Hi Ty,
This is definietly in the pipeline. There are a couple of things we need to address before we can change this. We intend to implement it as a greater zoom level on the main waveform view, rather than a bigger overview.

Sam
Serato

Sweet! Thx Sam!

I think it would look better the way Final Scratch have the main overview, but the rest is amasing. I find the close up waveform jitters slightly on my machine. (running ATI 7200 64mb RAM).

If the tempo match waveform was wider too that would be cool.

now that i'm getting used to the vertically scrolling waveform i'm actually finding it quite intuitive to the motion of the records themselves.

Any option of having the waveforms being of adjustable size - ie. being able to drag up and down the line between the information part of the screen (top 1/3) and the part listing the tracks (bottom 2/3) so that you can have the waves displayed bigger or view more tracks at one time as you please? I run at quite high res (1600 x 1200) and find that it's great to be able to see lots of tracks, but the waveforms etc are quite small!

I agree ricochet.
I wish i could rearrange the scrren so that i only see 5-10 songs at the bottom and the records and waveforms scale accordingly. Anyone think that this could be in the future?

Thanks

17

Yeah I for one think this is a good idea... I also have an inkling it would be a TON of work...

well if they've all been programmed statically as a certain pixel resolution rather than a relative value then yes...

hit=nail_on_head

I'd prefer to see a mixing-oriented mode where the rotating decks are replaced by horizontal waveforms that stretch from edge to edge.

i guess that'd be nice although i find the existing waveform overview to be sufficient to see the breakdowns etc... a larger horizontal waveform would certainly be a nice option tho (but more work.. guessing it definitely wouldn't come under the "bug-fixes" category!)

good idea!!!

Actually, a Great Idea, but even if implemented tomorrow, 14 years late!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Slow...
Slower...
Serato!

14 years is not too bad!?

Likely waiting for a while longer since clearly a ton of development and excitement is going to Serato Studio instead Serato DJ

:D



Sadly. Yes.
Feels like a hit in the face for everybody who has been patiently waiting for long demanded features for years now...

Don't be so negative...I just read this -

"It's the way we do things at Serato, everything HAS TO BE CUSTOMER DRIVEN!!! It's the only way to make things that we know people are going to love because they helped us design it."

I'm sure sometime in the NEXT 14 years they'll address the puny waveform issue!

14 years to read it!? Really!? So to address the issue by how many years then we have to multiply 14? Love this style; now we can all take a nice break