Off Topic Discussion

That which does not fit elsewhere. Please remember the community rules when posting and try to be polite and inclusive.

Gooooooooo YANKEES!!!

DJ CISC0 5:01 PM - 10 March, 2009
So what if we lose A-Rod for like 2 months. We have a nice pitching squad and the rest of the team looks good.

I can't wait until the first RedSaax series :)
tig ol' bitties 5:17 PM - 10 March, 2009
They may look good on paper, but with the fiasco around A-Rod, the clubhouse will be a circus...

Stats and team chemistry are 2 whole diff realms. Think they are a little slack on chemistry at the moment.

Hopefully they can get past it, cuz if not, gonna be a long season...

Sox on the other hand...BALLLLIN!
The Notourious B.K.S. 5:18 PM - 10 March, 2009
Red Sox Pitching Staff > Yankee's Pitching Staff
Red Sox Bull Pen > Yankee's Bullpen

just sayin'
DVDjHardy 5:35 PM - 10 March, 2009
Booooooooooo YANKEES!!!
DVDjHardy 5:38 PM - 10 March, 2009
Yankees = 3rd best team in AL East behind Boston and Tampa! :)
DJ CISC0 5:38 PM - 10 March, 2009
tig: I think we've been playing without any real chemistry since 2001. Honestly, I thought that the whole ARod thing was going to be worse. It has been pretty quite lately though...Maybe because the season didn't start yet?
Lets see if the sox can "Ball" for a full season without Manny this time.

Notorious BKS: Seriously!?
CC Sabathis, AJ Burnett, Joba, Petite, Wang....AND Mo >>> Red Sax pitching.

-my 2 cents
DVDjHardy 5:40 PM - 10 March, 2009
So why's that chemistry problem going to be solved this year? Don't tell me Joe G > Joe T for that locker room...that's just not true.
uno seis 5:49 PM - 10 March, 2009
i will not be surprised when Joba, CC Sabathia and AJ Burnett all get hurt
DJ CISC0 6:25 PM - 10 March, 2009
Quote:
So why's that chemistry problem going to be solved this year? Don't tell me Joe G > Joe T for that locker room...that's just not true.

I never said that it will be solved...just saying that we've played like that since around 2001

Personally, I never liked Joe G as a player nor as the right manager for that locker room. He didn't do too bad last year so I hope he comes through this year.
tig ol' bitties 8:07 PM - 10 March, 2009
Quote:
tig: I think we've been playing without any real chemistry since 2001. Honestly, I thought that the whole ARod thing was going to be worse. It has been pretty quite lately though...Maybe because the season didn't start yet?
Lets see if the sox can "Ball" for a full season without Manny this time.

Notorious BKS: Seriously!?
CC Sabathis, AJ Burnett, Joba, Petite, Wang....AND Mo >>> Red Sax pitching.

-my 2 cents


lol..He said "Petite" hahahaha...

You also got to remember, in most cases players who receive such HUGE contracts ie. C.C. are under immense pressure to perform, that in itself I see being a problem he will fact this year...

Its like Lowell...dude has this monster season 2 seasons ago in his contract year, hits 315, 30 HRs, and 120 RBI...we re-sign him for big money (big money for a pretty old 3rd baseman) and dude kinda sucked last year. DOnt get me wrong he's my fave plpayer on the team, but when it comes to contracts and BIG money pressue gets to guys...

Sox in my opinion have the strongest middle relief and strongest closing pitcher in the game right now. Thats where the Yankees will fail...they better hope their starts avg at least 6-7 innings every game or they will be in trouble.

They lose Arbeu, Giambi, and A-Rod...so they def are gonna to be struggling a little more on the offensive side this season
DJ CISC0 8:57 PM - 10 March, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
tig: I think we've been playing without any real chemistry since 2001. Honestly, I thought that the whole ARod thing was going to be worse. It has been pretty quite lately though...Maybe because the season didn't start yet?
Lets see if the sox can "Ball" for a full season without Manny this time.

Notorious BKS: Seriously!?
CC Sabathis, AJ Burnett, Joba, Petite, Wang....AND Mo >>> Red Sax pitching.

-my 2 cents


lol..He said "Petite" hahahaha...


LOL...what was I thinking?

Anyway...Good points but I think the real pressure is playing in New York and not so much the money for CC. Lets not get into past pitchers who were already making money but couldn't handle NY.

Won't argue so much about your middle relief but will on the closer. I think most people would rather have Mo close a game than Papelbum...my bad Papelbon.

We lose out on a few big bats but don't forget the Mark Teixeira pickup. So it shouldn't be THAT bad.
shiestO! 9:34 PM - 10 March, 2009
i fart in the yankee's general direction.
shiestO! 9:34 PM - 10 March, 2009
north, from here.
dj lad 11:13 PM - 10 March, 2009
Yankees pitching is vastly overrated. Sabathia has thrown 1659.3 innings in his career and he's only entering his age 28 season. That's bad. Since 1975, only 6 pitchers have thrown more innings in their age 20-27 season: one had to become a closer (Eckersley), one is one of the best pitchers ever (Maddux), and four broke down (Gooden, Saberhagen, Witt, Valenzuela) soon thereafter. Add in that he doesn't have a good body to stay healthy and I'd worry - and, oh yeah, he sucks against the Red Sox and is worse at Fenway.

Pettitte (that's how you spell it, by the way) is a league-average pitcher at this point - had a 98 ERA+ last year, a 110 the year before. He's gonna get you 200 innings (probably), which is valuable unto itself (see: Tim Wakefield).

Burnett is, well, I wouldn't trust him to be healthy either. 3 of the last 5 seasons he has spent significant time on the DL.

Wang hasn't been able to stay healthy either - freak injuries or not - missing significant time in two seasons. And, guys who don't get a lot of strikeouts tend to trend down in time. Wang is looking to be an exception to the rule, but guys who don't miss bats just don't do as well - they usually have freakishly good BABIPs which will often even out in the long haul. As I said, though, Wang looks like an exception to that rule since he's got such ridiculous GB rates.

Joba is an interesting case. BP projects him to be a terrific pitcher this year, which is entirely possible. I think he probably ends up outpitching Sabathia and Wang this year with a high-2's/low-3's ERA and competes for the Cy Young Award.

Mo's still the best closer ever, but one day his age will catch up to him. Dude is entering his age 39 season, and he can't keep putting up sub-2.00 ERAs forever.

Meanwhile, the biggest problem the Yankees have is their age of their hitting. Melky has shown to be nothing more than an AAAA type of player. Cano regressed into a hole last year. Derek Jeter is now entering his age 35 season. The man with the $300M contract has a torn labrum and a serious credibility problem due to his steroid use - we all know that steroid users typically don't age well. The outfield consists of a combination of Damon, Matsui, Swisher, Nady, and Brett Gardner (and you never want to count on rookies; see Jacoby Ellsbury). Posada was badly hurt last year and can barely throw to 2nd. Adding Teixeira to replace Giambi helps for sure, but it doesn't change that the offense is rapidly getting older. The Yankees scored the 7th most runs in the AL last year and replaced one piece. That's not really a pathway to success unless you allow 150 runs less, which isn't likely.

If you couldn't tell, I'm a pretty big stat guy.
uno seis 11:35 PM - 10 March, 2009
dj lad is my new favorite person on this board
DJ CISC0 1:22 AM - 11 March, 2009
Interesting stats and opinions there lad.

I don't count on stats too much because they can be misleading when it comes to pitchers in particular. See, one can have a loss on paper but it wouldn't say HOW the pitcher got the loss (eg:lack of run support).

People seem to forget that the Yankees have been getting these high priced players to win them championships NOW not 3,4,5 years from now. They've been doing this since 2000. So the CC stat is indeed an interesting one, it's really irrelevant being that he's up for a new contract at/around when he does start breaking down. For now I think he'll survive a few good years. He has never played against Boston or at Fenway as a Yankee so we'll see how it goes.

PETTITTE has a 1 year contract and IS expected to at least pitch 200 innings. Exactly what the Yankees need this year.

Wang doesn't get alot of strikeouts but he does get a lot of grounders which is why I wouldn't pay the SO stat much mind. He does gets injured a lot so I hope he stays healthy this year.

Our OF is suspect no doubt about but it shouldn't be too bad. Our main focus was getting pitching and that's what we did. With good pitching they wouldn't NEED to produce as many runs this year.
Honestly, I'm not worried about Cano because of his weak year. I'll worry about it if he has another one though. We have had a fairly old team for a good amount of years now and still managed to make it to at least the playoffs (except last year). Our main problem wasn't during the season but producing runs during the post season.
dj lad 6:30 PM - 11 March, 2009
No serious baseball mind looks at wins and losses. They're basically useless. I wouldn't ever actually quote a W/L record to determine a good pitcher.

As for Sabathaia...it's not irrelevant.

-Witt threw 220 innings at age 28, then failed to throw a combined 200 innings the rest of his career. Done.
-Valenzuela threw 196.7 at age 28, then had an ERA+ over 100 twice the rest of his career, with most of his ERA+ numbers in the 80-90 range. Bad.
-Gooden's interesting because he also threw 218 innings at age 19. He threw 200 innings at age 28, then never threw 200 innings again, and he missed most of 1994 and all of 1995. Of course, Doc also had his own non-injury related problems.
-Saberhagen threw 97 innings at age 28, then bounced around the majors, posting ERAs of 3.29, 2.74, 4.18, 6.58, 3.96, and 2.95. Not bad at all, but those were in a combined 789.6 innings over 6 seasons. If you only get that many innings out of CC over the next seasons, he's a HUGE bust.

I'm not saying this is guaranteed to happen to CC. He's shown to be a horse, but he's also had a bunch of bad postseasons, simply because his arm was ridden so hard. My prediction? He has a career that looks more like Dave Stieb (www.baseball-reference.com) than Greg Maddux. Stieb threw four straight 200 inning seasons and then fell apart. If the Yankees can get 200 innings out of CC the next three years and have a fresh CC come October, they'd be in good shape.

I was wrong in my characterization of CC against the Sox - he hasn't sucked - in fact he's been very good; 3.91 ERA in 48.3 IP. But those numbers don't include the postseason; if you do, those go up to 5.06 in 58.6 innings. That looks a lot worse.

As for Wang, the problem he has is that he is incredibly dependant on infield defense. Jeter is a poor defender at best, Cano since losing Bowa has reverted to the lazy ways he had before. Teixeira is a fantastic defender, but first base isn't an important defensive position. A-Rod is very good but he's hurt and he's hurt in a way that will limit his effectiveness when he returns (hip injury). This is bad for Wang. The idea of BABIP is simply that the closer to .290 a pitcher has, the less amount of luck is going into their performance. Want had a .281 BABIP last year, so that's not too bad. In fact, his career is .287. I expect him to get a little worse this year, but not by much or of any fault of his own - the infield defense is going to get worse (Cody Ransom anyone?) and that's going to cause Wang some problems.

As for the line about Yankees getting high-priced players to win them championships since 2000.... well, how has that worked out since 2000?
dj lad 6:30 PM - 11 March, 2009
And thanks, uno seis. Sabrmetrics is a hobby of mine. I'm not even close to being the smartest guy in the room when it comes to them, but I try.
DJ d.range 6:35 PM - 11 March, 2009
LETS GO METS!!
uno seis 7:53 PM - 11 March, 2009
i can't wait to not watch Baseball Tonight this year. Thank god for MLB Network
dj lad 8:31 PM - 11 March, 2009
I know. I am so very happy for that.
DJ CISC0 9:11 PM - 11 March, 2009
Spoken as a true red sox fan....
The reason I said that about the Yankees was to give you an idea on how the front office has been thinking as of 2000. It's obvious that it hasn't been working. They think about the following year and rarely think about years ahead with regards to the high priced players.

Lad, I started to take you serious until I read "Jeter is a poor defender at best". Now, I know you must have all the stats on his errors and whatever (I seen them too because they had it in our NYPost). BUT Jeters bat makes up for his errors most of the time. See that's why I say don't count too much on those stats. Can you give me the stat on how many games the Yankees have lost due to his errors? Or what about the amount of hits he got THAT night/day when he did make the errors? Next you're going to tell me that Nomar's 2 golden gloves were more valuable than Jeter's 3.

Funny how all of Red Sax nation starting talking this "look at us now" as if you guys were used to winning championships all of these years. Be humble because it wasn't our fault it took the Sax 85+ years to win one.

See those stats on the amount of rings we have compared to the Red Sox (Yeah you knew that one was coming right)?...Stack up some more championships then we can take the red sox a little more serious.

Check these stats out:

Yankees= 26 Championship rings
Boston= 6 Championship rings (1918 they weren't even given rings or pins but a pocket watch...lol)Wasn't that the same cheap owner that traded Ruth to us?
joyofsox.blogspot.com

Yogi Berra has 10 rings by himself alone.
DJ d.range 10:03 PM - 11 March, 2009
Man, why do Yankee fans always wanna bring up rings??
Is that really all you have to cling onto?

Nobody can deny the Yankees glorious past, but nobody was talking about that, this discussion is geared to the 09 season, that's 2009, not 1909, and going foward, no chemistry = no ring... Just ask Tampa bay or the Knicks
uno seis 10:05 PM - 11 March, 2009
Quote:


Lad, I started to take you serious until I read "Jeter is a poor defender at best". Now, I know you must have all the stats on his errors and whatever (I seen them too because they had it in our NYPost). BUT Jeters bat makes up for his errors most of the time. See that's why I say don't count too much on those stats. Can you give me the stat on how many games the Yankees have lost due to his errors? Or what about the amount of hits he got THAT night/day when he did make the errors? Next you're going to tell me that Nomar's 2 golden gloves were more valuable than Jeter's 3.



consider why he said jeter was a poor defender. its because its going to affect wang, and he is one of the "horses" on the yanks pitching staff. there's no denying that he had some great offensive years, but his bat is also declining.
DJ d.range 10:06 PM - 11 March, 2009
Sorry, the Tampa bay/knicks comment refers to payroll... The knicks over the past few years have had some of the highest payroll in the NBA & TB has one of the lowest in MLB, but they had chemistry

BTW fuck the phillies(no blunt, love those)
dj lad 10:46 PM - 11 March, 2009
Quote:
Spoken as a true red sox fan....
The reason I said that about the Yankees was to give you an idea on how the front office has been thinking as of 2000. It's obvious that it hasn't been working. They think about the following year and rarely think about years ahead with regards to the high priced players.

This is true. So why do they continue to do that? Who was the last all-star the Yankees developed outside of Cano? Posada? Jeter? Rivera? That's really a bad sign when they all debuted in the early-to-mid-90s. The Red Sox developed Papelbon, Youkilis, Pedroia - that's just in last year's game. Or the Rays? Where do you even begin?

Quote:
Lad, I started to take you serious until I read "Jeter is a poor defender at best". Now, I know you must have all the stats on his errors and whatever (I seen them too because they had it in our NYPost). BUT Jeters bat makes up for his errors most of the time. See that's why I say don't count too much on those stats. Can you give me the stat on how many games the Yankees have lost due to his errors? Or what about the amount of hits he got THAT night/day when he did make the errors? Next you're going to tell me that Nomar's 2 golden gloves were more valuable than Jeter's 3.

Gold Gloves mean shit. Rafael Palmiero won a GG while playing 28 games in the field. It is a stupid award that has no merit. Jeter is, without a doubt, one of the worst defensive shortstops in baseball. The fact they moved a top quality defender to third for him is laughable. Errors are a bad stat since they are entirely dependant on perception - player A may get an error for doing the same thing as player B, who won't get one. I'd rather look at range factor (still a weak stat), UZR, or the +/- ratings done by the people at Fielding Bible. They rank Jeter as a -12 defender, which was 6th worse in baseball last year among SS. Look, Jeter has a good bat at this point but certainly not a great one. He's 35 years old, and he's already a poor defender. He's going to either have to move to the outfield (where he should have moved when A-Rod came over) or he's going to be a corpse by 2011. Jeter's problem isn't errors (although he commits many), it's that he has no range to his left or right. He's got a strong throwing arm but it's only mildly accurate. NOW, considering all of this, YES, he's a weak defender at best. He's still a 300/370/440 hitter, which is very good at shortstop, but he'd be far better served in center field with numbers like that. His range issues would be made nil (he's fast, he just doesn't have lateral range) and he could show off his arm.

Quote:
Funny how all of Red Sax nation starting talking this "look at us now" as if you guys were used to winning championships all of these years. Be humble because it wasn't our fault it took the Sax 85+ years to win one.

Yea, because those Yankees fans were SO humble chanting "NINE-TEEN EIGHT-TEEN". What comes around goes around.

Quote:
See those stats on the amount of rings we have compared to the Red Sox (Yeah you knew that one was coming right)?...Stack up some more championships then we can take the red sox a little more serious.

Check these stats out:

Yankees= 26 Championship rings
Boston= 6 Championship rings (1918 they weren't even given rings or pins but a pocket watch...lol)Wasn't that the same cheap owner that traded Ruth to us?
joyofsox.blogspot.com

So? How many of those were you alive for? Or your father? I don't talk up the Celtics because they won a bunch of titles in the 50s and 60s. I wasn't around for it. Are you really bragging about something that happened in the 1920s? Just think. "COUNT THAAA RINGGGZZZZ" is just about the dumbest argument ever to make.
dj lad 10:47 PM - 11 March, 2009
GG is entirely a reputation position. There's a reason why the same 6-7 guys win it every year. It is much harder to win a first gold glove than a second one.
dj lad 10:48 PM - 11 March, 2009
As for chemistry, while I think it's important, I think it's overrated.

You know how to do get great clubhouse chemistry? Win fucking baseball games. You win games, your team will be happy as a pig in shit.
DJ CISC0 11:19 PM - 11 March, 2009
Quote:
GG is entirely a reputation position. There's a reason why the same 6-7 guys win it every year. It is much harder to win a first gold glove than a second one.


OK so Ozzie Smith's 13 consecutive GGs as a SS meant nothing then huh? It was just one huge popularity contest...Come on! How can you say that Jeter should've moved to the outfield?....Now you have really gone mad! LOL...Did I miss something or didn't AROD played that position like a champ considering he never played there before. Cal Ripken adapted well so why can't A-Rod?

I was actually alive for 6 Championships and my pops was around for 10...What about you? Oh wait!

Bragging about rings doesn't mean anything either then right? You do know that they have the most championships than any other team in any other sport right? But that means nothing though...LOL

And the reason they keep signing big bats for these huge ass contracts beats the hell out of me. That's the Steinbrenner way and I don't see that changing anytime soon. Any team with money like the Yanks will do the same. Hell, now that the Sox got a little cash I see them doing the same thing the last few years.

Our problem hasn't been winning games....we win the right amount of games to get us to the playoffs. It's winning THOSE games that killed us. That has nothing to do with chemistry dude. Apparently we have enough chemistry to take us to the playoffs.

Range: Don't get me started on the Mets :)
uno seis 11:43 PM - 11 March, 2009
Quote:

OK so Ozzie Smith's 13 consecutive GGs as a SS meant nothing then huh? It was just one huge popularity contest...Come on! How can you say that Jeter should've moved to the outfield?....Now you have really gone mad! LOL...Did I miss something or didn't AROD played that position like a champ considering he never played there before. Cal Ripken adapted well so why can't A-Rod?


The point he was making is that Jeter should have been the one to move to 3rd base because at the time, A-Rod was the better defensive shortstop. I don't mean to keep standing up for dj lad, but I get so irritated by all the Jeter fanboyism in the media haha
DJ CISC0 12:15 AM - 12 March, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
Spoken as a true red sox fan....
The reason I said that about the Yankees was to give you an idea on how the front office has been thinking as of 2000. It's obvious that it hasn't been working. They think about the following year and rarely think about years ahead with regards to the high priced players.

This is true. So why do they continue to do that? Who was the last all-star the Yankees developed outside of Cano? Posada? Jeter? Rivera? That's really a bad sign when they all debuted in the early-to-mid-90s. The Red Sox developed Papelbon, Youkilis, Pedroia - that's just in last year's game. Or the Rays? Where do you even begin?


Yep Posada, Jeter, Rivera gave us 4 WS rings in 5 years....Your point was?

UNO- I'm not a Jeter fanboy I just had to disagree with him on that point. I agreed to most of the stuff he said but his obvious hate for the Yanks is messing with his frame of thinking. Jeter is declining in his defense at 35! When was he allowed to start declining? 45, 55 maybe?
dj lad 7:35 AM - 12 March, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
GG is entirely a reputation position. There's a reason why the same 6-7 guys win it every year. It is much harder to win a first gold glove than a second one.


OK so Ozzie Smith's 13 consecutive GGs as a SS meant nothing then huh? It was just one huge popularity contest...Come on! How can you say that Jeter should've moved to the outfield?....Now you have really gone mad! LOL...Did I miss something or didn't AROD played that position like a champ considering he never played there before. Cal Ripken adapted well so why can't A-Rod?

I was actually alive for 6 Championships and my pops was around for 10...What about you? Oh wait!

Bragging about rings doesn't mean anything either then right? You do know that they have the most championships than any other team in any other sport right? But that means nothing though...LOL

And the reason they keep signing big bats for these huge ass contracts beats the hell out of me. That's the Steinbrenner way and I don't see that changing anytime soon. Any team with money like the Yanks will do the same. Hell, now that the Sox got a little cash I see them doing the same thing the last few years.

Our problem hasn't been winning games....we win the right amount of games to get us to the playoffs. It's winning THOSE games that killed us. That has nothing to do with chemistry dude. Apparently we have enough chemistry to take us to the playoffs.

Range: Don't get me started on the Mets :)

Ozzie Smith is arguably the best defender in baseball history, maybe outside of Brooks Robinson. But guys who play 28 games at the position win it too. That's a HUGE credibility issue regarding the award. Writers get lazy and vote the same guys every year - they're fucking sportswriters, laziness is their #1 priority.

So what if your Dad was alive for 10? What point does this have on anything? What I'm saying is that making a "COUNT THE RINGZZZZZZZZZZZZ" argument is pretty much the most childish thing you can do when talking sports. It detracts from the actual flow of discussion. Luis Sojo has more rings than Barry Bonds and Ted Williams combined. Does that make him a better player? Hell, Derek Jeter has more rings than those two combined - does that make HIM a better player? Absolutely not.
dj lad 7:40 AM - 12 March, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Spoken as a true red sox fan....
The reason I said that about the Yankees was to give you an idea on how the front office has been thinking as of 2000. It's obvious that it hasn't been working. They think about the following year and rarely think about years ahead with regards to the high priced players.

This is true. So why do they continue to do that? Who was the last all-star the Yankees developed outside of Cano? Posada? Jeter? Rivera? That's really a bad sign when they all debuted in the early-to-mid-90s. The Red Sox developed Papelbon, Youkilis, Pedroia - that's just in last year's game. Or the Rays? Where do you even begin?


Yep Posada, Jeter, Rivera gave us 4 WS rings in 5 years....Your point was?

UNO- I'm not a Jeter fanboy I just had to disagree with him on that point. I agreed to most of the stuff he said but his obvious hate for the Yanks is messing with his frame of thinking. Jeter is declining in his defense at 35! When was he allowed to start declining? 45, 55 maybe?

Oh, Jesus. The point is that those three came up over a decade ago. Have you noticed a correlation between the lack of postseason success and a lack of young homegrown players? The best way to win championships in baseball is to grow you own talent and surround it with solid free agents or to trade that talent for players you can control for a long time, either through arbitration or a deal that buys out arbitration and a few free agent years.

The sad part is that while I hate the Yankees, I also really enjoy watching guys like Derek Jeter play. He's a solid ballplayer and a real positive role model for young players. That doesn't change that he hasn't been a good defender in his entire career. I'm not hating on him; I'm simply stating exactly what the facts are - he gets to far less balls hit at him than most players at his position, and when he DOES get there he commits a lot of errors; this isn't hyperbole that I'm spouting here. The problem is that he's declining from being a minus defender to being a minus-minus one and that's a HUGE issue.
tig ol' bitties 2:28 PM - 12 March, 2009
+1 Lad..

Jeter has slowly been declining on both the offensive and defensive side...while he doesnt strike out that much, he def has lost the pop he used to once have...
Defensively he's almost as big of a liablity as Lugo is and for a "superstar" thats a pretty big issue...

Also, on the closer front...If Papelbon can develop his splitfinger and use it more effectively, he will be the closer everyone is scared of. K-Rod has his change up and a crazy fastball...which is part of the reason he has such success...Rivera has his Cutter and throws and occassional off speed slider, but with his age he's getting more and more hittable...

Papelbon is still on the come up as a closer and over the next 3 seasons I can easily see him shattering K-Rods saves record in a single season by at least 5 saves.
uno seis 2:33 PM - 12 March, 2009
the saves record is a bunch of crap, nobody should be worried about trying to break it
tig ol' bitties 2:37 PM - 12 March, 2009
I dont think he'll be worried, im just sayign I think his talent level and abilities he will be virtually unhittable over the next few seasons...as he pretty much has been
DJ CISC0 5:53 PM - 12 March, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
See those stats on the amount of rings we have compared to the Red Sox (Yeah you knew that one was coming right)?...Stack up some more championships then we can take the red sox a little more serious.

Check these stats out:

Yankees= 26 Championship rings
Boston= 6 Championship rings (1918 they weren't even given rings or pins but a pocket watch...lol)Wasn't that the same cheap owner that traded Ruth to us?
joyofsox.blogspot.com

So? How many of those were you alive for? Or your father? Just think. "COUNT THAAA RINGGGZZZZ" is just about the dumbest argument ever to make.


You asked me how many we were around for so I answered your question. Don't get upset when you hear COUNT DA RINGZZZZZZZZ! because it's a fact so live with it...LOL. No seriously, Boston would NEVER rub that into our faces if it was the other way around right? Thank God that would never happen.

Seriously, you bring up good points that I can't argue with but you came across as a big hater trying to discredit the team as a whole.

Can't type out everything I want to say today...busy at work but I'll be back :)


Cody Ransom FTW !!
tig ol' bitties 6:34 PM - 12 March, 2009
The whole "count the rings" issue to me is retarded.

Baseball is a totally different game now (last 15) years or so then it was back then in the 30's, 40's and 50's when they dominated the game...1996, 1998-2000 are the only rings I count in this arguement...So in retrospect The Sox have 2 rings in the last 15 years Yankees have 4. Big whoop.

Its like bringing up the Celtics championships and rubbing it in Lakers/Cavs fans faces...makes no sense.
DJ d.range 7:28 PM - 12 March, 2009
get on the Mets, I know their history, they suck...again, this isn't a contest to see who's team has a more glorious past, i know, i know, nobody in sports can touch the yankees, fine.
just keep in mind, the discussion was about the '09 season, in which the yankees, mets & sox are on pretty even playing fields
tig ol' bitties 8:18 PM - 12 March, 2009
^ LOL, yeah now...then in the last month of the season METS will...































































FAIL, FAIL, FAIL...HAHAHA...sorry had to do it
DJ d.range 8:33 PM - 12 March, 2009
F U tig
slimmjimm 6:03 AM - 14 March, 2009
My takes:

It always seems that saying Jeter is a poor defender is a popular thing to say. Is he the most awesomest? I don't think anybody other than girls in pink #2 shirts says that, but he is at least more than adequate at the position.

The hoopla surrounding A-Rod seems to be dying down, and while you cant replace his production, it may be a good thing for him and the team to have him out of the picture for a bit.

I love how Sox fans easily dismiss Tex now that the Yankees signed him, when everyone knows there would have been a circle jerk on Yawkey Way if the Sox signed him, and he would be the bestest at everything. Sox fans, please note, I was disappointed when we signed him too, just for the fact I have to hear about the salary thing.

As far as Paps and Mo, I still think overall Mo wins, but Pap is a huuge difference maker, you guys are lucky, when Mo's career is over all of the Joba should be a starting pitcher crew (myself included) will have wished he stayed in the pen. Same thing with Pedroia, if Cano doesn't shape up, you guys have the instant better 2nd baseman.

I'm too tired to type anymore, I'll check back in, I love to talk Yanks/Sox. Gotta call up Comcast for my yearly April cable connection, hopefully this year I won't be able to cancel it so early .
dj lad 7:04 PM - 14 March, 2009
It's not trendy. It's fact. Look, you can either use your eyes or you can look at the numbers. Fielding is a very hard thing to judge with your eyes because there isn't set percentages like batting average or ERA. A guy can make a few spectacular plays during the year, get on sports center, but have awful range and a bad arm, and still win Gold Gloves. Once that happens, they get called "elite defenders", which is hilarious. Fielding analysis is by far the hardest thing to do in sabrmeterics, there's no question there. Every rating system comes out different and has it's strong points and weak points. But the simple fact is that Derek Jeter has poor range. Very poor. So he gets to far less balls than most defenders. If money and ego weren't a fact, Jeter would have been in center field five years ago when A-Rod came over and Bernie was seriously declining.

The A-Rod hoopla will come back once he's healthy again. Trust me on that one. That guy is a walking circus.

I never dismissed Teixerira. Guy is a top defender and a plus plus bat. He immediately makes the infield defense better. I was disappointed to see the Red Sox could not sign him.

Pedroia is already a far better second baseman, both defensively and offensively, than Cano. It's not a "if Cano doesn't shape up" kind of situation, Pedroia is already a far better player simply because he plays very good (not Gold Glove though) defense and his isoOBP is about 20 points higher than Cano's. Basically that mean that Cano is more dependent on his average to get on base. This means that if he isn't hitting .320 or so and instead hits .280, his OBP is only around .310, which is god awful. Cano has more power and more potential as a hitter but he has such poor plate discipline and since Larry Bowa left town, he's regressed in the field and at the plate significantly.

Mo's the best ever. Nuf ced.
slimmjimm 8:09 PM - 14 March, 2009
Never said Jeter was an elite defender, I just stated that he's more than adequate at the position. I will agree that He probably should've went to CF in 04 Bernie fell off in 03, and I'm a huge Bernie fan. Yes Jeter makes some great plays, and yes his range is poor, we can agree on that.

Not really all to sure on the A-rod bit. He is a walking circus, but the attention has died down, and with him being out again, it will die down more. I think if he had the big surgery he needs and was out the season (or most of it) he wouldn't be the 800 pound gorilla. That's just my opinion. But, he is the highest payed player in the game so he is always going to attract attention, and the Yankee brass isn't ready to mail in the season with the new stadium opening. You have to take the good with the bad with him, he is still a great player.

The Teixerira thing was just a general statement from what I have heard from more than a few Boston fans, and with A-roid out, we need his bat in the lineup, badly.

You basically reiterated what I said between Cano and Pedroia. Cano needs plate discipline, like right now. Cano has a noticeable amount of fielding problems, but both he and Pedroia are pretty similar in the field, Pedroia has him (and the league) on FP in 08 with a comparable amount of games, but Cano has more PO, DP's, and assists. It's all about taking the good with the bad in the field (see Derek Jeter) Batting is where I meant that you would have an instant better 2nd baseman. If Cano can get his act together, like you said, he has more potential as a hitter.

BTW, how do you think Tek and Lowell will do for you guys this year?
dj lad 9:28 PM - 14 March, 2009
No. He's not more than adequate. By every single metric other than Gold Gloves, he's a severely subpar defender. He shouldn't be playing the position.
dj lad 9:41 PM - 14 March, 2009
Oops, hit post too soon.

A-Rod was a circus last year with the divorce, hanging with Madonna, and everything else. He was a circus when he opted out of his contract during the 7th inning of Game 4 of the World Series. He was a circus during his contract negotiations (both times). He has ALWAYS attracted a circus. NOW, he's been caught for steroid use and in _every town he travels to, people will let him know what they think_. This circus hasn't even BEGUN. Great player or not, he's a lot of trouble.

Cano has shown no signs of developing plate discipline in his four years in the majors, which is a big, big problem. He's a career minus WPA player which kind of suprised me (-1.62). Pedroia is a 3.03 career WPA player.

That said, all five major projection systems have Cano around .295/17/82, with an OBP of .335 and a SLG of .455. Pedroia is ranked around .305/13/70, with an OBP of .370 and a SLG of .450. I think they both match their projections, but if Cano can't improve his plate discipline beyond the 4.3% career walk rate, he could be in trouble.

I think Tek is a fucking corpse and I wish he wasn't on the team. I was so disappointed that they brought him back. Lowell I'm not sure of. The injury he had was pretty bad and can take a long time to heal. He's also old. I think he probably ends up hitting something like 280/20/80, which is okay. His defense has declined a bit and should be worse this year thanks to the injury. I expect him to be a little better than average, but not worth his contract.
djbriguy 2:42 AM - 15 March, 2009
The sox only need to be ahead by the 6th inning and it's a wrap
DJ CISC0 5:07 PM - 16 March, 2009
Quote:

A-Rod was a circus last year with the divorce, hanging with Madonna, and everything else. He was a circus when he opted out of his contract during the 7th inning of Game 4 of the World Series. He was a circus during his contract negotiations (both times). He has ALWAYS attracted a circus. NOW, he's been caught for steroid use and in _every town he travels to, people will let him know what they think_. This circus hasn't even BEGUN. Great player or not, he's a lot of trouble.



If you call that a circus I can't imagine what you called Manny's BS while he was with Boston.

BTW...I wonder why the Yankees are the favorite 3:1 to win the World Series and Boston is 7:1. I guess those guys in Vegas don't look at stats and pick a team out of the air.
The Notourious B.K.S. 5:12 PM - 16 March, 2009
Quote:
Quote:

A-Rod was a circus last year with the divorce, hanging with Madonna, and everything else. He was a circus when he opted out of his contract during the 7th inning of Game 4 of the World Series. He was a circus during his contract negotiations (both times). He has ALWAYS attracted a circus. NOW, he's been caught for steroid use and in _every town he travels to, people will let him know what they think_. This circus hasn't even BEGUN. Great player or not, he's a lot of trouble.



If you call that a circus I can't imagine what you called Manny's BS while he was with Boston.

BTW...I wonder why the Yankees are the favorite 3:1 to win the World Series and Boston is 7:1. I guess those guys in Vegas don't look at stats and pick a team out of the air.


Or perhaps the bookies are setting the market looking for people to bet the yankee's b/c they have the broadest fan base? The Casino's are hurting, so you do the math.
DJ CISC0 10:49 PM - 16 March, 2009
^^^^
R i i i i i i ght! LOL
slimmjimm 1:51 AM - 17 March, 2009
As a Yankees fan, I can agree that Manny is a circus, nowhere near A-Rod, but he's getting closer. While Manny is an offensive power, he's a bum plain and simple. Alex had surgery, and was on a stationary bike soon after. Manny has been sitting around chasing paper, and is hurt....again. :rolleyes:
djbriguy 3:47 PM - 17 March, 2009
I'm just glad Manny took his drama elsewhere. But his circus in Boston wasn't nearly as bad as A-Roid. All Manny did was bitch about his contract and not show up to a few games/spring training.
DJ CISC0 4:46 PM - 17 March, 2009
Quote:
All Manny did was bitch about his contract and not show up to a few games/spring training.


You forgot a few things :

-The embarrassing dugout fight he had with Kevin Youkilis during a game.
-The physical altercation he had with the teams traveling secretary when he asked for 16 tickets while there were in Houston I think. Manny actually threw him down to the ground....He should've gotten slapped with a heavy fine and suspended by MLB IMO.
-When he asked to be taken out of the lineup right before a game with the Yankees.

That's not including:
- his unprofessional showboat act he puts on when he hits a HR, sloppy hair dos, extremely baggy uniforms, not running hard enough to first base because everything he hits to the outfield he thinks is out the park (so he usually has to settle for a single instead of a double).
uno seis 4:53 PM - 17 March, 2009
I'm not a dodger fan, but I end up going to dodger games and I gotta say Manny was a huge boost for the team last year and I look forward to watching him play this season
slimmjimm 10:46 PM - 17 March, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
All Manny did was bitch about his contract and not show up to a few games/spring training.


You forgot a few things :

-The embarrassing dugout fight he had with Kevin Youkilis during a game.
-The physical altercation he had with the teams traveling secretary when he asked for 16 tickets while there were in Houston I think. Manny actually threw him down to the ground....He should've gotten slapped with a heavy fine and suspended by MLB IMO.
-When he asked to be taken out of the lineup right before a game with the Yankees.

That's not including:
- his unprofessional showboat act he puts on when he hits a HR, sloppy hair dos, extremely baggy uniforms, not running hard enough to first base because everything he hits to the outfield he thinks is out the park (so he usually has to settle for a single instead of a double).



Yeah but he's still one hell of a cut-off man.
uno seis 10:51 PM - 17 March, 2009
lol
DJ d.range 2:17 AM - 18 March, 2009
Quote:
sloppy hair dos, extremely baggy uniforms


are you serious?
CMOS 5:46 PM - 18 March, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
sloppy hair dos, extremely baggy uniforms


are you serious?


^^ and he even leaves his sticker on his hat........disgraceful. lmao
DJ d.range 5:52 PM - 18 March, 2009
LOL
dj lad 6:30 PM - 18 March, 2009
Not everyone can have spit-shined helmets and a dress code like the Nazis.


Annnnnd I think that's Godwin's law being invoked.
DJ d.range 6:46 PM - 18 March, 2009
lol @ dress code like the nazi...kinda like Giambi's porno/hitler mustache
slimmjimm 7:17 PM - 18 March, 2009
It's not so much the dress code or spit shined helmets (did you ever see Posadas helmet, not exactly shining in Yankees glory)He does dress like a loaf. He's the only guy in the league that looks like he just got out of bed. There is no need for Sox fans to defend him now, and I wish Frank McCourt good luck. There are a lot of car shows and grills on the west coast.
DJ CISC0 12:20 AM - 19 March, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
sloppy hair dos, extremely baggy uniforms


are you serious?


Yes I am.

You're a pro athlete making millions of dollars so present yourself as one is all I'm saying.
DJ CISC0 12:21 AM - 19 March, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
sloppy hair dos, extremely baggy uniforms


are you serious?


^^ and he even leaves his sticker on his hat........disgraceful. lmao


HAHA
DJ d.range 4:09 AM - 20 March, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
sloppy hair dos, extremely baggy uniforms


are you serious?


Yes I am.

You're a pro athlete making millions of dollars so present yourself as one is all I'm saying.


you're also playing a game, rolling around in dirt & grass, spitting, chewing tabaccy, playing with your crotch, and slapping asses...

and if you win, you pour champagne all over everyone...real professional
btw, how is a millionaire supposed to look/dress?
DJ CISC0 4:54 PM - 20 March, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
sloppy hair dos, extremely baggy uniforms


are you serious?


Yes I am.

You're a pro athlete making millions of dollars so present yourself as one is all I'm saying.


you're also playing a game, rolling around in dirt & grass, spitting, chewing tabaccy, playing with your crotch, and slapping asses...

and if you win, you pour champagne all over everyone...real professional
btw, how is a millionaire supposed to look/dress?


OK, so why doesn't anyone else in the entire league dress or look like that? Name me another player who comes close.

I mean...he didn't even look like that when he was playing HS ball in Washington Heights! And that's the hood...LOL!
DJ d.range 5:03 PM - 20 March, 2009
do you remember lenny dykstra & wally backman??

and thats without even thing...
DJ d.range 5:03 PM - 20 March, 2009
*thing = thinking
DJ CISC0 5:09 PM - 20 March, 2009
Quote:
do you remember lenny dykstra & wally backman??

and thats without even thing...


Hell no....They don't even come close man. Not even the crazy blonde/orange haired bootleg Matsui that the Mets had a while ago...LOL.
The Notourious B.K.S. 5:14 PM - 20 March, 2009
John Kruk was a disgrace. Dudes helmet looked black, his uniform had mustard stains etc.
DJ d.range 5:45 PM - 20 March, 2009
correct me if i'm wrong, but aren't baggy shirts an attempt to get hit by more pitches?
CMOS 7:33 PM - 20 March, 2009
Nope its an attempt to hide the beer gut.
DJ d.range 7:43 PM - 20 March, 2009
this made me LOL, CMOS, you'll appreciate it
www.clubhousecancer.com
CMOS 8:04 PM - 20 March, 2009
hhahahahahaha.


I actually have inside dirt on an MLB player. I aint naming names on the internet but, we met this dude in Dominican Republic (hes not a dominican guy). Dude was bragging about roids and putting people on blast about using them. He was hanging with us all week smokin weed and doin coke, and taking extasy. I actually had to throw him out of our room a few times cuz he was geeked and annoying at 5am.


People idolize these guys like they are superheros, then get mad when they find out they are normal fucked up people.
DJ d.range 8:20 PM - 20 March, 2009
LOL, my boy went to motorcycle school in Orlando last year, some peeps out ther who he was hanging with chilled with one of the white sox(he doesn't remember who, he's not at all a sports fan), but he said he did maaaad coke with him and that this guy was buying maaad coke and sharin...he also said this guy would sneak onto golf courses to play
DJ CISC0 8:25 PM - 20 March, 2009
Quote:
hhahahahahaha.


I actually have inside dirt on an MLB player. I aint naming names on the internet but, we met this dude in Dominican Republic (hes not a dominican guy). Dude was bragging about roids and putting people on blast about using them. He was hanging with us all week smokin weed and doin coke, and taking extasy. I actually had to throw him out of our room a few times cuz he was geeked and annoying at 5am.


People idolize these guys like they are superheros, then get mad when they find out they are normal fucked up people.


That doesn't surprise me. I know a lot of connects in different hotels here in Midtown and Downtown so I here crazy stories when teams are in town. I heard shit like >insert players name here< likes to hang with nothing but men in his room. Another player gets drunk and pisses all over his room. Another player would ask concierge for locations of the gays bars etc...

I would like to know what player you're talking about though CMOS. It'll add to my list of dirt :)
DJ d.range 8:28 PM - 20 March, 2009
word cmos, start a pm with me & cisco & spill the beans, both of you...i'd love to shout homo slurs @ the opposing team, especially if its true
DJ d.range 11:59 PM - 1 April, 2009
Quote:
extremely baggy uniforms


www.flickr.com

just sayin...


and yes his yankee uniform is just as baggy
dj lad 1:28 AM - 2 April, 2009
To be fair he's pretty hefty and if he wore a tight uni we'd be seeing things we don't want to.
DJ CISC0 1:50 AM - 2 April, 2009
Quote:
To be fair he's pretty hefty and if he wore a tight uni we'd be seeing things we don't want to.


True!

I was actually thinking about how they will go about this. They might have him rock a size smaller though (no Sheffield) to see how it goes:)
DJ CISC0 11:05 PM - 9 April, 2009
Bump!

So the Yankees finally get their first win today in a major way. I can't believe some of the NY media here was already talking smack and ready to jump ship just after two games!

No wonder why a lot of players do so poorly when they play for the Yankees....they can't handle that shit!
dj lad 10:51 PM - 18 April, 2009
What did I say about Wang?
DJ TK 11:09 PM - 18 April, 2009
Wow my Indians owned the Yankees today. Also it looks like the Yankees greed has finally got to them considering it's 77 degrees here today and I saw a TON of empty seats
DJ CISC0 12:17 AM - 19 April, 2009
Quote:
What did I say about Wang?


What DID you say about Wang? No one in baseball could've predicted this type of pitching from Wang. 30 earned runs in 6 innings is just unheard of !
DJ CISC0 12:23 AM - 19 April, 2009
Quote:
Wow my Indians owned the Yankees today. Also it looks like the Yankees greed has finally got to them considering it's 77 degrees here today and I saw a TON of empty seats


I agree. The Yanks ARE sold out of the $100 and below seats but are having a really hard time trying to sell the "other" seats.
dj lad 8:10 AM - 19 April, 2009
I said that Wang was a candidate to regress due to his low K rate.

This is FUCKING REGRESSION TO THE MEAN right now. He will likely turn it around (after all, good pitchers don't typically go this bad this quick; the only one I can think of is Rick Ankiel (but that was something completely different)), but the Yankees can't keep using their bullpen for 8 innings every time he pitches; it will destroy their staff.

Just for kicks, it would take 36 SCORELESS INNINGS from Wang to get him to a 5.175 ERA. It will take him 46 to get him to 4.14.

That is awesomely hilarious. His ERA is like a good stock - it keeps going up!
DJ CISC0 11:28 PM - 19 April, 2009
Lad, I would agree with you but one CAN'T regress when ONE never had it from jump :)

His ERA is indeed some funny shit.
dj lad 5:21 AM - 20 April, 2009
He's regressing from the last few years.

I don't think that it's regresion or anything. I think he's just hurt or something.
dj lad 7:26 PM - 20 April, 2009
Fun fact:

This is quite likely the worst 3 start stretch ever. Nobody from 1954 forward (as far back as the b-ref streak finder goes) has had 2 starts in a row of <= 1 IP and >= 8 ER. Wang misses this because one of his outings was 1.1 IP. So for there to be a worse streak, someone would have to have come as close as Wang did there, with another 3 IP 7 ER tacked on before or after.
DVDjHardy 7:30 PM - 20 April, 2009
Wang is probably the only person pissed that Dontrelle Willis isn't pitching in the majors...LOL.
DJ CISC0 7:59 PM - 20 April, 2009
Quote:
Fun fact:

This is quite likely the worst 3 start stretch ever. Nobody from 1954 forward (as far back as the b-ref streak finder goes) has had 2 starts in a row of <= 1 IP and >= 8 ER. Wang misses this because one of his outings was 1.1 IP. So for there to be a worse streak, someone would have to have come as close as Wang did there, with another 3 IP 7 ER tacked on before or after.


That's amazing! Where did you find these facts?

Prediction-

Wang pitches a one hit shutout vs. Lester and BoSOx on Friday :)
DJ CISC0 8:00 PM - 20 April, 2009
Quote:
Wang is probably the only person pissed that Dontrelle Willis isn't pitching in the majors...LOL.


LOL!
Crickett 8:21 PM - 20 April, 2009
Quote:
Red Sox Pitching Staff > Yankee's Pitching Staff
Red Sox Bull Pen > Yankee's Bullpen

just sayin'



Red Sox/Yankees Pitching staff <Cubs Pitching staff
Red Sox/Yankees Bullpen < Cubs Bullpen


Have you seen Marmol Pitch? He's better than Papelbon.
DJ d.range 9:59 PM - 20 April, 2009
Quote:
Wang is probably the only person pissed that Dontrelle Willis isn't pitching in the majors...LOL.


what happened?

that kid was NIIIICE
dj lad 5:25 AM - 21 April, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
Fun fact:

This is quite likely the worst 3 start stretch ever. Nobody from 1954 forward (as far back as the b-ref streak finder goes) has had 2 starts in a row of <= 1 IP and >= 8 ER. Wang misses this because one of his outings was 1.1 IP. So for there to be a worse streak, someone would have to have come as close as Wang did there, with another 3 IP 7 ER tacked on before or after.


That's amazing! Where did you find these facts?

I, uh, looked it up on baseball-reference.com. I have a subscription there to use the Play Index too.

Quote:
Quote:
Red Sox Pitching Staff > Yankee's Pitching Staff
Red Sox Bull Pen > Yankee's Bullpen

just sayin'



Red Sox/Yankees Pitching staff <Cubs Pitching staff
Red Sox/Yankees Bullpen < Cubs Bullpen


Have you seen Marmol Pitch? He's better than Papelbon.

This simply is not true. Any of it. Well, the Cubs starters might be better than the Sox ones, but the Sox bullpen is absurd. They have five guys who could reasonably close on some teams (Paps, Okajima, Ramirez, Saito, Delcarmen). The Cubs have Gregg and Marmol... and their setup guy is Heilman who was horrible in big spots for the Mets. And Gregg has a career ERA of 4. Then it's Neal Cotts and Vizcaino. Look, the Cubs have a good bullpen but it's CERTAINLY not better than the Red Sox.

Carlos Marmol reminds me a lot of Octavio Dotel; we'll see how he does going forward.


Quote:
Quote:
Wang is probably the only person pissed that Dontrelle Willis isn't pitching in the majors...LOL.


what happened?

that kid was NIIIICE

His motion was hard to repeat; guys who have trouble with that have a hard time sustaining success in the majors.
dj lad 5:27 AM - 21 April, 2009
Here's the play-index link.

www.baseball-reference.com
tig ol' bitties 2:40 PM - 21 April, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
Red Sox Pitching Staff > Yankee's Pitching Staff
Red Sox Bull Pen > Yankee's Bullpen

just sayin'




Red Sox/Yankees Pitching staff <Cubs Pitching staff
Red Sox/Yankees Bullpen < Cubs Bullpen


Have you seen Marmol Pitch? He's better than Papelbon.


bahahaha...put them in the American League and see how good they are.

Yankees just arent good period. There pitching is mediocre at best. They have absolutely zero offense and the team chemistry is like below sea level.

I expect a healthy 3 game sweep this upcoming weekend.

Wang wont make it out of the 4th...Beckett will pitch a complete game 3 hitter and it will be laughable...

I said dont be surprised to see a 12 game winning streak by the sox very soon in the other thread...I think we have seen the start of it this past weekend :)
DJ CISC0 6:56 PM - 21 April, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Red Sox Pitching Staff > Yankee's Pitching Staff
Red Sox Bull Pen > Yankee's Bullpen

just sayin'




Red Sox/Yankees Pitching staff <Cubs Pitching staff
Red Sox/Yankees Bullpen < Cubs Bullpen


Have you seen Marmol Pitch? He's better than Papelbon.


bahahaha...put them in the American League and see how good they are.

Yankees just arent good period. There pitching is mediocre at best. They have absolutely zero offense and the team chemistry is like below sea level.

I expect a healthy 3 game sweep this upcoming weekend.

Wang wont make it out of the 4th...Beckett will pitch a complete game 3 hitter and it will be laughable...

I said dont be surprised to see a 12 game winning streak by the sox very soon in the other thread...I think we have seen the start of it this past weekend :)


Lmao!
DJ CISC0 6:57 PM - 21 April, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Red Sox Pitching Staff > Yankee's Pitching Staff
Red Sox Bull Pen > Yankee's Bullpen

just sayin'




Red Sox/Yankees Pitching staff <Cubs Pitching staff
Red Sox/Yankees Bullpen < Cubs Bullpen


Have you seen Marmol Pitch? He's better than Papelbon.


bahahaha...put them in the American League and see how good they are.

Yankees just arent good period. There pitching is mediocre at best. They have absolutely zero offense and the team chemistry is like below sea level.

I expect a healthy 3 game sweep this upcoming weekend.

Wang wont make it out of the 4th...Beckett will pitch a complete game 3 hitter and it will be laughable...

I said dont be surprised to see a 12 game winning streak by the sox very soon in the other thread...I think we have seen the start of it this past weekend :)


Were you drunk when you typed that?
tig ol' bitties 7:01 PM - 21 April, 2009
nope. perfectly sober.

lets just watch, maybe they might win one game by like a run, but I feel pretty confident predicting an easy sweep this weekend, even with Dice K out..

Papi is getting hot, which is a great thing cuz Youk isnt someone most people wanna mess with these days, so they will have to pitch to Ortiz and if he stays hot its on like donkey kong
DJ CISC0 7:32 PM - 21 April, 2009
You do know Wang isn't pitching due to the rain out last night right? If you remove Wang's 3 starts our pitching is doing a pretty good job.

Also, out of your whole pitching staff the only pitcher that would probably give us trouble as always will be Beckett.

Yanks take 2 of 3 in beantown. No 3 hitter, no 12 game streak, and for sure no sweep! You better hope Youk stays hot ALL YEAR..because once he's done with his hot streak it's a wrap!

I'm telling you all...it's going to be a different world without Manny...you'll see.

Oh yeah, you guys will be facing Joba, A.J, and PETTITTE....Holla!
DVDjHardy 7:43 PM - 21 April, 2009
Quote:
Joba, A.J, and PETTITTE


Time to add some Red Sox hitters to your fantasy lineup folks! :p
tig ol' bitties 8:42 PM - 21 April, 2009
hahahaha...

Joba is as scary as a fairy princess on Halloween.

AJ will be the only one that the Sox MIGHT have trouble with...although they have seen him umpteen times seeing he's always pitched in the AL East...and his last perforamance in spring training is in no way a dictation of how they will fair against him this weekend...

and Pettite? LMAO! refer to halloween comment.

Yanks will win one MAYBE...BIG BIG maybe. Sox are hot right now. we will see how they fair against Minn...They will prob take both games and be on a nice 6 game winning streak going into the weekend...

Youk is the only one that is really hot right now...wait until Pedrioa, Papi, and basically the middle of the order heats up...Sox avg right now is like 260 and thats solely due to Youk hitting like 480...once the team is in the zone like they were this past weekend they will be unstoppable...and once Dice-K is healthy...Lester that you saw on Sunday is the Lester you will for the rest of the season. Those first 2 games were just early year shits.

I cant wait to talk shit come next Monday :)
DJ CISC0 9:21 PM - 21 April, 2009
Quote:

I cant wait to talk shit come next Monday :)


We'll see..LOL....I'm sure lad will gather all the stats for us too :)

We'll, I'm about to jump on the D train to head to the stadium and watch my Yanks kick some A's ass. Giambi's return is going to be interesting.

I'll post some stadium pics tomorrow for the Red Sox heads so ya'll can salivate over our new stadium! HAHA.
tig ol' bitties 6:29 PM - 22 April, 2009
Id rather go to Fenway then Yankee Stadium any day of my life...lol
DJ CISC0 7:22 PM - 22 April, 2009
Stop hating tig.

The Stadium was amazing...I felt bad for the kid with the Papelbum jersey who was sitting in the bleachers though...LMAO! Those guys tore him a new one. I guess he didn't know that the alcohol ban was lifted this year for the creatures.

Damn CC just gave up the lead!
dj lad 9:02 PM - 22 April, 2009
Are you kidding? Yankee Stadium was a shithole. FIRST off, Yankee Stadium isn't the original YS. They tore it apart in the 70s and rebuilt it. So that place that closed wasn't "The house that ruth built" anymore.

Meanwhile, you now have a fucking circus park (4 more homers today!). Congrats. Good luck getting free agent pitchers to sign when they're guaranteed 16-20 home starts with an automatic 3-4 earned runs to begin.
uno seis 11:48 PM - 22 April, 2009
fucking yankees
DJ CISC0 3:25 AM - 23 April, 2009
Quote:
Are you kidding? Yankee Stadium was a shithole. FIRST off, Yankee Stadium isn't the original YS. They tore it apart in the 70s and rebuilt it. So that place that closed wasn't "The house that ruth built" anymore.

Meanwhile, you now have a fucking circus park (4 more homers today!). Congrats. Good luck getting free agent pitchers to sign when they're guaranteed 16-20 home starts with an automatic 3-4 earned runs to begin.


You are such a typical Boston hater my dude.

First of all I was talking about the NEW stadium that I went to last night. The old stadium was RENOVATED and NOT rebuilt. You guys ALWAYS have an excuse to hate...Stop the hate!

Second, Fenway can stay open until the end of man and STILL will NEVER come close to being a "Yankee Stadium" aka The Mecca. From historic Ali fights, Maris 61st HR, Reggie "Mr October", The ONLY perfect game in history with Larson, Gehrig's farwell speech, etc...I can go on and on. What did Fenway have? Old school scoreboards?...WOOOOOWWW!

Last... What Boston needs to do is stack some more money and rings and MAYBE they can get a park as fkin sweet as ours. The most laughable shit is the "Green Monster" seats (what a racket). $400-$500 to sit ABOVE the monster...Yeah great seats...LMAO! They knew exactly where to find the suckers to fall for that shit!

Go ahead and say that it's a homerun/wind tunnel effect that's happening but regardless, it's a benefit for BOTH teams if that IS the case. As proven in the past as it will in the future...no one in their right mind (including pitchers with starting ERAs of 3+) would ever choose to go to Boston over NY...That's just the way it is and that's the way it's going to always be so deal with it....so stfu with your hate already.
DVDjHardy 3:36 AM - 23 April, 2009
Quote:
As proven in the past as it will in the future...no one in their right mind (including pitchers with starting ERAs of 3+) would ever choose to go to Boston over NY...That's just the way it is and that's the way it's going to always be so deal with it....


Watchwww.youtube.com
DJ CISC0 3:56 AM - 23 April, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
As proven in the past as it will in the future...no one in their right mind (including pitchers with starting ERAs of 3+) would ever choose to go to Boston over NY...That's just the way it is and that's the way it's going to always be so deal with it....


Watchwww.youtube.com


Watchwww.youtube.com
DVDjHardy 4:05 AM - 23 April, 2009
LOL, really class...just like the Yankees ownership.

I'm not a Red Sox fan either, but they're certainly a lot more likeable. I live in one of the two best baseball cities in America - Detroit. The other one is St. Louis. NY, Boston and Chicago get a lot of hype from the media, but if you were to take a poll of the baseball players, they'll tell you how awesome the fans in DTW and STL really are.
dj lad 7:38 AM - 23 April, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
Are you kidding? Yankee Stadium was a shithole. FIRST off, Yankee Stadium isn't the original YS. They tore it apart in the 70s and rebuilt it. So that place that closed wasn't "The house that ruth built" anymore.

Meanwhile, you now have a fucking circus park (4 more homers today!). Congrats. Good luck getting free agent pitchers to sign when they're guaranteed 16-20 home starts with an automatic 3-4 earned runs to begin.


You are such a typical Boston hater my dude.

First of all I was talking about the NEW stadium that I went to last night. The old stadium was RENOVATED and NOT rebuilt. You guys ALWAYS have an excuse to hate...Stop the hate!

Second, Fenway can stay open until the end of man and STILL will NEVER come close to being a "Yankee Stadium" aka The Mecca. From historic Ali fights, Maris 61st HR, Reggie "Mr October", The ONLY perfect game in history with Larson, Gehrig's farwell speech, etc...I can go on and on. What did Fenway have? Old school scoreboards?...WOOOOOWWW!

Last... What Boston needs to do is stack some more money and rings and MAYBE they can get a park as fkin sweet as ours. The most laughable shit is the "Green Monster" seats (what a racket). $400-$500 to sit ABOVE the monster...Yeah great seats...LMAO! They knew exactly where to find the suckers to fall for that shit!

Go ahead and say that it's a homerun/wind tunnel effect that's happening but regardless, it's a benefit for BOTH teams if that IS the case. As proven in the past as it will in the future...no one in their right mind (including pitchers with starting ERAs of 3+) would ever choose to go to Boston over NY...That's just the way it is and that's the way it's going to always be so deal with it....so stfu with your hate already.

You are wrong on so many levels it's hilarious.

In the 1970s, the Boss tore down and rebuilt Yankee Stadium. YS as you saw it last year looked very little like the pre-construction. They played TWO SEASONS in Shea. For all intents and purposes, the YS from last year was only 25+ years old. And that's fine, but it's not the House that Ruth Built. Hell, even ESPN calls it "Yankee Stadium II", because it was simply a different park!

So fucking what if there was a fucking Ali fight there? That doesn't mean it's a good park. You did forget one thing that happened at Yankee Stadium - the greatest choke in sports history. I'm sure you remember that? 2004? October? Yeah. The slap heard round the world by A*Rod? Damon's grand slam? The Sox celebrating on your field? All that? Yeah.

The New Yankee Stadium is very nice, don't get me wrong. But they're pricing their fans out and have already announced ticket prices are going up next year.

Meanwhile, I don't think you understand what this wind-tunnel effect will have. Look at the Phillies/Rockies/Rangers - they all have money and can't bring in big free agent pitchers because they know their ERAs will inflate and their next contract will be less. You have a goddamn bandbox of a park that will cause Melky Cabrera to be the worst player to ever hit 25 homers in a season. Congrats.

As for the Monster seats... it costs $100 for a seat and $20 for standing room. Don't know where you're getting $400-$500! Your stadium is the one with $2,500 seats that aren't being bought up! THAT is a racket, champ.

Finally, as for pitchers choosing NY over Boston... that's just silly. What was the last big free agent pitcher to choose NY... Contreras? How'd that work out? What a bad argument you are making.
tig ol' bitties 1:17 PM - 23 April, 2009
Well like I said, they took 2 against the Twins have a 7 game winning streak going into the Yanks series...

this is gonna be good...

Lester vs. Joba in game 1 - Lester will shut the Yankees down...Joba will be out by the 4th.

AJ vs. Beckett - Pitchers duel type of game, expect Beckett to prevail...

Pettite vs. Masterson - Fossil vs. Fresh Fish - Im gonna take youth in this one..

hahaha...and there is my Red Sox fan boy prediction ;P
tig ol' bitties 3:16 PM - 23 April, 2009
PAPI PAPI PAPI!!

If young Joba Chamberlain misbehaves tomorrow night, he might face a spanking from someone else's Papi. With Chamberlain scheduled to start for the Yankees in the opener of a three-game series against the Red Sox, David Ortiz yesterday said the talented right-hander should avoid using Kevin Youkilis' head as a bull's-eye. "None of that, man -- just play the game the way it's supposed to be, and that's about it," Ortiz said, referring to Chamberlain. "This is a guy, as good as he is, the next step for him will be to earn respect from everybody in the league. He's not a bad guy, but when things like that happen, people get the wrong idea." Considering he has fired four pitches either near Youkilis' head or behind Youkilis in the last 20 months, Chamberlain quickly has emerged as a villain to Red Sox Nation in this rivalry.
DVDjHardy 3:20 PM - 23 April, 2009
I would love to see David Ortiz get in a brawl...that would be hilarious.
dj lad 5:50 PM - 23 April, 2009
I'll say the Sox take 2 of 3. A sweep would be nice, but I doubt it.
DJ CISC0 9:23 PM - 23 April, 2009
Quote:
LOL, really class...just like the Yankees ownership.

I'm not a Red Sox fan either, but they're certainly a lot more likeable. I live in one of the two best baseball cities in America - Detroit. The other one is St. Louis. NY, Boston and Chicago get a lot of hype from the media, but if you were to take a poll of the baseball players, they'll tell you how awesome the fans in DTW and STL really are.


LOL. I was going to post that clip to the next anti-Yankee and yours was next....bad timing I guess for you. So no offense.

Detroit is indeed an awesome baseball city...Kirk Gibson FTW!
DJ CISC0 9:27 PM - 23 April, 2009
Quote:
I would love to see David Ortiz get in a brawl...that would be hilarious.


Yeah...they'll start throwing all of our 60+ years old coaches and trainers to the ground. LMAO!

Don't let his size fool you...he's a softy who would most likely sit back and watch a fight rather then be in one.....Have you ever seen his cooking show? LOL
DJ CISC0 1:57 AM - 24 April, 2009
lad-

>sigh<

Do you think that I didn't know that we played at Shea for 2 years?? What's the point you're making here? I don't get it but if it makes Boston fans feel better then whatever. I don't even listen to the ESPN clowns either...they're a bunch of "know it alls" that really don't know shit. Let me guess...you ACTUALLY believe half the crap that Morgan preaches? LOL

The old stadium was renovated to the point where it CAN be looked at as "rebuilt" so whatever floats your boat. It was renovated on the same ground as the old one and not moved to another location. Even if it is the "new" "rebuilt" Yankee Stadium it still holds more history than Fenway. I mean the "new" YS (according to you) has just about the same amount of rings in "25+" years than Fenway's entire 97 years of existence!!! LMAO...What was your point again?

WOW! The Monster seats dropped THAT low???The last time I checked on the Monster seats was back in 03 when they first installed them so pardon if I wasn't keeping track...my bad.

+1 on Contreras
DJ d.range 6:36 AM - 25 April, 2009
Ummmmm...
dj lad 5:18 PM - 25 April, 2009
Quote:
lad-

>sigh<

Do you think that I didn't know that we played at Shea for 2 years?? What's the point you're making here? I don't get it but if it makes Boston fans feel better then whatever. I don't even listen to the ESPN clowns either...they're a bunch of "know it alls" that really don't know shit. Let me guess...you ACTUALLY believe half the crap that Morgan preaches? LOL

The old stadium was renovated to the point where it CAN be looked at as "rebuilt" so whatever floats your boat. It was renovated on the same ground as the old one and not moved to another location. Even if it is the "new" "rebuilt" Yankee Stadium it still holds more history than Fenway. I mean the "new" YS (according to you) has just about the same amount of rings in "25+" years than Fenway's entire 97 years of existence!!! LMAO...What was your point again?

WOW! The Monster seats dropped THAT low???The last time I checked on the Monster seats was back in 03 when they first installed them so pardon if I wasn't keeping track...my bad.

+1 on Contreras

Monster seats were never $500. Maybe from a scalper, sure. But I had first row Monster seats the first year they were available and they were $100.

I think Joe Morgan is an idiot. But it's a pretty well accepted fact that "Old" Yankee Stadium was completely rebuilt in the 70s, leading to most sports news agencies calling it "Yankee Stadium II". You don't have to accept that, but it's fact.

And stop it with the rings argument. That's the easiest way to make yourself appear ignorant. It's a piss poor argument that the mouthbreathers use.
dj lad 5:46 PM - 25 April, 2009
Back on topic, though.

I think last night really showed the difference in the two clubs; the Yankees offense is a bit better than the Sox, but the Sox defense and bullpen are MUCH, MUCH better.
slimmjimm 9:29 PM - 25 April, 2009
I wouldn't go as far as saying the Sox 'pen is MUCH, MUCH better, seeing as Rivera gave up the tying run. I think both pens did exceptionally well, unfortunately in the end, the Yankees pen was the one that faltered. I don't blame the bullpen at all, the offense had more than enough chances to score. On that note, Cano with a two run double off the monster!!!!!
djbriguy 12:34 AM - 26 April, 2009
well.... there's two games. Bernett looked sharp... for the first four innings :)

that was an awesome game today though.

I was at the bar for game 1, and there was a table of yankees fans, and a table of redsox fans (us). The owner of the bar is a huge redsox fan... when Bay hit the tying homer, the owner played "Ship Me Up to Boston", "Sweet Caroline" and "Dirty Water" back to back. This one yankees fan was pissed. I mean REAL pissed. He ended up going to the corner of the bar and warching the game by himself. When the ball came off Youk's bat in the 11th (hadn't even left the park yet) I ran over to him and screamed "GAME OVER! GAME OVER GAME OVVERRRRRRR!" and ran back to my seat. He got up and throw his chair across the room and was quickly thrown out of the bar. Hilarious
uno seis 12:42 AM - 26 April, 2009
what a game today
dj lad 3:09 AM - 26 April, 2009
You're telling me. I spent all day traveling and missed 90% of it, but Jesus. Wow.
slimmjimm 4:20 AM - 26 April, 2009
I really wish they were both in different divisions. I like the rivalry, but games like the last two are enough to cause a heart attack. It's too much for close to 20 games a season. Here's hoping Andy does his job.
dj lad 9:33 AM - 26 April, 2009
Or that the Jedi does his. :)
DJ CISC0 8:56 PM - 26 April, 2009
WOW. These were some crazy ass games. I thought the Yankees offense was better in game 1 but couldn't score with men on base. The Sox defense was indeed better also. BOTH bullpens for both games so far have been pretty bad.

Yesterdays game was a wild one but I couldn't watch most of it. All I have to say is thank God it's only April :)

I'm maaad tired so I won't too type much :)
DJ CISC0 2:12 AM - 27 April, 2009
+1 on the home steal! I can't remember when was the last time I saw that done live.

It's funny because I was watching the first game and I thought to myself "what if this dude actually tries to steal home plate".....nahhhhh.

I can't watch these games anymore because I have high anxiety as it is and I don't need this shit :) If this is how September ball is going to be then I won't be able to take it....

Props to to Blue Jays though for still staying on top of both our teams after all of this.

Anyone else sick of watching games on FOX and ESPN? OMG...I feel like muting my TV. The bullshit that these guys preach is amazing!
DJ d.range 3:30 AM - 27 April, 2009
For those who love to flaunt the Yankees glorious past... The red sox just won the tie breaker
DJ CISC0 3:53 AM - 27 April, 2009
Quote:
For those who love to flaunt the Yankees glorious past... The red sox just won the tie breaker


WTF are you doing in the "yankee thread" bro!?

Didn't Perez and the Mets get ROCKED by the NATS out of ALL teams?

Your STAR player (that I never bought into) David Wright is in the worst slump and has been fiening for a hit like a crack head :)

The Mets pitching and it's whole team has issues far beyong this thread. The Mets would actually LOVE to have the issues that Boston and The Yankees have right now.
I'm actually rooting for another SB World Series being that we both got new parks but it's not gonna happen. You guys need to bring Bobby V back or someone with a backbone that is NOT going to be bias based on someone's race....Yeah I said it!
DJ CISC0 3:56 AM - 27 April, 2009
BTW....I'm a little freaked out by tigs predictions :)
DJ CISC0 3:58 AM - 27 April, 2009
Quote:
The red sox just won the tie breaker


What "tie breaker" are you talking about Mr. Met?
DJ CISC0 3:59 AM - 27 April, 2009
4 posts in a row FTW!!!!! I'm tight! (no homo)
tig ol' bitties 1:30 PM - 27 April, 2009
I think I called that sweep, right? I did say that right? yah I think I did.

10 game winning streak, I did say they'd go on a 12 game winning streak like a week and a half ago right? I think so? Yah I did. :)

ESPN, if your hiring, please contact me via gmail. thanks
DJ d.range 4:59 PM - 27 April, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
The red sox just won the tie breaker


What "tie breaker" are you talking about Mr. Met?


They went into Sundays game with an even record against each other, like 400 somthing wins each, the sox are now up a game
DJ d.range 5:03 PM - 27 April, 2009
So the thread can be filled with Boston fans, but no mets fans. Yeah, they lost, and ollie sucks(i was against resigning him) but we didn't get swept....

Who's racist, jerry manual?
DJ CISC0 6:02 PM - 27 April, 2009
Quote:
So the thread can be filled with Boston fans, but no mets fans. Yeah, they lost, and ollie sucks(i was against resigning him) but we didn't get swept....

Who's racist, jerry manual?


Sorry I had to take it out on the Met :)

How far back are you going with the winning record? Overall the Yankees are 1108-927 against the Red Sox (going back to 1901).

People say the Omar Minaya only looks for hispanics for his team. It does look that way sometimes when I look at the team.
DVDjHardy 4:46 AM - 28 April, 2009
Sabathia < Verlander < Galarraga

Yankees are about to lose another series. Going to the game tomorrow...if it doesn't get rained out.
tig ol' bitties 1:23 PM - 28 April, 2009
Yankees are just terrible. Like BAD! No pitching (altho they spent, what, 250 million on it on the offseason) hahahahahahhaha
Offense is pitiful....

When the Sox fans scream "Yankees Suck" its never been more true!

Meanwhile, THE SOX have one 11 in a row, did I say 12? Im good.

Bay is having a better month then Manny, the offense is clicking...and this is without Papi playing well...everyone else is picking up the slack...feels good to be a Sox fan! :)
DJ d.range 12:02 AM - 29 April, 2009
maybe omar does pick hispanic players, but most of our hispanic players are pretty good

johan, reyes, beltran, delgado, k-rod(NOT perez, tho)


as far as the tie-breaker, that was a stat that they spit out during the 3rd game, but it was like 400-something wins each, maybe it was @ fenway?
DJ d.range 12:03 AM - 29 April, 2009
BTW, I,ve heard that before about omar, and i think that for the people saying that to notice, are racist(old white men who call sports talk radio)
dj lad 1:25 AM - 29 April, 2009
Quote:
BTW, I,ve heard that before about omar, and i think that for the people saying that to notice, are racist(old white men who call sports talk radio)

Look up what Delgado said about Minaya trying to appeal to him when he was a FA. Delgado was incensed that Minaya tried to appeal to his Latino side and almost refused the trade when he came over from the Marlins.
DJ CISC0 4:01 AM - 29 April, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
BTW, I,ve heard that before about omar, and i think that for the people saying that to notice, are racist(old white men who call sports talk radio)

Look up what Delgado said about Minaya trying to appeal to him when he was a FA. Delgado was incensed that Minaya tried to appeal to his Latino side and almost refused the trade when he came over from the Marlins.


I forgot about that!

I feel bad that DVDjHardy had to sit through that game tonight :)
Allan Trammell FTW!!! Right!?

@range- Look, I'm a hispanic PR/DR but even I can see what he's trying to do. Yeah the Mets have VERY good latino players but I think it's fucked up.

The Yankees were the last team in MLB to get a minority player (correct me if I'm wrong lad). I ALWAYS think about that shit when I go to a game or when I watch them play.

Trust me if the Rockies were only recruiting white players.....fans would've went nuts (no dale).

BTW lad- Fuck yo streak and yo couch LMAO!
Watchwww.youtube.com
DVDjHardy 12:27 PM - 29 April, 2009
I was faded by the 7th inning...it didn't matter! :p
DJ CISC0 8:31 PM - 29 April, 2009
Yankees finally dropped the prices on tickets.
www.nypost.com
dj lad 11:33 PM - 29 April, 2009
Red Sox were the last team to get a minority player. It was pumpsie green.

The Sox have a history of racism in the organization (which is thankfully over). The story goes that the Sox were once hosting a tryout for a bunch of players; this included the best Center Fielder of all time, Willie Mays. When Yawkey saw Mays on the field, he said "Get that ni**er off my field!"
DJ CISC0 2:53 AM - 2 May, 2009
What a game tonight! Lost the 4-0 lead only to win it with a 2 run GW single by Jorge. Cano extends his hitting streak to 18 gms and now has 34 hits for the season. He's clearly the hottest Yank (Swisher is second). Mark T NEEDS to start batting some hits (he's batting .189 WTF?).

lad: Didn't you say something like Cano is lazy due to Bowa leaving?

Just saying.....Youk is f*cking hot though...can't lie about that.
dj lad 10:12 PM - 2 May, 2009
I said he's lazy in the field.
DJ CISC0 8:56 PM - 4 May, 2009
I hope tonights game doesn't get rained out! We need to give back the sweep. Three in a row coming right up!
djbriguy 6:36 AM - 5 May, 2009
Quote:
I hope tonights game doesn't get rained out! We need to give back the sweep. Three in a row coming right up!


bad prediction... and i cant' believe yankees fans LEAVE the stadium because of a little rain. You'll never see that happen at Fenway.
tig ol' bitties 1:02 PM - 5 May, 2009
oops. looks like thats not happening.

YANKEES SUCK! They are over matched by the Sox Pitching and Offense.
DJ CISC0 7:04 PM - 5 May, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
I hope tonights game doesn't get rained out! We need to give back the sweep. Three in a row coming right up!


bad prediction... and i cant' believe yankees fans LEAVE the stadium because of a little rain. You'll never see that happen at Fenway.


Those empty seats you see on TV are for the big ballers who take their clients out to the games. They know shit about baseball. I would've left too...the weather was too shitty to play. They should've called the game if you ask me.
DJ CISC0 7:10 PM - 5 May, 2009
Quote:
oops. looks like thats not happening.

YANKEES SUCK! They are over matched by the Sox Pitching and Offense.


Boston pitching hasn't been that impressive dude. A few Ks last night and all of a sudden Boston pitching "overmatch"? C'mon.
tig ol' bitties 7:12 PM - 5 May, 2009
Exactly, they havent been impressive, yet still shutting down the Yankees..Dice-K isnt even in the rotation and Penny is all over the damn place...wait until they catch fire...might see multiple no hitters against the Yankees this season hahaha
tig ol' bitties 7:13 PM - 5 May, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I hope tonights game doesn't get rained out! We need to give back the sweep. Three in a row coming right up!


bad prediction... and i cant' believe yankees fans LEAVE the stadium because of a little rain. You'll never see that happen at Fenway.


Those empty seats you see on TV are for the big ballers who take their clients out to the games. They know shit about baseball. I would've left too...the weather was too shitty to play. They should've called the game if you ask me.


I read a story where it said Yankees staffers told fans the game was cancelled then wouldnt let anyone back in thru certain gates after tehy started playing
djbriguy 7:23 AM - 6 May, 2009
www.nydailynews.com

oh, and how sweep it is... again
tig ol' bitties 2:22 PM - 6 May, 2009
hahahaaaa...Yankees are just terrible..

Ellsbury and YOUUUUUUUUUUUK werent in the lineup either. Could we see a 19-0 vs the Yankees this year? We Might! ahahhahaa
DJ CISC0 4:11 PM - 6 May, 2009
The ONLY good thing about all of this is that it's still early in the season. I rather get all of this out the way now then in September :)
DJ d.range 9:06 PM - 9 May, 2009
i heard they were gonna rename the new stadium to FennwayII
DJ CISC0 6:33 PM - 22 May, 2009
Go ahead and act like you don't see a 15 game winning streak in the making.
dj lad 6:41 PM - 22 May, 2009
I don't see a 15 game winning streak in the making. Nice streak so far, though.
DJ CISC0 3:47 AM - 23 May, 2009
Damn, I knew I shouldn't have posted anything because of the jinx but it's all good.

Side note---I would never ever root for the Mets but during this series I will. That's how much I hate the Red Sox :) There you go range...I'm on your side for this series ONLY...lol
DVDjHardy 4:12 AM - 23 May, 2009
You know who has a streak going? The fucking Tigers!
DJ d.range 6:40 PM - 24 May, 2009
We about to sweep!!
dj lad 7:33 PM - 24 May, 2009
A broken bat homer. Are you joking? How are they not ashamed of this park?
DJ d.range 8:05 PM - 24 May, 2009
C'mon. That park is part of the character of baseball, we need more parks like this!
dj lad 1:12 AM - 25 May, 2009
Uh what? Yankee Stadium is basically Arena League Baseball. We're looking to be on pace for 316 homers hit there this season; that's twice what was hit in old Yankee Stadium.

Character is ivy walls like at Wrigley; it's the hill in center field in Houston, it's Chavez Ravine and the sight lines beyond the outfield. New Yankee Stadium has ZERO character.
DJ CISC0 1:29 AM - 25 May, 2009
Quote:
A broken bat homer. Are you joking? How are they not ashamed of this park?


First of all, t was hit to LEFT field dude and not right field (remember THAT'S the side where we control the wind tunnel thingy when we're up). You're acting like it was melky or swisher that hit that HR...IT WAS TEIXEIRA!!

Who cares what they are on pace to do? BOTH teams have an equal advantage to this so called wind effect that everyone claims is happening at right. Why can't you understand this?

PLUS, it's getting old so you should really drop it.
DJ CISC0 1:37 AM - 25 May, 2009
Quote:
Uh what? Yankee Stadium is basically Arena League Baseball.
New Yankee Stadium has ZERO character.


And you say this because of the nice pictures that you've seen on the net? Or something some Boston writer wrote in his column? Because I know I wouldn't make a comment like that without ever stepping foot in the new park.

Don't be another typical red sox hater.
DJ d.range 5:45 AM - 25 May, 2009
Citi field> new Yankee stadium
dj lad 12:14 AM - 28 May, 2009
CISC0, its still 80+ homers in 20+ games. I don't know how any fan can be happy that's happening. It's going to be a major disadvantage to the Yankees going forward - no pitcher is going to want to sign there when it's a horrible place to pitch. I know both teams get to hit there, but it's Arena League Baseball - how can any fan be happy watching 10-8, 11-7, 9-6 games all the time. It's bad for your team as you have to burn through pitchers. Go look at what the Rockies had to deal with - sure, both teams got to use that park for power, but what it did net them, even when they spent $200M on free agent pitching? Nothing - at least until they kept balls in a humidor and changed the dimensions of the park.

It's bad baseball, CISC0, that's what you keep overlooking.

Yes, it was to left field, but the whole stadium is playing like a little league ballpark. I don't read Boston sportswriters because as a whole (other than Chad Finn) they suck.

The place is gorgeous. No one is denying it. But they're effectively priced out tons of fans and the place is dripping with corporate greed. One writer called it "A Monument to Excess". That seems appropriate.

So, congrats. You have a ballpark that nearly everyone (including many Yankee fans I know) think is a joke. Enjoy having starters go 4 innings before getting knocked out and having to carry 13 pitchers on your staff, including 2 long men, just to get to the 7th inning.
dj lad 12:19 AM - 28 May, 2009
The interesting thing is that while homers are up HUGE at NYS, all of this ease to hit a homer has made it really hard to hit a double - it's the 3rd hardest place to hit a double this season. This will also make it harder to hit a triple as well - but the park factors on this are in WAYYY too small a sample size.
DJ d.range 5:10 PM - 28 May, 2009
+1 on low scoring games... i watched Johan win a 1-0 game against the phillies @ citi-field last month

On new Yankme Stadium...

I heard a story that in the very expensive seats, food is included with the ticket purchase, anyway, a fan was caught throwing ice cream sandwiches to the, ummmm, lesser fortunate seats. When he was told he couldn't do that he said "i paid X-amount of $$ for these seats, i can do whatever i want"
=)
DJ CISC0 4:37 PM - 29 May, 2009
The one thing you need to stop doing lad is comparing NYS (and the team) to other parks (and other teams). I think I said this before (scroll up somewhere) but, I can't see anyone turning down an opportunity to pitch for the Yankees because of this. There are too many factors to consider when choosing a team to play for (a winning team, farm system, major city where one can shine, media coverage, etc...).

It's bad baseball? I guess it depends who you ask right? I mean, I know a bunch of "real" New York Yankee fans and I've never heard it called a "joke".

I personally like watching high scoring games from time to time. I'd rather watch a low scoring game when both teams have a good starting pitcher. You have to remember, the average fan would rather watch offense than defense. That is what the owners and GMs would want the fans to watch (that's why there was a blind eye to steroid use).

+1 on the doubles and triples fact. You do know that an inside the park home run was already hit in our park right? yankees.fandome.com
DJ CISC0 4:45 PM - 29 May, 2009
Quote:
+1 on low scoring games... i watched Johan win a 1-0 game against the phillies @ citi-field last month

On new Yankme Stadium...

I heard a story that in the very expensive seats, food is included with the ticket purchase, anyway, a fan was caught throwing ice cream sandwiches to the, ummmm, lesser fortunate seats. When he was told he couldn't do that he said "i paid X-amount of $$ for these seats, i can do whatever i want"
=)


Johan is a pitcher I would like to watch in a low scoring game. But, the average fan would just fall asleep watching a low scoring game. Trust me GMs and owners would love to have balls flying out of the park because they know it will generate cash flow and more heads to the park.

LOL. I would've loved to see that. Those "box seat" people are always getting picked on anyway....
dj lad 7:06 PM - 29 May, 2009
Quote:
The one thing you need to stop doing lad is comparing NYS (and the team) to other parks (and other teams). I think I said this before (scroll up somewhere) but, I can't see anyone turning down an opportunity to pitch for the Yankees because of this. There are too many factors to consider when choosing a team to play for (a winning team, farm system, major city where one can shine, media coverage, etc...).

It's bad baseball? I guess it depends who you ask right? I mean, I know a bunch of "real" New York Yankee fans and I've never heard it called a "joke".

I personally like watching high scoring games from time to time. I'd rather watch a low scoring game when both teams have a good starting pitcher. You have to remember, the average fan would rather watch offense than defense. That is what the owners and GMs would want the fans to watch (that's why there was a blind eye to steroid use).

+1 on the doubles and triples fact. You do know that an inside the park home run was already hit in our park right? yankees.fandome.com

Inside the park home runs have nothing to do with a hitter and everything to do with misplaying the ball. Guys don't get inside the parkers on solidly hit, well played balls (except for like, Carl Crawford). Span completely overplayed the ball. That should have been a SINGLE, if not a double at the very worst.

The reason that guys won't go pitch there is because their NEXT contract will be a lot lower in value if their numbers are much higher as a result of pitching in NY. And when you can't get through the 5th inning, that's a black mark on your record. Don't get me wrong; I think they will still sign plenty of pitchers - they've got a lot of money and can pay people. But if it does turn out that NYS is Coors East... it's going to get very interesting to see what happens. That said, filling your staff with guys who get Ks and groundballs is a way to help offset the park.

I think watching 11-7 games that take 4 hours and have 11 pitching changes are bad baseball. The average fan doesn't want to sit for 4 hours either; in fact I'd argue that the average fan would like to see a 4-3, well-played, well-pitched game that lasts 2.5 hours than a slugfest that takes four.
DJ d.range 8:47 PM - 29 May, 2009
chicks dig the long ball =p

i agree with lad
DVDjHardy 11:24 PM - 29 May, 2009
Real baseball fans love watching 1-0 games!

And saying no pitcher will turn down the Yankees (and give up their shot at HOF) is like saying no DJ would turn down a gig to spin at Webster Hall to play a Soulja Boy medley.

Yeah, I went THERE!
DJ CISC0 2:54 AM - 9 June, 2009
Quote:
Real baseball fans love watching 1-0 games!

And saying no pitcher will turn down the Yankees (and give up their shot at HOF) is like saying no DJ would turn down a gig to spin at Webster Hall to play a Soulja Boy medley.

Yeah, I went THERE!


I'm not sure about that! You know you'll spin at Webster Hall and play Swag On...LOL
DJ CISC0 2:57 AM - 9 June, 2009
OK so the Sox/Yanks series is about to go down. 2/3 for the Yanks. I wonder how many HRs Ortiz will hit in this "arena league circus park"? Oh wait!

For the subway series (Mets/Yanks)..........Yanks sweep. Sorry range it's real talk.
DJ d.range 3:13 AM - 9 June, 2009
*waits for Mon.*
DVDjHardy 3:24 AM - 9 June, 2009
Haha, yeah right!

I love inter-league play though...nice to see some teams that we don't see all the time.
DJ CISC0 3:37 AM - 9 June, 2009
Quote:
*waits for Mon.*


By then we'll be playing your backups backups :)
dj lad 6:16 AM - 9 June, 2009
6 more home runs tonight at the Toilet.

I don't know how many homers Ortiz will hit (likely none), but it's still Arena League Baseball at Yankee Stadium III!
dj lad 6:17 AM - 9 June, 2009
Oh wait, it's at Fenway Park. That means no one will hit a homer during Arena League Baseball at Yankee Stadium these next 3 days.
DJ d.range 6:52 AM - 9 June, 2009
yo i heard a-rod bunted a home run last nite
DJ CISC0 1:51 PM - 9 June, 2009
Quote:
6 more home runs tonight at the Toilet.

I don't know how many homers Ortiz will hit (likely none), but it's still Arena League Baseball at Yankee Stadium III!


Yep 4 of them were to right by Yankee players. For some reason I thought we were hosting....whatever...we are still taking 2/3.

LOL @ range!
dj lad 3:12 PM - 9 June, 2009
Sorry 5 more homers, not 6.
DJ CISC0 4:06 PM - 9 June, 2009
There goes your chances of ever winning again....LOL

www.nypost.com
dj lad 6:04 PM - 9 June, 2009
OH NOOOOOOO

Hahaha that's great.
DJ CISC0 2:47 PM - 10 June, 2009
OK, now that we got that one out the way :)
The Notourious B.K.S. 4:52 PM - 10 June, 2009
bad news yankee fans, dude planted the same type of seeds we use. Sabotage FAIL, and in case you missed it:

nbcsports.msnbc.com
DJ CISC0 7:33 PM - 10 June, 2009
Quote:
Sabotage FAIL


No, the seeds he used only prevents WS wins that's all. It said so on the back of the packaging.
djbriguy 8:12 AM - 12 June, 2009
i know both teams will be there in the end..... but i gotta say it. SOX ARE 8-0 against the yanks in 2009!! :P
DJ CISC0 1:42 PM - 12 June, 2009
^^^Yep. Straight owned this year by them. Props to them. They still suck :)
DJ CISC0 2:57 AM - 13 June, 2009
OMG!!!!!!!

He DROPPED it!!!!!!!!


LMAO!!!


Sorry range :(
DJ d.range 2:58 AM - 13 June, 2009
man, you don't was no time kid
DJ d.range 2:58 AM - 13 June, 2009
*waste
DJ CISC0 2:59 AM - 13 June, 2009
Yeah I was going through some music on my laptop...lol. I think I just woke my daughter up too.LOL
DJ CISC0 3:01 AM - 13 June, 2009
Quote:
man, you don't was no time kid


You too! :)
DJ CISC0 10:26 PM - 14 June, 2009
Man, what a beating Santana took. He did a Wang out there today. (no misquote)
dj lad 6:22 AM - 16 June, 2009
8-0
DJ CISC0 4:42 PM - 16 June, 2009
I just took a $100 dollar bet with my barber that the Yankees end up getting farther than the Sox.

Money in the bank for me.
DVDjHardy 5:51 PM - 16 June, 2009
Quote:
I just took a $100 dollar bet with my barber that the Yankees end up getting farther than the Sox.

Money in the bank for my barber.


fixed.
dj lad 7:39 AM - 17 June, 2009
Seriously. That's dangerous. The Red Sox have played the toughest schedule in baseball this year and are in a stretch where they played three straight first place (or the Yankees) teams and went 9-3.
DJ CISC0 6:18 PM - 17 June, 2009
Quote:
Seriously. That's dangerous. The Red Sox have played the toughest schedule in baseball this year and are in a stretch where they played three straight first place (or the Yankees) teams and went 9-3.


The toughest schedule in baseball!??? According to who? You?

It's called a hot streak dude...take it easy there. Everyone knows it's the scrubby teams that'll get you.

On a side note: Is anyone surprised that Sosa juiced in 03? I mean why is this news?
dj lad 7:29 AM - 18 June, 2009
No.
It's the toughest schedule in baseball based on... this:

sonsofsamhorn.net

Yes, it's a Red Sox website. But you can't argue with numbers. That said, four of the five toughest schedules in baseball are in the AL East - that's what comes with being in the best division in the game.

CISC0, I got nothing but love for you, bro, but when have I ever said something that wasn't, at the very least, backed up with statistical evidence?
DJ CISC0 4:35 PM - 18 June, 2009
Quote:
No.
It's the toughest schedule in baseball based on... this:

sonsofsamhorn.net


WOW. As soon as I figure this shit out I'll reply back :) Just glancing quickly it looks like this formula is a mixture of stats and chance? I'll take a closer look during lunch LOL.

I asked the question because I always hear the term "tough schedule" but never really thought about how one can determine if in fact a schedule is "tough".

And for the record, you never backed up your YS right field wind tunnel theory :)
dj lad 5:48 PM - 18 June, 2009
There's no chance - it's called "karma", and it's based on the simple idea of the law of averages. For example, on average, major league baseball pitchers give up a BABIP (batting average on balls in play) at a .300 clip. It will vary between 280-320 generally. So if a guy has a .220 or .400 BABIP, that means he's either getting very lucky or very unlucky. Sometimes its not luck - like when a guy is getting tattooed repeatedly, but 99% of the time, it's luck. That shit evens out. It's "karma".
DJ CISC0 3:53 AM - 29 June, 2009
SWEEP!

Mo gets his 500th save!

How the hell does KRod walk Mo for a run? LMAO! I'll never see the 2 best closers going at it like that ever again.
dj lad 5:02 AM - 29 June, 2009
The Mets are fucking awful.

AWFUL.

And K-Rod is not a top 5 closer in baseball. Here's 5 I'd take over him in a cocaine heartbeat:

Rivera
Papelbon
Nathan
Bell
Broxton

Here's 5 more I'd take over him.
Fuentes
Lidge (when his head is straight)
Street
Soria
Cordero

Any closer in K-Rod's position could have set the saves record last year - saves is such an overblown statistic. Meanwhile, he's walked 22 guys this year! 22!!! AS A CLOSER!! That's a HORRIBLE HORRIBLE thing. He's walked the most guys for any reliever in baseball outside of Carlos Marmol. I'd rather have Brian Bruner close for me than Rodriguez. Guy is a fraud.
dj lad 5:03 AM - 29 June, 2009
I was rooting for Mo to get a hit there, but the walk was just so much fun.
slimmjimm 3:27 PM - 29 June, 2009
I agree, K Rod is overrated, and to be honest, I'm surprised his arm hasn't literally fallen off yet. I would never want to be his pitching coach, I would have nightmares about his mechanics.

There is also no excuse for walking an A.L pitcher with less than a handful of career AB's.
DJ CISC0 4:41 PM - 29 June, 2009
^^^^Agree.

To the Mets defense, they are playing with a minor league "like" team. I was really surprised they even kept the scores respectable (except the second game). One thing is for sure though...their season looks so done. I kind of feel bad for them...LOL

I don't know what's going on with K-Rod all of a sudden. One can not just lose THAT much talent in such a short period of time.
DJ CISC0 4:46 PM - 29 June, 2009
WOW. With the exception of the Dodgers...I really can't believe how bad the National League is.
dj lad 6:08 PM - 29 June, 2009
The Dodgers aren't even that good. They're playing in the worst division in baseball (and it's not even close). Put the Blue Jays in the NL West and they're in first place.
DJ d.range 1:06 AM - 30 June, 2009
take away your 2 & 3 starting pitchers, your leadoff hitter, and your 3 & 4 hitters from ANY team, and they will be in the same situation as the mets...
dj lad 4:31 AM - 30 June, 2009
The Mets are awful outside of that. Their manager CHOSE TO PITCH TO DEREK JETER INSTEAD OF RIVERA.

Now, granted, no one expected Rivera to draw a walk, but that's another story altogether.

They went into the season with no backups or real plan, which is what happens when your GM is a joke. A good team - hell, look at the Red Sox - they lost (for all intents and purposes) their star hitter in Ortiz for the first two and a half months of the season. They lost an 18-game winner in Daisuke. They built depth in the rotation that is NINE PITCHERS DEEP!! (Lester, Beckett, Wakefield, Daisuke, Smoltz, Penny, Buchholz, Bowden, Masterson) THAT is how you win - you build depth.

The Mets have been a joke for years now - they blew TWO September division leads. Their manager is fucking horrible. Their GM is a joke. I mean this. I'd rather be a Royals fan than a Mets fan. At least the Royals have Greinke.
DJ CISC0 4:48 PM - 30 June, 2009
The Yankees just acquired former Sox player Eric Hinske from the Pirates for a pair of minor leaguers.

Hmmm. I guess it's a pretty good move by the Yanks considering they got him for next to nothing. It'll add some defense to the outfield plus he also plays the infield.

Lad, what did you think about him when he was with Boston in 07?

Bring on the STATS! LOL.
uno seis 5:58 PM - 30 June, 2009
the entire pirates farm system is going to be former yankee prospects haha
dj lad 1:45 AM - 1 July, 2009
I think Hinske is gonna really benefit from playing in that stadium - his swing is built to play there. He's replacing Nady as the 5th outfielder and backup 1b (and maybe 3b - hasnt played much there in a while).

He's a decent player now - no longer the guy he was when he won the ROY, but he's going to help enough. He can spell Teixeira and Rodriguez and take over in the OF for Swisher/Damon/Matsui when necessary.

Solid pickup, especially since the Yankees apparently got the Bucs to pick up half his salary.
dj lad 2:05 AM - 1 July, 2009
Wow, the Red Sox - AS A TEAM - just left the field with two outs. Just walked off. Because they're dumbasses. Awesome.
DJ CISC0 2:29 AM - 1 July, 2009
What??? LOL. Honestly, there is a lot of players nowadays who really don't pay any attention to outs and counts anymore. We're seeing it more and more lately.

LOL....I have to see that one though on ESPN.
DJ CISC0 2:32 AM - 1 July, 2009
Wow!

I can't believe Yook beat out Teixeira for the all star spot. You guys must've been voting your asses off. I guess NYers have other things to do.
DJ d.range 2:38 AM - 1 July, 2009
Quote:
Wow, the Red Sox - AS A TEAM - just left the field with two outs. Just walked off. Because they're dumbasses. Awesome.


last week, against the Mets, St Louis, turned a DP for the 3rd out, and just stood on the field

Quote:
Wow!

I can't believe Yook beat out Teixeira for the all star spot. You guys must've been voting your asses off. I guess NYers have other things to do.


more people in NY
dj lad 2:57 AM - 1 July, 2009
Yeah, and the voting goes until the July 2nd, I believe.

FWIW, these are my all-star rosters, assuming voting holds as of yesterday (didn't update for the newest voting news)

C Mauer MIN
1B Teixeira NYY
2B Kinsler TEX
3B Longoria TAM
SS Jeter NYY
OF Bay BOS
OF Ichiro SEA
OF Hamilton* TEX

C Napoli LAA
C/1B Martinez CLE
1B Pena TAM
1B Branyan SEA
1B/3B Youkilis BOS
3B Inge DET
2B Hill TOR
SS Bartlett TAM
SS Scutaro TOR
OF Hunter* LAA
OF Dye CHW
OF Zobrist* TAM
OF Jones BAL

SP Greinke KC
SP Hernandez SEA
SP Jackson DET
SP Halladay TOR
SP Verlander DET
SP Millwood TEX
SP Weaver LAA
RP Papelbon BOS
RP Rivera NYY
RP Fuentes LAA
RP Nathan MIN
RP Bailey OAK

Pos NL Team
C Molina STL
1B Pujols STL
2B Utley PHL
3B Wright NYM
SS Ramirez FLA
OF Ibanez PHL
OF Braun MIL
OF Beltran NYM

C McCann ATL
C Hanigan CIN
1B Fielder MIL
1B Gonzalez SD
3B Sandoval SF
3B Reynolds ARI
2B Sanchez PIT
SS Tejeda HOU
SS Tulowitzki COL
OF Hawpe COL
OF Upton ARI
OF Dunn WAS


SP Vazquez ATL
SP Lincecum SF
SP Haren ARI
SP Gallardo MIL
SP Santana NYM
SP Johnson FLA
SP Cain SF
SP Lilly CHC
RP Bell SD
RP Franklin STL
RP Rodriguez NYM
RP Broxton LAD


And I know the humor of my picking K-Rod for the all-star game.
DJ d.range 3:01 AM - 1 July, 2009
don't think Beltran will play...
dj lad 3:08 AM - 1 July, 2009
Right. Beltran will still get voted in though. Those starting lineups are who the leaders were as of yesterday.

I'd say you can replace him in the starting line up with Upton and then put Hunter Pence on the team.
DJ d.range 3:11 AM - 1 July, 2009
you lad, u know anything about some H.S. kid whos hittin the ball 500+ feet?
DJ CISC0 3:17 AM - 1 July, 2009
That's a tight list lad. It looks like you might not be bias at all :)...Kinsler over Pedroia? Wow, even I would've chose Pedroia over Kinsler......then I would've picked Cano...LOL!

I'm not too sure about Hamilton though. Maybe it's just me but, I never bought into the hype.

I skimmed through the NL picks as always.....They're going to lose regardless :)

That reminds me....time to vote!
DJ CISC0 3:19 AM - 1 July, 2009
Quote:
don't think Beltran can play with the Mets...


I agree!
dj lad 3:24 AM - 1 July, 2009
Yeah, Bryce Harper. He's pretty incredible and will likely go #1 to the Nationals next year.

As I said, those "starters" are the ones who were the voting leaders at the time I made the list. I don't agree with Hamitlon being there, but if the fans vote him in, then he's in. Even then, Kinsley and Hill deserve to be there over Pedroia or Cano.
dj lad 3:25 AM - 1 July, 2009
Meanwhile, the Sox bullpen has blown a 10-1 lead and are now down 11-10. I've just been laughing about it.
dj lad 3:30 AM - 1 July, 2009
I hope Hardy doesn't get mad I left Miguel Cabrera off my roster. It's hard to justify carrying 5 1B types, and he's been the worst of Youkilis/Teixeira/Pena/Branyan.
DVDjHardy 3:38 AM - 1 July, 2009
Actually, it'll be atrocious if he gets left out! :p

I don't quite keep up with the stats for other teams, but he's really been the only consistent offensive player for the Tigers this year - although Inge and Granderson have helped in terms of home runs. I watch about 80% of their games, and I think without him playing as well as he has, they'd be under .500 right now.

Anyways, All-Star game is not that big of a deal to me. I hope he gets to stay at home and get some rest! And I REALLY hope that Verlander doesn't have to pitch during the game either....

PS - I voted about 20 times. First roster reflected the players I thought that truly deserved to be there in the AL. I just have to guess for the NL or vote for players I like. And the other ballots....they rep the Tigers rosters! LOL
dj lad 3:46 AM - 1 July, 2009
Oh, I agree. But he's 5th in OPS among 1st basemen. Besides, I put three other Detroit players on the team.

And with that, the Sox have officially blown a 9 run lead. Wow.
DJ CISC0 5:03 AM - 1 July, 2009
Quote:
And with that, the Sox have officially blown a 9 run lead. Wow.


I just saw that! Thanks!

To Bmore at that?

See? This is why I don't get crazy with the stats. Stats are thrown out the window and make you go crazy....meanwhile, someone gets a stomach ache or juice "withdrawal" and everything goes to shit.
DVDjHardy 5:08 AM - 1 July, 2009
Joel Zumaya is probably the worst-fielding pitcher I've EVER seen!
dj lad 6:16 AM - 1 July, 2009
They blew it because after the rain delay they mentally checked out of the game.

Stats alone won't get you anywhere and neither will scouting. Using them both in the right way, that's how you build a non-Mets team.
uno seis 2:33 PM - 1 July, 2009
Quote:
Joel Zumaya is probably the worst-fielding pitcher I've EVER seen!


lol are you talking about the ball that orlando cabrera hit?
uno seis 2:34 PM - 1 July, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
And with that, the Sox have officially blown a 9 run lead. Wow.


I just saw that! Thanks!

To Bmore at that?

See? This is why I don't get crazy with the stats. Stats are thrown out the window and make you go crazy....meanwhile, someone gets a stomach ache or juice "withdrawal" and everything goes to shit.


so boston blows ONE lead in an extremely crazy game and it makes you want to throw stats out the window?
DVDjHardy 4:12 PM - 1 July, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
Joel Zumaya is probably the worst-fielding pitcher I've EVER seen!


lol are you talking about the ball that orlando cabrera hit?


can't remember who it was that hit a slow roller between 1st and 2nd base. Zumaya just kinda slid on it like a little bitch instead of picking it up and throwing it to the 1st base. Dude just annoys me...I don't know why. May be its because he misses baseball games due to retarded "injuries".
DJ CISC0 4:56 PM - 1 July, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And with that, the Sox have officially blown a 9 run lead. Wow.


I just saw that! Thanks!

To Bmore at that?

See? This is why I don't get crazy with the stats. Stats are thrown out the window and make you go crazy....meanwhile, someone gets a stomach ache or juice "withdrawal" and everything goes to shit.


so boston blows ONE lead in an extremely crazy game and it makes you want to throw stats out the window?


I stated earlier in this thread that I'm not a fan of stats. And what was so "crazy" about that game anyway? So it was rain delayed OK.......So Baltimore didn't have to wait just as long as Boston?
uno seis 5:10 PM - 1 July, 2009
i just meant that 11-10 games that feature 9-run comebacks aren't exactly commonplace, so there's no reason to throw stats out the window based on a game like that
dj lad 8:12 PM - 1 July, 2009
It was crazy because the Sox basically checked out of the game during the delay (as evidenced by their walking off the field with 2 outs).
DJ CISC0 10:14 PM - 1 July, 2009
Bah! Whatever. Sox blew the lead and Papelbum blew the save :)

No need to try and justify it.
Uno- I throw stats out the window everytime and everyday. It's something I always saw as 'fun facts". Again....MOST stats and not all stats.

Especially in baseball. They F'n know when was the last time Jeter hit 2 doubles... against two different pitchers...in the same inning...before 8pm....

Just look at the new "hold" stat. WTF is that about!?
DJ CISC0 8:19 PM - 5 July, 2009
So Tim Wakefield makes it to the All Star game? Did they feel sorry for him or something?
DVDjHardy 2:01 AM - 7 July, 2009
Tigers are stinking it up!

Range...if you feel bad about your team, start following the Tigers right about now.
DJ d.range 2:47 AM - 7 July, 2009
Dontrell Willis was a huge disapointment, i wanted him on the Mets eal bad, not now tho

although i will say thanks for Sheffield 400,000 was a steal!
dj lad 2:06 PM - 8 July, 2009
Wakefield had no business being picked. I guess think of it as a "lifetime achievement" pick. Plus, it'll be fun to see the knuckler in the ASG with catchers who have never caught one behind the plate.

Hold isn't a new stat, and it's stupid. Just like the save stat is stupid.
DVDjHardy 2:15 PM - 8 July, 2009
I'm gonna try to vote at least a 1000 times today for Brandon Inge for the all-star game! That's my favorite player....Help me out and vote for him! :)

mlb.com
DJ CISC0 9:14 PM - 8 July, 2009
Quote:
I'm gonna try to vote at least a 1000 times today for Brandon Inge for the all-star game! That's my favorite player....Help me out and vote for him! :)

mlb.com


That's a really close race he's in.
DVDjHardy 9:30 PM - 8 July, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
I'm gonna try to vote at least a 1000 times today for Brandon Inge for the all-star game! That's my favorite player....Help me out and vote for him! :)

mlb.com


That's a really close race he's in.


Keep voting! I'll buy you a beer or five next time I'm in NYC! :)
DJ d.range 2:02 AM - 9 July, 2009
wakefield has more wins than santana this season
DJ CISC0 3:00 AM - 10 July, 2009
Quote:
Keep voting! I'll buy you a beer or five next time I'm in NYC! :)

You're welcome! I drink Coors Light BTW...So when are you coming back to NYC? LOL!

@djlad- Watchwww.youtube.com
dj lad 6:54 AM - 10 July, 2009
Quote:
wakefield has more wins than santana this season

Wins are such a useless metric to qualify good pitching.

Hell, even ERA isn't that great. Using rate stats like K/BB, K/9, BB/9, HR/9 are better. Rate stats can often show how a pitcher is REALLY doing - if they're walking a lot of batters (like Jon Papelbon) compared to their strikeout rate (like Jon Papelbon) it usually means they're getting lucky despite a low ERA.

Two pitchers to compare:
Pitcher A: 1.89 ERA, 22 SV, 18 BB, 40 K, 4 HR, 38 IP
Pitcher B: 2.11 ERA, 17 SV, 23 BB, 48 K, 1 HR 38.1 IP

Who is having a better season? Frankly, it's hard to say. But the point is that Pitcher A is an all-star and Pitcher B probably didn't sniff it. I'd honestly say that Pitcher B is having a better year.
dj lad 7:08 AM - 10 July, 2009
One really cool stat is WPA: it's Win Probabilty Added. Basically a group of statisticians went and took EVERY single game from the last 15 years and put them into a database. From wikipedia:
Quote:
The Win Probability for a specific situation in baseball (including the inning, number of outs, men on base, and score) is obtained by first finding all the teams that have encountered this situation. Then the winning percentage of these teams in these situations is found. This probability figure is then adjusted for home-field advantage. Thus Win Probability Added is the difference between the Win Probability when the player came to bat and the Win Probability when the play ended.


Basically it shows how valuable a player REALLY is. It values a 3-run homer in the ninth inning, down by 2 runs, a FAR more than a 3-run homer up by 10 in the ninth. Does this make sense?

Anyhow, here are you leaders for the season.

AL Hitters:
(best)
Johnny Damon: 3.13
Jason Bay: 2.89
Ben Zobrist: 2.79
Mark Teixeira: 2.42
Joe Mauer: 2.30
(worst)
Robinson Cano: -1.90
Mike Lowell: -1.62
Ben Francisco: -1.27
Ryan Sweeney: -1.17
Mike Jacobs: -1.13

NL Hitters:
(best)
Albert Pujols: 4.51
Prince Fielder: 3.99
Chase Utley: 3.55
Raul Ibanez: 3.50
Pablo Santoval: 2.82
(worst)
Chris Young: -2.27
Willy Tavares: -1.98
Jeff Franceour: - 1.85
Mike Fontenot: -1.61
Jimmy Rollins: -1.57


AL Pitchers:
(best)
Zack Greinke: 2.96
Edwin Jackson: 2.60
Justin Verlander: 1.99
Roy Halladay: 1.93
Cliff Lee: 1.73
(worst)
Jeremy Guthrie: -1.29
Brian Tallet: -1.27
Francisco Liriano: -1.17
Brett Anderson: -.99
Trevor Cahill: -.93

NL Pitchers:
(best)
Jason Marquis: 2.61
Dan Haren: 2.52
Tim Lincecum: 2.46
Matt Cain: 2.31
Josh Johnson: 2.21
(worst)
Todd Wellemeyer: -1.63
Shairon Martis: -1.19
Kevin Correia: -1.01
Bronson Arroyo: -.89
Jamie Moyer: -.88

For the record, the best/worst relievers for each league are:
AL: Jon Papelbon 2.54/Brandon League -1.51
NL: Ramon Troncoso 2.64/Brad Lidge -2.21

It's not a perfect stat, as it doesn't take fielding into account (which would probably put Lowell as WAY worse than Cano), but it's pretty cool.
dj lad 7:24 AM - 10 July, 2009
I wish I could find the single game leaders for WPA, but from what I can tell, this is the highest possible:

Pitcher allows no hits through 9 innings, but triples every time up, and 3 batters reach via error each inning. Pitcher strikes out side each inning, stranding 27 baserunners, getting to 3rd 4 times, then homering in the bottom of the 9th.

That is, unless the pitcher turned unassisted triple plays every inning. Not sure.
DVDjHardy 7:28 AM - 10 July, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
Keep voting! I'll buy you a beer or five next time I'm in NYC! :)

You're welcome! I drink Coors Light BTW...So when are you coming back to NYC? LOL!

@djlad- Watchwww.youtube.com


haha, good question. Probably sometime before the end of this year, but who knows...but yes, I'm happy as a little baby eating non-baby food for the first time!
DPR250R 12:08 PM - 10 July, 2009
Yanks and Sox tied for 1st.... no matter which side your on you gotta love it!!!
DJ CISC0 6:13 PM - 10 July, 2009
Quote:
I wish I could find the single game leaders for WPA, but from what I can tell, this is the highest possible:

Pitcher allows no hits through 9 innings, but triples every time up, and 3 batters reach via error each inning. Pitcher strikes out side each inning, stranding 27 baserunners, getting to 3rd 4 times, then homering in the bottom of the 9th.

That is, unless the pitcher turned unassisted triple plays every inning. Not sure.

That hurt my head reading it LOL...But I get it. That stat is indeed a very cool f*cking stat!

Quote:
Yanks and Sox tied for 1st.... no matter which side your on you gotta love it!!!

I hate it :)
DJ d.range 1:47 AM - 11 July, 2009
lad, i think you missed your calling...
dj lad 9:27 AM - 11 July, 2009
What was my calling?

I'm a big baseball stat geek, what can I say? I love it. I spend a lot of time reading and crunching numbers, but not nearly as much as others. Fangraphs.com is an AWESOME site for this kind of stuff. You can find out what player swings at the most pitches out of the strike zone (Bengie Molina), what pitcher gets the most swings (Scott Baker), and stuff like that.
uno seis 7:38 PM - 11 July, 2009
i got into baseball stat geek stuff because of fjm. rip...that site was so damn funny
dj lad 11:56 PM - 11 July, 2009
Ken Tremendous is a writer for the Office and a Red Sox fan. Hoo hah!
dj lad 4:47 PM - 12 July, 2009
One of the rarest plays in baseball happened in the Royals/Sox game last night. A 9-2 forceout - since 2000 there hasn't been a single right fielder forceout at 1st, don't know about before that.
dj lad 4:48 PM - 12 July, 2009
Sorry it was to catcher.
dj lad 4:49 PM - 12 July, 2009
A forceout at home on a ball hit to right. CRAZY.
DJ CISC0 11:56 PM - 12 July, 2009
Quote:
A forceout at home on a ball hit to right. CRAZY.


I need to see that! How the hell does that happen?
dj lad 4:04 PM - 13 July, 2009
Bottom of the 6th of the Sox/Royals game on the 11th.

Bases loaded. Line drive hit to right, ball drops right before Drew catches it. He's charging because the ball was hit shallow. Scoops the ball and fires in one motion. Slow runner on third doesn't get home in time.
DJ CISC0 5:57 PM - 13 July, 2009
My boss (a Met fan) just brought to my attention the error Jeter made on Friday night against the Angels. I didn't hear anything about it until he told me just now.

It wasn't as bad as Castillo's error (Jeter did use 2 hands), but the Angels did score 3 runs in that inning. LOL....I guess he just wanted to give me shit about it since it was a very bad Jeter error. He was pretty upset that it didn't get much coverage like the Castillo error :)
DPR250R 7:19 PM - 13 July, 2009
Quote:
My boss (a Met fan) ....


Poor guy... my father is an english teacher and never uses foul language.... unless he is watch thing Mets.... lol...
dj lad 10:48 PM - 13 July, 2009
Playoff odds by Baseball Prospectus:

Team / Projected Wins / Division Champ % / WC % / Total Playoff Chances

Red Sox 95 - 52/ 30 / 82
Yankees 92 - 26 / 32/ 58
Rays 90 - 21 / 26 / 47

Tigers 84 - 39 / .5 / 40
ChiSox 81 - 20 / .5 / 21
Twins 84 - 39 / .5 / 40

Angels 87 - 56 / 3 / 49
Rangers 85 - 25 / 3 / 28
Mariners 84 - 18 / 2 / 20


Phillies 87 - 60 / 4 / 64

Cardinals 87 - 62 / 3 / 65

Dodgers 101 - 95 / 4 / 99
Giants 85 - 2 / 27 / 29
Rockies 87 - 3 / 45 / 48

I included it for all teams over 20% to make the playoffs.
www.baseballprospectus.com
DJ CISC0 8:42 PM - 14 July, 2009
Quote:
Playoff odds by Baseball Prospectus:

Team / Projected Wins / Division Champ % / WC % / Total Playoff Chances

Red Sox 95 - 52/ 30 / 82
Yankees 92 - 26 / 32/ 58

Those numbers will drastically change once we get Halladay.
DJ CISC0 3:33 AM - 15 July, 2009
AL beats the NL- how shocking! LOL...It threw me off for a sec when they showed Mariano's record (12-0-1)...I was like wtf this aint hockey...then I remembered.

Nice! Yankees get home field advantage in the World Series.
DVDjHardy 3:39 AM - 15 July, 2009
Quote:
AL beats the NL- how shocking! LOL...It threw me off for a sec when they showed Mariano's record (12-0-1)...I was like wtf this aint hockey...then I remembered.

Nice! Tigers get home field advantage in the World Series.
DJ d.range 5:00 AM - 15 July, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
AL beats the NL- how shocking! LOL...It threw me off for a sec when they showed Mariano's record (12-0-1)...I was like wtf this aint hockey...then I remembered.

Nice! ummmmm Red Sox get home field advantage in the World Series.
DPR250R 12:12 PM - 15 July, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
AL beats the NL- how shocking! LOL...It threw me off for a sec when they showed Mariano's record (12-0-1)...I was like wtf this aint hockey...then I remembered.

Nice! ummmmm Red Sox get home field advantage in the World Series.



You a Red Sox fan in NYC? That must be fun....
DVDjHardy 1:15 PM - 15 July, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
AL beats the NL- how shocking! LOL...It threw me off for a sec when they showed Mariano's record (12-0-1)...I was like wtf this aint hockey...then I remembered.

Nice! ummmmm Red Sox get home field advantage in the World Series.



You a Red Sox fan in NYC? That must be fun....


I think he's just being more realistic than me or Cis...haha. Plus, I imagine that if you're a Mets fan, you probably root for the Red Sox too.

PS - Even though I hate the White Sox, I love how Obama was rocking a ChiSox jersey when he threw out the first pitch.
DJ CISC0 2:03 PM - 15 July, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
AL beats the NL- how shocking! LOL...It threw me off for a sec when they showed Mariano's record (12-0-1)...I was like wtf this aint hockey...then I remembered.

Nice! ummmmm Red Sox get home field advantage in the World Series.


Hater. I would be one too if I was a Met fan :)
dj lad 9:45 PM - 15 July, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
Playoff odds by Baseball Prospectus:

Team / Projected Wins / Division Champ % / WC % / Total Playoff Chances

Red Sox 95 - 52/ 30 / 82
Yankees 92 - 26 / 32/ 58

Those numbers will drastically change once we get Halladay.

To get Halladay I hope you enjoy giving up Joba + Cervelli + 3 more prospects. The Bedard deal is the baseline and it only goes up from there, especially in the same division. If Halladay is going anywhere, it's St Louis or Philly.
DJ d.range 1:11 AM - 16 July, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
AL beats the NL- how shocking! LOL...It threw me off for a sec when they showed Mariano's record (12-0-1)...I was like wtf this aint hockey...then I remembered.

Nice! ummmmm Red Sox get home field advantage in the World Series.



You a Red Sox fan in NYC? That must be fun....


far from a sox fan, but i think the sox got the best chance of making it out of the AL, hence the home field advantage
DJ CISC0 2:28 AM - 16 July, 2009
Quote:
To get Halladay I hope you enjoy giving up Joba + Cervelli + 3 more prospects. The Bedard deal is the baseline and it only goes up from there, especially in the same division. If Halladay is going anywhere, it's St Louis or Philly.

I doubt they'll do a trade with anyone within the division. Chances are it'll be 3+ teams in a mini blockbuster deal.
DJ d.range 5:07 AM - 16 July, 2009
they saying it don't matter if he goes within the division, b/c in 1 year when hes a free agent the yankees/sox can just buy him anyway, if he does go within the division, that team wil be raped
DVDjHardy 9:23 AM - 16 July, 2009
I couldn't find this on baseball reference of anything else easily accessible. Anyone know who is the all-time leader in career strikes and balls pitched?
DJ CISC0 3:48 PM - 16 July, 2009
Quote:
if he does go within the division, that team wil be raped

The Yankees are used to this so it shouldn't be a problem.
DJ d.range 8:01 PM - 16 July, 2009
i hope the yankees get him..... anyone but the Phillies...

thoughts on Pedro?
dj lad 3:47 PM - 17 July, 2009
I love Pedro....probably my favorite player of all time.

That said, he's a desperation move for the Phils. You're hoping he gives you 100 pitches and gets you to the 6th because that's all he is now.
DJ CISC0 4:59 PM - 17 July, 2009
Quote:
I love Pedro....probably my favorite player of all time.
Please tell me that you were only kidding right?

My opinion on Pedro is that he left his good stuff in Boston. I can't picture him throwing 100 pitches consistantly.
dj lad 9:35 PM - 18 July, 2009
Pedro is my favorite player of all time. He's charismatic, competitive and smart.

He was 5'8", 175 pounds and was DOMINATING during the steroids era. From 1997-2003, he was the best pitcher of all time - no single pitcher had a 7 year span better than that.

Who is Karim Garcia?
DJ CISC0 3:51 PM - 20 July, 2009
LOL. I remember Karim Garcia...why?

Without a doubt Pedro (the Yankees son) was a hell of a pitcher when he was with Boston. But to say that he was the best pitcher of all time is crazy talk.
DJ d.range 9:58 PM - 20 July, 2009
^^^
look @ the #'s
among them, highest winning percetage ever, if i'm not mistaken
uno seis 10:02 PM - 20 July, 2009
what made pedro so awesome during that time period was the fact that guys all over the league were hitting tons of homers and scoring was way up etc
DVDjHardy 1:52 PM - 21 July, 2009
Quote:
what made pedro so awesome during that time period was the fact that guys all over the league were hitting tons of homers and scoring was way up etc


+1 on Pedro. At the time, I thought Clemens was more impressive because I always liked him better. However, looking back....no doubt that Pedro was the best over that period. And obviously not on roids either.

My fav pitchers would be a tie between Jack Morris and Greg Maddux.
uno seis 3:01 PM - 21 July, 2009
that oakland minnesota game last night was AWESOME
dj lad 1:14 AM - 22 July, 2009
Pedro was the best pitcher over any 7 year span, ever. It's not even debatable unless you're talking about Koufax in his peak. But even then.... I don't buy it.

(Btw, that "Who is Karim Garcia" line was said by Pedro...)

Anyway, this is what Pedro did from 1997-2003:

118-36, 1408 IP, 1009 H, 1761 K, 315 BB, and an ERA+ of 213. His worst ERA of any season was 2.89, his first in the AL HIS WORST!!!

In one season, his ERA was 1.74. Second was Clemens with 3.70 - that's almost two points higher! That's INSANE.

Cisco, I think we've gotten to know each other pretty well in this thread, and I don't usually make claims about stats I can't back up - this is one I won't only back up but I'll say I'm 100% right on. With pitchers over 2000 IP in their career, Pedro is #1 with a 154 ERA+. Second through tenth read like the HOF legends list:
Lefty Grove, Walter Johnson, Hoyt Wilhelm, Ed Walsh, Roger Clemens, Addie Joss, Mordecai Brown, Cy Young, Christy Mathewson.

Absurdity. Pedro beats them all.
DJ CISC0 3:29 PM - 23 July, 2009
^^ I never doubted you Vlad :) When it comes to stats I think you've made you point that you seem to know them and have good access to them. I honestly think you might even need some help...lol.JK.

Well, off the top of my head and without looking at stats I would've went with:

1-Koufax
2-Seaver
3-Ryan
4-Johnson
5-Clemens

In no particular oder.

Oh yeah...I won't even mention the first place thing for now...gotta run! Be back in a few.
dj lad 8:47 PM - 23 July, 2009
WHOA. Okay.
NOLAN RYAN?

Nolan Ryan is without a doubt, the most overrated athlete in professional sports history. Now, why do I say that? He built a legend on his "no hitters" and his "good ol boy" attitude. I can think of 10 pitchers (at least) since 1945 (post-war baseball) I'd rather have pitch a Game 7 for me than him. I mean that. Ryan was a good single-game pitcher but was above average for his career. He was terrific at avoiding hits, but he just turned them into walks instead (1st all time in walks). Yes, he struck out 5700 guys, but he did it at a 2:1 K:BB ratio. That's pretty mediocre.

Moreover, as I said, he's gained "legendary" status for his no-hitters. That's all fine and good, but those are excellence over a single game, not over a career. Don't get me wrong, length of career counts - that's why Wakefield is valuable. He gives you 170-200 innings of league average pitching. And Ryan was a better pitcher than Wakefield ever was. But there's simply no real argument that anyone can make that can put Nolan Ryan in the top 5 pitchers of all time.

If you noticed though, I said that Pedro has the best 7-year span of any pitcher ever, not career. I wouldn't argue that he's the best pitcher ever - he's not, that's Walter Johnson. But he did have the best 7 year span ever. The only one who can compare is Koufax from 1960-1966 - that's it.

Cisco, I think you're dramatically underrating how impressive Pedro was considering when he pitched and how good he was. He put up comparable stats to Koufax's best 7 years, except that Koufax did it at the best time in baseball history (post 1900) to be a pitcher and Pedro did it at the very worst.
DJ CISC0 7:48 PM - 24 July, 2009
My fault...For some reason I thought I read "best pitcher ever". So yeah, without a doubt that span was the best ever...no question. I never underrated Pedro, in fact I always liked watching him dominate batters (except the Yankees of course).

"The most overrated athlete in the world"? Wait, I thought that was David Ortiz? LOL! Seriously though, I can see myself choosing Ryan to pitch a game 7 for me based on his SO stats alone...why not? You're acting like 7 shutouts is an easy task to accomplish...especially when it's up against another major league team. They can be the wackest team but they're still a major league team.

Like I said those picks were off the top of my head so it's nothing. It's really difficult to choose who the best pitchers or players were anyway....with everything that you have to factor in and all.
DJ d.range 10:05 PM - 24 July, 2009
PREDICTION:

Joe Torre will win the 1st World Series @ the new Yankee Statium...

remember where you heard it 1st!
dj lad 10:21 PM - 24 July, 2009
Ryan's problem was that while he struck out a lot of guys, he also walked a lot. Which is bad. Now, he was able to throw, you know, 150 pitches a start because his body was built for it.

Ryan is the most overrated athlete. I really believe that. He's still a hall of famer, and he's still a great pitcher, but he's often talked about in the same circle as Koufax, Walter Johnson, Maddux, and Cy Young, which he simply isn't.
DJ CISC0 9:21 PM - 26 July, 2009
Quote:
PREDICTION:

Joe Torre will win the 1st World Series @ the new Yankee Statium...

remember where you heard it 1st!

Wait, I thought you were going with Boston? You got to make up your mind range...LOL!

WTF are we talking about Nolan Ryan for anyway? Yanks are in first! Soooo back to the subject at hand. My Yankees are on a tear lately...First place, winnning streaks here and there, pitching has been good, and bats are waking up. Of course gotta thank Boston for making all possible :)
DJ CISC0 8:16 PM - 27 July, 2009
LOL. Mets fire Tony Bernazard. I just finished watching the press conference. WTF was this guy doing over there? Sounds like he was mentally abusing the Mets and it's farm system.
"Mets executive Tony Bernazard reportedly challenged the club's Double-A team to fight him during a recent postgame tirade."-ESPN
uno seis 8:17 PM - 27 July, 2009
the yanks whupped on my Oakland A's this past weekend =(
DJ CISC0 8:21 PM - 27 July, 2009
Quote:
the yanks whupped on my Oakland A's this past weekend =(

Hell yeah. Just like we are supposed to do to teams in last place...LOL. Sorry man :)
DJ d.range 10:14 PM - 27 July, 2009
Quote:
LOL. Mets fire Tony Bernazard. I just finished watching the press conference. WTF was this guy doing over there? Sounds like he was mentally abusing the Mets and it's farm system.
"Mets executive Tony Bernazard reportedly challenged the club's Double-A team to fight him during a recent postgame tirade."-ESPN



IMO he's the reason for the mets downfall the last couple of years...

he was in the hotel lobby when willie got fired, grillin him...

he flipped out on a minor league clubhouse attendant who asked him if he was the bus driver...

he flipped out on the minor league team, taking his shirt off asking who wanna fight...

he got into an arguement with K-Rod a couple of week ago in Atl.

dude is an asshole, this is the best move the Mets made all year
DJ CISC0 1:25 AM - 28 July, 2009
Quote:
IMO he's the reason for the mets downfall the last couple of years...

Nah man c'mon.....There's too many reasons why the Mets fail every year. It wasn't just him.
DJ d.range 2:07 AM - 28 July, 2009
he definately contributed, you can't have an attitude like that in the clubhouse

mets just hit a grand slam BTW, coincidence, i think not
dj lad 1:25 AM - 29 July, 2009
The reason that the Mets suck is their GM. He built a VERY top-heavy team and has no starting pitching past Santana and Maine. He's a very bad GM and he's not going anywhere since the Wilpons just lost a lot of money in the Bernie Madoff ponzi scheme.
DJ CISC0 12:58 AM - 30 July, 2009
I honestly thought Omar started off on the good foot though. At the time it seemed like he made some pretty decent pickups but then it ended there.
Quote:
mets just hit a grand slam BTW, coincidence, i think not
LOL...I feel for Met fans man I really do.
DVDjHardy 7:59 PM - 30 July, 2009
So nobody has heard of it yet? This is a big one: David Ortiz and Manny Ramirez were both on that list of 100 players who tested positive in 2003...

I don't get too angry at pro athletes because I know they're all human and bound to make mistakes just like the rest of us. But I think Ortiz was the last straw for me...I can never trust any of these players again. They're all guilty until proven innocent to me now...I don't care who it is. If they had big power numbers, they're guilty to me. I never thought Ortiz would be a cheater, especially after the strong words he used this past offseason about kicking out all the players who get caught using steroids from MLB.

This fucking blows! I would do anything to play one game in MLB for free, so I really don't get how any guy who has already made it to the big leagues and is getting paid millions already to play baseball for six months out of the year can so incredibly stupid. Fucking jackasses.
DJ CISC0 8:42 PM - 30 July, 2009
Finally, finally, finally! It's about time they release some Red Sox names. Hardy, I knew Ortiz was taking something so it was just a matter of time that word got out. You don't go from being a mediocre player in Minnesota to being a beast in Boston overnight.

I'm also really disappointed at ALL of the players that tested positive for ANY enhancing drugs because they not only tarnished the game but let down so many kids that looked up to them. BUT, I can't really blame them 100% though. I blame baseball and Bug Selig for turning a blind eye to this for so long.

I say strip the Red Sox of their 04 and 07 rings!!! Those rings won't count to me anymore...so back to 1918 for them.
The Notourious B.K.S. 8:45 PM - 30 July, 2009
Face the facts, people on your favorite team are on that list too! There will be MORE Yankee's on it, Mets on it, Rangers on it, Mariners on it. The only team I think that might actually be safe is Pittsburgh, they have sucked since 92 lol!

All this talk about stripping of titles,thats just dumb. Shit, how many players have been on the shit, I say make it legal, let them all take it and then watch what happens. You want to even the playing field? Let everybody do it! lol
DJ CISC0 8:54 PM - 30 July, 2009
Quote:
The only team I think that might actually be safe is Pittsburgh, they have sucked since 92 lol!
LOL. Pittsburg even sucked at taking steriods.
Yeah, I think the WWE should just buyout a portion of baseball at this point...I mean why not.
DJ CISC0 8:59 PM - 30 July, 2009
Ortiz is such a hypocrite too. Remember how he was bashing A-Rod for taking roids?
DJ d.range 11:02 PM - 30 July, 2009
Pedro is on the list =\
DJ CISC0 11:55 PM - 30 July, 2009
Wow...Look at these Ortiz stats that espn just showed

Before 2003
Seasons = 6
BA=. 266
HR= 58
RBI= 238

After 2003 (when he joined the Red Sox)
Seasons= 7
BA= .290
HR= 244
RBI= 766

I don't think we'll be hearing from vlad for a minute....it's a sad day in Boston right now :)
lvmez 11:47 AM - 31 July, 2009
Quote:
PREDICTION:

Joe Torre will win the 1st World Series @ the new Yankee Statium...

remember where you heard it 1st!


worst prediction i've heard. the dodgers will get swept by the phillies. dodgers are overated in that weak division.
dj lad 7:03 PM - 31 July, 2009
Quote:
I say strip the Red Sox of their 04 and 07 rings!!! Those rings won't count to me anymore...so back to 1918 for them.

This is stupid. So stupid. So very stupid.

Just about the dumbest thing I've ever read.

There is no reason to do so. Every single team, and I'd wager 80% of players, were on some sort of drug. Are you REALLY willing to go back and strip those Yankee teams? What about players who were on greenies back in the 40s, 50s, and 60s? Those are amphetamines - and banned now - so shouldn't we strip Hank Aaron of his home run record too? I mean, he was using a drug to get himself going - whats the difference? What about Babe Ruth, who used to inject material from sheep testicles into his body (I'm not joking, look it up), thinking it would help him get stronger?

The point is this: we can't go back and change the past. Putting asterisks on things, stripping titles, that's just stupid. EVERY baseball fan with half a brain knew that there were players on EVERY TEAM who were using PEDs. There's a few other things I'd like to say about this. First - we don't know what Ortiz tested positive for. For all we know, he tested positive for something that was legal in MLB, but not by the standards of the International Doping Agency - which is entirely possible. Second - I think that Ortiz has earned the benefit of the doubt - let's find out what he tested positive for. The guy has been a very vocal supporter for a stricter steroid policy.

NOW, as for this:

Quote:
Before 2003
Seasons = 6
BA=. 266
HR= 58
RBI= 238

After 2003 (when he joined the Red Sox)
Seasons= 7
BA= .290
HR= 244
RBI= 766


Where do I begin? That's really unfair to call that 6 seasons. He played 455 seasons there and was injured a lot - he had an tear in his wrist that sapped him of his power for a long time. He was also playing in a system that asked him to BUNT.

Now, he comes to Boston and he hits much better, becomes a legend, etcetera. What do I think happened? Honestly? I think he did use something to get stronger. But stronger doesn't suddenly make you a better hitter - it just makes you stronger. I think, like a lot of other guys who leave an organization and get better, he got a better hitting coach, was playing in a lineup with guys like Manny, Nomar, etc - and he changed his stance. There is absolute PROOF of him changing how he physically stood at the plate - pitchers used to be able to sneak fastball by him inside and partway through the season that just ceased to be a possibility. It wasn't. So now what? Obviously it wasn't all some sort of PED, and anyone who follows baseball can tell this.

Again, I think giving Ortiz the benefit of the doubt to find out what he tested positive for is a good thing. He faced the media immediately and let them know when he found out, he'd let everyone know. The guy has been a VERY vocal basher of steroid use. I'm a Red Sox fan, yeah, so I'm sort of on a side here - but I still think it's fair to let someone find out what they did wrong before we hang them.

(Also, dude, it's Lad, not Vlad).
DVDjHardy 7:58 PM - 31 July, 2009
We got Washburn!!! That makes for a really solid starting rotation!
DJ d.range 9:21 PM - 31 July, 2009
on a side note, i heard that one of the lawyers who leaked names is doing a 21/2 year bid.....

@ first i wanted all the players names outed, but now that i'm a little more familiar, i feel like the civil rights violation that these players have endured is worse that people who might be on a drug playing a game
DJ CISC0 9:28 PM - 31 July, 2009
My bad...I knew it was lad. I work with a Vlad so I think I got it confused when I was typing:)

Anyway...I was just kidding when I said strip them of the titles...but seriously those WS championships are now tainted so I will not count them as being legit....whatever way you slice it, it is what it is. And I won't be the only one that will think like that. It's just like in my mind the person who still holds the record for most HRs will be Roger Maris.

Now, I don't care if Ortiz changed his stance or they made him bunt when he wasn't with Boston. It's a stat that clearly says he was on something.

I hate when I hear the argument that it "only makes you stronger and will not change your skill". OK, so I'm an average player that can never hit it out of the park.....I get some juice and now I'm hitting HRs 500ft or better.....you see how steroids changes things even though it doesn't affect your skill?

And I'm not going to throw him completely under the bus either until more details come out. But you have to admit like Hardy said....it's guilty until proven innocent in today's game of baseball.
DJ CISC0 9:31 PM - 31 July, 2009
Quote:
on a side note, i heard that one of the lawyers who leaked names is doing a 21/2 year bid.....

@ first i wanted all the players names outed, but now that i'm a little more familiar, i feel like the civil rights violation that these players have endured is worse that people who might be on a drug playing a game

I want all of the names LOL. Did you hear that Canseco mentioned that there is also a HOFer on that list?
DVDjHardy 9:41 PM - 31 July, 2009
So Red Sox got Victor Martininez, which is pretty nice.
White Sux got Jake Peavey (who is on the DL)....punk bitches.
DJ d.range 9:53 PM - 31 July, 2009
Quote:
but seriously those WS championships are now tainted so I will not count them as being legit


IMO, they are not tainted b/c it was an even playing fiel, and by even i mean the whole league was on roids...

Quote:
I hate when I hear the argument that it "only makes you stronger and will not change your skill". OK, so I'm an average player that can never hit it out of the park.....I get some juice and now I'm hitting HRs 500ft or better.....you see how steroids changes things even though it doesn't affect your skill?


this is how i see it...

steroids increases your strength...
increased strength means increased bat speed/control...
increased bat speed/control means you get a better swing on the ball.

what i don't like is players taking ADD drugs to focus better
DVDjHardy 9:58 PM - 31 July, 2009
Steroids don't really increase your strength. They just give your body the ability to recover sooner.
DJ d.range 10:31 PM - 31 July, 2009
ok, but most guys are using them to recover faster from workouts, that add strength
DJ CISC0 2:04 AM - 2 August, 2009
Quote:
So Red Sox got Victor Martininez, which is pretty nice.
White Sux got Jake Peavey (who is on the DL)....punk bitches.

Both are great pick ups.
DJ CISC0 2:17 AM - 2 August, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
but seriously those WS championships are now tainted so I will not count them as being legit


IMO, they are not tainted b/c it was an even playing fiel, and by even i mean the whole league was on roids...

Nah. They're going back to 1918 in my mind...so the curse still lives...LOL
DJ CISC0 4:00 AM - 3 August, 2009
Red Sox fired 2 staff members for having steroids on them.sports.espn.go.com
DJ CISC0 4:04 AM - 3 August, 2009
Melky hits for the cycle and it wasn't at the "new" Yankee stadium....go figure right!? sports.espn.go.com
DJ d.range 4:08 AM - 3 August, 2009
Quote:
Red Sox fired 2 staff members for having steroids on them.sports.espn.go.com



is this the story where one of the guys fired was one of the announcers son or something?
DJ CISC0 4:20 AM - 3 August, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
Red Sox fired 2 staff members for having steroids on them.sports.espn.go.com



is this the story where one of the guys fired was one of the announcers son or something?

Yep!
dj lad 8:34 PM - 4 August, 2009
Remys kid also beat his girlfriend. He's a dick 100%.
L1011 8:33 AM - 5 August, 2009
Guys, I will be in NYC in September (Next month) and I wanna goto the Yankee's VS Redsox game on the 25th...

My very first baseball game after watching on TV for years!!

Question is what section on the stadium is best for viewing?? What area's would u recommend? Or more so NOT recommend i buy tickets in>

Thanks!! and I cannot wait till I get there!!!
DVDjHardy 11:27 AM - 5 August, 2009
Quote:
What area's would u recommend?


I love NYC but I recomment you watch a baseball game in Detroit and St. Louis with real baseball fans. :)
DVDjHardy 11:27 AM - 5 August, 2009
*recommend
DJ CISC0 2:54 PM - 5 August, 2009
Quote:
Guys, I will be in NYC in September (Next month) and I wanna goto the Yankee's VS Redsox game on the 25th...

My very first baseball game after watching on TV for years!!

Question is what section on the stadium is best for viewing?? What area's would u recommend? Or more so NOT recommend i buy tickets in>

Thanks!! and I cannot wait till I get there!!!

For a series like that I would HIGHLY recommend you sit in the bleachers. Not the best view but you'll have a blast if you're not the type who gets easily offended :) I didn't like the old bleachers when they banned alcohol from there but they lifted the ban now so it's back to being cool. Of course, if you have enough money you can go all out and drop about $2,600 a ticket and sit on the field. They are also some seats that have blind spots so I would look those up...I don't know them off the top of my head.

Your choice of seating would probably be limited because it's a Sox/Yankees series. Most of the good seats usually get sold out quick.
DJ CISC0 5:47 PM - 5 August, 2009
I don't know who talks the most crap...McCarver or Morgan.blogs.nypost.com
slimmjimm 2:27 PM - 6 August, 2009
Quote:
I don't know who talks the most crap...McCarver or Morgan.blogs.nypost.com



Wasn't what I expected him to say, and I can actually say that I agree to some extent.
uno seis 2:30 PM - 6 August, 2009
yeah i also thought it was gonna be another "joba should be an 8th inning setup man!" rant
DJ CISC0 6:31 PM - 6 August, 2009
McCarver is an idiot. He also thought that Pete Rose shouldn't be let back in to baseball. He said that "betting" is the worse crime in baseball....WTF!? I also heard that he's going to be coming out with a CD too...LOL!

O.K so let's get it on! Roid Sox VS Yanks 4 game series starts tonight in the Bronx. Looks like we'll be increasing this first place lead :)
uno seis 7:33 PM - 6 August, 2009
Quote:
McCarver is an idiot


hilarious evidence here: www.firejoemorgan.com
DJ CISC0 7:41 PM - 6 August, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
McCarver is an idiot


hilarious evidence here: www.firejoemorgan.com

HAHA...that looks like some funny stuff in there. Wait, let me get a cup of coffee...I gotta read the whole thing.
DVDjHardy 7:54 PM - 6 August, 2009
Haha, those are hilarious! I hate both guys too! I actually wish somebody besides Fox gets the contract to do WS soon.
DJ CISC0 8:25 PM - 6 August, 2009
LMAO @ these Tim McCarver quotes

"I only care about on-base percentage if you can run. If you can't run, I could care less about on-base percentage."

"A-Rod just fouls that ball off beautily."

"On-base percentage? How about contact percentage?!"

"First year as a relief pitcher in the Angel chain, Woods made 97 out of 98 starts, did Woods, as a starter."

"In Scrabble, W's are worth 4 points. S's are only worth 1 point. But as far as Papelbon is concerned, S's are worth a lot more than W's."

"It stands to reason that guys vary as far as their strength is concerned from start to start. Sometimes 90 pitches is too much. Sometimes 130 pitches are not enough. A guy could throw 150 pitches per start."

"A Mark Wohlberg fastball. Catch me if you can."

"I think if Norman Rockwell were alive the guy that he would paint more than anyone else would be David Eckstein."
slimmjimm 3:56 AM - 7 August, 2009
ahhh, finally got the monkey off their backs. boston can win the next 3 and we'll still be .5 games up. hate to say it, and i respect his career, but smoltz does not appear to be able to continue much further. also, i know you need youkilis' bat in the lineup, but left field?

anyway, i've got my drink on and the yanks have made me happy.
DJ CISC0 4:05 PM - 7 August, 2009
About time we get that first win. This is without a doubt a totally different Yankee team this time around. I'm not happy with the 12 walks we gave up though. Boston looked tired and worn...they didn't have that look of confidence in them...I don't know.
I was laughing when I saw Yook out in left field. They can still use him as a DH if they sit Ortiz out...Ortiz was 0-5 last night!! I mean I know they love him and all but you would think that they would rather do that than completely fall out of the race.
I see this getting ugly for Boston really fast. Part 2 of the beating comes tonight...LOL
DPR250R 4:46 AM - 8 August, 2009
So... that must have been fun to watch for you Boston fans
DJ CISC0 4:48 AM - 8 August, 2009
WOOOOOOOWWWWW! Classic f*cking game! At least for the Yankees LMAO! Man, I love my team! Curse lives on FTW!!!

OK...back to my crates :)
DJ CISC0 4:51 AM - 8 August, 2009
Quote:
So... that must have been fun to watch for you Boston fans

They good. They're used to that :)
dj lad 6:39 PM - 8 August, 2009
Great game last night. Really was. Classic great pitching beating great hitting most of the game. Hats off to all pitchers. Hard to put a guy who was in AA three weeks ago in that position (Tazawa), but the Sox ran out of pitchers.
dj lad 6:40 PM - 8 August, 2009
As for Youkilis in LF - they had no choice. What should they have done? Youks to DH... with Bay hurt, Baldelli on the DL.... put Nick Green in LF? Reddick wasn't available at the start of the game.
dj lad 7:04 PM - 8 August, 2009
So FWIW:

Ortiz has tested clean 13 times since 2003. He said (like I expected him to) that he took stuff from GNC like Andro that wasn't banned by baseball but would still produce a positive test result. Then baseball banned it and he went off of it.

Manny was on an obvious cycling program and A-Rod was getting shots in his ass. Ortiz was basically drinking shakes from GNC. HUGE difference.
slimmjimm 7:59 PM - 8 August, 2009
<cough>bullshit<cough>

Manny was cycling, Arod got shots in the ass, and poor old Ortiz was just quenching his summer thirst with a milkshake? Please get serious.
DJ CISC0 3:04 AM - 10 August, 2009
Great baseball!! It's a wrap for the Sox at this point though. They are heading down the Mets path IMO.
Side note- How long was Dave Magadan the Sox batting coach? I still have doubles of his Topps "future stars" rookie card.
Oh yeah...That Ortiz interview was such a damn joke!
LOL. Joe Morgan was just knocking Mark Teixeira's stance....and how he leans on his back leg "hence" the reason why he only hits pop-ups. The next at bat (when MT hit the go ahead HR) ......JM was like "that's why he put it out for a HR because he has all his power on that back leg".....LOL, Joe Morgan is such a tool.
DJ CISC0 3:26 AM - 10 August, 2009
The sweep feels good. Watchwww.youtube.com
lvmez 3:45 PM - 10 August, 2009
red sox better hope they make the playoffs. the rangers and the rays are lurking.
DJ CISC0 8:48 PM - 10 August, 2009
Sweet! My boy just gave me some tickets for tonights game...good seats too.
lvmez 12:22 PM - 11 August, 2009
i was at last night's game too. mitre sucks.
DJ CISC0 2:17 PM - 11 August, 2009
Yeah Mitre sucks ass. Gave up 5 runs in 5 IP. Toronto's bullpen pretty much shut us down. I left right after the 7th though....I was sweating my nuts off in that humidity.
DJ CISC0 1:56 AM - 12 August, 2009
Boston is so upset about the sweep that they're starting brawls :)
uno seis 2:25 AM - 12 August, 2009
kevin youkilis is weeeeeeeak...even the mlb network studio announcers are making fun of him
DVDjHardy 2:44 AM - 12 August, 2009
Quote:
kevin youkilis is weeeeeeeak...even the mlb network studio announcers are making fun of him


Got thrown down to the ground by Porcello, who weighs may be 170 lbs soaked wet. They had that coming though...if you're gonna throw at our best hitter 2 nights in a row.
uno seis 2:55 AM - 12 August, 2009
and why the heck did he throw his helmet at porcello lol that was such a bitch move
DJ CISC0 3:13 AM - 12 August, 2009
^^^^^LOL! Werd...who throws a helmet at someone then gets slammed on his back?....LOL!
Best part is that he's going to be suspended a few games for that one.
lvmez 1:42 PM - 12 August, 2009
good win last night. johnny damon is having some season. they are going to have to resign him for next year. Matsui is soooo clutch, too bad he won't be coming back.
DVDjHardy 2:18 PM - 12 August, 2009
I'm hoping Tigers can sign Matsui for next year! Its weird that I hate the Yankees so much as a team, but really have always like so many of their players - Jeter, Mo, Matsui, Bernie (back in the day), RJ, etc....I guess I just hate Steinbrenner like the rest of the people with common sense. :P
DJ CISC0 2:51 PM - 12 August, 2009
^^^^LOL Hardy. I think a lot of people hate the Yankees because of the Steinbrenners.
I heard about the win last night but didn't see how they did it. I'm watching the encore from my desk right now. I have to admit though JD is having a great season so I can picture the Yankees giving him another year too. Matsui's problem from the jump has been staying healthy.....But when he is healthy...He's clutch!
DJ CISC0 4:36 PM - 18 August, 2009
O.K so it's starting to look like The Yankees might end up taking the East. Jeter breaks the record for most hits by a SS. The Yankees are having the best second half starts in Yankee history. Boston...well they need some help right now. They released Smoltz which was no brainer so they might shape up in time to make a run for the Wild Card if Tampa doesn't get hot and bumps them out of that race too.
DJ CISC0 3:32 PM - 21 August, 2009
I can easily see another sweep for the Yankees this weekend against Boston. We are just too hot right now.
dj lad 9:48 AM - 23 August, 2009
And the Sox win yesterday 14-1 and have Beckett going tonight.
dj lad 9:48 AM - 23 August, 2009
Oh, and Beckett > Sabathia.
DJ d.range 5:59 PM - 23 August, 2009
word and i'd rather lose 20-11, than 14-1
DJ CISC0 12:22 AM - 24 August, 2009
Oh snap lad is finally back...what's up dude? How are those Jeter stats coming along? LOL....Jeter is breaking all sorts of records this year.
Range--Didn't the Mets get shutout 11-0 by Atlanta the other day? And a loss is a loss however you look at it but whatever.
DJ CISC0 12:38 AM - 24 August, 2009
Quote:
Oh, and Beckett > Sabathia.
Ha...a little after I read this...2 HRs off of Beckett in 2 IP....just saying.
lvmez 1:56 AM - 24 August, 2009
yankees looking good tonight. arod with a bomb!
DJ CISC0 2:16 AM - 24 August, 2009
Quote:
yankees looking good tonight. arod with a bomb!
Yeah they really do. Beckett = 4 HRs, 7 Runs in 5IP so far....not a good look. I trying to figre out why he's still in the game.
Side note- Another reason why I can't stand Joe Morgan...When Cano dropped that ball he said the reason why was because Cano wasn't in control and over ran the ball. During the replays it was clear that Cano slipped on the dirt.
DJ CISC0 2:17 AM - 24 August, 2009
*figure
slimmjimm 4:18 AM - 24 August, 2009
Quote:
Oh, and Beckett > Sabathia.


Apparently not.

About Cano, I really think he should have let Tex taken that. He may have slid but he over ran then slid.
lvmez 12:24 PM - 24 August, 2009
even though we are ahead of the bosox, i think we will be helping them this week. if we beat up on texas and they win, they can secure the wild card. double edge sword.
slimmjimm 1:56 PM - 24 August, 2009
I hate series like that, but the wild card race is just a tiny bit tighter than the division, and there are still plenty of games left.
DJ CISC0 3:06 PM - 24 August, 2009
Quote:
even though we are ahead of the bosox, i think we will be helping them this week. if we beat up on texas and they win, they can secure the wild card. double edge sword.
Not if Tampa beats up on Toronto too. IMO I can't picture Boston even being in the wildcard picture if they continue playing like they are. They threw out their best pitcher last night and he got owned. Still don't get why they left him out there for 7 runs but whatever. It reminded me of when Joe Torre used to leave pitchers out there to get abused.
dj lad 6:48 AM - 27 August, 2009
I'll still take Beckett over Sabathia any day of the week. Look at their career records and their records in the playoffs. Plus... Sabathia is a 300 pound dude.... 300 pound guys in baseball don't tend to hold up for a long time.
DJ CISC0 4:08 PM - 27 August, 2009
O.K so I looked up the stats....
Career
Both have 9 seasons but CC pitched almost 500 innings MORE...that's crazy.

CC = 1,844 IP--132(W)-80(L)
Beckett = 1,359 IP--103(W)-67(L)

Seems like the 300 pound dude is simply a workhorse.

Post season
CC only pitched in 5 games versus Beckett's 13 so with that right there it's hard to say who I would choose in the post season. PLUS the 12 ER in the 07 ALCS really messed up CC.
DVDjHardy 4:59 PM - 27 August, 2009
If you've seen Beckett pitch in the post season, it's not hard to pick him over ANY pitcher out there!
DJ CISC0 5:20 PM - 27 August, 2009
I'm not saying that he isn't good in the post season....shoooot...he owned the Yanks in 03 when he pitched for Florida.
DPR250R 5:40 PM - 27 August, 2009
Quote:
If you've seen Beckett pitch in the post season, it's not hard to pick him over ANY pitcher out there!



I can still hate him though... I am a pretty rational easy going guy but he finds a way to bother me.

For some reason "turd" is always what comes to mind when I see him.

As much as I despise him... the league is better with him around. Cause when the Yanks beat him it is that much sweeter... but when they loose to him it really sucks... lol... isn't that what being a sports fan is all about???
DJ CISC0 5:49 PM - 27 August, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
If you've seen Beckett pitch in the post season, it's not hard to pick him over ANY pitcher out there!



I can still hate him though... I am a pretty rational easy going guy but he finds a way to bother me.

For some reason "turd" is always what comes to mind when I see him.
LOL!!! What makes it even worse is that he's usually cool, calm and collected when he owns. I never liked him for what he did in that WS when he was with Florida so signing with Boston only seemed fitting.
DPR250R 12:20 PM - 28 August, 2009
We sucked it up yesterday!

I just got my Boston cap out....
DJ CISC0 7:58 PM - 6 September, 2009
Today's Yankee game is a total disaster. Walking in 3 runs in one inning, hitting batters in the face, slamming into each other in the outfield....LOL It can't get any worse.
DJ CISC0 3:48 AM - 7 September, 2009
The best thing about it is that Boston will not smell the playoffs...you heard it here first.
DPR250R 2:00 PM - 7 September, 2009
I don't know... I won't say anything til they are eliminated.

Remember the Mets?
DVDjHardy 5:49 PM - 7 September, 2009
We finally won and swept a series on the road. Been almost 4 months since it last happened. LOL
DJ CISC0 4:37 AM - 10 September, 2009
WOW...Yanks are on a tear and there is no stopping us. DJ hits to tie Lou Gehrig's record! It's an amazing (no Mets) year without a doubt and I hope I didn't just jinx it. Hey, it's baseball so who the hell knows what can happen.
DJ CISC0 4:37 AM - 10 September, 2009
Quote:
Remember the Mets?
Who are they again?
DJ CISC0 4:41 AM - 10 September, 2009
Quote:
We finally won and swept a series on the road. Been almost 4 months since it last happened. LOL
Detroit's looking like they have a little something in them too Hardy....Lad, how them stats looking for the Sox?
DJ CISC0 12:04 AM - 26 September, 2009
It's on this weekend !
DPR250R 12:07 AM - 26 September, 2009
Indeed.....
DJ CISC0 12:14 AM - 26 September, 2009
Lester is looking bad out there right now.
DJ CISC0 12:15 AM - 26 September, 2009
Ouch!
DPR250R 5:40 AM - 26 September, 2009
Shit was scary man.... if it was Beckett I would have laughed.. but I like Lester...

hope he is ok.....
DVDjHardy 7:55 AM - 26 September, 2009
Quote:
Detroit's looking like they have a little something in them too Hardy....Lad, how them stats looking for the Sox?


Take that back! Ever since you said that, we've been getting killed! LOL

Its really the only exciting penant race left in baseball. Tigers vs. Twins.
slimmjimm 9:39 PM - 27 September, 2009
AL East and home field!
DJ CISC0 11:49 PM - 27 September, 2009
Hell yeah...Nice Boston sweep too! Couldn't have asked for a better way to end the season.

Hardy- Detroit is still hanging in there man :)
DJ CISC0 5:14 AM - 30 September, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
Detroit's looking like they have a little something in them too Hardy....Lad, how them stats looking for the Sox?


Take that back! Ever since you said that, we've been getting killed! LOL

Its really the only exciting penant race left in baseball. Tigers vs. Twins.
Good games vs the Twins so far. Ooops, shouldn't have said anything.

Side Note* I can't stand the fact that the red sox is going to be in the playoffs....I mean, this is why I hate the Wild Card. Thanks to TB playing shitty ball after the break.
DVDjHardy 1:11 PM - 30 September, 2009
You hate the Sox being in the playoffs b/c you're scared of them! haha

Yeah, yesterday wasn't so bad after all...no ground lost to the Twins and fewer games to make up the 2 game difference. In my book, if the Tigers win one of the next two against the Twins, they'll make it. Ideally, they should win both and then they can rest their big arms for the playoffs. But that's just not likely with his team. I'm expecting this to be decided Saturday or Sunday.
dj lad 3:47 PM - 30 September, 2009
The Wildcard is the best thing that Selig has done, without question.

Meanwhile, if CC Sabathia wins the Cy Young over Greinke, or if Derek Jeter wins the MVP over Mauer, I'm going to fucking shoot someone.

I'd like to hear an actual argument to be made for either CC or Jeter.
dj lad 3:58 PM - 30 September, 2009
BTW:

Greinke has 3 less wins on a team that will win 40 less games, while posting an ERA that's 30 (THIRTY!) earned runs better and while striking out 40 more. And the lowest HR/9 rate in the league. He's literally having a Pedro season.

Mauer is putting up the best AVG, OBP, SLG, in the AL. He's playing top-notch defense and is carrying that offense, especially since Morneau is done. The difference in Win Shares between Mauer and Jeter is the same as Jeter and Jacoby Ellsbury. Oh yeah - and Jeter is 7th (!) on his own team in OPS among regulars. He's 8th in home runs, and while he does lead his own team in AVG and OBP, he's 8th in SLG. Derek Jeter, simply put, isn't even the MVP of his own team.

Joe Mauer is putting up the best numbers by a catcher in the last decade, possibly ever. Legitimately. He's 30 OPS+ points ahead of 2nd place (Teixeira, who is the real MVP candidate on the Yankees).
DVDjHardy 3:58 PM - 30 September, 2009
Yep, there's no way CC or anyone else should be even considered. Greinke should be unanimous.
uno seis 4:24 PM - 30 September, 2009
the only thing jeter has going is that he's actually been a really good defensive shortstop this year and combined with his nice offensive numbers as a SS...he is at least worthy of a small argument...but yeah Mauer should be the MVP.
DPR250R 4:46 PM - 30 September, 2009
Quote:
The Wildcard is the best thing that Selig has done, without question.

Meanwhile, if CC Sabathia wins the Cy Young over Greinke, or if Derek Jeter wins the MVP over Mauer, I'm going to fucking shoot someone.

I'd like to hear an argument to be made for either CC or Jeter.


Because they are Yankees.
DJ CISC0 5:05 PM - 30 September, 2009
Quote:
You hate the Sox being in the playoffs b/c you're scared of them! haha
Actually, I'm more afraid of the Angels. I would like to see another do or die matchup between the Yanks and Boston.

Quote:
The Wildcard is the best thing that Selig has done, without question.
You mean to tell me that a team that ends up with the 4th best record in the league and ends up winning the WS is fair to the rest of the teams who has held on their top spots all season??
uno seis 5:08 PM - 30 September, 2009
Quote:
You mean to tell me that a team that ends up with the 4th best record in the league and ends up winning the WS is fair to the rest of the teams who has held on their top spots all season??


yes. its not like the nba or nhl where half the league makes the playoffs.
DJ CISC0 5:11 PM - 30 September, 2009
Quote:
Because they are Yankees.
LOL

/argument
DJ d.range 5:33 PM - 30 September, 2009
lets go mets!
DVDjHardy 6:02 PM - 30 September, 2009
Mauer hasn't been playing half of his games at a gimmicky park all year. ;)
dj lad 6:36 PM - 30 September, 2009
Quote:
The Wildcard is the best thing that Selig has done, without question.
You mean to tell me that a team that ends up with the 4th best record in the league and ends up winning the WS is fair to the rest of the teams who has held on their top spots all season??
What?
That makes no sense. It's not the 4th best record, even. In fact, the Red Sox are going to have at the very least, the 3rd best record in the AL. In 2008, the WC had the 3rd best. In 2007, the WC was tied for 3rd. In 2006, was 3rd. Do you see my point?

The WC allows for more competition and more worthy teams to make the playoffs.
dj lad 6:38 PM - 30 September, 2009
Like I said, it's Greinke and Mauer, and there's really no competition at either one. There is no logical argument to be made in favor of any other player.
DJ CISC0 7:26 PM - 30 September, 2009
I know what you mean but I always looked at it as 4th best. The way I see it is if you win your division you're first.....so the wildcard looks like 4th best in my eyes when you exclude the first place winners. The wildcard doesn't make for better competition...it's more of a free pass. If you want real comp you take the top 4 teams regardless of divisions. I mean why even have divisions then right? Just make it American League vs. National league and have your top 4 teams at the end of the year enter the playoffs.

I look back at 97 and 03 and as a Yankee fan...that was wack. It makes sense that you would have a different look at the wildcard being that Boston did benefit from it in 04.
DJ CISC0 9:16 PM - 30 September, 2009
I had to look this stat up. Since it started in 1995, Boston has the most wildcard appearances with 7! LOL...no wonder you support this so much.
dj lad 9:29 PM - 30 September, 2009
That has nothing to do with why I like it.

It rewards good play. Sometimes teams win 103 games and don't make the playoffs (see the 1993 Giants). They should have been a playoff team. It's not a free pass at all. If you're in a division with a team that has a 100 win season and you have a 95 win season, good enough to win other divisions - how is that a free pass? You played great - good enough to be a playoff team.

Sorry if you don't like it, but it sounds like you have serious sour grapes about it since the Yankees have lost to so many Wild Card teams.

It's stupid to look at it as 4th best. Look at records - that's what matters. And, actually, I'm all for getting rid of divisions. I think the divisional alignment creates unfair scheduling (the Blue Jays would probably have won the AL Central this year and made the playoffs last year if not in the AL East). I say make it 2 big divisions and have everyone play the same schedule - that's how it used to be anyway.

I think they SHOULD make it so the WC team only gets 1 home game in a 5-game series, but that's something else altogether.
uno seis 9:50 PM - 30 September, 2009
Quote:


It's stupid to look at it as 4th best. Look at records - that's what matters. And, actually, I'm all for getting rid of divisions. I think the divisional alignment creates unfair scheduling (the Blue Jays would probably have won the AL Central this year and made the playoffs last year if not in the AL East). I say make it 2 big divisions and have everyone play the same schedule - that's how it used to be anyway.

I think they SHOULD make it so the WC team only gets 1 home game in a 5-game series, but that's something else altogether.


didn't they change to the "unbalanced" schedule so that teams would play their division rivals more often? this seemingly made things more interesting for the fans in mlb's mind...
DVDjHardy 12:59 AM - 1 October, 2009
Yo, I love the divisions! My team would have no shot right now if it was the 4 best records in the AL...haha!

And I just wanna give mad props to Eddiet Bonine...AAA call up from Toledo who is outpitching Pavano (4-0 against Tigers this season - w/ CLE & MIN). Watch out Yankees, we're coming for you!

I'm going to tomorrow and hoping that they beat the Twins so I can pop some champagne!!! :)
DJ CISC0 1:21 AM - 1 October, 2009
It's 4th best however you look at it lad. You can sit here all day and say that a wc team played hard all season long etc, etc...But the fact still remains that they didn't play hard enough to win in their OWN division so why give they new life?

Uno- Selig put this into the game to make it look like they really cared about its fans and their teams. I always felt that it was a way to change things up a bit being that they lost so many fans after the strike...including myself for a little bit. Never forget that Selig thinks about money, mlb, owners, and then their fans...in that order.

I highly doubt that anything will change anytime soon especially regarding the divisions and scheduling....With FOX, ESPN, YES, etc all out to get those ratings and paper....the scheduling will never be right.
DJ CISC0 1:25 AM - 1 October, 2009
Also, I am looking at records...I see 3 winners in 3 different divisions who won their divisions FIRST.... then I see the WC winner.
dj lad 5:34 AM - 1 October, 2009
I'm sorry, but it's not 4th best. You are simply wrong, Cisco. I'm sorry. And I'll show you why.

I know you think my feeling about the WC stem from the Sox, but they don't. The WC makes for a better playoffs as it allows better teams to get into the show. Since 1995 (the start of WC play) 19 of the 27 teams that won the WC were not the 4th best team in their league. So you tell me - what makes for better competition? Allowing the better teams in the postseason or not? I would think that having better teams and better competition would be a good thing. In fact we haven't had a team in 2000s (outside of the 2005 3-way tie) where the 4th best team by winning pct was the Wild Card team. That's how wrong you are.

Want to hear something amazing? Since 2004, there have been 12 wild card teams - only ONE of them had the 4th best record (2004 Astros). In 2005, 3 teams (Sox, Yankees, Angels) had the same record. I don't know about the 2009 NL WC yet but right now the Rockies have the same record as the Cardinals.

It has nothing to do with winning their own division, that's the thing. You want the best teams in the playoffs. The Wild Card ALLOWS for the best teams to make the playoffs (as I have shown to you), despite possibly playing in a division where team outspends everyone else by at least close to a 2:1 ratio. Or it allows a team like the Rockies, who have had an absurdly good record since June 1st, to make the playoffs.

Look at strength of schedule. Teams in the AL East beat the shit out of each other all season - hell, even Baltimore wasn't horrible outside of the AL East (40-50). Toronto was a 49-41 team when not playing the AL East.

I believe that the Red Sox are in fact the 2nd best in baseball, behind the Yankees. Then the Angels. Then pick your favorite NL team, but even then I might put the Rays or Tigers next. As I said, last year the four best teams in baseball were in the AL East - Rays, Red Sox, Yankees, and Blue Jays. You can put the Phillies 5th if you'd like, but I might put the Angels ahead of them.

I'm sorry Cisco, but you're simply wrong about this one. You aren't looking at the facts here - the fact is that more often that not (70% of the time) the worst team in a league to make the playoffs is not a Wild Card team. It's a division "winner".
uno seis 3:54 PM - 1 October, 2009
Yes, what lad said. Not always 4th best.
DJ CISC0 8:46 PM - 1 October, 2009
OK... "technically" it's not 4th best but I still "see it" like that. Put it like this...the WC in my eyes only rewards mediocrity at best. If you can't put together a good ballclub in 162 games good enough to win your division then you don't belong in the playoffs...period. You have 7 months to make trades, bring guys up and down, etc....Then you have teams that get into a late hot streak and bam they're in the playoffs. Lad, what would've been a sweeter victory in 04? Boston coming back to win the division AND the WS? Or, winning the WC and winning the WS? They should start making WC banners so teams can hold ceremonies the next year when they hang them up...LOL. Seriously, since 95 which pennant race was actually a good classic one to watch or follow? They don't exist anymore.

It has EVERYTHING to do with winning your division...why do you think they even made division in the first place? If it was about the top teams then why did they change it to begin with?

So you say it brings more excitement for other cities that played good and didn't win their division? Then might as well add another few playoffs slots then...right? Why leave other cities out that played their hardest but came up half a game shy of the WC? I mean lets add some more WC slots or another division so we can have "the best teams" compete. Where does the line get drawn to determine the "real top teams"?
dj lad 11:46 PM - 1 October, 2009
But it's NOT mediocrity, Cisco! I mean, how much clearer could this be? 70% of the WC teams have been better than a division winner! That's the very definition of NOT mediocre! The WC allows for teams who are in a division with a huge spender or a juggernaut who STILL win 95 games to make the playoffs!! I mean in 2001, the Mariners won 116 games and the A's still won 102 -- are you telling me the A's didn't deserve to make the playoffs winning 102 games? There is no logical argument to make that that says that winning 102 games shouldn't get you into the playoffs. NONE. You cannot make a cogent or realistic argument otherwise, unless you think that the we should switch back to having just the best team in each league make the WS and that's it.

There have been plenty of good pennant races since 1995 - if you aren't looking, then you're insane. Mets/Phillies in 2007, Mets/Phillies in 2008 (sorry Mets fans), the Padres/Rockies in 2007 (one game playoff!), Twins/White Sox in 2008 (another one game playoff) - that's just the last two seasons! I mean, pay attention, man.

They made divisions because of time zones and game start times. It's really that simple. There wasn't a need for divisions when all the teams were east of the Rockies. You couldn't have the Mariners in the same time zone as the Marlins (although for a while the Braves were in the West but that was tied to when they were in Milwaukee).

Like it or not, the WC is a good thing. It allows for better teams to make the playoffs. You don't seem to like it, and I'm guessing that has to do with the Red Sox and Marlins winning the WS after making it as a WC.
slimmjimm 3:41 AM - 2 October, 2009
I agree. I like the WC and I really do think it makes October more exciting. I can see the argument about being 4th best, but the only way to get rid of that stigma is to have 4 divisions, and hopefully that type of clusterfuck wouldn't happen.

On that note, GO YANKEES!
dj lad 9:10 AM - 2 October, 2009
You add 2 teams to the AL and you can do it. 4 divisions per league, 4 teams per division. Hell you can even do it like the NFL does it - 2 WC teams per league/conference. Players association would have no problem with two teams being added - that means 50 more jobs for players.
DJ d.range 1:28 PM - 2 October, 2009
and then baseball could go into December!
DJ CISC0 2:36 PM - 2 October, 2009
Quote:
are you telling me the A's didn't deserve to make the playoffs winning 102 games? .
No. Tough luck if they couldn't win their division. It sucks for sure....but that's the rules man. I mean one can probably argue that 95 games is good enough to make the playoffs too.
Quote:
There have been plenty of good pennant races since 1995 - if you aren't looking, then you're insane. Mets/Phillies in 2007, Mets/Phillies in 2008 (sorry Mets fans), the Padres/Rockies in 2007 (one game playoff!), Twins/White Sox in 2008 (another one game playoff) - that's just the last two seasons! I mean, pay attention, man.
These won't go down as classics. Exciting? Sure...but not classics. I'm talking about 87 Tigers, 78 Sox/Yanks(Bucky Dent....sorry sox fans)...Games like those. Those were classics.
Quote:
Like it or not, the WC is a good thing. It allows for better teams to make the playoffs. You don't seem to like it, and I'm guessing that has to do with the Red Sox and Marlins winning the WS after making it as a WC.
Fine, look at it from your point of view and I'll look at it from mine. Honestly, I was never a fan of most of the changes in baseball...interleague play, expansion teams, moving teams from AL to NL...and the WC. It just so happens that we were beaten by both WC winners and expansion teams.
DJ CISC0 2:40 PM - 2 October, 2009
Quote:
Hell you can even do it like the NFL does it - 2 WC teams per league/conference. Players association would have no problem with two teams being added - that means 50 more jobs for players.
The reason I feel like this won't work in baseball is because there's 162 games to be played...that's more then enough games. It's a better fit for the NFL since they only have 16 games a season.
dj lad 5:29 PM - 2 October, 2009
You don't think the biggest collapse in baseball history (07 Mets/Phillies) qualifies as classic?
uno seis 5:36 PM - 2 October, 2009
that padres rockies one game playoff was a classic game too, they showed it on espn classic that same week lol
DJ d.range 5:44 PM - 2 October, 2009
didn't the Mets have a 1 game playoff in '99?
DJ CISC0 6:19 PM - 2 October, 2009
07 Mets/Phillies wasn't a race though but t was fun to watch it happen :) And I'm not to crazy about 1 game playoffs....it's almost like tossing a coin in the air.
DJ CISC0 6:21 PM - 2 October, 2009
Quote:
didn't the Mets have a 1 game playoff in '99?
Yep...then they lost the NLCS to the Braves :)
uno seis 6:32 PM - 2 October, 2009
Quote:
07 Mets/Phillies wasn't a race though but t was fun to watch it happen :) And I'm not to crazy about 1 game playoffs....it's almost like tossing a coin in the air.

actually its pretty much the polar opposite of a coin toss since they actually settle it on the field
DVDjHardy 6:47 PM - 2 October, 2009
So everyone but Cisco thinks its a good idea to have a WC, haha.
DJ CISC0 8:21 PM - 2 October, 2009
^ Guess so :)
Quote:
Quote:
07 Mets/Phillies wasn't a race though but t was fun to watch it happen :) And I'm not to crazy about 1 game playoffs....it's almost like tossing a coin in the air.

actually its pretty much the polar opposite of a coin toss since they actually settle it on the field
True. But then again...I'm not a fan of the 1 game playoff or the best of 5. I would rather see the best of 7 and have it come down to a game 7.
dj lad 10:21 PM - 3 October, 2009
I'm actually not a best of 5 fan either - it becomes too easy for a team to get an upset. That said, after 162 games if the teams are tied, playing 1 game to determine a winner is WAY better than 7 game series between them.
dj lad 1:15 AM - 4 October, 2009
Yeah, too bad there are no good pennant races left.

:: looks at the NL Central ::
dj lad 1:15 AM - 4 October, 2009
crap, :: AL Central ::
DVDjHardy 7:14 AM - 4 October, 2009
:(
dj lad 9:28 AM - 4 October, 2009
Hardy, WTF.
DJ CISC0 6:28 PM - 4 October, 2009
Quote:
I'm actually not a best of 5 fan either - it becomes too easy for a team to get an upset. That said, after 162 games if the teams are tied, playing 1 game to determine a winner is WAY better than 7 game series between them.
Huh? Explain how playing 3 out of 5 is WAY easier to get an upset than a 1 game playoff?
DJ CISC0 6:30 PM - 4 October, 2009
Quote:
:(
LOL! Damn dude...I would like Detroit to pull through though.
dj lad 6:36 PM - 5 October, 2009
I think a 7 game series is optimal. But asking two teams to play a 7 game series JUST to get into the playoff is unreasonable and a bad idea (the other 7 playoff teams have to wait a week and a half to play again? Horrible idea.) That's why it makes sense to have the 1-game playoff to determine who gets into the playoffs. I wish all rounds of the actual playoffs were 7 games though.
DVDjHardy 6:50 PM - 5 October, 2009
Fucking Tigers. Unlikely, but I hope they beat the shit out of Twins. If good pitching is supposed to beat good hitting, we have a good shot.
DJ CISC0 7:28 PM - 5 October, 2009
I hate hearing the media say shit like the Twins "hot streak". I mean it's just 2 games in a row. How are they so "hot"?
DVDjHardy 7:44 PM - 5 October, 2009
Quote:
I hate hearing the media say shit like the Twins "hot streak". I mean it's just 2 games in a row. How are they so "hot"?


Won about 80-90% of their gams in the last month or so....
uno seis 8:34 PM - 5 October, 2009
well not quite that blistering hot hardy, but they did close out the season on a 12-4 run which is pretty damn good
DVDjHardy 8:41 PM - 5 October, 2009
Ok, 75%, but they went on a tear. And it helped that the Tigers can't find a way to beat them.

And then this - detnews.com - what a douchebag.
DJ CISC0 9:45 PM - 5 October, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
I hate hearing the media say shit like the Twins "hot streak". I mean it's just 2 games in a row. How are they so "hot"?


Won about 80-90% of their gams in the last month or so....
Ah OK. I thought they were just referring to the series.
DVDjHardy 11:57 PM - 6 October, 2009
If you guys love baseball and you're missing this Tigers @ Twins game, you lose. Its been an amazing game....let's go Tigers!!!!!
DJ CISC0 2:00 AM - 7 October, 2009
Damn dude. I was trying not to say anything cause I didn't want to jinx it again. It did look like a good game though. I was following it through espn gamecast.
DPR250R 12:12 PM - 7 October, 2009
One of the best games all year!!!

Sorry Hardy... was hoping the Tigers would pull it off.....
DVDjHardy 1:14 PM - 7 October, 2009
Yeah, I'm really upset that they lost, but at the same time...it couldn't have been a better game. Instant classic, everything you can ask for...probably the best baseball game I've ever seen.
DPR250R 1:15 PM - 7 October, 2009
Quote:
...probably the best baseball game I've ever seen.


It's def up there!!!
uno seis 3:37 PM - 7 October, 2009
i enjoy this miguel cabrera-related pic

deadspin.com
DJ CISC0 3:24 AM - 8 October, 2009
Quote:
Meanwhile, if CC Sabathia wins the Cy Young over Greinke, or if Derek Jeter wins the MVP over Mauer, I'm going to fucking shoot someone.
LOL! It's so funny you say that.

BTW...I'm not so sure about C.C but, Jeter SHOULD and most likely WILL get it just on the fact that he passed LG with hits. IMO Jeter IS the Yankees and I'm just glad I lived to watch him do his thing over the years. There is no one on the Sox that can even come close to Jeter's legacy and what he has brought to the Yanks and the game.
DJ d.range 3:27 AM - 8 October, 2009
Quote:
There is no one on the Sox that can even come close to Jeter's legacy and what he has brought to the Yanks and the game.


nobody compared him to anyone on the sox... why do yankees fans always do that?
DJ CISC0 3:34 AM - 8 October, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
There is no one on the Sox that can even come close to Jeter's legacy and what he has brought to the Yanks and the game.


nobody compared him to anyone on the sox... why do yankees fans always do that?
I'm just saying...it just seems like Lad always seems to find a way to not give credit where credit's due when it comes to Yankee players....scroll up and check it.
DJ CISC0 3:36 AM - 8 October, 2009
Sorry, Lad AND Red Sax fans.
DVDjHardy 1:19 PM - 8 October, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
There is no one on the Sox that can even come close to Jeter's legacy and what he has brought to the Yanks and the game.


nobody compared him to anyone on the sox... why do yankees fans always do that?


Because Rox this decade: 2
Yankees this decade: 0

Btw, Jeter is one of my fav players ever...but if he or anyone else wins MVP over Mauer - I will personally beat the crap out of everyone who voted for anyone besides Mauer. Same for Greinke.
uno seis 3:30 PM - 8 October, 2009
Mauer is the AL mvp. Jeter might not even be mvp on his own team, who cares if he "is" the yankees or if he passed Lou Gehrig in hits
DPR250R 3:44 PM - 8 October, 2009
What's the criteria for MVP?
uno seis 4:08 PM - 8 October, 2009
There is no criteria, which is why we can have all of these really fun arguments. On one hand, you have people with STATS who will argue for Joe Mauer because he was the best hitter in the league, and as a catcher, he was incredibly valuable.

On the other hand, you have idiot sportswriters and Yankee fans who will argue that Derek Jeter is somehow the league MVP because he "is a true leader" (whatever that means) and wears the pinstripes and passed Lou Gehrig on the all-time Yankees hits list.
DJ CISC0 4:16 PM - 8 October, 2009
I love it when the Yankees do something great.....the typical responses from haters are "who cares" or "that argument is so old"...LOL...I love it.
uno seis 4:18 PM - 8 October, 2009
passing lou gehrig is a great accomplishment, but it has nothing to do with being league mvp
DJ d.range 4:59 PM - 8 October, 2009
^^^^^^
especially b/c him passing lou gehrig is an an acomplishment that took years to achieve... what if he needed only one hit to pass Lou, and thats all he got was one hit this season, does that make him mvp?
DJ CISC0 8:33 PM - 8 October, 2009
OK so what makes a MVP? A player who helps a team get the best record for the season and the playoffs?....Or a player who helps a team barely make the playoffs?
uno seis 8:37 PM - 8 October, 2009
the questions that you are asking depends entirely on the teammates of each respective player. jeter obviously has better teammates. using your logic, mauer is far and away the mvp.
uno seis 8:44 PM - 8 October, 2009
one thing that i mentioned earlier that may be missed here is that jeter is actually a good mvp candidate BECAUSE of his offensive and defensive stats. its not because his superior yankeeness led the yankees to the best record in the league or some other nonsensical answer that the media likes to popularize.
lvmez 8:53 PM - 8 October, 2009
i was at the game last night. all around good solid game for the yanks. i was little upset on how many empty seats there were. even though they were probably sold out, people just didn't show. it also very cold. i'm probably going to game 2 as well. i think we are sweeping. twins look tired. the one guy on that team that is under rated is orlando cabrrera.
dj lad 11:04 PM - 8 October, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
Meanwhile, if CC Sabathia wins the Cy Young over Greinke, or if Derek Jeter wins the MVP over Mauer, I'm going to fucking shoot someone.
LOL! It's so funny you say that.

BTW...I'm not so sure about C.C but, Jeter SHOULD and most likely WILL get it just on the fact that he passed LG with hits. IMO Jeter IS the Yankees and I'm just glad I lived to watch him do his thing over the years. There is no one on the Sox that can even come close to Jeter's legacy and what he has brought to the Yanks and the game.

Why the FUCK should Derek Jeter get the MVP??? Because he passed Gehrig? Why does that make him an MVP? That's the most backwards, insipid argument I've ever read. Congrats. For fuck's sake, CC, Teixeira, and Rivera are all better picks on his own team!

For fuck's sake, Joe Mauer just had, maybe, the best year ever for a catcher. Ever. He played top notch defense and led the league in AVG, OBP, SLG. As a catcher. He hit more homers, had more doubles, had a better BB/PA, BB/K, more total bases, and practically willed a team to the playoffs on his own (considering he lost the 2nd best hitter on his team a month ago). Jeter had more hits and more steals and played average defense - Mauer played elite defense at the hardest position to play.

Plus, Mauer made this ad a while ago:
Watchwww.youtube.com

And no, there isn't anyone on the Sox currently who can match Jeter's "legacy" in the game. So? Cisco, you don't seem to follow - this isn't an insult to Derek Jeter that he didn't have as good a year as Mauer. It's just simple fact -- I'm not saying Jeter is a shitty ballplayer. And I'm more than willing to give Yankee players credit where it is due, that's been shown time and time again in this thread. But I also call it like I see it - and I called Wang pretty damn well. I was wrong about Cano regressing, but I'm still not sold on him - his walk rate is so poor (only 30 walks this year) and it's hard to maintain being a good hitter when your production is so based on average.

I was, I'm happy to say, wrong about Joba. Other than his ERA, his rate stats were eerily similar to Buchholz last year.
DJ CISC0 4:46 PM - 9 October, 2009
Well yeah on record Mauer does put up better numbers. BUT stats aren't the only thing the voters look at when deciding. It's just the way it is unfortunately. See Morneau over Jeter and Howard over Pujols in '06. By the way Howard and the Phillies didn't even make it into the playoffs! LOL! It's almost if the voting is done on a curve.

Lad-You were also wrong about Burnett, Jeter, A-Rod, and Posada. Just saying.

The Mets vs. Angels game last night was great by the way. It almost looked like I was watching a comedy movie! Wait that wasn't the Mets...
DJ CISC0 5:14 PM - 9 October, 2009
And how come I never seen this video before....it's the funniest shit ever!!!!
Watchwww.youtube.com
lvmez 3:21 AM - 10 October, 2009
great game tonight! arod looking clutch!!!
DJ CISC0 5:09 PM - 10 October, 2009
Last nights game was insane on so many levels. This game had a little bit of everything...blown calls, walk off hr, odd double play to end the rally, etc..etc. A-Rod finally comes through in the post season. Robertson getting out of the bases loaded no outs jam was also big! So much happened in this game.

They really need to do something about these umps. Obviously the Yanks benefited from last nights blown call (ground rule double that was called foul) but as a Twin fan I would be pissed! At least have instant replay for the post season.
DJ CISC0 8:50 PM - 11 October, 2009
Tough loss for the Sox. Papelbon couldn't hold on to the 2 run lead to save the game so the Sox get swept. I guess that's what happens when a team only gets 15 in the whole series.
dj lad 4:59 AM - 12 October, 2009
Quote:
Well yeah on record Mauer does put up better numbers. BUT stats aren't the only thing the voters look at when deciding. It's just the way it is unfortunately. See Morneau over Jeter and Howard over Pujols in '06. By the way Howard and the Phillies didn't even make it into the playoffs! LOL! It's almost if the voting is done on a curve.

Lad-You were also wrong about Burnett, Jeter, A-Rod, and Posada. Just saying.

The Mets vs. Angels game last night was great by the way. It almost looked like I was watching a comedy movie! Wait that wasn't the Mets...

Whoa, whoa, whoa. Hold on here. First off, Morneau shouldn't have won that MVP - but neither should Jeter. Mauer should have won that year - almost any year where a catcher gives you a 430 OBP, they should be the MVP, especially when they play elite defense. Any voter who actually says that Derek Jeter was a better player this year than Joe Mauer NEEDS to get their head checked. Because simply put - he was not. There is no argument you can make otherwise (and no, breaking Gehrig's record does not count as an argument). And for the record, I think Posada probably should have gotten 3rd place in the 2007 MVP voting behind A-Rod and Ordonez. Maybe even 2nd.

In 2006 you can make the argument for Howard over Pujols - it's not a great argument, but you can make it. Voters often get hung up on the triple crown stats - and Howard beat Pujols at HR and RBI - and hit 313. In fact, that year, Howard became one of 10 players in baseball history (Sosa, Ruth, Foxx, Howard, Greenberg, Arod, Luis Gonzalez, Junior Griffey, Hack Wilson, and George Foster) to hit 300 with 50 homers and 140 RBI in a season. I think Pujols probably deserved it, but it's hardly a robbery.

How was I wrong about Burnett? I said that he's had health problems - this is fact. I said I wouldn't trust him to be healthy, and I still wouldn't.

I'll cop to being wrong about the Yankee offense, but no one expected Yankee Stadium 3 to become a friggin launching pad. And no one expected Jorge Posada to put up numbers like that at 37 (and he did only play 111 games). Nobody thought the Yankees would hit 244 homers this year - not even you Cisco.

I'm disappointed in the way the season ended. I was on a plane coming back from a gig and turned my phone off with 2 outs in the 9th with no one on base. We landed, turned my phone and I crapped my pants.
dj lad 5:02 AM - 12 October, 2009
FWIW Posada's season this year was one of the best ever by a 37 year old catcher. In terms of post-expansion era guys (1954-now), only one other catcher has put up comparable seasons, and that's Fisk. And Fisk played til he was 45. He caught 143 games at 43. I don't see Posada holding up that well, but who knows.
lvmez 6:44 PM - 12 October, 2009
yankees in 6 against angels.

red sox look bad. they look old.
DPR250R 7:42 PM - 12 October, 2009
Quote:
yankees in 6 against angels.


Hmmm.... I hope... Angels are real tough for the Yanks.

Jeter should pull the team through though.... that's why he is the MVP.
DJ CISC0 8:43 PM - 12 October, 2009
WOW! What a sweet birthday weekend for me...Sox get swept and sent home, Yanks sweep to advance, Giants stomp the Raiders, and Pats lose in O.T. OK so this Yanks/Angels matchup should be a nice one. Yanks in 5.....yeah 5.

Lad- I was just using Morneau and Howard to prove that the MVP winners doesn't always have the better stats. LOL@ "launching pad"...Yeah 244 HRs is a crazy shitload of HRs but I think that would've happened at the old park. Well, maybe not 244 but close to it. Everyone was on their A game this year, pitchers (except Wang), big bats coming through...especially in the clutch which seemed like it never happened last year...etc. But yes, Jorge SHOCKED me this year without a doubt. I think the presence of Molina got him thinking differently this year like "damn, I'm not going to be playing this game for much longer"..who knows.

Quote:
I'm disappointed in the way the season ended. I was on a plane coming back from a gig and turned my phone off with 2 outs in the 9th with no one on base. We landed, turned my phone and I crapped my pants.
LOL!
DJ CISC0 9:15 PM - 12 October, 2009
Quote:
I just took a $100 dollar bet with my barber that the Yankees end up getting farther than the Sox.

Money in the bank for me.
Time to stop by the barbershop this weekend :)
dj lad 6:34 AM - 13 October, 2009
Quote:
Lad- I was just using Morneau and Howard to prove that the MVP winners doesn't always have the better stats. LOL@ "launching pad"...Yeah 244 HRs is a crazy shitload of HRs but I think that would've happened at the old park. Well, maybe not 244 but close to it. Everyone was on their A game this year, pitchers (except Wang), big bats coming through...especially in the clutch which seemed like it never happened last year...etc. But yes, Jorge SHOCKED me this year without a doubt. I think the presence of Molina got him thinking differently this year like "damn, I'm not going to be playing this game for much longer"..who knows.

You're not following though - the Morneau/Howard argument is at least one where the winner wasn't a complete robbery. Morneau and Howard were both very good and there are actual arguments to make about them winning.

Using the value determinant of batting runs above average (just batting, since fielding runs doesn't exist for catchers), Mauer was the best hitter in the AL, with 56. Jeter comes in with 37.4, which is still very good (that's 6th in the league). Now, that's a difference of 18.6 - a huge amount. It's equal to the difference between Jeter and Russell Branyan or Denard Span.

If we look at VORP, Mauer also led the league in that, with 91. That's really high - but Jeter was 2nd with 68.1. But again, the difference between the two is HUGE - the difference is the same between Jeter and Jason Kubel. Using RARP, which adjusts for position, Mauer was 1st with 74.4, Jeter 2nd with 60.7, aka the difference between Jeter and Shin-soo Choo.

Now, honest question - do you think that Russell Branyan or Denard Span or Jason Kubel or Shin-soo Choo should be compared to Derek Jeter? And if so, why? What are you reasons, other than the previously stated "Gehrig hits" argument.

Taking all of this into consideration, there is no argument to be made for Jeter winning the MVP. None. And, especially when you consider that Mauer is without a doubt an elite defender and Jeter is absolutely not (although this year he was 6th in the AL among SS for fielding runs above average), it's a complete landslide in one direction.

All of that said - I still think Jeter will get a bunch of first place votes and I would not be shocked to see him win. I think those voters who pick him should be kicked out of the BBWAA, but I think he has a good shot for the reasons you suggested - more of a "lifetime" award, the hits record, etc. This is rather than actually looking at value, but we know that sportswriters are usually pretty dumb. The only major knock of Mauer was his missing the first month of the season, but considering how great he was this year (and he still qualified for the batting title, getting the necessary 512 plate appearances), that doesn't change things.
DVDjHardy 12:53 PM - 13 October, 2009
Quote:
I still think Jeter will get a bunch of first place votes and I would not be shocked to see him win. I think those voters who pick him should be kicked out of the BBWAA


+1, except for him winning part...I'd be shocked to see him win. It would be like the 2004 Presidential election all over again if Jeter wins.
DJ CISC0 11:06 PM - 13 October, 2009
Quote:
Now, honest question - do you think that Russell Branyan or Denard Span or Jason Kubel or Shin-soo Choo should be compared to Derek Jeter? And if so, why? What are you reasons, other than the previously stated "Gehrig hits" argument.
You mean "should" or "shouldn't"? So now Jeter is on the same level as these guys? I'm not taking anything away from these guys but I think even they will agree that they are not on the same level as Jeter.

Quote:
more of a "lifetime" award, the hits record, etc. This is rather than actually looking at value, but we know that sportswriters are usually pretty dumb.
Agree. This is what I was trying to get at exactly. Also, by the Yankees advancing to the ALCS, that just helped Jeter get some more votes over Mauer. Just for the record, I never compared Jeter's record to Mauer's (no doubt it's one-sided)...I was just stating how the voting doesn't always turn to the stats when choosing a winner.

-The more I read about how people will flip out if Jeter wins, the more I want to see him win. Just to piss off the haters...LOL!
dj lad 1:10 AM - 14 October, 2009
You are comparing the offensive output of Jeter to Mauer, when I'm saying it's like comparing Branyan to Jeter. Do you think that is a fair comparison? Because if you don't, then you're contradicting yourself. I don't think that Russell Branyan is on the same level as Derek Jeter for the same reasons I don't think Jeter is on Mauer's level - one is drastically better than the other.

FYI, making the ALCS didn't help Jeter get votes, simply because votes are due on the last day of the season. So, nope.
DJ CISC0 2:01 AM - 14 October, 2009
Quote:
You are comparing the offensive output of Jeter to Mauer, when I'm saying it's like comparing Branyan to Jeter. Do you think that is a fair comparison? Because if you don't, then you're contradicting yourself.
1 more time Lad...ITS NOT JUST ABOUT THE STATS! LOL...you don't get it. I think some people just don't get Jeter because you REALLY need to watch him play almost everyday to really put a value on what he does for the team. You simply can't log in data for a lot of the shit he pulls on the field. How does one log the "flip" out play against Oakland in '01, or the HR against Baltimore in 96 ALCS, or the catch he made on the Sox in 04 where he came out of the stands looking like he just got jumped? And those are just "highlights" that everyone already knows about because of espn. You see what I'm trying to say?
DJ CISC0 2:03 AM - 14 October, 2009
Quote:
FYI, making the ALCS didn't help Jeter get votes, simply because votes are due on the last day of the season. So, nope.
I actually never knew the exact due date. I thought it was around the 2 round of the playoffs. Now that I'm thinking about it never even crossed my mind to find out...Thanks.
dj lad 3:50 AM - 14 October, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
You are comparing the offensive output of Jeter to Mauer, when I'm saying it's like comparing Branyan to Jeter. Do you think that is a fair comparison? Because if you don't, then you're contradicting yourself.
1 more time Lad...ITS NOT JUST ABOUT THE STATS! LOL...you don't get it. I think some people just don't get Jeter because you REALLY need to watch him play almost everyday to really put a value on what he does for the team. You simply can't log in data for a lot of the shit he pulls on the field. How does one log the "flip" out play against Oakland in '01, or the HR against Baltimore in 96 ALCS, or the catch he made on the Sox in 04 where he came out of the stands looking like he just got jumped? And those are just "highlights" that everyone already knows about because of espn. You see what I'm trying to say?

And you don't get it. Are you actually valuing one, two, or three plays over a season to define someone an MVP? That's just so narrow-minded - I get that you love the guy and that he's your idol, but Joe Mauer literally just had the best season a catcher has ever had and carried a team to the playoffs in September by himself mostly.

Those highlights you talk about happened 5 years ago at the minimum. Why should they matter now - and that homer against Baltimore was fan interference and you know that damn well. :)

It doesn't have to be just about the stats, but it damn well better mostly be about them. I had no problem with Tejeda winning the MVP in 2002 because he CARRIED that team despite not having the best stats - they had 20 game win streak that year. (Although, in all fairness, A-Rod should have won it). In 2008, Pedroia deserved it because there was no really great dominant season and he was a great player on a playoff team - Youkilis, Morneau, Mauer, Quentin all had equally reasonable arguments to the award. But considering Pedroia played excellent defense at the 4rd most important defensive position, while leading the league in runs, a 20/21 SB success rate, and so on - especially in a year where there wasn't a clear-cut winner - that's acceptable.

If Mauer had his 2008 season this year, I could buy Jeter getting a good shot at MVP. But Mauer led the league in AVG, OBP and SLG. As an elite defender at the toughest position in the game on a team where he had very little help after Morneau went down and they still made the playoffs. When a guy is THAT dominant, there should be NO argument about who the MVP is.
DVDjHardy 4:14 AM - 14 October, 2009
Take out Mauer, do the Twins make the playoffs?

Take out Jeter, do the Yankees make the playoffs?

/debate.
DJ d.range 6:05 AM - 14 October, 2009
^^ werd
dj lad 6:27 AM - 14 October, 2009
Take out Mauer, do the Twins win 70 games?

Take out Jeter, do the Yankees win 95 games?
DJ CISC0 4:35 PM - 14 October, 2009
Quote:
Are you actually valuing one, two, or three plays over a season to define someone an MVP? That's just so narrow-minded - I get that you love the guy and that he's your idol
LMAO!!! Not at all. Read it again...I wasn't trying to say that at all. I was just mentioning some of the well known highlights that will look like a regular defensive stat on paper as opposed to what the real value of the play is...that's all. You mentioned an interesting stat a while back that took these situations and created a stat for it. It still won't define the true "value" of the play but it's close enough. And for the record..some of my Yankee idols are Aaron Boone, Bucky Dent, and Mattingly thank you!
Quote:
that homer against Baltimore was fan interference and you know that damn well. :)
It was fair play back then so I'll take it :)
DJ CISC0 6:06 PM - 14 October, 2009
Quote:
Take out Mauer, do the Twins win 70 games?

Take out Jeter, do the Yankees win 95 games?
So the Yanks only win 8 more games with Jeter? C'mon!
djpuma_gemini 6:33 PM - 14 October, 2009
Go Angels!!
DJ d.range 7:47 PM - 14 October, 2009
Go Dodgers!
CMOS 8:11 PM - 14 October, 2009
Go Knicks!
dj lad 12:37 AM - 15 October, 2009
Well, the stat is called WPA - win probability added. It basically shows how valuable a player has been in the most important moments - so a homer when you're up 15-0 is less valuable than a homer when you're down 4-3.

Mauer was 6th in the AL (impressive since he missed a month of the season) with 3.64. (1st-5th were Ichiro, Bay, Zobrist, Damon, and Franklin Guiterrez). Jeter was at 1.41, or 29th, and behind A-Rod, Teixeira (ranked 7th and 8th), Swisher and Matsui. Those numbers are for hitters only, though.

In terms of pitchers, Greinke was #1 with 6.07 - that's a huge number, almost 2 points higher than 2nd place (Hardy's boy, Verlander). For the record, the least valuable players in the AL were Jeremy Guthrie (-1.68) and Vernon Wells (-2.55).

In the NL, the most valuable hitters were Pujols (8.24) and Fielder (7.79). Joey Votto was third, followed by Howard and Ethier. For pitchers, it's Carpenter, Lincecum, and Wainwright. Least valuable were Russell Martin (-2.40) and Mike Pelfrey (-1.78).

While WPA is a useful stat, it's hardly predictive. The best players are usually near the top every year, but not always. Mauer was #1 last year in the AL - but Pedroia was 6th (3.21). This year Pedroia's WPA was -0.63. Jeter was -0.03. So like I said - its hard, year to year, to know what WPA is going to give you. But its a cool stat and fun to play with.

FTR, all these numbers are for qualified batters or pitchers. You can play around with all of this at fangraphs.com.

As for the wins, 8 wins is pretty much right on. Bill James' win shares stat (a stat that shows how many wins a player is responsible for) has Jeter's 2009 win share at 28 - which is 9.3 (you divide the win shares by 3 to get the # of wins they produced). If a team wins 100 games, there is 300 win shares to distribute. With this, the quality of a good player on a bad team can rate the same as a good player on a good team. FTR, Mauer's Win Shares are at 32 for 2009. So Mauer was worth 1 more win. I think I was overzealous in perhaps stating Mauer's value to the Twins - they're basically a 76 win team without Mauer. Still, that's the difference between making the playoffs and not.
DJ CISC0 8:31 PM - 15 October, 2009
Quote:
Bill James' win shares stat (a stat that shows how many wins a player is responsible for) has Jeter's 2009 win share at 28 - which is 9.3 (you divide the win shares by 3 to get the # of wins they produced). If a team wins 100 games, there is 300 win shares to distribute. With this, the quality of a good player on a bad team can rate the same as a good player on a good team.
Sounds interesting but I need to read this again really slooooow....Maybe it's me right now but I'm not getting how this is calculated.
dj lad 5:50 AM - 16 October, 2009
I'll give you a pretty basic overview of how win shares works, it's pretty cool.

"It considers statistics for players, in the context of their team, and assigns a single number to each player for his contributions for the year. All pitching, hitting and defensive contributions by the player are taken into account. Statistics are adjusted for park, league and era."

The formula itself is ridiculously complicated and I don't really want to get into it. But basically, James (who is arguably the smartest and one of the more interesting and influential baseball minds of the past 30 years) uses this to actually rank the best players at every position, 1-100, in his book "The Bill James Historical Abstract".
DJ CISC0 3:52 AM - 17 October, 2009
^^^I might have to order that book. But, I still think there's too many factors to look at when you credit one person as the main cause of the win. Like I said early in this thread...stats are great and all but it's still not something I would bet on.
OK, so I think that the way we are playing...there's no stopping us. I was really shocked to see the Angels play sloppy defense like that but then again...it was freezing like a mofo tonight. I almost thought that we were playing the Mets for a second. Seriously...Yanks in 5.

Joe G vs. Joe T = WS '09
DJ CISC0 3:56 AM - 17 October, 2009
And for the record...Tim McCarver is such a tool....So many slo mo replays and he still couldn't admit that Arod was NOT tagged at home. Same thing when Tex looked like he came off the bag at first. Tim never wants to admit his mistakes it seems so that makes him a tool.
lvmez 4:27 PM - 17 October, 2009
so i was the game last night and the yankees look good. it also helped that the angels look like fools on the field. overall CC did a great job. i think the yanks will have an easier this time around with the angels.
dj lad 9:45 PM - 17 October, 2009
Yes, McCarver is an idiot. I will never disagree with you there.

As for hte book, it's a great and entertaining read. The thing is that it doesn't credit a player with one single win - a player might get, say, 17% of a win. It adds up.
djpuma_gemini 10:30 PM - 17 October, 2009
angels will take this series
DJ CISC0 2:30 AM - 19 October, 2009
Quote:
so i was the game last night and the yankees look good.
Are you a season ticket holder? You've been to some good games.

Yeah the Yankees looks like they finally have some team chemistry working for them. Now to the west coast so lets see what happens.

Anyone else sick of the B.E.P commercial at the end of an every other inning?
lvmez 3:12 AM - 19 October, 2009
Quote:
Are you a season ticket holder? You've been to some good games.


i'm not, but i either buy tickets or am at the game due to work. either way good times.
i'm trying to go to at least one game per series. if they make it back to nyc for game 6, i'll be there.
dj lad 4:51 AM - 20 October, 2009
Man, did Girardi just blow the fuck out of that one.
lvmez 4:26 PM - 20 October, 2009
yes he did.
DJ CISC0 4:58 PM - 20 October, 2009
You know as soon as McCarver said "bad move" when Girardi brought Ace in to replace Robertson, I said to myself "damn he just f*ing jinxed it"!
But I won't say that He blew it alone. I really don't blame Girardi though for the loss. Ballsy move? You bet....but I guess when you over-manage like that it's going to bite you sooner or later.
We left men on first and second with no outs early in the game and Cano, Melky, and Swisher couldn't bring them in. Gardners failed attempt to steal second cost us as well because the next batter (Posada) homered. But damn everyone in NY is calling for Girardi's head for having a 5-1 record this post season. LOL!
dj lad 8:24 PM - 20 October, 2009
He replaced a lefty reliever with a lefty reliever and a righty reliever with a righty reliever. Very strange. Never seen that.
DJ CISC0 9:54 PM - 20 October, 2009
I think he was going more with the next batters stats against the pitcher- then lefty vs righty.....who knows?
DJ CISC0 9:59 PM - 20 October, 2009
All I know is that the Angels better watch out for Mo's spit pitch !
Watchwww.youtube.com
lvmez 2:00 PM - 21 October, 2009
WOW! the umps are horrible in this series. mlb should come on these guys. as for the yankees, they look great. CC is the man. the only question is who is gettin the mvp, CC or arod?
DJ CISC0 3:10 PM - 21 October, 2009
These Yanks are looking like animals right now. The bottom of the order woke up last night too so that spells big trouble for the Angels. CC on 3 days rest looked simply amazing...He averaged around 9 pitches per inning! AND he pitched 8 innings...That's crazy. I have no clue why he was there in the 7th and 8th though. So the "stat" before this series was the Angels were the best team in baseball with RISP? LOL...the are batting something like .197 with RISP right now. That's why I say fuck a stat!

As far as these umps go..They been horrible in the whole playoffs so far. I mean when you blow an obvious call like Cano and Posada at third....something is very wrong and should be addressed. And they got payback with the Swisher appeal for the bad call at second...forget what they say. Good thing that none of last nights botched calls had an impact on the score.

Kate Hudson for MVP!
uno seis 3:49 PM - 21 October, 2009
Quote:
So the "stat" before this series was the Angels were the best team in baseball with RISP? LOL...the are batting something like .197 with RISP right now. That's why I say fuck a stat!


i don't know what stat you're talking about but i encourage you to look up "sample size"

yanks are playing pretty damn well, i def agree with you on that!
DJ CISC0 7:48 PM - 21 October, 2009
Uno- they showed the stat last night on the mlb network after the game. I tried looking it up but I can't find it...maybe Lad could confirm. Funniest thing I saw last night was when they interviewed Manny Ramirez. Dude was in the shower during the ninth inning last night. LOL...Does this guy even have a brain.
lvmez 8:25 PM - 21 October, 2009
he must have a brain, he's making 20million a year.
DJ d.range 9:35 PM - 21 October, 2009
the umps have been horrible for years now... regular & post season.

and the whole thing of not showing replays where the umps make mistakes is bullshit
dj lad 10:15 PM - 21 October, 2009
Yeah, sample size. It's 4 games. It means nothing - A-Rod is hitting on a pace where he'd basically end up with 120 homers over the season. That's not sustainable.
lvmez 11:52 PM - 21 October, 2009
did anyone see the interview after the game with the ump who screwed up? he said he saw the replays. he was trying to stick his head in his ass from being embarrassed
DJ CISC0 2:28 AM - 22 October, 2009
Quote:
he must have a brain, he's making 20million a year.
I'll give credit to Scott Boras for that one:)

Quote:
did anyone see the interview after the game with the ump who screwed up? he said he saw the replays. he was trying to stick his head in his ass from being embarrassed
I say they start testing these umps for hallucinogens.
DJ CISC0 5:04 PM - 22 October, 2009
It's funny how when Philly won there was basic security on the field. When the Yanks win they have half of the NYPD on the field.

Did you guys check out that hot mess Steve Phillips is banging?
www.nypost.com
The Notourious B.K.S. 5:09 PM - 22 October, 2009
hot is the furthest thing I think of when refering to that chick. She got to sneak up on a glass of water to get a drink.
uno seis 5:18 PM - 22 October, 2009
Quote:
hot is the furthest thing I think of when refering to that chick.
DJ CISC0 6:34 PM - 22 October, 2009
Quote:
She got to sneak up on a glass of water to get a drink.
LOL! He should be banned from baseball.
lvmez 7:40 PM - 22 October, 2009
Quote:
It's funny how when Philly won there was basic security on the field. When the Yanks win they have half of the NYPD on the field.

Did you guys check out that hot mess Steve Phillips is banging?
www.nypost.com


steve phillips is a douche. how do you get busted with that? i guess having money isn't enough now a days.

the yanks the nypd there, that crowd will jump on the field.
DVDjHardy 8:20 PM - 22 October, 2009
Quote:
hot is the furthest thing I think of when refering to that chick. She got to sneak up on a glass of water to get a drink.


LMAO!

Really though Steve? C'mon Son! LOL
lvmez 12:20 AM - 23 October, 2009
damm, AJ getting lit up!!!
DPR250R 1:01 PM - 23 October, 2009
If the Yanks loose 2 more... and the WS is Philly vs. Anaheim......

Who are you routing for?

I think I will be routing for the Angels.....
DJ CISC0 2:32 PM - 23 October, 2009
Quote:
If the Yanks loose 2 more... and the WS is Philly vs. Anaheim......
Stop it with the crazy talk.

The game last night was a nice battle. I think Joe G made a mistake by leaving Burnett in the game to get two men on though. I'm not blaming him or anything but it looks like he's double guessing himself now cause of that bone headed move the other day.
DJ CISC0 10:33 PM - 24 October, 2009
I doubt the game will be played tonight. It's been raining all day and I think I just heard thunder.
lvmez 2:33 AM - 25 October, 2009
CC tomorrow, looking to close out asap.
dj lad 10:17 AM - 25 October, 2009
Thats not what I heard.
lvmez 3:59 PM - 25 October, 2009
petite going tonight.
dj lad 12:09 AM - 26 October, 2009
It made no sense to start CC tonight - if you lose you still have him for Game 7. If you win, he can start G1 of the WS.
DJ CISC0 12:09 AM - 26 October, 2009
I would've put CC in tonight...fuck all that!
DJ CISC0 12:09 AM - 26 October, 2009
^^^oh shit...same time
lvmez 4:37 AM - 26 October, 2009
Quote:
yankees in 6 against angels..
DJ CISC0 12:26 PM - 26 October, 2009
Time to get my new fitted with the WS patch. Yankees bring home #27 in 5. It's crazy to think that there are Met fans that are rooting for Philly...WTF?
DJ d.range 12:28 PM - 26 October, 2009
^^^
never that
dj lad 5:33 PM - 26 October, 2009
Let the battle for New Jersey begin!

I think you're really underrating the Phils. They won't be intimidated by the Yankees and they can hit from 1 through 9 and can even run Matt Stairs out as a DH. They have top pitching in Cliff Lee, and do you trust Burnett to be better than Hamels? I'm not sure that's a given.

I will say this much: home runs will be hit in this series.
lvmez 5:46 PM - 26 October, 2009
the yankees have the edge with defense and bullpen. there defense has been great. also, forget about a.j. for a minute because petit has been great. we have options. the rotation is setup perfectly.
DJ CISC0 6:28 PM - 26 October, 2009
Quote:
the yankees have the edge with defense and bullpen. there defense has been great.
Also, we can match bat for bat and come up on top. Our bats are much hotter right now.
uno seis 6:33 PM - 26 October, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
the yankees have the edge with defense and bullpen. there defense has been great.
Also, we can match bat for bat and come up on top. Our bats are much hotter right now.

the phillies averaged 7 runs a game vs the dodgers, how are they so much less hot than the yankees?
DVDjHardy 6:35 PM - 26 October, 2009
Phillies in 6.
lvmez 6:48 PM - 26 October, 2009
please don't compare the dodgers to any team that the yankees have played in these playoffs. the yankees have faced much tougher pitching. the dodgers were overated.
DJ d.range 7:17 PM - 26 October, 2009
so, if the phillies win again, will everyone stop shittin on the NL??
DVDjHardy 7:23 PM - 26 October, 2009
Quote:
so, if the phillies win again, will everyone stop shittin on the NL??


Nope! LOL
lvmez 7:44 PM - 26 October, 2009
Quote:
so, if the phillies win again, will everyone stop shittin on the NL??


be easy. phillies are NOT beating the yankees. half the yankee line-up had a terrible post season and they still won. yankees wear down good pitching. they take alot of pitches. the back of the line just started to wake up.
uno seis 7:51 PM - 26 October, 2009
Quote:
please don't compare the dodgers to any team that the yankees have played in these playoffs. the yankees have faced much tougher pitching. the dodgers were overated.


the dodgers pitching staff led ALL OF MLB in ERA, adjusted ERA and WHIP. the angels had a more conventional pitching staff with people whose names we recognize, but they were a worse pitching staff.

also note: i am not a dodger fan, just am speakin some truth here
lvmez 8:01 PM - 26 October, 2009
did you see how the dodgers ended the season? they crawled into the playoffs. cliff is the only guy on that staff that will giveyanks some trouble. cole hamels is being moved to the 3 spot behind PEDRO MARTINEZ! We are going to destroy pedro.
uno seis 8:16 PM - 26 October, 2009
you're right, the dodgers ended the season poorly. all i'm saying is you can't dismiss/ignore their entire 2009 regular season pitching performance.
DJ CISC0 11:00 PM - 26 October, 2009
Quote:
you're right, the dodgers ended the season poorly. all i'm saying is you can't dismiss/ignore their entire 2009 regular season pitching performance.
You can easily dismiss regular season pitching. Just take a look a few posts up when I mentioned the Angels having the best record with RISP then hitting shit against the Yanks. I'm just saying that you shouldn't bank on that alone.....anything can happen in the post season so you can throw those regular season stats out the window IMO.
uno seis 11:05 PM - 26 October, 2009
again, sample size sample size sample size...what i am getting at is: if you're going to make these bold proclamations you have to back it up with something. the large sample size of the regular season is best to use as evidence. you're almost proving my point by saying that anything can happen in the post season...i agree with you because it is such a small SAMPLE SIZE.
DJ d.range 11:10 PM - 26 October, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
so, if the phillies win again, will everyone stop shittin on the NL??


be easy. phillies are NOT beating the yankees. half the yankee line-up had a terrible post season and they still won. yankees wear down good pitching. they take alot of pitches. the back of the line just started to wake up.


jeez, i said if
lvmez 12:13 AM - 27 October, 2009
lol. just getting excited man. no disrespect.
DJ CISC0 12:19 AM - 27 October, 2009
Quote:
again, sample size sample size sample size...what i am getting at is: if you're going to make these bold proclamations you have to back it up with something. the large sample size of the regular season is best to use as evidence. you're almost proving my point by saying that anything can happen in the post season...i agree with you because it is such a small SAMPLE SIZE.
It's not rocket science that there's some players that play just like they do in the regular season and there's some that clearly don't. Just take a look at A-Rods numbers in the post season from '04 - '07! You think I was calling it "sample size, sample size"? GTFOH....everyone including myself was calling it a choke.
uno seis 2:12 AM - 27 October, 2009
and everyone who called it a choke was WRONG...it was sample size! look at his postseason stats before that. and look at his postseason stats now. look at his career postseason stats and you'll see how closely they mirror his career regular season stats. do some research!
uno seis 2:17 AM - 27 October, 2009
forget it i'll do the research

batting avg/ on base %/slug %
arod reg season: 309/390/576
arod postseason: 308/408/570

arod: not a choker. yes he had some struggles there in the playoffs, no denying that. but as you can see, the more his SAMPLE SIZE increased, the more it started to mirror his career averages
dj lad 6:02 AM - 27 October, 2009
I won't stop shitting on the NL, but the Phillies are good enough to compete in the AL. Not counting pitchers hitting they had a team OPS of 809 this year - the Yankees were at 839. Give Ben Francisco + Matt Stairs 600 ABs and the team OPS probably goes up to 820 or so. They can hit. And they're a very strong lefty hitting team (Utley, Howard, Victorino, Rollins, Ibanez can all hit lefty) and in that Yankee Stadium they're going to be aiming at that short-ass right field fence.

Their starting pitching is good - Lee is a legit ace. Hamels has shown to be an ace in the past and could easily just show up and dominate (similar to Burnett) and Pedro is -- well, he's Pedro. I wouldn't count him out yet there, lvmez. Their bullpen is their weak spot, but they've pitched well so far this postseason.

Most of all, they won't be intimidated by the Yankees or Yankee Stadium. They have a SERIOUS swagger and want to be the first back-to-back champs in nearly a decade. In a lot of ways they remind me of the 2003 Red Sox - great lineup, an ace with two strong SPs behind him, and a bullpen that is coming around at the right time. That's scary to any team.
dj lad 1:51 PM - 27 October, 2009
FWIW the Yankees are trying to become the first time in the WC era to win a championship with a 3-man postseason rotation.
lvmez 2:20 PM - 27 October, 2009
who is matt stairs?
DJ d.range 2:58 PM - 27 October, 2009
he rides the bench for the philles, supposedly he's a pinch hitting god
lvmez 3:14 PM - 27 October, 2009
lol. i know who he is, BUT why is his name even being bought up. if they are counting on matt stairs they are in trouble.
DJ CISC0 4:24 PM - 27 October, 2009
Quote:
and everyone who called it a choke was WRONG...it was sample size! look at his postseason stats before that. and look at his postseason stats now. look at his career postseason stats and you'll see how closely they mirror his career regular season stats. do some research!
Uno- I'm talking about his 04-07 postseason stats NOT his career post season stats. I never said anything about his previous stats. Maybe the word "choke" was too harsh to use but it comes close. I don't have too much time today to look up stats but I'm sure the 04-07 post season stats do not compare well with his regular season stats for those years.
uno seis 4:49 PM - 27 October, 2009
thats true, he was bad during those years
lvmez 7:03 PM - 27 October, 2009
just found i'm going to the game tomorrow. jay-z will be performing empire state. should be fun.
DJ CISC0 7:15 PM - 27 October, 2009
^^ Damn dude Im hating :) !

Have fun!
lvmez 7:32 PM - 27 October, 2009
lol. i'll take some pics.
uno seis 7:50 PM - 27 October, 2009
Quote:
just found i'm going to the game tomorrow. jay-z will be performing empire state. should be fun.


nice!
dj lad 10:50 PM - 27 October, 2009
Quote:
lol. i know who he is, BUT why is his name even being bought up. if they are counting on matt stairs they are in trouble.

Matt Stairs is a career 264/358/481 hitter. He can hit and that's what he's best at. Not much of a defender.

Simply put - he is an AL type of player - he will DH and be a good DH, as opposed to some previous WS where the NL team had to use a shitty hitter as a DH. And Ben Francisco can play left, pushing Ibanez to DH. The Philly bench is DEEP.
DJ CISC0 1:30 AM - 28 October, 2009
It's too hard to keep up with someone like Matt Stairs...dude's been on like 10+ teams in 17 years. He's worse than Roberto Alomar when it comes to staying put with one team...LOL. Something other than his defense must not be right with him. I didn't even know he was still playing...honestly.

Lad's right...He'll make a nice DH for Philly though.
Marx&Villain 1:58 AM - 28 October, 2009
lets do it yanks
lvmez 2:31 AM - 28 October, 2009
why are we still talking about matt stairs? the guy will be keeping the benches warm for the other players. it's cold in nyc.
dj lad 3:06 AM - 28 October, 2009
Stairs is the kind of player who didn't get a chance at regular playing time well until he reached his 30s - he's got what is called "old player skills" - aka, a good batting eye and power. Once he got to Oakland in 1997, he got it and became a regular from 1997-2006.
lvmez 3:22 AM - 28 October, 2009
this is too funny. i think you have a man crush on matt stairs. for your sake i hope he hits a home run and then winks into the camera just for you. you know i'm just messing around.
DJ CISC0 5:11 PM - 28 October, 2009
Ivmez, we still trading my limited CVs for your ticket to tonights game :)
DVDjHardy 2:49 AM - 29 October, 2009
Bizzump!

I'm loving this game! Go Phillies!
DVDjHardy 2:58 AM - 29 October, 2009
The Yankees should now refer to Cliff Lee as their daddy.
dj lad 8:56 AM - 29 October, 2009
Stairs a good player is all I'm saying. The Phillies have a guy in him that they can use in the AL parks.

Of course, they can also use Francisco at LF and Ibanez at DH. With Burnett going tomorrow, Stairs should be DHing.
lvmez 3:00 PM - 29 October, 2009
so i had a great time at the game last night., stadium was packed. cliff was ON! CC wasn't bad and pitched good enough to win but they couldn't hit. Jerry Manuel wasn't going to the bullpen no matter what. if the yankees saw anyother pitchers they would have came back.

[IMG]i155.photobucket.com[/IMG]

IMG]i155.photobucket.com[/IMG]

IMG]i155.photobucket.com[/IMG]
DJ CISC0 3:30 PM - 29 October, 2009
Yep both pitchers did well but Cliff was locked...no doubt about it. I can't say much about the game because I f*ing missed most of it. So did Jay-Z cancel last night?
Quote:
Bizzump!

I'm loving this game! Go Phillies!

What's up Hardy...I thought we were like brothers? Is that the way you treat the team that swept your daddies when they took your playoff spot :)

Yankee haters and Philly fans click here
www.rosenbergradio.com
DJ CISC0 3:31 PM - 29 October, 2009
Quote:

[IMG]i155.photobucket.com[/IMG]

IMG]i155.photobucket.com[/IMG]

IMG]i155.photobucket.com[/IMG]

Cool pics...I'm still hating :)
DVDjHardy 3:40 PM - 29 October, 2009
We can still be friends if I hate your team, lol. Go Phillies!
lvmez 7:51 PM - 29 October, 2009
Quote:
Quote:

[IMG]i155.photobucket.com[/IMG]

IMG]i155.photobucket.com[/IMG]

IMG]i155.photobucket.com[/IMG]

Cool pics...I'm still hating :)


thanks.
DJ d.range 10:54 PM - 29 October, 2009
Quote:
Jerry Manuel


???????

=p
dj lad 11:18 PM - 29 October, 2009
Charlie Manuel is a dope. BTW. He's the worst.
DJ d.range 12:01 AM - 30 October, 2009
theres a guy on WFAN in NY who does a hilarious, spot on impression of him...
lvmez 1:32 AM - 30 October, 2009
i meant charlie. lol.
DJ CISC0 3:28 AM - 30 October, 2009
Fck a Matt Stairs...lol
DJ CISC0 3:33 AM - 30 October, 2009
Pedro did good BTW....Did Kate Hudson leave A-Rod or something? WTF is up with him?..............Oh that's right....sample size....never mind.
lvmez 4:04 AM - 30 October, 2009
lol. we needed that.
dj lad 8:23 AM - 30 October, 2009
It is sample size, are you kidding? 2 games against an all-time great pitching performance and then a very solid one the next night?
DPR250R 12:04 PM - 30 October, 2009
Quote:
Pedro did good BTW....Did Kate Hudson leave A-Rod or something? WTF is up with him?..............Oh that's right....sample size....never mind.


She finally gave it up to him.... he fucked now.
uno seis 3:27 PM - 30 October, 2009
haha maybe thats it...like when George Costanza became a super genius when he wasn't gettin any from his chick
lvmez 4:08 AM - 1 November, 2009
yanks going yard tonight.
DJ CISC0 11:17 PM - 1 November, 2009
Quote:
It is sample size, are you kidding? 2 games against an all-time great pitching performance and then a very solid one the next night?
So I guess Ryan Howard shouldn't have anything to worry about then huh?

Quote:
yanks going yard tonight.
Hit of the night went to pettitte for that RBI single...LOL.

I would've won 100 bucks if Hughes didn't give up that HR....I was sooo pissed but still happy about the win. But still..you give up a fckin HR with only 2 outs left to go...C'MON!
lvmez 4:48 AM - 2 November, 2009
get the bottles on ice, get the parade route ready, get the rings sized, get the banner ready at the new stadium!!!!!!!!!!!!

it's looking good.

tough game tonight but we pulled it out!!
DPR250R 4:49 PM - 2 November, 2009
It's really been great to watch as a fan.

No real blowouts... always back and forth... pretty exciting IMO....
lvmez 4:13 AM - 3 November, 2009
AJ really bombed tonight. it's going to be hard to come back. cliff lee looked hittable tonight. we missed the chance to win tonght.
DJ CISC0 4:31 AM - 3 November, 2009
It'll be that much sweeter winning it in the BX. I couldn't even watch most of this game because I was working late again. Oh well...It was a matter of time before AJ slipped.
DJ CISC0 5:03 AM - 3 November, 2009
LOL! The streets of Philly look like they won the world series or something.
DVDjHardy 12:29 PM - 3 November, 2009
2004
lvmez 2:24 PM - 3 November, 2009
Quote:
2004



you wish. the yankees are a better team. as bad as they played last night they almost came back.
DJ CISC0 3:20 PM - 3 November, 2009
Quote:
2004
LOL! Hater! We understand :)
dj lad 9:29 AM - 4 November, 2009
It'll be very interesting if this goes to 7 to see who the Phils pitch. I wouldn't be shocked to see them try to throw Lee on 2 days rest with Happ, Hamels, and crew all waiting in the wings.

And I'll say this much - I would never, ever, ever bet against a motivated Pedro Martinez.
DJ d.range 1:24 PM - 4 November, 2009
Quote:
And I'll say this much - I would never, ever, ever bet against a motivated Pedro Martinez.


believe that!
DPR250R 1:56 PM - 4 November, 2009
Quote:
And I'll say this much - I would never, ever, ever bet against a motivated Pedro Martinez.



It's a real nice setup tonight... Petite vs. Martinez... possible chance to win the Wolrd Series...

Martinez on the mound makes it that much more interesting. If the Yankess beat him... it will feel 10x better then if they beat someone else on the Phillies staff... if the Yankees loose to him it will feel 10000x worse!!!

Really sets up a great game!!!
DVDjHardy 2:33 PM - 4 November, 2009
^+1

Go Pedro!
uno seis 5:18 PM - 4 November, 2009
i'm also rooting for Pedro tonight!
DPR250R 6:32 PM - 4 November, 2009
DJ CISC0 6:34 PM - 4 November, 2009
Quote:
It'll be very interesting if this goes to 7 to see who the Phils pitch. I wouldn't be shocked to see them try to throw Lee on 2 days rest with Happ, Hamels, and crew all waiting in the wings.

And I'll say this much - I would never, ever, ever bet against a motivated Pedro Martinez.
Sorry to say but the baseball season is ending tonight my friends. Pettitte will shut it down and pitch around Utley and Werth tonight.

I'll bet against a motivated Pedro Martinez, facing his daddies at Yankee stadium, with only one game left to win it all...I'll take that bet thanks.
DJ CISC0 6:36 PM - 4 November, 2009
I love todays cover of the Post.

www.nypost.com
djrayray0981 6:38 PM - 4 November, 2009
Quote:
^+1

Go Pedro!


Hate the Yanks. Sorry Cisco. Hope they f*&#ing Choke tonight.
DJ CISC0 7:09 PM - 4 November, 2009
Quote:
Hate the Yanks. Sorry Cisco. Hope they f*&#ing Choke tonight.
It's all good. With Pettitte and CC as our last 2 pitchers is a good look for us. Throw in the fact that Howard already has 12 K's, Victorino is basically playing with one hand, Posada will catch both games (Molina out)...the Yankees are is a very nice position to bring home number 27.
dj lad 8:51 PM - 4 November, 2009
They're still two pitchers going on 3 days rest (CC on his 3rd start in 9 days) which is always a recipe for disaster.

I can't believe you are still going on that "Who's Your Daddy?" crap. It's so 2004. And I remember what happened in 2004. Very well.
dj lad 8:53 PM - 4 November, 2009
That said I expect the Yankees to win. Vegas has the line tonight at -200, which is a pretty big line.
DJ CISC0 10:22 PM - 4 November, 2009
Pedro's the kind of guy we love to hate :) Even though he threw 70 year old Don Zimmer head first to the ground.... But seriously, this game might just be the last Pedro VS Yankees battle so it makes it that much exciting.
lvmez 4:50 AM - 5 November, 2009
#27!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

the yankees win!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

let the hate begin.
DJ CISC0 4:53 AM - 5 November, 2009
Back on top!!!!!!

Hi haters !!!!!!!
djrayray0981 4:54 AM - 5 November, 2009
Fuuuuckkkkkk!!!!!! Enjoy Yankee fans. But I'm hating.
DJ CISC0 4:56 AM - 5 November, 2009
Mo rings, Mo rings, Mo rings!
DVDjHardy 4:59 AM - 5 November, 2009
Congrats! But I still hate the Yankees.
lvmez 5:00 AM - 5 November, 2009
hate on!!!

we are back!!!
DJ CISC0 5:00 AM - 5 November, 2009
Damn now I won't be able to sleep......my block is wild right now...cars, horns, screams...
DJ Sniffles 5:06 AM - 5 November, 2009
YEAH YEAH YEAH WHAT!!!! It's crazy out here!!!!
DJ McKay 5:17 AM - 5 November, 2009
THE YANKeeeeeeeees WIN !!!!!!!!! NOW shut it PHILLIES FANS !!!!! LOL
DJ McKay 5:17 AM - 5 November, 2009
THE YANKeeeeeeeees WIN !!!!!!!!! NOW shut it PHILLIES FANS !!!!! LOL
DJ CISC0 5:32 AM - 5 November, 2009
Quote:
THE YANKeeeeeeeees WIN !!!!!!!!! NOW shut it BOSTON FANS !!!!! LOL

Fixed!
DJ CISC0 5:33 AM - 5 November, 2009
Quote:
THE YANKeeeeeeeees WIN !!!!!!!!! NOW shut it MET FANS !!!!! LOL
Re-fixed!
djrayray0981 6:49 AM - 5 November, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
THE YANKeeeeeeeees WIN !!!!!!!!! NOW shut it YANKE FANS !!!!! LOL
Re-fixed!


Final Fix. Now move on.
lvmez 3:07 PM - 5 November, 2009
HIDEKI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! MVP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

jeter has 5 rings!!!!
DVDjHardy 3:47 PM - 5 November, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
THE YANKeeeeeeeees WIN !!!!!!!!! NOW shut it YANKEE FANS !!!!! LOL
Re-fixed!


Final Fix. Now move on.
DJ CISC0 8:13 PM - 5 November, 2009
OK all of a sudden now there's so many people wearing Yankee gear around here. Bunch of bandwagon riders!
lvmez 9:01 PM - 5 November, 2009
don't let that bother you. look at it this way. all those fake yankee fans are all buying hats and shirts are just increasing the money yankees make. this way we can buy more players next year. i hear shane victorino is a free agent next year!
djrayray0981 9:10 PM - 5 November, 2009
Quote:
don't let that bother you. look at it this way. all those fake yankee fans are all buying hats and shirts are just increasing the money yankees make. this way we can buy more players next year. i hear shane victorino is a free agent next year!


Spoken like a true Yankee Fan. Buy those World Series trophies.
dj lad 9:44 PM - 5 November, 2009
Congrats.

Ugh.
DJ d.range 10:16 PM - 5 November, 2009
Quote:
don't let that bother you. look at it this way. all those fake yankee fans are all buying hats and shirts are just increasing the money yankees make. this way we can buy more players next year. i hear shane victorino is a free agent next year!


I call BS!!

Jay-Z made the yankee hat more famous than a yankee can =p
DJ CISC0 10:57 PM - 5 November, 2009
Quote:
Congrats.

Ugh.
LOL! How difficult was that?
DJ CISC0 11:00 PM - 5 November, 2009
Quote:
Jay-Z made the yankee hat more famous than a yankee can =p
LOL...when Jay performed at the stadium the other day he kind of mumbled that line like "damn what made me write this line"..LOL I bet he never thought that he would actually have to do that song IN Yankee stadium.
lvmez 3:35 AM - 6 November, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
don't let that bother you. look at it this way. all those fake yankee fans are all buying hats and shirts are just increasing the money yankees make. this way we can buy more players next year. i hear shane victorino is a free agent next year!


Spoken like a true Yankee Fan. Buy those World Series trophies.



that's right. the yankees are making other organiztions rich(profit sharing) and the owners are pocketing that money instead of reinvesting it into the team. there lost. we'll keep winning championships!!
dj lad 9:50 AM - 6 November, 2009
Boy that's just so incredibly wrong.

The salary structure in MLB is broken. MLB is the only sport of the four majors that doesn't have a hard cap. As a result, one team has spent - get this - 1.85 BILLION dollars from 2001-2009. 1.85 BILLION.

That is nearly 660 MILLION more than the second team.

If you don't see that as a major problem, I don't know what to tell you. I think it's absolutely telling of how horrible a GM Brian Cashman is that he spent 1.85 BILLION dollars and got one title from it.

The luxury tax is a laugher - while Yankee fans will point to the Red Sox have also been offenders, from 2003-2007, 89% of all luxury tax monies came from the Yankees. So it's not exactly "close". And the thing is that - the Yankees don't really care - they'll put $5M in the pockets of a few owners (who can choose to invest it in - what - an average ballplayer), while the Yankees spend $19M on a shortstop with little range. The luxury tax does absolutely nothing and ultimately, it has very little affect on the game. It allows a team that spent $35M to spend $40M, which 95% of the time, won't really change anything in terms of standings.

But don't get me wrong - I don't blame the Yankees for it. They're taking advantage of a broken system, rightfully so. They should continue to do it until baseball fixes their system. So while it's unfortunate for the rest of baseball's FANS, it's not for baseball itself. The players union will never agree to a hard cap unless there is also a salary floor as well - say, $70M. So while the Yankees might be capped at $130M (which last year would also have affected the Mets, Tigers, and Red Sox, each around $138M), it would also take the bottom 11 teams and make them spend more. That would be a good thing.

Oh, and merchandise money gets equally split between all 30 teams. So every Yankee hat that is bought also helps the Red Sox just as much. This, by the way, is why teams like the Red Sox and Yankees LOVE having their own TV Network - that money doesn't go to anyone but the team itself. There are other sources of income - like the Red Sox ownership group having a stake in Roush Racing - they can take money earned from that and spend it on the team. It's actually pretty genius. It's all about "alternative revenue streams" that don't get touched by MLB.

If I remember right, actually, stuff sold overseas (in Japan, for example) doesn't get touched either - which I'm sure is part of the reason the Sox felt comfortable paying $51.1 million to negotiate with Daisuke. I'm sure they felt they would make that money back in short order (say, 3 years), plus allowing them to become a merchandising monster there, which by all accounts they have.
DJ d.range 3:22 PM - 6 November, 2009
how do u know all of this?
CMOS 4:14 PM - 6 November, 2009
There were people passing around bottles of patron on the trains this morning on the way to work. FUckin job i wanna go PARTY!.
DJ CISC0 5:38 PM - 6 November, 2009
Why the hell is Jay-Z on the float with A-Rod?
DJ CISC0 6:11 PM - 6 November, 2009
Quote:
I think it's absolutely telling of how horrible a GM Brian Cashman is that he spent 1.85 BILLION dollars and got one title from it.
Yep, so horrible that he got a contract extension at the end of '05.
The problem during these years was that everyone had too much faith and confidence in Joe Torre. People were too blind to see that he was slipping a bit when it came to taking chances like he used to do in his hungry days. It just always looked like he just laid back more and let the team "do it's thing" ever since the 2000 season.

Quote:
But don't get me wrong - I don't blame the Yankees for it. They're taking advantage of a broken system, rightfully so. They should continue to do it until baseball fixes their system.
I agree. And you know very well that any other team would've done the same EXACT thing so I laugh everytime I hear this arguement. People seem to forget that the Yankees didn't just pull all this money out of thin air. The Yankees also had to build from the ground up to get to where there are at.
dj lad 7:33 PM - 6 November, 2009
Quote:
how do u know all of this?

I spent a lot of time reading about the business of baseball. I'm probably wrong about a number or two in there, but I'm correct about most of it.
dj lad 7:34 PM - 6 November, 2009
Quote:
I think it's absolutely telling of how horrible a GM Brian Cashman is that he spent 1.85 BILLION dollars and got one title from it.
Yep, so horrible that he got a contract extension at the end of '05.
Bad management gets new contracts all the time.
DVDjHardy 7:50 PM - 6 November, 2009
Quote:

Bad management gets new contracts all the time.


Dave Dombrowski
lvmez 2:27 AM - 7 November, 2009
Quote:
Why the hell is Jay-Z on the float with A-Rod?



i was at the parade as well. jay-z needs to stay in his lane. he is an attention whore. got a few autographs too.

[IMG]i155.photobucket.com[/IMG]
DJ CISC0 3:13 AM - 8 November, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
Why the hell is Jay-Z on the float with A-Rod?



i was at the parade as well. jay-z needs to stay in his lane. he is an attention whore. got a few autographs too.

[IMG]i155.photobucket.com[/IMG]
Cool! It reminds me when I went to the 99 world series when they won. It was funny because the only Yankee left in the parking lot that night was Ricky Ledee. His ride wasn't even there so he was just standing there looking tight. I walked right past security (drunk LOL) and asked him to sign my ball. He looked at me confused and said "you're not supposed to be here". I'm like "it's cool just sign the ball". He signed it...it was so funny though.
lvmez 3:24 AM - 8 November, 2009
CC was actually a very cool guy. cano didn't say a word just signed it. i was next to matsui ,tex and jeter but couldn't get there autograph. i'm already excited about next year. i was just talking to my boys about getting a half season package.
DJ CISC0 2:53 AM - 9 November, 2009
Man! I wish I still had all of my signed baseballs and stuff. My apartment was burglarized 5 years ago and they took all of my autographed shit.....jeter, O'Neil, Ichiro, Bobby Thompson, Piazza....and MUCH more people.....Damn, I just got depressed thinking about that :)
dj lad 5:37 AM - 9 November, 2009
Why the smiley after?
DJ CISC0 12:17 PM - 9 November, 2009
My bad..


:(
DJ TK 12:27 PM - 9 November, 2009
If I was all you yankee's fan I would boycott going to the stadium until they bring ticket prices back to some where in the range of normal priced. It's insane how much more expensive yankee tickets are than any other MLB team.
dj lad 6:59 PM - 9 November, 2009
BTW, this is something I just learned:

"The Luxury Tax is also called the 'Competitive Balance Tax'. Ironically, the money from the tax isn't distributed to smaller market teams to promote competitive balance. Instead, it goes into an 'Industry Growth Fund' that MLB uses for player benefits and to promote the growth of baseball around the world. Money is distributed to smaller revenue teams, but that money comes from MLB's revenue sharing program, which is entirely separate and independent of the luxury tax."

So basically the luxury tax doesn't give a red cent to the Marlins or other low-payroll teams.
DJ CISC0 10:34 PM - 10 November, 2009
So Tex and Jeter each take home a Gold Glove...I'm surprised Jeter got one though...you know...being such a poor defender and all :)

newyork.yankees.mlb.com
dj lad 10:45 PM - 10 November, 2009
This is what I said on March 11:

"Gold Gloves mean shit. Rafael Palmiero won a GG while playing 28 games in the field. It is a stupid award that has no merit. Jeter is, without a doubt, one of the worst defensive shortstops in baseball."

He still is. It's easier to win a second GG than a first. That said, Jeter's defense did improve this year, but it went from being horrible to mediocre. He was probably the 5th best defensive shortstop in the AL - Izturis (Cesar) should have won it. Andrus, Everett, Aybar were all better. Anyway, it's a stupid and meaningless award that you win because of reputation - that's why guys win it 14 times in a row. Voters (who are players are managers) are lazy. Guys who hit well win the awards quite often. Please, please, please do not take the gold glove as an indicator of good defense.
DJ CISC0 4:22 PM - 12 November, 2009
I know we went through this in March lad...I just thought you would be thrilled to know that Jeter got one this year )
dj lad 6:31 PM - 23 November, 2009
Today's the day for the AL MVP.
dj lad 7:01 PM - 23 November, 2009
Mauer wins it, in DOMINATING fashion. 27 of 28 first place votes. The other 1st place votes goes to Miguel Cabrera.

What'd I tell you?
DJ CISC0 10:03 PM - 23 November, 2009
What's the big deal with Cabrera getting one first place vote anyway? He came in 4th behind Tex and Jeter.

Ahh...Mauer can have the MVP...we have something better than that this year :)
dj lad 12:57 AM - 24 November, 2009
That was weird. Mauer was just so obviously the MVP. The strange part is that it was a reporter from Seattle who chose Cabrera.
lvmez 2:13 AM - 24 November, 2009
let him have it.he deserves it. jeter and tex got gold gloves and a RING!!! you yankee haters always trying to find an angle to hate on us. NOT THIS YEAR!!! SUCKERS!!
uno seis 3:36 AM - 24 November, 2009
haha it has nothing to do with being a yankee hater...mauer deserved the mvp, just like the yankees deserved their ring
dj lad 9:17 AM - 24 November, 2009
Ding ding.

Hell, put Teixeira, Sabathia, and Burnett on any team before the season and they'd be the favorites.... some teams just spend $1.6B to win a championship.
dj lad 9:17 AM - 24 November, 2009
Oh, and PLEASE do not gloat about Gold Gloves. Seriously.
lvmez 2:08 PM - 24 November, 2009
^^^HATER ALERT!!!!
DVDjHardy 2:23 PM - 24 November, 2009
Quote:
^^^SANITY ALERT!!!!


I know, right?
DJ CISC0 3:12 PM - 24 November, 2009
Quote:

Hell, put Teixeira, Sabathia, and Burnett on any team before the season and they'd be the favorites.... some teams just spend $1.6B to win a championship.

LMAO! All of a sudden these guys are "favorites" but back in March you found every excuse to knock their credibility. Anyway...
I thought that the lame arguement about "buying championships" was no longer a valid arguement since obviously the Yankees haven't won a championship since 2000? That arguement is lame...everyone know that you can't buy a championship. Shit, didn't the Mets come in with the second highest last year....we all know how far they went. Also, Boston's payroll has also been consistently high and at times right behind us in payroll so whats the difference? Haters!
DJ CISC0 3:22 PM - 24 November, 2009
And who's gloating about gold gloves? You have your little theory about the gold glove and that's all good but the truth of the matter is that it's a legit award that's given in a professional sport. And YES we all know that Palmeiro got one with less than 30 games...blah blah blah. Don't get mad because Jeter got 4 in the last six years and there was only ONE Red Sox player to ever get one back in the 70's.
DVDjHardy 3:26 PM - 24 November, 2009
Its not all about Yanks-Sox...nobody really cares as much about 'Yankees' as their fans and ESPN would have you believe. I think I remember a few months back lad saying that "Tex is more deserving of MVP than Jeter" to make a case against you guys saying that he supported Mauer over Jeter only because he hates the Yankees. Anyways...nobody cares. Mauer and Greinke were more deserving than everyone else. Mauer should've been unanimous...Cabrera plays on my team and I don't think he deserved anything besides some good counseling to get his mental issues addressed.
DJ CISC0 4:03 PM - 24 November, 2009
Quote:
Its all about Yanks
That's what I've been trying to say all this time.

Quote:
nobody really cares as much about 'Yankees' as their fans and ESPN would have you believe.
Fact is that when they play away at other stadiums they increase attendance....so someone must give a shit about them...just saying.
dj lad 7:44 PM - 24 November, 2009
Quote:
And who's gloating about gold gloves? You have your little theory about the gold glove and that's all good but the truth of the matter is that it's a legit award that's given in a professional sport. And YES we all know that Palmeiro got one with less than 30 games...blah blah blah. Don't get mad because Jeter got 4 in the last six years and there was only ONE Red Sox player to ever get one back in the 70's.

No. Sorry. No.

The Gold Glove award is not a legitimate award. It's an award voted on by players and managers - people who never get to watch games other than their own. They see highlights and that's it. How are you not getting this? There is literally dozens of examples of poor choices at Gold Glove. Even a player the other day (who voted for Jeter) said that he voted for him because he didn't want to "get a rookie's head big" (referring to Andrus). That's idiotic. Vote for the best fielder. How is this hard for you to follow? This has nothing to do with the Red Sox and everything to do the idea of giving an award to the best fielder. Which routinely doesn't happen.

Quote:
Quote:

Hell, put Teixeira, Sabathia, and Burnett on any team before the season and they'd be the favorites.... some teams just spend $1.6B to win a championship.

LMAO! All of a sudden these guys are "favorites" but back in March you found every excuse to knock their credibility. Anyway...
I thought that the lame arguement about "buying championships" was no longer a valid arguement since obviously the Yankees haven't won a championship since 2000? That arguement is lame...everyone know that you can't buy a championship. Shit, didn't the Mets come in with the second highest last year....we all know how far they went. Also, Boston's payroll has also been consistently high and at times right behind us in payroll so whats the difference? Haters!

It's entirely still valid. Joe Poz said it better than I ever could have right here: joeposnanski.com

"But the Yankees are a whole different argument. They are their own argument. The Yankees are not a big market team. They DWARF big market teams. They are quantitatively different from every other team in baseball and every other team in American sports. They don’t just spend more money than every other team. They spend A LOT more money than every other team. The Boston Red Sox spend $50 million more than the Kansas City Royals? Who cares? The Yankees spend $80 million more than the Boston Red Sox.

The Yankees have a pat hand.

This is the way baseball is structured, and we have reached a point where people simply don’t want to hear any griping about it. Don’t like it? Don’t watch. Some people have stopped watching, I suppose. But many of us keep on because we love baseball and there’s enough randomness in the game itself and enough volatility in the playoffs to distract us from the lunacy of having the game so ridiculously tilted toward one team.

The trouble is that, inevitably, that one team will make good choices. They will put together a team of All-Stars. They will sign a dominant left-handed starter and slugging switch-hitting Gold Glove first baseman and a right-handed starter who throws curveballs that bend like wiffle balls. That team will be a remarkable collection of stars, and they will play often beautiful baseball, and they will win more games than any other team during the season. That team will roll through the playoffs without facing an elimination game or anything resembling real drama — though there will be constant efforts to make it SEEM like there’s drama.

And then: That team that spent $50 million more than any other team, that team with three sure Hall of Famers and as many as four others, that team that bought Milwaukee’s best pitcher and Anaheim’s best hitter and Toronto’s No. 2 starter and Boston’s favorite Idiot and the most expensive player in the history of baseball and so on, that team will win the World Series, and spray champagne on each other, and they will tell you that they won because they came together as a group and kept pulling themselves off the ground and didn’t listen to the doubters.

And then, if you are a not a Yankees fan, you will want to throw up. If you are not a Yankees fan, you are left hoping that next year the randomness of a short playoff series will get the Yankees and allow some other team to win so we can celebrate the hope of Opening Day. And that’s baseball."
dj lad 7:45 PM - 24 November, 2009
Go get your shinebox, Cisco.
dj lad 7:45 PM - 24 November, 2009
:)
lvmez 8:28 PM - 24 November, 2009
i love the fact that you secretly love the yankees. i'll send you an application.
DJ CISC0 9:04 PM - 24 November, 2009
LOL@ shinebox....Goodfellas?

So what if players and managers are the ones that vote. They can't vote for their own players so what's the big deal with that? O.K so they don't "see" them play everyday but at least they DO play with them. I mean I just don't see it as a total waste of an award like you're trying to make it out to be.

I just don't get it with some of you guys...seriously. If the Yankees lose with the biggest payroll we are chokers....if we win then we're buying championships...smh...Like I said before, I'll say it again....EVERY SINGLE team in the game would do the same exact thing if they had Yankee money so don't hate.. congratulate...hate the game for not capping salaries then.

That article had some pretty interesting points but that's about it. It really didn't tell me anything that I didn't already know....like I said before...hate the game.

This was by far the funniest part of that article -

In 2004, the Yankees spent $57 million more in payroll than any other team. I mean, it’s ridiculous from the start but this is pure absurdity. Basically, this is like the Yankees saying: “OK, let’s spend exactly as much as the second-highest payroll in baseball. OK, we’re spending exactly as much. And now … let’s add the Oakland A’s. No, I mean let’s add their whole team, the whole payroll, add it on top and let’s play some ball!”

So this year we actually drop our payroll and only spend 50 mil more than the Mets and win a WS. From 2001-2008 no one was saying shit.
uno seis 9:22 PM - 24 November, 2009
Quote:

I just don't get it with some of you guys...seriously. If the Yankees lose with the biggest payroll we are chokers....if we win then we're buying championships...smh...


actually you new yorkers are the first ones to call the yankees chokers if they don't win...A-Rod anybody? lol
lvmez 9:46 PM - 24 November, 2009
didn't arod carry the yankees into the world series this year? just asking.
uno seis 10:02 PM - 24 November, 2009
indeed he did, after all these years of you guys calling him a choker lol
CMOS 10:07 PM - 24 November, 2009
The yanks won because of pies to the face, not money.

:P
DJ d.range 2:19 AM - 25 November, 2009
Quote:
The yanks won because of pies to the face, not money.

:P


&& kate hudson

lets go mets!
dj lad 3:45 AM - 25 November, 2009
Quote:
LOL@ shinebox....Goodfellas?

So what if players and managers are the ones that vote. They can't vote for their own players so what's the big deal with that? O.K so they don't "see" them play everyday but at least they DO play with them. I mean I just don't see it as a total waste of an award like you're trying to make it out to be.

Yes, it is a waste. Because they don't see all the plays and games (like most sportswriters do, who vote for the MVP/Cy/ROY awards) - I mean, just look at who won the awards this year - not a single one of them in the AL was a bad hitter - or even AVERAGE. 8 very good hitters -- all of them have been at least one all-star game. Are you telling me that should be expected? That all these awesome hitters are also the best fielders at their positions? Doesn't that seem a little odd to you? I mean, come on. Jesus, Adam Jones was an ATROCIOUS outfielder this year.

Quote:
I just don't get it with some of you guys...seriously. If the Yankees lose with the biggest payroll we are chokers....if we win then we're buying championships...smh...Like I said before, I'll say it again....EVERY SINGLE team in the game would do the same exact thing if they had Yankee money so don't hate.. congratulate...hate the game for not capping salaries then.

You're exactly right. And I agree with you - it doesn't change that it's fun (and correct) to bitch about the Yankees doing it, though.

Quote:
That article had some pretty interesting points but that's about it. It really didn't tell me anything that I didn't already know....like I said before...hate the game.

This was by far the funniest part of that article -

In 2004, the Yankees spent $57 million more in payroll than any other team. I mean, it’s ridiculous from the start but this is pure absurdity. Basically, this is like the Yankees saying: “OK, let’s spend exactly as much as the second-highest payroll in baseball. OK, we’re spending exactly as much. And now … let’s add the Oakland A’s. No, I mean let’s add their whole team, the whole payroll, add it on top and let’s play some ball!”

So this year we actually drop our payroll and only spend 50 mil more than the Mets and win a WS. From 2001-2008 no one was saying shit.

Uh, are you kidding? People were bitching every year! Did you read the article? The point wasn't "OMG LOOK AT THE YANKEES THEY WON A TITLE!" it was "They somehow DIDN'T win a title the last 8 year despite outspending every team by a healthy margin and pumping 1.6B into their payroll."
DJ CISC0 1:58 PM - 25 November, 2009
Quote:
The yanks won because of Kate Hudson's pie to the face, not money.

:P
That could be true too :)
DJ CISC0 2:13 PM - 25 November, 2009
I still wouldn't knock an entire award for a few wrong decisions....hey it happens with other type of awards too.
People were not bitching every year so stop that....What people were doing is saying "hey CC is up for grabs this off season...ahhh Yankees will probably just buy him"...shit like that...laughing it off. Now that we actually have something to show for...it back to being an issue.

-I'm going to try and read a lot of those comments in that article this morning since I have some time to spare.
dj lad 3:32 PM - 25 November, 2009
No, the gold glove awards are a joke.

And yes, that's bitching. And the Yankees didn't just get CC. They spent $426M on 3 player last year.
DJ CISC0 4:25 PM - 25 November, 2009
It sounds like it's something you and everyone else need to get over. I mean why waste all this time and energy bitching about something that has no bearing on the end result. Really, the Yanks spent 426 mil on 3 players JUST for last year alone?....Get over it or deal with it....your choice.
dj lad 10:10 AM - 26 November, 2009
Yeah, the Yankees invested $426M in 3 players last year - more than the rest of baseball combined.

Look, if you don't see something wrong with the system that allows for that, I'll just shut up, because you're never going to see why that's a problem for the game that you and I both love.
lvmez 4:57 PM - 28 November, 2009
yanks close to signing halladay. he is ok with the trade. they would have to give up a lot. either a combination of hughes, joba, austin jackson or montero. i would rather see halladay go to the national league. i was hoping the mets would get him.
dj lad 5:17 PM - 28 November, 2009
Hahahaha, close to signing him. Right. They can't sign him unless the Blue Jays sign off on giving them a negotiating window. Otherwise it's just tampering. And no window has been issued.

I don't know where you're getting your info.
dj lad 5:18 PM - 28 November, 2009
This info?

slam.canoe.ca

Really? This is hilarious. It says he'd "approve a trade to the Yankees". Of course he would - they can pay him whatever he wants.
lvmez 5:52 PM - 28 November, 2009
they have the prospects the blue jays want and there aren't too many teams interested. the blue jays would jump all over that in a second.

p.s. what is your mlb team lad? why don't don't you start your own thread. your a hater man. your getting mad a fans because there team won. why don't you write a letter to the yankees expressing your concerns. i'm sure they will respond right away.
dj lad 7:33 PM - 28 November, 2009
This has become the defacto MLB thread. That's why I post in it - much like Hardy does. As for your sarcasm, it's unnecessary. I was pointing out that you can't just "sign Halladay" and that the Yankees are nowhere CLOSE to it considering he'd first have to APPROVE a trade, and then the Yankees would have to be given a 48-hour negotiating window. Your post was wrong, and I was pointing out what was wrong in it. There's no news saying that he is close to signing with the Yankees. None.

As for "aren't too many teams interested" - are you crazy? Every team in baseball is interested in acquiring Roy Halladay. You have no idea, like I do, what prospects the Jays want. We can assume that the Jays would want either Hughes or Joba (although the shine has come off Joba quite a bit), Montero, Jackson, at at least another major-league ready player as well. That's a good haul, but as we saw in the Santana deal - prospects don't always work out. It should also be noted that the Red Sox can offer a similar package (Buchholz, Casey Kelly, Ryan Westmoreland), but I don't think he ends up in the AL East - at least not in this trade. One of the best fits might be with the LA Angels - they could move Napoli and Brandon Wood - two legitimate power hitters who are major-league ready, and a pitcher. The Mets don't have the prospects to move (their system is bare), the Dodgers can't afford him especially with the problems the McCourts are having, and the Cubs are in the process of being sold.

I think the Angels are the most logical place for him to move, but we'll see if it happens.
lvmez 12:04 AM - 29 November, 2009
first place i kow they just can't "sing halladay". i was simply stating that they have a great chance if not the best chance to sign because of what they have to offer the the blue jays. And OF COURSE they are other teams interested in him. just like there were other teams interested in tex. BUT the yankees got him. you keep stating the obvious. your a typical hater. ansd this isn't the only baseball thread. there is a redsox one as well. the bottom line is that we won this year and your losing sleep over it.
lvmez 12:06 AM - 29 November, 2009
and as far as him being a good fit somewhere else. HE WOULD BE A GOOD FIT ANYWHERE! he is that good. and for the record, as a yankee fan, if they get him i would be happy, but i rather they not sign him. he is getting up there in age and will want a long term deal. i rather go younger.
dj lad 2:39 AM - 29 November, 2009
Quote:
and as far as him being a good fit somewhere else. HE WOULD BE A GOOD FIT ANYWHERE! he is that good. and for the record, as a yankee fan, if they get him i would be happy, but i rather they not sign him. he is getting up there in age and will want a long term deal. i rather go younger.

If the signed with the Yankees they'd immediately become prohibitive favorites for the 2012 World Series. He's a top 3 pitcher in baseball for the next 4 years. Why on earth wouldn't you want to sign him?

Quote:
first place i kow they just can't "sing halladay". i was simply stating that they have a great chance if not the best chance to sign because of what they have to offer the the blue jays. And OF COURSE they are other teams interested in him. just like there were other teams interested in tex. BUT the yankees got him. you keep stating the obvious. your a typical hater. ansd this isn't the only baseball thread. there is a redsox one as well. the bottom line is that we won this year and your losing sleep over it.

You didn't write that. The big difference between Teixeira and Halladay, of course, is that Halladay is a) not a free agent and b) doesn't have Scott Boras representing him. Halladay has control over who he gets traded to since he's got a no-trade clause, but it's not the same as being a free agent since the team has to also find a fit for him.

I'm not a typical hater, I'm way more logical than that. :)
DJ CISC0 11:26 PM - 29 November, 2009
Quote:
Yeah, the Yankees invested $426M in 3 players last year - more than the rest of baseball combined.

Look, if you don't see something wrong with the system that allows for that, I'll just shut up, because you're never going to see why that's a problem for the game that you and I both love.
OK "invested" for the next few years is different then "spent last year". If the Yankees were winning the WS EVERY year because of their payroll then yes I would see a problem there. Obviously, that hasn't been the case in almost 10 years. Unbelievable...the Yankees win 1 WS this decade and everyone is back to bitching about their payroll...wtf!?
lvmez 11:33 PM - 29 November, 2009
let them bitch. next time i'll bring some tissues for all the crying they are doing.
DJ CISC0 11:40 PM - 29 November, 2009
Quote:
why don't you write a letter to the yankees expressing your concerns. i'm sure they will respond right away.
LMAO!

Quote:
I'm not a typical hater, I'm way more logical than that. :)
-Keyword- "typical"

The Halladay talks are still in their early stages but I wouldn't be surprised if he lands with the Yankees. All it will take is a pie to the face from AJ and he's in there.
dj lad 12:10 AM - 30 November, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
Yeah, the Yankees invested $426M in 3 players last year - more than the rest of baseball combined.

Look, if you don't see something wrong with the system that allows for that, I'll just shut up, because you're never going to see why that's a problem for the game that you and I both love.
OK "invested" for the next few years is different then "spent last year". If the Yankees were winning the WS EVERY year because of their payroll then yes I would see a problem there. Obviously, that hasn't been the case in almost 10 years. Unbelievable...the Yankees win 1 WS this decade and everyone is back to bitching about their payroll...wtf!?

You completely missed the point of that article - baseball is set up so that you can't win every year. The playoffs are designed that way. But it's also hidden the fact that the system is broken otherwise because it allows teams to outspend other ones by $100M and not blink an eye. How are you still looking past this as a problem? Even when the Yankees weren't winning every year, they STILL were making the playoffs (usually by a healthy margin).
Quote:
Quote:
why don't you write a letter to the yankees expressing your concerns. i'm sure they will respond right away.
LMAO!

Quote:
I'm not a typical hater, I'm way more logical than that. :)
-Keyword- "typical"

The Halladay talks are still in their early stages but I wouldn't be surprised if he lands with the Yankees. All it will take is a pie to the face from AJ and he's in there.

I hate the Yankees. Just like you hate the Red Sox. We're both haters.

Halladay talks? You keep missing the fact that the Yankees simply can't talk to Halladay at all. I wouldn't be surprised if he landed in New york either, but I think you are thinking it's just going to happen. I would put Yankees as 3rd, maybe 4th, on the list of the teams the Jays will move him to. Angels, Atlanta, and Boston all have better (or equal) farm systems and can pay for Halladay just as easily as the Yankees can (and I'm not the one ranking them this way, that's Baseball America - Braves #3, Red Sox #12, Yankees #20, Angels #22 - but the Angels have young major leaguers that can trump anything the other systems can offer up in Napoli, Aybar, and Wood. The Jays may also just not want to move him in the AL east, and considering the Jays wanted something like Buchholz, Masterson, Hagadone, and three other prospects from the Red Sox last summer that the package would be similar for the Yankees - and therefore be prohibitive.
lvmez 2:14 AM - 30 November, 2009
No one thinks it's just going to happen. what are you talking about? just stating they have a GREAT chance to land him because of what they have to offer. it seems like your mad because we are expressing our opinion. you have yours and we have ours. get over it. and i personally care who the redsox sign. i'm not concerned with that. i just want us to win. it seems like you spend to much time caring what others thinks. and bro, all that you just did, waste of time.
lvmez 2:15 AM - 30 November, 2009
*typing
DJ CISC0 2:53 AM - 30 November, 2009
Take it easy there lad...I meant "Halladay talks" in general...not as in the "Yankee/Halladay talks".
dj lad 2:48 AM - 9 December, 2009
Terrific trade by the Yankees. Gave up literally nothing and got back an all-star CF who can play there for the next 7 years.

The only thing I'd be concerned about Granderson is that he cannot hit LHP - last year his OPS against lefties was .484 (career .614). That said he's going to save a lot of runs on defense and will hit 30 homers in Yankee Stadium next year.

I can't believe the Yankees gave up Phil Coke, Ian Kennedy (two basically useless parts) and Austin Jackson (who is a good -not great- prospect) for a top CF. Well done.
lvmez 2:53 AM - 9 December, 2009
with all that protection, he will do fine. at 29 years old i like that they are getting younger. he also covers a lot of ground in the outfield. melky has a strong arm and should be in left.
DPR250R 3:05 AM - 9 December, 2009
Quote:
Terrific trade by the Yankees. Gave up literally nothing and got back an all-star CF who can play there for the next 7 years.

The only thing I'd be concerned about Granderson is that he cannot hit LHP - last year his OPS against lefties was .484 (career .614). That said he's going to save a lot of runs on defense and will hit 30 homers in Yankee Stadium next year.

I can't believe the Yankees gave up Phil Coke, Ian Kennedy (two basically useless parts) and Austin Jackson (who is a good -not great- prospect) for a top CF. Well done.



That must have been difficult for you..... just breakin balls of course :)
DVDjHardy 3:12 AM - 9 December, 2009
I didn't think I could hate the Yankees any more than I already did. I was wrong.
DPR250R 3:29 AM - 9 December, 2009
Quote:
I didn't think I could hate the Yankees any more than I already did. I was wrong.


That was good... lol...
uno seis 4:43 AM - 9 December, 2009
everything i read about this trade is about how the dbacks screwed up by giving up max scherzer...is he THAT good?
DJ CISC0 2:08 PM - 9 December, 2009
I'm also surprised that the Yankees gave up Coke in this deal. Granderson is a great pickup for what the Yanks gave up though. Considering who they wanted from the red sox (ellsbury and buchholz)...this was in a way a steal. The only thing that concerns me is his SO stat and as mentioned before he can't hit left handed pitching. So now the negotiations between Matsui and Damon should get interesting.

Quote:
I didn't think I could hate the Yankees any more than I already did. I was wrong.
LOL! Hardy just lost his favorite Tiger to the Yanks. It's all good man...you can still wear his jersey next year.
DVDjHardy 2:21 PM - 9 December, 2009
Yep, he doesn't hit well against lefties and strikes out a lot. BUT...he's like Derek Jeter, in the sense that even the assholes in NY (sorry, but its true) will love this guy because he really is one of those players that goes all out every game and does a ton of work in the community.

And my favorite Tiger is Brandon Inge. You won't understand why even if I tried to explain....even a lot of local fans don't get it.
DJ CISC0 2:33 PM - 9 December, 2009
Quote:
he really is one of those players that goes all out every game and does a ton of work in the community.
I heard he's a class act as well...NY fans always welcomes new players with open arms when they first join. But if he goes into a 2-3 day slump...that's when we let him have it :) Don't know why but that's the way it's done over here.
DJ CISC0 2:34 PM - 9 December, 2009
Quote:
And my favorite Tiger is Brandon Inge. You won't understand why even if I tried to explain....even a lot of local fans don't get it.
That's right I remember now....care to explain?
DVDjHardy 2:53 PM - 9 December, 2009
More than anything else, I love that he visits the terminally sick kids, at the hospital that I work for, on a regular basis. On the field, he's another guy who works really hard and is one of the top defensive players at 3rd base. Not much of a bat, and never has been. I love that he's still playing for the same team that he lost 119 games with.

You can look at Detroit sports historically, and the biggest fan favorites here are guys who don't run their mouth, play really hard, and do a lot of charitable work in the community. Steve Yzerman, Barry Sanders (helps to be a freakishly amazing talent, too), Ben Wallace, Brandon Inge, etc.

Its weird, but that's how Detroit fans are.
dj lad 3:32 PM - 9 December, 2009
Quote:
I'm also surprised that the Yankees gave up Coke in this deal. Granderson is a great pickup for what the Yanks gave up though. Considering who they wanted from the red sox (ellsbury and buchholz)...this was in a way a steal./quote]
Whoa, I did not hear that. Can you give me a link? There's simply no way that Josh Byrnes (former Sox ass't GM) would want Ellsbury & Buchholz from the Sox.

But yeah, it was a very good deal for the Yankees. A lot depends on him getting his OBP back up (.327 last year), but this looks like it's going to be a GREAT move for the Yankees. The D'Backs gave up talent in Scherzer and MAYBE got back talent in Kennedy, Coke and Jackson.
DJ CISC0 4:41 PM - 9 December, 2009
Hardy....I respect fans like that. I think NY fans take those things into consideration too.

lad- here's 2 links that I found...I can't find the one I read though.
www.boston.com
espn.go.com

Oh yeah...most likely Coke will have the year of his life and start the all star game next year...that's what usually happens when we let young pitchers go for some reason.
dj lad 6:01 PM - 9 December, 2009
Wow, they wanted Ellsbury and Buchholz. That's insane, especially considering the rest of the pieces moving in this deal.
DJ d.range 11:32 PM - 14 December, 2009
sportsillustrated.cnn.com

halladay to philly?
lvmez 12:10 AM - 15 December, 2009
and cliff lee to mariners.
lvmez 12:10 AM - 15 December, 2009
lackey to red sox. 5yrs/85 million.
DJ CISC0 1:53 PM - 15 December, 2009
And Matsui to the Angels...

I'm glad that Halladay is leaving the AL East but I can't believe the Phils gave up Lee for him though. Lets see if he can still dominate in the NL where he will have to pick up a bat this time.

Lackey to the red sox sucks ass but it was a nice move (and pricey). I'm surprised the Mets didn't jump in on some of this action but whatever.
DPR250R 1:59 PM - 15 December, 2009
Quote:
I'm glad that Halladay is leaving the AL East but I can't believe the Phils gave up Lee for him though.


What is the point of that move? How are the Phillies better off now?
DVDjHardy 2:00 PM - 15 December, 2009
Quote:
Lets see if he can still dominate in the NL where he will have to pick up a bat this time.


I think he will dominate without a doubt. Having 3 freebie outs will help him, not that he needs it!
DJ CISC0 2:05 PM - 15 December, 2009
Quote:
Quote:
I'm glad that Halladay is leaving the AL East but I can't believe the Phils gave up Lee for him though.


What is the point of that move? How are the Phillies better off now?
I was asking myself the same question when I found out.
lvmez 5:04 PM - 15 December, 2009
that was a dumbass move by the phillies. not only do they still have ONE ace, they gave up prospects. cliff lee was dominating in that league. i'm just happy he is out of the american league.

lackey was a good move. josh beckett is a free agent next year. i'm sad to see matsui leave.
dj lad 6:34 PM - 15 December, 2009
Here's why Halladay was a good move: he was already the best pitcher in the AL - and he's the PERFECT guy to pitch in Citizen's Bank (lots of ground balls, etc). Moreover, Lee wanted a deal that would get him free agent money -- Halladay was willing to take a deal below market value to go to Philly.

Philly got a better pitcher with Halladay than Lee. Make no mistake. They didn't give up that much to upgrade and instead of gambling on losing Lee after the season, they've guaranteed themselves an ace for the next 4-6 years in Halladay.

Also apparently the Yankees FO is crying about how they think they could have given more for Halladay than what the Phils gave up. Hee hee.
DPR250R 6:42 PM - 15 December, 2009
Quote:
Philly got a better pitcher with Halladay than Lee. Make no mistake. They didn't give up that much to upgrade and instead of gambling on losing Lee after the season, they've guaranteed themselves an ace for the next 4-6 years in Halladay.


So it was a money and contracted starter for the next couple of years deal.... makes sense.
dj lad 6:50 PM - 15 December, 2009
Exactly. Lee might have stayed, he might not have. Halladay is probably a better bet to sustain his success and he's going from pitching in the hardest division in baseball to a pretty easy one (Mets, Nationals, Braves - they can't hit and all have pitchers parks).
DJ CISC0 7:08 PM - 15 December, 2009
After reading a bit more...I can see why this deal went down the way it did. Also, Philly gave up a prospect who already had tommy john surgery?...Wow...imagine a guy who isn't even a pro yet and had this done.

Quote:
Also apparently the Yankees FO is crying about how they think they could have given more for Halladay than what the Phils gave up. Hee hee.
Well there goes that idea that the Yankees "just buy everyone".
dj lad 8:19 PM - 15 December, 2009
That doesn't make any sense, Cisco. Trading prospects is not the same as spending money. Moreover, trading Halladay to a team within your division is so dangerous - that's why you take a little less to move him to a team you'd only see once in a while rather than 19 times a season.
DJ CISC0 8:57 PM - 15 December, 2009
Yeah, I know it's not. I'm just saying that the Yanks would've probably offered a little of both: offered someone or so and gave him CC money for the next few years (maybe not that much). Everyone knows that trading within their own division is a dumb move....I'm just saying that that just goes to show you that the Yankees can't just waive their wallet around.
lvmez 10:12 PM - 15 December, 2009
the yankees are not upset about losing halladay. they are just glad he's out of the american league.
DJ CISC0 10:33 PM - 15 December, 2009
Also, just because Halladay owned in the AL doesn't mean he'll do the same in the NL...I mean he should if you want to go by paper and stats but like I said earlier....you have to factor in the ABs he's going to get....running...risking injury. NL is a different ballgame for pitchers. I'm not saying it's impossible but after playing 12 straight yrs of AL ball that change alone is going play a big role no doubt.

Halladay - Total 12 Yr Career = 38 ABs
Tim Lincecum = 66 ABs Last year alone (179 in 3 years)

That has to count for something. So I really don't think Philly really came off like that in this deal. If anything it looks like the Ms got a great pitcher (WITH post season exp) for next to nothing.
DJ CISC0 10:34 PM - 15 December, 2009
And it sounds like Yanks are not going for Jason Bay? That seems odd.
uno seis 10:45 PM - 15 December, 2009
Having to swing the bat a few times per game will probably not affect Halladay as much as the fact that the NL is a much easier league to pitch in, also considering that the NL East should be MUCH easier to pitch in than the AL East.
DJ d.range 1:10 AM - 16 December, 2009
lets go mets!
DJ CISC0 1:42 AM - 16 December, 2009
Quote:
Having to swing the bat a few times per game will probably not affect Halladay as much as the fact that the NL is a much easier league to pitch in, also considering that the NL East should be MUCH easier to pitch in than the AL East.
Yeah I guess it shouldn't but I always think like this since it's all about treating the pitchers with "care" now a days....with their pitching counts, ice, and all the other pampering they get. I guess I should look at it like the Johan Santana move.

Quote:
lets go mets!
Does Omar still have a job? He hasn't made one single move yet and he's letting all these guys land deals with other teams? If the Mets don't make a strong push for Bay then I think the Mets should buy out the rest of his contract because he's useless at that point. Too bad the Mets are stuck with him until 2012 or something like that.
DJ d.range 2:30 AM - 16 December, 2009
don't remind me =(

i'd also like new ownership
lvmez 4:01 AM - 16 December, 2009
the mets should go after wang. he's cheap and IF he is effective, it will be a score.
dj lad 8:16 AM - 16 December, 2009
Quote:
And it sounds like Yanks are not going for Jason Bay? That seems odd.

Jason Bay is atrocious on defense. The Yankees would be best served by going for Holliday (although it seems unlikely they will match the 8 year deal the Cards offered), or, better, giving Damon a 2 year deal and going after Carl Crawford next season.

Quote:
Also, just because Halladay owned in the AL doesn't mean he'll do the same in the NL...I mean he should if you want to go by paper and stats but like I said earlier....you have to factor in the ABs he's going to get....running...risking injury. NL is a different ballgame for pitchers. I'm not saying it's impossible but after playing 12 straight yrs of AL ball that change alone is going play a big role no doubt.

Halladay - Total 12 Yr Career = 38 ABs
Tim Lincecum = 66 ABs Last year alone (179 in 3 years)

That has to count for something. So I really don't think Philly really came off like that in this deal. If anything it looks like the Ms got a great pitcher (WITH post season exp) for next to nothing.

Halladay is the best pitcher in the hardest division in baseball to pitch in. He moves to the NL East. His ERA+ over the last five years was 146. To compare, Lincecum's career ERA+ has been 152. So it's comparable - ERA+ does not compensate for league, just era they played in and ballpark.

Quote:
Having to swing the bat a few times per game will probably not affect Halladay as much as the fact that the NL is a much easier league to pitch in, also considering that the NL East should be MUCH easier to pitch in than the AL East.

This. Seriously. I could hug you.
DJ CISC0 4:45 PM - 17 December, 2009
I laughed when the red sox introduced Lackey....The guy looks like a typical red sox. LOL...he's a perfect fit. I still can't believe they gave him 5 years though.
dj lad 9:56 PM - 17 December, 2009
Why not? The Yankees gave Burnett, a far more serious injury risk and two years older, a five-year deal. Lackey has thrown the 12th most innings in baseball since the start of the 2003 season - he's far more likely to remain healthy than Burnett is (he's 40th on that list). Guys with at least 500 innings since 2003 -- Lackey's ERA+ is 116, good for 32nd. Burnett is 45th.

I'm confused about why you think 5 years is a bad deal - if anything, it's good since they are getting him for what typically a pitcher's most stable years - their 31-35 seasons.

Moreover, it gives the Red Sox the best rotation in baseball. If Buchholz' improvement over the last three months (after August 7th) of last season is to believed (3.72 ERA with only three really bad starts where he was hammered, the rest were excellent), and if Daisuke bounces back to his 2008 levels (completely believable since his last four starts were great) then yes, the league is in trouble.

The Red Sox have decided to forgo great run production for this season in favor of great run prevention. An everyday defense of Ellsbury/Cameron/Drew in the outfield is a top 3 and an infield of either Beltre (if he signs) or Kotchman/Youkilis/Scutaro/Pedroia will be a wall of it's own. The defense is going to be spectacular. I love the Cameron signing - he gives you basically 80% of Bay's offense and about 300% of his defense (Bay has been dreadful on defense the last few years) and does it at what will likely be 1/5th of what Bay gets.

I'll ignore the "typical Red Sox" comment since you guys signed a first baseman last year that looks like Rachel Maddow.

swandiver.files.wordpress.com
DJ CISC0 2:42 PM - 18 December, 2009
You can't set the deal Burnett got as some sort of bar for pitching deals. The Yankees clearly gave him a lot of money right off the bat to prevent other teams from getting at him. I also felt at the time that is was too many years for him as well due to his history of injuries.....just like Lackey. And FYI I think Lackey is the better pitcher. I would of gave him 3 years...4 tops. 5 just seems like forever to me.

Not to mention the fact that he hasn't given the Angels 200IP in the last 2 seasons.

I always liked Cameron as a all around player so I like that deal but hate it that he's on the sox.

LOL@ Rachel Maddow....that doesn't even come close to looking like him.
dj lad 3:22 PM - 18 December, 2009
The problem with that is that this is Lackey's first big FA contract and he's not going to sign for 3 years. For the same reason the Yankees gave Burnett 5 years, the Sox gave Lackey 5 years - they can afford to do it. The Red Sox gave Lackey 5 years basically to stop the Angels from matching it.

And yes, Mark Teixeira looks like Rachel Maddow.

images.icanhascheezburger.com

It even comes up as a suggested Google search - hahahahaha!!!
dj lad 3:27 PM - 18 December, 2009
BTW, I LOVE the Nick Johnson deal for the Yankees - got him for cheap and on a short deal. Assuming he stays healthy and gives the Yankees 130 games (which would be great), he's going to score 120 runs hitting in front of A-Rod and Teixeira, if not more. If he can find a way to stay healthy all year and play 150 games, he's going to score 140 runs. Unreal.
DJ CISC0 3:46 PM - 18 December, 2009
My co-worker just told me about the Nick Johnson talks when I walked in this morning but I didn't know anything about it. I always liked him as a player, good D, sweet swing, good dude. I was disappointed when they traded him to Montreal for Vasquez.

LOL! I guess when you put them side by side like that then yeah I guess they could resemble each other.
DJ CISC0 4:11 PM - 18 December, 2009
If the Yanks get Johnson for about 5M that would be a nice deal. Anything more than that would be overpay. He's another one who constantly gets hurt.

By the way, I stumbled on this column on espn...."Best And Worst Teams Of The Decade"...guess who was on top.

sports.espn.go.com
dj lad 4:19 PM - 18 December, 2009
I can't really disagree.

They won two championships (tied for most), made the playoffs (almost) every season, won the most games, and spent the most money.
DJ CISC0 5:25 PM - 18 December, 2009
Quote:
and spent the most money.
This will never end huh?
dj lad 9:28 PM - 18 December, 2009
What do you think?
DVDjHardy 5:20 AM - 21 December, 2009
I had to share this with the people in this thread...

I went to a Christmas party at a good friend's house which was mostly his family and a handful of friends. While there, I met one of his cousins, who is a Red Sox fan - originally from Boston, now living in NYC and married to a Yankees fan! I thought this was impossible, haha! I wonder how many arguments they have about their teams...
bill-e 7:56 AM - 21 December, 2009
i fucking hate baseball
DPR250R 1:19 PM - 21 December, 2009
Quote:
I had to share this with the people in this thread...

I went to a Christmas party at a good friend's house which was mostly his family and a handful of friends. While there, I met one of his cousins, who is a Red Sox fan - originally from Boston, now living in NYC and married to a Yankees fan! I thought this was impossible, haha! I wonder how many arguments they have about their teams...


I think it would be fun to be with a girl who is a New England sports fan.... unless she took it TOO seriously.

I went on a camping trip over the summer where I only knew a couple people. This one guy that was there had a "B" tattoo on his ankle. I tried to keep my mouth shut but after drinking a little i asked him about it. He had to be the coolest Sox fan I ever met. Just loved baseball... without the hatred for this or that.
dj lad 7:28 PM - 21 December, 2009
My father is a Yankees fan (born in the Bronx), my mother is a Red Sox fan (born in Boston).

They're divorced now.
lvmez 8:06 PM - 21 December, 2009
i hope you went to live with your dad.
Nicky Blunt 10:51 PM - 21 December, 2009
Quote:
i hope you went to live with your dad.


hahahaha thats pretty fucked up!

But very funny!
DJ CISC0 12:32 AM - 22 December, 2009
Quote:
My father is a Yankees fan (born in the Bronx), my mother is a Red Sox fan (born in Boston).

They're divorced now.
HAHA! That must've been good times watching them go at each other during the seasons.
DJ CISC0 4:12 PM - 22 December, 2009
So the Yankees trade Melky to bring back Javier Vazquez.....I thought we were going for Ben Sheets?
lvmez 10:29 PM - 22 December, 2009
good trade, didn't give much up. Vazquez should be a good 4th starter.
dj lad 11:44 PM - 22 December, 2009
That's a great trade for Javy, assuming he doesn't wilt under the pressure of NY. Melky Cabrera would be a nobody in Kansas City, but because he made a catch a few years ago against the Red Sox that was unfairly compared to Willie Mays, he has some weird legend status.

A career .716 OPS. He's not a great player and he's certainly not a worthy "starter" for a team that can pay for a Jason Bay/Matt Holliday/Johnny Damon type.
lvmez 3:03 AM - 23 December, 2009
i would like to see derosa here.
dj lad 5:30 AM - 23 December, 2009
He'd be a good fit for the Yankees as a super-sub, but the problem is that he wants to start - and he's good enough to do so.
DJ CISC0 3:43 PM - 23 December, 2009
Quote:
That's a great trade for Javy, assuming he doesn't wilt under the pressure of NY. Melky Cabrera would be a nobody in Kansas City, but because he made a catch a few years ago against the Red Sox that was unfairly compared to Willie Mays, he has some weird legend status.
LOL ! Yeah, Vasquez left on a bad note with Yankee fans back in 04. But I think he should do well this time around. How did the Braves even see this trade as being a fair one? Vazquez for Melky and a minor leaguer? C'mon....I don't think Melky had any type of legendary type of status at all. He played hard every time I watched him play though and that is one thing that teams look for in players. So even though I never really pictured him growing with the Yanks, he was a decent player.
uno seis 9:19 PM - 23 December, 2009
I think that's the point. He was ok/decent, taking up a starting outfield spot on a team that can afford to sign a MUCH more productive player to take his spot.
dj lad 2:15 AM - 24 December, 2009
I dunno. Do you know HOW often I'd listen to sports radio in NYC and you'd hear some jackass talking about "The Melkman" as though he was the best centerfielder since Mantle?
DJ CISC0 2:04 PM - 24 December, 2009
^ That applies to a lot of sports guys...they always want to have a nickname for someone. Even average players get nicknames.
dj lad 7:06 AM - 25 December, 2009
No, I get that. But even listening to national sports radio programs, fans from other teams showed strange interest in Cabrera (one Cubs fan the other day on XM was talking about him as "finally a great replacement in CF that the Cubbies can use for the next decade".

Regardless, my point is that he was vastly overrated simply because he played in a major market. It happens to a lot of players.
lvmez 5:03 PM - 25 December, 2009
in ny he was never overrated. he was just an exciting playing for us. he was never going to be a starter.
DJ CISC0 10:42 PM - 26 December, 2009
Quote:
(one Cubs fan the other day on XM was talking about him as "finally a great replacement in CF that the Cubbies can use for the next decade".
Wow...sounds like that dude needs to get slapped.

Here's a very strange Melkey vid
Watchwww.youtube.com
tig ol' bitties 2:17 AM - 29 December, 2009
YANKEES SUCKKKK!
DJ CISC0 2:51 PM - 29 December, 2009
LOL! Welcome back to the thread Tig...how did you like the season?
DJ CISC0 4:40 PM - 29 December, 2009
Quote:
i would like to see derosa here.
Looks like the Giants "grabbed him from the Yankees". www.playerpress.com
DJ d.range 9:08 PM - 29 December, 2009
Quote:
YANKEES SUCKKKK!



More than half of your message contains capital letters. To many forum users this means you are SHOUTING your message, and is considered bad forum etiquette. Please consider editing your message so that there are fewer capital letters.
tig ol' bitties 3:06 PM - 30 December, 2009
The Sox were a bunch of pussies this year...

Paplebon needs to work on at least 1 new pitch if not 2 and use it consistently...his shitty 96 mph straight down the middle fastball is shit.

I was ready to boycott this upcming season if they traded Mikey MVP Lowell for some shit bum like they were planning on doing...glad it fell thru. Mike is going .285 / 17 HRs / 85 RBIs this season...and will retire a happy man and ill be there cheering his old ass on the whole way.

I am not pleased with the off season acquisitions so far, I do like Lackey...but if Theo needs a bat and I think getting rid of Ellsbury or any stud pitcher will be a big mistake...altho that appears to be the only bait for someone like beltre or cabrera...I think they should have forked the loot over for Bay and just been done with it...we will see what pans out...

As far as last season, the Yanks had the best team...no injuries really and they jus did what there 200 million dollar payroll should have done for once...

With Damon and Godzilla gone, next year won't be so easy tho
tig ol' bitties 3:07 PM - 30 December, 2009
Granderson will be a bust. He can't ahndle the lightss of NYC
DJ CISC0 9:20 PM - 30 December, 2009
Quote:
Jason Bay will be a bust. He can't ahndle the lightss of NYC
Fixed it for you. And where did Damon go?
dj lad 1:04 AM - 31 December, 2009
I hope they trade Lowell. He's an old man who has worse range than my grandma. And she's dead.
lvmez 1:09 AM - 31 December, 2009
they are stuck with him. his injuries will prevent any trade. he is a great player to have on the bench.

back to the yankees: who is out there that can play the outfield? do you think the rays would crawford since he is a free agent next year? he is not staying in tampa.
DJ CISC0 2:42 PM - 31 December, 2009
Quote:
I hope they trade Lowell. He's an old man who has worse range than my grandma. And she's dead.
I agree. Not to mention that he always has this depressed look on his face...Almost like he doesn't even want to be on the field.
DJ CISC0 5:23 AM - 5 January, 2010
Wow...so the red sox get Beltre? I didn't see that one coming. So they are paying about 22 million for two 3B men this year?
lvmez 2:13 PM - 5 January, 2010
they actually have 3 third baseman.
dj lad 6:41 AM - 6 January, 2010
Not really. They have 2. Youkilis is now a first baseman who can play third if necessary (which was last year).

They will move Lowell's corpse before the start of the season as well.
lvmez 10:43 PM - 6 January, 2010
they still have 3 legit 3rd baseman. right? even though he is not playing third youk is a great 3rd baseman. always trying to be so technical lad. lol.
dj lad 8:43 AM - 7 January, 2010
What the Red Sox have done is create a team with a lot of flexibility. Take a look:
Martinez
Youkilis
Scutaro
Ellsbury
Cameron
Drew
Lowrie

Can all play multiple positions skillfully (and yes, I count being able to play LF/CF/RF as separate positions because they are, especially in Fenway with the angles of the outfield) - that allows for a LOT of options in terms of what the team can do on a daily basis. Put Lowrie at short, Youkilis at 3rd, Scutaro at 2nd, Martinez at 1st, Varitek behind the plate? Yup. That's really helpful in terms of injuries - if someone gets hurt at an infield position, they aren't crippled or have to play someone either or out of position or bring up an untested minor leaguer. Being able to run Ellsbury out there in LF, CF or RF, while Drew can play CF or RF and Cameron can also play all three OF spots - thats incredibly helpful for LHP/RHP matchups.
DJ CISC0 7:44 PM - 7 January, 2010
Good point. I knew the sox had a few multi-position players, but not that many. I doubt they will move Youk to third though...that's why they picked up Beltre. I would also have Martinez catching more, Veritek as backup, with Ortiz still at DH.


Nice lineup no doubt.....and with that said....who knows...they might even win the wildcard again this year :)
dj lad 10:29 PM - 7 January, 2010
The big concern I have is the offense - the whole "run prevention" thing had better work out because this team is going to play a lot of 4-2, 3-1, 5-4 games.
DJ CISC0 6:30 PM - 8 January, 2010
So my boss (the Mets fan) walks by my desk and I'm like:

ME: So the only move the Mets made was getting Bay? What's up with that?

HIM: Yeah so....."Did you know that the Yankees were the only team this year that had to pay a luxury tax of 25 million?

ME: So now everyone's back at complaining about the how Yankees buy playoff spots and rings? It's been 10 years since the Yankees won.

HIM: Back to it? I never stopped saying it!

At that point I changed the topic to the Jets...it's review time so I had to hold back...
DJ CISC0 8:47 PM - 11 January, 2010
Anyone shocked by this?
www.huffingtonpost.com
uno seis 8:51 PM - 11 January, 2010
Quote:
Anyone shocked by this?
www.huffingtonpost.com

nope haha
DJ CISC0 9:05 PM - 11 January, 2010
I'm shocked he finally admitted it. I thought he was going to take it to the grave. I guess he needed to do that if he wanted to show his face in baseball again.
lvmez 10:22 PM - 11 January, 2010
he took steroids?! i hope bonds didn't take steroids too!
DJ CISC0 10:27 PM - 11 January, 2010
I wonder how much this is worth now.
www.spawn.com
DJ CISC0 1:16 AM - 25 January, 2010
Pitchers and catchers in about 24 days.

Anyway...
A-Rod gets the post-season MVP. myespn.go.com

Unfortunately, I can't argue with the comments from the fans....The game itself is turning into a damn circus.
DJ CISC0 12:54 AM - 3 June, 2010
They seriously have to do something about these umps calling these games...It happened a few times in the Yankees favor the other day and a badly botched call in tonights perfect game in Detroit.
lvmez 1:19 AM - 3 June, 2010
shop.mlb.com

this will make you feel better cisco. i just ordered mine.
DVDjHardy 1:39 AM - 3 June, 2010
DVDjHardy 1:39 AM - 3 June, 2010
AND FUCK JIM JOYCE!
DJ CISC0 1:41 AM - 3 June, 2010
I just noticed I bumped the old thread....oh well..
Yo Ivmez...I heard DJ something earlier when they were showing those shirts on TV but by the time I looked at what they were talking about..it was gone. That shirt is going to get copped for sure.
lvmez 1:48 AM - 3 June, 2010
Quote:
AND FUCK JIM JOYCE!


this would have been perfect in the "Detroit tigers thread".
DJ CISC0 1:50 AM - 3 June, 2010
lol....i highly doubt that will happen. They should but they won't.
DVDjHardy 1:52 AM - 3 June, 2010
Quote:
Quote:
AND FUCK JIM JOYCE!


this would have been perfect in the "Detroit tigers thread".


how about you shut the fuck up too.
DVDjHardy 1:54 AM - 3 June, 2010
Here's the list:

1. Jim Joyce.
2. lvmez
3. BP

Don't get on this list!
lvmez 2:01 AM - 3 June, 2010
your such a loser dude. your so easy to hook. your looking for simpathy in a yankee thread? suck a dick.
dj cubicle 2:04 AM - 3 June, 2010
Quote:
suck a dick.


funny, that's how everyone feels about yankees fans.
DJ CISC0 2:08 AM - 3 June, 2010
Take it easy guys..Its not that serious.
DVDjHardy 2:15 AM - 3 June, 2010
Quote:
your such a loser dude. your so easy to hook. your looking for simpathy in a yankee thread? suck a dick.


Not everyone is on your team. Go find Dale.
DVDjHardy 2:19 AM - 3 June, 2010
By the way, failing to learn the difference between "your" and "you're" = loser. Crawl back to the hole you came from.
lvmez 2:24 AM - 3 June, 2010
you hit a new low. you have to talk about spelling. loser.
DVDjHardy 2:42 AM - 3 June, 2010
This is why baseball is such a great sport. Everyone from Schilling to Halladay are speaking out in support of Galarraga. Every single Tigers players played it off as unfortunate mistake and said they have no hard feelings against Joyce. Even Jim Joyce apologized to Leyland and Galarraga and admimtted that he was wrong.

But you have the baseball douchebags of the world - Yankee fans like lvmez - who show their douche character. Fuck the Yankees!
lvmez 2:45 AM - 3 June, 2010
loser. still in the yankee thread. lol. go buy a box of tissues.
DVDjHardy 2:52 AM - 3 June, 2010
Your mom will suck it off, no need for tissues.
DVDjHardy 2:54 AM - 3 June, 2010
DVDjHardy 2:55 AM - 3 June, 2010
DVDjHardy 2:55 AM - 3 June, 2010
DVDjHardy 2:56 AM - 3 June, 2010
DVDjHardy 2:57 AM - 3 June, 2010
DVDjHardy 2:58 AM - 3 June, 2010
DVDjHardy 2:58 AM - 3 June, 2010
DVDjHardy 2:59 AM - 3 June, 2010
DVDjHardy 3:00 AM - 3 June, 2010
lvmez 3:02 AM - 3 June, 2010
the fact you took time to look that up shows everyone that your a loser who is secretly obsessed with the yankees. lol.
lvmez 3:03 AM - 3 June, 2010
Quote:
Your mom will suck it off, no need for tissues.



mother jokes? bro, your a child. that shows your lack of intelligence.
dj cubicle 3:05 AM - 3 June, 2010
i kan spel.
DJ CISC0 3:16 AM - 3 June, 2010
Damn Hardy! Don't hold back on your feelings about the Yankees.

Ivmez- This is the most nation wide coverage that the Tigers are going to get this decade....let Hardy vent a little.
DJ CISC0 3:18 AM - 3 June, 2010
BTW- Granderson is doing great over here...miss him? LOL!
dj lad 3:41 PM - 3 June, 2010
Wait for real this is going on?

Is someone actually happy that Galarraga didn't get his perfect game? For real?

I mean... CMON SON.
dj lad 3:41 PM - 3 June, 2010
Quote:
shop.mlb.com

this will make you feel better cisco. i just ordered mine.

That's a really fucking ugly shirt.
DJ CISC0 7:18 PM - 3 June, 2010
Not going to lie but wifey said the same thing...lol! I'm still going to buy it and actually wear it.

I don't think anyone is "happy" that he didnt get it....but I'll be upset if Selig overturns the call though....It's messed up yeah but hey it's part of the game right?
dj cubicle 9:02 PM - 3 June, 2010
Quote:
Not going to lie but wifey said the same thing...lol! I'm still going to buy it and actually wear it.

I don't think anyone is "happy" that he didnt get it....but I'll be upset if Selig overturns the call though....It's messed up yeah but hey it's part of the game right?


...and let's be honest here, if it was going to happen to any team in the country, it would be Detroit. Just keep piling it on folks! The odds of us all going postal on the same day is small, right?
DJ CISC0 2:05 AM - 5 June, 2010
I love how the Blue Jays have 94 HRs this early in the season...that's 17 more than Boston. If that would've been the Yankees, we would've been back to talking about wind tunnels and other nonsense.

Yeah but AJ got rocked tonight.
dj lad 8:37 AM - 5 June, 2010
A fun fact:

The 4th place team in the AL East (the Jays) has as many wins as any other division leader in baseball.

That's fucking CRAZY.

Also Jose Bautista is just absurd.
DJ CISC0 1:19 AM - 8 September, 2010
Quote:
Also Jose Bautista is just absurd.
And he's still killing it. It's a shame because the Jays arent going to even smell the playoffs.

Anyway, yeah September baseball is finally here and the Yanks are sitting pretty. The Sox on the other hand...well sorry, it looks like there isn't going to be a free pass for you this year.

The fact the Yanks are winning all these games without ARod just shows how good this team really is.
DVDjHardy 1:27 AM - 8 September, 2010
Rangers > Yankees.
lvmez 3:42 AM - 8 September, 2010
yankees > tigers
DJ CISC0 3:54 AM - 8 September, 2010
Quote:
Rangers > Yankees.
Hardy, you my dude (no homo) but, this sounds like some straight haterade. The Yanks got Granderson now so you must like them just a little right?

The only team that will make the Yanks break a sweat is TB....Forget the rest. Like I said before, it's going to be a NY vs PHI rematch.
DVDjHardy 11:26 AM - 8 September, 2010
Quote:
Quote:
Rangers > Yankees.
Hardy, you my dude (no homo) but, this sounds like some straight haterade. The Yanks got Granderson now so you must like them just a little right?

The only team that will make the Yanks break a sweat is TB....Forget the rest. Like I said before, it's going to be a NY vs PHI rematch.


You don't think both the Rangers and Rays have a better 1-2 starting pitcher combo than the Yankees? CC at home has been really impressive. CC on the road could lose to a good team.
slimmjimm 12:04 PM - 8 September, 2010
I think the Rangers have an equal(ish) 1-2, and a great team, but look at their division. I'm really surprised where they are, since my pick would have been the Mariners at the beginning of the season.

The Rays also have a great team, and I'm glad that there is real competition in the east, besides the Sox and Yankees, but if the Rays had that much of a better team, why aren't they in 1st right now? Regardless of what happens with the division, it's obvious the wild card is going to either the Rays or the Yankees, so it's pretty much a moot point save for the bragging rights.

The Yankees of course have a great team, but they are winning (and in first) without key players and pitching, just imagine if they get straightened out. Pitching is the biggest concern. CC will be CC, AJ is questionable, but they survived with his Jekyll and Hyde in the post season last year and I don't see much of a reason they couldn't this year. Pettitte is great in the post season, and they have time (though limited) to get him back on track. I don't know how they will handle Hughes' innings limit in the post season, but he has been good enough this year.

The ALCS will be Yankees and Rangers, and will probably go the full 7, if Lee is healthy.

The NL race is a crazy one, and I think there are a lot of surprises still left for everybody.
DJ CISC0 4:38 PM - 8 September, 2010
Quote:
You don't think both the Rangers and Rays have a better 1-2 starting pitcher combo than the Yankees?
TB maybe, TEX no.

Just like slimmjimm said, take a look at their division...it sucks so bad. We actually beat Texas 4 out of 5 games this year so this weekend will be an interesting one. Here is what the starting pitching looks like now :

Vazquez vs Wilson
Hughes vs Hunter
Burnett vs Lee

I also find it interesting that you can't find a Cano critic anymore...where did they all go? lad?
lvmez 8:59 PM - 8 September, 2010
you mean a yankee critic. everyone was destrying us at begining of season. it's been quiet in here.
lvmez 12:26 PM - 15 September, 2010
finally a win. need to win today. september is going to be tough for yankees. thank god we are getting petite back.
DJ CISC0 8:25 PM - 15 September, 2010
Yeah it was about time. It really sucked that we got swept and slipped out of first for a sec too. Nothing like September baseball....perfect time for Pettitte to come back.
slimmjimm 12:06 AM - 16 September, 2010
That win was huuuuge last night, Granderson's catch, Jorge's drive and Golson's double up. You didn't even need to watch the whole game, some of the best half hour of baseball this season.

Monday night was a great game as well, sucks the Yankees lost, but fun to watch.
DJ CISC0 3:50 AM - 22 September, 2010
Just got back from tonight's game...suite skybox too! I'm not gonna lie...Joba had me shook with the bases loaded. Let's see this sweep happen.
lvmez 12:45 PM - 22 September, 2010
they are clicking at right time.
Banana_Peter 4:05 PM - 22 September, 2010
Gooooooooooooooooo Yankeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeessssssssss!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DJ CISC0 10:20 PM - 25 September, 2010
Bad, bad times right now. This series sucks!
lvmez 2:11 AM - 26 September, 2010
looks like Geradi threw the towel. right now it looks they will have a hard time winning 3 games to clinch. the only silver lining is that we will be playing the twins. they are super good but for some reason the yanks have there number. hopefully it doesn't change this post season.
slimmjimm 5:41 AM - 26 September, 2010
I'm just hoping there is no epic collapse, they're playing pretty flat right now. I'm not saying the sky is falling, but I am a bit concerned.
DVDjHardy 9:09 AM - 26 September, 2010
Yankees suck.
Banana_Peter 2:23 PM - 26 September, 2010
Quote:
Yankees suck.


*blocked!*
slimmjimm 6:38 PM - 26 September, 2010
Quote:
Yankees suck.


Yes, as of late thy are definitely not playing up to their potential.
DJ CISC0 1:22 AM - 29 September, 2010
LOL @ The Rays crying about still not having enough fans coming out to support them. They're even thinking about giving away 20,000 tickets....sad if you ask me.

You play Baseball so bad...

sports.espn.go.com
lvmez 11:48 AM - 29 September, 2010
it's crazy that the rays have a great chance of going tall the way and there stadium will be half filled. i'm thinking about going to florida to check out a game if the yankees end up playing them. i might not have to spend the money, the way the yankees are pitching.
slimmjimm 12:23 PM - 29 September, 2010
I side with the players on this one.
lvmez 1:19 AM - 2 October, 2010
the rays are giving the division to the yankees and they can't take advantage. doesn't look good. no home field advatage for the enitre playoff run.

om another note. i got some tickets for the playoffs. should be fun.
DJ CISC0 9:14 PM - 3 October, 2010
Unbelievable! I hate the Red Sox....Tough playoffs coming up.
lvmez 2:46 AM - 4 October, 2010
it was a great series. i didn't expect anything less from sox. the silver lining is that we play well against the twins.
slimmjimm 1:35 PM - 4 October, 2010
I don't remember, was the rotation in shambles when we played the Twins? Anyone care to post the starters from that series?

Would have liked to get home field, but it just wasn't meant to be. No matter what happened yesterday, NL has the home field this year, so you gotta play that much better.
lvmez 2:29 PM - 4 October, 2010
cc, hughes and petite.
Banana_Peter 4:55 PM - 4 October, 2010
Quote:
Unbelievable! I hate the Red Sox....Tough playoffs coming up.


Screw Red Sux
DJ CISC0 11:41 PM - 4 October, 2010
The Twins are playing without Morneau for the entire post season.....Yanks better take advantage of this! myespn.go.com
lvmez 1:19 AM - 8 October, 2010
not dominating but doing what we have to do to win. i'd like to sweep so that we can rest CC for next series.
DJ CISC0 5:27 PM - 8 October, 2010
The Yanks simply just own the Twins in post season. Hit and runs, stolen bases, everything hits with RISP...they're doing it all. They need to really turn it up though when they face Texas or the Rays.....oh yeah, Granderson is so clutch.
lvmez 1:01 PM - 10 October, 2010
great series for yankees, especially because CC didn't have to pitch twice.
DJ CISC0 9:12 PM - 10 October, 2010
That was easy.

As the Rangers and Rays continue to beat each other up....the Yanks will be resting and playing the waiting game.
slimmjimm 2:22 PM - 13 October, 2010
Not too thrilled AJ is starting game 4. I understand that we can't go with a 3 man rotation every postseason, but I would rather him start game 3 opposite Cliff Lee, that is assuming Lee is on. If Lee pitches good (which I don't doubt he will) and AJ pitches a bad game 4 (which I don't doubt is likely) it's a possible 2 game deficit (also assuming we win the first two)

But like I said before, AJ pitched good enough last year, so you never know.

The NLCS i going to be a must watch as well. The pitching is filthy.
DJ CISC0 3:42 AM - 14 October, 2010
I don't know about AJ...dude is nervous to watch. The Yanks need to just support him with runs cause he will give up some runs...it's just a matter of how many.

I'm shocked that the Rays got bumped so early...sucks to be a Tampa fan...oh well.
slimmjimm 11:54 AM - 14 October, 2010
I read that he hit two batters in a simulated game...smh... At least he's thinking and said he's going to try to use that to his advantage, so batters won't want to be in the box.

The Rays, sadly, depending on what happens, probably won't contend for a while. Supposedly the have a few good replacement for who they will lose to FA.

I just also want to add, that the Rays want to cut payroll from $72mil to under $60mil. That's a great way to be. Finish with the best record in the fucking AL EAST, and throw it all away. I understand that the fans can be thin at times, but you give yourself no chance to get fans like that. You need to build something, nit tear it down. You don't need to spend like the Yankees, but that $12mil would probably pay for Crawford. If he leaves all you have is Longoria, and how long is he going to be happy in last place?
Banana_Peter 1:23 PM - 14 October, 2010
I live in Dallas and you know I'm gonna sport my Derek Jeter jersey all week...maybe two. I won't wash it until the series is over
DVDjHardy 3:49 PM - 14 October, 2010
Quote:

I just also want to add, that the Rays want to cut payroll from $72mil to under $60mil. That's a great way to be. Finish with the best record in the fucking AL EAST, and throw it all away. I understand that the fans can be thin at times, but you give yourself no chance to get fans like that. You need to build something, nit tear it down. You don't need to spend like the Yankees, but that $12mil would probably pay for Crawford. If he leaves all you have is Longoria, and how long is he going to be happy in last place?


While I agree with you that they shouldn't cut the payroll, I think the Rays will still be pretty competitive. Even in that whore of a division. Their manager and pitching are their two biggest strengths, IMO. Losing Crawford definitely won't help, but that's not gonna make them worse the O's.
DJ CISC0 4:04 PM - 14 October, 2010
Lee + Crawford = future Yankees
lvmez 4:11 PM - 14 October, 2010
i'm sure the rays have young talent in the farm system that are ready to play. they will be fine. yanks need to get younger. they only have one postion available, outfielder. i also wouldn't mind getting a younger catcher. make jorge a dh. he can't throw any one out.
slimmjimm 10:02 PM - 14 October, 2010
Quote:
i'm sure the rays have young talent in the farm system that are ready to play. they will be fine. yanks need to get younger. they only have one postion available, outfielder. i also wouldn't mind getting a younger catcher. make jorge a dh. he can't throw any one out.



Sure they have good talent in the farm right now, but they're draft picks are now lower, and any trade they try to pull off to have some semblance of a chance is going to require some of their previous picks.

I know they're not going to unload the farm, and my whole scenario above really won't be a problem, but I just need something to bitch about while I hear "The Yankees bought the championship"


Quote:
Lee + Crawford = future Yankees


Possibly, but even I don't want a gozillion dollar payroll, simply for the bullshit you have to hear, and you know, I actually like to watch a crisp game every now and again.

I was glad that we didn't get Lee after he went down, it always happens to the Yankees like that, sure most of the time it was older players, but still and all, it did happen numerous times. I'd say out of the two, I would want Lee, you can always find a serviceable fielder somewhere.
slimmjimm 10:05 PM - 14 October, 2010
As far as the Jorge thing, yeah I agree, but he always sucked at throwing out runners. I gotta say, I like Cervelli, Give him a chance, and let Posada become the backup, a la Girardi.
lvmez 11:10 AM - 16 October, 2010
very BIG win last night. yankees did what they used to do to pedro when he pitched for boston. pedro would dominate for 7 innings and then the yanks would jump all over relievers.
Banana_Peter 1:51 PM - 16 October, 2010
LOL I live here in Dallas and none of my friends responded to my texts AFTER the game. They sent me mad messages during the game up to 7th inning....bastards
DJ CISC0 3:33 PM - 18 October, 2010
LOL...That game will be a Yankee classic...hands down. The faces on the Ranger fans were priceless.

Tonight should be a great game with Pettitte and Lee facing off.

Quote:
pedro would dominate for 7 innings and then the yanks would jump all over relievers.
Those games were great!
DJ CISC0 3:35 PM - 18 October, 2010
Good thing the playoffs are not on channel 5 this year. Cablevision is shitting on everyone right now as they pulled channel 5 and 9. Hopefully they can straighten that out in time for the WS.
slimmjimm 6:33 PM - 18 October, 2010
Can I be worried for tonight?
DJ CISC0 6:41 PM - 18 October, 2010
Pettitte holds the record for most post season wins for a reason...I would say that the Yankees are ok. Plus, they are back in the BX.
Banana_Peter 10:00 PM - 18 October, 2010
Quote:
Plus, they are back in the BX.
Banana_Peter 1:42 PM - 19 October, 2010
cot dammit
DJ CISC0 4:01 PM - 19 October, 2010
I was hoping someone would run on to the field and tackle Lee breaking his leg or something....lol
slimmjimm 7:31 PM - 19 October, 2010
Andy did all he could, one bad pitch. Our bullpen sealed the fate of that game.
DJ CISC0 4:01 AM - 20 October, 2010
Holy FML!
DVDjHardy 4:12 AM - 20 October, 2010
Quote:
Quote:
Rangers > Yankees.
Hardy, you my dude (no homo) but, this sounds like some straight haterade. The Yanks got Granderson now so you must like them just a little right?

The only team that will make the Yanks break a sweat is TB....Forget the rest. Like I said before, it's going to be a NY vs PHI rematch.

Quote:
Quote:
Rangers > Yankees.
Hardy, you my dude (no homo) but, this sounds like some straight haterade. The Yanks got Granderson now so you must like them just a little right?

The only team that will make the Yanks break a sweat is TB....Forget the rest. Like I said before, it's going to be a NY vs PHI rematch.


oh hai!
lvmez 2:45 AM - 23 October, 2010
pitching, pitching, pitching. hurt us.
DVDjHardy 7:20 AM - 23 October, 2010
Yankees suck!
lvmez 12:18 PM - 23 October, 2010
we are better than the tigers.
DVDjHardy 3:00 PM - 23 October, 2010
Yankees suck!
DJ CISC0 4:50 PM - 23 October, 2010
I'm not gonna lie, the Yanks should've gotten beaten with the way they played. The Rangers beat them in every catergory and were the hungrier team. The Yankee bats never woke up and none of them developed some kind of streak to get things going. Then Tex got hurt and that's when their backs were were up against the wall.

But yeah they're still better than the Sox or the Tigers.
lvmez 5:09 PM - 23 October, 2010
tigers: wins 81 loses 81 .500 team

yankees: wins 95 loses 67 .586 team
DJ CISC0 5:47 PM - 23 October, 2010
It'll be a little different next year when Lee is in pinstripes.
DVDjHardy 7:51 PM - 23 October, 2010
Yankees suck!
lvmez 9:26 PM - 23 October, 2010
we don't need Lee to come a head of tigers.
djlj 9:27 PM - 23 October, 2010
He could've helped in 2006.
DJ CISC0 10:18 PM - 23 October, 2010
Quote:
we don't need Lee to come a head of tigers.

Lol. Good point. Hardy is just mad that his Tigers suck.
DJ CISC0 10:24 PM - 23 October, 2010
Quote:
He could've helped in 2006.

lol..jokes huh!
djlj 10:27 PM - 23 October, 2010
Sorry! Saying I'm a Tigers fan would be a bit of an understatement. ;)

The Yankees/Rangers series was great, and I'm sure the Yankees will be back at it again next year. Just don't get in the way of the boys from the D!
DJ CISC0 10:32 PM - 23 October, 2010
Quote:
Sorry! Saying I'm a Tigers fan would be a bit of an understatement. ;)

The Yankees/Rangers series was great, and I'm sure the Yankees will be back at it again next year. Just don't get in the way of the boys from the D!


Nice bio dude...respect for that...But the truth of the matter is the Tigers are not up to par with the Yankees...Lets not even get into the Lions :P
djlj 10:42 PM - 23 October, 2010
When my Lions win the Super Bowl, EVERYONE will cheer!
DJ CISC0 10:53 PM - 23 October, 2010
Quote:
When my Lions win the Super Bowl, EVERYONE will cheer!
Wishful thinking...nothing wrong with that.
DVDjHardy 5:11 PM - 24 October, 2010
Yankees suck!
djlj 5:20 PM - 24 October, 2010
Quote:
Yankees suck!


Add me back on Twitter, Hardy! You gotta let me know when you go to games next season.
DVDjHardy 5:32 PM - 24 October, 2010
Quote:
Quote:
Yankees suck!


Add me back on Twitter, Hardy! You gotta let me know when you go to games next season.


For sure man. What's your twitter username?
djlj 5:34 PM - 24 October, 2010
djleejdetroit
DJ CISC0 9:19 PM - 3 November, 2010
Oh damn...Talks on Jeter and Mo possibly being traded have already begun. Hal better make the right moves or else he'll be hated in NY. I can't see them trading either of them for Lee but that's just me.
djlj 12:33 AM - 4 November, 2010
We'll take Jeter here in Detroit kk thx
lvmez 1:33 AM - 4 November, 2010
you need more than Jeter in Detroit.

They are both staying. Just a little drama before they sign.
DJ CISC0 1:54 AM - 4 November, 2010
Quote:
We'll take Jeter here in Detroit kk thx
Right, for your whole infield...lol
djlj 2:02 AM - 4 November, 2010
Cabrera ain't goin' anywhere. :)
DJ CISC0 2:33 AM - 4 November, 2010
Quote:
Cabrera ain't goin' anywhere. :)
Yanks don't need anymore drama..so the Tigers can keep him.
djlj 2:43 AM - 4 November, 2010
Drama? The guy had one incident that, while unfortunate, ultimately wasn't a huge deal.
DJ CISC0 2:59 AM - 4 November, 2010
Quote:
ultimately wasn't a huge deal.

Huh? Wasn't he drunk, got into a bar fight, went home and got into a domestic dispute with his wife(with physical injuries)? Also, got arrested in the mix? He went like 0-5 WRISP the following game I think....I could be wrong.
djlj 3:17 AM - 4 November, 2010
Drunk - Apparently so.
Bar fight - Heard nothing about that.
Domestic dispute - That's why the cops were called.

While he didn't have the best series at the end of that season, his performance to that point helped the team get to that point in the first place. :)
DVDjHardy 3:20 AM - 4 November, 2010
Are the Yankees bring up old news? LOL

2006.
DJ CISC0 3:32 AM - 4 November, 2010
Didn't he talk smack to a some teen in a bar saying something like he was overweight and needed to work out? Then a fight broke out...Again, maybe I'm wrong but whatever...

What happened in 2006?
djlj 3:33 AM - 4 November, 2010
2006 - Tigers beat the Yankees 3-1 in the ALDS. One of the most amazing nights at Comerica Park EV-AR!!!
DJ CISC0 3:38 AM - 4 November, 2010
Quote:
2006 - Tigers beat the Yankees 3-1 in the ALDS. One of the most amazing nights at Comerica Park EV-AR!!!

Don't know what you're talking about bro.
djlj 3:41 AM - 4 November, 2010
DJ CISC0 3:46 AM - 4 November, 2010
Oh OK got you now. That was the year the Tigers lost to the Cards right? A wise man once told me "second place are the first losers"...lol
DJ CISC0 3:47 AM - 4 November, 2010
Ya'll still stuck on the Kirk Gibson/Sparky days.
lvmez 1:36 PM - 4 November, 2010
looks like sparky isn't doing well. i heard he is in hospice care.
djlj 3:22 PM - 4 November, 2010
Quote:
looks like sparky isn't doing well. i heard he is in hospice care.


I just saw that article too. :( Sad news.
DJ CISC0 3:43 AM - 5 November, 2010
Oh man...R.I.P Sparky

I didn't even know he was sick and in the hospital.
lvmez 2:37 PM - 8 November, 2010
looks like are going to over pay for Lee. also looks they are out of running for crawford. i really wanted them to get crawford. they neeed to get younger.
DJ CISC0 9:02 PM - 8 November, 2010
They can still land Crawford...And I don't know about giving Lee more than 3-4 years at 25mil/year. Yeah he did great against the Yanks but sucked against the Giants so.
lvmez 12:59 AM - 9 November, 2010
Lee is looking for 5-6 years from yankees for about 22-23 million a year. they will not pursue crawford unless Lee takes Texas offer.
djlj 6:30 AM - 9 November, 2010
That's super sick money for a pitcher. Especially in the current economy.
DJ CISC0 10:24 PM - 9 November, 2010
I just think the Yankees need to slow down on throwing around 5-6 year deals every year...Lee is 32 right?...so I don't know. Don't get me wrong...adding Lee will boost the pitching staff like crazy.

On a side note: Tex, Jeter, and Cano all got Gold Gloves...haters take it for what it's worth.

www.nydailynews.com
dj lad 10:35 PM - 9 November, 2010
THE WORST DEFENSIVE SHORTSTOP IN THE AMERICAN LEAGUE JUST GOT A GOLD GLOVE.

www.baseball-reference.com

THE WORST.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again: the Gold Glove award is the absolute WORST award in professional sports. There is simply NO WAY to spin that Jeter is in the top 10 of defensive shortstops in the AL. Never mind the top 5. Or best.

Never mind that Robinson Cano isn't any better than AVERAGE at best.

www.baseball-reference.com

It's comically dumb.

On the other hand, if it forces the Yankees to pay Jeter another $3M a year... keep giving awful defensive shortstops meaningless awards!
dj lad 10:40 PM - 9 November, 2010
Ironically, Brett Gardner probably should have won an award for his fielding. Was a TERRIFIC fielder.

The best part of this?

www.baseball-reference.com

Look at the note next to Jeter on their award list.

"We can't believe it either."

Only the dumbest, most brain-dead, homer-loving person would actually defend Jeter's Gold Glove.

So.... surely someone on this forum will actually try! (And fail, because there's simply no argument to be made).
lvmez 10:58 PM - 9 November, 2010
so your saying every one of these guys deserved it too?

1957: Frank Malzone (3b) [one major league selected]
1958: Frank Malzone (3b) [2] - Jim Piersall (cf)
1959: Frank Malzone (3b) [3] - Jackie Jensen (rf)
1963: George Scott (1b) - Carl Yastrzemski (lf)
1965: George Scott (1b) [2] - Carl Yastrzemski (lf)
1968: George Scott (1b) [3] - Reggie Smith (of) - Carl Yastrzemski (of)
1969: Carl Yastrzemski (of)
1971: George Scott (1b) [4] - Carl Yastrzemski (of)
1972: Carlton Fisk (c) - Doug Griffin (2b)
1975: Fred Lynn (of)
1976: Dwight Evans (of) - Cal Yastrzemski (of)
1977: Carl Yastrzemski (of)
1978: Dwight Evans (of) - Fred Lynn (of) [2]
1979: Rick Burleson (ss) - Dwight Evans (of) - Fred Lynn (of) [3]
1980: Fred Lynn (of) [4]
1981: Dwight Evans (of)
1982: Dwight Evans (of)
1983: Dwight Evans (of)
1984: Dwight Evans (of)
1985: Dwight Evans (of)
1990: Mike Boddicker (p) - Ellis Burks (of)
1991: Tony Peña (c)
2005: Jason Varitek (c)
2007: Kevin Youkilis (1b)
2008: Dustin Pedroia (2b)

or are you upset because of this:

"Despite the defense-first approach of the Red Sox this year, they came up empty-handed in the awards. This isn't necessarily surprising given the injuries suffered by players like Kevin Youkilis and Dustin Pedroia. Adrian Beltre was by far the Red Sox' best chance for an award, but he lost to Evan Longoria, likely thanks to the 19 errors he accrued over the course of the season. As a whole, his defense was certainly elite"
uno seis 11:07 PM - 9 November, 2010
You don't have to be a Red Sox lover/Yankee hater to know how dumb Jeter's 2010 Gold Glove award is...
dj lad 1:26 AM - 10 November, 2010
Quote:
so your saying every one of these guys deserved it too?

1957: Frank Malzone (3b) [one major league selected]
1958: Frank Malzone (3b) [2] - Jim Piersall (cf)
1959: Frank Malzone (3b) [3] - Jackie Jensen (rf)
1963: George Scott (1b) - Carl Yastrzemski (lf)
1965: George Scott (1b) [2] - Carl Yastrzemski (lf)
1968: George Scott (1b) [3] - Reggie Smith (of) - Carl Yastrzemski (of)
1969: Carl Yastrzemski (of)
1971: George Scott (1b) [4] - Carl Yastrzemski (of)
1972: Carlton Fisk (c) - Doug Griffin (2b)
1975: Fred Lynn (of)
1976: Dwight Evans (of) - Cal Yastrzemski (of)
1977: Carl Yastrzemski (of)
1978: Dwight Evans (of) - Fred Lynn (of) [2]
1979: Rick Burleson (ss) - Dwight Evans (of) - Fred Lynn (of) [3]
1980: Fred Lynn (of) [4]
1981: Dwight Evans (of)
1982: Dwight Evans (of)
1983: Dwight Evans (of)
1984: Dwight Evans (of)
1985: Dwight Evans (of)
1990: Mike Boddicker (p) - Ellis Burks (of)
1991: Tony Peña (c)
2005: Jason Varitek (c)
2007: Kevin Youkilis (1b)
2008: Dustin Pedroia (2b)

or are you upset because of this:

"Despite the defense-first approach of the Red Sox this year, they came up empty-handed in the awards. This isn't necessarily surprising given the injuries suffered by players like Kevin Youkilis and Dustin Pedroia. Adrian Beltre was by far the Red Sox' best chance for an award, but he lost to Evan Longoria, likely thanks to the 19 errors he accrued over the course of the season. As a whole, his defense was certainly elite"

You're must be an idiot because you completely missed my point.

I absolutely believe that MANY of those Gold Glove awards given to Red Sox players were probably wrong -- as recently as 2005, when Varitek won it that was stupid (Youkilis has actual arguments for being the best defenders at his position; Pedroia was a perfect case of what I explain next). As I said: it's a STUPID award because a majority of the time it isn't given to the best defender but the most well-known player who at one point in their career has played "okay" defense. It's a reputation award, not based in reality. Pedroia was a great case: good (above average defender) who won the Gold Glove because he had a tremendous offensive year for a playoff team. Mark Ellis has probably been the best defensive second baseman over the last four years, and he'll never sniff the award because his OPS over that time was .734.

I don't give a flying fuck about the 2010 Red Sox players not getting awards for defense because the award itself is meaningless when players like Jeter get FIVE of them (and as Rob Neyer said, he didn't deserve at least four of them). Raffy Palmiero won a Gold Glove at first when he played 28 games at first. Doesn't that SCREAM that the award has lost its meaning? Or was it when someone who has been universally called an awful (at-worst) to average (at-best) shortstop by anyone with a functioning brain had been given FIVE awards for being the "best defensive shortstop in his league"? I mean, you can't possibly think that he was the best defensive shortstop in the American League five times in his career, on the wrong side of 30, while every single advanced fielding metric suggests otherwise, right?

My point wasn't "BOO JETER" it was "BOO THIS STUPID AWARD". Those are two entirely different concepts. Try to pick them apart.
djlj 3:10 AM - 10 November, 2010
Oh snap I'm seeing better baseball discussion in a DJ forum than I do on most sports forums. I'm lovin' it.
lvmez 3:21 AM - 10 November, 2010
point
Quote:
I've said it before, and I'll say it again: the Gold Glove award is the absolute WORST award in professional sports.


it's the worst award when a yankee wins it, right? there is always going to be someone who doesn't deserve it, but that's baseball.
slimmjimm 3:51 AM - 10 November, 2010
Cano and Tex sure, but Jeter? I just hope he gets out of his sump come spring training.
dj lad 5:32 AM - 10 November, 2010
Quote:
point
Quote:


I've said it before, and I'll say it again: the Gold Glove award is the absolute WORST award in professional sports.


it's the worst award when a yankee wins it, right? there is always going to be someone who doesn't deserve it, but that's baseball.

You can't fucking think I believe this, right?

I mean, you didn't notice that bit about Palmeiro? That is the GOLD STANDARD of awful awards.

Here's the problem: "there is always going to be someone who doesn't deserve it" -- that might be one of the saddest things I've read about sports: "well, we all know that we shouldn't strive to make sure the people who deserve to win awards win them". That's pathetic.

The Gold Glove awards actually got a few right this year: Buerhle, Suzuki, Longonia, and Gutierrez all probably deserved their awards this year; even Teixeira wasn't an awful choice, maybe not the best, but defensible. That's basically 4.5 of 9. 50%. That's really awful. Why not actually GET THE AWARD right? It's the only award in professional sports that gets the winner wrong (in such a bad way, too, like giving it to Jeter, Cano and Crawford) at an AWFUL rate consistently -- even when the MVP award doesn't go the guy who deserved it, it usually goes to a top 3 guy you can make a legitimate argument for. That's quite often not true for the Gold Glove (the Cy Young award almost always seems to go to the right guy).
lvmez 12:47 PM - 10 November, 2010
"there is always going to be someone who doesn't deserve it"

i didn't it was right, i meant that when you leave it to the writers, it's all about favortism. if a player treats the media bad, the media will not vote for thet player. and that applies for other awards in baseball as well.
lvmez 12:48 PM - 10 November, 2010
just curious, who do you think deserves the cy young in the american league?
DJ CISC0 4:47 PM - 10 November, 2010
LOL @ Lad the Rainman of baseball stats...I'll make it quick cause Im busy today and we beat this horse to death in the past but....


Though I too was surprised that Jeter got a GG I wouldn't call him the worst in the game especially after looking at that link you provided. A few things to consider when looking at those stats:

1.You also have 50 players on that list that played 100 or less games. 32 that played less than 20 games! So I don't think that's a fair assessment at all.

2. Those stats do not reflect key/klutch games or plays either.

I told you before when your stats were wrong about Cano and CC.....that stats can and WILL drive you crazy and delusional depending and how you want to twist them.

It's funny how you don’t give a shit about the 2010 Sox all of a sudden but when the season started you projected them the win the WS...lol...its still all good buddy.

Bottom line that no one can debate on...If you Google the top 5 Shortstops of all time 9/10 times Jeter comes in top 5. Usually right behind Ripken.
djlj 5:12 PM - 10 November, 2010
Gold Glove is a popularity contest, not a true metric of who was the (notice the quotation marks) "best player" at the respective positions.

/thread

:P
dj lad 8:37 PM - 10 November, 2010
Quote:
"there is always going to be someone who doesn't deserve it"

i didn't it was right, i meant that when you leave it to the writers, it's all about favortism. if a player treats the media bad, the media will not vote for thet player. and that applies for other awards in baseball as well.

Gold Glove isn't voted on by writers. It's voted on by managers and coaches (who cannot vote for their own players). So at the MOST, they're seeing the players they are voting on 18 times a year, plus what they see on TV.

Ergo: large market players and big name players get more attention. It's worse than the all-star game voting.
dj lad 8:47 PM - 10 November, 2010
Quote:
just curious, who do you think deserves the cy young in the american league?

My ballot:

1. Felix Hernandez
2. CC Sabathia
3. Clay Buchholz
4. David Price
5. Jered Weaver

Wouldn't normally give a Cy Young to a guy on a team that lost 101 games, but his numbers are STAGGERING. Remember, the Cy Young award isn't for "Best Pitcher on The Best Team", it's the "Best Pitcher Award", and King Felix was INCREDIBLE this year. Led the league in IP, ERA, H/9, and had 232 K's. Sabathia had a nice season, but his ERA was in the 3's. The big value he provided was the 237.2 IP and high strikeout rate. If Buchholz had been able to get to 200 innings, he would have passed Sabathia (a 2.33 ERA gets you that).
dj lad 8:48 PM - 10 November, 2010
That said, I suspect that Sabathia will win because he had 21 wins on a team that made the playoffs. It will be a small victory for intelligence if King Felix wins the award (his 13 wins on a 61-win team is pretty remarkable. If he was given the run support of Sabathia, he probably would have won 24-25 games.)
dj lad 9:10 PM - 10 November, 2010
Quote:
LOL @ Lad the Rainman of baseball stats...I'll make it quick cause Im busy today and we beat this horse to death in the past but....


Though I too was surprised that Jeter got a GG I wouldn't call him the worst in the game especially after looking at that link you provided. A few things to consider when looking at those stats:

1.You also have 50 players on that list that played 100 or less games. 32 that played less than 20 games! So I don't think that's a fair assessment at all.

So? Even with that Jeter still finishes dead last. Look at the 18 guys who played in 100 games and Jeter's still the bottom of the barrel. Not quite sure of your point... "Well, sure, he's 50th of 50 if you include everyone... but if you don't he's only 18th of 18!" Not exactly a winning argument here.

Quote:
2. Those stats do not reflect key/klutch games or plays either.

Really? That's your argument? Actually, there's a stat called "Fielding WPA" which does exactly this. It ranks Jeter at 6th of the 10 qualified SSs in the AL, with a -4.7 rating (Scutaro, Betancourt and Bartlett were the only ones worse).

Quote:
I told you before when your stats were wrong about Cano and CC.....that stats can and WILL drive you crazy and delusional depending and how you want to twist them.

I said, long ago, that CC's body type would have trouble holding up over the life of his contract -- he's in year 2. I'd be STUNNED if he didn't have some sort of major injury eventually considering his weight. As for Cano, he had an incredible 2010, no doubt about that. But he's still a free swinger who doesn't draw a lot of walks. And I'm hardly the only one who thought all of this.

Quote:
It's funny how you don’t give a shit about the 2010 Sox all of a sudden but when the season started you projected them the win the WS...lol...its still all good buddy.

What does this have to do with anything? Yes, I projected them to win the WS -- they still won 89 games in the toughest division in baseball (and were probably the 3rd best regular season team in the game) despite having MASSIVE injury problems (Ellsbury, Pedroia, Youkilis, Okajima, Lowell, Cameron, Varitek, Martinez, Matsuzaka, Beckett, and Buchholz). Take away, let's say: Gardner, Cano, Teixeira, Swisher, Posada, Cervelli, Burnett, Vazquez and Hughes for HUGE portions of the season and let's see how the Yankees would do.

If Pedroia and Youkilis don't get hurt, there's a good chance those two alone make up the win difference between 2nd and 3rd place, and that's not hyperbole.

Quote:
Bottom line that no one can debate on...If you Google the top 5 Shortstops of all time 9/10 times Jeter comes in top 5. Usually right behind Ripken.

He's probably 6th right now, behind Wagner, Alex Rodriguez (who has played 280 more games as a SS than a 3B), Ripken, Yount, and Arky Vaughan. He's had a tremendous offensive career as a shortstop, no denying that.
DJ CISC0 7:06 PM - 15 November, 2010
Quote:

Quote:
2. Those stats do not reflect key/klutch games or plays either.

Really? That's your argument? Actually, there's a stat called "Fielding WPA" which does exactly this. It ranks Jeter at 6th of the 10 qualified SSs in the AL, with a -4.7 rating (Scutaro, Betancourt and Bartlett were the only ones worse).

This was the point I was trying to make...so I guess he's not the worst when it comes to being klutch. And who cares who was worse?
dj lad 8:18 PM - 16 November, 2010
You do realize that -4.7 is a REALLY BAD defensive WPA, right? It means when it was important, he played poorly.

So yes, he's awful defensively. There is, as I said, no argument to make for him deserving a 5th (not to mention, 1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th) Gold Glove.
dj lad 7:02 PM - 18 November, 2010
KIIIING FELIX!

Thank GAWD that happened. Fatboy finished 3rd.
dj lad 7:07 PM - 18 November, 2010
Official results:
1. Felix
2. Price
3. Sabathia
4. Lester
5. Weaver

Had 4 of the 5 guys. Still think Buchholz had a better year than Lester, but whatever, Lester had 19 wins and 225 Ks.
slimmjimm 9:43 PM - 18 November, 2010
King Felix def deserved it, he was a monster. Shame the M's won't get to win something for him in a while, they really screwed the pooch this year.
lvmez 2:33 AM - 19 November, 2010
i'll take the 21 wins and making the playoffs over the cy young.
djlj 5:15 AM - 19 November, 2010
Quote:
i'll take the 21 wins and making the playoffs over the cy young.


Does a less-than-deserved Gold Glove at SS ease the pain? ;)
dj lad 6:37 AM - 19 November, 2010
Quote:
i'll take the 21 wins and making the playoffs over the cy young.

You DO realize that wins for a pitcher mean basically nothing, right?

All they do is signify the amount of runs a team scored and how a bullpen did (most of the time) compared to how a pitcher did.
uno seis 6:45 AM - 19 November, 2010
Quote:
i'll take the 21 wins and making the playoffs over the cy young.

i don't think anyone on earth would take a cy young award over a playoff appearance haha
lvmez 12:49 PM - 19 November, 2010
Quote:
Quote:

i'll take the 21 wins and making the playoffs over the cy young.

You DO realize that wins for a pitcher mean basically nothing, right?

All they do is signify the amount of runs a team scored and how a bullpen did (most of the time) compared to how a pitcher did.


you do realize that he pitches in the toughest division in baseball. He pitches in a smaller ball park than Felix. bro, your just a yankee hater. the bottom line is that you have sore feeling that boston didn't make the playoffs. get over it. you have next season to look forward to. go get some warm milk and a box of tissues.
uno seis 5:41 PM - 19 November, 2010
^you are actually making lad's case even stronger that the "old school" stats like wins and ERA are dumb. ballpark size and division toughness are accounted for in the newer sabrmetric nerd stats and that is why we like them.

whether or not lad is pissed off that the sox didn't make the playoffs is another story haha
dj lad 8:47 AM - 20 November, 2010
Quote:
Quote:


Quote:



i'll take the 21 wins and making the playoffs over the cy young.

You DO realize that wins for a pitcher mean basically nothing, right?

All they do is signify the amount of runs a team scored and how a bullpen did (most of the time) compared to how a pitcher did.


you do realize that he pitches in the toughest division in baseball. He pitches in a smaller ball park than Felix. bro, your just a yankee hater. the bottom line is that you have sore feeling that boston didn't make the playoffs. get over it. you have next season to look forward to. go get some warm milk and a box of tissues.

You're a fucking idiot. Sorry to use profanity, but you are.

There is simply NO measurement of quality of a pitcher that shows that Sabathia outpitched Hernandez. NONE. Your examples are fucking AWFUL. ERA+, which compensates for the park effects, had Felix at 174. That's 74% better than league average for the season. Sabathia's was 134. To give you a comparison, that's the same difference between Sabathia and Freddy Garcia.

But that's not enough for you, is it?

WAR, which will calculate the value of a player over a league average replacement, had Felix at 6.2, good for 3rd in the league. CC was at 5.1.

I can keep on whipping your ass at actual intelligent baseball discussion, or I can stoop to your level:

"You just sound like a bitter fucking Yankee fan who knows that his $200M team got their asses beat down like the bitches they are against Texas because despite spending more money than 99.999% teams in baseball history, the Yankees couldn't buy themselves a bullpen. Or a 3rd starter. Or, shit, a 2nd starter. At least the Red Sox didn't make the playoffs because their injuries were comically historically bad. The Yankees lost to a team that spent, what, 30% of what they did?"

That argument I just made is stupid. And that's because it's the kind of argument that you would make. I'm not bitter about the Red Sox whatsoever -- the season was lost in June. That's fine.

Now go get your fuckin shinebox.
DVDjHardy 9:04 AM - 20 November, 2010
^Epic ownage of lvidiotmez. Just like the Rangers owned the Yankees this year.
lvmez 3:44 PM - 20 November, 2010
Quote:
^Epic ownage of lvidiotmez. Just like the Rangers owned the Yankees this year.

now your jumping on the rangers band wagon. NOW THATS A STRAIGHT LOSER. anyone who jumps ship on there team is a LOSER. all your predictions were right on hardy. i hope your not a gambling man.

lad, CC came in third in cy young voting and your still busting on him?????????? he had 21 wins. you need to get a life. please go to your redsox thread, oh thats right, they didn't make playoffs so you need to come over here to make your point.

it seams like you spend a lot of alone time with your computer at night. you must be a big fantasy baseball guy. go out and get some fresh air.
djlj 5:37 PM - 20 November, 2010
I love this thread lol
dj lad 8:26 PM - 20 November, 2010
Quote:
Quote:


^Epic ownage of lvidiotmez. Just like the Rangers owned the Yankees this year.

now your jumping on the rangers band wagon. NOW THATS A STRAIGHT LOSER. anyone who jumps ship on there team is a LOSER. all your predictions were right on hardy. i hope your not a gambling man.

lad, CC came in third in cy young voting and your still busting on him?????????? he had 21 wins. you need to get a life. please go to your redsox thread, oh thats right, they didn't make playoffs so you need to come over here to make your point.

it seams like you spend a lot of alone time with your computer at night. you must be a big fantasy baseball guy. go out and get some fresh air.

I posted at like 5 AM, after I got back from my gig. Didn't realize that I was spending "a lot of alone time with my computer at night". Huh.

How am I busting on Sabathia? I predicted he'd finish 2nd in the Cy Young voting IN THIS thread! Yes, I called him Fatboy, but that's because he's, well, fat. The fact that I was saying that someone is a better pitcher doesn't make what I'm saying an insult to Sabathia, but because your skin is SO thin about the Yankees, you take everything that isn't SHINING AND REALLY NICE about the Yankees as a perceived insult. It's not. Try to use your eighty-seven braincells and understand this.

And your use of the English language is pretty garbage. "'Your jumping'.... 'your not'.... 'there team'.... 'they didn't make playoffs'...." Nice one.
DJ CISC0 9:15 PM - 20 November, 2010
Uhhh...WTF happened in here? lol.

I stopped these long ongoing debates with lad a long time ago because I basically came down to this conclusion.
Quote:
bro, your just a yankee hater.
dj lad 9:33 PM - 20 November, 2010
Of course I am.

Doesn't mean that I can't have a rational discussion about sports, though. I'm presenting legitimate facts, numbers, and information here. I'm not making things up.
lvmez 2:45 AM - 21 November, 2010
rational???
dj lad 3:16 AM - 21 November, 2010
Absolutely.

I'm presenting actual arguments. You're presenting.... wins.

That's being rational.

If you want an 'irrational' argument, just keep doing the "UR JUST MAD BECUZ TEH SUX DIDNT MAKE THE PLAYOFFFFSS!!", because that's irrational.
lvmez 3:27 AM - 21 November, 2010
all your arguements are based on plagiarism. thank god you have google. do you have anything to write that comes from your own thoughts that you haven't read somewhere online. you must be a real douche to watch a baseball game with. instead of enjoying a game, your worrying about stats.
djlj 6:45 AM - 21 November, 2010
*popcorn*
dj lad 5:33 PM - 21 November, 2010
Quote:
all your arguements are based on plagiarism. thank god you have google. do you have anything to write that comes from your own thoughts that you haven't read somewhere online. you must be a real douche to watch a baseball game with. instead of enjoying a game, your worrying about stats.

What the fuck are you talking about? Just shut up.

My "arguements" are not based on plagiarism. They're based on going to, I dunno, ONE website and looking up a stat (fangraphs.com in this case). I didn't realize that looking up statistical information was considering plagiarism. In the future, I'll be sure to keep track of all the numbers myself over the course of the year in order to not plagiarize the stats of a website.

As for my thoughts on baseball, I'd LOVE for you find where I was plagiarizing from. Seriously. If you can find a place on the web where I copied my thoughts from, via google, I'll buy you some Yankees tickets. If you can't, you have to buy me Red Sox tickets. Sound fair? We can raise the stakes to whatever you'd like: because I know for a fact I've never stolen a word from someone and purported it to be mine.

I already know your defense, too: "Oh, well you probably just read it on ESPN or something and then just took it and rewrote it like it was your own." I'd just say that different people can come up with the same thoughts about pretty fucking obvious things: CC Sabathia wasn't the best pitcher in the American League and Derek Jeter doesn't deserve a Gold Glove. I didn't realize that Rob Neyer had the rights to be the only one to think that. So, again, find where I plagiarized my thoughts from (which reminds me, I'm not sure you know what the word plagiarize actually means, because having similar thoughts to other people isn't plagiarism; but I guess I can't be surprised since you don't seem to know the difference between "your" and "you're"), and I'll buy you Yankee tickets. If you can't, you have to buy me Red Sox tickets.d

See, unlike you, I have the ability to actually create and formulate an argument based on the numbers, facts, and information that is presented. I'm not sure you can, though.

As for the last two lines, I don't know what to tell you. I didn't realize that having a deeper understanding of the game (and therefore making the game more enjoyable) made someone a douche to watch a game with. Ignorance is bliss to you, I suppose.
lvmez 10:13 PM - 21 November, 2010
seems like I struck a cord. just like I thought. be original. come up with your own thoughts. stop typing everyone eles thoughts.
DJ CISC0 10:35 PM - 21 November, 2010
Interesting quote from Jeter's agent Casey Close :

"There's a reason the Yankees themselves have stated Derek Jeter is their modern-day Babe Ruth," Close said. "Derek's significance to the team is much more than just stats. And yet, the Yankees' negotiating strategy remains baffling."
dj lad 11:17 PM - 21 November, 2010
lvmez, you're just dumb. I'll move on, because it's pointless arguing with people who are just trolling. Hugs and handpounds.
DVDjHardy 12:32 AM - 22 November, 2010
Quote:
now your jumping on the rangers band wagon. NOW THATS A STRAIGHT LOSER. anyone who jumps ship on there team is a LOSER. all your predictions were right on hardy. i hope your not a gambling man.


i25.tinypic.com
lvmez 1:50 AM - 22 November, 2010
Quote:
Interesting quote from Jeter's agent Casey Close :

"There's a reason the Yankees themselves have stated Derek Jeter is their modern-day Babe Ruth," Close said. "Derek's significance to the team is much more than just stats. And yet, the Yankees' negotiating strategy remains baffling."


3 years 45 million isn't a bad starting point. 3 years 53 million sounds fair (even that's too much).

Quote:
lvmez, you're just dumb.


after all the endless nights you spend in this thread writing paragraphs about a team you hate, that's how you end it? WOW! grow up.
dj lad 6:03 AM - 22 November, 2010
So, are you going to accept my bet? Or are you a pussy and a liar?
lvmez 12:38 PM - 22 November, 2010
i don't need your yankee tickets, i have access to any game. the more upset you get, the more you become an internet tough guy. lol.
DVDjHardy 2:03 PM - 22 November, 2010
Pussy and a liar it is. Typical Yankees fan.
lvmez 3:17 PM - 22 November, 2010
ok ranger fan. lol. or did it change this week?
DJ CISC0 4:36 PM - 22 November, 2010
Quote:
Hugs and hardpounds.

Whoa...totally off topic.
DJ CISC0 4:37 PM - 22 November, 2010
Quote:
ok ranger fan. lol. or did it change this week?

Hardy is a fan of whatever team is playing against the Yankees so yes, it changes every week lol.
dj lad 5:12 PM - 22 November, 2010
Quote:
i don't need your yankee tickets, i have access to any game. the more upset you get, the more you become an internet tough guy. lol.

Name your terms then. $100 then. $500. $1000. I don't care.

You called me a plagiarist. I don't like that -- if you're so sure that I am stealing my arguments from somewhere else, then you should be able to prove it. Otherwise, shut up.

As for the "internet tough guy" line, aren't you the one going around and accusing people of intellectual property theft instead of actually coming up with a counter argument, as a way to be tough? That's what I thought.
dj lad 5:20 PM - 22 November, 2010
I mean it, too: name your terms. A 57 or 68. A new set of Techs. Your laptop vs my laptop.

Put up or shut up.
lvmez 7:31 PM - 22 November, 2010
Quote:
I mean it, too


what are you 12? hold on let me get my nephew to meet you at the playground. the truth must have hurt. get over it.
lvmez 7:33 PM - 22 November, 2010
Quote:
As for the "internet tough guy" line, aren't you the one going around and accusing people of intellectual property theft instead of actually coming up with a counter argument, as a way to be tough? That's what I thought.


calling someone a pussy? you wouldn't say that in person to someone and not expect to get punched in the face, BUT since your online in your dark little room while your mom prepares your warm milk, you can act tough.
djlj 7:51 PM - 22 November, 2010
what happened to this being a baseball thread? :-\
lvmez 8:14 PM - 22 November, 2010
Quote:
what happened to this being a baseball thread? :-\


your right. back to baseball.
DJ CISC0 8:18 PM - 22 November, 2010
Agree!...forget all that BS talk.

Back to Jeter's gold glove...lol.
djlj 9:23 PM - 22 November, 2010
What do you all think of them potentially expanding the playoffs?
dj lad 11:00 PM - 22 November, 2010
Quote:
Quote:


As for the "internet tough guy" line, aren't you the one going around and accusing people of intellectual property theft instead of actually coming up with a counter argument, as a way to be tough? That's what I thought.


calling someone a pussy? you wouldn't say that in person to someone and not expect to get punched in the face, BUT since your online in your dark little room while your mom prepares your warm milk, you can act tough.

I love that I'm both a nerd who sits in my room and also a bully. Makes total sense.

Seriously, dude, you've accused me of stealing other people's ideas. I'm asking you to provide evidence that I've done it, and I've even said I'll pay you money if you do.

Since you said that I'm a thief, you should have some evidence. So, prove it, and I'll pay you. Otherwise, stop being an idiot and grow up. To quote you: "the truth must have hurt." Yes, the truth that you're full of shit and that saying I'm a thief was wrong and you had nothing to back up your shit-talking with.

I'm not an internet tough guy in any respect. There's plenty of people on this forum who know me in the "outside world" and would never think I'm that kind of person. I just don't like being a) taunted about intellectual property theft; and b) being told I'm "whining because the Red Sux lost" (which it couldn't be further from the truth. I'm calling you a pussy because you've apparently backed down from calling me a thief; if anyone is the "internet tough guy" here, it's you since you're the one trolling.

Quote:
What do you all think of them potentially expanding the playoffs?

I don't like the idea, frankly. I think the baseball season should be 154 games, have two divisions per league, have the top four overall teams make it (two division winners and the next best two records as well). Seed em up 1v4, 2v3, best record to worst record. 7 game series for each round. I don't like November baseball much. We're going to have a series where it snows some time, and that's gonna be a problem.

As for Jeter's contract... it's a weird situation. I suspect he ends up getting 4 years at $20M a year; this the team that negotiated against themselves for A-Rod and Sabathia and overpaid both by a healthy margin. They also don't have another option at short that will make the fan base happy (although I have to say the idea of signing Beltre to play 3B and moving A-Rod back to short would make me laugh, although it would be a pretty smart idea supposing A-Rod could still play the position). The only way Jeter leaves NY is if he gets a 4 or 5 year offer elsewhere; but I'm not sure he gets that from anyone but the Yanks.
djlj 11:13 PM - 22 November, 2010
I wouldn't mind expansion of the playoffs if the regular season were somehow shortened to compensate for it. I don't have a problem with the eight team model they have now, but I can see the allure of having four teams and eliminating the wild card shenanigans.
lvmez 11:20 PM - 22 November, 2010
lad, your long winded arguements are boring and repetative. your a child.
dj lad 11:24 PM - 22 November, 2010
"arguements". "your a child".

Right.
dj lad 11:30 PM - 22 November, 2010
Quote:
I wouldn't mind expansion of the playoffs if the regular season were somehow shortened to compensate for it. I don't have a problem with the eight team model they have now, but I can see the allure of having four teams and eliminating the wild card shenanigans.

Well, like I said, I don't mind the 8 team model now -- but I do think the divisional set up is bad. I don't like the unbalanced schedule or even interleague. Play 11 or 12 games against every team in your league. Make it as balanced as possible. No interleague, except MAYBE have only the big ones happen, with 1 series a year (Yankees-Mets, Cubs-White Sox, Giants-A's, Angels-Dodgers). Keep it simple. I'm also not a fan of 5-game playoff series; too much can happen in a short series that let a bad team move on.
DVDjHardy 3:29 AM - 23 November, 2010
^100% disagree about inter-league play. It's always more exciting to see a wider variety of competition in my opinion. I'm sick of watching the Tigers play KC and Cleveland so much. I guess it's a different view if you're always watching in AL East, which is just ridiculously stacked and more fun to watch than other divisions.

As for the playoffs, I think they'll expand to more teams in the near future. Baseball is the only major team sport left with just 8 teams competing in the playoffs. I personally like it the way it is right now. And I would prefer a full 7-game series in the first round too.

But when it comes down to it, it's all about money and the easiest way to increase their revenue is by having more ticket sales, TV time, etc. MLB won't care if it jeopardizes historic records, because they also kept their mouth shut about steroids and cheaters (like A-Rod, Clemens, Petite, Giambi, etc.) until the government stepped in and forced their hand.
lvmez 12:37 PM - 23 November, 2010
Quote:
(like A-Rod, Clemens, Petite, Giambi, Mark Carreon, Hal Morris, Phil Hiatt, Fernando Vina, Nook Logan, Juan Gonzalez and Gary Sheffield


and let's just add Magglio Ordonez and pudge while we are at it.
DVDjHardy 1:33 PM - 23 November, 2010
Quote:
Quote:

(like A-Rod, Clemens, Petite, Giambi, Mark Carreon, Hal Morris, Phil Hiatt, Fernando Vina, Nook Logan, Juan Gonzalez and Gary Sheffield


and let's just add Magglio Ordonez and pudge while we are at it.


2006 son.
lvmez 2:12 PM - 23 November, 2010
Arod, 2003 SON!
lvmez 6:47 PM - 23 November, 2010
4 year deal for Victor Martinez with tigers. Very good pick up.
DVDjHardy 7:04 PM - 23 November, 2010
Quote:
4 year deal for Victor Martinez with tigers. Very good pick up.


Desperately needed bat for us. Not a very good defensive catcher, but if he handles the pitching staff OK, I will trade a couple of stolen bases in return for that.
DVDjHardy 7:27 PM - 23 November, 2010
Looks like Hamilton won the MVP. Cabrera second...can't be mad at that.
DJ CISC0 7:50 PM - 23 November, 2010
Quote:
Looks like Hamilton won the MVP. Cabrera second...can't be mad at that.
Yeah, and Cano third.

I can't believe the Red Sox let Martinez slip away for 8 million dollars. Something doesn't sound right there. I'm thinking he just didn't like playing for them and wanted out.
lvmez 8:25 PM - 23 November, 2010
he will be a big part of offense but his defense is so bad. i think he'll be dhing a lot.
lvmez 10:10 PM - 23 November, 2010
yanks offer Lee 6 years, 140 Million.
dj lad 10:15 PM - 23 November, 2010
Yeah, I love Victor (and from what I heard from people in the know he enjoyed his time in Boston), but his defense was a liability as he went from okay at the start of the year to putrid. He's also on the wrong side of 30 and it's rare that catchers can maintain their offensive skill level (Posada is one who has).

I suspect the reason the Red Sox didn't go for that extra $8M a year is the same reason they didn't with Damon: they don't want to overpay a guy in his 3rd/4th years. He'll be a full-time DH/1B in short time (as lvmez said), which are two positions where the Sox are STACKED, even down the road (Rizzo, Anderson, Youkilis, etc).

As for the Lee offer, it's not shocking -- 23.3M a year is what I thought they'd offer (actually I thought they'd offer 25M). It's very close to what Sabathia got (23M a year) which is what I've heard Lee wants (Sabathia money). I think Texas will pony up enough to counter, so the question becomes whether or not Lee wants to stay in Texas or go to New York.
dj lad 10:17 PM - 23 November, 2010
From what I hear, the Red Sox are going to pursue Mike Napoli as a C/1B replacement for Martinez (which I'd love), as there's a chance he's going to be non-tendered (since he's due about $6.5 in arbitration and Mike Scioscia doesn't seem to like anyone who can't lay down a bunt.
dj lad 8:15 AM - 24 November, 2010
The more I think about the Jeter situation, the more I think he ends up getting something like 3/57 or something. Cashman isn't going off the 3 years, and Jeter isn't going to get CLOSE to 45 on the open market. A compromise between Jeter and the Yankees at somewhere around 3/55-60 makes both look good. The Yankees get their all-time shortstop to get his 3,000th hit in pinstripes, they don't look like suckers for caving in for 4 years, and they can still use him as the face of the franchise. Jeter gets paid, moves to a SS/DH position when he's 39, and he can retire as the "greatest Yankee since Mantle". I just don't see the Jeter or the Yankees caving on 3/45 or whatever Jeter wants (rumored at 4/80 or more, which is, frankly INSANE).
slimmjimm 1:56 PM - 24 November, 2010
I wish the Jeter situation would be over, I'm not thrilled as to the way it's all working out in the press, but you have to give the Yankees brass a bit of credit that they're not just writing blank checks, even though they are denying the players who actually deserve it (for the Jeter haters, I don't think he deserves it based upon play)

I mean, what's the most common complaint about the Yankees, they overpay players, and while they are trying to avoid that, people are still shit talking about buying the Series.
lvmez 2:16 PM - 24 November, 2010
just out of principle, Jeter is going to try and get at least 5 million more. that would be more than enough. he would still be the highest paid short stop. we need to sign mo as wel. i think he wants a one year contract. WE NEED TO GET YOUNGER! i would love crawford but it doesn't look good if we get Lee.
dj lad 9:10 AM - 28 November, 2010
I am fucking LOVING watching all these Yankee fans turning on Jeter... "his defense isn't that good anymore!" The same mouth-breathers who propped the dude up as the patron saint of all things good and holy in baseball are now tearing him down like he raped their mothers.

I've been waiting for this for so long and it's glorious.

72% of NY Post voters say Jeter is being a jerk. 72% OF NEW YORK POST READERS!!! Those are his bread and butter, the "COUNT DA RINGZZZZ" fans and they've TURNED on him!

Fucking glorious.
dj lad 9:11 AM - 28 November, 2010
The best part is this where the Yankees make their stand. Pay Burnett $20M a year? Okay. Pay Randy Johnson $16M a year for 2 of his worst seasons? Sure. Pay Kei Igawa $40M to sit in the minors? Absolutely.

All these shitty fucking contracts, and THIS, their HERO, this is where they draw the line? It's so comical. I am loving this.
lvmez 2:12 PM - 28 November, 2010
serato.com

it's quiet in there. very quiet.
dj lad 4:41 PM - 28 November, 2010
Good comeback, as per usual. You do realize that this story (the Jeter one) is THE baseball story of the offseason, right? And this is a Yankee thread, last I checked?

Ironically, it's all the Red Sox fans I know who are saying that Yankees are fucking this up, not the Yankee fans. It's bizarro world: Red Sox fans are defending Jeter vociferously.
slimmjimm 8:36 PM - 28 November, 2010
Quote:
The best part is this where the Yankees make their stand. Pay Burnett $20M a year? Okay. Pay Randy Johnson $16M a year for 2 of his worst seasons? Sure. Pay Kei Igawa $40M to sit in the minors? Absolutely.

All these shitty fucking contracts, and THIS, their HERO, this is where they draw the line? It's so comical. I am loving this.


Those shitty contracts were in a different time though, doesn't make it better, just sayin.

Should they overpay Jeter? Absofuckinglutely, but I understand them not wanting to either. Nobody is handing out huge dollar amounts like before, sure there are some boneheaded contracts, but you don't see any Joe Shmo getting 15m+/yr like years past.
lvmez 11:14 PM - 28 November, 2010
like i said before, they will agree in the 50 million range. they are not fucking him by any means. he will still be the highest paid SS. he is just like any other player out there, trying to get as much money as possible. look how the redsox "fucked over manny". he took them to promise land after decades and they trade him.

sportsillustrated.cnn.com

all will be well soon. like i said before, nothing going over in that thread.
dj lad 1:13 AM - 29 November, 2010
Quote:
Quote:


The best part is this where the Yankees make their stand. Pay Burnett $20M a year? Okay. Pay Randy Johnson $16M a year for 2 of his worst seasons? Sure. Pay Kei Igawa $40M to sit in the minors? Absolutely.

All these shitty fucking contracts, and THIS, their HERO, this is where they draw the line? It's so comical. I am loving this.


Those shitty contracts were in a different time though, doesn't make it better, just sayin.

Should they overpay Jeter? Absofuckinglutely, but I understand them not wanting to either. Nobody is handing out huge dollar amounts like before, sure there are some boneheaded contracts, but you don't see any Joe Shmo getting 15m+/yr like years past.

The point is that they have had chances in the past, the same GM, the same ownership (basically), the same CEO of the team. They've overpaid guys that had no business being overpaid. Jeter has seen this time and time again, and he saw it, most of all, with Alex Rodriguez. A-Rod was getting NO contract offers from anyone else. Yet they gave him a deal where he's getting $25M a year or more. And now, Jeter wants a contract that ALSO takes him to his age 42 season at 25M annually. Just like A-Rod.

It's about A-Rod. It's always been about A-Rod.
Quote:
like i said before, they will agree in the 50 million range. they are not fucking him by any means. he will still be the highest paid SS. he is just like any other player out there, trying to get as much money as possible. look how the redsox "fucked over manny". he took them to promise land after decades and they trade him.

sportsillustrated.cnn.com

all will be well soon. like i said before, nothing going over in that thread.

He's not just like any other player out there -- they created him to be THE YANKEE. He's Ruth, DiMaggio, Mantle, Munson. He's THE CAPTAIN. And now he's reached free agency and they are refusing to pay him like the "monster" that he is (I'm not calling him a monster, mind you, it's just the term I'm using to describe the process of creating a "hero").

The Red Sox hardly "fucked over Manny". He played his way out of town and they accommodated his trade request. Didn't realize that honoring a players request to be dealt was fucking them over.
DJ CISC0 1:21 AM - 29 November, 2010
Anyone with half a brain knows that it's his agent making him look like a jerk. I haven't seen one quote from Jeter discussing these negotiations that made him out to be a Jerk. As far as the 72% of Post readers go....you should understand that about half of them maybe more Im guessing are Met fans....who are the biggest Jeter haters right behind Boston.

I say give Jeter his 50-60 for 4 years with an option....The Yankees know how many fans come out to see him regardless of his skill. He generates revenue point blank. When you go out to the games all you see is Jeter jerseys and shirts. I would say most kids and about 95% of female fans wear his number and come out to see him. The Yankees are well aware of that Im sure....So lets put the argument on how the Yankees are over paying for a declining SS to rest....its getting old.
lvmez 1:25 AM - 29 November, 2010
all of a sudden dj lad is the biggest jeter fan. now i've seen it all. your here defending jeter? your a joke. really.

and your saying it was ok the way the redsox treated manny????? oh man, the stuff that you type is too funny.

it sounds like you want to become a yankee fan.
dj lad 3:31 AM - 29 November, 2010
Quote:
all of a sudden dj lad is the biggest jeter fan. now i've seen it all. your here defending jeter? your a joke. really.

and your saying it was ok the way the redsox treated manny????? oh man, the stuff that you type is too funny.

it sounds like you want to become a yankee fan.

Jesus, you really are stupid. I'm questioning the tactics that the Yankee front office is taking. They have been pumping up Jeter as the bastion of everything good in baseball, the TRUE YANKEE, etc, and now they're shortchanging him when, quite literally, money is no object to the Yankees. It's taking a stand at such a strange, strange time. It makes no sense.

The Red Sox traded Manny because _he wanted to be traded_. His antics had run the club ragged (not running out ground balls, pushing over the traveling secretary, etc) and they honored his trade request. That's what happened. You can read about it anywhere.

Quote:
Anyone with half a brain knows that it's his agent making him look like a jerk. I haven't seen one quote from Jeter discussing these negotiations that made him out to be a Jerk. As far as the 72% of Post readers go....you should understand that about half of them maybe more Im guessing are Met fans....who are the biggest Jeter haters right behind Boston.

I say give Jeter his 50-60 for 4 years with an option....The Yankees know how many fans come out to see him regardless of his skill. He generates revenue point blank. When you go out to the games all you see is Jeter jerseys and shirts. I would say most kids and about 95% of female fans wear his number and come out to see him. The Yankees are well aware of that Im sure....So lets put the argument on how the Yankees are over paying for a declining SS to rest....its getting old.

If it's Jeter's agent who is making him look like a jerk, then Jeter should step in (just like A-Rod did!) and take control of the situation. It's his agent: the public perception that Jeter has is tied to the agent. Giving Jeter a pass for his agent's actions is silly.

He generates some revenue, but not what you think. I don't think you realize that all merchandise revenue is split between all 30 clubs, so that's not where it's really helping the Yankees. His value comes through ticket sales, especially since he's going for that 3,000th hit this year.

Again, I think the 3/45 contact is overpaying him. If Scutaro came off the year Jeter did, he'd be looking at a 2/10 contract. But that's not the point. The point is that the Yankees have a history of overpaying players who don't have the pedigree or the history with the club that Jeter has, and this is where they decide to draw a line in the sand? Very, very strange. Obviously, the 6/150 contract that Jeter wants his absurd. But you guys are completely missing my point.
dj lad 3:38 AM - 29 November, 2010
The two posts before mine demonstrate such a difference in the ability to intelligently have a conversation. CISC0 decided to, for lack of a better term, attack the post, not the poster; lvmez decided to launch into personal snipes. There's a marked difference in the way I respond to the both of you as a result. Grow up and actually learn to have a conversation, lvmez. Jesus.
lvmez 3:50 AM - 29 November, 2010
don't trip as you back pedal. yankee lover.
dj lad 4:01 AM - 29 November, 2010
Hahah, I'm sorry, where did I backpedal? OF COURSE the 3/45 contract is a MASSIVE overpay for anyone with his numbers at his age. I just think the whole situation is bizarre how Jeter thinks he deserves 6/150 and the Yankees are saying some pretty weird stuff about him in the press.

Of course, as per usual, you're making up shit (that I backpedaled, that I plagiarized my arguments, etc, etc). You have no defense. So your response will be yet another worthless comment.
DJ CISC0 5:50 AM - 29 November, 2010
Quote:
If it's Jeter's agent who is making him look like a jerk, then Jeter should step in (just like A-Rod did!) and take control of the situation. It's his agent: the public perception that Jeter has is tied to the agent. Giving Jeter a pass for his agent's actions is silly.
Why should he? That's what he pays his agent to do...it's all about playing a little hard ball right now and I think Jeter is sticking to his guns for the most part. Right now they're playing high/low ball. Just like any other type of negotiations that goes down. It's not giving Jeter a pass at all.

Quote:
He generates some revenue, but not what you think. I don't think you realize that all merchandise revenue is split between all 30 clubs, so that's not where it's really helping the Yankees. His value comes through ticket sales, especially since he's going for that 3,000th hit this year.
No, I'm fully aware of this. What I meant by the "look at all the Jeter shirts and Jerseys" at the games was just to put into light how many people actually go to see HIM and the Yanks....I was talking mostly on ticket sales.

Quote:

Again, I think the 3/45 contact is overpaying him. If Scutaro came off the year Jeter did, he'd be looking at a 2/10 contract. But that's not the point. The point is that the Yankees have a history of overpaying players who don't have the pedigree or the history with the club that Jeter has, and this is where they decide to draw a line in the sand? Very, very strange. Obviously, the 6/150 contract that Jeter wants his absurd. But you guys are completely missing my point.

I got your point...yeah, it is weird but I think this time around they (The Yankees) are actually thinking ahead...a different approach to things this time around. All the greats had to leave at some time.

Scutaro? Please, he's not a house hold name that anyone outside of beantown can even relate to, let alone knows his existence.So yeah, he should get 2/10 of what Jeter would get.

Jeter has nationwide commercials, major endorsements, etc....He's more than just a player...he's a brand. And for that, the Yanks will need to dish out....not 6/150 though....And btw that number I think was the initial asked contract....Everyone know you need to start really high when negotiating...I don't think anyone in this world took that serious.
dj lad 5:14 PM - 29 November, 2010
Quote:
Scutaro? Please, he's not a house hold name that anyone outside of beantown can even relate to, let alone knows his existence.So yeah, he should get 2/10 of what Jeter would get.

Jeter has nationwide commercials, major endorsements, etc....He's more than just a player...he's a brand. And for that, the Yanks will need to dish out....not 6/150 though....And btw that number I think was the initial asked contract....Everyone know you need to start really high when negotiating...I don't think anyone in this world took that serious.

I'm not saying Scutaro is Jeter. As I said, if Scutaro came off the year Jeter did, he'd be looking at 2/10 (that's two years, 10M total). Jeter, obviously, isn't Marco Scutaro. Don't think I was equating the two. I'm saying that, based on performance alone, if Jeter had put up those numbers while in, say, Kansas City, he would have gotten a much smaller contract offer.
DJ CISC0 8:46 PM - 3 December, 2010
LOL. I guess the Red Sox were dumb enough to think that Mariano was going to turn down the Yankees to play in Boston? I guess it doesnt hurt in trying.

sports.espn.go.com
lvmez 8:52 PM - 3 December, 2010
the funny thing is that Papelbon would love to pitch for the yankees. lucky for the redsox they have someone better than Papelbon in the pen ready to go.
Banana_Peter 11:33 PM - 3 December, 2010
Quote:
LOL. I guess the Red Sox were dumb enough to think that Mariano was going to turn down the Yankees to play in Boston? I guess it doesnt hurt in trying.

sports.espn.go.com


There was a reason why I like the guy lol
lvmez 1:24 PM - 4 December, 2010
looks like redsox are on verge of getting Gonzalez from the padres. will give them boost they need.
dj lad 8:55 PM - 4 December, 2010
Getting Mariano would have been a GREAT move. Takes away a lot from the Yankees, whose bullpen was a weak link last year. Of course, I'm not surprised at all that he resigned w/ the Yankees -- he's the kind of guy who will stay where he is for a little less because he respects history.

It wasn't a dumb move: it was an attempt to drive the price up, even a little bit, on Rivera. In fact, the Angels offered Rivera THREE years, and he turned that down. I think you're misreading the situation.

Gonzalez is a great pickup for the Red Sox. Legitimate superstar hitter who plays excellent defense. Plus, he's learned to rake against lefties, which is big.
DJ CISC0 11:02 PM - 4 December, 2010
Jeter signs for 3 years 51 mil with 4th year option.

bleacherreport.com
DJ CISC0 11:03 PM - 4 December, 2010
I agree with the Gonzalez pick up. That's a good move on Bostons part.
DJ CISC0 11:17 PM - 4 December, 2010
Quote:
Jeter signs for 3 years 51 mil with 4th year option.

bleacherreport.com

Let the hating begin.
lvmez 1:08 AM - 5 December, 2010
no one drove the price up on mariano. there is no way in hell he was leaving yankees. good try anyway. he is not like damon who after wining world series with redsox stated that he most enjoyed playing with the yankees.
dj lad 2:01 AM - 5 December, 2010
lvmez, it was an ATTEMPT to drive up the price. And we don't know that it didn't -- he's entering his age 41 season and for all we know, he was only getting a 1-year offer from the Yankees (sort of what Pettitte seems to get every season). If the Angels and Red Sox offering up 3 or 2 years that it made the Yankees go to 2.

Not that it matters, anyway. Unlimited budget and all.

The Jeter deal is good for the Yankees. He wanted 6/120 or something absurd and this is WAY lower. Jeter knows there wasn't anyone on the open market that would pay him even 3/45, so he gets what will amount to 3/54M (there's no way he has that 4th year picked up unless he has a decent third year). That's a massive overpay, but it's the way it works. Cashman won this.
dj lad 5:16 AM - 5 December, 2010
Actually, it's 3/48. The deal is 16M a year, but the 4th year is an option. If the team turns it down, it's 3/51. Then, if the Yankees pick up the 4th year it becomes 4/56.

Interesting bit about the contract:

"Jeter's contract includes a point system in which he earns points for winning the Most Valuable Player Award or finishing in the top six in the voting, for winning the Silver Slugger Award, for being named MVP in the World Series or the League Championship Series, or for winning the Gold Glove. If and when Jeter notches any of those incentives, he will earn an undisclosed amount of points. After three years, those points will translate to a dollar amount, which will be added to Jeter's salary in 2014. Jeter can earn as much as $9 million in incentives, so the maximum amount he could earn in the final year of the deal is $17 million. The most Jeter could earn in all four years is $65 million.

If Jeter doesn't maximize the $9 million in incentives across the first three seasons, he also has the chance to earn points in the fourth year of the contract and therefore add to his $8 million salary. In addition, Jeter agreed to defer some money in the deal."

That's a pretty damn unique contract. Pretty awesome that the Yankees and Jeter came to a contract that was reasonable (all things considered) and found a way for Jeter to get paid if he does play very well.
DJ CISC0 3:14 PM - 6 December, 2010
Quote:
lvmez, it was an ATTEMPT to drive up the price. And we don't know that it didn't -- he's entering his age 41 season and for all we know, he was only getting a 1-year offer from the Yankees (sort of what Pettitte seems to get every season). If the Angels and Red Sox offering up 3 or 2 years that it made the Yankees go to 2.

I never heard anything about the Yankees only wanting Mo back for 1 year. All this time it was two.

Those details in the Jeter contract are really interesting. Hopefully he'll play decent ball, make his money, and go out on a good note.
dj lad 7:58 AM - 8 December, 2010
AHAHAHAHHAHAHA JAYSON WERTH

7/126

HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

HHhahahaha... oh man.

What an AWFUL contract. NATSTOWN!
DJ CISC0 9:14 PM - 8 December, 2010
Quote:
AHAHAHAHHAHAHA JAYSON WERTH

7/126

HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

HHhahahaha... oh man.

What an AWFUL contract. NATSTOWN!
WTF? What were they thinking? So I'm guessing that Crawford will be asking for more if he uses this in his bargaining? When will this madness stop? That's just crazy and dumb.

So it looks like the Yanks offered Lee 6/140-150.....I'm not feeling that deal...not for 6 years.
Banana_Peter 4:02 AM - 9 December, 2010
I hope Yankees offer me 4 yrs/$62 million to DJ at the Yankees Stadium
dj lad 7:43 AM - 9 December, 2010
The only way Lee goes to NY is if you offer AT LEAST 6 years.

It's crazy that Crawford only got marginally more. I don't love the money in the deal, but it's not my money. This sets the Red Sox up to have one of the fastest outfields in baseball history in 2012, with Ellsbury, Crawford, and Reddick. Wow.
slimmjimm 1:16 PM - 9 December, 2010
Quote:
The only way Lee goes to NY is if you offer AT LEAST 6 years.

It's crazy that Crawford only got marginally more. I don't love the money in the deal, but it's not my money. This sets the Red Sox up to have one of the fastest outfields in baseball history in 2012, with Ellsbury, Crawford, and Reddick. Wow.



I thought everybody was supposed to be handing out down to earth contracts, please no more payroll hate from RSN, you guys officially count towards high salary teams (I know they had high salaries before) The AGon and Crawford deals are no different than CC and Tex.

Ellsbury will only count if he mans up and stops being Pavano, but all in all that outfield is a beast. Now they need their pitching to hold up, although, naturally, I hope it doesn't.

Back to the Yankees, do we actually "need" Lee? I'm a little leery of the contract, and I know that since the Sox signed Crawford they will up their ante to counter that move, but is there someone else we could grab (or already have) for a decent price not named Zack Greinke? I didn't get to any AAA games last year even though I'm only 10 minutes away (in traffic) from the farm team.
lvmez 1:51 PM - 9 December, 2010
We need Lee. It looks Petite is leaning towards retirement. Even though I think AJ will have a bounce back year, you never know. We have the prospects to get Grenke if we wanted. Getting Lee first is top prioty.
dj lad 2:46 PM - 9 December, 2010
Uh, slimm, you do realize the Red Sox payroll is actually slightly lower than last year's right?

Also, for fun, the 6 largest contracts in MLB history:
1 Alex Rodriguez, $275,000,000 (2008-17)
2 Alex Rodriguez, $252,000,000 (2001-10)
3 Derek Jeter, $189,000,000 (2001-10)
4 Joe Mauer, $184,000,000 (2011-18)
5 Mark Teixeira, $180,000,000 (2009-16)
6 CC Sabathia, $161,000,000 (2009-15)
lvmez 3:41 PM - 9 December, 2010
Add Lee to that list too. Then i I will ask you, does it matter?
DJ CISC0 3:51 PM - 9 December, 2010
Quote:
It's crazy that Crawford only got marginally more. I don't love the money in the deal, but it's not my money. This sets the Red Sox up to have one of the fastest outfields in baseball history in 2012, with Ellsbury, Crawford, and Reddick. Wow.

I'm reading this like WTF is he talking about? Then I go to espn....FML!

Yeah, congrats on the pickup but the Sox should now stfu with the "buying championships" arguement. Add that to the fact that they threw Gonzalez over 150 mil a few days ago....yeah the Red Sox arent trying to buy themselves a trip to the WS right?
dj lad 4:16 PM - 9 December, 2010
I'm confused; the Red Sox payroll this season will be below last years. When Gonzalez' contract extension kicks in next year, they'll have shed $60M off the payroll. The Red Sox gave big contracts to players who are either in their prime or entering it now; the Yankees just gave $17M a year to a 37 year old shortstop whose skills are declining RAPIDLY - no other team in baseball could do that.

Of the players on the active roster, the following players were acquired via trade or through the draft: Lester, Buchholz, Beckett, Doubront, Papelbon, Bard, Bowden, Saltalamacchia, Gonzalez, Pedroia, Youkilis, Ellsbury, Varitek, Lowrie, and Kalish. That's 15. Of the guys acquired via free agency -- Lackey, Matsuzaka, Wakefield, Tazawa, Atchison, Scutaro, Drew, Cameron, Ortiz, McDonald, Crawford, and Iglesias (and I'd assume 3 free agent relievers), only Lackey, Matsuzaka, Drew, Crawford and Cameron were given "big" contracts (and no one whined about Mike Cameron's contract). The rest of the free agents were first signed for a low annual value or have yet to reach free agency at all (or are like Wakefield, who I see as a lot like Rivera -- even when he reaches FA, he's not going anywhere... of course Wakefield is 10% of the price, but I digress).

So, even with acquiring Crawford and Gonzalez, the Red Sox STILL won't break the luxury tax threshold (and if they do, it will be by a very slim margin); compare and contrast to the Yankees, who are probably going to be up near $220, or well over the luxury tax threshold (of course, if Cliff Lee signs elsewhere, who knows).

In conclusion: zip it.
lvmez 4:33 PM - 9 December, 2010
so your saying paying crawford that money, is not overpaying? c'mon son!

I personally don't care if players are overpaid. if the club is making money, i want to see profits go back into the team. but to think that that the red sox aren't doing the same thing the yankees are doing is CRAZY!
DJ CISC0 4:41 PM - 9 December, 2010
No one mentioned overall payroll. Don't try to spin this in another direction like you always like doing. All I said was that the Red Sox now have money to throw around like the Yankees and are not hesistating giving huge contracts to players. Cameron was another one I forgot about but thanks for reminding me.
slimmjimm 5:32 PM - 9 December, 2010
Quote:


So, even with acquiring Crawford and Gonzalez, the Red Sox STILL won't break the luxury tax threshold (and if they do, it will be by a very slim margin); compare and contrast to the Yankees, who are probably going to be up near $220, or well over the luxury tax threshold (of course, if Cliff Lee signs elsewhere, who knows).

In conclusion: zip it.



Huh? The Yankees aren't the only team paying luxury tax.

And as said, my only argument is the "buying the world championship" bullshit has got to stop with the recent Sox additions, never mind the fact that they are veeeery close to second or second every year. In fact, in line with "buying the championship" besides the Yankees overly bloated payroll last year (yes I said it) the Sox had the highest for a WS winner.

I really don't care that the payrolls are high, I think that teams (besides the FL teams) make enough money to approach at least $75m, and it's bullshit to field a $20m team. My (and other) Yankee fans argument is simply stop complaining about the payroll like we're the only team that does it.

As far as the Jeter thing, yes he got overpaid, but he is getting slightly less than last year IIRC, and speaking of over paying aging players with diminished skill sets, aren't the Sox paying Ortiz $12.5m?

Sorry if this seems like a Yanks vs. Sox rant (isn't it always) I just have a chip on my shoulder today, you guys really are going to field a good team next year.
dj lad 5:32 PM - 9 December, 2010
The Red Sox have had money to throw around for a while (Cameron's contract was, what, 2/15.5? Hardly an overpay or an example of throwing money around). This isn't new.

The Red Sox have brought in ONE big ticket free agent each of the last two years (Lackey and Crawford). Gonzalez required the Red Sox give up 3 of their top 5 prospects. Going back, the last big ticket FAs before that were Matsuzaka, JD Drew and Julio Lugo (and Matsuzaka wasn't a FA - he was acquired via the posting system). So that's 5 in the last 5 offseasons (06-07, 07-08, 08-09, 09-10, 10-11). For the most part, the Red Sox have brought in players on 1 or 2 year deals (like Cameron, Beltre, Smoltz) and hoped they panned out. They did give bigger deals to four internal guys as well; Lowell reached FA and was signed; same with Schilling, but that was a 1/13 deal. Ortiz and Beckett never got to FA, though. In total, that's 6 players who got at least $40M (or $10M annual contract) in a free agent contract (Lugo's was 4/36, but I'll include it). Their total contract value for all six players is $420M in total free agent contracts.

Contrast that with the Yankees, who have signed the following players to $40M+ (or $10 annual short term contract) free agent deals in the last five offseasons:

Rodriguez, Jeter, Teixeira, Sabathia, Burnett, Rivera, Posada, Pettitte, Mussina. Nine of them, totaling $933.65M in FREE AGENT contracts (Pettitte signed a series of one-year deals; Rivera signed two deals; Mussina took a 2-year deal; A-Rod opted out of the largest contract in MLB history only to sign a more lucrative one; Jeter robbed the Yankees; Teixeira, Burnett, and Sabathia all got huge contracts; Posada has big ears).

If you can't tell the difference, then you're just ignoring simple economics.
slimmjimm 5:34 PM - 9 December, 2010
Another Q for Sox fans, with AGon, how does Youk handle the the transition back to third? I know it's his natural position, but just an honest question.
dj lad 5:39 PM - 9 December, 2010
Quote:
Quote:




So, even with acquiring Crawford and Gonzalez, the Red Sox STILL won't break the luxury tax threshold (and if they do, it will be by a very slim margin); compare and contrast to the Yankees, who are probably going to be up near $220, or well over the luxury tax threshold (of course, if Cliff Lee signs elsewhere, who knows).

In conclusion: zip it.



Huh? The Yankees aren't the only team paying luxury tax.

And as said, my only argument is the "buying the world championship" bullshit has got to stop with the recent Sox additions, never mind the fact that they are veeeery close to second or second every year. In fact, in line with "buying the championship" besides the Yankees overly bloated payroll last year (yes I said it) the Sox had the highest for a WS winner.

I really don't care that the payrolls are high, I think that teams (besides the FL teams) make enough money to approach at least $75m, and it's bullshit to field a $20m team. My (and other) Yankee fans argument is simply stop complaining about the payroll like we're the only team that does it.

As far as the Jeter thing, yes he got overpaid, but he is getting slightly less than last year IIRC, and speaking of over paying aging players with diminished skill sets, aren't the Sox paying Ortiz $12.5m?

Sorry if this seems like a Yanks vs. Sox rant (isn't it always) I just have a chip on my shoulder today, you guys really are going to field a good team next year.

The Yankees aren't the only ones, sure. From 2003 through 2009 (don't have the 2010 numbers), four teams broke the luxury tax threshold. The Tigers paid a total of 1.3M; the Angels 927k, the Red Sox 13.8M. And the Yankees paid $174.2M. So let's not just say "well other teams have done it too". It's like a fat girl saying "well, you're eating ice cream too!" as you finish a small dish and she's on her ninth sundae of the afternoon.

As I said before, the Red Sox have spent less than half of what the Yankees have on big ticket free agents in the last five offseasons, and more than likely, that number is going to only get wider as the Yankees certainly aren't done spending this offseason (whether its Lee, Pettitte, or whomever else). I'm not claiming the Red Sox are poor; I'm claiming that putting them in the same boat as the Yankees is just idiotic as every financial analysis of this situation shows just isn't true.

Youkilis will be fine at 3B -- in the last few years when he's been over there, he's been a plus defender. I'm not too concerned about him. He'll be a downgrade from Beltre, but you'd say the same for anyone.
slimmjimm 5:53 PM - 9 December, 2010
Quote:
The Red Sox have had money to throw around for a while (Cameron's contract was, what, 2/15.5? Hardly an overpay or an example of throwing money around). This isn't new.

The Red Sox have brought in ONE big ticket free agent each of the last two years (Lackey and Crawford). Gonzalez required the Red Sox give up 3 of their top 5 prospects. Going back, the last big ticket FAs before that were Matsuzaka, JD Drew and Julio Lugo (and Matsuzaka wasn't a FA - he was acquired via the posting system). So that's 5 in the last 5 offseasons (06-07, 07-08, 08-09, 09-10, 10-11). For the most part, the Red Sox have brought in players on 1 or 2 year deals (like Cameron, Beltre, Smoltz) and hoped they panned out. They did give bigger deals to four internal guys as well; Lowell reached FA and was signed; same with Schilling, but that was a 1/13 deal. Ortiz and Beckett never got to FA, though. In total, that's 6 players who got at least $40M (or $10M annual contract) in a free agent contract (Lugo's was 4/36, but I'll include it). Their total contract value for all six players is $420M in total free agent contracts.

Contrast that with the Yankees, who have signed the following players to $40M+ (or $10 annual short term contract) free agent deals in the last five offseasons:

Rodriguez, Jeter, Teixeira, Sabathia, Burnett, Rivera, Posada, Pettitte, Mussina. Nine of them, totaling $933.65M in FREE AGENT contracts (Pettitte signed a series of one-year deals; Rivera signed two deals; Mussina took a 2-year deal; A-Rod opted out of the largest contract in MLB history only to sign a more lucrative one; Jeter robbed the Yankees; Teixeira, Burnett, and Sabathia all got huge contracts; Posada has big ears).

If you can't tell the difference, then you're just ignoring simple economics.


In that $933.65 vein, you also have longer contracts, so while yes, the Yankees give out huge money, but it's over a longer contract life. Take out A Rods stupid contract and the number goes down almost a third.

I know they over pay, and while the fat girl argument is valid, at what point is a muffin top any less muffiny.

Also FYI: www.stevetheump.com

Also with your not done spending argument, really no one IMO is done spending yet, be it trade/extension or FA signing. You can't call the whatever Pettite will get making the margin wider, if the Yankees lose out on Lee, who will you complain about? The only thing we did so far this offseason is pay huge money to an around average legacy player.
dj lad 6:09 PM - 9 December, 2010
I'm aware of the Red Sox payroll; since 1998, the Yankees have spent roughly 2.024B, the Red Sox 1.454B. That gap is huge. Not sure why you'd post that other than to make my point for me.

Fine, remove the A-Rod contract and the Yankees have still outspent the Red Sox and every other club by a healthy margin. It's a dumb contract, but I'd rather have that than the Ryan Howard one.

The 2012 Free Agent class looks to be pretty weak outside of Pujols and Fielder (Pujols will likely resign w/ the Cardinals; Fielder is a bad-body type and I wouldn't touch him with a ten-foot pole). Cano will likely be re-upped by the Yankees. JD Drew? Nick Swisher? Sizemore has health issues. CJ WIlson, Roy Oswalt, Broxton and Papelbon are the only pitchers that interest me. The point here is that if you're going to make a FA splash, this was the year to do it. The Red Sox did; and next year they're going to shed the contracts of Ortiz, Drew, Papelbon, and Cameron -- that's gonna be a lot of cash coming off the books with no one really to spend it on. I suspect the payroll for 2012 will be around 150M or so.

If the Yankees, lose out on Lee, I'll complain about how much I hate the Yankees and that I hope Robinson Cano dies of feline AIDS. Fair?
DJ CISC0 7:27 PM - 9 December, 2010
I wonder what the haters were bitching about in the 50s when the Yankees won 6 WS in 9 years....What was the payroll back then?
dj lad 8:38 PM - 9 December, 2010
Um, do you realize how baseball worked in the 50s? There was no free agency. Players were basically indentured servants to the club. They had no power - payrolls didn't REALLY matter since all the players were making roughly the same (some players made more, but it wasn't all that much). You've heard stories about how there were Hall of Fame players who had to take second jobs in the winter, right?

What DID happen then, though, was that the Yankees would take their large sums of money and use it to _buy_ players, literally, from other teams. The Kansas City A's are the best example of that; in fact one of the owners of the A's was a minority owner of the Yankees as well. As a result, they would engage in INCREDIBLY lopsided trades, such as the one that brought Roger Maris to New York.

So yeah, the Yankees have been playing by the own rules for a while.
lvmez 9:18 PM - 9 December, 2010
i can't believe you are trying to say the red sox don't play by the same rules the yankees do. you are truly a hater! 142 million for crawford is idiotic. worse than the werth signing. crawford is a great player but not in the 20 million league.
dj lad 1:58 AM - 10 December, 2010
Uh, they don't play by the same rules, or they'd be also spending $200M a year. For the most part, they've been between $120 and $140. You can see for yourself in that link. You can't be that dumb -- you're just sticking your head in the sand and saying "TEH RED SUXXXX ARE JUST AS BAD AS THE YANKEESsss!!!!!!1"

And, no, it's a fine contract and WAY better than Werth's; why don't you back your reasoning up? Oh, that's right, as per usual, you can't. But I will.

By the fangraphs value metric, Crawford was worth $27.5M last year. People look at Crawford's career OBP and scoff, but they forget that he in the majors at age 20. 4 of the last 5 years, he's had an OBP over 348. He's had a SLG over 450 every year (except one) 2004. Add in that he's a top-notch basestealer (career 82%, which is above the break-even point for a base-stealer to have value) and that he's a top 5 outfield defender who is just entering his prime (he's entering his age 29 season), he absolutely is worth his deal.

Jayson Werth is 32 years old with a total of 684 hits. Crawford had that many by the time he was 24. There's a MAJOR difference between the two hitters and if you can't see the difference... wow. Werth isn't a bad hitter, don't get me wrong. He's probably going to age well, but there's simply no way that anyone in their right mind can think that he's a better player than Crawford.
dj lad 2:01 AM - 10 December, 2010
This is a fascinating look at how the 2010 Red Sox were formed. Look HOW many were acquired via the draft, int'l FA, or were acquired via trade using prospects. There are only 10 players who were FA pickups, and the only "big" ones are Ortiz, Drew, Lackey, and Crawford.
dj lad 2:02 AM - 10 December, 2010
lvmez 2:40 AM - 10 December, 2010
you are the only idiot reading those sites and believing all that garbage. lol. please go out and get some sunshine. you actually believe they got a good deal? they over paid for gonzalez and crawford. the next best offer was by the angels at $108 million for 6 years. they did exactly what the yankees have been doing for years. your just trying to justify it.

the bottom line is that the redsox are trying to do what the yankees did two years ago with CC and Tex. The only we know for sure is that it paid off the yankees by wining a world series. will it payoff for the red sox?

p.s. why aren't you bring the shit load of cash they paid japan for dice k?
dj lad 7:51 AM - 10 December, 2010
I'll ignore the personal attacks ("go out and get some sunshine", etc) and move on to the actual analysis (which you have done, literally, ZERO work to prove anything you've said. ZERO. I'm plagiarizing things -- nope, no proof. Ever. You make statements without any fact behind them, and then I just rip them to shreds using actual thoughts and numbers and facts. Yawn.)

Read ANY analytical website and see what they say about the deal. Fangraphs, ESPN, Baseball Prospectus, etc, etc, etc. You're in the HUGE minority when it comes to the contract. In the end it comes down to this: Theo Epstein is smarter than me. And you. And I'd take his understanding of the game and contracts as well, over mine and yours.

Also, that 6/108 bit was actually false -- it was 6/108 with a vesting option (from what I've heard it was based on games missed due to injury, and for a guy who has been remarkably healthy, it was basically a guaranteed option) of 22M, which makes it 7/130. Or, basically, 1.7M less a year. So... in the end... uh..... not much? Right. As per usual, you're wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

The bottom line is that the Red Sox paid out... well, let's see here: $142M to Crawford, and next year, they'll pay Gonzalez about $6M. That's $148M, or less than Sabathia's total contract. Now, you can pretend that the Red Sox ARE OMG JUST LIKE THE YANKEES or we can look at actual facts and not the fucking idiocy you make up in your 75 IQ brain.

Will the Sox end up paying Gonzalez more? Probably. But it won't be on this years payroll, and it will be on next years. All we have are facts and actual, real, tangible information.

Finally, as for the cash the Sox paid out to Seibu for Daisuke Matsuzaka, it's not on the payroll. They looked at it like a marketing fee; and it makes sense. According to most reports, the Red Sox have made that money back already through independent revenue streams in Japan. Literally any team could have done what the Red Sox did. Now, am I denying that the Red Sox are a financial power house? Of course not. But they're on the same level as Philadelphia, the Mets, the Tigers, and the Angels, rather than the Yankees.

I'll predict your response now:

Quote:
DURRRRRR.... I cant domath becuz my brain cant do that stuffs! And your a big poopybrain who steals others people ideasss!


Seriously, you should run along. Adults are talking.
dj lad 7:52 AM - 10 December, 2010
Wait, wait, wait, I just re-read what you wrote:

"They overpaid for Gonzalez".

Are you for real? The guy is probably one of the five best hitters in baseball. Wow. You really are dumb.
dj lad 8:03 AM - 10 December, 2010
You know what, I'm done debating with you. I'd have better success getting through to a brick wall.

Cheers.
DVDjHardy 8:39 AM - 10 December, 2010
Quote:
Wait, wait, wait, I just re-read what you wrote:

"They overpaid for Gonzalez".

Are you for real? The guy is probably one of the five best hitters in baseball. Wow. You really are dumb.


lvmez: i25.tinypic.com
lvmez 4:17 PM - 10 December, 2010
lad, and here comes your cheerleader to the rescue.

i have more respect for lad, at least he spends 14 hours a day on the computer looking at baseball websites to try and prove people wrong online.

hardy just comes on here to try and fit in. what a loser. what are the tigers doing this off season. any predictions for next year?
DVDjHardy 4:21 PM - 10 December, 2010
The Tigers are also calling you a dumbass. Prediction for next year: You'll still be a dumbass.
lvmez 4:28 PM - 10 December, 2010
lol. should we pull some predictions you made from last year.

oh, i forgot your a rangers fan now.
lvmez 4:30 PM - 10 December, 2010
the tigers are dumb asses for giving dontrelle willis a 3 year 29 million extension. how did that work out for them?
DJ CISC0 10:12 PM - 11 December, 2010
Quote:
Um, do you realize how baseball worked in the 50s? There was no free agency. Players were basically indentured servants to the club. They had no power - payrolls didn't REALLY matter since all the players were making roughly the same (some players made more, but it wasn't all that much). You've heard stories about how there were Hall of Fame players who had to take second jobs in the winter, right?

So yeah, the Yankees have been playing by the own rules for a while.

Of course I know how it worked back then. I just don't see whats the problem if the Yanks were doing this since back then. Every other team had the same opportunity to do the same and owners chose to stuff their pockets instead of investing back into the team....How it that the Yankees fault?
DJ CISC0 10:15 PM - 11 December, 2010
Quote:
i have more respect for lad, at least he spends 14 hours a day on the computer looking at baseball websites
This made me LMAO!
dj lad 12:43 AM - 12 December, 2010
For the record, I spend 15 hours a day.

Interesting story about Crawford signing, and how it really wasn't an overpay.-

Quote:
The Angels, like the Red Sox, had come in with something of a lowball offer initially -- six years at $108 million. Moreno approved an additional guaranteed year and slightly more than $2 million per season. The Angels, then, were ready to meet Crawford's seven-year, $142 asking price.

While the respective teams got ownership approval, Genske and Peters approached Crawford. If both teams come back with we've requested, they asked, which team will you choose? To the surprise of some, Crawford answered: Boston.

In a final phone call, concluding at 10:50, ten minutes before Genske and Peters were set to meet with the Angels, the Red Sox were told that Crawford had agreed to their terms and an agreement was in place.

Minutes later, Crawford's agents went to deliver the bad news to Reagins, who was irate. When Reagins reminded the agents, "You told me $142 million [would get it done]!" the agents responded: "We said that's what it would take; we didn't say we'd [guarantee] a deal."


Pretty interesting.
lvmez 1:07 AM - 12 December, 2010
still over pay. he is the highest paid outfielder in history. there is a reason why outfielders don't get first base or third base money. he is a GREAT player hands down, but less money would have gotten him.
dj lad 1:42 AM - 12 December, 2010
For the record:

Manny Ramirez' contract was larger. 8/160. On an annual basis, Crawford's is larger, though.

I have no idea if he could have been attained for less. You don't either. What we know is that the Angels offer was close to the Red Sox one on an annual basis and they matched. The agent could have brought that back to the Red Sox and said "he wants more", and he didn't. He wanted to play for the Red Sox.
DJ CISC0 3:00 AM - 12 December, 2010
So you're basically disagreeing with what every media outlet is saying with regards to Crawford being the highest paid outfielder? Lol.

I can't wait for Crawford to bomb next year so Gonzalez can come in with his rape price that the red sox WILL pay. I wonder what you'll say then?
lvmez 3:59 AM - 12 December, 2010
Quote:
For the record:

Manny Ramirez' contract was larger. 8/160. On an annual basis, Crawford's is larger, though.


your so funny. even when you agree with me you try and disagree. And of course they could have been obtained for less. you just answered your own question. he wanted to play for the redsox. he had a number that he wanted to get paid. if the sox would have offered 1 miilion a year less, he still would have chosen them over any other team(except yankees). the bottom line is that they got the best outfielder who available this year.

in my opinion, the only outfielder worth that much money is ichiro(in his prime).
dj lad 9:37 AM - 12 December, 2010
Quote:
So you're basically disagreeing with what every media outlet is saying with regards to Crawford being the highest paid outfielder? Lol.

I can't wait for Crawford to bomb next year so Gonzalez can come in with his rape price that the red sox WILL pay. I wonder what you'll say then?

Uh, well, I'm saying he's the highest paid outfielder per year, yes. But he's not for the life of a contract. That's a DIFFERENT contract the Red Sox paid out, not this one. Ha ha.

Do you really think Crawford will bomb? Honest question.
dj lad 9:38 AM - 12 December, 2010
The fact that lvmez thinks Ichiro was worth $142M says it all.

Hey, do you think Nolan Ryan is one of the ten best pitchers of all time?
lvmez 12:46 PM - 12 December, 2010
ichiro is a hall of famer. gold glover, steals, 2244 hits in 10 seasons, .331 lifetime average.

your right about manny though. best right hand hitter in this era. BUT the WORST outfielder in history. the only that saved him was knowing how to play balls off the green monster. steriods might keep him out of hall.
DJ CISC0 7:19 PM - 12 December, 2010
Quote:
Do you really think Crawford will bomb? Honest question.
Of course not but anything could happen right? I just think it'll be funny as hell if that happens.
dj lad 4:42 AM - 13 December, 2010
Quote:
LOL. I guess the Red Sox were dumb enough to think that Mariano was going to turn down the Yankees to play in Boston? I guess it doesnt hurt in trying.

sports.espn.go.com


Just for kicks, I'll mention this:

"According to multiple major league sources, Mariano Rivera's representatives were the ones to initiate contact with the Red Sox in an attempt to get the team interested in the closer. While the Red Sox would ultimately make a two-year offer to Rivera, according to sources the team's expectation was that he would be returning to the Yankees. The 41-year-old ultimately re-signed with New York, securing a two-year, $30 million deal."

Yeah, the Red Sox were really stupid to answer the phone when Rivera's agent called.
slimmjimm 2:03 PM - 13 December, 2010
Quote:
Quote:


LOL. I guess the Red Sox were dumb enough to think that Mariano was going to turn down the Yankees to play in Boston? I guess it doesnt hurt in trying.

sports.espn.go.com


Just for kicks, I'll mention this:

"According to multiple major league sources, Mariano Rivera's representatives were the ones to initiate contact with the Red Sox in an attempt to get the team interested in the closer. While the Red Sox would ultimately make a two-year offer to Rivera, according to sources the team's expectation was that he would be returning to the Yankees. The 41-year-old ultimately re-signed with New York, securing a two-year, $30 million deal."

Yeah, the Red Sox were really stupid to answer the phone when Rivera's agent called.


Although Paps is seemingly getting progressively questionable (citing his previous body of work, he's still the #2 closer in baseball), it seems like it was only a mind fuck to offer him a deal.

Didn't the Sox also offer Jeter a deal, or was that just speculation? That would also be the same.
lvmez 3:07 PM - 13 December, 2010
Quote:
Quote:

LOL. I guess the Red Sox were dumb enough to think that Mariano was going to turn down the Yankees to play in Boston? I guess it doesnt hurt in trying.

sports.espn.go.com


Just for kicks, I'll mention this:

"According to multiple major league sources, Mariano Rivera's representatives were the ones to initiate contact with the Red Sox in an attempt to get the team interested in the closer. While the Red Sox would ultimately make a two-year offer to Rivera, according to sources the team's expectation was that he would be returning to the Yankees. The 41-year-old ultimately re-signed with New York, securing a two-year, $30 million deal."

Yeah, the Red Sox were really stupid to answer the phone when Rivera's agent called.


where did you read that? it's not in that article? espn NY had yankees beat writer who stated exactly what the article stated. it seems to me that the red sox have no confidence in paps.
lvmez 3:10 PM - 13 December, 2010
on another note, the longer lee takes to make decision the more I think he will join the rangers. I hope I am wrong.
dj lad 5:30 PM - 13 December, 2010
www.weei.com

The Red Sox have.... low confidence in him, not none.
dj lad 5:31 PM - 13 December, 2010
And no, the Red Sox aren't stupid enough to offer Derek Jeter a deal that would top the Yankees offer. I could see Theo offering what he's worth, which is about 1yr7per or 2yr6per or something.
DJ CISC0 8:49 PM - 13 December, 2010
Quote:
Just for kicks, I'll mention this:

"According to multiple major league sources, Mariano Rivera's representatives were the ones to initiate contact with the Red Sox in an attempt to get the team interested in the closer. While the Red Sox would ultimately make a two-year offer to Rivera, according to sources the team's expectation was that he would be returning to the Yankees. The 41-year-old ultimately re-signed with New York, securing a two-year, $30 million deal."

Yeah, the Red Sox were really stupid to answer the phone when Rivera's agent called.

I just read this on Bleacher Report...what's the big deal? They still made an offer right? I mean, no one forced them to make one to Mo. They could've easily said no thanks were not interested....we got our "man"....But I guess not.
dj lad 9:39 PM - 13 December, 2010
I would ABSOLUTELY take Rivera on my team for 2/30. He's still dominant -- offering him a deal for those years and money is a smart choice, especially since he came to them.

What am I missing here?
dj lad 11:24 PM - 13 December, 2010
A friend (not me, don't want lvmez to think I'm stealing other peoples thoughts here) sent me this.

From 2003 to 2009 (7 seasons), the Red Sox spent $948.9 million in terms of payroll and luxury tax. The Yankees have spent $1.641 billion in terms of payroll and luxury tax.

In other words, almost $94 million more a year.

So, can we stop with the "Red Sox are just like the Yankees", for the last time? I think this seals the discussion up nice and tight.
lvmez 1:39 AM - 14 December, 2010
tell your "friend" to do that number over excluding the luxury tax. the actual payroll will not be that different. the bottom line is that the red sox are using the same strategy as the yankees, give more years and little more per year and you will get your guy.
dj lad 1:51 AM - 14 December, 2010
I just did it myself.

It's 70.7M a year in difference.

So, once again, you're wrong. Do you get sick of being wrong?
dj lad 1:55 AM - 14 December, 2010
Tell me, is $70.7M a year "not that different"?

I mean, it's basically take the Red Sox and add A-Rod, Sabathia and Burnett.

Or the entire Reds, Rangers, Twins, or Rays opening day roster.

Good luck fumbling your way out of this one.
lvmez 2:25 AM - 14 December, 2010
www.cbssports.com

where do you get 70.7 million?

let me break it down for you: it looks like you missed grades 1-12.

$206,333,389
$162,747,333-
-----------------
$ 43,586,056=


douche.


"Good luck fumbling your way out of this one."
dj lad 4:02 AM - 14 December, 2010
Wow. You really are THAT dumb.

Okay, did you read that it was 2003-2009? Like, that's LITERALLY the very first thing I said after "a friend sent this to me".

Seriously, you need to learn to read, man. I'm worried that you might have brain damage.
dj lad 4:06 AM - 14 December, 2010
Yankees:
2003 184.4
2004 211.7
2005 213
2006 201.5
2007 207.5
2008 222.2
2009 226.3
Average: 209.5143

Red Sox:
2003 105
2004 138.8
2005 141.7
2006 137.7
2007 163
2008 145
2009 140
Average: 138.7429

If you'd like to include 2010 in there, I will. It changes to 209.11 and 141.74, or a difference of 67.37.

Yawn.
dj lad 4:08 AM - 14 December, 2010
You know I said I would stop arguing with you, but this is just too much fun.
slimmjimm 5:42 AM - 14 December, 2010
Phils supposedly reached a prelim agreement w/Lee. That is one nasty rotation.

Guess Yankee fans can whine about other teams buying championships after all.
dj lad 5:55 AM - 14 December, 2010
Except that he took a LOT less money to go there.

I guess the lesson is that Yankee fans should maybe shut their mouths and stop harassing players wives.
lvmez 11:43 AM - 14 December, 2010
I guess Lee wanted to pitch in the National league. Most aging pitchers want to.

Lad, i was pointing out 2010 because that's all that matters. within those years, red sox won 2 WS and we won 1. the red sox have closed the gap and continue to do so. Hence, the reason I keep stating that the red sox are doing the same thing the yankees are.
DVDjHardy 1:14 PM - 14 December, 2010
Quote:
i was pointing out 2010 because that's all that matters.


Haha, says the idiot that will bring up championships from before he was born.
slimmjimm 1:19 PM - 14 December, 2010
Quote:
I guess Lee wanted to pitch in the National league. Most aging pitchers want to.

Lad, i was pointing out 2010 because that's all that matters. within those years, red sox won 2 WS and we won 1. the red sox have closed the gap and continue to do so. Hence, the reason I keep stating that the red sox are doing the same thing the yankees are.


This is the argument I have with overpaying. Everybody bitches that the Yankees buy the Series, but in fact, they have only won twice in the last decade, same as the Sox.
You don't "buy" a championship unless you actually win.
slimmjimm 1:26 PM - 14 December, 2010
Quote:
Except that he took a LOT less money to go there.

I guess the lesson is that Yankee fans should maybe shut their mouths and stop harassing players wives.



True, hopefully a Phils fan doesn't puke on her. I also guess she didn't like Texas much either. It seems as if Lee was never meant to pitch in NY, getting snubbed twice in the same year is rather amusing.

I wonder if there is going to be a "curse of Cliff Lee" now, or maybe the third time will be the charm? I don't see the Phillies NOT winning for the next 5 years.
lvmez 1:28 PM - 14 December, 2010
Quote:
Quote:


i was pointing out 2010 because that's all that matters.


Haha, says the idiot that will bring up championships from before he was born.



are you wearing you phillie cheerleading outfit this morning?
dj lad 2:32 PM - 14 December, 2010
Quote:
I guess Lee wanted to pitch in the National league. Most aging pitchers want to.

Lad, i was pointing out 2010 because that's all that matters. within those years, red sox won 2 WS and we won 1. the red sox have closed the gap and continue to do so. Hence, the reason I keep stating that the red sox are doing the same thing the yankees are.

Oh, so now only 2010 matters? You're just moving the goalposts, eh? I guess you don't believe in the folly of "small sample sizes"?

Look, use one year all you want, but that's probably not the best tactic to take. It's a lot better (in general, really) to use more than one sample when looking at something like this. One year does not make a trend or a pattern. You probably said the same thing in 2007, and then the payroll went down the next two years.
DJ CISC0 4:30 PM - 14 December, 2010
Quote:
So, can we stop with the "Red Sox are just like the Yankees", for the last time? I think this seals the discussion up nice and tight.
Cmon lad...you know what we're trying to say...so stop. No one even mentioned those previous years payroll. We're talking this year and moving forward. You can bet your ass that if Crawford and Gonzalez take the Sox to the playoffs (wildcard), Boston WILL start taking that "Yankee" approach...anyone who disagrees is in denial.
lvmez 5:25 PM - 14 December, 2010
he is in denial. that is why his "friend" chose those years.
dj lad 5:55 PM - 14 December, 2010
What the fuck are you guys even talking about?

Those years were chosen because they were the first seven years of the luxury tax implications.

That's what _I'M_ talking about.

You guys are just fucking morons.
dj lad 5:59 PM - 14 December, 2010
Seriously, if you don't see that spending $90M more a year than another team over the last 8 years (when you include the luxury tax) isn't a major fucking difference, then you are, indeed, fucking morons.

If you're looking at next year, the Red Sox won't even break the luxury tax threshold, while the Yankees will be comfortably above it. This isn't fucking rocket science, it's basic fucking mathematics.
dj lad 6:07 PM - 14 December, 2010
You guys keep changing the parameters of the argument. I posted the numbers with luxury tax built in. lvmez said the numbers would be the same without it, so I did that, and as per usual, he was wrong. Then he changed his argument to say that the Red Sox are going to spend so much just like the Yankees next year and that they're the same, despite the fact that the Red Sox are spending $40M less (as of now) than the Yankees will.

The Red Sox have no NEED to take the Yankee approach. Why would they start now? The Red Sox know they can't match the Yankees payroll -- so they have to beat them through the farm system and trades.
slimmjimm 6:32 PM - 14 December, 2010
Quote:
You guys keep changing the parameters of the argument. I posted the numbers with luxury tax built in. lvmez said the numbers would be the same without it, so I did that, and as per usual, he was wrong. Then he changed his argument to say that the Red Sox are going to spend so much just like the Yankees next year and that they're the same, despite the fact that the Red Sox are spending $40M less (as of now) than the Yankees will.

The Red Sox have no NEED to take the Yankee approach. Why would they start now? The Red Sox know they can't match the Yankees payroll -- so they have to beat them through the farm system and trades.


The Red Sox can INDEED match the Yankee payroll, The Sox are NOT a small market team.

Lad, I also don't know why you are saying the Sox won't break the luxury tax threshold in 2011?

2011 - $178m

Now for the purposes of my argument, I'm just doing a quick "what if-ish" scenario. Luxury tax is assessed on the AAV of the 40 roster + benefits per www.stevetheump.com

Just by taking the Sox 2010 payroll of: $162,747,333 (number 2 payroll, again, boo hoo, Sox have no money) and adding Crawfords AAV of $20m, you bump to $182m, and that's not even counting any other contracts (arbitration awards) or additions to the 40 man, consequently, it does not include any subtractions as well, but it's just a quick exercise to disprove your point of the big bad Yankees being the only suckers to fund the Pirates and the Marlins owners pockets.

The Sox will pay luxury tax in 2011 (IMO, unfortunately I don't work in the commissioner’s office) and also going forward, how the hell much are they going to pay AGon, $5m per? I don't think so, look for another high value contract, aslo wits a high AAV.




disclaimer:

this is how I understand the luxury tax to work, if I'm incorrect, sorry, I'm just an asshole as usual.
DJ RapeWhistle 6:35 PM - 14 December, 2010
Quote:


This is the argument I have with overpaying. Everybody bitches that the Yankees buy the Series, but in fact, they have only won twice in the last decade, same as the Sox.
You don't "buy" a championship unless you actually win.


The Yankees have only won once in the last decade, actually.
DJ RapeWhistle 6:38 PM - 14 December, 2010
The Sox also have $54 million coming off the books after 2011, much of which will be replaced at zero cost by talent that's already within the organization such as Kalish, Bard, and Lowrie. So, that's something. A one year bump in operating costs to secure cornerstones for the future of the franchise isn't the same as spending as much money every single year as possible.
dj lad 6:39 PM - 14 December, 2010
Quote:
The Red Sox can INDEED match the Yankee payroll, The Sox are NOT a small market team.

Lad, I also don't know why you are saying the Sox won't break the luxury tax threshold in 2011?

2011 - $178m

Now for the purposes of my argument, I'm just doing a quick "what if-ish" scenario. Luxury tax is assessed on the AAV of the 40 roster + benefits per www.stevetheump.com

Just by taking the Sox 2010 payroll of: $162,747,333 (number 2 payroll, again, boo hoo, Sox have no money) and adding Crawfords AAV of $20m, you bump to $182m, and that's not even counting any other contracts (arbitration awards) or additions to the 40 man, consequently, it does not include any subtractions as well, but it's just a quick exercise to disprove your point of the big bad Yankees being the only suckers to fund the Pirates and the Marlins owners pockets.

The Sox will pay luxury tax in 2011 (IMO, unfortunately I don't work in the commissioner’s office) and also going forward, how the hell much are they going to pay AGon, $5m per? I don't think so, look for another high value contract, aslo wits a high AAV.

disclaimer:

this is how I understand the luxury tax to work, if I'm incorrect, sorry, I'm just an asshole as usual.

Slimm, thanks for taking the time to actually put thought into a post.

The Red Sox are not at 162 before the Crawford signing. As of now, after the Crawford signing, it's $169.1. They will likely sign one or two more relievers, going to probably about $175.

Rotation - 53.17M
Bullpen - 13.04
Regulars - 66.6125
Bench - 5.6125
40 man - ~1.5M
Benefits - 10.5M
Total - 148.9M
dj lad 6:43 PM - 14 December, 2010
I never said the Red Sox were a small market team (although, really, Boston is a smaller metro area than places like Houston, Atlanta and Miami, it's the 10th largest in the chance) -- I just said they don't spend like the Yankees do. That's a LARGE difference.
DJ RapeWhistle 6:45 PM - 14 December, 2010
Quote:
Quote:


So, can we stop with the "Red Sox are just like the Yankees", for the last time? I think this seals the discussion up nice and tight.
Cmon lad...you know what we're trying to say...so stop. No one even mentioned those previous years payroll. We're talking this year and moving forward. You can bet your ass that if Crawford and Gonzalez take the Sox to the playoffs (wildcard), Boston WILL start taking that "Yankee" approach...anyone who disagrees is in denial.


You mean like when the Red Sox signed Manny Ramirez to a monster contract, then decided that they should start throwing money at every available other free agent? Or did that not happen?
DJ CISC0 7:39 PM - 14 December, 2010
Quote:
Seriously, if you don't see that spending $90M more a year than another team over the last 8 years (when you include the luxury tax) isn't a major fucking difference, then you are, indeed, fucking morons.

If you're looking at next year, the Red Sox won't even break the luxury tax threshold, while the Yankees will be comfortably above it. This isn't fucking rocket science, it's basic fucking mathematics.

Do you even understand what we are trying to say because you keep repeating yourself over and over with the same "last 7 years" talk.

Read this part again :

Quote:
No one even mentioned those previous years payroll. We're talking this year and moving forward. You can bet your ass that if Crawford and Gonzalez take the Sox to the playoffs (wildcard), Boston WILL start taking that "Yankee" approach...anyone who disagrees is in denial.
dj lad 10:30 PM - 14 December, 2010
Quote:

Do you even understand what we are trying to say because you keep repeating yourself over and over with the same "last 7 years" talk.

Read this part again :

Quote:


No one even mentioned those previous years payroll. We're talking this year and moving forward. You can bet your ass that if Crawford and Gonzalez take the Sox to the playoffs (wildcard), Boston WILL start taking that "Yankee" approach...anyone who disagrees is in denial.

From the start, I've been talking about the last 13 years, really. In fact, we all were for a while until you guys decided to move the goalposts of the conversation.
lvmez 10:41 PM - 14 December, 2010
mr. double talk is at it again. he is the only one who thinks the red sox are a small market team.
dj lad 11:22 PM - 14 December, 2010
I said, like, four posts above yours that the RED SOX ARE NOT A SMALL MARKET TEAM.

Now, go ahead and put your idiotic spin on this.

Quote:
I never said the Red Sox were a small market team (although, really, Boston is a smaller metro area than places like Houston, Atlanta and Miami, it's the 10th largest in the chance) -- I just said they don't spend like the Yankees do. That's a LARGE difference.
slimmjimm 3:58 AM - 15 December, 2010
Quote:

Slimm, thanks for taking the time to actually put thought into a post.

The Red Sox are not at 162 before the Crawford signing. As of now, after the Crawford signing, it's $169.1. They will likely sign one or two more relievers, going to probably about $175.

Rotation - 53.17M
Bullpen - 13.04
Regulars - 66.6125
Bench - 5.6125
40 man - ~1.5M
Benefits - 10.5M
Total - 148.9M



Who the hell came off the books to drop payroll that much? Was Beltres contract that big, and what is the difference between Papis last year and his option for 2011?

Not saying you're incorrect, just an honest question, also, don't forget about arbitration, Paplebon is going to want serious money for his bad year. He is a FA next year correct? I don't see the Sox signing him again.
dj lad 6:47 AM - 15 December, 2010
I'll break it down (thanks to a friend again).

Lester - 6
Buchholz - 1
Beckett - 17
Lackey - 16.5
Matsuzaka - 8.67
Wakefield - 2.5
Doubront - .4
Tazawa - 1.1

Papelbon - 11.5
Bard - .65
Atchison - .46
Bowden - .43

Salty - .75
Gonzalez - 6.3
Pedroia - 6.75
Scutaro - 6.25
Youkilis - 10.3125
Drew - 14
Cameron - 7.75
Ellsbury - 2
Ortiz 12.5

Varitek - 2
Lowrie - .65
Kalish - .4
McDonald - .5
Iglesias - 2.0625

With Crawford, the Sox add 20.29 and go to 169.2

Below the cap.

Ortiz actually is making 500k less than the last four years and Beltre was 9M + a 1M buyout. Add in Lowell's 13M, Bill Hall's 8.25M, Victor's 8.25, and Oki's 2.75. The Red Sox shed a LOT of payroll and even with arbitration raises and free agent signings, their payroll isnt going to increase all that much.

As RW said, the Red Sox have paid for cornerstone talent in the past and haven't gone back and overdone it again and again (see: Manny). They have built the team upon a strong farm system, moving good prospects for talent players, and wise free agent investments (except for Julio Lugo and Edgar Renteria, ugh).
slimmjimm 12:51 PM - 15 December, 2010
I forgot about Lowell and V Mart, thanks.
DJ Augustin 3:14 PM - 15 December, 2010
Don't forget about Julio Lugo's $9.25M that was on the books for 2010.

Yes, almost half of the Crawford AAV was covered by Julio Freakin' Lugo.
dj lad 5:22 AM - 16 December, 2010
This is an awesome part of the Crawford contract: the Red Sox have a no-trade clause preventing him from going to the Yankees. Meaning: if the Red Sox deal him elsewhere, they can block any trade that other team makes if it involves Crawford going to the Yankees.

Now, why is this so smart? Well, basically they can force the Yankees or that other team to deal the Red Sox a good prospect or something in exchange for dropping that no-trade clause. I think it might be the first of its kind in sports.
dj lad 5:25 AM - 16 December, 2010
Also, I'd wager that CC opts out after the season. At the end of this year, he'll be 31. Cliff Lee was 32 and the Yankees offered him 7 years and about 160 million dollars. CC should probably go and try for that as well. Why wouldn't he?
tig ol' bitties 6:42 PM - 17 December, 2010
Yankees blow - Getting a taste of their own medicine SOX in 2011!!!! Yankees suck, Yankess suck!!
lvmez 7:04 PM - 17 December, 2010
so, what your saying is that the red sox are doing what the yankees usually do?
tig ol' bitties 7:07 PM - 17 December, 2010
Yup - Buying championships :) and its about time hahaha - Only difference is Sox actually have the type of players and teams that have a positive locker room without the Drama BS that goes on in NY every year...Good balance of Veterans and young players...

Id actually love to see them trade Papelbon for a good middle reliever
lvmez 7:41 PM - 17 December, 2010
see lad, here a red sox fan who also thinks that the red sox are buying championships, just like the yankees.

if there is a profit, then put it back into the team. nothing wrong with that. But we all know there is no guarantees. all that money yankees have spent and only one championship in the last decade. i still wouldn't have done anything different. keeps that seats filled every night.
tig ol' bitties 7:56 PM - 17 December, 2010
Nah you gotta see if from a Boston stand point...

The Sox have been pretty much the Cover Boys from Boston sports since the last Patriots super bowl win on 04 or whenever it was - but now with the Pats and Celtics both having super nasty teams, the Sox have almost if not have fallen from that position as "Boston's Sports Team" -

They didnt even make the playoffs this past year which hasnt happened often lately if at all this decade...With all the injuries last year the whole team was peiced together - They lost their lure in Boston with the other teams doing so well...Theo and the Front office sensed if they didnt make big moves this off season 2011 would be another awful year...

I dont think they are "buying championships" per say - They havent opened thier wallet very much for the right people.. JD Drew, Dice-K, come on...Putting up $$ for Gonzo and Carl was needed - People see now they arent scared and are going to do what it takes to put together a team that wont suck and a team the fans can get behind...Honestly I couldnt tell you a consistent line up they had last year and couldnt name half the players -

You can't win with bums - period. You can't win with a pieced together team...So now all is well in Red Sox Nation again :)
lvmez 8:24 PM - 17 December, 2010
Quote:
Yup - Buying championships :)


Quote:
I dont think they are "buying championships" per say -


call it what ever you want. it is the same concept the yanks have been doing for years. it doesn't work all the time but it is fun while they are signing big name players for big dollars.
tig ol' bitties 8:45 PM - 17 December, 2010
lol - I was half jokin in my response to buyin championships in my original post - Its more that the players WANT to play in Boston - Even with the dismal year last year the fan base is still really strong - Not as strong as it has been in past years but you will see it coming back real strong with these additions and thats the type of atmosphere most if not all professional athletes desire --

I tip my hat to Cliff Lee for turning down the Yankee offer - Dudes still making 100 mill and will be playing where he is happy - not where the $$$ is higher...People automatically think if they join the Yankees the will win a WS...Its proven not to be so true...and he realized that...Plus the media and pressure of playing in NY prob isnt the greatest of elements to play in
lvmez 10:27 PM - 17 December, 2010
new york and boston will always be great sports towns, wether the teams are doing well or not. at least we don't live in places like D.C. where people have to root for other towns.
slimmjimm 2:03 PM - 18 December, 2010
Quote:


I tip my hat to Cliff Lee for turning down the Yankee offer - Dudes still making 100 mill and will be playing where he is happy - not where the $$$ is higher...People automatically think if they join the Yankees the will win a WS...Its proven not to be so true...and he realized that...Plus the media and pressure of playing in NY prob isnt the greatest of elements to play in



I also congratulate Lee, sure I'm a bit upset about him snubbing the Yankees, but I'm glad to see that someone made a decision not based on money, maybe if that happened more often, we wouldn't see such bloated payroll. You want to play on the most storied sports franchise of all time? Then play for a reasonable contract. The Phils got him to sign with great terms (length wise)

Anyone see Arte Moreno bitching about the Crawford contract? He didn't want to pay that much because he only paid $138m for the team. It's called an investment, dipshit.

Quote:
new york and boston will always be great sports towns, wether the teams are doing well or not. at least we don't live in places like D.C. where people have to root for other towns.


Mark my words, the Nats will contend within the next 5 years. They have great talent in the system (and rehabbing) Assuming Strasburg recovers fully from Tommy John, he is going to have one hell of an arm. He already was throwing in triple digits, and I remember reading somewhere that TJ surgery can possibly give you and extra 1-2 mph.

Back to the Yankees, I'm not so sure if the pitching situation will work itself out as of right now. They will have to have Joba condition himself as a starter for this season, and Hughes, I believe should have no innings limit (within reason) I liked Ivan Nova, but they absolutely need Andy back now. I'm thinking a mid season blockbuster trade is the only way to get a quality pitcher is the way to go at this point. We also need some decent bullpen help, since Wood re-signed with the Cubbies.
lvmez 3:54 PM - 18 December, 2010
greinke fires agent and ask for trade. i don't he wants to come to ny, which is fine. i just dont want him going to boston.
DVDjHardy 4:18 PM - 18 December, 2010
Props to you Slimmjimm...you might be the coolest Yankees fan on the forum. Your posts are logical and in proper English. lol
lvmez 5:25 PM - 18 December, 2010
sounds like you might become a yankee fan hardy. we won't be surprised.
DVDjHardy 5:48 PM - 18 December, 2010
I'll stay a fan of only one baseball team until I die: Detroit Tigers. But there are 28 other teams I like to root for when they play against the Yankees.
slimmjimm 6:08 AM - 19 December, 2010
Quote:
greinke fires agent and ask for trade. i don't he wants to come to ny, which is fine. i just dont want him going to boston.


Wasn't there speculation that he wouldn't mind going to NY? He is basically all but demanding a trade, and is a bit upset about the situation in KC. I read that he pretty much didn't care about anything since they're in the gutter, maybe he can work past his head case issues to go to a larger market (and perennially playoff bound) team. I just want them to be sure if they try and trade for him that he is 100%, we don't need another P(ussy)avano, collecting a check because he's scared of the boogie monster in his closet, especially when it's going to take major chips to get it done.


Quote:
Props to you Slimmjimm...you might be the coolest Yankees fan on the forum. Your posts are logical and in proper English. lol


Thanks Hardy, I try not to be an asshole when it comes to baseball, trust me, I make up for it with everything else in life.
DJ CISC0 7:06 AM - 19 December, 2010
Quote:
Props to you Slimmjimm...you might be the coolest Yankees fan on the forum. Your posts are logical and in proper English. lol
F U Hardy! I thought I was? Sellout!.....hey did you get some free Giants tickets the other day?
DJ CISC0 7:16 AM - 19 December, 2010
If Lee's wife got spat on the last time she came here then God only knows what will happen to her the next time she does come here.

Seriously,I said it a bunch of posts above...I was never feeling that contract for that amount of years...seriously, the dude is 32!!!.....anyway....

OK Feliciano from the Mets as a MR.....Hmmmm? He does have some good stats against lefties which the Yanks need...Second best BA against lefties in the majors...that should count for something....The only thing I have is that hes been strictly in the NL.
DVDjHardy 8:02 AM - 19 December, 2010
Quote:
Quote:


Props to you Slimmjimm...you might be the coolest Yankees fan on the forum. Your posts are logical and in proper English. lol
F U Hardy! I thought I was? Sellout!.....hey did you get some free Giants tickets the other day?


haha, we're friends on twitter. Enemies in this thread...no props for you. I could have gone to that game, but I wish I had the time....just so I could go and 'boo' Brett Favre, but he didn't play and Vikings lost so I was happy.
slimmjimm 5:00 PM - 19 December, 2010
Quote:
If Lee's wife got spat on the last time she came here then God only knows what will happen to her the next time she does come here.

Seriously,I said it a bunch of posts above...I was never feeling that contract for that amount of years...seriously, the dude is 32!!!.....anyway....

OK Feliciano from the Mets as a MR.....Hmmmm? He does have some good stats against lefties which the Yanks need...Second best BA against lefties in the majors...that should count for something....The only thing I have is that hes been strictly in the NL.



Lets hope she has a suite next time.

7 years was rather long, and 5 from the Phils is perfect, I don't remember, does it have a 6th year?

I don't know much about Feliciano, I don't really follow the NL teams, hopefully he is a solid pick up, seems like there is quite a bit of decent lefty help in the pen now.
lvmez 5:30 PM - 19 December, 2010
greinke to brewers. wow.
slimmjimm 6:24 PM - 19 December, 2010
Quote:
greinke to brewers. wow.


Was just about to post this. I guess we don't need to worry about his issues after all. Who the hell else is potentially out there?
tig ol' bitties 5:35 PM - 20 December, 2010
Lee is 5 year - Option for 6 - 20 mill a year

I think all the good pitchers realize going to the NL is the place to be - Lee, Greinke will dominate...As Halladay did when he went to the NL...

No one wants to pitch in the AL esp the east
DJ CISC0 8:08 PM - 20 December, 2010
Quote:
greinke to brewers. wow.
Looks like the Yankees actually rejected a Greinke trade because he wouldn't have been a good fit? LMAO! WTF?

bleacherreport.com
slimmjimm 12:36 AM - 21 December, 2010
Quote:
Quote:


greinke to brewers. wow.
Looks like the Yankees actually rejected a Greinke trade because he wouldn't have been a good fit? LMAO! WTF?

bleacherreport.com



Not sure I really believe it, boneheaded and understandable at the same time.
The Yankees didn't want to have a part in a real life "The Scout".

But fuck, you can trade for a proven pitcher (albeit not in NY, tho he had 2 good starts in YS) for a guy who hasn't done anything but give scouts a hard on, and another guy we have no need for, and you say NO, when we NEED pitching? (note to self when ranting, remember the Yankees ALWAYS need fucking pitching)
FunkyFrank 2:16 AM - 21 December, 2010
Sorry to interrupt the thread people, but I'm trying to raise some money to become a DJ. I know its a little crazy, but theres a little something in it for anyone who donates. Check it out. [link removed]
lvmez 3:26 AM - 21 December, 2010
Quote:
Sorry to interrupt the thread people, but I'm trying to raise some money to become a DJ. I know its a little crazy, but theres a little something in it for anyone who donates. Check it out. [link removed]



ask the boston red sox. it seems they have money to throw around.
DJ CISC0 3:35 AM - 21 December, 2010
Hahahaha! Seriously? I know noobs ask for your hard drive with mp3s but now they're asking for straight up gear? Lmao! The madness has to stop!

And yeah the Red Sox have money to blow right now so if I were you I would holler at Theo bro.
slimmjimm 11:49 PM - 21 December, 2010
dj lad 1:24 AM - 22 December, 2010
That 1.49M that the Red Sox had last year is really going to hurt them.
dj lad 1:30 AM - 22 December, 2010
The Yankees are at $178 right now + 11M for Pettitte (likely) + arb raises + another bullpen arm or two + probably another starter unless they are going to have Ivan Nova in their opening day rotation. Unless you expect Mark Prior, who hasn't pitched in the majors since 2006 (and threw ONE inning last year), to make his regular turn 30+ times next year.

I really can't wait for CC to opt out.
slimmjimm 2:11 AM - 22 December, 2010
Not so sure CC will opt out. He seems happy, he's not going to get more money from anyone else, unless he tries to pull an A Rod.

The Sox seems to be spending pretty freely as well.
DJ CISC0 2:33 AM - 22 December, 2010
Quote:
I really can't wait for CC to opt out.
And why would he do that? According to your logic and stats, his arm will blow any minute. Any scout that does this for a living should know that right?
lvmez 4:55 AM - 22 December, 2010
did the boston fans forget that CC won a ring in his first year with the yanks. why would he leave? he wnats to win, he is in the right place.
dj lad 6:20 AM - 22 December, 2010
He will opt out because he is smart.

The Yankees just offered a 32 year old Cliff Lee ~$160M over 7 years. Now, CC will be 31 after this season.

You don't think he sees what the Yankees offered someone else who was older and with less of a resume and thinks he can get that much? At the very least he should opt out just to get 5 years.

He could be happy and all, but he'd be a fool to think he can't get $150m on the open market supposing he has a good and healthy season.
dj lad 6:27 AM - 22 December, 2010
At the very least: he is scheduled to make $92m from 2012-15.

Let me ask you guys something: do you think another team would offer up a 5/110 contract to CC Sabathia if he opted out? Texas? Chicago? Anaheim? The Mets?

Of course. At the very least it's leverage because it would leave the Yankees with AJ Burnett as their #1 and he knows that. If he could make another 40M on top of that, he would be dumb to walk away.
dj lad 6:28 AM - 22 December, 2010
Quote:
Quote:


I really can't wait for CC to opt out.
And why would he do that? According to your logic and stats, his arm will blow any minute. Any scout that does this for a living should know that right?

I've been wrong in the past, and I could very well be wrong on this; CC could just be a freak. Typically 300 pound baseball players don't age well.
slimmjimm 12:34 PM - 22 December, 2010
Quote:
At the very least: he is scheduled to make $92m from 2012-15.

Let me ask you guys something: do you think another team would offer up a 5/110 contract to CC Sabathia if he opted out? Texas? Chicago? Anaheim? The Mets?

Of course. At the very least it's leverage because it would leave the Yankees with AJ Burnett as their #1 and he knows that. If he could make another 40M on top of that, he would be dumb to walk away.



Or he can pull a Lee, and decide he's happy where his is both location and money wise. Point is, no one knows, I happen to think he won't.
dj lad 4:46 PM - 22 December, 2010
Lee got the largest annual contract for a pitcher ever (outside of Clemens pro-rated 2007 deal).

Sabathia would be walking away from probably $40m if he doesn't opt out.

He might be happy with the Yankees but I bet he'd be happier on the Yankees with a 7/140 deal from them.
slimmjimm 6:53 PM - 22 December, 2010
I guess a year will tell.
dj lad 7:07 PM - 22 December, 2010
Sure will.

I just think Sabathia would be foolish to NOT opt out after what we saw Cliff Lee get offered by the same team that CC is playing for currently.

You must be able to understand this logic, slimm, you're a smart guy.
DJ CISC0 7:23 PM - 22 December, 2010
Quote:
I just think Sabathia would be foolish to NOT opt out after what we saw Cliff Lee get offered by the same team that CC is playing for currently.

I highly doubt CC will whore himself like that. Sure, it's a smart move financially, but it will make him look like a money hungry douche....Not to mention, hurt his rep as a Yank....So if he's willing to go that route for 30-40 mil then more power to him. I just don't see it happening.
dj lad 10:12 PM - 22 December, 2010
But why?

A-Rod did it and got the largest contract.... ever. And he still gets cheers in New York.

JD Drew did it and got a big pay raise from the Red Sox over the Dodgers.

The excuse of "he doesn't want to look like a douche" gets a lot easier to stomach if he's getting a 7/140 or 150 deal.

As I said: he has ENORMOUS leverage. If he opts out, he either gets Cliff Lee money from the Yankees or they go into Opening Day with AJ Burnett as their #1 starter (or a different FA pitcher, like Carpenter or Oswalt). If he didn't think there was a chance of opting out, why would he and his agent have negotiated the opt out clause into his contract?
dj lad 12:05 AM - 23 December, 2010
Haha, awesome graphic.

i51.tinypic.com
slimmjimm 1:04 AM - 23 December, 2010
Quote:
Sure will.

I just think Sabathia would be foolish to NOT opt out after what we saw Cliff Lee get offered by the same team that CC is playing for currently.

You must be able to understand this logic, slimm, you're a smart guy.


You bet I understand the logic, still doesn't mean shit though.

Yeah all those other assholes did it, and the biggest A(Rod)sshole of them all made out like a fat rat, somehow I don't see CC acting like that, like I said, we'll know in a year.

CC had the clause because he didn't know if he would like NY, he won a ring his first year, and by all accounts has settled nicely in the area. I'm worried about 2011 right now, and our ace is CC, that's all that concerns me with him at the moment.
slimmjimm 1:21 AM - 23 December, 2010
Quote:
Haha, awesome graphic.

i51.tinypic.com



I wouldn't go as far as to say awesome, educational maybe.
DJ CISC0 2:07 AM - 23 December, 2010
Quote:
Haha, awesome graphic.

i51.tinypic.com
What exactly is the point of that graphic? What is it really trying to prove? Besides, it's getting old....move on.
lvmez 4:49 AM - 23 December, 2010
lad is running out of things to look up on the internet concerning th yankees so he keeps going back to payroll.

he hasn't figured out that the redsox are number two in payroll. don't bother telling him.
dj lad 6:22 AM - 23 December, 2010
You guys are too easy.
dj lad 7:51 AM - 23 December, 2010
I'll say this much: the only way he doesn't opt out is if he has a bad year or an injury, or the economy completely collapses.

If he puts up another 2010 type of year, cha-ching!
slimmjimm 12:54 PM - 23 December, 2010
Sure, he can opt out, then sign to the Sox, and up the payroll. Then all of us Yankee fans can start to laugh when their payroll goes sky high.
DJ CISC0 10:32 PM - 23 December, 2010
Quote:
Sure, he can opt out, then sign to the Sox, and up the payroll. Then all of us Yankee fans can start to laugh when their payroll goes sky high.
But then the Sox fans will still bring up the last 7 years as their arguement...lol
DJ CISC0 10:33 PM - 23 December, 2010
*argument
dj lad 10:57 PM - 23 December, 2010
Well, I'd doubt the Sox would sign him. They have Lackey, Beckett, Lester, and Buchholz locked up for the next 4 years or so, and then at the 5th spot they would likely go with Felix Doubront or someone else in their system in the 5th spot.

They would, however, do what they did with Cliff Lee, which was to offer a deal around 7/100 simply so that Lee's agent could say he had a 7 year offer, forcing other teams (like the Yankees) to up their years and overall offer.

To say the Yankees have had an awful offseason and the Red Sox have had a great one is an understatement. The Sox went out and filled up their pen, got two corner bats for the next 7 years.

The Yankees had to go to 2 years on Rivera, pissed off St. Jeter, didn't get Lee or Crawford, Kerry Wood signed for 1.5M elsewhere, Russell Martin needs knee surgery, and, oh yeah, New York still smells like pee.
slimmjimm 11:05 PM - 23 December, 2010
I would agree with your heckling to a point, I don't think anyone is mad about Rivera for 2 years.

Lester and Buchholz, fine, but Beckett is falling off, and Lackeys mole will lose magic sooner than you might think.

And you guys still wanted Martin knee surgery and all.
lvmez 12:18 AM - 24 December, 2010
Quote:
I would agree with your heckling to a point, I don't think anyone is mad about Rivera for 2 years.

Lester and Buchholz, fine, but Beckett is falling off, and Lackeys mole will lose magic sooner than you might think.

And you guys still wanted Martin knee surgery and all.


+1
dj lad 1:05 AM - 24 December, 2010
Quote:
I would agree with your heckling to a point, I don't think anyone is mad about Rivera for 2 years.

Lester and Buchholz, fine, but Beckett is falling off, and Lackeys mole will lose magic sooner than you might think.

And you guys still wanted Martin knee surgery and all.

Just to be clear, Josh Beckett is one year removed from a 122 ERA+ year and only made 21 starts last year. He was hurt most of the season. If any of you would like to wager he repeats a 75 ERA+ next year, I'll take that bet. I'd even wager it'll be at 100 or above.

As for Lackey, he threw 215 innings of league average ball (which is very valuable, although not worth his salary) and was much better in his second half than in the first. His OPS vs. in the first half was .816 and in the second it was .705. His career OPS vs. is .726, so which of the two (first half or second half) would you guys like to wager is the outlier? He's still only going into his age 32 season.

The Red Sox made moves to acquire Martin; they didn't get him at 4.5M for a guy that can't hit or field anymore. Everything I've heard is the Red Sox offered substantially less.
lvmez 4:37 AM - 24 December, 2010
Quote:
Quote:

Everything I've heard is the Red Sox offered substantially less.


i love these quotes. you act like your talking to Buster Olney. lol.
dj lad 8:06 AM - 24 December, 2010
I didn't realize that reading in multiple places the same thing was making me Buster Olney. Jeez.
dj lad 4:12 AM - 14 January, 2011
Ha.

3/35 for Rafael Soriano.

Bobby Jenks got 2/12.

Soriano's WAR was 1.6.
Jenks was 1.5.

Soriano's xFIP was 3.81.
Jenks's xFIP was 2.62.

As Brian Cashman said, "I consider myself the director of spending of the New York Yankees."
lvmez 2:03 PM - 14 January, 2011
still losing sleep over the yanks.
DJ CISC0 4:20 PM - 14 January, 2011
A little pricey? Yes, but it makes the bullpen the best in the game. The Yankees just need to lead by the 6th or 7th inning and the bullpen will shut it down from there.

If Tampa Bay had attendance issues last year then I can only imagine what they are going to go through this year....Who else is left over there?
dj lad 5:25 PM - 14 January, 2011
Best bullpen in the game? Not sure, but yes, it is good. Joba is hardly a sure thing, Feliciano is a one-hitter pitcher (at least how the Mets used him), and Robertson is pretty volatile.

The problem w/ the Soriano signing is four-fold: one, he is an extreme flyball pitcher who isn't great against lefty hitters. In Yankee Stadium, that's not good. His BABIP last year was an incredibly low .199. That's about 45 points than his career BABIP. If it just normalizes, his numbers are going to shoot up, big-time. And, when you're a fly-ball pitcher in Yankee Stadium 3, that's scary. Two, he's injury prone. Three, he has opt-out clauses after year 1 and year 2 of the contract. Meaning: if he wants to opt out after next year and try to get the Red Sox (or some other team) to sign him, he can. And when Mo retires (presumably after 2012, although he may pitch until he's 90), he can opt out and try to get a $50M contract. And four, the Yankees gave up a 1st-round pick for a RELIEVER. The Rays now have TEN picks before the Yankees make the second pick. The Red Sox have six, the Jays have seven. This is a BIG draft in terms of talent and the Yankees simply don't have the firepower to compete in the only arena where they can't buy more of something -- picks.

Don't get me wrong; he's a very good pitcher and the money doesn't mean much to the Yankees. He's absolutely going to shorten games with Mo, and at 3/20, I'd love to have him on the Red Sox. But at 3/35, it's not a good deal.
lvmez 7:32 PM - 14 January, 2011
3/35 is a great deal if your a yankees fan.
DJ CISC0 8:17 PM - 14 January, 2011
A few of those points ran across my mind too...giving up the first round pick, his trade clause, and pitching in Yankee Stadium "3".

At first I was more upset about giving up the first round pick but then thought...."who really gets good first picks anyway". Besides, the farm has been looking really lately so Yanks can always look at pulling someone up from there if needed.

His trade clause was very clever because he will get more money when he opts out when Mo leaves....considering he does a great job as a setup man. You can't hate on that.

Pitching in "YS3" wasn't really a problem last year for pitchers...I think all of those flying balls over right was addressed after the first season.
slimmjimm 8:52 PM - 14 January, 2011
Wow, baseball talk?

Not a fan of the Soriano deal at that $$. Do the Yanks have a buy out? Even if he stays on to become the closer of the future, you start out at over 11mil, at that rate he will be over Mo's salary (with Borasss as his agent) by his next contract.

The 'pen looks pretty good with the signing, guess they are going to rely on the offense to pick up any pitcher not named Sabathia or Hughes, and have then pen hold it until they do.

Joba out of 8th inning role? Does that flip flop him and Robertson, or Joba back to rotation?

So many questions, and so (relatively) little time left until ST.
DJ CISC0 9:55 PM - 14 January, 2011
Quote:
Wow, baseball talk?
Pitchers and catchers in about a month...Yanks/Phillies Feb 26.

I think and I hope Joba will not start this year. He should stay in the bullpen and rotate with whoever.
dj lad 12:08 AM - 15 January, 2011
Cisco, think of draft picks as lottery tickets.

The more early picks you have, the better chance of that lottery ticket paying off. From 2003-2010, the Red Sox have drafted 19 players in the first round and first compensation round and 9 players in the second and second comp round. That's 28 players in total. In those rounds, they got Daniel Bard, Jacoby Ellsbury, Clay Buchholz, Jed Lowrie, Michael Bowden, David Murphy, Matt Murton, Casey Kelly (centerpiece of the Gonzalez deal), Justin Masterson and Dustin Pedroia (and Jon Lester in 2002). Now, that's 9 guys (plus Kelly and Lester) that were got in the first or second round in less than a decade. That's a great hit rate. That's the value of draft picks, plain and simple -- you want as many as you can so that you can fill your roster with as many low-priced pre-arb players as you can (or trade them for talented veterans).

Sure, you have plenty of misses in there. But you can miss you don't have chances to. Banking on drafting studs every year is just a dangerous proposition.

That's what made the Soriano deal so strange. If they signed Jenks at a 2/12 deal (which cost the Red Sox nothing because he was non-tendered), they'd have a guy who is likely to give you very close or better production to Soriano's (last year was Jenks' first season with an ERA over 4.00 in his career) and it wouldn't have cost the Yankees anything other than cash.

That said, yeah, it's a good pure baseball signing since Soriano is pretty nasty. A great insurance policy for the possibility of a Rivera injury.
slimmjimm 4:11 AM - 15 January, 2011
Yeah, but to be honest, it's the 31st pick, not that it takes anything away from your lottery analogy, but the Strasburgs and Harpers went 30 picks before.

Doesn't make it better tho, and doesn't make it any less obscene that their spending like 28mil for the 8th and 9th inning.

And lad, Jenks only season OVER 4 was last year, he was right at 4 in 06. I also thought he was older than 29 (though he'll already be 30 on opening day)
dj lad 9:09 PM - 15 January, 2011
That's why I said over 4. :)

First picks since 1990 that have been at least a backup major leaguer: Chipper Jones, Phil Nevin, Alex Rodriguez, Kris Benson, Matt Anderson, Pat Burrell, Adrian Gonzalez, Joe Mauer, Darin Erstad, Delmon Young, Justin Upton, Luke Hochevar, David Price, Stephen Strasburg, Paul Wilson.

It's a good list, but there have been some serious flameouts as well (Matt Anderson, Brien Taylor, Bryan Bullington, Matt Bush). The point is that the draft is a crapshoot. You need as many picks as you can.
dj lad 6:20 PM - 20 January, 2011
Hahahahahah, this is great.

www.lookoutlanding.com
DJ CISC0 8:31 PM - 20 January, 2011
Quote:
Hahahahahah, this is great.

www.lookoutlanding.com

Yeah, read that when the deal went down. I'm still not sure why he went public with this though.
DVDjHardy 8:39 PM - 20 January, 2011
Quote:
Quote:

Hahahahahah, this is great.

www.lookoutlanding.com

Yeah, read that when the deal went down. I'm still not sure why he went public with this though.


So he can say, "I told you so".
DJ CISC0 8:41 PM - 20 January, 2011
^^^ Yeah, that's what I thought too but this can also back fire on him. He should've just kept his thoughts to himself. Or at least within the club.
lvmez 12:05 AM - 21 January, 2011
i think it's cool that he went public. in the past the yankees haven't complained about his moves(good or bad). like hardy said, he wants it known he wasn't on board.

it's obvious he makes the yanks better, cash was stuck on keeping draft pick.
slimmjimm 12:52 AM - 21 January, 2011
He kept his mouth shut because of George. I'm not so sure that he is scared of Hal and Hank, ya know, the guys who WEREN'T gonna get the team?
dj lad 9:07 AM - 22 January, 2011
The Rays just signed Manny and Damon. Millar is next!
slimmjimm 5:35 PM - 22 January, 2011
Quote:
The Rays just signed Manny and Damon. Millar is next!


And the Halos trade for V Wells and his huge contract, Moreno didn't want to pay for Crawford, but they're happy to pay the remainder of Wells' contract 4/86. That's dumber than the friggin Soriano deal IMO.
DJ CISC0 9:28 PM - 22 January, 2011
Quote:
The Rays just signed Manny and Damon. Millar is next!
Wow..talk about moving backwards. At this rate they might just end up worse than the O's.
DJ CISC0 9:43 PM - 22 January, 2011
Quote:
Quote:


The Rays just signed Manny and Damon. Millar is next!


And the Halos trade for V Wells and his huge contract, Moreno didn't want to pay for Crawford, but they're happy to pay the remainder of Wells' contract 4/86. That's dumber than the friggin Soriano deal IMO.
That's so dumb of them. I know the Blue Jays are relieved to finally get rid of that contract.
dj lad 9:49 AM - 23 January, 2011
Quote:
Quote:


The Rays just signed Manny and Damon. Millar is next!
Wow..talk about moving backwards. At this rate they might just end up worse than the O's.

Huh???

Look, they basically went from Crawford & Pena to Manny & Damon. It's not the worst move, honestly. They won 96 games last year. If Manny can give the Rays 3.5 WAR and Damon can give 2.5, they will be VERY well off. The big concern there is their bullpen.

They're probably an 85-90 win team right now, which isn't enough to overtake the Yankees or Red Sox.

Quote:
Quote:


Quote:




The Rays just signed Manny and Damon. Millar is next!


And the Halos trade for V Wells and his huge contract, Moreno didn't want to pay for Crawford, but they're happy to pay the remainder of Wells' contract 4/86. That's dumber than the friggin Soriano deal IMO.
That's so dumb of them. I know the Blue Jays are relieved to finally get rid of that contract.

THIS might be the dumbest thing ever by the Angels. Taking on an 85M contract for TWO productive players who will likely BOTH be at least as valuable as Wells. Kind of mindblowing.

Considering how well the Orioles played under Showalter (34-23, a .596 pct), there's a good chance that 5 of the 10 best teams in baseball are in the AL East. Kind of insane. Whoever comes out of this meatgrinder of a division is going to be PRIMED for the playoffs.
dj lad 9:55 AM - 23 January, 2011
From fangraphs.com (just so lvmez doesn't think I'm stealing):

Quote:
Top MLB hitters by OPS+, 2008-2010

1. Albert Pujols – 184
2. Manny Ramirez – 156


This shouldn't be taken lightly.

He's still a fucking FANTASTIC hitter. He'll outhit Pena's numbers as a full-time DH, make no mistake. Shit, it wouldn't shock me to see him put up .280/.380/.500 next year. He's going to hit, since he's literally one of the ten best HITTERS of all time.
lvmez 5:31 PM - 23 January, 2011
they are both injury prone as well. they are both dh's. damon is a horror show in the outfield.

might get some fans in the seats, that's about it.

i say manny hits 18 homers.
slimmjimm 8:09 PM - 23 January, 2011
I think I'll give Manny 25 hr, and 12 for Damon. I think the Rays made out pretty good, especially getting Manny for 2 mil. That's not a whole lot for a DH in the AL east, who is still pretty good in the box, which chowda loving dj lad so graciously pointed out.


I CAN'T FUCKING WAIT for baseball!!
dj lad 1:47 AM - 24 January, 2011
Manny is still a hitter. I suspect they both play less than 120 games, but if you can get 140 games of decent production for 7M, they'll be pretty well off.

Damon has never had much of an arm, but he's actually been pretty much neither negative nor positive in terms of defensive value 3 of the last 4 years. He'll fill in at DH some for Manny and in LF some of the other time. It's not a total bust.
DJ CISC0 3:27 AM - 24 January, 2011
OK, I was exaggerating when I said worse than the O's...I just thought the Rays would try to stay with a young team and focus on looking for pitching....but Manny for 2 mil is a good look....especially being back in the AL. Damon is still a good utility player so you cant go wrong with having him around.

The East is a crazy fucking division no doubt. It's gonna to be a fun year...can't wait.
DJ CISC0 6:52 PM - 26 January, 2011
Cashman has been on a roll lately with the media...Hints at moving DJ to the outfield?
www.nypost.com
dj lad 5:25 PM - 27 January, 2011
Cashman is an angry dude these days. I don't think he'll be back next season.
DJ CISC0 9:50 PM - 2 February, 2011
Add another aging former all star pitcher to the list for this spring.

bleacherreport.com
slimmjimm 11:38 PM - 2 February, 2011
Not mad.
dj lad 9:05 AM - 3 February, 2011
Welcome to 2003! Mark Prior! Bartolo Colon! Freddy Garcia!

Cmon.
slimmjimm 2:49 PM - 3 February, 2011
Quote:
Welcome to 2003! Mark Prior! Bartolo Colon! Freddy Garcia!

Cmon.



HELL YEAH!!!

Smotlz and Colon FTW!!!!!!

Oh wait
DVDjHardy 2:58 PM - 3 February, 2011
Nice work, Mickey Mantle --> www.lettersofnote.com
DJ CISC0 4:07 PM - 3 February, 2011
Quote:
Welcome to 2003! Mark Prior! Bartolo Colon! Freddy Garcia!

Cmon.

How funny would it be if one of these guys shut the Red Sox down this year?

Quote:
Nice work, Mickey Mantle --> www.lettersofnote.com

lmao...Mickey keeps it real.
uno seis 4:15 PM - 3 February, 2011
Quote:
Nice work, Mickey Mantle --> www.lettersofnote.com

HAHAHA
slimmjimm 6:13 AM - 4 February, 2011
And then there were three.

Thanks Andy, you will be missed.
dj lad 8:17 AM - 4 February, 2011
Quote:
Quote:


Welcome to 2003! Mark Prior! Bartolo Colon! Freddy Garcia!

Cmon.



HELL YEAH!!!

Smotlz and Colon FTW!!!!!!

Oh wait

To be clear, Colon was coming off two injury plagued seasons where he never had a chance to get healthy. And then made 7 starts, went 4-2 with a 3.98 ERA and a 1.39 WHIP. He was fine.

Smoltz was hurt for most of 2008 but still went 3-2 in 6 games (5 starts) and had 3 straight season before that with ERAs below 3.50.

Colon, Prior and Garcia have made a combined total of 28 starts in the majors or minors in 2010; all of them Garcia's.

The Yankees currently have Ivan Nova as their #4 pitcher. In those two seasons where Colon and Smoltz played for the Sox, the Sox had Matsuzaka and Wakefield/Buchholz has their #4 starters. There is a HUGE difference here, and if you don't get that, you're being foolish.
dj lad 8:18 AM - 4 February, 2011
Oh, and I FULLY expect Colon, Prior or Garcia to shut the Sox down at least once next year. Just like Kei Igawa did once.
dj lad 8:20 AM - 4 February, 2011
For the record, I don't think they're bad deals by the Yankees -- it's just funny that they basically signed a bunch of 2003 All-Stars. They got these guys for hella cheap and the Yankees can always move a prospect in May for a decent starter. But it's straight out of the Dan Duquette school of offseason signings.
DJ CISC0 4:39 PM - 4 February, 2011
Quote:
And then there were three.

Thanks Andy, you will be missed.

Honestly, I always had it down to 3 ever since he left to Houston. But yeah, he did a great job with the Yankees...on to the next one.

Quote:
it's just funny that they basically signed a bunch of 2003 All-Stars.
Yeah I found it to be a bit strange too but hey no one was really left after Lee signed.
dj lad 12:43 AM - 5 February, 2011
Well, that's not true.

Carl Pavano was available. So was Javy Vazquez.
slimmjimm 2:29 AM - 5 February, 2011
Quote:
Well, that's not true.

Carl Pavano was available. So was Javy Vazquez.



Please don't ever mention those names in this thread again.
dj lad 8:17 AM - 5 February, 2011
Hahaha, I just had to.
slimmjimm 2:03 PM - 5 February, 2011
BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Bucknaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!eleventybi
llion!!!!!!!!


There, now we're even. I feel better.
DJ CISC0 3:39 AM - 6 February, 2011
Quote:
Well, that's not true.

Carl Pavano was available. So was Javy Vazquez.
I cringed when I read this.

So Cano recently hired Scott Boras as his agent. I guess he's preparing to try and get some ARod money come 2013.
DJ CISC0 3:41 AM - 6 February, 2011
Quote:
BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Bucknaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!eleventybi
llion!!!!!!!!


There, now we're even. I feel better.


One of the funniest chokes in red sox history.
slimmjimm 7:22 PM - 6 February, 2011
Quote:
Quote:


Well, that's not true.

Carl Pavano was available. So was Javy Vazquez.
I cringed when I read this.

So Cano recently hired Scott Boras as his agent. I guess he's preparing to try and get some ARod money come 2013.


Man, I really liked Robbie too. Who else is in the farm?
tig ol' bitties 6:50 PM - 7 February, 2011
Red Sox > Yankees in 2011

This might be the worst year the AL East has seen in a while...

Rays are going to be awful...Orioles well arent even worth mentioning...Blue Jays will finish in their usual 3rd/4th place...

It will def be between the Yanks and Sox this year - I dont see the Yankees making the playoffs this year tho...CC cant pitch every game
lvmez 3:25 AM - 8 February, 2011
you guys are funny. redsox are better than the yankees on paper. they still have to play the season.

p.s. let's not forget injuries(that's the excuse the redsox fans used last year when they didn't make playoffs)
dj lad 5:12 AM - 8 February, 2011
Quote:
BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Buckner, BIll Bucknaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!eleventybi
llion!!!!!!!!


There, now we're even. I feel better.

I thought we were above trolling around here.
tig ol' bitties 9:02 PM - 8 February, 2011
Quote:
you guys are funny. redsox are better than the yankees on paper. they still have to play the season.

p.s. let's not forget injuries(that's the excuse the redsox fans used last year when they didn't make playoffs)


Losing Pedroia, Beckett, Youk, and Ellsbury is hardly an excuse lol
tig ol' bitties 9:03 PM - 8 February, 2011
Thats like the Yankees losing A-Rod, Jeter, Cano, and CC
DJ CISC0 11:21 PM - 8 February, 2011
Quote:
Red Sox > Yankees in 2011 I dont see the Yankees making the playoffs this year tho...

LOL...you say this every year.
lvmez 1:41 AM - 9 February, 2011
Quote:
Quote:

you guys are funny. redsox are better than the yankees on paper. they still have to play the season.

p.s. let's not forget injuries(that's the excuse the redsox fans used last year when they didn't make playoffs)


Losing Pedroia, Beckett, Youk, and Ellsbury is hardly an excuse lol


injuries are a part of the game. look at the green bay packers.

the point i was making is that baseball has to be played. no one is a lock. let's wait till mid season.
slimmjimm 4:12 AM - 9 February, 2011
Quote:

I thought we were above trolling around here.


We are, but you mentioned he who shall not be named, and the other bum who can't handle NY. That changes everything.
dj lad 5:09 AM - 9 February, 2011
Quote:
Quote:



I thought we were above trolling around here.


We are, but you mentioned he who shall not be named, and the other bum who can't handle NY. That changes everything.

Cmon, Pavano and Vazquez were mentioned as jokes.
dj lad 4:19 PM - 9 February, 2011
Russell Martin, Andruw Jones, Bartolo Colon, Freddy Garcia, Mark Prior, Ronnie Belliard, and Eric Chavez.

The Yankees are cornering the market on guys I thought had retired.
DJ CISC0 5:38 PM - 9 February, 2011
Relax lad it's only spring training invites... thats all.
DJ CISC0 7:14 PM - 9 February, 2011
Quote:
Russell Martin, Andruw Jones, Bartolo Colon, Freddy Garcia, Mark Prior, Ronnie Belliard, and Eric Chavez.

The Yankees are cornering the market on guys I thought had retired.

And the Red Sox signing the ex Yankee left overs bleacherreport.com
dj lad 8:51 PM - 10 February, 2011
You mean a 28 year old pitcher who's been injury plagued?

Oh, and all of those guys aren't ST invitees.... that's for sure.
dj lad 8:53 PM - 10 February, 2011
I don't think Aceves is anything special (his peripherals are not impressive, a low GB rate combined with a low BABIP is never a good mix), but at least he's not a washed up all-star from 2001.

<>
DJ CISC0 7:57 PM - 14 February, 2011
I hate to say this but Lad might be right about CC.
bleacherreport.com
dj lad 9:45 PM - 14 February, 2011
The thing is that he's saying all the right things: "No, I don't plan to, but the door is always open." He would NEVER say something like "Oh yeah, I'm definitely (not) going to opt out!" It would be dumb.
lvmez 1:02 AM - 15 February, 2011
no one else will give the money he is looking for. he is forgetting about how many innings he has pitched in the last few years. don't forget his weight issues. it won't be as easy as he thinks.

let's not jump the gun.
dj lad 1:44 AM - 15 February, 2011
That's fine. No one else will.

He can still opt out and make as much as Cliff Lee just by getting the Yankees to re-up him. The Yankees have, what, Phil Hughes as their #1 starter in 2012 if there's no CC? I don't see that happening.
DJ CISC0 2:13 AM - 15 February, 2011
If he does then he's going to get paid that's for sure. They also reported that he lost about 30 pounds so lets see what kind of season he has.
lvmez 12:36 PM - 15 February, 2011
lad, if you think that the yankees will not have another ace by 2012, then you really are delusional.
dj lad 6:37 PM - 15 February, 2011
Well, here's the problem:

Who's on the FA market -- Roy Oswalt & Chris Carpenter -- Oswalt will be in his age 34 season and Carpenter his 37.

In terms of big name pitchers who aren't FAs -- King Felix ain't going anywhere. Lincecum is the same.

I think the Yankees will have an ace in 2012, and it'll be Sabathia. He'll just have a new contract.
DJ CISC0 6:57 PM - 15 February, 2011
After a quick search I came across this list of FA for 2012 :

Starting Pitchers
Mark Buehrle CWS
Chris Carpenter STL *
Aaron Cook COL *
Kyle Davies KC
Zach Duke ARI
Edwin Jackson CWS
Scott Kazmir LAA *
Paul Maholm PIT
Jason Marquis WAS
Scott Olsen PIT *
Roy Oswalt PHI *
Oliver Perez NYM
Joel Pineiro LAA
Brian Tallet STL
Tim Wakefield BOS
C.J. Wilson TEX

Relief Pitchers
Danys Baez PHI
Matt Belisle COL
Heath Bell SD
Rafael Betancourt COL
Jonathan Broxton LAD
Tim Byrdak HOU
Shawn Camp TOR
Matt Capps MIN
Todd Coffey MIL
Clay Condrey MIN
Francisco Cordero CIN *
Lance Cormier TB
Ryan Franklin STL
Mike Gonzalez BAL
John Grabow CHC
LaTroy Hawkins MIL
Brad Lidge PHI *
Scott Linebrink ATL
Javier Lopez SF
Ryan Madson PHI
Damaso Marte NYY *
Sergio Mitre NYY
Joe Nathan MIN *
Jonathan Papelbon BOS
Chris Ray TEX
Francisco Rodriguez NYM *
George Sherrill ATL
Carlos Silva CHC *
Jose Valverde DET
Tyler Walker WAS
Michael Wuertz OAK
Joel Zumaya DET
dj lad 7:03 PM - 15 February, 2011
Right. Those starters are not an impressive list outside of Carpenter and Oswalt, who are both getting up there.

Also, from an ESPN.com article about CC:

"Sabathia, who had knee surgery this offseason, said he is 25 pounds lighter after he stopped eating full boxes of Cap'n Crunch. The 6-foot-7 Sabathia had reported to past camps well over 300 pounds. With the assist of a trainer and a chef, he has an eye on the future."

FULL BOXES OF CAP'N CRUNCH.
dj lad 7:05 PM - 15 February, 2011
Oh and:

Quote:
Mark Feinsand of the Daily News is citing a "source with knowledge" that CC is expected to exercise the opt-out after the season.
DJ CISC0 7:18 PM - 15 February, 2011
I love how the media loves to stir shit up for the Yankees every year right before the season starts. It never fails. They are the only team that goes through this every year.

Quote:
Oh and:
Quote:

Mark Feinsand of the Daily News is citing a "source with knowledge" that CC is expected to exercise the opt-out after the season.

I can't really buy into this because I doubt even CC knows what he really wants to do. It also depends on how he plays this year. I highly doubt that he'll opt out if he has a shitty or mediocre year (which I doubt will happen).
DJ CISC0 7:21 PM - 15 February, 2011
Quote:
FULL BOXES OF CAP'N CRUNCH.

Yeah I laughed when I read that too.
dj lad 7:37 PM - 15 February, 2011
I mean that's amazing he's ONLY 300 pounds.
lvmez 8:16 PM - 15 February, 2011
i'll take scott kazmir off that list. cc will have the same contract with an extension.
dj lad 9:59 PM - 15 February, 2011
Kazmir?

The guy with the 5.42 ERA the last two seasons? And the WHIP of 1.5 and has showed ZERO signs of improvement?

He was great a few years ago... not so much recently.
lvmez 10:57 PM - 15 February, 2011
he has shown he can pitch in the american league east. he is also a strike out pitcher. i would take a chance on him. his age is also a plus.
dj lad 2:24 AM - 16 February, 2011
He has shown in the past he could. There's a reason the Rays shipped him out of town, though. He'd be worth something like a 1 year / 5M contract probably at this point. He isn't the ace you'd be looking for.
DJ CISC0 2:41 AM - 16 February, 2011
I'll take Pabelbon off that list and send him straight to the minors just to make a mockery of him...lol
dj lad 6:31 AM - 16 February, 2011
I know you're kidding, but it doesn't work like that. You can't send a veteran to the minors without their permission; I think once a player has reached arbitration, they can't be sent down.
lvmez 12:34 PM - 16 February, 2011
the yankees will trade for another ace.
dj lad 5:18 PM - 16 February, 2011
Here's the issue there: Who?

King Felix isn't going anywhere. Lincecum, Cain, the same. Greinke was already traded once. Liriano? That's a possibility, but he's hurt so often and is rather inconsistent and has been AWFUL in the playoffs in his career (two games, but still). I don't think Wainwright is going anywhere. Josh Johnson just signed a long term extension IIRC. Jered Weaver? David Price (don't see the Rays moving him to the Yankees)? Ubaldo Jimenez just signed an extension. Cole Hamels isn't getting traded either.

There's only a handful of guys who I could possibly see being traded, but none of them have that "WOW!" factor: John Danks, Ervin Santana, Gavin Floyd.

Teams aren't giving up those young aces as readily as they were even as recently as 5 years ago - teams can resign them. It's possible (CC, Lee, Greinke, were all just traded after all), but relying on trades for pitching is a lot harder these days.
lvmez 8:12 PM - 16 February, 2011
is it possible for you to give me the lotto numbers for saturday on your crystal ball?
DJ CISC0 12:57 AM - 17 February, 2011
Quote:
I know you're kidding, but it doesn't work like that. You can't send a veteran to the minors without their permission; I think once a player has reached arbitration, they can't be sent down.
I was but it still doesnt mean that it cant happen. It'll be something like what Oliver Perez pulled last year with the Mets. I still think it'll be funny as hell though....


Quote:
King Felix isn't going anywhere..
You said this a few times already but I dont understand why you feel so strong on this.....I mean think about it. What are the Mariners really trying to prove in keeping him anyway? King Felix can't put the whole team on his back and carry them to a WS alone. And I'm also giving Ichiro 2-3 more years with them. They really dont have much after that. Dont you think that King Felix would like to play with a winning team anyway? I think he does.
DJ CISC0 12:58 AM - 17 February, 2011
Quote:
is it possible for you to give me the lotto numbers for saturday on your crystal ball?
They would bump Lad's research time to 18 hours a day...but it'll be worth it lol.
DJ CISC0 12:59 AM - 17 February, 2011
That*
dj lad 5:39 AM - 17 February, 2011
Quote:
Quote:


I know you're kidding, but it doesn't work like that. You can't send a veteran to the minors without their permission; I think once a player has reached arbitration, they can't be sent down.
I was but it still doesnt mean that it cant happen. It'll be something like what Oliver Perez pulled last year with the Mets. I still think it'll be funny as hell though....

They can go down with the player's permission. Perez never gave his permission to go down and therefore, he didn't go.

Quote:

King Felix isn't going anywhere..
You said this a few times already but I dont understand why you feel so strong on this.....I mean think about it. What are the Mariners really trying to prove in keeping him anyway? King Felix can't put the whole team on his back and carry them to a WS alone. And I'm also giving Ichiro 2-3 more years with them. They really dont have much after that. Dont you think that King Felix would like to play with a winning team anyway? I think he does.
There was a chance the Sox were going to acquire Felix at the 08 trade deadline; they would have had to give up (reportedly) Daniel Bard, Clay Buchholz, Justin Masterson, Nick Hagadone, Michael Bowden and Felix Doubront, shortstop Yamaico Navarro and outfielder Josh Reddick. That would have been a HUGE amount and something that even the Yankees would be hesitant to give up (plus they don't have major league ready players like Bard, Buchholz, Masterson, Doubront, and Reddick).

Felix could very well sign as a FA, but a trade? Unlikely unless the Yankees give up basically everything in their system, something that Cashman has been VERY hesitant to do in the last few years (and he's not a FA until 2015). The Mariners have him locked up until then at a reasonable cost -- 15.6M a year through 2014. Now, why would the Mariners, who are cash rich and in no position to give up a talent like Felix unless they're getting back a literal "King's Ransom" (see what I did there)? They're keeping him because they're in a weak division where the Rangers don't look that strong and with a few better offensive players, they could easily compete.
slimmjimm 2:18 PM - 17 February, 2011
Lad,

Although I somewhat agree on your assessment of Felix and the M's, I'd like to point out your last sentence and refresh your memory back just on year ago

Quote:
They're keeping him because they're in a weak division where the Rangers don't look that strong and with a few better offensive players, they could easily compete.


I doubt they are going to find the offense and pitching like they had last year, and they didn't do shit with that.

Yankees now have a top 5 farm, and could easily put together a package for Felix. 2008 is over, 2011 is here and Seattle has to think about paying him sooner and sooner. They might as well get a few players instead of a shitty pick.
lvmez 3:19 PM - 17 February, 2011
i'm not saying he will be traded to yankees, but i do think he will be traded sooner than later.
DJ CISC0 5:05 PM - 17 February, 2011
+1 jimm


*sidenote* @ Hardy- whats up with your boy Miguel Cabrera? This dude is a big problem for the Tigers. Dude's a clown.

sports.espn.go.com
slimmjimm 6:05 PM - 17 February, 2011
Just read about Cabrera, he's obviously got problems he can't get past, it's a shame, he has got huge talent.
DVDjHardy 6:54 PM - 17 February, 2011
Cabrera is like lvmez of the Tigers. Plus he has talent.
lvmez 7:38 PM - 17 February, 2011
Quote:
Cabrera is like lvmez of the Tigers. Plus he has talent.


? i'm not on the tigers?

Hardy isn't a tigers fan, he jumped on the Rangers bandwagon. who knows about next year.
DVDjHardy 7:40 PM - 17 February, 2011
^See what I mean?
lvmez 8:23 PM - 17 February, 2011
you belong in the general "mlb" thread since your undecided. there is nothing wrong with that. new season coming up, you have your choice of team. then again you will probably want to wait who makes the playoffs first before you jump ship again.
dj lad 10:58 PM - 17 February, 2011
Quote:
Lad,

Although I somewhat agree on your assessment of Felix and the M's, I'd like to point out your last sentence and refresh your memory back just on year ago

Quote:

They're keeping him because they're in a weak division where the Rangers don't look that strong and with a few better offensive players, they could easily compete.

I doubt they are going to find the offense and pitching like they had last year, and they didn't do shit with that.

Yankees now have a top 5 farm, and could easily put together a package for Felix. 2008 is over, 2011 is here and Seattle has to think about paying him sooner and sooner. They might as well get a few players instead of a shitty pick.

Here's the thing about the Mariners - they have VERY deep pockets. They can afford to keep Felix on the roster. Remember, they're owned by Nintendo. They've paid out at least 87M a year since 2005 and that streak doesn't look to be stopping any time soon. Last year their offense was anemic and their pitching wasn't much better. They could very easily turn things around a little bit and be right back in it in the AL West (shit, look at their 2009 season for evidence).

Giving up Felix before 2014 would be monumentally dumb by the Mariners unless they got back an INSANE haul (like 8 prospects, including 5 who were major league ready) -- and that kind of haul is something the Yankees simply don't have available at this time. Montero, Romine (maybe), Brackman (maybe), Noesi, and Nova are pretty much the five guys closest to (or in) the majors right now in the Yankee system. And while Montero likely won't stick as a catcher, I don't think the Mariners need 2 catchers in a trade. I could be wrong, though.

Also, I don't agree with the Yankees having a top 5 farm assessment. Top 10, probably, but as soon as Montero goes to the majors, it will drop quite a bit (I do believe he's THAT good, btw). They've got a lot of talent, but not a lot of "star" talent -- mostly its depth -- #4 starters, good 3rd outfielders, etc. That's still very valuable, but outside of Montero, they don't have that HUGE talented player in their system that could have impact in the next two seasons (although Dellin Betances certainly COULD be that guy).
DVDjHardy 11:09 PM - 17 February, 2011
Quote:
you belong in the general "mlb" thread since your undecided. there is nothing wrong with that. new season coming up, you have your choice of team. then again you will probably want to wait who makes the playoffs first before you jump ship again.


In case you don't get it, my rooting interests are like this:

1. Tigers.
2. Anyone playing against the Yankees.

PS - Watchwww.youtube.com
lvmez 2:00 AM - 18 February, 2011
your too easy bro. doesn't take much to put you over the edge. you must watch tiger games with your teddy bear.
slimmjimm 4:39 AM - 18 February, 2011
I was just reading a few more articles on Cabrera, I didn't realize dude is only 27, hopefully he can get himself cleaned up.
dj lad 9:12 AM - 18 February, 2011
Quote:
I was just reading a few more articles on Cabrera, I didn't realize dude is only 27, hopefully he can get himself cleaned up.

I know, right?

He's probably the best pure hitter since Manny (or Pujols) and there's a chance he's out of baseball because of his weight and booze in 3 years. It sucks. Looking all players in baseball history, from their age 20 through age 27 seasons, Cabrera ranks 11th ALL TIME in homers, right behind Hank Aaron and since integration, he ranks 9th in OPS+ (6th in OPS) over that same span.

I really hope he gets his shit together because the dude can hit.
DJ CISC0 3:37 AM - 2 March, 2011
WTF...looks like getting hit in the head is the in thing this spring training...

sports.espn.go.com

www.nypost.com
slimmjimm 2:56 PM - 2 April, 2011
It's been a month since anyone posted in here?
dj lad 10:39 PM - 3 April, 2011
Sox are gonna go 158-4.
DJ CISC0 3:36 AM - 4 April, 2011
LOL ! Sox are 0-3 and the Yanks win their opening series against the Tigers (sorry Hardy)....I say it's a good start so far.

Orioles start the season 3-0...go figure.
DVDjHardy 4:12 AM - 4 April, 2011
I was only able to watch part of today's game because of gigs and what not. But the right field at Yankee Stadium is a joke. It looks like a beer-league baseball game when I watch games being played there with a ton of home runs that would be outs in 29 other parks.
dj lad 7:05 AM - 4 April, 2011
I'll be more worried if the Red Sox are 0-10.
lvmez 11:58 AM - 4 April, 2011
Quote:
I was only able to watch part of today's game because of gigs and what not. But the right field at Yankee Stadium is a joke. It looks like a beer-league baseball game when I watch games being played there with a ton of home runs that would be outs in 29 other parks.


it's the same situation at fenway. pesky pole is 302 ft and yankee stadium is 314 ft. redsox will hit a ton of homers this year.

p.s. what's with Terry Francona dropping crawford to 7th hole after two games?
dj lad 1:28 AM - 5 April, 2011
There's a big difference, lvmez. The Pesky Pole is close, but it IMMEDIATELY shoots out to 360 feet or so. Not so much at Yankee Stadium where it's short all the way.

In fact, here's both stadiums laid out over each other, just to, once again, show you how wrong you are about something.

www.hittrackeronline.com

Francona thought Crawford was putting too much pressure on himself, dropped him to 7th. He'll be back up in the lineup again very soon.
DJ CISC0 2:22 AM - 5 April, 2011
I just got back from tonight's game...Took my 5 year old daughter to her first game. First HR off of ARod was to left...lol....Right field looked fine to me when Jorge homered too.

I can't believe you guys are still not over the Right field drama....I thought last year put an end to all the speculation.
DJ CISC0 2:53 AM - 5 April, 2011
Oh yeah, the hot dogs fell the hell off this year WTF? 14 dollars for 2 hotdogs that tasted like hell.
dj lad 2:56 AM - 5 April, 2011
Quote:
I just got back from tonight's game...Took my 5 year old daughter to her first game. First HR off of ARod was to left...lol....Right field looked fine to me when Jorge homered too.

I can't believe you guys are still not over the Right field drama....I thought last year put an end to all the speculation.

What, that I'm always right and lvmez is always wrong? :)

As for the hot dogs...when you have a stadium that cost 400 billion to build, you should be happy to pay $7 a dog, heh.
DJ CISC0 3:05 AM - 5 April, 2011
Actually, it was 6 a dog with a 2 dollar tip....But I see where you're trying to go with it. But, the $11.50 steak sandwich was the shit tho...I'm happy to contribute.
lvmez 3:11 AM - 5 April, 2011
Quote:
Quote:

I just got back from tonight's game...Took my 5 year old daughter to her first game. First HR off of ARod was to left...lol....Right field looked fine to me when Jorge homered too.

I can't believe you guys are still not over the Right field drama....I thought last year put an end to all the speculation.

What, that I'm always right and lvmez is always wrong? :)

As for the hot dogs...when you have a stadium that cost 400 billion to build, you should be happy to pay $7 a dog, heh.



still losing sleep. nothing changes. i hope you slept all winter. we all know your up all night studying charts. lol.
dj lad 5:57 PM - 5 April, 2011
What's it like to always be wrong, lvmez? Always?
dj lad 5:59 PM - 5 April, 2011
Quote:
Actually, it was 6 a dog with a 2 dollar tip....But I see where you're trying to go with it. But, the $11.50 steak sandwich was the shit tho...I'm happy to contribute.

I was just busting your chops. It's damn expensive at Fenway -- and at the Nationals Park here in DC. I bought a round of four Jameson shots at Nationals Park once and it was $70 plus tip or something. They totally break you at all these ballparks.
DVDjHardy 6:07 PM - 5 April, 2011
Quote:
Quote:


Actually, it was 6 a dog with a 2 dollar tip....But I see where you're trying to go with it. But, the $11.50 steak sandwich was the shit tho...I'm happy to contribute.

I was just busting your chops. It's damn expensive at Fenway -- and at the Nationals Park here in DC. I bought a round of four Jameson shots at Nationals Park once and it was $70 plus tip or something. They totally break you at all these ballparks.


Still cheaper than a lot of clubs that I've been to. $20-30 drinks at Marquee in Vegas. `
lvmez 9:50 PM - 5 April, 2011
@lad:

is peskey pole in fair territory? YES it is.

is pesky pole shorter distance than yankee stadium? YES

did i ever mention the entire right field? NO(i mentioned that they both have short right fields)

your ASSuming again what i was trying to say.
dj lad 6:33 AM - 6 April, 2011
Quote:
@lad:

is peskey pole in fair territory? YES it is.

is pesky pole shorter distance than yankee stadium? YES

did i ever mention the entire right field? NO(i mentioned that they both have short right fields)

your ASSuming again what i was trying to say.

You're just stupid. It's okay.
lvmez 1:37 PM - 6 April, 2011
good comeback, you must be tired from reading stats.
DJ CISC0 7:03 PM - 6 April, 2011
OK technically, Fenway has a shorter right, center and left field...there you have it. Say it aint so Lad.
slimmjimm 8:41 PM - 6 April, 2011
Quote:
good comeback, you must be tired from reading stats.



Like this one? www.boston.com
dj lad 10:10 PM - 6 April, 2011
Quote:
OK technically, Fenway has a shorter right, center and left field...there you have it. Say it aint so Lad.

That's a silly argument considering the height of the fences.

www.hittrackeronline.com

Quote:
Quote:


good comeback, you must be tired from reading stats.



Like this one? www.boston.com

It's a pretty misleading stat. Most teams that start 0-4 aren't considered contenders in the first place to win a World Series or even a division. It's a dumb stat.
dj lad 10:18 PM - 6 April, 2011
Quote:
good comeback, you must be tired from reading stats.

By the way, your anti-intellectual bullshit is tired.
lvmez 10:23 PM - 6 April, 2011
Quote:
Quote:


OK technically, Fenway has a shorter right, center and left field...there you have it. Say it aint so Lad.

That's a silly argument considering the height of the fences.

www.hittrackeronline.com

Quote:


Quote:




good comeback, you must be tired from reading stats.



Like this one? www.boston.com

It's a pretty misleading stat. Most teams that start 0-4 aren't considered contenders in the first place to win a World Series or even a division. It's a dumb stat.



so now you don't agree with stats? damm bro, talk about going back and forth.

and height of fences?
dj lad 10:25 PM - 6 April, 2011
I never said I agree with all stats.

You know what's a stupid stat? Errors. You know what's another? Looking at 4 or 5 games and extrapolating it to a season. You know what's another? Using just distance to gauge difficulty of hitting a home run.

There are good stats and there are bad ones. This isn't difficult.
lvmez 11:44 PM - 6 April, 2011
i agree.

just funny how you didn't disagree with hardy but jumped all over my statement.
dj lad 11:50 PM - 6 April, 2011
Um, he's right though. It's a joke. While the corner is closer at Fenway, most of right field certainly is not.
dj lad 11:51 PM - 6 April, 2011
Moreover, he never once mentioned the pole. I agreed with his statement.

GOOD READING AS PER USUAL.
DJ CISC0 7:32 PM - 7 April, 2011
Quote:
I'll be more worried if the Red Sox are 0-10.
0-6...Almost there! Worst start since 1945.

It's on this weekend tho.
lvmez 8:17 PM - 7 April, 2011
i actually wanted them to win today. they are due for a few wins. and it might be against the yankees.
slimmjimm 11:05 PM - 7 April, 2011
Quote:
Quote:


I'll be more worried if the Red Sox are 0-10.
0-6...Almost there! Worst start since 1945.

It's on this weekend tho.



WORD!!!!!!
DJ CISC0 11:27 PM - 8 April, 2011
WOW! Manny retires! Tested positive again.....Anyone shocked?
sports.espn.go.com
DJ CISC0 11:31 PM - 8 April, 2011
Like I said before they should put an asterisk next to those 2 Red Sox WS wins.
lvmez 11:53 PM - 8 April, 2011
Quote:
Like I said before they should put an asterisk next to those 2 Red Sox WS wins.


then they would have to put an asterisk next to the last 10 world series winners. every team has a few users.
slimmjimm 1:24 AM - 9 April, 2011
Quote:
WOW! Manny retires! Tested positive again.....Anyone shocked?
sports.espn.go.com


He really is just fucking fixed gear. At least we don't have to deal with seeing his sloppy dressing skills.



Also, I'm totally pissed about missing the game today, I thought it was on at 7:05 and planned my day accordingly. What asshole schedules a Yanks/Sox game at 2:05 on a Friday?
dj lad 10:55 PM - 9 April, 2011
Quote:
Quote:


Like I said before they should put an asterisk next to those 2 Red Sox WS wins.


then they would have to put an asterisk next to the last 10 world series winners. every team has a few users.

Jesus we agree on something.

Last 10 would be generous -- last 30 is more like it.
dj lad 10:55 PM - 9 April, 2011
For every one player that gets caught there's another 50 that don't. When I lived in Boston I knew an ex ballplayer through my job and he just laughed about the steroid testing and how piss poor it was and how easily it could be avoided.
dj lad 11:16 PM - 9 April, 2011
BTW yesterday's Red Sox-Yankees game was the PERFECT example of why using W-L record is stupid to judge a pitcher.

Lackey was AWFUL and got the win. Colon was really quite good and got the loss.
lvmez 11:24 PM - 9 April, 2011
good win today for yankees.
dj lad 12:52 AM - 10 April, 2011
It was. The Red Sox pitching looks awful, and it's not because they are letting random base-hits through. It's all because of homers and walks, the two biggest red flags for a pitcher in terms of them not being unlucky.

I suspect it's just small sample size and things will even out by October, but it's certainly not an auspicious start.
DJ CISC0 3:37 AM - 11 April, 2011
Quote:
Quote:


Like I said before they should put an asterisk next to those 2 Red Sox WS wins.


then they would have to put an asterisk next to the last 10 world series winners. every team has a few users.
I was trying to bait lad into a fun debate to bust his chops but yeah I really agree with that though...Our game that we love has been tainted for years now. I dont know what to believe now.

Anyway, tonight was the first full game I seen this year and it was a good one for the Sox. Even tho they should've blown us out but they left a bunch of runners on base. CC looked tired early and JB looked like his old self tonight...I think this was his KK high against the Yanks too.

That play against Yook early in the game (when they moved the runners back and took away the run) was strange...I don't think I ever seen that before.

It was also great to finally watch an ESPN game without "know it all" Joe Morgan, who always seems to relate everything with his Reds days. And Jon Miller screaming after routine pop ups. I actually like this crew this year. They even kept it real regarding the Manny thing. I think Bobby V even called Manny stupid lol....something the old crew wouldn't have even brought up let alone talk about how they really felt.
lvmez 1:57 PM - 11 April, 2011
I don't understand Ken Rosenthal (who i think is a good reporter), he said he will not vote for Manny to get into hall but will vote for Mark McGwire.

what is he talking about? anyone on the list should not get in. all or nothing.
DJ CISC0 2:59 PM - 11 April, 2011
Yeah, I heard that too and said to myself HUH? He also said he would vote for Bonds too.
dj lad 4:11 PM - 11 April, 2011
That was Olney who said that, not Rosenthal.

See, I don't believe that the game is tainted. It's just changed. If you accept that guys forty years ago were using what is now a banned substance (greenies), then it's really easy to just move on from the debate.
lvmez 6:59 PM - 11 April, 2011
it was rosenthal during the game on fox.
dj lad 7:33 PM - 11 April, 2011
Ahhh. Olney said something similar last night as well. Apologies!
uno seis 7:36 PM - 11 April, 2011
was it me or was joe buck in extra bad form during the game saturday?
DJ CISC0 8:28 PM - 11 April, 2011
I caught some of Saturday's game and laughed when I heard Buck praising Aceves when he came in. He's always been a Yankee hater so now Aceves has a Sox uniform and NOW he's giving him his props...he's an idiot.
dj lad 9:02 PM - 11 April, 2011
It's funny: Red Sox fans think he hates the Red Sox and Yankee fans think he hates the Yankees.

I suspect it's neither.
slimmjimm 9:02 PM - 11 April, 2011
Quote:
That was Olney who said that, not Rosenthal.

See, I don't believe that the game is tainted. It's just changed. If you accept that guys forty years ago were using what is now a banned substance (greenies), then it's really easy to just move on from the debate.


I agree with the changed part to an extent. It was not illegal now it is. Manny was banned over + tests in the illegal era (he get's really knocked out of the equation for being dumb 2x)
slimmjimm 9:03 PM - 11 April, 2011
Banned = suspended
dj lad 11:34 PM - 11 April, 2011
Yeah, it wasn't legal, but it was still stimulant use.

I agree that things have changed and it's different -- but guys have tried to whatever they could for a very long time to try and get ahead -- Babe Ruth thought injecting himself with sheep testosterone would be a good thing for his career.

I'm of the mind that all substances should be legal. If you want to harm your health, feel free. Plenty of guys won't do that.
lvmez 11:42 PM - 11 April, 2011
i disagree. most will inject themselves. the money that is being paid out is no comparison to 10-20-30 years ago. most think it would be worth it.

manny is perfect example: has about 200 million in his career and still feels the need to inject himself.
slimmjimm 4:26 PM - 14 April, 2011
Burnett now has more wins than the Sawx. Discuss.
DJ CISC0 8:42 PM - 14 April, 2011
Quote:
Burnett now has more wins than the Sawx. Discuss.

LOL....The Sox also have the worst record in baseball....Discuss.
dj lad 10:29 PM - 14 April, 2011
Yikes.
lvmez 12:53 AM - 15 April, 2011
it's early guys. lots of baseball left.
DJ CISC0 3:29 AM - 15 April, 2011
Quote:
it's early guys. lots of baseball left.
It's never too early to bust on the Sox...3rd highest payroll in baseball (only 30 mil less than the Yanks) and they only won 2 games so far. But I agree, its early but still...not a good look right now.
lvmez 12:01 PM - 15 April, 2011
very true. even pedroia made comment about the sox pitching. one thing i have to say is that the east doesn't look good this year. besides the yankees and bosox, no one else is going to contend.

the yankees pitching is scaring me a little. if it wasn't for the offense we would be in trouble.
dj lad 4:06 PM - 15 April, 2011
It is a weak year in the AL, and yes it's early.

Fun fact: both big contracts that the Sox gave out this offseason (and season) in Crawford and Gonzalez have clauses in them that allow the Red Sox to block any trade to the Yankees.
slimmjimm 5:13 PM - 16 April, 2011
What's fun about that? Isn't that a no trade clause? A scrub 5/10 player could do the same.

See also: Why in the fuck would the Sox trade anybody to the Yankees?
dj lad 10:03 PM - 16 April, 2011
No, you don't get it.

Let's say it's 2016 and half the team is hurt (it's like 2010!) and Gonzalez is still effective but not worth his contract anymore. They trade him to the contending Las Vegas Rollers (moved from Oakland) where he has a resurgence, a 1.200 OPS over the last 2+ months. However, his contract is too big for them to keep for the 2017 season.

Because Mark Teixiera has died of complications due to a combination of chlamydia and equine AIDS, the Yankees now need a first baseman... but the Red Sox can block that trade to the Yankees.

It's mostly gamesmanship and for show, but it's unique.
dj lad 10:04 PM - 16 April, 2011
FYI: the last trade the Sox and Yankees made was for, I believe, Mike Stanley. Tony Armas came back to the Sox, who was included in the trade the Sox made for Pedro.
slimmjimm 10:41 PM - 16 April, 2011
I actually got it after I posted, but the absence of an edit button kept my post there for posterity, but thanks for the chuckle.

Hey, the Sox won today too!
dj lad 7:43 AM - 17 April, 2011
YAY! 3-10!!

(shoots self in face)
slimmjimm 3:51 PM - 17 April, 2011
Quote:
YAY! 3-10!!

(shoots self in face)



I'm all with the "it's a long season" people, but I just wonder when it's officially an ok time to say WTF? They're only 5 out of first (Yankees!!!), but when does it really become a major problem? Similar record over 20 games 1/8, or 40 for 1/4 season?
dj lad 6:54 PM - 17 April, 2011
Well, the major problem with the Sox is that NOTHING is working. They're hitting horribly, pitching horribly, playing bad defense, and running into outs on the bases.

Things, really, can only get better.
DJ CISC0 10:46 PM - 17 April, 2011
Quote:

I'm all with the "it's a long season" people, but I just wonder when it's officially an ok time to say WTF? They're only 5 out of first (Yankees!!!), but when does it really become a major problem? Similar record over 20 games 1/8, or 40 for 1/4 season?
Well, Francona seems to be worrying since he benched Crawford.

On a side note...can you imagine what Pujols will be making after seeing what the Sox just dropped on Gonzalez?
DJ CISC0 10:51 PM - 17 April, 2011
Quote:
Quote:
I can't wait for Crawford to bomb next year so Gonzalez can come in with his rape price that the red sox WILL pay.


Do you really think Crawford will bomb? Honest question.
He's doing a pretty good job at bombing right now.
slimmjimm 1:38 AM - 18 April, 2011
Quote:
Quote:
I'm all with the "it's a long season" people, but I just wonder when it's officially an ok time to say WTF? They're only 5 out of first (Yankees!!!), but when does it really become a major problem? Similar record over 20 games 1/8, or 40 for 1/4 season?
Well, Francona seems to be worrying since he benched Crawford.

On a side note...can you imagine what Pujols will be making after seeing what the Sox just dropped on Gonzalez?



I'll take A Rod money for 27.5mm per, Alex.
dj lad 5:10 AM - 18 April, 2011
Gonzalez is a way better hitter than you're giving him credit for.

His career home/road split is .798 OPS at home, .943 on the road. Give him Fenway and let him keep up that .943 on the road and we're looking at a guy that could very easily put up .975-1.000 for the next five years. He's only 29 this year.

He's absolutely worth the contract he got.

FTR, there's a difference between "benching" and "giving a guy who's struggling a day off". Francona isn't benching Crawford. He's giving him days off to try to figure out why he's in such a funk. Crawford isn't getting benched any time soon.
lvmez 1:25 PM - 18 April, 2011
Nice win for Yankees yesterday. Pitching is struggling. If the pitching turns around and the offense keeps it up, we will be in good shape. Just good to win the series from a good team.
DJ CISC0 8:25 PM - 18 April, 2011
No one said he wasn't a good hitter lad....but IMO he's not 22M/yr good though. But it doesn't matter though because the Sox got money to splurge on players now. I guess they're trying to buy a championship too huh?

LOL...Dude, spin it which ever way you want...Crawford got benched so he can figure out this funk he's in. I personally think it was a bad move to "give him a few days off" so early in the season. He needed to stay in the lineup and just work it out. Giving "days off" to someone when they are in a funk can mess with their mind and he could come back the same or even worse...IDK.
dj lad 2:28 AM - 19 April, 2011
CISC0, he's an very good defender and elite hitter with power to all fields. He's going to have a .950+ OPS over the next five years who has shown a propensity to stay healthy.

Fangraphs had him valued at $21.1M last year, $29.3M in 09, and $17.2 in 08. He's absolutely worth that contract.
lvmez 2:37 AM - 19 April, 2011
hey lad can you list ALL the websites you use as references? not trying to be funny, i'm just curious to see what your looking at.

it seems like you don't have your own opinion on anything unless you read it on a website. once again not dissing you or starting an arguement.
DJ CISC0 2:55 AM - 19 April, 2011
One of the sites he uses (because I asked him this a while ago) is Baseball Reference. So look at where Gonzalez is at based on BF's "Aged Based Similar Players". So compare him to say Paul Konerko or Derrek Lee. So I guess these guys deserved 22M/yr too?

www.baseball-reference.com
dj lad 4:49 AM - 19 April, 2011
Quote:
One of the sites he uses (because I asked him this a while ago) is Baseball Reference. So look at where Gonzalez is at based on BF's "Aged Based Similar Players". So compare him to say Paul Konerko or Derrek Lee. So I guess these guys deserved 22M/yr too?

www.baseball-reference.com

BR's players by age is pretty flawed, partially because it doesn't take ballpark into consideration. Gonzalez has been putting up excellent road numbers while hitting decently enough at home as well. But for Lee's 29-33 age seasons (5 years), he put up a .938 OPS. Konerko hit .865, but also keep in mind that in the top five seasons put up by Konerko and Gonzalez, 4 of them have been by Gonzalez (and Konerko's been playing a LOT longer).

I think that Gonzalez is worth the money the Red Sox are paying him in the sense that he's only 29 and one of the ten best hitters in baseball while playing very good to elite defense. When putting it that way, he's absolutely worth 22M a year, even if when he's 36, he's fallen off. Pay for production now and deal with the money of the latter years later on.

Quote:
hey lad can you list ALL the websites you use as references? not trying to be funny, i'm just curious to see what your looking at.

it seems like you don't have your own opinion on anything unless you read it on a website. once again not dissing you or starting an arguement.

My arguments grow out of interpreting intelligent statistics, not the fluff of wins, batting average and errors. I don't read Baseball Think Factory or Baseball Prospectus or any of those kind of sites. Mostly I read a lot about Sabermetrics, either on Tom Tango's site or on Fangraphs. Fangraphs has emerged as a GREAT resource in the last few years, surpassing B-R or BP in my mind. I've got a subscription to Bill James' website and I've got a stack of baseball books.

It's really not hard to look deeper into the "other" numbers of baseball. It's constantly changing. Five years ago, Range Factor was considered a great metric and now it's considered trash (to be fair though, fielding metrics are by FAR the hardest ones to judge). WAR, WPA, wOBA, RAR and things like that are always being re-evaluated, but they're still way more informative than something even like OPS.

It's not all about stats, though. An example: it's been shown that generally speaking, lineups don't matter. Placing batters wherever in the lineup has shown to have zero effect on a teams ability to produce runs. Of course, that's all in the numbers. In reality, these are people. Some guys don't like hitting cleanup. Some guys don't like hitting leadoff. There's obviously a human side to all of this that gets ignored by "stat guys" sometimes.
dj lad 5:34 AM - 19 April, 2011
It's like DJing. You watch enough DMCs, you practice, and you think critically about what you're doing for long enough and you are able to DJ with a lot more ease and skill. You read a lot about sabermetrics, you look at numbers and you make a point to try to come up with your own arguments and eventually you are able to do that in a cogent and reasonable way.
slimmjimm 5:08 PM - 19 April, 2011
Quote:


........ng. Five years ago, Range Factor was considered a great metric and now it's considered trash (to be fair though, fielding metrics are by FAR the hardest ones to judge). WAR, WPA, wOBA, RAR and things like that are always being re-evaluated, but they're still way more informative than something even like OPS.........



Didn't you just quote OPS for AGon?


And the range factor thing, why is it always brought up against Jeter, but now it's a garbage stat?

Note: I'm not a Jeter nutswinger, most yanks fans know he's gotten worse, I'm just curious on how you say now it's considered "trash" when you bring it up for your case against Jete?


BTW, congrats on your team being halfway to .500!
dj lad 5:31 PM - 19 April, 2011
No one uses range factor against Jeter. Maybe they did back then. And a broken clock is still right twice a day, since it showed he's an awful defender and every metric SINCE then has showed that as well. It's funny, I just searched this thread and two YEARS ago I mentioned range factor and said it's a weak stat.

People use things like UZR and UZR/150 mostly, but they're not perfect either. Still, he's been awful for a decade as a defender and that's pretty obvious using any metric.

Using OPS is a quick and dirty evaluator. It gives you an okay idea of what a guy is doing. It's better than average, OBP or SLG on their own. And it's not scary to the casual fan. In reality, OBP is about 3x more important than SLG. But it's hard to work that into your basic stat analysis.

As for the halfway to .500 crack, thanks.
DJ CISC0 6:29 PM - 19 April, 2011
Quote:
Quote:
One of the sites he uses (because I asked him this a while ago) is Baseball Reference. So look at where Gonzalez is at based on BF's "Aged Based Similar Players". So compare him to say Paul Konerko or Derrek Lee. So I guess these guys deserved 22M/yr too?

www.baseball-reference.com

BR's players by age is pretty flawed, partially because it doesn't take ballpark into consideration.

You're kidding me right? Seriously, now you say that BR stats are "pretty flawed"? That's a major flip flopping statement considering you used their stats to try and prove your points in the past. So if you want to factor in ballparks then your point about Gonzalez being a great player on the road is pretty flawed also right? I mean, he must of had his favorite/worst park to hit on the road right?
dj lad 8:36 PM - 19 April, 2011
Dude.

I didn't say BR's stats are flawed. I said their "best player comparison" is flawed.

I will continue to use plenty of their other stats, as I have in the past. Because, well, it's math (although BR and FG use different methods to calculate WAR). Math doesn't change. The formulas do.

Not adjusting for park effects is a flaw. A guy who has a .900 OPS playing half their games in Chavez Ravine is more impressive than a guy who has a .900 OPS playing half their games in Kauffman Stadium. It's really that simple.
dj lad 8:42 PM - 19 April, 2011
As for the second part, the idea is that over a season (or a few seasons), you can get a good idea of a player's neutral stats by looking a lot at their road numbers. Plenty of players are helped or hurt dramatically by their home parks. The idea that playing 10 games at a road park (max in a season for most teams) can somehow counterbalance playing 81 in your home park is just silly.
dj lad 8:46 PM - 19 April, 2011
BTW, this is a good piece to reference about sample sizes: www.fangraphs.com

The idea is that the author looked at a certain stat and determined at what point did it stabilize (ie not have large enough fluctuations).
slimmjimm 9:18 PM - 19 April, 2011
Quote:
No one uses range factor against Jeter. Maybe they did back then. And a broken clock is still right twice a day, since it showed he's an awful defender and every metric SINCE then has showed that as well. It's funny, I just searched this thread and two YEARS ago I mentioned range factor and said it's a weak stat.

People use things like UZR and UZR/150 mostly, but they're not perfect either. Still, he's been awful for a decade as a defender and that's pretty obvious using any metric.

Using OPS is a quick and dirty evaluator. It gives you an okay idea of what a guy is doing. It's better than average, OBP or SLG on their own. And it's not scary to the casual fan. In reality, OBP is about 3x more important than SLG. But it's hard to work that into your basic stat analysis.

As for the halfway to .500 crack, thanks.



Sorry Lad, you did mention it was a garbage stat in '09, usually you have such a hard on for quoting some weird ass stat I got confused.
dj lad 2:09 AM - 20 April, 2011
It's okay. I'm usually right around here, you guys just need to finally all realize that. :)
DJ CISC0 2:30 AM - 20 April, 2011
Please, if the Sox had a Jeter, he would've been a god over there...just like they were trying to make Nomar out to be and we all saw how that turned out.

See, I told you lad was the Rain Man of stats....That's going to drive you crazy bro. No offense but...I wish I had more time throughout the day to look up and compare these stats more so I can come back with a little more.

Quote:
It's okay. I'm usually right around here, you guys just need to finally all realize that. :)
Right! Just like your predictions about CC blowing his arm out, Cano being back to his lazy ways, and pretty much the Yankees in general right?
dj lad 2:57 AM - 20 April, 2011
Quote:
Please, if the Sox had a Jeter, he would've been a god over there...just like they were trying to make Nomar out to be and we all saw how that turned out.

See, I told you lad was the Rain Man of stats....That's going to drive you crazy bro. No offense but...I wish I had more time throughout the day to look up and compare these stats more so I can come back with a little more.

No doubt. If the Red Sox had Jeter, I'd love him. But he'd still be a shit defender. The thing is that I spend about 5 minutes looking this up. It's really easy to find this stuff out.

Quote:
Quote:
It's okay. I'm usually right around here, you guys just need to finally all realize that. :)
Right! Just like your predictions about CC blowing his arm out, Cano being back to his lazy ways, and pretty much the Yankees in general right?

I hit on Jeter, Burnett, Wang, missed on Joba in a BIG way, but I'm hardly the only one, Melky, Posada. I also said that CC has "shown to be a horse" and that if the Yankees get "200 innings out of CC the next three years and have a fresh CC come October, they'd be in good shape." Seems like a wash to me. I said that CC could break down because of his weight -- and he said he lost 25 pounds last offseason to help himself for JUST this sort of thing.

Cano I was wrong about. He's turned into a legitimate superstar and is probably better than Pedroia (probably because Pedroia had the same WAR over the 2010 season if you double his PAs... which is coincidentally about the same amount as Cano had).

So yeah, my predictions have been pretty good.
lvmez 2:58 AM - 20 April, 2011
it's sad because i'm sure that lad at some point was a "true" baseball fan. for him, it's all about stats and trying to know the game by numbers.
dj lad 3:03 AM - 20 April, 2011
It's sad that you think that's how I feel about baseball. I can enjoy watching an interleague between the Royals and Pirates because it's the best sport in the world.

It's sad that you enjoy ignorance.
dj lad 3:08 AM - 20 April, 2011
Let's put it this way: I like to learn as much as possible about the things I love.
lvmez 3:11 AM - 20 April, 2011
throughout this thread all you have done talked about stats. baseball is so much than stats. you've been wrong 50% of the time, sorry i meant your sources have been wrong 50% of the time. stop wasting your time and just enjoy the game.
dj lad 3:19 AM - 20 April, 2011
I enjoy the game just fine, and I've been right FAR MORE than 50% and FAR MORE often than you have, chum.

Like I said: I like to learn as much as possible about the thing I love. Music, Baseball, Football, etc. It's really a shame you don't share that passion about learning about the things you obviously love but choose to be ignorant.
lvmez 11:45 AM - 20 April, 2011
how can "you" be right about anything? you don't have your own opinions about the sport. It's all based on someone else's writings. it's sounds like your not smart enough to realize that theses stats don't account for human nature of the sport. all these stats to try and predict what will happen throughout the season, for what?

example: the red sox. did you think they would start off this bad? NOOOOOOOOO.

enjoy the game and stop trying to predict the future.
dj lad 5:42 PM - 20 April, 2011
WOW YOU GOT ME. I DONT HAVE MY OWN OPINIONS.

As I said before, find ONE example of my plagiarizing someone else and I'll gladly tell you I'm wrong. But you can't. You can't find a single fucking one

This is literally the same classic bullshit argument that you hear from dumb people who are scared of things they don't (or can't) understand. Dumb people. Like you.

Again: I enjoy learning as much as I can about the things I love. You don't. That's fine.

You need to read Joe Posnanski's blog post about this exact thing, because he can explain it in a far more eloquent way than I ever hope I could. But since it's reading something longer than a paragraph, I'm sure you'll skip it.

joeposnanski.blogspot.com

Here's the kicker line:

"That bit is ancient, and it's dumb, and consigning the person you disagree with into their mother's basement is just admitting you've run out of arguments."

You've skipped the "mother's basement" bit and are just using the "stop using stats so much".
dj lad 5:45 PM - 20 April, 2011
Literally, this is your argument for EVERYTHING: "Because I'm too stupid to have an original thought myself, other people could not have had one."
lvmez 6:28 PM - 20 April, 2011
your a robot who relies on websites to form an opinion cause your too much of a mental midget to do it on your own.

and you only started to quote from websites after i accused of plagiarizing. it hit a nerve and then you started bringing up websites.

loser.
dj lad 7:03 PM - 20 April, 2011
The irony of someone spelling "you're" like "your" (TWICE!) while insulting someone's intelligence is pretty rich.

I'm way too stupid to write as well as Joe Posnanski does. He's probably the best sports writer on the planet, if not one of the ten best writers on the planet.

As I said: find one case of me plagiarizing, and I'll gladly admit to it.

Until then: give it a rest. I like talking to you guys because some of you are great baseball fans and it's always fun to talk the game with people who actually like talking it. Then there's you, who just poisons every discussion with ad hominem attacks.

For the record, when you asked a few days ago about what websites I read, I was actually thinking that maybe you were interested in learning more about the statistical side of the game. It was a nice development and I was hoping that was where this was going. It's pretty pathetic that you're stuck on the same argument you made a long time ago, which is: "I'm too dumb to come up with my own arguments, so I will just insult others who are smart enough to do so." Which is really, really, really sad.
DVDjHardy 7:09 PM - 20 April, 2011
Hey Cisco and Jim, this is why most of baseball hates your team. You have some retarded fans, and this guy is a shining example. Not only can he not make any logical baseball arguments, but he also can't spell at the first-grade level.
lvmez 7:12 PM - 20 April, 2011
the cheerleader is back.
DJ CISC0 8:51 PM - 20 April, 2011
Wow...WTF happened in here?
dj lad 8:54 PM - 20 April, 2011
lvmez acted stupid and got called out on it.

So, your normal Wednesday.
lvmez 9:45 PM - 20 April, 2011
lad is still quoting websites but now he is telling us where he is getting his info from because he got called out.
dj lad 9:59 PM - 20 April, 2011
You do realize that Pos isn't a stat guy, he's a baseball writer who writes in prose.

I've been saying for YEARS, literally, YEARS where I've been getting my data.

You know how people learn? They read and absorb what other people have recorded. It's why we know what the atomic weight of Helium is and when the Mayflower landed in America. We take what we have learned and make judgments on it. That's learning. It's what I'm doing.

Go ahead and tell me how what I'm doing is different: taking information, digesting it and making assessments based on that information.

If you would like me to sit and actually calculate every players WAR before I talk about it, then you're a moron, because that's what you're implying. I can do it, but it's not worth my time when others have taken factual information and processed it and published those numbers on the Internet.
dj lad 10:01 PM - 20 April, 2011
In essence: you're accusing me of learning.
Dj-M.Bezzle 10:07 PM - 20 April, 2011
Quote:
In essence: you're accusing me of learning.


well have none of that on this site
lvmez 12:39 AM - 21 April, 2011
Quote:
In essence: you're accusing me of learning.


your a certified idiot. congratulations on wanting to learn. this is not what i am accusing you of.

If we were talking about math problems then it would be in black and white, BUT we are not.

The definition of "sport": an athletic activity requiring skill or physical prowess and often of a competitive nature, as racing, baseball, tennis, golf, bowling, wrestling, boxing, hunting, fishing, etc.

you ASSume that by studying stats you now have the knowledge to predict what is going to happen.

find me a stat that predicted Mariano Rivera pitching this great at this age. I didn't think so.
dj lad 1:03 AM - 21 April, 2011
Again: the irony of calling someone an idiot while you misspell "you're" as "your". Fucking brilliance on your part, chum.

Actually, statistics are, by definition, math problems. And they are in black and white. Getting 3 hits in 10 at bats gives you a .300 average.

Congrats on building a straw man argument. For every one Rivera, there's five hundred Mark Priors or Billy Kochs. Using him as an example is like blaming your stock broker for not predicting that Apple would be worth what it is today. It's a straw man argument and it's a way to show that you don't really have any evidence to back up what you're saying. Rivera has shown to be a freak of nature, a guy who has built his career upon throwing one pitch. Repeatedly. And he's the best ever at a) throwing it and b) closing a baseball game. The best. You can't predict that someone is going to be the best ever at something, otherwise teams would always go out of their way to sign "the best". You make educated predictions using factors from the past: how similar players with their body type have held up; how other players with similar careers have tended to trend; how players who pitch a certain way tend to hold up versus injury; and so on. It's not an exact science, and I've certainly never claimed it to be. It's a guessing game.

But you are going to have a LOT more success if you use statistics, numbers, and yes, MATH PROBLEMS, to make a best and accurate guess. That's all you can do. I never said I could predict the future. I said that I've been able to make a lot of correct predictions and some pretty wrong ones as well.

This is what major league baseball teams do. They don't just say "Fuck it, let's just pick up random players and hope it works out". Teams, for DECADES, have been using advanced statistics to make decisions. Branch Rickey, Sandy Alderson, Pat Gillick, Stick Michael -- all great GMs who ALL, before stats were "cool", were using them to make decisions that weren't just based on watching the game. Because you know what the difference between a .250 hitter a .275 hitter is? 13 hits over 6 months. That's 2 hits a month. That's it. If you think that without recording and analyzing the numbers that you can tell who is a better hitter, then you're absolutely bonkers. The games and nights blend together. You actually do NEED the stats to make decisions and make predictions. You make EDUCATED predictions using them, rather than just going in blindly.

Tell me, do you like Joe Morgan?
lvmez 1:16 AM - 21 April, 2011
Quote:
some pretty wrong ones as well.


if you were an owner or a GM I would understand using stats to to pay out large amounts of money, even though GM's have signed players on gut feelings alone. There is a long list of players that should have never received large contracts but the GM had a feeling that the player might work out. So NOT everyone uses stats.

The bottom line is that your a smuck who thinks that every stat is correct and base all your arguements around numbers that 50% right.
DJ CISC0 2:01 AM - 21 April, 2011
OK, NOW I get it....Bill James (who started all this in depth stat Sabermatrics madness) works for the Red Sox as a consultant! Makes you think where he went wrong this season....and the last few.

BTW lad, I read the mommys basement story on the train going home....funny story.
lvmez 2:09 AM - 21 April, 2011
some very good points why Sabermatrics always doesn't make sense.

answers.yahoo.com
dj lad 4:22 AM - 21 April, 2011
Quote:
Quote:
some pretty wrong ones as well.


if you were an owner or a GM I would understand using stats to to pay out large amounts of money, even though GM's have signed players on gut feelings alone. There is a long list of players that should have never received large contracts but the GM had a feeling that the player might work out. So NOT everyone uses stats.

The bottom line is that your a smuck who thinks that every stat is correct and base all your arguements around numbers that 50% right.

Um, that's fine if you don't want to use stats (other than the precious "Triple Crown" ones, since I assume you love Batting Average and Wins).

DJ Vice plays music, right? Okay. I play music too. Okay. Now, I like looking at music in the same way he does. Why? Because he's the best at what he does - his cuts are precise, his selection is great, and his mic skills are top notch. Now, if I want to learn to be a better DJ, shouldn't I learn by listening -- but not copying -- to his work? You learn from the best and then take it and make it your own.

Do you see where I'm going with this?

And yes, EVERY GM uses stats. Every one of them. They're running businesses that are worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Believe me when I say this: if they aren't looking at advanced statistical analysis, then they're failing, because EVERY business that is worth hundreds of millions of dollars uses advanced mathematics to help make decisions. It's how business works -- not sure you're familiar with this sort of thing.

So, can you please provide me with a case of a GM in the last twenty years signing a free agent to a large contract based on their gut alone? One, that's all I ask. You said there's a long list, so you must have a long list of names.

Quote:
OK, NOW I get it....Bill James (who started all this in depth stat Sabermatrics madness) works for the Red Sox as a consultant! Makes you think where he went wrong this season....and the last few.

BTW lad, I read the mommys basement story on the train going home....funny story.

Joe Posnanski, as I said, is a PHENOMENAL writer. There's a reason he's the main writer for SI. His columns are really really great. Honestly, read everything he does. He's awesome.

As for James, he started working for the Sox in 2003, but he began writing about baseball in 1977. I picked up reading him back in 1996 because of a friend and I haven't stopped. His Abstracts have are truly awesome. Without him, Football Outsiders wouldn't exist, and Daryl Morey would not be the GM of the Rockets. His work transcends baseball - he's a really smart guy and a great writer who has influenced minds in sports and business.

As for this season: the Red Sox are 6-11. In 2007, the Yankees started 10-14. In 2000, the Yankees finished 3-15.

It's literally 1/10th into the season. Teams have these stretches -- in fact nearly every team except the incredible ones (2001 Mariners, 1998 Yankees) have them. It's common. I'm not worried. And the Red Sox made the playoffs in 2008 and 2009. You guys must love Joe Morgan, seriously. LOVE him.

Quote:
some very good points why Sabermatrics always doesn't make sense.

answers.yahoo.com

Congrats on using Yahoo Answers to make a point. Wow. I did not think you could sink lower -- and the responders in the comments do a great job of completely destroying the question and the "best answer chosen". So, I'll quote from the same piece you did. The last comment:

"I refuse to accept that statistical analysis of this great game peaked in the 1880s.

Having more information is a good thing. That's not to say that all the many things available are useful or insightful or bring greater understanding -- but many do, and others tend to be new and in need of refinement.

I know a few diehard sabermetricians and read several others, and invariably every one of them has expressed that their appreciation of baseball DEEPENED based on their new learnings and research.

Not to worry, RBI and batting average are still readily available. I give them the merest glimpse before moving on to the interesting stuff -- because those stats no longer tell me nearly enough. I'm much happier jumping into the deep end of the stats pool.

And I'm even happier when I'm watching or listening to a game.

Better analysis is a good thing, yes."

This. This. One thousand times this. My love of baseball has GROWN since reading about baseball in this fashion. It's really pathetic that you choose to bring me people down who like to learn -- then again, maybe you're just jealous that others have the propensity to want to learn when you would rather not.

Willful ignorance is astounding.
dj lad 4:23 AM - 21 April, 2011
Sorry, not "bring me people down", but rather "bring people down".
dj lad 4:25 AM - 21 April, 2011
Hahah, the Yahoo answer guy said "clog the bases" like it's a bad thing. That's literally the dumbest thing ever. The #1 thing you want in baseball is to "clog the bases".
lvmez 12:06 PM - 21 April, 2011
Living in New york we get to see the Mets quite a bit. Over the last few years, THERE IS NO WAY THEY HAVE SIGNED GUYS BASED ON STATS ALONE. Omar Minaya gave out some horrible contracts based gut feelings. There are tons of examples where stats are being used. Sometimes it works out and sometimes it does(50%).

Before the season started you were bashing the yankees for signing older players who were washed up. It seeems like those older players have worked for them. There is NO WAY stats could have been used to sign Bartolo and Garcia.
DVDjHardy 12:50 PM - 21 April, 2011
^Wow, that's a long list with very convincing evidence.
lvmez 12:52 PM - 21 April, 2011
it's just an example of one team not using only stats to sign players. go eat a hamburger you troll.
DVDjHardy 2:07 PM - 21 April, 2011
Just like you are the one example of a man not using his brain before writing stuff. You know how it ended for Minaya, don't you? Go eat shit.
lvmez 3:55 PM - 21 April, 2011
very clever. you pop in here once in a while with no opinion what so ever. how many times can you suck lads dick?
Dj-M.Bezzle 4:00 PM - 21 April, 2011
Quote:

Again: the irony of calling someone an idiot while you misspell "you're" as "your". Fucking brilliance on your part, chum.


your and you're must be responsable for more forum escallations than any topic or phrase on the interwebz
DJ CISC0 4:16 PM - 21 April, 2011
Quote:
Living in New york we get to see the Mets quite a bit. Over the last few years, THERE IS NO WAY THEY HAVE SIGNED GUYS BASED ON STATS ALONE. Omar Minaya gave out some horrible contracts based gut feelings. There are tons of examples where stats are being used. Sometimes it works out and sometimes it does(50%).

Before the season started you were bashing the yankees for signing older players who were washed up. It seeems like those older players have worked for them. There is NO WAY stats could have been used to sign Bartolo and Garcia.


This is a good point and a perfect example would be the signing of Jason Bay. Don't you think that if the Mets would of applied the Sabermatric formula, AND taken "ballpark" into account, it should've been clear as day that Citi Field would of been an issue for BAY?....But yet they sign him to what? 4 yrs at 60 mil? So after raping the green monster in Fenway, he goes to Citi Field and only gets 6 HRs in over 400 PAs. How many of those 6 HRs were in Citi Field? Granted, he got injured towards the end of the season...but still.

The same can be said about Delgado and Beltran.
dj lad 5:11 PM - 21 April, 2011
Quote:
Living in New york we get to see the Mets quite a bit. Over the last few years, THERE IS NO WAY THEY HAVE SIGNED GUYS BASED ON STATS ALONE. Omar Minaya gave out some horrible contracts based gut feelings. There are tons of examples where stats are being used. Sometimes it works out and sometimes it does(50%).

Before the season started you were bashing the yankees for signing older players who were washed up. It seeems like those older players have worked for them. There is NO WAY stats could have been used to sign Bartolo and Garcia.

Not once did I say that stats alone have been used (except, maybe, in the Oakland organization). Traditional scouting ABSOLUTELY has a place within organizations still.

As for the Mets: the Mets have been using stats for decades, just like every other team, to help make decisions. Minaya may just like looking at batting average and errors. Or maybe he looked at WAR. I don't know. The point is that stats aren't some sort of absolute predictor: they're just a piece of the puzzle. They help you make an educated prediction (as I have said before), but they're not going to give you an EXACT answer, which is what you seem to think I'm saying. But having as MUCH data as possible to make a decision is a good thing.

CISC0, there's no "sabermetric formula". There's just a lot of stats you can use. Moreover, there's simply no way to predict injuries. Delgado was a great pickup for the Mets -- he had a 121 OPS+ while there before his catastrophic injury. Was he the same guy as his years in Toronto? No, but that run he had from 98-03 was a pretty insane run and that's hard to duplicate. As for Beltran, in his first 4 years in New York, he averaged 149 games and a 125 OPS+, while stealing bases at an 84% clip and playing excellent defense. That was a GREAT signing, and then, after playing 161 games in 2008, he's played in 162 games since over three seasons -- while still putting up a 131 OPS+ over that time. It's not like he's been bad -- just hurt. His first year in the NL was rough, but he bounced back in a BIG way in 2006 putting up 41 homers and finishing fourth in the MVP voting.

Both of those deals were good deals for the Mets that went bad because of freak injuries to two guys who had been very healthy (both had averaged at least 147 games a year since becoming regular starting players). Those are two AWFUL examples. Terrible.

Bay is a strange case - he's hit well in both leagues. I suspect that he never got healthy in New York. If he IS healthy, I think he'll put up numbers closer to his ones in Boston and PIttsburgh. More importantly, looking at 400 PAs versus looking at the previous 3900 is a short sighted idea.

The big contracts the Mets have given out haven't been bad deals -- just ones that have resulted in players who after a long period of health have gotten injured. Even Santana fits into this category.

Oliver Perez: now there's a bad contract! Still, in his first two full years in NY, he had two good to decent years -- yes he walked a lot of guys, but he also struck out a lot and didn't allow a lot of hits. Giving him that 4/48 deal wasn't the smartest move, but it wasn't an awful one.

The point is that you don't use stats to make every decision for you, you use them to help make more informed and educated decisions and assessments. It's just that simple.

For Colon & Garcia, let's see how they're pitching in August. Looking at the 25 innings they've collectively thrown and declaring it a great success seems odd.
DJ CISC0 7:01 PM - 21 April, 2011
Quote:
CISC0, there's no "sabermetric formula". There's just a lot of stats you can use. Moreover, there's simply no way to predict injuries.
Really? You don't say? Funny tho how CC's arm was being "predicted" to be blown out (yes, I'm bringing it up again) according to the amount of pitches he was throwing at an early age.... But yeah I forgot "he's a freak" right?
uno seis 7:15 PM - 21 April, 2011
"Bill James defined sabermetrics as "the search for objective knowledge about baseball." Thus, sabermetrics attempts to answer objective questions about baseball"

There is definitely a place for traditional scouting (subjective) in evaluating baseball players, just like there is a place for sabermetric analysis. We are all baseball fans here, so let's keep it moving...
dj lad 7:17 PM - 21 April, 2011
For fuck's sake: you can't predict injuries any more than you can predict that someone will hit exactly 33 HR, have an OBP of .423 and commit 17 errors.

You can look at the past and say: "Hey, a lot of guys who threw a TON of pitches at young age have gone through arm troubles. It would make sense tht other pitchers, who also threw a TON of pitches at a young age, had arm troubles."

Of the top 20 guys in terms of innings pitched between age 20 and 26 in the expansion era (generally considered the "injury nexus years" for pitchers), here's the breakdown:

Lasted Long Time:
Bert Blyleven
Catfish Hunter
Frank Tanana
Don Sutton
Greg Maddux

Injury Problems by 28:
Denny McLain
Joe Coleman
Dean Chance
Mike Witt

Injury Problems by 30:
Fernando Valenzuela
Ken Holtzman
Sam McDowell
Doc Gooden
Bret Saberhagen
Dick Ellsworth

Injury Problems by 32:
Vida Blue
Rick Wise
Dave Stieb

Changed roles / Unknown:
Dennis Eckersley
CC Sabathia

Nearly 75% of the pitchers who threw a shit-ton of innings between ages 20 and 26 were basically finished by age 32. That's a really high attrition rate. It's kind of remarkable, actually.

This isn't rocket science, CISC0. It really isn't.

(And for the record, I did all that research myself. I looked up pages on Baseball-Reference, and using the Play Index tool, checked the top 20 pitchers by innings pitched between ages 20 and 26. It was really easy to do, but I just wanted to make sure that you guys knew I wasn't "stealing" someone elses work. I was using a publicly available resource for research.)
dj lad 7:18 PM - 21 April, 2011
Quote:
"Bill James defined sabermetrics as "the search for objective knowledge about baseball." Thus, sabermetrics attempts to answer objective questions about baseball"

There is definitely a place for traditional scouting (subjective) in evaluating baseball players, just like there is a place for sabermetric analysis. We are all baseball fans here, so let's keep it moving...

lvmez says I'm not because I like taking my knowledge of baseball past stats invented in the 19th century.
DJ CISC0 7:56 PM - 21 April, 2011
Quote:
For fuck's sake: you can't predict injuries any more than you can predict that someone will hit exactly 33 HR, have an OBP of .423 and commit 17 errors.

Oh my bad...I thought this was your prediction.
Quote:
As for Sabathaia...it's not irrelevant.
My prediction? He has a career that looks more like Dave Stieb (www.baseball-reference.com) than Greg Maddux. Stieb threw four straight 200 inning seasons and then fell apart.

So according to your prediction, you're giving CC another year?
dj lad 8:05 PM - 21 April, 2011
There's a reason that Sabathia made a point to lose 25 pounds this offseason. It's hard on his arm to work with that kind of weight.

He's in his age 30 season now. Stieb fell apart after his age 32.

Would it shock you to see a 300 pound --- sorry, 275 pound -- pitcher have arm troubles after throwing nearly 2800 innings?

Be honest with your answer please.
lvmez 8:09 PM - 21 April, 2011
Quote:
Quote:
"Bill James defined sabermetrics as "the search for objective knowledge about baseball." Thus, sabermetrics attempts to answer objective questions about baseball"

There is definitely a place for traditional scouting (subjective) in evaluating baseball players, just like there is a place for sabermetric analysis. We are all baseball fans here, so let's keep it moving...

lvmez says I'm not because I like taking my knowledge of baseball past stats invented in the 19th century.


where did i say that? My opinion is that as a fan why obsess over stats when clearly they are not even accurate for owners and GM's.

The mets gave gave Luis Castillo 4 years, 25 million dollars. I'm positive they didn't use stats.
dj lad 8:09 PM - 21 April, 2011
It's entirely possible that he throws 200 innings a year until he's 40. He could end up like Blyleven, Hunter, Tanana, Sutton, or Maddux.

When only 25% of the pitchers in the last 40 years have done something, isn't it wise to predict on the side of the 75%?
DJ CISC0 8:09 PM - 21 April, 2011
Also, why stop at just pitchers? I say they should generate some more stats on outfielders who constantly try to throw someone out at second, third, or home? I'm sure their at some type of risk on being injured. This way every scout will have a general idea on when a player is just about done. Or speedy runners who tries to beat out a bs chopper by running his ass off to first. Even catchers...let's count how many times they squat per game and add that to the amount of times he runs to first to cover.....I'm sure they have some sort of stat on that no?
DJ CISC0 8:13 PM - 21 April, 2011
Quote:
He's in his age 30 season now. Stieb fell apart after his age 32.

Would it shock you to see a 300 pound --- sorry, 275 pound -- pitcher have arm troubles after throwing nearly 2800 innings?

Be honest with your answer please.

He turns 31 in July so OK a year and 3 months....And NO it wouldn't...but that wasn't my point...I actually think I forgot what my point was...This thread is going in circles.
dj lad 8:15 PM - 21 April, 2011
Quote:
Also, why stop at just pitchers? I say they should generate some more stats on outfielders who constantly try to throw someone out at second, third, or home? I'm sure their at some type of risk on being injured. This way every scout will have a general idea on when a player is just about done. Or speedy runners who tries to beat out a bs chopper by running his ass off to first. Even catchers...let's count how many times they squat per game and add that to the amount of times he runs to first to cover.....I'm sure they have some sort of stat on that no?

The number of times an outfielder makes a strenuous throw home in a game versus a pitcher is probably about 90 to 1 -- 90 because there's 3 outfielders and 1 pitcher. It's not even apples and oranges, it's apples and orangutans.

Throwing a pitch is one of worst things you can do to your arm. It's really bad for it. Throwing submarine style is actually way better. A good friend of mine runs a website called Driveline Mechanics which goes very deep into the processes behind pitching motions. It's down right now (being absorbed by SB Nation), but when its back up, please check it out.

As for catchers, it's a pretty interesting topic. There's a lot of people in Minnesota who want Mauer to move out from behind the plate because the number of "big" catchers (meaning tall) who haven't had major knee issues can be counted on one hand. Carlton Fisk is one of the only "big" catchers to stick and be able to catch for a long time.
dj lad 8:17 PM - 21 April, 2011
Quote:
Quote:
He's in his age 30 season now. Stieb fell apart after his age 32.

Would it shock you to see a 300 pound --- sorry, 275 pound -- pitcher have arm troubles after throwing nearly 2800 innings?

Be honest with your answer please.

He turns 31 in July so OK a year and 3 months....And NO it wouldn't...but that wasn't my point...I actually think I forgot what my point was...This thread is going in circles.

It's his year 30 season. All seasons in baseball are determined by their age on July 1st -- its how its been in baseball for a long time. Don't blame me for this one.

Okay, so WHY don't you think Sabathia will have arm troubles? Can you provide a reason?
dj lad 8:18 PM - 21 April, 2011
Quote:
where did i say that? My opinion is that as a fan why obsess over stats when clearly they are not even accurate for owners and GM's.

The mets gave gave Luis Castillo 4 years, 25 million dollars. I'm positive they didn't use stats.

You're right. No stat is accurate. They should just stop collecting them.
lvmez 8:20 PM - 21 April, 2011
Quote:
Quote:
where did i say that? My opinion is that as a fan why obsess over stats when clearly they are not even accurate for owners and GM's.

The mets gave gave Luis Castillo 4 years, 25 million dollars. I'm positive they didn't use stats.

You're right. No stat is accurate. They should just stop collecting them.


lol. that was funny.
dj lad 8:23 PM - 21 April, 2011
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
where did i say that? My opinion is that as a fan why obsess over stats when clearly they are not even accurate for owners and GM's.

The mets gave gave Luis Castillo 4 years, 25 million dollars. I'm positive they didn't use stats.

You're right. No stat is accurate. They should just stop collecting them.


lol. that was funny.

It's what you said, right? "Clearly they are not even accurate for owners and GM's."
lvmez 8:26 PM - 21 April, 2011
50% of the time.
dj lad 8:26 PM - 21 April, 2011
Sorry, Driveline Baseball, not Driveline Mechanics.
dj lad 8:26 PM - 21 April, 2011
Quote:
50% of the time.

So stats are only accurate 50% of the time?
dj lad 8:26 PM - 21 April, 2011
You're telling me that mathematics is only right 50% of the time?
DJ CISC0 8:27 PM - 21 April, 2011
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:
Would it shock you to see a 300 pound --- sorry, 275 pound -- pitcher have arm troubles after throwing nearly 2800 innings?

Be honest with your answer please.

He turns 31 in July so OK a year and 3 months....And NO it wouldn't...but that wasn't my point...I actually think I forgot what my point was...This thread is going in circles.

It's his year 30 season. All seasons in baseball are determined by their age on July 1st -- its how its been in baseball for a long time. Don't blame me for this one.

Okay, so WHY don't you think Sabathia will have arm troubles? Can you provide a reason?

I actually agreed to not being shocked by a 300 pound pitcher throwing 2800 innings.
lvmez 8:28 PM - 21 April, 2011
The point is that owners don't even rely on stats alone. The proof is in the contracts that have been given out.
dj lad 8:31 PM - 21 April, 2011
Quote:
The point is that owners don't even rely on stats alone. The proof is in the contracts that have been given out.

I never said that they do.

They do, however, use advanced metrics (a lot of the time, they're actually proprietary) that give better insight into a players value, than say, batting average. Or strikeouts.

Now, can you defend that 50% number please? I'd love to hear where you got it from.
lvmez 8:39 PM - 21 April, 2011
I'm making a point that it's a gamble with every player. This argument started because you live and die by the stats and disagree. And I feel that there are a lot of examples that show how baseball executives don't you use stats all time as well.

Please explain the Luis Castillo signing.
dj lad 8:47 PM - 21 April, 2011
Quote:
I'm making a point that it's a gamble with every player. This argument started because you live and die by the stats and disagree. And I feel that there are a lot of examples that show how baseball executives don't you use stats all time as well.

Please explain the Luis Castillo signing.

I don't live and die by statistics. I use them to greater understand the game in a way that you, apparently, don't care to.

As for Castillo: Fangraphs ranks his 2007 as worth $9.4M. This is following seasons worth 8.4, 13.4, 10.4, and 13.3 In fact, even his 2009 was worth 7.1. I think the Mets said, "this guy is worth at least $6M a year. He gets on base at a good clip (.370 in 2007 with the Mets), has good hands, is an excellent double play partner, and was only going into his age 32 season.

Was it a good decision to give him that contract? No. Can I understand WHY? Yes.
lvmez 9:12 PM - 21 April, 2011
He received that contract for getting Johan to sign with Mets.
slimmjimm 1:28 AM - 22 April, 2011
Jesus fuckin h guys,

It's baseball, enjoy it.
dj lad 6:18 AM - 22 April, 2011
Hugs for everyone!
dj lad 7:58 AM - 22 April, 2011
Interesting stat:

The starters ERA for the Red Sox is 4.87. They've had 6 straight games of starters allowing 2 ER or less. The Yankees starters ERA is the worst in the AL at 5.06.

While I certainly don't expect the Red Sox or Yankees team ERA to remain that low, this is just a great case of "It's early in the season, let's not get so hasty to declare anyone great or awful yet".
DJ CISC0 4:47 PM - 22 April, 2011
Quote:
Interesting stat:

The starters ERA for the Red Sox is 4.87. They've had 6 straight games of starters allowing 2 ER or less. The Yankees starters ERA is the worst in the AL at 5.06.

While I certainly don't expect the Red Sox or Yankees team ERA to remain that low, this is just a great case of "It's early in the season, let's not get so hasty to declare anyone great or awful yet".

Yet, both teams are 6-4 in their last 10 games. The difference is one team is in first and the other is in last. It's funny because the Yankees lead the majors in HRs but come in 2nd to last in hits....go figure.
lvmez 4:54 PM - 22 April, 2011
On a different note, Jesus Montero Is killing it in the minor leagues. He will be trade bait in a few months.
DJ CISC0 4:58 PM - 22 April, 2011
And speaking of Jason Bay. Have you ever heard of a 4 base error, inside the park HR? He did this last night.

Watchwww.youtube.com
DJ CISC0 6:05 PM - 22 April, 2011
Quote:
On a different note, Jesus Montero Is killing it in the minor leagues. He will be trade bait in a few months.

For King Felix?
dj lad 6:20 PM - 22 April, 2011
Quote:
Quote:
Interesting stat:

The starters ERA for the Red Sox is 4.87. They've had 6 straight games of starters allowing 2 ER or less. The Yankees starters ERA is the worst in the AL at 5.06.

While I certainly don't expect the Red Sox or Yankees team ERA to remain that low, this is just a great case of "It's early in the season, let's not get so hasty to declare anyone great or awful yet".

Yet, both teams are 6-4 in their last 10 games. The difference is one team is in first and the other is in last. It's funny because the Yankees lead the majors in HRs but come in 2nd to last in hits....go figure.

It's the perils of small sample size, that's all my point was. At this point in the season, a 4-for-4 day for a hitter will raise their average 50 points.

Fun quote from Daniel Bard:
Quote:
Bard said he has spent some time on Fangraphs.com reading the work those guys have done on a stat called Shutdowns and Meltdowns. It's a simple way to evaluate relievers.

“It’s just another way to look at things," Bard said.
dj lad 6:22 PM - 22 April, 2011
Quote:
And speaking of Jason Bay. Have you ever heard of a 4 base error, inside the park HR? He did this last night.

Watchwww.youtube.com

That's insane.
lvmez 6:33 PM - 22 April, 2011
Quote:
Quote:
On a different note, Jesus Montero Is killing it in the minor leagues. He will be trade bait in a few months.

For King Felix?


we are going to need more than that to get felix. things can change but right now, it looks like a long season for seattle. yankees have good trade bait, but it's a long shot to get him.
DJ CISC0 6:51 PM - 22 April, 2011
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
On a different note, Jesus Montero Is killing it in the minor leagues. He will be trade bait in a few months.

For King Felix?


we are going to need more than that to get felix. things can change but right now, it looks like a long season for seattle. yankees have good trade bait, but it's a long shot to get him.

No, I know. I meant like to include him in a package. I just learned that Felix does have a no trade clause to a few teams, including Bos, Mets, and Yanks. Even though that really doesn't mean much but still its interesting as to why he would have that on there in the first place.
DJ CISC0 6:54 PM - 22 April, 2011
Quote:
Quote:
And speaking of Jason Bay. Have you ever heard of a 4 base error, inside the park HR? He did this last night.

Watchwww.youtube.com Watchwww.youtube.com

That's insane.

Yeah, I know. My manager (who's a big time Met fan) called me this morning and asked me if I seen it...My response was " a what"!?
dj lad 9:50 PM - 22 April, 2011
I just don't see Felix being moved this season. He's literally the only reason to go to see a Mariners game besides Ichiro. They have some very good prospects (Ackley, Pineda, Franklin) and could make noise there next season very easily. Justin Smoak should become a very good hitter soon as well.

His contract is small enough this year (10M) that it doesn't make sense to move him. Maybe next year when it's 18.5, but Seattle has money -- they've got deep pockets, as they have a $450 MILLION dollar TV deal that runs ten years. Cliff Lee was traded because they knew they couldn't keep him long term. Felix is already signed through 2014.

The only reason they'd move him is if they got back so much talent they just couldn't say no; as great a prospect as Montero is (and he's great), he's still just a propsect.
lvmez 10:34 PM - 22 April, 2011
But they just wouldn't get Montero. They would whoever they wanted from yankees.
lvmez 10:34 PM - 22 April, 2011
I still agree, I don't see him being traded.
dj lad 8:44 AM - 24 April, 2011
www.brooksbaseball.net

See those two dots in the middle?

That's the "shuuto" pitch -- Matsuzaka hasn't thrown it much in the US, so it was kind of shocking.

Watchwww.youtube.com
dj lad 5:32 PM - 24 April, 2011
sports.espn.go.com

At least we're not Dodgers fans.
slimmjimm 12:02 AM - 25 April, 2011
Quote:
sports.espn.go.com

At least we're not Dodgers fans.



What a clusterfuck, even more than I imagined. Just spent the last 45 minutes or so diving into the Dodger dumpster.
DJ CISC0 3:18 AM - 25 April, 2011
Quote:
www.brooksbaseball.net

See those two dots in the middle?

That's the "shuuto" pitch -- Matsuzaka hasn't thrown it much in the US, so it was kind of shocking.

Watchwww.youtube.com
That's an insane pitch. It looks like they're throwing a wiffle ball.
dj lad 4:44 AM - 25 April, 2011
It's an inverse slider, basically. Moves in a way that is opposite how a typical righty throws one.

Matsuzaka hasn't thrown one since 2007, so seeing him throw 2 is crazy.
DJ CISC0 3:01 AM - 26 April, 2011
Exactly what I was noticing...hence the "wiffle ball" comment. I had to watch a few more vids of that pitch and it's crazy how silly it makes the batters look.

So the Red Sox are on a little 5 gm winning streak huh? They are almost playing .500 ball.

Oh yeah and the whole fiasco with the Dodgers is so pathetic that I can't even waste time following it anymore. The former Rangers president is running them for now so at least that's a good note so far.
dj lad 3:43 AM - 26 April, 2011
To be fair, the "streak" the Sox are on isn't just any streak. No starting pitcher in the last 9 games has allowed more than 1 earned run. I don't think that's happened in 40 years.
DJ CISC0 11:31 PM - 4 May, 2011
Ouch! This Sox fan gets rocked! Lad, was this you bro? lol

www.worldstarhiphop.com
dj lad 11:54 PM - 4 May, 2011
OH SHIT! That dude got fucking LEVELED!

And no, it wasn't me.
dj lad 5:53 PM - 6 May, 2011
In his last 561 plate appearances going back to last season, Derek Jeter has hit one home run.
DJ CISC0 7:58 PM - 6 May, 2011
I was waiting until you got on Jeter...what took you so long? Yeah sure he's in a funk...no question. I would rather be more concerned with Crawford who only has 23 hits, 1 HR, .197 BA in 117 ABs.

Oh and BTW The Yankees lead the majors in HRs with 46...8 more than Texas. So HR's are not an issue right now for the Yanks.
dj lad 9:14 PM - 6 May, 2011
Well, Jeter really doesn't matter to the Yankees. They can afford him even if he never plays a single inning in the field.

Crawford is a different story. He's had awful starts before. And he's still only in his age 29 season. Jeter is in his 37 age season. If you don't see the difference, I don't know what to tell you.
slimmjimm 9:30 PM - 6 May, 2011
Quote:
Well, Jeter really doesn't matter to the Yankees. They can afford him even if he never plays a single inning in the field.

Crawford is a different story. He's had awful starts before. And he's still only in his age 29 season. Jeter is in his 37 age season. If you don't see the difference, I don't know what to tell you.


Difference is easy.

Jeter has been of a good quality his entire career, and is in a funk after many great seasons.

Crawford, who has been great for a smaller number of seasons, is in a funk, affecting his quality.

Also, when was Jeter ever a HR hitter?
dj lad 9:42 PM - 6 May, 2011
Well, it's that he's hitting 72% of the balls he puts into play on the ground. Meaning - he's not driving the ball. He's hitting .250 on the strength of infield hits. He's hit TWO line drives for hits all year. That's a problem.

Crawford is younger - a lot younger. If you'd like to place a bet on who will have a higher OPS at the end of the season, I'll take it.
dj lad 9:51 PM - 6 May, 2011
I don't love the Batter Similarity Scores on baseball-reference, but god damn the list of names for Brett Gardner is awesome.

Liz Funk (979)
Johnny Dickshot (972)
Bombo Rivera (972)
Al Libke (971)
Doug Taitt (971)
Herschel Bennett (971)
Rich Coggins (971)
Benny Meyer (970)
Bubba Morton (969)
John Sneed (968)

Johnny Dickshot?
slimmjimm 11:02 PM - 6 May, 2011
Quote:
Well, it's that he's hitting 72% of the balls he puts into play on the ground. Meaning - he's not driving the ball. He's hitting .250 on the strength of infield hits. He's hit TWO line drives for hits all year. That's a problem.

Crawford is younger - a lot younger. If you'd like to place a bet on who will have a higher OPS at the end of the season, I'll take it.


Crawford is younger, I'll take that bet if you're the one betting it's going to be Jeter. I'll also bet you that Crawford will have more HR than Jeter as well.

I only posted because you're comparing a 37yo who's had a great career to a 29 yo who has had a good career...........thus far.
DJ CISC0 1:05 AM - 7 May, 2011
Quote:
Crawford is a different story. He's had awful starts before. And he's still only in his age 29 season. Jeter is in his 37 age season. If you don't see the difference, I don't know what to tell you.
Cmon...seriously? Like Jeter was never in a funk before? Like slimm said...you're making a very bad comparison lad. If the Sox lose Yook or Gonzo right now, they are without a doubt up shits creek....but if Jeter continues playing like this (which I doubt) they still have a good amount of players that will hold it down for the Yanks.
dj lad 1:36 AM - 7 May, 2011
Quote:
Quote:
Well, it's that he's hitting 72% of the balls he puts into play on the ground. Meaning - he's not driving the ball. He's hitting .250 on the strength of infield hits. He's hit TWO line drives for hits all year. That's a problem.

Crawford is younger - a lot younger. If you'd like to place a bet on who will have a higher OPS at the end of the season, I'll take it.


Crawford is younger, I'll take that bet if you're the one betting it's going to be Jeter. I'll also bet you that Crawford will have more HR than Jeter as well.

I only posted because you're comparing a 37yo who's had a great career to a 29 yo who has had a good career...........thus far.

Dude, I didn't bring up Crawford. CISC0 did. Not me.

Quote:
Quote:
Crawford is a different story. He's had awful starts before. And he's still only in his age 29 season. Jeter is in his 37 age season. If you don't see the difference, I don't know what to tell you.
Cmon...seriously? Like Jeter was never in a funk before? Like slimm said...you're making a very bad comparison lad. If the Sox lose Yook or Gonzo right now, they are without a doubt up shits creek....but if Jeter continues playing like this (which I doubt) they still have a good amount of players that will hold it down for the Yanks.

Um, Jeter has been a decidedly mediocre baseball player for a 162 games. .669 OPS, 35 XBH in 736 PA with poor defense. This isn't a funk -- this is a decline. Do I think he's going to continue to be this bad? Probably not. But at this point Nunez should start 2 games a week.

I never made that comparison to start. You did. You decided to bring up Crawford in the context of "Oh, Jeter's having a bad year? Have you seen how Crawford is playing?"
lvmez 2:04 AM - 7 May, 2011
let's compare crawford to granderson (this year).

crawford is one of my favorite players but he is struggling. i'm sure he'll bounce back. as far as jeter is concerned, age is catching up to him. i'll be happy with .275, the rest of the line up will carry him.
DJ CISC0 2:35 AM - 7 May, 2011
Quote:
I never made that comparison to start. You did. You decided to bring up Crawford in the context of "Oh, Jeter's having a bad year? Have you seen how Crawford is playing?"
No, I never made a comparison. I said that you should be more concerned on how Crawford is playing this year (making an avg 20m/yr).

Just by you pulling up Gardner's comparison stats tells me that you are searching for the players that are struggling and putting them on blast. But, I rather have a few players struggling (DJ,Gardner, Hughes...) than a whole team struggling.
dj lad 4:22 AM - 7 May, 2011
Quote:
Quote:

Just by you pulling up Gardner's comparison stats tells me that you are searching for the players that are struggling and putting them on blast. But, I rather have a few players struggling (DJ,Gardner, Hughes...) than a whole team struggling.

Actually, no. I was looking at Ellsbury's page and then looked at Gardner's. I was scrolling through the page and there it was. It was funny, and I wanted to the share the link.

Dickshot?
dj lad 4:23 AM - 7 May, 2011
Quote:
let's compare crawford to granderson (this year).

crawford is one of my favorite players but he is struggling. i'm sure he'll bounce back. as far as jeter is concerned, age is catching up to him. i'll be happy with .275, the rest of the line up will carry him.

At 29, age is not catching up to him; if anything he's entering his prime. He's having a bad start, but I'm hardly worried about him in the long run.
dj lad 7:23 AM - 7 May, 2011
The problem with Jeter is this: his swing is based on quick hands. When he starts to lose bat speed, he can't drive the ball. For YEARS, he's been able to pull or away any pitch that comes towards him.

What would make sense is that in the last 12 months that he's longer able to turn on pitches and drive them like has in the past.

It's not an insult or a crack on him, mind you. It's literally a physical assessment of his ability to swing the bat like he has in the past.
slimmjimm 12:41 PM - 7 May, 2011
Paging captain obvious....................











































...............oh wait.

Sorry, didn't see you there.
DVDjHardy 3:08 PM - 7 May, 2011
Yankees got shitted on in Detroit. Bitches.`
DJ CISC0 8:25 PM - 7 May, 2011
Lad, you are right about his swing. Why do you think he adopted a new stance this year? It was to increase his bat speed.

Quote:
Yankees got shitted on in Detroit. Bitches.`
Typical Yankee first half...lose to the scrub teams and beat the better teams.
DJ CISC0 8:34 PM - 8 May, 2011
Jeter is 4 for 4 right now with 2 HRs, 3 RBIs, 1 SB. Him and Granderson actually went back to back. Oh yeah...all 3 HRs were over right field.... in Texas! Damn that short right field over there...its like a little league park.
dj lad 8:50 PM - 8 May, 2011
Well, it is one game. But it's certainly encouraging nonetheless.
DJ CISC0 9:38 PM - 8 May, 2011
Yeah, it's just one game but I just felt like throwing it out there.

Cervelli for the grand slam dead center and Tex hits another HR to right? Why isn't anyone checking on that right field? 4 HRs to right doesn't seem odd to you?
dj lad 10:24 PM - 8 May, 2011
Rangers Ballpark in Arlington has been a top 10 homer park in baseball 8 of the last 10 years.

It's well known for this.
lvmez 12:36 AM - 9 May, 2011
actually derek raised his average 29 points this week. he might be coming around. i'll be happy with .275.

Granderson is on fire. The pitching is really scaring me. Taking the series from the rangers was a good look for yankees.
DJ CISC0 1:58 AM - 9 May, 2011
Quote:
Rangers Ballpark in Arlington has been a top 10 homer park in baseball 8 of the last 10 years.

It's well known for this.

I guess you missed the sarcasm. Put it like this...If that would've happened in YS, everyone would've said something about the right field being suspect. That was my point.
DJ CISC0 2:02 AM - 9 May, 2011
Quote:
Granderson is on fire.
lol...I can picture Hardy getting pissed reading that.
DVDjHardy 4:59 AM - 9 May, 2011
Quote:
Quote:
Granderson is on fire.
lol...I can picture Hardy getting pissed reading that.


I hope nothing but the best for that guy. And Derek Jeter too. Both are classy guys and two of my favorite baseball players. I also liked Joe Torre. My # 1 reason for the hatred of Yankees is/was George Steinbrenner. I can go deeper in my explanation, but let me just leave it by saying that he was a Buckeye.
dj lad 6:39 PM - 9 May, 2011
Quote:
Quote:
Rangers Ballpark in Arlington has been a top 10 homer park in baseball 8 of the last 10 years.

It's well known for this.

I guess you missed the sarcasm. Put it like this...If that would've happened in YS, everyone would've said something about the right field being suspect. That was my point.

I can never tell with you guys.
slimmjimm 12:05 AM - 10 May, 2011
Quote:

I can never tell with you guys.



Easy.

Any trash talking of the Sox, is VERY serious.

Any Yankees = AWESOME!!!!! is VERY VERY serious.

Any talk about the other teams, open to interpretation.
DJ CISC0 3:24 AM - 10 May, 2011
Quote:
My # 1 reason for the hatred of Yankees is/was George Steinbrenner. I can go deeper in my explanation, but let me just leave it by saying that he was a Buckeye.
OK, but can you say with a straight face that you wouldn't have loved to have George run the Tigers? I honestly think he would've turned any team in the "Yankees". Imagine having much more than just Trammell, Gibson, Sparky, Parrish, and 1984.
DVDjHardy 3:39 AM - 10 May, 2011
I would have found another team to root for if he owned/ran the Tigers. I'm really glad he had nothing to do with my team. Not joking.

On that note...

Bo Schembechler was one of my favorite football coaches ever, but when he ran the Tigers it was the worst. He fired Ernie Harwell. Ernie Harwell! Worse than the Babe Ruth trade.
DJ CISC0 3:59 AM - 10 May, 2011
Whatever...I know you're not serious. A broadcaster over Babe Ruth? You're crazy.
DJ CISC0 4:03 AM - 10 May, 2011
Oh wait, that was sarcasm right?
slimmjimm 11:30 AM - 10 May, 2011
In other news, Milton Bradley got released......again
DJ CISC0 5:20 AM - 12 May, 2011
Wow....getting paid 10 mil just to chill at home huh? I would love to hear what really went on behind the scenes that made owners just swallow 10 mil for nothing. The Sox should pick him up....they need all the help they can get right now.
lvmez 3:02 PM - 12 May, 2011
we might need him too. our bats are silent. we should have won last night.
DJ CISC0 3:25 PM - 12 May, 2011
The Yankees actually had way more hits than the Royals...but went 2-16 w/ RISP...That's pretty bad.
dj lad 6:05 PM - 12 May, 2011
Quote:
NEW YORK (AP) -- Major League Baseball is examining a procedure performed on Yankees right-hander Bartolo Colon last year that involved stem cells being injected into his painful shoulder and elbow, according to The New York Times.

Joseph R. Purita, an orthopedic surgeon in Boca Raton, Fla., told the newspaper he flew to Colon's native Dominican Republic and helped a team of doctors there with the treatment on the 2005 AL Cy Young Award winner. He said he has used Human Growth Hormone in the procedure before, but not in this case with Colon.

HGH is banned by Major League Baseball.

"The Yankees did notify us and we are looking into it," league spokesman Pat Courtney told the Times for a story posted on its website on Wednesday night.

Read more: sportsillustrated.cnn.com


This is interesting.
DJ CISC0 7:59 PM - 12 May, 2011
Interesting that he used stem cells or interesting because you think he gave him HGH?
I don't understand why he had to mention this to MLB tho. What was he reasoning for that?
dj lad 10:47 PM - 12 May, 2011
I think any time a guy comes off rotator cuff surgery at 35 and 400 pounds and throws 95 miles an hour it raises some eyebrows.

I don't think he used HGH, but who knows.

It's a very odd situation -- it's sort of like a high-tech Tommy John surgery, really.
DJ CISC0 2:12 AM - 13 May, 2011
Yeah, it does seem out of the ordinary but (I think) this surgery has never been done before so no one knows what to really expect. I read the same Doctor was turned down by Pedro before turning to Colon. It will certainly be interesting how this turns out...it could be the new thing to do.
slimmjimm 3:29 AM - 13 May, 2011
Also, and this may or may not have an effect. My wife's aunt had cancer and a stem cell transplant, the transplant took for about 5 years, but the cancer came back, (as it was explained to me) she passed away after another unsuccessful transplant.

So sure he may be throwing pretty decent right now, but no one knows how long it will last.

HGH? Doc says no, I'm sure Colon has/will be tested, and I hate to say it, but until he comes up positive, there ain't jack shit anyone can do.

As for the argument about the procedure itself? I would like to see what the reaction was to TJ, and that was only back in 74.
lvmez 2:46 AM - 15 May, 2011
wow. someone fill out a police report. someone stole the yankee bats.
DJ CISC0 2:37 AM - 16 May, 2011
Like I said before...sox better hope that Yook our Gonzo doesn't get hurt or else they are really going to have something to worry about.....omg! As I was typing this Arod makes the error at third.....fml!
DJ CISC0 2:38 AM - 16 May, 2011
Or*
dj lad 3:12 AM - 16 May, 2011
That Salty home run would be an out at Fenway.
DJ CISC0 3:39 AM - 16 May, 2011
Of course it would've been an out...there's no wall at right in fenway.
DJ CISC0 3:42 AM - 16 May, 2011
Btw...I love this new ESPN crew. They call it as they see it...no bsing with them. I can finally turn up the volume while watching SNB.
dj lad 3:51 AM - 16 May, 2011
I actually hate Valentine, but the other two are excellent.

Meanwhile, since Jeter's "breakout" game, he's 2-27 with 2 singles.
DJ CISC0 4:12 AM - 16 May, 2011
Funny because I never liked him either but it's what he said that made me go wtf? The crew talked about the Dodgers not being able to make payroll. When Orel went with "oh its a shame that a team with that much history...blah blah blah", Bobby said something like I think it's a ploy to get Fox to sign....It just wasn't the normal formula that SNB went by. It's usually Morgan and Co. keeping it PC.

Bro, I'm beginning to think that you have a serious obsession with Jeter. The Yanks lost 5 in a row so yeah, it doesn't surprise me that Jeter is 2-27...The whole team is in a funk. The Sox on the other hand only have 2 players right now carrying them...but not far enough since this win just made the Sox half a game from last place in the Al East.
dj lad 4:34 AM - 16 May, 2011
The Red Sox have 5 players with an OPS over .800 and a team OBP that's 2nd in the AL despite being 8th in runs. They're getting base runners, they're just not scoring. Teams that put men on base eventually score.

I'm hardly worried about the Sox offense. It's actually pretty well balanced. Yes, if Gonzalez or Youkilis or Ortiz or Lowrie or Ellsbury goes down, they'd be in trouble, but keep in mind that Crawford and Pedroia are NOT going to keep playing this poorly.

The Red Sox started 2-10 and have gone 18-10 since. They're progressing just fine right now. The Yankees aren't going to keep playing this poorly (even Jeter). the Red Sox are .5 back from last place and 4 games from 1st. Which one do you think they'll be closer to in September?
DJ CISC0 4:45 AM - 16 May, 2011
Honestly, they are going to be battling it out for yet another wild card/4th place spot IMO.

Quote:
The Red Sox have 5 players with an OPS over .800 and a team OBP that's 2nd in the AL despite being 8th in runs. They're getting base runners, they're just not scoring. Teams that put men on base eventually score.
Key words "just not scoring". So that pretty much makes your first two stats irrelevant right?
dj lad 5:15 AM - 16 May, 2011
Not really. It's luck.

You keep putting men on base and eventually you will start scoring. The Red Sox are leaving an average of 7.75 men on base per game, which ranks them dead last in baseball. The difference between them and 26th place is the same as them and 15th place.

This is in spite of the fact that the Red Sox are (in the AL, and these stats are entering tonight) 4th in hits, 2nd in OBP (although after tonight they may be first), and 1st in walks. They're getting batters on, but they can't get them home. They're on pace to score 700 runs right now. Last year, the team that was 4th in hits scored 751 runs. The team that was 2nd in OBP scored 781 runs. The team that was 1st in walks scored 802 runs.

Right now? It's bad timing, bad luck, bad everything. It's turning around too -- they've been scoring a lot more runs since that 2-10 start.

Like I said: bad luck. That's what this is. They're not scoring despite putting plenty of men on base. That's not bad play, just bad luck.
dj lad 5:16 AM - 16 May, 2011
And you didn't answer my question: do you think the Red Sox will be closer to last place or first in September? Right now the Yankees are 2 games from first and 2.5 from last. Do you think THAT will continue too?

Be smarter than this.
lvmez 3:47 PM - 16 May, 2011
I didn't recognize bobby v. He looks nutz with that blonde hair. Lol.
DJ CISC0 4:07 PM - 16 May, 2011
Quote:
And you didn't answer my question: do you think the Red Sox will be closer to last place or first in September? Right now the Yankees are 2 games from first and 2.5 from last. Do you think THAT will continue too?

Be smarter than this.
Yeah, I know it's only May, there's a lot of baseball left, it's a tight AL East...I was just pointing out that the Red Sox were in last place. No need to get all worked up over it.
lvmez 6:55 PM - 16 May, 2011
quick get crazy glue, the wheels are falling off.

i've been concerned from the beginning. they need to get it together.
dj lad 8:31 PM - 16 May, 2011
They aren't falling off. The Yankees are in a 3-9 stretch. The Red Sox had a 2-10 one start. Teams do this.

It's a marathon, not a sprint. If they play another 12 games and go 3-9 in those, I'd be more concerned.
lvmez 9:31 PM - 16 May, 2011
thank you for telling me the obvious lad.

I was just expressing my concerns that I had even when they were winning.
dj lad 6:17 AM - 17 May, 2011
Yo, Adrian Gonzalez is a monster.
DJ CISC0 5:01 PM - 17 May, 2011
Quote:
Yo, Adrian Gonzalez is a monster.
I wouldn't know this since I decided to stop watching baseball right now.

R.I.P Harmon Killebrew
DJ CISC0 5:08 PM - 17 May, 2011
For the record I think Posada pulled a bitch move by removing himself from the lineup the other day....Now he said he wants out of NY? Let the circus begin.
DVDjHardy 6:23 PM - 17 May, 2011
Q: What's a bigger joke than Tigers' bullpen?
A: NY Yankees
dj lad 6:34 PM - 17 May, 2011
Quote:
For the record I think Posada pulled a bitch move by removing himself from the lineup the other day....Now he said he wants out of NY? Let the circus begin.

But he's a core four!
DJ CISC0 7:06 PM - 17 May, 2011
^^^^This made me lol. Seriously, there was no need for all that but I guess he's going through some mid-life crisis shit.
slimmjimm 3:45 AM - 18 May, 2011
DId he say he wanted out of NY? I missed that part.
DJ CISC0 8:34 PM - 18 May, 2011
Initially, that's what was said but now they have his wife on record as saying something else....yeah his wife!
dj lad 5:33 AM - 23 May, 2011
Wanna know why RBIs are so fucking stupid?

Jose Bautista has 13 RBIs that don't involve him scoring.

13.
dj lad 5:34 AM - 23 May, 2011
He has a higher OPS after 0-2 counts than Pujols does after 2-0 counts.

THAT IS INSANE.
slimmjimm 8:28 PM - 23 May, 2011
Quote:
Wanna know why RBIs are so fucking stupid?




Because the Sox couldn't get any thru their first 10 games?


Sorry, had to.
DJ CISC0 11:49 PM - 23 May, 2011
Quote:
Wanna know why RBIs are so fucking stupid?

Jose Bautista has 13 RBIs that don't involve him scoring.

13.

And how is that?
dj lad 11:53 PM - 23 May, 2011
He has 31 RBIs. Which is great, except that 18 of those are him hitting home runs. He's a terrific hitter, probably the best in baseball right now. But his RBIs are low. And it isn't his fault in any way shape or form.

That's why RBIs are dumb.
DJ CISC0 12:36 AM - 24 May, 2011
OK, I see what you're saying but you can't just dismiss them as being dumb. If you are comparing players on just RBIs to determine who's better....then that's dumb.
dj lad 2:11 AM - 24 May, 2011
No, they're a bad statistic.

All it does is measure how many times you're getting hits that advance a runner who was in scoring position. It has more to do with the batters ahead of you in the lineup than it does with anything else.

Most good players will get a lot of Runs Batted In, but that doesn't make them a good player. They get them because they usually hit #3, 4, or 5 in the lineup and therefore have a lot of opportunities to get at-bats with runners on base.

From Keith Law:
"Totally useless. In terms of measuring the value of a player’s performance, I find them absolutely useless because 1) it’s determined by how many opportunities you get — the guys who hit in front of you in the lineup, how often did they get on base; and 2) there’s no particular skill to driving runs in. There’s no such thing as a hitter who is significantly better in RBI opportunities. Guys might do that over a year or two over the course of their careers, but you are not seeing guys who are just substantially better than the norm with runners in scoring position. Obviously all hitters hit a little bit better with men on base and pitchers working out of the stretch, maybe he doesn’t generate the same velocity. But in general, a hitter’s a hitter, whether there’s nobody on base or there are guys on second and third."
dj lad 2:13 AM - 24 May, 2011
Yes, if you look at the top 50 RBI guys of all time you're gonna see a lot of great hitters. But that has more to do with opportunities than anything else.
DVDjHardy 2:46 AM - 24 May, 2011
Quote:
It has more to do with the batters ahead of you in the lineup than it does with anything else.


I agree.

If you really wanted to prove this, you could list the top 1000 players all-time with the most RBI. Then compare OPS for the 3 batters in front of # 1-100 and 901-1000 throughout their career. I'm positive that it will prove the first group to be significantly better.
DJ CISC0 2:47 AM - 24 May, 2011
You totally lost it bro....slowly step away from your screen with the bar graphs and pie charts...lol

There's nothing in Keith Law's statement that is groundbreaking or makes me dismiss the RBI stat as totally useless information. For the most part is all pretty obvious what a RBI is....no shit it depends who got on base in front of you...no shit that those who hit 3rd, 4th will get more chances. Why do you think they putting speedy players in the 1 or 2 spot and the sluggers 3rd 4th? Pretty obvious right?

Yeah, sure you can't determine a players overall offensive skill with JUST RBIs.....same thing goes for HRs, Wins, Loses, Etc...

Bottom line is that you can't use this stat to determine a players lifetime/overall skill. You CAN use it to determine a players skill in say a single game or a series like the WS.
DJ CISC0 2:51 AM - 24 May, 2011
They also have a stat for those players Hardy...it's called Run Scored.

BTW he hit another solo shot in tonight's game.
DJ CISC0 2:54 AM - 24 May, 2011
Quote:
If you really wanted to prove this, you could list the top 1000 players all-time with the most RBI. Then compare OPS for the 3 batters in front of # 1-100 and 901-1000 throughout their career. I'm positive that it will prove the first group to be significantly better.


What's scary is that he is probably working on that right now...lol
DVDjHardy 2:55 AM - 24 May, 2011
Quote:
Bottom line is that you can't use this stat to determine a players lifetime/overall skill. You CAN use it to determine a players skill in say a single game or a series like the WS.


So Yankee fans like to analyze a single game or a series performance over career stats? Got it. You guys really don't understand the simple concept of sample size.

And....

runs scored by those players = opportunities converted
the number of times they got on base = opportunities available

SMH
DJ CISC0 3:08 AM - 24 May, 2011
Quote:
So Yankee fans like to analyze a single game or a series performance over career stats? Got it. You guys really don't understand the simple concept of sample size.
The trading deadline is in July right? So, there are teams who think "sample size" and there are teams who think long term during this time. Usually, the teams that can smell a playoff spot are thinking sample size. The Yankees have been thinking like this for a while now with some exceptions.

Quote:

runs scored by those players = opportunities converted
the number of times they got on base = opportunities available

SMH
Again, totally obvious info right there. I actually agreed with this Hardy.
dj lad 4:18 AM - 24 May, 2011
Quote:
You totally lost it bro....slowly step away from your screen with the bar graphs and pie charts...lol

There's nothing in Keith Law's statement that is groundbreaking or makes me dismiss the RBI stat as totally useless information. For the most part is all pretty obvious what a RBI is....no shit it depends who got on base in front of you...no shit that those who hit 3rd, 4th will get more chances. Why do you think they putting speedy players in the 1 or 2 spot and the sluggers 3rd 4th? Pretty obvious right?

Yeah, sure you can't determine a players overall offensive skill with JUST RBIs.....same thing goes for HRs, Wins, Loses, Etc...

Bottom line is that you can't use this stat to determine a players lifetime/overall skill. You CAN use it to determine a players skill in say a single game or a series like the WS.

It's a useless stat because it doesn't really measure anything important. Shit, average with RISP is a better stat than RBI, and you know what I think about batting average already.

The point is that most players hit better with runners in scoring position. It's a common thing. Put a guy with a 800 OPS behind three guys with .400 OBPs and over a season, he'll get a bunch of RBI simply because the guys in front of him are going to get on base. It doesn't tell you anything important -- that's the point. What's a thousand times more important is the 800 OPS.
slimmjimm 4:18 PM - 24 May, 2011
You need runs to win the game right? I get the point (kinda) but close and late would you rather have the high RBI guy at bat or the dude who has 2?

It doesn't matter who's gotten on base before, that your fucking job in baseball when batting. You have 3 choices in an at bat:

Get on base

Move the runner into scoring position, or

Get the runner home.

Lot's of RBI's = won games = playoff spot = WS win = profit/bitches.
DJ CISC0 6:47 PM - 24 May, 2011
Seriously, it's not rocket science. According to lad it won't matter if you have your pitcher batting or your cleanup guy batting because "by nature" you're going to hit better regardless of your RBI count...lol

I'll be at tonight's game to witness CC take care of biz. It's Yankee grass Day...whatever that is. I doubt I'll pay attention to the game though since I'm going to be in a suite stuffing my face with food and beer.
uno seis 11:39 PM - 24 May, 2011
Quote:
Seriously, it's not rocket science. According to lad it won't matter if you have your pitcher batting or your cleanup guy batting because "by nature" you're going to hit better regardless of your RBI count...lol.

reading comprehension fail haha
dj lad 12:28 AM - 25 May, 2011
You guys don't get it.

It's not that knocking runs in doesn't matter.

It's that there about 50 better and more telling statistics than RBI. You don't really learn anything from RBI numbers.

That's what makes it a useless stat. There are so many better ways to measure a batter's performance.

Your job, at the plate, is NOT to knock runners in. It's to NOT make an out. If you knock a runner in with that, great -- but not at the expense of an out.
dj lad 12:28 AM - 25 May, 2011
Also, looks like Cashman was right about Soriano. Wowza.
DJ CISC0 3:26 AM - 25 May, 2011
Quote:
reading comprehension fail haha
Aren't you an A's fan or something? Your team is not worthy of discussion. haha

Lad, what you're saying might be true to an extent but to rule it as "completely useless" information is crazy talk. I can't believe you even want to debate this. Why do you think Gonzo is king of Boston right now? Because if it wasn't for his RBIs then Boston would probably be dead last. Do you think if they put him in the number 9 spot the Red Sox would still be where they're at? I get what you're saying about "overall" performance but "useless" nah bro.

And who's Soriano?

BTW, tonight's comeback win was classic!
dj lad 3:59 AM - 25 May, 2011
Quote:
Quote:
reading comprehension fail haha
Aren't you an A's fan or something? Your team is not worthy of discussion. haha

Lad, what you're saying might be true to an extent but to rule it as "completely useless" information is crazy talk. I can't believe you even want to debate this. Why do you think Gonzo is king of Boston right now? Because if it wasn't for his RBIs then Boston would probably be dead last. Do you think if they put him in the number 9 spot the Red Sox would still be where they're at? I get what you're saying about "overall" performance but "useless" nah bro.

And who's Soriano?

BTW, tonight's comeback win was classic!

You're some Yankee fan. Wow. Rafael Soriano.

No, without his .963 OPS they'd be in a lot of trouble. His RBI happen because of the OPS, because of the SLG, because of the OBP, because of the AVG, because of the HR, because of the 2B, because of the 3B, because of the singles, because of the walks, because of hitting sacrifice flies, because of fielders choices.

The RBIs are useless because they're a result of things that aren't in his control (runners on base, spot in lineup).

His RBI are a nice side effect of his .963 OPS.

Try and keep up, dude. Seriously.
dj lad 4:02 AM - 25 May, 2011
I'll try and explain in a simpler way:

RBI only happen because of factors a batter cannot control.
DJ CISC0 4:58 AM - 25 May, 2011
Oh yeah the "other" Soriano. For some reason I thought you meant Alfonso...being that he's playing decent ball this year and Arod is just eh so far. Plus, I heard a caller on the radio say something about trying to get Alfonso back to the Yanks today....I keep forgetting about Rafael for some reason lol...still buzzing from the game.

OK, for the 3rd time...I KNOW WHAT AN RBI IS and why a player is "awarded" an RBI. Everything you keep saying is nothing but the obvious to me.

Quote:

No, without his .963 OPS they'd be in a lot of trouble.
Really? And why do you think that they'll be in trouble? So, if he didn't get on base then what you think would happen? Maybe the Sox won't be able to score a run? Maybe the following players wouldn't get a chance to get an RBI? Cause a .963 OPS is shit if he didn't get an RBI or score a run no?
dj lad 12:19 PM - 25 May, 2011
Quote:
OK, for the 3rd time...I KNOW WHAT AN RBI IS and why a player is "awarded" an RBI. Everything you keep saying is nothing but the obvious to me.

Quote:
No, without his .963 OPS they'd be in a lot of trouble.
Really? And why do you think that they'll be in trouble? So, if he didn't get on base then what you think would happen? Maybe the Sox won't be able to score a run? Maybe the following players wouldn't get a chance to get an RBI? Cause a .963 OPS is shit if he didn't get an RBI or score a run no?

You just don't get it. Maybe you're not smart enough to. I'm not trying to be an asshole here, but maybe you just don't get it.

If you can't control why you get awarded an RBI why would it be very useful? It doesn't tell you anything important.
dj lad 1:16 PM - 25 May, 2011
Right now, Adrian Beltre has 38 RBI. That's 2nd in all of baseball.

He's also got a .303 OBP.

Tell me, what do you think the reason he has so many RBI is?
dj lad 1:23 PM - 25 May, 2011
Heck, Mike Aviles has 28 RBI despite the fact he's got a .273 OBP. Do you think that's sustainable? Do you think that getting that many RBI is a matter of luck or skill, based on the fact that he's not even getting on base 28% of the time? He has 32 hits and 28 RBI. Beltre has 38 RBI and 46 hits.

Those kind of numbers are completely unsustainable.

Gonzalez, to his credit, actually has a 65 hits and 41 RBI, which is a far more reasonable ratio. But my point remains: RBI are a useless stat because they don't really tell you anything more than, well, how many RBI a batter has. It's a background stat that doesn't give you any real information about how productive a hitter really is.
slimmjimm 1:26 PM - 25 May, 2011
lad, you can't control who is on base in front of you, but you can control having a good AB and getting a hit or a sacrifice (within reason), that's why you're rewarded with an RBI.

This thread is getting fucked up with Sabermetrics. Too much math, not enough regular baseball.

I feel like starting an MLB thread so we can get more people in to talk shit about normal W-L, HBP, and boneheaded plays.
dj lad 2:03 PM - 25 May, 2011
Quote:
lad, you can't control who is on base in front of you, but you can control having a good AB and getting a hit or a sacrifice (within reason), that's why you're rewarded with an RBI.

I'm just going to leave this thread, I think. You guys don't seem to have the ability to understand things this simple. Have fun talking about the Yankees or whatever.
slimmjimm 2:39 PM - 25 May, 2011
Quote:
Quote:
lad, you can't control who is on base in front of you, but you can control having a good AB and getting a hit or a sacrifice (within reason), that's why you're rewarded with an RBI.

I'm just going to leave this thread, I think. You guys don't seem to have the ability to understand things this simple. Have fun talking about the Yankees or whatever.



See your reason for leaving as my argument. Stop putting so much thought into it, it's a game.

Also, please address them as the First Place New York Yankees.
lvmez 2:43 PM - 25 May, 2011
good win last night. CC settled down and pitched well.

I'm nervous about the upcoming west coast trip. i'll take 5-4.
DJ CISC0 5:34 PM - 25 May, 2011
Quote:
Also, please address them as the First Place New York Yankees.
The Yanks are 2nd for most RBIs and 1st for HRs (by far) so they don't deserve to be in first.

Seriously, I get what you're saying lad...trust me I do.
DJ CISC0 5:49 PM - 31 May, 2011
Quote:
I think any time a guy comes off rotator cuff surgery at 35 and 400 pounds and throws 95 miles an hour it raises some eyebrows.
Would a 4 hit shutout raise eyebrows?
lvmez 3:11 PM - 2 June, 2011
yankees playing better than expected on this road trip. Colon and Garcia are performing miracles. lets see what happens in Anaheim.
lvmez 12:27 AM - 6 June, 2011
6-3. very good road trip. i'll be at tuesdays game. should be fun.
djlj 12:44 AM - 6 June, 2011
Midweek matchup between the Yanks and Red Sox? I just might have to tune in... between innings of the Tigers games. lol
DJ CISC0 3:52 PM - 6 June, 2011
Road trip was indeed a good one. The next 3 series wont be easy ones tho....Sox, Indians, Texas.
lvmez 4:05 AM - 8 June, 2011
at the game tonight. place was packed. too bad freddy didn't show up. yanks still struggling with men in scoring postion.
DJ CISC0 6:30 PM - 8 June, 2011
I'm highly expecting some retaliation for what Jon "Lesser" did to Tex and Martin. Big Papi is such a class act showboating after taking the 24yr old rookie Noesi out of the park....yeah he really showed him... Expect him to get plunked by AJ tonight.
uno seis 6:49 PM - 8 June, 2011
Ortiz does that all the time. So does Cano. Let em fight!
DJ CISC0 7:26 PM - 8 June, 2011
Yeah, they should. Wait, then the Sox will throw 70 year old Yankee coaches to the ground like the last time.
DVDjHardy 2:20 AM - 9 June, 2011
Quote:
I'm highly expecting some retaliation for what Jon "Lesser" did to Tex and Martin. Big Papi is such a class act showboating after taking the 24yr old rookie Noesi out of the park....yeah he really showed him... Expect him to get plunked by AJ tonight.


LOL. How's that plunking? I love how the Yankee fans always leave the game before it ends as if their team has no chance of a comeback. I don't see it being that bad in any other city.
DJ CISC0 2:40 AM - 9 June, 2011
How is it plunking? It didn't happen tonight...not sure what you mean by that.

Those empty seats that you see Hardy are the rich boy seats. They have to do some more important money making shit than stay at the game, all the way in the Bronx, on a Wednesday night. Your real fans are sitting up top (which you wont see that well on TV). I'm not saying they don't have money, but they are your real fans that really dont give a shit about what happens in the morning. You wont see that with weekend games though.

I actually stood for the come back 9th inning rally the other day which the Yanks won BTW.
DVDjHardy 2:41 AM - 9 June, 2011
You claimed that Big Papi would get plunked by AJ. I saw AJ take a beating from Big Papi in the 1st inning instead.
DJ CISC0 2:49 AM - 9 June, 2011
Oh OK...I get it now. The Tigers are playing decent ball now so I guess you can talk a little smack for now lol.
lvmez 3:00 AM - 9 June, 2011
it seems like the red sox and yankees will be there at the end with similar records, BUT the yankees just don't match up well with the redsox.

there is still a lot of baseball left.
DJ CISC0 3:21 AM - 9 June, 2011
Are these Baldwin New Era Yankee/Red Sox commercials airing outside of NY? They are hilarious!

Watchwww.youtube.com

Watchwww.youtube.com

Watchwww.youtube.com
uno seis 10:10 PM - 10 June, 2011
so much for the joba rules...i may hate the yankees but you never wanna see a good young player go down with an injury like that
DJ CISC0 12:36 AM - 11 June, 2011
Yeah, I just heard about that earlier. It's like nothing seemed to ever go right with him from the get...DWI, losing his starting spot, and now this.

They fired the A's manager yesterday right? lol
slimmjimm 5:55 AM - 11 June, 2011
I'm stunned at the need for TJ, especially with him feeling pretty much nothing. Wonder if he can build on Joba fastball of old after surg.

Quote:
so much for the joba rules...i may hate the yankees but you never wanna see a good young player go down with an injury like that


It sucks for any player, but it seems fairly routine at this point, so not the end of the world for anyone. Xavier Nady is on his second TJ, did anyone scoop him up?
DJ CISC0 2:18 AM - 13 June, 2011
Colon is out too...fml!
lvmez 8:51 PM - 25 June, 2011
let me start by saying that i've been very nervous about yankee pitching, BUT after the red sox series when we got swept, the yankees have played great. they are winning games they should be winning. i have to give credit to giradi for doing a very good job.
DJ CISC0 2:52 AM - 30 June, 2011
I agree. The Yanks are closing out the first half of the season on a good note. How about those Mets tho? Owning the Tigers 30 runs to 12 in just 2 games! LOL!
lvmez 2:23 AM - 1 July, 2011
colon and hughes are coming back soon. let's see what happens.
lvmez 4:28 PM - 10 July, 2011
hats off to the captin.
DJ CISC0 2:26 AM - 11 July, 2011
Not a bad milestone for a player who is so "over rated" huh?
DJ CISC0 2:28 AM - 11 July, 2011
I'm sure lad will find a way to discredit him though.
lvmez 3:28 AM - 11 July, 2011
i doubt it. most red sox players and fans actually like jeter.
DJ CISC0 4:29 AM - 13 July, 2011
So it was Gonzo vs Cano in the HR derby...I couldn't help but think of the crazy moon shots around this time during the steroid era...crazy! But still, it was a great derby and Cano shut it down....It's insane to see how many more HRs AL players got vs the NL....They got the All Star game tho so that goes to them in October.
DVDjHardy 6:14 PM - 13 July, 2011
I'm a little late on this but props to that Yankees fan that gave the ball back to Jeter. I probably wouldn't have done that, but he did the right thing.
lvmez 6:32 PM - 13 July, 2011
Quote:
I'm a little late on this but props to that Yankees fan that gave the ball back to Jeter. I probably wouldn't have done that, but he did the right thing.



+1
DJ CISC0 1:08 AM - 14 July, 2011
Yeah, but now he might owe the IRS like 15k because of the "gifts" he got. Dude got jerked.
DJ CISC0 8:06 PM - 29 July, 2011
R.I.P Hideki Irabu....damn dude hanged himself? This guy has issues as soon as he came to the Yankees back in 97.
lvmez 10:41 PM - 29 July, 2011
RIP


which pitcher are the yankees going to land?
slimmjimm 5:00 PM - 30 July, 2011
At this point, I doubt anyone.
lvmez 3:51 AM - 31 July, 2011
your right. looks like yanks are left out.
lvmez 10:56 PM - 31 July, 2011
looks like yankees will need to nova and aj to step up there game.
tig ol' bitties 4:13 PM - 4 August, 2011
The series in the Bronx this weekend is going to set the tone for the remainder of the season...Both the Sox and Yanks are playing like Dream Teams right now...

I am going to go ahead and say Sox take the series 2-1 ...
tig ol' bitties 4:14 PM - 4 August, 2011
RED SOX RULE! hahaha
DJ CISC0 2:46 AM - 5 August, 2011
The series is actually in Boston...So I'm to go ahead and say that the Yanks win the series 2-1.

I'll give them tomorrow nights game despite the fact that Colon is doing great for the Yanks. In game 2, I cant picture CC getting rocked yet another time against the Sox...that just cant continue for this long....it just can't. Not to mention Lackey is playing like crap this year. In game 3, the Yankees are going to finally own Beckett because it's about that time and I simply hate him.

Oh yeah...team fight around the 5th inning.
lvmez 12:45 PM - 6 August, 2011
good game.
lvmez 2:03 PM - 16 August, 2011
tied for first again.

who do you think is going to win AL mvp?

Granderson is making a run at it.
DVDjHardy 2:53 PM - 16 August, 2011
Verlander.
lvmez 3:00 PM - 16 August, 2011
good point. he deserves it as well.
DVDjHardy 6:34 PM - 16 August, 2011
The big thing working against Granderson is that he has a LOT of strike outs, but he is also second to Swisher in walks - which is a rare combination. As I've said before, I really like Granderson but I would say Cano is the best player for the Yankees.

The Tigers also have 3 really stellar offensive players this year - Cabrera, Martinaz and Peralta. But JV leads the league in wins, strike outs, innings pitched, whip, 2nd in ERA and ER given up amongst pitcher with 180+ innings pitched, least losses, etc. But the most impressive is that every time he pitches after a Tigers loss (like tonight and so many times this season), the Tigers win. Besides that the no-hitter (which was almost a perfect game), he's had like 3 other legit chances to have at least a no-hitter this year. And most of all, it's safe to say the Tigers wouldn't be in 1st place this year if it wasn't for him. I hope he gets it! I don't think any pitcher has been the MVP in either league since Eckersley in 92.
lvmez 7:39 PM - 16 August, 2011
i doubt they will give it to a pitcher, even though Verlander is pitching great. Still think Adrian will win, but Granderson will make it close.
DJ CISC0 4:14 AM - 18 August, 2011
Eck was closing for the A's and not starting but I get your point Hardy...BTW, The Yanks are in 1st right now sooo...Honestly, right now, Granderson gets it if he stays healthy...forget Pedroia/Elsbury...and Gonzo doesn't even belong in the conversation.

I actually started reading "Moneyball" by Michael Lewis......I'm almost half way through it. It's about Sabermetrics/Billy Beane/Bill James...pretty interesting...I might even change my views on the current "traditional" stat system if it all makes sense to me at the end....MAYBE.
slimmjimm 12:03 PM - 18 August, 2011
Just read an article on Yahoo about Damon, how he is about 300 hits shy of 3000, and a case for the HOF.

I know 3000 hits is the point where you get in, but I'm not so sure Damon is a HOF'er. An asset, sure, but he doesn't scream anything but a very good player on some very very good teams.

What say you?
DJ CISC0 4:13 AM - 22 August, 2011
If Mattingly didn't get in then Damon would never get in the HOF. I just can't picture JD in the HOF.

Did you see Granderson's inside the park HR today? Then Tex makes it a back to back...LOL, I never seen that happen before.

Lad, when was the last time that happened? Pull out the stats.
DJ CISC0 3:38 AM - 2 September, 2011
Great series no question about it. September baseball is officially here!
lvmez 12:09 PM - 2 September, 2011
great series, but yankee pitching is scary.
slimmjimm 12:15 PM - 2 September, 2011
Quote:
great series, but yankee pitching is scary.



When is the last time it hasn't been scary?
lvmez 1:36 PM - 2 September, 2011
1996
slimmjimm 3:05 PM - 2 September, 2011
Quote:
1996


Exactly, and we've done OK since then.
DJ CISC0 3:52 AM - 3 September, 2011
Quote:
great series, but yankee pitching is scary.

It's very scary especially with AJ, CC (against Boston), and Mo....Mo is no longer that guy you see take the mound and you can pretty much walk away thinking it's over...like in the past.

Looks like it's going to be another stressful race....good times.
lvmez 12:44 PM - 3 September, 2011
exactly.
lvmez 10:32 PM - 5 September, 2011
incredible game today. horrible pitching but ton of runs. montero with two homers.
DJ CISC0 2:45 AM - 8 September, 2011
I just got back from a little vacation so I couldn't catch any games where I was at. Montero does look like he's off to a good start tho.

BTW...I finished reading Moneyball and I still think sabermatrics is a bunch of BS....I might need to read another book on it I guess.
lvmez 3:02 AM - 21 September, 2011
3 wins to clinch!!
lvmez 2:15 AM - 22 September, 2011
the red sox are going to have to beat the yankees this weekend. i wonder if yankees will rest there starters?
DJ CISC0 2:28 AM - 22 September, 2011
Playoffs!? LOL...I'm loving this Red Sox meltdown...it's funny seeing all their big signings just straight flop all at once. Seriously, did Crawford sit out two games the other day because of a stiff neck? Are you serious???...on the most important stretch of the season??? LOL...wow...they are just looking so damn pathetic right now.. History in the making.
DJ CISC0 2:29 AM - 22 September, 2011
The Yankees don't need to have their starters out there this weekend. Boston is doing a pretty good job at failing all by themselves. I mean, to give you an idea on how sad and pathetic they are right now...they gave up 28 runs to the Orioles in their last 4 games!!! 28!...The Orioles!...Do you know how shitty Baltimore is this year?
lvmez 2:33 AM - 22 September, 2011
sabermetrics??????
DJ CISC0 2:47 AM - 22 September, 2011
Nah,just checked it on the espn schedule...lol.

I hate to tell you this lvmez but Hardy might finally get his chance to talk some post season trash with his Tigers.
lvmez 2:52 AM - 22 September, 2011
what i meant was sabermetrics didn't predict what happened to the red sox.

I agree. Tigers are doing great. I have no issue with anyone talking shit about there team. I think we will match up well against tigers. i rather face them than the rangers.
lvmez 3:20 AM - 22 September, 2011
another banner!!!!


hip hip jorge!!
DJ CISC0 3:30 AM - 22 September, 2011
So you mean to tell me that sabermetrics didn't predict that Dice K was going to have TJ surgery? So why are they still paying him all that money? Or that Crawford wasn't going to live up to the expectations of the Red Sox? This is fascinating stuff...lol

But according to Lad, CC was supposed to blow his arm out by now. I guess shedding those 25 pounds during the off season screwed up the charts...I say they should come out with a new stat that factors in the difference in weight loss from the year before + wins - ER, - walks, - hits, +SO....Oh yeah and split that into day/night/home/road games. This should give us a better understanding.
lvmez 2:49 AM - 25 September, 2011
wild card race is exciting. I don't think the rays will catch the red sox but still exciting.

Also feels good to beat red sox today when they REALLY needed a win.
lvmez 9:22 PM - 25 September, 2011
wild card coming down to the wire.
DJ CISC0 3:45 AM - 27 September, 2011
Wow...red sox lose their lead for the wildcard...I thought the Mets were the worst in Sept meltdowns. This is by far the worst I've ever seen.....and loving every minute of it!
DJ CISC0 11:29 PM - 27 September, 2011
I'm not going to lie but I saw Ozzie Guillen as the perfect fit in Boston. It'll be a waste to see him with the Marlins.
slimmjimm 10:21 PM - 28 September, 2011
Quote:
I'm not going to lie but I saw Ozzie Guillen as the perfect fit in Boston. It'll be a waste to see him with the Marlins.


Not sure I agree about the Boston thing, but he's gonna be bored as hell in FL. Can we start a pool for the first time he calls out a lack of fans?
DJ CISC0 4:08 AM - 29 September, 2011
You got to love Crawford....He lived up to the hype all the way to the very end.....What a great investment by Boston...what a huge choke by the Red Sox...you guys made history...cheers!
lvmez 4:08 AM - 29 September, 2011
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS. what a day in baseball.

red sox going home!!!!!!!!!!!
lvmez 4:09 AM - 29 September, 2011
I'll be at stadium friday night. can't wait.
DJ CISC0 4:12 AM - 29 September, 2011
^^^ Nice! I might have a hook up for the playoffs but nothing confirmed...have fun.

What was great about it was the fact that the Sox were rooting for the Yanks for 3 days straight and still ended up losing.....hahaha!
slimmjimm 11:56 AM - 29 September, 2011
So, where's Lad?

The more I think of the team we have, the more I kind of actually like our chances.
lvmez 12:08 PM - 29 September, 2011
in lad's defense, he hasn't been on here for a while. Im sure he is upset. no one saw this coming.

we have ours hands full with tigers.
DJ CISC0 4:51 PM - 29 September, 2011
Quote:
Do you really think Crawford will bomb? Honest question.


I think lad is either nursing a crazy hangover or still crunching the stats trying to make sense out of all this. I love how gonzo is blaming night games for their meltdown....serious bro!?

I agree slimm...the Yanks are looking good all around.
slimmjimm 8:55 PM - 29 September, 2011
Methinks this thread is funny since it started in 2009

Just have to go to one of my offseason posts, taken in full:

Quote:
I would agree with your heckling to a point, I don't think anyone is mad about Rivera for 2 years.

Lester and Buchholz, fine, but Beckett is falling off, and Lackeys mole will lose magic sooner than you might think.

And you guys still wanted Martin knee surgery and all.



I encourage everyone to skim through this thread from the beginning, and obviously beginning offseason '11, it's full of so much I told you so, that it's not even fair.
DJ CISC0 11:58 PM - 29 September, 2011
Quote:
Sox are gonna go 158-4.
aaaaahhh so close.
Quote:
Well, the major problem with the Sox is that NOTHING is working. They're hitting horribly, pitching horribly, playing bad defense, and running into outs on the bases.
Things, really, can only get better.
And it did....until September came around.

Quote:
And you didn't answer my question: do you think the Red Sox will be closer to last place or first in September?

Well actually in way they were both...lol.
djlj 9:08 PM - 30 September, 2011
Go Tigers!!!
DJ CISC0 12:12 AM - 1 October, 2011
Francona out!...damn that was fast...

Tigers go down tonight...CC for the win!
slimmjimm 2:18 AM - 1 October, 2011
Quote:
Francona out!...damn that was fast...

Tigers go down tonight...CC for the win!


Yeah, I was way surprised. It was a possibility sure, but not expected. From what few blurbs I read it seems like he was beginning to be unhappy. Guess there was not as much chemistry in the Sawx clubhouse as some people thought. I wonder if there is a stat for wins based on chemistry.

No surprise is the fucking rain delay. A bit ridiculous this year with delays/postponements .
lvmez 5:13 AM - 1 October, 2011
damm, just got back from game. looks like Verlander didn't have his A stuff tonight. who knows? will try again tomorrow night.
lvmez 4:02 PM - 2 October, 2011
great win last night. nova and cano played incredible.
djlj 9:32 PM - 3 October, 2011
CC vs JV part 2 tonight. Should be fun matchup since tonight they'll go past the second inning!
lvmez 2:04 PM - 4 October, 2011
not good.
DVDjHardy 5:17 AM - 5 October, 2011
I was at the game earlier. Yankees won that game because of Granderson. I am not worried about Fister in game 5, but the hitters need to wake up. They put really good pressure on AJ today in the first inning and then did absolutely nothing rest of the game.

Gut feeling says we'll win, but logic says Yankees.
lvmez 12:39 PM - 5 October, 2011
I'm nervous as well. Tex & A-rod are a no show. A lot of pressure on a rookie pitcher tonight.
lvmez 3:42 AM - 7 October, 2011
congrats hardy.


good pitching by tigers. they deserved it.
DJ CISC0 4:07 AM - 7 October, 2011
I think Tiger fans are more shocked than Yankee fans right now.....Good game...Fuck the Tigers!
DVDjHardy 7:40 AM - 7 October, 2011
Quote:
congrats hardy.


good pitching by tigers. they deserved it.


Thank you.

Quote:
I think Tiger fans are more shocked than Yankee fans right now.....Good game...Fuck the Tigers!


LOL. Don't be a sore loser. The better team won. And no real Tigers fan should be surprised that they won. They've been lights out since they acquired Fister and then Young.
slimmjimm 11:59 AM - 7 October, 2011
They broke my heart.

Congrats Hardy.

I think it was great pitching on both sides, the Tigers just ended up on the better side, 3 games could have gone either way.

I'm picking Tigers and Cards in the WS.
djlj 5:51 PM - 7 October, 2011
Quote:
I think Tiger fans are more shocked than Yankee fans right now.....Good game...Fuck the Tigers!


Nah we're not shocked. It was a really entertaining series though! Now it's time to whoop on the Rangers.
djlj 5:52 PM - 7 October, 2011
Quote:
They broke my heart.

Congrats Hardy.

I think it was great pitching on both sides, the Tigers just ended up on the better side, 3 games could have gone either way.

I'm picking Tigers and Cards in the WS.


Let's hope it's a replay of the '68 WS instead of the '06 WS if we end up playing the Cards!
DVDjHardy 6:46 PM - 7 October, 2011
I'm rooting for the Cards against the Phillies for sure. That's the last pitching rotation anybody should want to face, and their line-up is right up there with the Yankees, Red Sox, Rangers, etc.
slimmjimm 9:12 PM - 7 October, 2011
My thing is, with the Phils (I live in PA, about 2 1/2 hrs north BTW) why is there even a game 5? That rotation is incredible, but again, this is why the games aren't played on paper, if they were, Boston would win the next 21 WS cuz the r OMG sooooo awesome right, lad?

I also forgot it was the Cards and Tigers on '06.
DJ CISC0 11:11 PM - 7 October, 2011
Quote:

[quote
Quote:
I think Tiger fans are more shocked than Yankee fans right now.....Good game...Fuck the Tigers!


LOL. Don't be a sore loser. The better team won. And no real Tigers fan should be surprised that they won. They've been lights out since they acquired Fister and then Young.
Nah bro...I'm kidding...good series indeed...I'll be rooting for the Tigers.
ontime1269 4:23 AM - 10 October, 2011
I'm not a big baseball and don't really watch games much but wanted to watch tomorrows Rangers game. Why the hell do they start the games in the afternoon while everyone is at work? Doesn't make sense to me.
DVDjHardy 5:24 AM - 10 October, 2011
Quote:
I'm not a big baseball and don't really watch games much but wanted to watch tomorrows Rangers game. Why the hell do they start the games in the afternoon while everyone is at work? Doesn't make sense to me.


1. TV dictates the game times. Since it's a rescheduled game on a travel day, they have to work around the game time for Cardinals @ Brewers, which is 8 PM.

2. It's better to get the game done ASAP so both teams can fly to Detroit and get ready for tomorrow's game. This is why a lot of times the 3rd game of regular season series is played during the day.

3. Lions are on Monday Night Football (against the rival Bears) and even though it wouldn't be smart for any baseball team to try and compete for ratings against a football game.
lvmez 2:34 PM - 12 October, 2011
what is going on in redsox nation? first francona and now theo. I also heard a story on the radio about drinking during the game by other starting pitchers.
DJ CISC0 5:22 PM - 12 October, 2011
They are saying that off the field distractions like that ^ caused their September flop. Also, his wife of 30 years left him and was living in a hotel this season. He denied all of this but I don't see anything wrong with admitting to it...Shit, that alone would stress anyone out.

But yeah, looks like RSN is falling apart. I read that Theo landed the gig with the Cubs.
lvmez 6:53 PM - 12 October, 2011
Cubs should hire Francona.
DJ CISC0 4:55 AM - 15 October, 2011
Tigers are in a do or die position...I really hope they beat the Rangers.

Wow! What a circus in Beantown right now lol. Playing video games, drinking during games, Gm and manager out....they turned into a joke almost instantly.
djlj 2:18 PM - 15 October, 2011
Tigs have had a lot of men left on base this series, and we're turning into the walking wounded. Games 1, 2, and 4 each could have easily have been Tiger wins. We've shown that we're very capable of beating the Rangers, this is all going to just come down to whether or not we can get it down with RISP.
djlj 2:19 PM - 15 October, 2011
get it *done
ontime1269 3:09 AM - 16 October, 2011
I knew that once the Rangers' Bats woke up that the Tigers didn't have a chance.
slimmjimm 12:27 AM - 1 November, 2011
CC didn't opt out.

I stand by my winningness in this thread.
lvmez 2:18 AM - 1 November, 2011
he did opt out and received an extension.

$25 million for the 5th year is not bad for the numbers he has put up will in ny.
lvmez 2:18 AM - 1 November, 2011
while
DJ CISC0 4:04 AM - 1 November, 2011
Did he? I didn't think he did... If he did then he would've gotten offers from other teams...I could be wrong . Chances are, he would've gotten 6 years or better but CC remains a Yankee and that's good news for sure.
lvmez 2:02 PM - 1 November, 2011
I think you guys are right. Just read that they had a deadline. My bad. Either way, I'm happy.
slimmjimm 10:18 PM - 1 November, 2011
IMO 25mil per year is still a ton of money, but they the only added 30mil and 1 guaranteed year to the contract, so in that regard, it's not the worst thing in the world.
lvmez 1:34 AM - 13 November, 2011
papelbon to phillies. everyone leaving boston in a hurry.
djlj 4:05 AM - 28 February, 2012
Time to get the draft boards ready for 2012 fantasy baseball!
DJ CISC0 1:44 AM - 29 February, 2012
Crazy off season for sure. The A.L got a major boost with the addition of Puljos and Prince. I thought the Cashman stalker story was going to turn into a big mess but it really didn't. The most entertaining stuff came from the Red Sox. The banning of beer in the clubhouse and flights...Sox owner John Henry saying he regretted the signing of Crawford then apologizing. Their biggest signing this off season was Bobby V lol. Then, you have Francona working for ESPN and questioning Valentines moves this off season lol. Funny how their roles are reversed now. It should be another great season.