DJing Discussion
Performance Difference with a 5400rpm USB external HD vs. a 7200 rpm Firewire 800 external HD?
Forum
DJing Discussion
Performance Difference with a 5400rpm USB external HD vs. a 7200 rpm Firewire 800 external HD?
This area is for discussion about DJing in general. Please remember the community rules when posting and try to be polite and inclusive.
Performance Difference with a 5400rpm USB external HD vs. a 7200 rpm Firewire 800 external HD?
DLake
2:06 AM - 8 March, 2007
Alright,
I use a powerbook g4 15" 1.5ghz with 1.25gb of ram. it runs sharp and is wonderful blah blah blah
I have a Lacie D2 250gb HD that i always use with firewire 800 into the powerbook.
I use this HD just for music storage (i use an mp3- vinyl dj program and I have all my music on this HD, nothing on the internal).
At DJ Gigs im getting a bit sick of plugging in 8 wires into my laptop (over exagerrating), and then running htem to my laptop then my dj mixer then my turntables etc. etc.)
I want to eliminate bulk and wires and get an External USB harddrive with just a USB powered cable and thats it.
I have seen some that spin 7200 rpm drives that have 1 usb cable from the HD that goes out to 2 usb cables (to get the necessary power to spin the drive). Thats not feasible for me, as I need both of my USB hubs (for the dj program and the usb HD).
okay im blabbering but thats my background.
So this is my question. Since I am only using this for file moving around and playing my songs..... will there be a sudden drop in performance fromm the lacie firewire 800 7200rpm to the usb 5400 hd?
I personally have been using the internal 5400 drive for my music up until a month ago, and have had zero drop outs... so it SHOULD WORK right?
let me know. that question took way too many word....
I use a powerbook g4 15" 1.5ghz with 1.25gb of ram. it runs sharp and is wonderful blah blah blah
I have a Lacie D2 250gb HD that i always use with firewire 800 into the powerbook.
I use this HD just for music storage (i use an mp3- vinyl dj program and I have all my music on this HD, nothing on the internal).
At DJ Gigs im getting a bit sick of plugging in 8 wires into my laptop (over exagerrating), and then running htem to my laptop then my dj mixer then my turntables etc. etc.)
I want to eliminate bulk and wires and get an External USB harddrive with just a USB powered cable and thats it.
I have seen some that spin 7200 rpm drives that have 1 usb cable from the HD that goes out to 2 usb cables (to get the necessary power to spin the drive). Thats not feasible for me, as I need both of my USB hubs (for the dj program and the usb HD).
okay im blabbering but thats my background.
So this is my question. Since I am only using this for file moving around and playing my songs..... will there be a sudden drop in performance fromm the lacie firewire 800 7200rpm to the usb 5400 hd?
I personally have been using the internal 5400 drive for my music up until a month ago, and have had zero drop outs... so it SHOULD WORK right?
let me know. that question took way too many word....
DLake
2:07 AM - 8 March, 2007
sorry.. i posted this in a computer forum so excuse the part about serato being a "mp3-vinyl" program.
Releaux
2:23 AM - 8 March, 2007
There is at least one thread that covers this on the forum and they get all into data transfer rates, etc. Just do a quick search on 7200 and 5400.
Short answer: you should be fine with a 5400 rpm drive if the only thing you're going to use it for is Serato audio playback. If you intend to eventually do video, a 7200 rpm drive may be in your future.
Short answer: you should be fine with a 5400 rpm drive if the only thing you're going to use it for is Serato audio playback. If you intend to eventually do video, a 7200 rpm drive may be in your future.
DJMark
6:46 AM - 8 March, 2007
The rotation speed of the drive isn't an issue for SSL use. Using the USB port instead of Firewire to me is more of a concern.
Why not get a bus-powered Firewire drive? I'm pretty sure there's more current available from the Firewire bus to power a hard drive, and using Firewire definitely is less trouble-prone than USB (using a Firewire drive usually loads the CPU less than using a USB drive).
Why not get a bus-powered Firewire drive? I'm pretty sure there's more current available from the Firewire bus to power a hard drive, and using Firewire definitely is less trouble-prone than USB (using a Firewire drive usually loads the CPU less than using a USB drive).
dj dawn
9:21 AM - 8 March, 2007
Why not get a bus-powered Firewire drive? I'm pretty sure there's more current available from the Firewire bus to power a hard drive, and using Firewire definitely is less trouble-prone than USB (using a Firewire drive usually loads the CPU less than using a USB drive).
I use FW800 and it feels like the CPU loads less than with USB drives as mentioned above!
Quote:
The rotation speed of the drive isn't an issue for SSL use. Using the USB port instead of Firewire to me is more of a concern.Why not get a bus-powered Firewire drive? I'm pretty sure there's more current available from the Firewire bus to power a hard drive, and using Firewire definitely is less trouble-prone than USB (using a Firewire drive usually loads the CPU less than using a USB drive).
I use FW800 and it feels like the CPU loads less than with USB drives as mentioned above!
DLake
3:53 PM - 8 March, 2007
yeah yeah. i use a lacie d2 fw800 7200rpm drive. i just want to downgrade to have less wires and a smaller hd thats all!
DJMark
1:11 AM - 9 March, 2007
So what I'm saying is, use a drive that takes its power from the Firewire bus...then you won't have any need to use a seperate power connector.
For example: this drive www.newegg.com in this case www.newegg.com
For example: this drive www.newegg.com in this case www.newegg.com
To participate in this forum discussion please log in to your Serato account.