Serato Software Feature Suggestions

What features would you like to see in Serato software?

I'd like to see this added/changed...

HittinSkinzTa2 4:11 PM - 29 July, 2007
I think some, if not all of you would agree...
Instead of only 5 cue points, how about 10? Just add another row right next to the original 5. To access them, just maybe hold down Ctrl and hit cue 1 to access what would be cue 6 etc.

Also... an easier way to access your loops other than hitting the left/right arrows. I don't know if something like this is already available on the 57, but for us SL1 users, I just think there could be a quicker way other than the trackpad to point and click to the next loop. (unless there already is a shortcut that I don't know about. If so... fill a brotha in)

Thx
Konix 4:28 PM - 29 July, 2007
Quote:
I just think there could be a quicker way other than the trackpad to point and click to the next loop. (unless there already is a shortcut that I don't know about. If so... fill a brotha in)


ALT+ O and P for left deck
ALT+ L and ; for right deck
nik39 4:37 PM - 29 July, 2007
Quote:
I think some, if not all of you would agree...
Instead of only 5 cue points, how about 10? Just add another row right next to the original 5. To access them, just maybe hold down Ctrl and hit cue 1 to access what would be cue 6 etc.

How about you have like a tabbed list? You have 9 loops available, and you can change between them by using the ">" "<" buttons, if they would also kind of switch to 9 list of cue points, would be cool I think


Quote:
Also... an easier way to access your loops other than hitting the left/right arrows. I don't know if something like this is already available on the 57

There is such a way.

Quote:
but for us SL1 users, I just think there could be a quicker way other than the trackpad to point and click to the next loop. (unless there already is a shortcut that I don't know about. If so... fill a brotha in)

Good point, I think this it is missing in the manual.
HittinSkinzTa2 6:15 PM - 29 July, 2007
Good looks Konix. :)

Nik, I also agree with the "<" ">" keys. That would work nicely.
I find myself needing/wanting more cues. Hopefully, they'll implement it.