHz, 102 dB dynamic range".
Page 4 in the manual -> www.rane.com
Which explains how I always said I had no probs spinning vinyl with it. I honestly think a good portion of the sound complaints came when the 60 series dropped and a bunch of people hopped on the bandwagon of complaints. Some really genuinely noticed it, but a lot were just repeating what they heard people say.
Like I said, my main issue was headroom and when a track was crappy you can REALLY hear it, but I always thought it sounded better than my 909. At least the EQ section. I dunno.
I mean, I do agree that NI adopted higher quality sounds cards long before. I used to have a NI audio 4 with scratch duo and that was a while back. We're talking about something that went for less than an SL1/SL2 but similar specs to an SL3 when an SL1 was the main box. SL2 wasn't even out yet.
deejdave
2:09 AM - 7 February, 2015
This is honestly what I figured and is also the reason I asked/brought it up. I am assuming the 57MKII would have an updated sound card though.
This is comparing the sound of the sound cards and not just straight through inputs correct? I am assuming the only way to truly compare this would be using the 57 with alternate software as as far as I know there is no way to compare using Serato being the SRT is the only DJM mixer supported by Serato (until the club kit support kicks in Grrrr!! LOL) and it is for SDJ strictly and the 57 (MK1) would be for SSL strictly.
Quote:
I honestly think a good portion of the sound complaints came when the 60 series dropped and a bunch of people hopped on the bandwagon of complaints. Some really genuinely noticed it, but a lot were just repeating what they heard people say.This is honestly what I figured and is also the reason I asked/brought it up. I am assuming the 57MKII would have an updated sound card though.
Quote:
The 57 is a very good sounding mixer! And it sounds so much better than any of the Pioneer DJM series.This is comparing the sound of the sound cards and not just straight through inputs correct? I am assuming the only way to truly compare this would be using the 57 with alternate software as as far as I know there is no way to compare using Serato being the SRT is the only DJM mixer supported by Serato (until the club kit support kicks in Grrrr!! LOL) and it is for SDJ strictly and the 57 (MK1) would be for SSL strictly.
Zach S
10:51 PM - 9 February, 2015
The ONLY time the 57 will distort is if you run it into the red. The mixer should always be ran into the hot yellow.
If you were hearing distortion running in the yellow than the audio was distorting coming out of SSL... not the mixer.
Quote:
And when you were in yellow you really heard the distortion and it was brutal. That's what I also notice with the 56/57 as opposed to the DJM 4CH series that had more headroom so yellow didn't necessarily mean distortion.The ONLY time the 57 will distort is if you run it into the red. The mixer should always be ran into the hot yellow.
If you were hearing distortion running in the yellow than the audio was distorting coming out of SSL... not the mixer.
Gio Alex
10:58 PM - 9 February, 2015
The ONLY time the 57 will distort is if you run it into the red. The mixer should always be ran into the hot yellow.
If you were hearing distortion running in the yellow than the audio was distorting coming out of SSL... not the mixer.
This is true. What about the 56? You start to hear it slightly in that zone.
Quote:
Quote:
And when you were in yellow you really heard the distortion and it was brutal. That's what I also notice with the 56/57 as opposed to the DJM 4CH series that had more headroom so yellow didn't necessarily mean distortion.The ONLY time the 57 will distort is if you run it into the red. The mixer should always be ran into the hot yellow.
If you were hearing distortion running in the yellow than the audio was distorting coming out of SSL... not the mixer.
This is true. What about the 56? You start to hear it slightly in that zone.
Zach S
11:29 PM - 9 February, 2015
Same goes with the 56 and every other Rane mixer. All mixers are meant to be ran at hot yellow but not red. This ensures the best possible signal to noise ratio.
Gio Alex
11:38 PM - 9 February, 2015
But the issue is headroom though, I and others have always felt the output wasn't loud enough compared to the DJM 4ch series mixers, am I bugging here?
Quote:
Same goes with the 56 and every other Rane mixer. All mixers are meant to be ran at hot yellow but not red. This ensures the best possible signal to noise ratio.But the issue is headroom though, I and others have always felt the output wasn't loud enough compared to the DJM 4ch series mixers, am I bugging here?
Zach S
12:13 AM - 10 February, 2015
The output of the 57 and 56 are extremely loud. I have not personally A/B'ed them with a Pioneer 800 or 900 but if the output of the 800 or 900 were louder I don't think its not going to be much louder. Regardless, the solution is to turn up the amps and/or speakers to make up any difference.
I do recognize there are situations at clubs where this isn't possible due to the DJ not having access to the main system in which case someone would use a little Mackie board or something. Once again though.. I don't think the output of the 800 or 900 would be that different, if any.
I do recognize there are situations at clubs where this isn't possible due to the DJ not having access to the main system in which case someone would use a little Mackie board or something. Once again though.. I don't think the output of the 800 or 900 would be that different, if any.
Taipanic
3:52 PM - 10 February, 2015
I've always felt that the Rane mixers have always had enough headroom - in a properly configured system. The real issue is that many systems are not set up properly by true sound engineers. Knowing how to properly EQ, set crosover frequencies & compression/limiting is an art unto itself. Most small club systems can use some serious help in the configuration department. A properly set up system will sound good and go loud without blowing up.
If a system is properly set up and still not loud enough, then there is not enough rig for the gig.
If a system is properly set up and still not loud enough, then there is not enough rig for the gig.
Rebelguy
4:46 PM - 10 February, 2015
Could the Pioneer mixers Master attenuator option explain their increased output over the TTM-57?
Quote:
The output of the 57 and 56 are extremely loud. I have not personally A/B'ed them with a Pioneer 800 or 900 but if the output of the 800 or 900 were louder I don't think its not going to be much louder. Regardless, the solution is to turn up the amps and/or speakers to make up any difference.Could the Pioneer mixers Master attenuator option explain their increased output over the TTM-57?
Zach S
6:14 PM - 10 February, 2015
Yes.. with this all the way up the output of an 800 or 900 may be louder but its not going to be a huge difference. Also.. loudness does not equal good sound.
I think the 800 sounds terrible. The 900 is pretty good as is the 57.
Quote:
Could the Pioneer mixers Master attenuator option explain their increased output over the TTM-57?Yes.. with this all the way up the output of an 800 or 900 may be louder but its not going to be a huge difference. Also.. loudness does not equal good sound.
I think the 800 sounds terrible. The 900 is pretty good as is the 57.
Gio Alex
6:21 PM - 10 February, 2015
Yes.. with this all the way up the output of an 800 or 900 may be louder but its not going to be a huge difference. Also.. loudness does not equal good sound.
I think the 800 sounds terrible. The 900 is pretty good as is the 57.
Hey Zach! This is great to hear, but where were you when all the trash talk about the 57 sounding horrible. lol This has been an on going debate for quite some time. I personally haven't had any sound quality issues with it. What's your take on this?
Quote:
Quote:
Could the Pioneer mixers Master attenuator option explain their increased output over the TTM-57?Yes.. with this all the way up the output of an 800 or 900 may be louder but its not going to be a huge difference. Also.. loudness does not equal good sound.
I think the 800 sounds terrible. The 900 is pretty good as is the 57.
Hey Zach! This is great to hear, but where were you when all the trash talk about the 57 sounding horrible. lol This has been an on going debate for quite some time. I personally haven't had any sound quality issues with it. What's your take on this?
nik39
6:56 PM - 10 February, 2015
+1. The 900 sounds good to me too.
Quote:
I think the 800 sounds terrible. The 900 is pretty good as is the 57.+1. The 900 sounds good to me too.
Code:E
9:23 PM - 10 February, 2015
Yes.. with this all the way up the output of an 800 or 900 may be louder but its not going to be a huge difference. Also.. loudness does not equal good sound.
I think the 800 sounds terrible. The 900 is pretty good as is the 57.
Hey Zach! This is great to hear, but where were you when all the trash talk about the 57 sounding horrible. lol This has been an on going debate for quite some time. I personally haven't had any sound quality issues with it. What's your take on this?
I'm a huge trash talker about the 57. But it's not the mixer it's self sound quality that I dislike, rather is the sound card.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Could the Pioneer mixers Master attenuator option explain their increased output over the TTM-57?Yes.. with this all the way up the output of an 800 or 900 may be louder but its not going to be a huge difference. Also.. loudness does not equal good sound.
I think the 800 sounds terrible. The 900 is pretty good as is the 57.
Hey Zach! This is great to hear, but where were you when all the trash talk about the 57 sounding horrible. lol This has been an on going debate for quite some time. I personally haven't had any sound quality issues with it. What's your take on this?
I'm a huge trash talker about the 57. But it's not the mixer it's self sound quality that I dislike, rather is the sound card.
DJ GaFFle
11:48 AM - 12 February, 2015
Yes.. with this all the way up the output of an 800 or 900 may be louder but its not going to be a huge difference. Also.. loudness does not equal good sound...
Thanx, I was about to say the same. Many don't understand this, nor do they understand proper gain structure.
Quote:
Quote:
Could the Pioneer mixers Master attenuator option explain their increased output over the TTM-57?Yes.. with this all the way up the output of an 800 or 900 may be louder but its not going to be a huge difference. Also.. loudness does not equal good sound...
Thanx, I was about to say the same. Many don't understand this, nor do they understand proper gain structure.
nik39
11:50 AM - 12 February, 2015
Yes.. with this all the way up the output of an 800 or 900 may be louder but its not going to be a huge difference. Also.. loudness does not equal good sound...
Thanx, I was about to say the same. Many don't understand this, nor do they understand proper gain structure.
Whta do u meen? I thinks all lights must be on on the channel LEDs and master LEDs. I thinks = if not red then not bass enough.
No?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Could the Pioneer mixers Master attenuator option explain their increased output over the TTM-57?Yes.. with this all the way up the output of an 800 or 900 may be louder but its not going to be a huge difference. Also.. loudness does not equal good sound...
Thanx, I was about to say the same. Many don't understand this, nor do they understand proper gain structure.
Whta do u meen? I thinks all lights must be on on the channel LEDs and master LEDs. I thinks = if not red then not bass enough.
No?
Zach S
5:49 PM - 12 February, 2015
As long as the mixer isn't red lined the 57 sounds amazing.
Curious what about the sound card you think sounds bad?
Remember... your audio is going to sound as good as the files you're playing through the mixer. Most play mp3s (hopefully 320kbps). At best, people play uncompressed wav or aif files which are 16bit. Even if you are playing 24bit files through the 57 the human ear isn't going to even hear the difference.
Quote:
Hey Zach! This is great to hear, but where were you when all the trash talk about the 57 sounding horrible. lol This has been an on going debate for quite some time. I personally haven't had any sound quality issues with it. What's your take on this?As long as the mixer isn't red lined the 57 sounds amazing.
Quote:
I'm a huge trash talker about the 57. But it's not the mixer it's self sound quality that I dislike, rather is the sound card.Curious what about the sound card you think sounds bad?
Remember... your audio is going to sound as good as the files you're playing through the mixer. Most play mp3s (hopefully 320kbps). At best, people play uncompressed wav or aif files which are 16bit. Even if you are playing 24bit files through the 57 the human ear isn't going to even hear the difference.
Papa Midnight
6:42 PM - 12 February, 2015
Yes.. with this all the way up the output of an 800 or 900 may be louder but its not going to be a huge difference. Also.. loudness does not equal good sound...
Thanx, I was about to say the same. Many don't understand this, nor do they understand proper gain structure.
Whta do u meen? I thinks all lights must be on on the channel LEDs and master LEDs. I thinks = if not red then not bass enough.
No?
Only if all yo nobs r turnt up all da way 2 da rite!!!!
(Am I doing this correctly?)
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Could the Pioneer mixers Master attenuator option explain their increased output over the TTM-57?Yes.. with this all the way up the output of an 800 or 900 may be louder but its not going to be a huge difference. Also.. loudness does not equal good sound...
Thanx, I was about to say the same. Many don't understand this, nor do they understand proper gain structure.
Whta do u meen? I thinks all lights must be on on the channel LEDs and master LEDs. I thinks = if not red then not bass enough.
No?
Only if all yo nobs r turnt up all da way 2 da rite!!!!
(Am I doing this correctly?)
Code:E
7:28 PM - 12 February, 2015
Remember... your audio is going to sound as good as the files you're playing through the mixer. Most play mp3s (hopefully 320kbps). At best, people play uncompressed wav or aif files which are 16bit. Even if you are playing 24bit files through the 57 the human ear isn't going to even hear the difference.
Sorry but BS.
I A/B the TTM 57 and a SL4 with the same files on the same PA at the same time. The sound quality was significantly better. Its so much better that we noticed well playing a set. I looked over at my buddy on his 57 well we where battling, he had just dropped the same track i was playing and lined it up and we switched over to him, and we both though wtf is wrong. checked every setting, everything was normal, the next week before the club opened we A/B a bunch of tracks. The top end and bottom end are so much more defined on the SL4. You get a feeling of depth with it also. The 57 sounds like a always on bandpass.
Quote:
Curious what about the sound card you thing sounds bad?Remember... your audio is going to sound as good as the files you're playing through the mixer. Most play mp3s (hopefully 320kbps). At best, people play uncompressed wav or aif files which are 16bit. Even if you are playing 24bit files through the 57 the human ear isn't going to even hear the difference.
Sorry but BS.
I A/B the TTM 57 and a SL4 with the same files on the same PA at the same time. The sound quality was significantly better. Its so much better that we noticed well playing a set. I looked over at my buddy on his 57 well we where battling, he had just dropped the same track i was playing and lined it up and we switched over to him, and we both though wtf is wrong. checked every setting, everything was normal, the next week before the club opened we A/B a bunch of tracks. The top end and bottom end are so much more defined on the SL4. You get a feeling of depth with it also. The 57 sounds like a always on bandpass.
djsmuve415
7:48 PM - 12 February, 2015
Sorry,,, but I gotta agree with this. I used a 57 for 3 years at a resident spot I was at - and there was just no "ooomph" in the sound. made the places sound system sound flat as shit.
worse part about it all - I recommended the mixer to them. they went out and got it because the other DJ's were leaving the booth in shambles always having to move the Allen & Heath beast around to plug in their box. sure, we got ease of connection & less of a mess to deal with at the end of the night - but we sacrificed low-end for it.
Quote:
The 57 sounds like a always on bandpass.Sorry,,, but I gotta agree with this. I used a 57 for 3 years at a resident spot I was at - and there was just no "ooomph" in the sound. made the places sound system sound flat as shit.
worse part about it all - I recommended the mixer to them. they went out and got it because the other DJ's were leaving the booth in shambles always having to move the Allen & Heath beast around to plug in their box. sure, we got ease of connection & less of a mess to deal with at the end of the night - but we sacrificed low-end for it.
DJ Reflex
9:58 PM - 13 February, 2015
Hmmm... Now granted, I do mobile work, but I am curious now about the sound quality I get from my 57. I have had other mixers, but I revamped my entire rig when I bought the 57 (new tops, new subs, the works). I have no reference point.
djsmuve415 - Have you had a chance to hear any other mixers on that same system? Either before or after the 57 install?
djsmuve415 - Have you had a chance to hear any other mixers on that same system? Either before or after the 57 install?
djsmuve415
11:17 PM - 13 February, 2015
yeah - they had a Allen & Heath Xone 92 before that which I at the same time was also using at another club up the street, on a similar EAW system, overall it was a nice smooth and well rounded sound. Then the 57 came in - both clubs believe it or not at the same time practically - low end in the subs dropped off quite a bit, and yes - headroom and overall loudness diminished.
Now - before anybody pegs me as a A&H fanboy let me say either though I thought the Xone 92 sounded pretty good - every night I approached it literally scratching my head in disgust also. I still think its one of the most weirdest, layed out mixer I've ever seen. sliders all over the place - 4 pot EQ's, yikes, I know some dudes like a lot of control over their sound - but I dont need that much, shit. And it broke constantly, and was temperamental as all hell.
Quote:
djsmuve415 - Have you had a chance to hear any other mixers on that same system? Either before or after the 57 install?yeah - they had a Allen & Heath Xone 92 before that which I at the same time was also using at another club up the street, on a similar EAW system, overall it was a nice smooth and well rounded sound. Then the 57 came in - both clubs believe it or not at the same time practically - low end in the subs dropped off quite a bit, and yes - headroom and overall loudness diminished.
Now - before anybody pegs me as a A&H fanboy let me say either though I thought the Xone 92 sounded pretty good - every night I approached it literally scratching my head in disgust also. I still think its one of the most weirdest, layed out mixer I've ever seen. sliders all over the place - 4 pot EQ's, yikes, I know some dudes like a lot of control over their sound - but I dont need that much, shit. And it broke constantly, and was temperamental as all hell.
Zach S
12:49 AM - 18 February, 2015
I A/B the TTM 57 and a SL4 with the same files on the same PA at the same time. The sound quality was significantly better. Its so much better that we noticed well playing a set. I looked over at my buddy on his 57 well we where battling, he had just dropped the same track i was playing and lined it up and we switched over to him, and we both though wtf is wrong. checked every setting, everything was normal, the next week before the club opened we A/B a bunch of tracks. The top end and bottom end are so much more defined on the SL4. You get a feeling of depth with it also. The 57 sounds like a always on bandpass.
I never said the 57 sounded just as good as the SL4.
I will definitely agree with you that the SL4, SL3, and SL2 will sound better than the 57 or the SL1. The newer models have a wider dynamic range and more punch no doubt.
Quote:
Sorry but BS.I A/B the TTM 57 and a SL4 with the same files on the same PA at the same time. The sound quality was significantly better. Its so much better that we noticed well playing a set. I looked over at my buddy on his 57 well we where battling, he had just dropped the same track i was playing and lined it up and we switched over to him, and we both though wtf is wrong. checked every setting, everything was normal, the next week before the club opened we A/B a bunch of tracks. The top end and bottom end are so much more defined on the SL4. You get a feeling of depth with it also. The 57 sounds like a always on bandpass.
I never said the 57 sounded just as good as the SL4.
I will definitely agree with you that the SL4, SL3, and SL2 will sound better than the 57 or the SL1. The newer models have a wider dynamic range and more punch no doubt.
Asu
3:52 AM - 3 March, 2015
It's March...when is the 57-MKII available? early or late March? Looking to grab one :-)
Djkom
9:47 AM - 3 March, 2015
Seems that the 1.7.4 beta public announcement does even not mention support for this 57mk2 so I'm quite perplex ... Maybe there is also a near 1.7.5 in the pipeline and Serato just waits the mixer availability in stores...
Asu
1:50 PM - 3 March, 2015
1.7.4 should be the version for the MK2 at Namm they had a working version i'm assuming it's 1.7.4
Quote:
Seems that the 1.7.4 beta public announcement does even not mention support for this 57mk2 so I'm quite perplex ... Maybe there is also a near 1.7.5 in the pipeline and Serato just waits the mixer availability in stores...1.7.4 should be the version for the MK2 at Namm they had a working version i'm assuming it's 1.7.4
Rebelguy
8:36 PM - 6 March, 2015
Why would it be easy?
Quote:
they will just add a small update with it. thats easy .Why would it be easy?
deejdave
9:25 PM - 6 March, 2015
I am sure they already have it completed just not released yet. It would be just like any other device. Why would it be difficult?
Phuture2
10:53 PM - 6 March, 2015
Nothing is easy when it comes to adding anything in Serato DJ or anything else computer driven. One added feature hopefully will not effect something else.
Asu
4:46 PM - 8 March, 2015
Mixer will be in our hands by the end of this month according to my pre-order...it has to be 1.7.4,the mixer coming out while not being usable? don't see that happening...maybe Serato just didn't mention it in the notes i think.
Samuel S
5:50 PM - 8 March, 2015
This won't happen - there will be an update when this mixer is available for support.
Asu
9:46 PM - 8 March, 2015
sounds good
Quote:
This won't happen - there will be an update when this mixer is available for support.sounds good
dj-freestyle
3:39 PM - 11 March, 2015
By easy i meant when mixer is releases there be a update just for it like other stuff thats been released like this.
Asu
1:30 PM - 31 March, 2015
Has anyone received their Rane 57MKII yet? mine still says back ordered.
Michael R
3:56 AM - 1 April, 2015
Rane and Serato are both hard at work on this, we are all trying to get them to market as soon as possible :)
Quote:
Rane hasn't shipped them yet. They are waiting on Serato...Rane and Serato are both hard at work on this, we are all trying to get them to market as soon as possible :)
Samuel S
8:21 AM - 6 April, 2015
As Michael has said above, both Serato and Rane are hard at work delivering everything that needs to be delivered to get this to market as soon as possible.
It's on the way!
Sam.
It's on the way!
Sam.
To participate in this forum discussion please log in to your Serato account.