DJing Discussion
[HEADS UP] MacBook PRO's on SALE for $1300!!!! WOW!!!
This area is for discussion about DJing in general. Please remember the community rules when posting and try to be polite and inclusive.
[HEADS UP] MacBook PRO's on SALE for $1300!!!! WOW!!!
DjWoody
7:23 AM - 6 March, 2007
Just giving everyone a heads up. CDW has the 2Ghz 15" MacBook Pro's for $1329!!! THAT's A STEAL!!! That's cheaper than the Black MacBook!!!! WOW!!! If I was in the market, I would definetely get it. Too bad I'm shopping for a MacPro.
www.cdw.com
:(
www.cdw.com
:(
djtk
7:27 AM - 6 March, 2007
i thought my boy was lying when he told me apple was dropping the price of the macbook pro. i don't believe it.
Nathan Homie
10:21 AM - 6 March, 2007
Specs from CDW:
2.0GHz Intel Core Duo
512MB RAM
80GB hard drive
Lowest spec'd on Apple.com:
2.16GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
1GB memory
120GB hard drive
And that 'Core 2 Duo' does make a difference... So these are old machines
Still a good price but know what you're buying ;-)
(I'm in the market my self, hence the interest)
2.0GHz Intel Core Duo
512MB RAM
80GB hard drive
Lowest spec'd on Apple.com:
2.16GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
1GB memory
120GB hard drive
And that 'Core 2 Duo' does make a difference... So these are old machines
Still a good price but know what you're buying ;-)
(I'm in the market my self, hence the interest)
DJ Irv
3:29 PM - 6 March, 2007
Nice find DJWoody! That's fairly good price for a new old macbook. In case you guys are wondering the difference between the Core DUO and Core DUO here they go. The Core 2 DUO is able to do 128bit vector instructions (SSE3) in a single clock cycle and the Core DUO splits them in 2 cycles this gives the Core 2 DUO up to 20% advantage clock for clock. The Core 2 DUO can operate in 64Bit making it able to address more than 4Gb of memory but I don't think anyone will ever upgrade their MacBook above 4GB of ram the next 3 years.
DJ Irv
3:54 PM - 6 March, 2007
They have about the same power consumption clock for clock but the Core 2 DUO does more work per watt making it more efficient.
a-swift
3:54 PM - 6 March, 2007
Core II Duo is defintely a much better architechure and can execute more instructions at the same clock rate (Ghz) as a Core Duo. A regular old core duo might seem like a good deal and for running just audio it'll be fine (hell, my 1Ghz Celeron run SSL *fine*),.. but looking to the future, you're gonna need all that Core II Duo horsepower to do things like video, etc.
a-swift
3:55 PM - 6 March, 2007
Also, don't forget CompUSA is closing a gang of stores. There should be some deals here and there as they try to unload inventory.
nik39
7:20 PM - 6 March, 2007
Are you sure? I don't think the c2d is a 64bit processor.
Quote:
The Core 2 DUO can operate in 64Bit making it able to address more than 4Gb of memoryAre you sure? I don't think the c2d is a 64bit processor.
m0nster
8:22 PM - 6 March, 2007
Ya, they are 64bit(from my understanding)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The correct title of this article is x86-64. The initial letter is shown capitalized due to technical restrictions.
x86-64 is a 64-bit microprocessor architecture and corresponding instruction set; it is a superset of the Intel x86 architecture, which it natively supports. It was designed by Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), who have since renamed it AMD64. This architecture has also been adopted by Intel under the name Intel 64 (formerly known as EM64T, IA-32e, Clackamas Technology (CT) in reverse order).[1] The names x86-64 or x64 are sometimes used as vendor-neutral terms to collectively refer to the two nearly identical implementations.
Quote:
x86-64From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The correct title of this article is x86-64. The initial letter is shown capitalized due to technical restrictions.
x86-64 is a 64-bit microprocessor architecture and corresponding instruction set; it is a superset of the Intel x86 architecture, which it natively supports. It was designed by Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), who have since renamed it AMD64. This architecture has also been adopted by Intel under the name Intel 64 (formerly known as EM64T, IA-32e, Clackamas Technology (CT) in reverse order).[1] The names x86-64 or x64 are sometimes used as vendor-neutral terms to collectively refer to the two nearly identical implementations.
m0nster
8:24 PM - 6 March, 2007
more:
Intel 64 was originally implemented on the E revision (Prescott) of Pentium 4 line of microprocessors, which were supported by i915P (Grantsdale) and i925X (Alderwood) chipsets in June 2004. This was largely due to the competitive pressure of AMD's AMD64 technology implemented on Opteron and Athlon 64 lines of microprocessing units, otherwise known as the K8 core, one year earlier in 2003; the technology was largely built compatible to AMD64, and the then announced Windows XP Professional x64 Edition supporting AMD64 technology. Intel's first processor to activate the Intel 64 technology was the multi-socket processor Xeon code-named Nocona. Since the Nocona Xeon itself is directly based on Intel's desktop processor, the Pentium 4, the Pentium 4 also has Intel 64 technology built in, although as with Hyper-Threading, this feature was not initially enabled on the then-new Prescott design, likely because enabling Intel 64 did not coincide with Intel's stance on 64-bit x86 extensions at that particular time. Intel subsequently began selling Intel 64-enabled Pentium 4s using the E0 revision of the Prescott core, being sold on the market as the Pentium 4, model F. However, the revision F core was targeted at workstations. Intel's official launch of Intel 64 (under the name EM64T at that time) in mainstream desktop processors was the N0 Stepping Prescott-2M. The E0 revision also adds eXecute Disable(XD) (Intel's name for the NX bit) support to Intel 64, and has been included in the current Xeon code-named Irwindale. All 9xx/8xx/6xx/5x6/5x1/3x6/3x1 series CPUs have Intel 64 enabled, as do the Core 2 CPUs, and as will all future Intel CPUs. Intel 64 is also present in the last members of the Celeron D line.
The first Intel mobile processor supporting Intel 64 is the Merom version of the Core 2 processor, which was released on 27 July 2006. None of Intel's earlier notebook CPUs (Core Duo, Pentium M, Celeron M, Mobile Pentium 4) support Intel 64.
The following processors implement the Intel 64 architecture:
* Intel NetBurst
o Intel Xeon (some models since "Nocona")
o Intel Celeron D (some models since "Prescott")
o Intel Pentium 4 (some models since "Prescott")
o Intel Pentium D
o Intel Pentium Extreme Edition
* Intel Core microarchitecture
o Intel Xeon ("Woodcrest")
o Intel Core 2
Quote:
ImplementationsIntel 64 was originally implemented on the E revision (Prescott) of Pentium 4 line of microprocessors, which were supported by i915P (Grantsdale) and i925X (Alderwood) chipsets in June 2004. This was largely due to the competitive pressure of AMD's AMD64 technology implemented on Opteron and Athlon 64 lines of microprocessing units, otherwise known as the K8 core, one year earlier in 2003; the technology was largely built compatible to AMD64, and the then announced Windows XP Professional x64 Edition supporting AMD64 technology. Intel's first processor to activate the Intel 64 technology was the multi-socket processor Xeon code-named Nocona. Since the Nocona Xeon itself is directly based on Intel's desktop processor, the Pentium 4, the Pentium 4 also has Intel 64 technology built in, although as with Hyper-Threading, this feature was not initially enabled on the then-new Prescott design, likely because enabling Intel 64 did not coincide with Intel's stance on 64-bit x86 extensions at that particular time. Intel subsequently began selling Intel 64-enabled Pentium 4s using the E0 revision of the Prescott core, being sold on the market as the Pentium 4, model F. However, the revision F core was targeted at workstations. Intel's official launch of Intel 64 (under the name EM64T at that time) in mainstream desktop processors was the N0 Stepping Prescott-2M. The E0 revision also adds eXecute Disable(XD) (Intel's name for the NX bit) support to Intel 64, and has been included in the current Xeon code-named Irwindale. All 9xx/8xx/6xx/5x6/5x1/3x6/3x1 series CPUs have Intel 64 enabled, as do the Core 2 CPUs, and as will all future Intel CPUs. Intel 64 is also present in the last members of the Celeron D line.
The first Intel mobile processor supporting Intel 64 is the Merom version of the Core 2 processor, which was released on 27 July 2006. None of Intel's earlier notebook CPUs (Core Duo, Pentium M, Celeron M, Mobile Pentium 4) support Intel 64.
The following processors implement the Intel 64 architecture:
* Intel NetBurst
o Intel Xeon (some models since "Nocona")
o Intel Celeron D (some models since "Prescott")
o Intel Pentium 4 (some models since "Prescott")
o Intel Pentium D
o Intel Pentium Extreme Edition
* Intel Core microarchitecture
o Intel Xeon ("Woodcrest")
o Intel Core 2
nik39
8:29 PM - 6 March, 2007
Though I don't see this from your quote, I researched a bit and... I stand corrected. My bad. It is indeed 64Bit CPU, wow!
nik39
8:30 PM - 6 March, 2007
(I was referring to your first quote, the second was not there when I typed my answer)
DJ Irv
9:25 PM - 6 March, 2007
I should have been a microprocessor engineer or something. I am waiting for the Athlon K8L to enter the market. It's ability do 128bit vector in 1 clock cycle and do that nifty caching trick the Core DUO's uses to keep it's CPU pipelines stuffed with data should make it catch up to the C2D.
To participate in this forum discussion please log in to your Serato account.