DJing Discussion

Forum
 DJing Discussion
NEW features the TTM57 and SSL should have
This area is for discussion about DJing in general. Please remember the community rules when posting and try to be polite and inclusive.

NEW features the TTM57 and SSL should have

hihellohi 3:50 PM - 23 February, 2010
I'm sure alot of people feel that the TTM57sl diserves and update. I also feel that 2.0 is great but they should add a couple more bells and whistles before they officially launch it.

2 things for me.

1. Autosync feature (able to be mapped out to the 57sl)

2. Split cue

I think those would seriously change the ssl and ttm57 market. People would consider to keep or even boost the demand for 57. I think the vci-300/n7 has a monopoly on the auto sync feature. Its so useful and I don't care if you say its cheating or for noobs. I agree it's pretty noob but I since it's out there , I used it and I can mix songs so much faster.
terrible1fi 4:06 PM - 23 February, 2010
1. anyone who wants autosync generally is not going to buy a ttm57. they'd probably buy a vci 300 and use itch, or get something else and use traktor. peeps whos buy a 57 are a completely different market. I have one and I do not want an autosync option personally


2. you can somewhat already use split cue, make sure master cue is off, and with the slider you can adjust the mixing in your headphones. good enough
nik39 8:12 PM - 23 February, 2010
Quote:
1. anyone who wants autosync generally is not going to buy a ttm57. they'd probably buy a vci 300 and use itch, or get something else and use traktor. peeps whos buy a 57 are a completely different market. I have one and I do not want an autosync option personally

Well said.
hihellohi 8:56 PM - 23 February, 2010
I have both, VCI-300 and also 57. I actually want the auto sync.

I know about the master cue, its still a complete not split cue. having master on one ear, and cue in the other
O.B.1 3:04 AM - 24 February, 2010
I do NOT want auto-stink, (beatmatching isn't really that difficult)
I'd rather have the 57'seffects mapped out a little better.
Dj Ace 4:03 AM - 24 February, 2010
Quote:
I have both, VCI-300 and also 57. I actually want the auto sync.

I know about the master cue, its still a complete not split cue. having master on one ear, and cue in the other


sell ur 57 and get a ns7 maybe? or just use your vci -300?

the 57 is for us pros ;)
DJRESERVE 12:12 PM - 24 February, 2010
I'm lucky enough to have all 3. Like I said, there are going to be people pro about the sync and there will be people who disagree.
DJ Super Mario 7:38 PM - 26 February, 2010
Rane/Serato already stated there will never be Auto-Sync in Scratch Live... Now let's hope it they stick to that philosophy. I say NO to Auto-Sync!!!
dj shadow from detroit 10:22 PM - 26 February, 2010
just auto sync in abelton bridge.which to me is a great idea for a dj that has all the basics down.
Dj Ace 2:55 AM - 27 February, 2010
i am pretty sure they feel that way also :)
obi 3:00 AM - 27 February, 2010
Quote:
I'm sure alot of people feel that the TTM57sl diserves and update. I also feel that 2.0 is great but they should add a couple more bells and whistles before they officially launch it.

2 things for me.

1. Autosync feature (able to be mapped out to the 57sl)

2. Split cue

I think those would seriously change the ssl and ttm57 market. People would consider to keep or even boost the demand for 57. I think the vci-300/n7 has a monopoly on the auto sync feature. Its so useful and I don't care if you say its cheating or for noobs. I agree it's pretty noob but I since it's out there , I used it and I can mix songs so much faster.
i agree with the no auto sync feature i dont want it in scratchlive & im pretty sure most djay's using scratclive dont want it either
unclebnz 5:13 PM - 27 February, 2010
How about native support for The Denon DN-S 3700. Please get together and work it out.
DJmikeymike 6:29 PM - 28 February, 2010
+1 for the 3700 support
nik39 6:31 PM - 28 February, 2010
Quote:
Rane/Serato already stated there will never be Auto-Sync in Scratch Live

An official mod stated that? Got a link?
DJ Rumors 11:34 AM - 1 March, 2010
Quote:
1. anyone who wants autosync generally is not going to buy a ttm57. they'd probably buy a vci 300 and use itch, or get something else and use traktor. peeps whos buy a 57 are a completely different market. I have one and I do not want an autosync option personally


+1 I TOTALLY agree with this statement. People who buy the TTM (as I have) are wanting complete CONTROL over their creativity. The TTM allows this by making it possible to customize your mixer to fit your dj needs. If you gonna want "AutoSync" you may as well stay in "internal" mode and use ANY mixer. For the $1200-1500 investment, I'm sure you're gonna want to do more than watch the waveform stroll across the screen, though!
zona816 8:07 PM - 2 March, 2010
I guess the only reason I would want aut sinc is if I ever get to utilize all 4 decks at the same time.